chr wrote:
Author: chr
Date: Fri Mar 27 23:55:20 2009
New Revision: 28949
URL: http://lyx.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28949
Log:
Removed empty lines at end to get rid of warnings
Since i18n.inc is autogenerated, we should rather fix this in postats.py.
Jürgen
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
This patch customizes the color of the greyed-out-notes.
Fine with me and this should also go to branch if possible.
I think this is a file format change. On reversion, the greyedout stuff needs
to be added to the preamble.
Jürgen
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
This patch fixes..
* accelerator clashes,
* missing accelerators,
* strings (capitalization).
Ok ?
Yes (if you think of branch as well).
Jürgen
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Juergen, do you have some standard list of things you check before
tarballs are officially released?
Here's what I do:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ReleaseProcedure#toc7
is it worth to add compilation
test for the monolithic builds?
such as?
Jürgen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I feel embarassed. Forget about it.
That's too easy! We have the right to know!
What about this: generate i18n.inc in po/ and forget to copy it into the www-
user tree? Embarrassing enough?
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
The patch implements Provides geometry 1 to those classes, with the
effect that settings are ignored and the corresponding GUI widgets
disabled.
OK?
Since there were no objections, I committed to branch and trunk.
Jürgen
I've traced this to r28342. The bug that was meant to solve is
similar to this one, but it looks as if the fix for that one either
caused or revealed another bug. I think maybe what's happening is
that, under certain circumstances, we're hitting that new line over
and over, before the
Le 28 mars 09 à 10:44, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I feel embarassed. Forget about it.
That's too easy! We have the right to know!
What about this: generate i18n.inc in po/ and forget to copy it
into the www-
user tree? Embarrassing enough?
Not bad :)
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 18:52, rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote:
Glad to see that's back. What are the plans for bugzilla now?
My plan is to get aussie moved to my place before doing anything.
Preferrable I'd like to do nothing with bugzilla.
I would have preffered a move to trac for the bug
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Not bad :) Having to move those files explicitly is indeed a bit
annnoying. I wonder
whether it would work to make a non-symbolic link between po/i18n.inc
and www-user tree.
That would be a good idea. And maybe let make update-po run make i18n.inc (or
create a
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Richard heck schreef:
rgheck wrote:
rgheck wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
Here's the situation. Load the attached file. Nothing particularly
odd in it. Put the cursor at the end of the line marked HERE. Now
use the scroll bar to scroll up several
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:30, Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 18:52, rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote:
Glad to see that's back. What are the plans for bugzilla now?
My plan is to get aussie moved to my place before doing anything.
Preferrable I'd like
Dear LyX developers,
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only
thing they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for a
minimum of three years. I thought the deal was fair and the news text is
OK (http://www.beslist.nl/nieuws/82.html). Maybe I should
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 13:35, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote:
Dear LyX developers,
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only thing
they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for a minimum of
three years. I thought the deal was fair and the
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 14:15, Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 13:35, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote:
Dear LyX developers,
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only thing
they asked in exchange was to put a link to their
As it stands now it seems that _you_ have got sponsorship to do
work on lyx,
that place some requirements on the LyX Project.
Well, this means that a company pay someone to get some work done for
LyX,
which is very close to what happens with other projects, for example. If
the company had
I am trying to get the bugzilla moved to trac now, so perhaps I can
have it
up and
working today if all goes well.
/me crossing fingers
JMarc
Le 28 mars 09 à 14:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Well, this means that a company pay someone to get some work done
for LyX,
which is very close to what happens with other projects, for
example. If
the company had contributed the code, we would have had no problem
acknowledging it (would
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €).
Do you have some context explaining why LyX was chosen, BTW?
JMarc
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only
thing they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for a
minimum of three years. I thought the deal was fair and the news text is
OK (http://www.beslist.nl/nieuws/82.html). Maybe I
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 14:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.orgwrote:
As it stands now it seems that _you_ have got sponsorship to do work on
lyx,
that place some requirements on the LyX Project.
Well, this means that a company pay someone to get some work done for LyX,
which is
Abdelrazak Younes schreef:
Dear LyX developers,
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only
thing they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for
a minimum of three years. I thought the deal was fair and the news
text is OK
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Besides, the bugs are running out anyway.
Ha!
It would also be nice if I could construct a somewhat larger feature to
have something to be proud of.
I think your bugfixing is more than enough reason to be proud (having said
that, I certainly will not try to
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:30, Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 18:52, rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote:
Glad to see that's back. What are the plans for bugzilla now?
My plan is to get aussie moved to my place before
Note that if you put the call to LFUN_RECENTER/LFUN_SCREEN_SHOW_CURSOR
before the first call to textMetrics(), the crash disappears in all
cases. So it looks like a caching problem, initialization problem. That
is also supported by the fact that I don't see this at Windows. How was
it again,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef:
I've traced this to r28342. The bug that was meant to solve is
similar to this one, but it looks as if the fix for that one either
caused or revealed another bug. I think maybe what's happening is
that, under certain circumstances, we're hitting that new line over
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 15:22, rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:30, Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.org
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 18:52, rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote:
Glad to see that's back. What are the plans for
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes schreef:
Dear LyX developers,
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only
thing they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for
a minimum of three years. I thought the deal was fair and the news
text is
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Note that if you put the call to LFUN_RECENTER/LFUN_SCREEN_SHOW_CURSOR
before the first call to textMetrics(), the crash disappears in all
cases. So it looks like a caching problem, initialization problem.
That is also supported by the fact that I don't see this
The donations page already seems to list corporate and individual
sponsors, separately. And I don't really see any problem with letting
people link to little news blurbs, or just to their own websites. I
wouldn't have any problem, for example, if the record of the corporate
donation from
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 15:33, Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.org wrote:
After a number of false starts fixup and re-converts I have no passed the
1071 bugs converted mark, but I guess I will still have to add more fixups
and workarounds.
Up to 1745 now.
--
Lgb
On 28/03/2009 14:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
As it stands now it seems that _you_ have got sponsorship to do work
on lyx,
that place some requirements on the LyX Project.
Well, this means that a company pay someone to get some work done for
LyX,
which is very close to what happens with
On 28/03/2009 14:32, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €).
Do you have some context explaining why LyX was chosen, BTW?
Not really, the marketing person said that some people in the company
used LyX and love it. They recommended to give LyX a
On 28/03/2009 14:39, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only
thing they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for a
minimum of three years. I thought the deal was fair and the news text is
OK
On 28/03/2009 14:20, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 14:15, Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.org
mailto:lar...@lyx.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 13:35, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org
mailto:you...@lyx.org wrote:
Dear LyX developers,
I just
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 15:54, Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 15:33, Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.org wrote:
After a number of false starts fixup and re-converts I have no passed the
1071 bugs converted mark, but I guess I will still have to add more
On 28/03/2009 15:16, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes schreef:
Dear LyX developers,
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only
thing they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for
a minimum of three years. I thought the deal was fair
Joost Verburg wrote:
Piero Faustini wrote:
Ok, I know I'm a LyX addicted, but I',m puzzled about the Windows
installer of version 1.6.2 which is not available. The Windows wiki
points to both bundled and simple installers, but it's dead links. The
Download page report 1.6.1 and nothing more.
Joost Verburg wrote:
The installers are available at: www.lyx.org/~joost
I get a 404: The requested URL /~joost was not found on this server. (same
for my own page, /~spitz)
Could you drop the installers to
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming ?
Jürgen
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 16:37, Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 15:54, Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 15:33, Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.orgwrote:
After a number of false starts fixup and re-converts I have no passed
I think this is a file format change.
Yes, sorry. Sp a new feature for LyX 2.0 only.
regards Uwe
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 17:39, Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 16:37, Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 15:54, Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.orgwrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 15:33, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Well maybe the LyX web site is quite popular who knows? :-)
Actually, we don't even know if LyX users count in the thousands,
hundreds of thousand or millions...
Yes it is popular, have a look here:
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/lyx.org
Lyx.org has a traffic rank of:
As it stands now it seems that _you_ have got sponsorship to do work on lyx,
that
place some requirements on the LyX Project.
Well, I am part of the LyX project and I created this page so maybe. I did
all of this as openly
as possible but I should have have asked for permission for the 3
Hi,
I tried this:
svn co svn+ssh://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk lyx-devel
which used to work and it asks me for a password (which I've sent to Lars
earlier), but it fails after three tries. I've a vague memory it was
changed to:
svn co
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Joost Verburg wrote:
The installers are available at: www.lyx.org/~joost
I get a 404: The requested URL /~joost was not found on this server. (same
for my own page, /~spitz)
Could you drop the installers to
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 19:47, Christian Ridderström
christian.ridderst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I tried this:
svn co svn+ssh://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk lyx-devel
wont work
which used to work and it asks me for a password (which I've sent to Lars
earlier), but it fails
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 19:48, Christian Ridderström
christian.ridderst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Joost Verburg wrote:
The installers are available at:
www.lyx.org/~joosthttp://www.lyx.org/%7Ejoost
I get a 404: The requested URL /~joost was not
On 28/03/2009 19:26, Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
Well maybe the LyX web site is quite popular who knows? :-)
Actually, we don't even know if LyX users count in the thousands,
hundreds of thousand or millions...
Yes it is popular, have a look here:
On 28/03/2009 19:40, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
As it stands now it seems that _you_ have got sponsorship to do
work on lyx, that
place some requirements on the LyX Project.
Well, I am part of the LyX project and I created this page so maybe.
I did all of this as openly
as possible but I should
Hi,
Since www.lyx.org is now being served from the new LyX server, this means
that everything developers used to have in personal directories on aussie,
the old www.lyx.org, will no longer be available through e.g.
www.lyx.org/~joost
So we developers should probably check if there's
I'm creating the new installers right now.
Hello Joost,
please don't use Qt 4.5.0 for LyX 1.6.2 because we found out that this new version has too many
regressions making LyX very unstable.
thanks and regards
Uwe
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
That said, I do not think this is a bad thing, but I'd like to know
that the sponsorhip is for, special procjetcs etc.
You meant what the sponsorship is for I guess? Well, isn't it clear?
To sponsor the development of the listed feature?
It
That being said Lars, I guess you received some money throughout the
years thanks to your paypal
account and we know basically _nothing_ about it ;-)
This is an important issue. We for example had to pay all costs for our
last developer meeting on our own but the general LyX donations
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 20:05, Christian Ridderström
christian.ridderst...@gmail.com wrote:
That being said Lars, I guess you received some money throughout the years
thanks to your paypal account and we know basically _nothing_ about it ;-)
Some of that money at least has been used to
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Some of that money at least has been used to sponsor LyX meetings. (Or
at least beer;-)
And once upon a time it bought us aussie.
Cool, I didn't know that.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström Mobile: +46-70 687 39
On 28/03/2009 20:09, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 20:05, Christian Ridderström
christian.ridderst...@gmail.com wrote:
That being said Lars, I guess you received some money throughout the years
thanks to your paypal account and we know basically _nothing_
On 28/03/2009 20:05, Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
That said, I do not think this is a bad thing, but I'd like to know
that the sponsorhip is for, special procjetcs etc.
You meant what the sponsorship is for I guess? Well, isn't it
clear? To
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Lyx.org has a traffic rank of: 168,508
The LyX Users:
United States16.2%
Germany13.5%
Sweden6.9%
Man, I must have spent a lot of time on the lyx site... ;-)
Seriously though, I didn't know there are that many Swedish users?
/C
--
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
It wasn't clear to me at least. By now I infer they're sponsoring a
certain feature. I would like more details on how they are to be cited
for it?
Well exactly as I did?
I guess I don't understand what's not clear...
Maybe I could figure it
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
And once upon a time it bought us aussie.
Well, all these details are in your memories, not a very transparent
process :-) Not that I care much really but I am trying personally to do
things as transparently as possible.
It's not easy doing
On 28/03/2009 20:07, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
That being said Lars, I guess you received some money throughout the
years thanks to your paypal
account and we know basically _nothing_ about it ;-)
This is an important issue. We for example had to pay all costs
for our last
On 28/03/2009 20:18, Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
It wasn't clear to me at least. By now I infer they're sponsoring a
certain feature. I would like more details on how they are to be cited
for it?
Well exactly as I did?
I guess I don't
Hi,
I need to get the user 'www-data' from 'lyx.org', 'www.lyx.org' or
'lyx.lyx.org' approved for sending messages to lyx-docs. How do I get this
done?
The wiki and the web site can send notifications when pages are modified,
but I guess the mailing list refuse their posts. Now, I can't (I
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
What's your excuse? ;-)
I am a family man and my wife is pregnant :-)
Congratulations!
sincere regards
/Christian
PS.
I am so impressed by all developers that make babies, since I know you do
this to increase the number of LyX users! I
On 28/03/2009 20:24, Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
And once upon a time it bought us aussie.
Well, all these details are in your memories, not a very transparent
process :-) Not that I care much really but I am trying personally to
do things as
Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
The people that sponsor abdel is listed at the page.
We had a rule earlier that if you wanted to be listed you had to say so in
your donation message.
Are potential sponsors informed about this before they send their donation? I'm wondering that
nobody did this
I accepted the inline spellchecker task but if anybody is interested
in the doc comparison task, I'll gladly gives the money. I know that
Vincent has started to think about it already. If I manage to have
some free time in the coming month, I would for sure try to
implement the feature.
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
chr wrote:
Author: chr
Date: Fri Mar 27 23:55:20 2009
New Revision: 28949
URL: http://lyx.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28949
Log:
Removed empty lines at end to get rid of warnings
Since i18n.inc is autogenerated, we should rather fix this in
vincent wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes schreef:
if anybody is interested in the doc comparison task, I'll gladly gives the
money.
Yes, I would really like to step in right now and indeed I've been
thinking about it for a while. Besides, the bugs are running out anyway.
It would also be nice if
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Could you drop the installers to
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming ?
They should be there.
Joost
chr wrote:
> Author: chr
> Date: Fri Mar 27 23:55:20 2009
> New Revision: 28949
> URL: http://lyx.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28949
>
> Log:
> Removed empty lines at end to get rid of warnings
Since i18n.inc is autogenerated, we should rather fix this in postats.py.
Jürgen
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > This patch customizes the color of the greyed-out-notes.
>
> Fine with me and this should also go to branch if possible.
I think this is a file format change. On reversion, the greyedout stuff needs
to be added to the preamble.
Jürgen
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> This patch fixes..
> * accelerator clashes,
> * missing accelerators,
> * strings (capitalization).
>
> Ok ?
Yes (if you think of branch as well).
Jürgen
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Juergen, do you have some standard list of things you check before
> tarballs are officially released?
Here's what I do:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ReleaseProcedure#toc7
> is it worth to add compilation
> test for the monolithic builds?
such as?
Jürgen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > I feel embarassed. Forget about it.
>
> That's too easy! We have the right to know!
What about this: generate i18n.inc in po/ and forget to copy it into the www-
user tree? Embarrassing enough?
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> The patch implements "Provides geometry 1" to those classes, with the
> effect that settings are ignored and the corresponding GUI widgets
> disabled.
>
> OK?
Since there were no objections, I committed to branch and trunk.
Jürgen
I've traced this to r28342. The bug that was meant to solve is
similar to this one, but it looks as if the fix for that one either
caused or revealed another bug. I think maybe what's happening is
that, under certain circumstances, we're hitting that new line over
and over, before the
Le 28 mars 09 à 10:44, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I feel embarassed. Forget about it.
That's too easy! We have the right to know!
What about this: generate i18n.inc in po/ and forget to copy it
into the www-
user tree? Embarrassing enough?
Not bad :)
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 18:52, rgheck wrote:
>
> Glad to see that's back. What are the plans for bugzilla now?
My plan is to get aussie moved to my place before doing anything.
Preferrable I'd like to do nothing with bugzilla.
I would have preffered a move to trac for the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Not bad :) Having to move those files explicitly is indeed a bit
> annnoying. I wonder
> whether it would work to make a non-symbolic link between po/i18n.inc
> and www-user tree.
That would be a good idea. And maybe let make update-po run make i18n.inc (or
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Richard heck schreef:
rgheck wrote:
rgheck wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
Here's the situation. Load the attached file. Nothing particularly
odd in it. Put the cursor at the end of the line marked "HERE". Now
use the scroll bar to scroll up several
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:30, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 18:52, rgheck wrote:
>
>>
>> Glad to see that's back. What are the plans for bugzilla now?
>
>
> My plan is to get aussie moved to my place before doing anything.
>
Dear LyX developers,
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only
thing they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for a
minimum of three years. I thought the deal was fair and the news text is
OK (http://www.beslist.nl/nieuws/82.html). Maybe I should
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 13:35, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Dear LyX developers,
>
> I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only thing
> they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for a minimum of
> three years. I thought the deal was fair
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 14:15, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 13:35, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
>> Dear LyX developers,
>>
>> I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only thing
>> they asked in exchange was to put a
As it stands now it seems that _you_ have got sponsorship to do
work on lyx,
that place some requirements on the LyX Project.
Well, this means that a company pay someone to get some work done for
LyX,
which is very close to what happens with other projects, for example. If
the company had
I am trying to get the bugzilla moved to trac now, so perhaps I can
have it
up and
working today if all goes well.
/me crossing fingers
JMarc
Le 28 mars 09 à 14:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Well, this means that a company pay someone to get some work done
for LyX,
which is very close to what happens with other projects, for
example. If
the company had contributed the code, we would have had no problem
acknowledging it (would
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €).
Do you have some context explaining why LyX was chosen, BTW?
JMarc
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only
> thing they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for a
> minimum of three years. I thought the deal was fair and the news text is
> OK (http://www.beslist.nl/nieuws/82.html). Maybe I
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 14:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> As it stands now it seems that _you_ have got sponsorship to do work on
>> lyx,
>> that place some requirements on the LyX Project.
>>
>
> Well, this means that a company pay someone to get some work done for LyX,
>
Abdelrazak Younes schreef:
Dear LyX developers,
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only
thing they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for
a minimum of three years. I thought the deal was fair and the news
text is OK
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Besides, the bugs are running out anyway.
Ha!
> It would also be nice if I could construct a somewhat larger feature to
> have something to be proud of.
I think your bugfixing is more than enough reason to be proud (having said
that, I certainly will not try to
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:30, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 18:52, rgheck wrote:
Glad to see that's back. What are the plans for bugzilla now?
My plan is to get aussie moved to my place
Note that if you put the call to LFUN_RECENTER/LFUN_SCREEN_SHOW_CURSOR
before the first call to textMetrics(), the crash disappears in all
cases. So it looks like a caching problem, initialization problem. That
is also supported by the fact that I don't see this at Windows. How was
it again,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef:
I've traced this to r28342. The bug that was meant to solve is
similar to this one, but it looks as if the fix for that one either
caused or revealed another bug. I think maybe what's happening is
that, under certain circumstances, we're hitting that new line over
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 15:22, rgheck wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:30, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 18:52, rgheck wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Glad to see that's
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes schreef:
Dear LyX developers,
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only
thing they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for
a minimum of three years. I thought the deal was fair and the news
text is
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Note that if you put the call to LFUN_RECENTER/LFUN_SCREEN_SHOW_CURSOR
before the first call to textMetrics(), the crash disappears in all
cases. So it looks like a caching problem, initialization problem.
That is also supported by the fact that I don't see this
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo