* Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 03:56:06PM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
Like many people's, my incoming mail is routed off into various folders
by the MTA which I then read with mutt. The problem is that while mutt's
mail folder handling is pretty darn
* Greg McCarroll ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Well my solution, is not that good, but it works for me, i simly use
wmbiff, a little windowmaker docking bar app that lists the number of
messages in each folder, unless there are new messages in which case
it lists the number of new messages in
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 07:41:28AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
Well my solution, is not that good, but it works for me, i simly use
wmbiff, a little windowmaker docking bar app that lists the number of
messages in each folder, unless there are new messages in which case
it lists the number
Dave Cross sent the following bits through the ether:
Over the next few months I'm going to wind down my involvement
with london.pm
How could you Dave!?
You know I haven't done D, E, F, G, H, I, J or K yet.
Honestly ;-)
Leon
--
Leon
Paul Makepeace sent the following bits through the ether:
The problem is when you have folders with tens of thousands of
emails (London.pm is about to hit 20k here)
I've moved my mail from laptop to laptop to new company computer over
the years and it's dawned on me that I never (that is
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 09:41:44AM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote:
Paul Makepeace sent the following bits through the ether:
The problem is when you have folders with tens of thousands of
emails (London.pm is about to hit 20k here)
I've moved my mail from laptop to laptop to new company
From: Leon Brocard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 10/2/01 9:41:44 AM
I've moved my mail from laptop to laptop to new company
computer over the years and it's dawned on me that I
never (that is NEVER) need archives which are more than a
week or so old.
Agressive deletion is the only way.
This
Simon Wilcox wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Paul Makepeace wrote:
In this case, however, they will be the lead of only two sysadmins and I
want someone to come in and take a long term responsibility.
However you look at it, no amount of documentation makes up for practical
experience of
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 12:25:45 -0400 (EDT)
Chris Devers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's worth noting that this was apparently not just another gratuitous
Spielbergism. It was apparently part of the story as Kubrick was planning
on telling it, and as produced by Speilberg was true to that.
Can
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:31:33 +0100 (BST)
Simon Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However you look at it, no amount of documentation makes up for
practical experience of the system you are supporting. If you change
sys admins every 6-12 months you end up with a layered environment,
each layer
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001 15:07:18 + (GMT)
Redvers Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First time I was let loose in an American town I Jaywalked by way from
one side to the other. The typical cross halfway, down the road a bit
cross the rest strategy of road traversal it seems is not appreciated
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 02:16:08AM -0700, Dave Cross wrote:
From: Leon Brocard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 10/2/01 9:41:44 AM
I've moved my mail from laptop to laptop to new company
computer over the years and it's dawned on me that I
never (that is NEVER) need archives which are more than
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Greg Cope wrote:
Simon Wilcox wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Paul Makepeace wrote:
In this case, however, they will be the lead of only two sysadmins and I
want someone to come in and take a long term responsibility.
However you look at it, no amount of
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Sam Vilain wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:31:33 +0100 (BST)
Simon Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However you look at it, no amount of documentation makes up for
practical experience of the system you are supporting. If you change
sys admins every 6-12 months you end
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:12:05AM -0700, Paul Makepeace said:
That seems like a good partial solution. The problem is when you have
folders with tens of thousands of emails (London.pm is about to hit 20k
here). The disadvantage to chopping these massive folders up is
searching later[1].
Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Leon Brocard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 10/2/01 9:41:44 AM
I've moved my mail from laptop to laptop to new company
computer over the years and it's dawned on me that I
never (that is NEVER) need archives which are more than a
week or so old.
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 11:29:12AM +, Steve Mynott wrote:
Or use gnus to integrate your mailing list and news reading.
Gnus (by default) will delete a read email automatically unless you
tag it in order to save it.
Because gnus is written in a high level language (lisp) it is
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 09:41:44AM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote:
I've moved my mail from laptop to laptop to new company computer over
the years and it's dawned on me that I never (that is NEVER) need
archives which are more than a week or so old.
Agressive deletion is the only way.
I would
Dominic Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The trouble that I found with gnus the last time that I used it was that
when it wa doing something, it locked your emacs up. Which is a pain if
you were trying to edit some perl code at the same time.
I am not sure what you mean by lock up.
I
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:21:14PM +, Steve Mynott wrote:
Dominic Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The trouble that I found with gnus the last time that I used it was that
when it wa doing something, it locked your emacs up. Which is a pain if
you were trying to edit some perl code
Dominic == Dominic Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dominic [1] And emacs wasn't. It bugs me to see people fire off yet
Dominic another emacs copy to make a single edit to a single file.
Dominic Swap, swap, swappity swap!
Well, that's why gnuserv/gnuclient exists.
Jon
Just to drag us back on topic for a while, did you all realise
that series 6 of Buffy starts in the US tonight.
And a little reminder to our Merkan subscribers, many of us still
haven't seen all of series 5, so please avoid posting spoilers.
We're really not interesting in finding out how
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 02:11:56PM +0100, Jon Nangle wrote:
Dominic == Dominic Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dominic [1] And emacs wasn't. It bugs me to see people fire off yet
Dominic another emacs copy to make a single edit to a single file.
Dominic Swap, swap, swappity
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 02:25:02PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
I know that.
You know that.
Try explaining that to people who don't care.
I don't care. Practice on me if you like.
Nick
--
SPAM while y#SPAM?\r\n# #d||s#.{24}#$PAM^=$,''#e||s'$^'sPaM!SpaM!SPaM!SP@M
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 11:41:23AM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
Then set up a WikiWiki for your documentation. It's quick and easy
enough that it actually gets used.
Good idea, I shall give it a go. Anyone have any practical experience of
making this work ?
http://twiki.sourceforge.net/
Whilst exploring deep in my study over the weekend, I came across
a box of the original Perl Monger Baseball Caps. I don't know
how many I've got, but it's probably about a dozen. We got them
when they were first made two years ago. I sold a few to members,
but the rest must have been stored.
From: Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We're really not interesting in finding out how Buffy c b***
f*** t** d*** - well not until we get to see it all next January.
Does that translate into ...how Buff jumps the shark ?
duck and cover
;)
Barbie.
SPOILER: AI
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Sam Vilain wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 12:25:45 -0400 (EDT)
Chris Devers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's worth noting that this was apparently not just another gratuitous
Spielbergism. It was apparently part of the story as Kubrick was planning
on telling
From: Leon Brocard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Makepeace sent the following bits through the ether:
The problem is when you have folders with tens of thousands of
emails (London.pm is about to hit 20k here)
I've moved my mail from laptop to laptop to new company computer over
the years and
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 06:16:23AM -0700, Dave Cross wrote:
Just to drag us back on topic for a while, did you all realise
that series 6 of Buffy starts in the US tonight.
And a little reminder to our Merkan subscribers, many of us still
haven't seen all of series 5, so please avoid
From: Joshua Rey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 10/2/01 4:06:35 PM
If you are, contact Joshua either by email or on 01223 476929.
Dave...
WHO WE WANT
I'm looking for someone to share the load of developing a
big CGI for a www business that should have gone live
last month (August actually).
David H. Adler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dha, counting the hours... Ooh! and I'll finally be able to see The
Pack...
I'd watch it, but the resident Buffy Fan here thinks I'm a bitch, so... no.
--
http://www.the-anathema.org
stylish... warped... faintly ironic
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:42:29PM -0400, anathema wrote:
David H. Adler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dha, counting the hours... Ooh! and I'll finally be able to see The
Pack...
I'd watch it, but the resident Buffy Fan here thinks I'm a bitch, so... no.
The resident buffy fan? Ha ha ha!
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
And a little reminder to our Merkan subscribers, many of us still
haven't seen all of series 5, so please avoid posting spoilers.
We're really not interesting in finding out how Buffy c b***
f*** t** d*** - well not until we get to see it all next
David H. Adler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd watch it, but the resident Buffy Fan here thinks I'm a bitch, so... no.
The resident buffy fan? Ha ha ha!
Here, meaning my dorm, y'foolish NYer.
You must be new here... ;-)
You're not so old that I can't still take you across my knee, young man!
35 matches
Mail list logo
