> Randy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Timothy Robinson
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 12:21 PM
> To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Question
>
>
> Make sure to bond
Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 12:21 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Question
Make sure to bond the copper water lines to the ground at the main panel.
> From: "R A Bennell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion
Make sure to bond the copper water lines to the ground at the main panel.
> From: "R A Bennell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:45:53 -0600
> To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another
cedes Discussion List'
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Question
Three thoughts. With a 240v the max voltage to ground is still 120v; the
240v only exists across the two power lines. But the current (for same hp
pump) would be halved, resulting in lower voltage drop. Second, I think yo
: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Question
> How about an outbuilding with only 2 wire service - hot and neutral -
> for 120V? Should I also have a ground rod?
> That is the situation with the pumphouse at the lake.
That's old enough that the pump/motor is
3:11 -0800
> To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Question
>
>> How about an outbuilding with only 2 wire service - hot and neutral -
>> for 120V? Should I also have a ground rod?
>> That is the situation with the pumphouse at the lake.
>
&
state developers and real estate agents
are beating a path to his door.
> From: Bill Ringgold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:48:02 -0500
> To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Ques
> How about an outbuilding with only 2 wire service - hot and neutral -
> for 120V? Should I also have a ground rod?
> That is the situation with the pumphouse at the lake.
That's old enough that the pump/motor is probably well-grounded
through the metal pipe to the water. Unless somebody has re
List
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:14:25 -0600
> To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Question
>
> --Managed to turn replacing the HVAC unit into a bathroom remodel
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new
Timothy Robinson wrote:
> Interesting note, if this was 50 years ago the lake house was wired, at that
> time often metal water lines were used as a primary ground ond a driven
> ground didn't exist. I've encountered such houses where at some time water
> lines were replaced and NO ground exists. M
Tim wrote < I admit that I'm quite "anal retentive" compulsive/obsessive
What scares me are the folks doing that work who are not that way. Take the
guy who did much of the work on my house, for instance. Or maybe I should say
"take him, please" so he doesn't do any more work aro
ply-To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:32:20 -0600
> To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Question
>
> Does your response suggest that you think it would work better to run 240V?
> That would mean changing the li
It seems than at Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:44:36 -0500, Timothy wrote:
> I'd hate to think you'd touck the pump motor someday and the
> "path of lease resistance to ground was through you.
That's what GFI (Ground Fault Interrupt) is for. It is
monitoring the current flowing out, vs the current returni
TED that we must have. I'm recalling the first seat belt
buzzers on car seats.
> From: "R A Bennell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:29:06 -0600
> To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
> Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of R A Bennell
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 18:32
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Question
Does your response suggest that you think it would work better to run 240V?
That
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Timothy Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 4:16 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Question
Oh, punching in 120V X 150' (one way) voltage drop calculator says s/b
minimum #6
riginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Timothy Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 4:35 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Question
You know, I can understand in emergency situations telling someone "this
isn&#
gt; Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:18:42 -0600
> To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Question
>
>
> Probably a really fine idea - sort of like Marshall and the MB - new fuses.
>
> Randy
>
>
umps in
300/400' wells.
I'd still want at least ground fault protection on any convenience outlets.
> From: "R A Bennell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:48:12 -0600
> To: "Mercedes Discuss
Probably a really fine idea - sort of like Marshall and the MB - new fuses.
Randy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Timothy Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 4:05 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:48:12 -0600
> To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Question
>
> Interesting. I have a similar sensation if not scenario. I have never rec
years. So far so good but I still wonder about more grounding.
Randy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Timothy Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 2:55 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Question
OH..
body was serving to complete the circuit for the
clock.
> From: "R A Bennell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:56:02 -0600
> To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Question
vered wires as the hot
> and neutral. Don't really need 240V at
> the pumphouse although I suppose the pump motor could be set to run on either
> voltage.
>
> Randy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Timothy
Randy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Timothy Robinson
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 5:31 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Question
If the feeder to the panel is four wire and the neutral and ground sep
The rebar in the concrete disperses better than an 8 foot rod hammered
into the ground.
Thanks, Tom
256-656-1924
-Original Message-
From: "archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
Sent: 12/17/07 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Qu
During the 1990s a new rule in the Code specified that the ground rod should
be tied to the rebar in the buildings concrete slab. This rule was added
about the time our house was built and I'm not sure if the electrician did
that. Do you know the reason for that rule?
Here in the lightning capita
IIRC, the old two wire housewiring systems, without a third wire, specified
a ground rod at an outbuilding panel, for example. What was the theory
behind that?
Gerry
.
> Allan Streib wrote:
>> So, if I have an outbuilding, wired into my main panel i
outbuilding is considered a
"sub-service" and there should be a driven ground.
> From: Allan Streib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:44:32 -0500
> To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generat
Actually, I stand corrected. I just pulled out some
of my old NEC manuals, and since a generator is
considered a power source in it's own right, it has to
be grounded separately. (head slap - I knew this, it's
been 10 years since I've done it)
In systems up to 400A 3 phase the neutrals can be
com
Actually, I stand corrected. I just pulled out some
of my old NEC manuals, and since a generator is
considered a power source in it's own right, it has to
be grounded separately. (head slap - I knew this, it's
been 10 years since I've done it)
In systems up to 400A 3 phase the neutrals can be
com
Lightening is nothing if not unpredictable.
Would you settle for a frame ground at the remote generator site that
is not connected to neutral?
-Dave Walton
On Dec 17, 2007 4:58 PM, LWB250 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One ground for one service drop.
>
> The NEC and other standards dictate that th
One ground for one service drop.
The NEC and other standards dictate that there be one
ground point common to a drop. Multiple grounds
create real havoc within the system, not to mention
the potential (no pun intended) for some serious
damage in a fault or lightning situation.
Dan (with 20 years
ecember 17, 2007 3:14 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Another Generator Question
It seems than at Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:56:47 -0600, R wrote:
> Should the generator itself be grounded? I can't help thinking
> that there should be a connection from the generator frame to
&g
Would that not "invite" the lightening strike on your outbuilding to
enter your house rather than be dissipated at the point of impact?
The path of least resistance is your house.
Is that a good thing?
-Dave Walton
On Dec 17, 2007 4:44 PM, Allan Streib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, if I have
Allan Streib wrote:
> So, if I have an outbuilding, wired into my main panel in my house,
> that outbuilding should not have a ground rod on *its* panel, but I
> should instead extend a ground from my house to the outbuilding?
Yep! Ground and neutral should also be kept separate until the main
p
So, if I have an outbuilding, wired into my main panel in my house,
that outbuilding should not have a ground rod on *its* panel, but I
should instead extend a ground from my house to the outbuilding?
Allan
Fmiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems than at Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:56:47 -0600, R
It seems than at Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:56:47 -0600, R wrote:
> Should the generator itself be grounded? I can't help thinking
> that there should be a connection from the generator frame to
> a good ground. I have considered driving a ground rod in and
> either keeping a ground wire on it all of the
Should the generator itself be grounded? I can't help thinking that there
should be a connection from the generator
frame to a good ground. I have considered driving a ground rod in and either
keeping a ground wire on it all of the
time or setting up something that would permit a quick ground con
39 matches
Mail list logo
