Re: iscsid(8) and FreeNAS 8.2.0

2012-10-11 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi all, On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 04:18:31 +0700, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 04:05:28PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi Misc@, Has anyone tried using OBSD iscsid(8) initiator and FreeNAS target? I was trying to do it on amd64 -current but so far unsuccessful. Best Regards

Re: iscsid(8) and FreeNAS 8.2.0

2012-10-11 Thread Insan Praja SW
crw--- 1 root wheel 90, 0 Oct 8 22:42 vscsi0 $ If not, cd /dev and ./MAKEDEV vscsi Insan Praja SW [insan.pr...@gmail.com] wrote: Hi Misc@, Has anyone tried using OBSD iscsid(8) initiator and FreeNAS target? I was trying to do it on amd64 -current but so far unsuccessful. Best

Re: iscsid(8) and FreeNAS 8.2.0

2012-10-11 Thread Insan Praja SW
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 23:34:03 +0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote: Do you have a /dev/vscsi0 ? $ ls -la /dev | grep vscsi crw--- 1 root wheel 90, 0 Oct 8 22:42 vscsi0 $ If not, cd /dev and ./MAKEDEV vscsi Insan Praja SW [insan.pr...@gmail.com] wrote: Hi Misc@, Has anyone

iscsid(8) and FreeNAS 8.2.0

2012-10-11 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, Has anyone tried using OBSD iscsid(8) initiator and FreeNAS target? I was trying to do it on amd64 -current but so far unsuccessful. Best Regards, Insan iscsi.conf -- target "Disk2" { enabled normal targetaddr 10.10.10.139 targetname "iqn.

Re: Panic on 1 oct 2012 kernel

2012-10-04 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 17:52:24 +0700, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote: On 4 October 2012 12:06, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi, Just got a panic from an nginx webserver of ours. Can produce "ps" and "trace" since ddb send "symbol unknown" when we send the comm

Panic on 1 oct 2012 kernel

2012-10-04 Thread Insan Praja SW
== 0" failed: file "../../../../kern/kern_lock.c, line 363 Stopped at Debugger+0x5: leave Thanks, Insan Praja SW OpenBSD 5.2-current (IMS-AMD64.MP) #3: Mon Oct 1 14:49:48 WIT 2012 r...@development.xxx.net:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP real mem = 2

Re: Compiling from the source on -current Failed

2012-09-24 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 01:09:10 +0700, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 07:52:44PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:29:25AM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: > Hi Misc@, > > I was just trying to upgrade to -current by compiling from the >

Compiling from the source on -current Failed

2012-09-24 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, Forgot one thing that on newer machine, this is not happening; Thanks, Insan Praja DMESG: -- OpenBSD 5.2-current (GENERIC.MP) #36: Mon Sep 24 00:28:08 WIT 2012 r...@yyy.xxx.zzz:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP RTC BIOS diagnostic error 80 cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X

Compiling from the source on -current Failed

2012-09-24 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, I was just trying to upgrade to -current by compiling from the source, on an old (6 years) server. I updated make(1) first to the latest (compiling from the source, of course) and compiling the kernel. Using the FAQ instruction, make(1) failed at; {standard input}: Assembler mes

Re: High RTT/Latency pings post 5.0 [SOLVED]

2012-09-04 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:35:38 +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi Misc@, Did anyone experience a high latency pings on em(4) interface post 5.0? We have several machines on i386 -current with em(4) experiencing high latency/RTT pings, and its really bothering our clients. Then we

Re: High RTT/Latency pings post 5.0

2012-08-30 Thread Insan Praja SW
VoIP are affected by this. Le 2012-08-29 10:59, Insan Praja SW a écrit : Hi Misc@, I had to add that the corresponding em(4) are (on all machines); em4 at pci4 dev 5 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82541GI)" rev 0x05: apic 5 int 17, address 00:15:17:49:04:0e em2 at pci3 dev 0 functi

Re: High RTT/Latency pings post 5.0

2012-08-29 Thread Insan Praja SW
15:17:25:0a:9d em1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000 PT (82571EB)" rev 0x06: apic 5 int 16, address 00:15:17:86:52:94 Thanks, Insan Praja On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:35:38 +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi Misc@, Did anyone experience a high latency pings on em(4) interfa

High RTT/Latency pings post 5.0

2012-08-29 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, Did anyone experience a high latency pings on em(4) interface post 5.0? We have several machines on i386 -current with em(4) experiencing high latency/RTT pings, and its really bothering our clients. Then we moved the traffic/vlan to sk(4) interface and pings goes to the expected

Building i386 -cureent Userland failed

2012-08-23 Thread Insan Praja SW
48 of /usr/share/mk/bsd.subdir.mk) *** Error code 2 *** Error code 2 *** Error code 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/src: Exit status 2 (build, line 80 of Makefile) Any hints how to fix this? Thanks, Insan Praja SW -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

Re: pf and ICMP in asymmetric routing setups

2012-06-13 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:07:31 +0700, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2012-06-12, Simon Perreault wrote: On 2012-06-12 14:08, Bernd wrote: I've got two OpenBSD 5.1-stable/amd64 boxes employed which do all the routing for our AS (OpenBGPd and OpenOSPFd). I see asymmetric traffic (I thought

i386 -current Sloppy source-track Breaks?

2012-06-13 Thread Insan Praja SW
rule 157/(match) [uid 0, pid 14104] pass out on vlan97: abc.def.ghi.198 > 203.190.abc.xyz: icmp: echo request (id:285b seq:0) (ttl 253, id Doesn't behave consistently. Some hosts/packets gets block, some get through, randomly. Thanks, Insan Praja SW DMESG (identical machines): OpenBSD 5.

Re: i386 -current Sloppy source-track Breaks?

2012-05-17 Thread Insan Praja SW
ja On Thu, 17 May 2012 03:11:33 +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi Misc@, I was upgrading my 5.0 i386 -stable to 5.1 i386 -stable. We use ECMP using ospfd, and asymmetric routing with bgpd. Strangely, "keep state (sloppy source-track) flags any" can't no longer pass icmp

i386 -current Sloppy source-track Breaks?

2012-05-16 Thread Insan Praja SW
inet proto udp to any port 33433 >< 33626\ keep state (sloppy source-track global) flags any\ queue ServDn_icmp Doesn't behave consistently. Some hosts/packets gets block, some get through, randomly. Thanks, Insan Praja SW DMESG (identic

Bad Checksum on i386-current

2012-02-11 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, Could someone elaborate me with this tcpdump I had? After nat-ing, checksum error shows, on the same packet.. rule 173.home.8/(match) [uid 0, pid 9731] pass in on vlan516: 172.16.33.254.64264 > 188.255.110.14.51413: S [tcp sum ok] 260322197:260322197(0) win 8192 [tos 0x28] (ttl

Upgrading AMD64 4.9-stable to 5.0

2011-12-19 Thread Insan Praja SW
pe 1 rasterizer library for UNIX/X11 tcl-8.5.9 Tool Command Language unarj-2.43p0extract files from ARJ archives unrar-4.02p0extract, list, and test RAR archives unzip-6.0 extract, list & test files in a ZIP archive wget-1.12p1 retrieve files from the web via HTTP, HTTPS and FTP xz-5.0.0LZMA compression and decompression tools zip-3.0 create/update ZIP files compatible with PKZip(tm) zoo-2.10.1p1handle the old .ZOO archive format Hope to see some input here. Thanks, Insan Praja SW -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

Panic on OpenBSD 5.0 -current 6 Aug 2011 GENERIC.MP

2011-08-06 Thread Insan Praja SW
syswq *3 0 0 0 7 0x40100200 idle0 2 0 0 0 3 0x100200kmalloc kmthread 1 0 1 0 3 0x80wait init 0 -1 0 0 3 0x200 scheduler swapper Thank You, Insan Praja SW -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

Re: Creating route tables

2011-07-21 Thread Insan Praja SW
e rtable? You need at least an interface on a desired rdomain, rdomain and rtable actually the same thing. You do that by using "ifconfig" to assign a spesific interface to an rdomain. Then bgpd can use it. On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi, You misse

Re: Creating route tables

2011-07-19 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, You missed rdomain. On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 01:26:37 +0700, Josh Hoppes wrote: I'm trying to configure bgpd to run in an alternate routing table so I can use it to manage black holed prefixes. When trying to specify an alternate routing table I get the error message "rtable id 1 does not ex

Panic On 29 May 2011 and 10 July 2011 i386 bsd.mp -current

2011-07-12 Thread Insan Praja SW
0 0 3 0x2100200 kmalloc kmthread 10 0 0 3 0x280 waitiit 0 -1 0 0 3 0x2080200 scheduler swapper DEBU

OpenBSD GENERIC.MP -current 29 May Snapshot and 10 July Snapshot Panic

2011-07-12 Thread Insan Praja SW
uhub6 at usb6 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1 isa0 at ichpcib0 isadma0 at isa0 com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo com1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot) pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot

Re: multicast routing and PIM-SM

2011-05-27 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Fri, 27 May 2011 19:53:15 +0700, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: Hi, I'm trying to forward multicast traffic through my firewalls using PIM-SM. Only DVMRP Are there any alternatives to XORP? Yes. dvmrpd (8). Is multicast_router=YES enough in rc.conf.local? regards, Giannis

Re: Intel I340-T2 (82580) on i386 -current

2011-05-26 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Thu, 26 May 2011 15:28:09 +0700, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 03:17:48PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi Misc@, Can't seem to forward any traffic via em0 and em1, an intel dual-port gigabit adapter. Dmesg shows that its detected, tried to plug it to another em

Intel I340-T2 (82580) on i386 -current

2011-05-26 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, Can't seem to forward any traffic via em0 and em1, an intel dual-port gigabit adapter. Dmesg shows that its detected, tried to plug it to another em's on another machines, no luck. The difference from GENERIC.MP is that ipmi is enabled. Thanks, Insan Praja SW DMESG

Re: How to check what traffic falls into default queue?

2011-05-25 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Wed, 25 May 2011 18:09:30 +0700, RLW wrote: Hello, I wonder how to check what traffic falls into default queue? I did this by creating an anchor and put all rules with default queue or without it (which automagically falls to default queue). best regards, RLW Thanks, Insan

Re: Building from the source -Current

2011-04-19 Thread Insan Praja SW
9, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote: > Hi Misc@, > Tried to build kernel from the source but something like this; > > $ sudo config GENERIC.MP > Don't forget to run "make depend" > Kernel options have changed -- you must run "make clean" > $ cd ../c

Re: Building from the source -Current

2011-04-19 Thread Insan Praja SW
. I wouldn't do make install until make is finished and no errors. This isn't something which can be automated for a beginner. The FAQ doesn't show it that way. On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi Misc@, Tried to build kernel from the source but somet

Building from the source -Current

2011-04-19 Thread Insan Praja SW
amp; sudo make && sudo make install rm -f eddep *bsd *bsd.gdb tags *.[io] [a-z]*.s [Ee]rrs linterrs assym.h make: don't know how to make machine/freebsd_machdep.h. Stop in /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP. What should I do? Thanks, Insan Praja SW -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

Re: /dev/pf permission for squid 3.2.0.6 on openbsd 4.8

2011-04-13 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, This link may help: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/OpenBsdPf Thanks, On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:12:51 +0700, Muhammad Muntaza wrote: 2011/4/8, Indunil Jayasooriya : Hi list, I am trying to test squid 3.2.0.6 on OpenBSD 4.8 (amd64) in transparent mode. I can browse i

Re: Reloading BGPd

2011-02-15 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 23:43:01 +0700, Peter Bristow wrote: Hi All, It appears that 'bgpctl reload' does not 'pickup' changes made to attributes specified in a network statement. This seems to be a change in behavior at least compared to 4.5. Is this a known problem or indeed expected

Re: question regarding bgpd

2011-01-27 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 01:31:41 +0700, PP;Q Q P(P8P?P8QP8P= wrote: Try "bgpctl sh fib | grep your_prefix" it's not there R0N0#bgpctl sh fib | grep 91.142.140 R0N0# it's reachable only via default route: R0N0#route -n get 91.142.140.254 route to: 91.142.140.254 destination: defa

Re: question regarding bgpd

2011-01-27 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:57:20 +0700, PP;Q Q P(P8P?P8QP8P= wrote: I tried to investigate a liitle... 1) how do I enable logging ? I used "log updates" and "-v" flag. not a bunch of diagnostics... 2) my AS is 49675, 91.142.140.0/24 at location "A" and 193.169.238.0/24 at location "B",

Re: [OOT] AMD64 4.8 -stable Symux graph spike everytime pf(4) reload

2011-01-22 Thread Insan Praja SW
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 04:20:04 +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi, On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 01:54:32 +0700, Willem Dijkstra wrote: On 01/22/2011 01:27 AM, Insan Praja SW wrote: Seems obvious that symux isn't detecting rollover properly for whatever variable you are seeing a graph "

Re: [OOT] AMD64 4.8 -stable Symux graph spike everytime pf(4) reload

2011-01-22 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 01:54:32 +0700, Willem Dijkstra wrote: On 01/22/2011 01:27 AM, Insan Praja SW wrote: Seems obvious that symux isn't detecting rollover properly for whatever variable you are seeing a graph "spike". It should be fairly easy for them to fix if you repo

Re: [OOT] AMD64 4.8 -stable Symux graph spike everytime pf(4) reload

2011-01-21 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:27:46 +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi all, On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:58:12 +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi, On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:48:24 +0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote: Seems obvious that symux isn't detecting rollover properly for whatever variabl

Re: [OOT] AMD64 4.8 -stable Symux graph spike everytime pf(4) reload

2011-01-21 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi all, On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:58:12 +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi, On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:48:24 +0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote: Seems obvious that symux isn't detecting rollover properly for whatever variable you are seeing a graph "spike". It should be fairly easy

Kernel panic at 7th January i386-current

2011-01-21 Thread Insan Praja SW
0x2000180 pool bgpd 23560 12733 12733 75 3 0x2000180 pool bgpd 12733 1 12733 0 3 0x280 pool bgpd 12200 29198 29198 85 3 0x2000180 kqread ospfd 15596

Re: LACP trunk load balancing hash algorithm

2011-01-19 Thread Insan Praja SW
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:10:33 +0700, Ted Unangst wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:40 PM, David Gwynne wrote: On 18/01/2011, at 11:25 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote: My november 21st i386.MP -current handles 1.3Mpps inbound and 1.3Mpps outbound packet during rootkits attacks on one of our

Re: LACP trunk load balancing hash algorithm

2011-01-19 Thread Insan Praja SW
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 06:40:59 +0700, David Gwynne wrote: On 18/01/2011, at 11:25 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote: My november 21st i386.MP -current handles 1.3Mpps inbound and 1.3Mpps outbound packet during rootkits attacks on one of our collocated costumer, on an 80Mbps traffic, via a vlan

Re: LACP trunk load balancing hash algorithm

2011-01-18 Thread Insan Praja SW
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:51:32 +0700, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:35:02PM -0500, Jason Healy wrote: I had a few hours to play with a hardware traffic generator today, I wanted to try beating up my OpenBSD setup to see what kind of throughput I could get. For the curiou

Re: [OOT] AMD64 4.8 -stable Symux graph spike everytime pf(4) reload

2011-01-16 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:48:24 +0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote: Seems obvious that symux isn't detecting rollover properly for whatever variable you are seeing a graph "spike". It should be fairly easy for them to fix if you report it. The fact that it affects 64bit and not 32bit counters

[OOT] AMD64 4.8 -stable Symux graph spike everytime pf(4) reload

2011-01-13 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, Has anyone encountered symux rrd graph spike on an AMD64 4.8-stable? I have a Cacti installed on an amd64 4.8-stable and i386 4.7-stable. Graph spike happens every time pf is reload (pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf) in an AMD64 machines, but doesn't happen on i386 4.7-stable. I see there is

Re: multicore processors gain

2011-01-10 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Sat, 08 Jan 2011 18:48:00 +0700, Landry Breuil wrote: On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Ted Unangst wrote: On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: I guess Landry doesn't read this list, or he could tell you how his experiment with parallel ports building on a

Re: ifconfig(8) bridge(4) ifcost not working?

2010-12-11 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Claudio@, On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:46:39 +0700, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 08:59:26PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi All@, Has anyone trying to set an interface cost on a bridge(4) devices? It doesn't seem to work to me. What I'm trying to do is to create a

ifconfig(8) bridge(4) ifcost not working?

2010-12-11 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi All@, Has anyone trying to set an interface cost on a bridge(4) devices? It doesn't seem to work to me. What I'm trying to do is to create a link with L2 redundancy. I can't use trunk due to the nature of multi operator network. So I create both vlan(s) on both links and higher the cost

Re: Daily digest, Issue 1987 (37 messages)

2010-12-02 Thread Insan Praja SW
et to the net, apart from that very reliable for me. Brett. Thanks, Insan Praja SW -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

Re: TP-LINK TL-WN722N

2010-11-30 Thread Insan Praja SW
idn't make it into a lot of products, is expensive, and these big USB dongles are boring and ugly. All the 802.11 USB devices made by Atheros have been quite disappointing. Damien Best Regards, Insan Praja SW -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

TP-LINK TL-WN722N

2010-11-30 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, Right now I'm trying to make this work in my OpenBSD machine. Google said that it is an otus(4) chipset (ATHEROS2)5416 and an ar9271 (Windows driver *.inf). I'd looked at the source code (if_otus.c, usbdevs, usbdevs.h, usbdevs_data.h) and add the product ID. compiling is easy but i

Re: Current fails to build

2010-11-08 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 03:01:34 +0700, Laurent CARON wrote: Hi, I'm trying to build current as of 2010 11 08. The build fails with: c cc -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/bind/obj -I. -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/bind/obj/lib/dns/include -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/bind/lib/dns/include -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/bind/

Re: MAC address filtering

2010-11-08 Thread Insan Praja SW
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:29:28 +0700, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:07:20PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Dear Misc@, Sorry on the previous message, wrong button pressed. to be continue, I will setup a bridge with only an interface that facing my office, and tag it in

MAC address filtering

2010-11-07 Thread Insan Praja SW
Dear Misc@, Sorry on the previous message, wrong button pressed. to be continue, I will setup a bridge with only an interface that facing my office, and tag it in accordance to ifconfig(8). In pf I'll simply pass this. Can I do that? Thanks, Insan Praja -- Using Opera's revolutionary email

MAC address-Based Filtering

2010-11-07 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, I need to filter based on MAC on my office network. The simplest thing right now for us is using a mikrotik system to filter MAC address. Base on man ifconfig, I can do it on a bridge device. So if I chose to use this approach, -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://w

Re: redistributing routes

2010-10-23 Thread Insan Praja SW
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:25:22 +0700, Tony Sarendal wrote: On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi Tony, On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:44:46 +0700, Tony Sarendal wrote: Is there a way to redistribute routes from BGP to OSPF using bgpd and ospfd ? on bgpd.conf you might

Re: redistributing routes

2010-10-23 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Tony, On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:44:46 +0700, Tony Sarendal wrote: Is there a way to redistribute routes from BGP to OSPF using bgpd and ospfd ? on bgpd.conf you might want to do this: match from $peer1 inet prefix xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/xx prefixlen bla_bla set rtlabel from_bgpd on ospfd.

No Livelock on 2 Oct 2010 current

2010-10-04 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, On this machine; OpenBSD 4.8-current (GENERIC.MP) #5: Sat Oct 2 21:06:09 WIT 2010 r...@border-rf.mygreenlinks.net:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP RTC BIOS diagnostic error f cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3220 @ 2.40GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2.41 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,D

Re: PF rtable on 1st July i386 -current not working

2010-07-05 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi All, On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 18:56:44 +0700, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:39:11PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi Misc@, Recently I've updated my routers kernel to 1t July i386 current. Rulesets like: pass in quick log on $int_if inet from to ! rtable 2 keep

PF rtable on 1st July i386 -current not working

2010-07-05 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, Recently I've updated my routers kernel to 1t July i386 current. Rulesets like: pass in quick log on $int_if inet from to ! rtable 2 keep state (sloppy source-track global) tag INTERNAL_OUT queue (internal int_ack) pass in quick log on $int_if inet proto {tcp udp} from to $d

Re: traffic management

2010-06-01 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 00:21:16 +0700, irix wrote: Hello Misc, Are there any plans have changed in the system of traffic control? For example removal of code altq from pf and make a separate management interface traffic other than pf. Or replace altq to something else, more fast, simple an

Re: Possible bug ? Re: 4.7 Release - bgpd not passing IBGP routes

2010-05-30 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Sun, 30 May 2010 02:34:12 +0700, a b wrote: Hi, Further to my earlier email, additional experimentation shows that removal of "set localpref" from my config file on BSD02 allows full mesh IBGP to correctly occur. Reinsertion of "set localpref" makes the issue originally reported r

Re: 4.7 Release - bgpd not passing IBGP routes

2010-05-30 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Sat, 29 May 2010 18:25:12 +0700, a b wrote: Hi, I've got a curious problem with a test I've been doing with bgpd on 4.7 release. Hopefully someone can point out where I am going wrong. Test Layout : BSD01 -> EBGP01 BSD02 -> EBGP01 BSDxx are both 4.7 release BGP speakers in private AS

Re: rdomain, mpe, ldpd, OpenBGPD and PF

2010-05-24 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Claudio, Thanks, I'll report back to you after I'm done with my first test. On Mon, 24 May 2010 20:11:46 +0700, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 05:23:00PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi Misc@, Before I begin to test OpenBGPD mpls VPN support on current, is there

rdomain, mpe, ldpd, OpenBGPD and PF

2010-05-24 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, Before I begin to test OpenBGPD mpls VPN support on current, is there any hints on route-leaking, and an example/hints to make a complete setup MPLS cloud and MPLS/VPN on a network. In my later experiences using OpenBSD, I use pf with rtable to make a VPN-like network without iso

Re: How to figure out the error location?

2010-05-24 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Mon, 24 May 2010 12:31:56 +0700, Bret S. Lambert wrote: On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:52:39AM +0200, Roger Schreiter wrote: Hi, we've been running a BGP router on OpenBSD for the months without problems. Now it crashed two times within 4 days. After the second crash, I could have a lo

Re: Mandoc Compiling Error

2010-05-21 Thread Insan Praja SW
On Sat, 22 May 2010 10:59:10 +0700, patrick keshishian wrote: look at "2010/05/09 - system Makefile changes" in the same current.html document. Viola, I guess I missed that one. I'll be careful next time. On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi Misc@

Mandoc Compiling Error

2010-05-21 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, I'm trying to update one of my machine to latest current, while compiling mandoc(1) to follow http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20100403 instructions I got the following error. $ cd /usr/src/usr.bin/mandoc/ $ sudo make obj Password: "Makefile", line 9: Malformed conditional (

Re: Using RDomain setup with pf(4) and bgpd(8)

2010-04-06 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi All, On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:27:33 +0700, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:42:05PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi Misc@, Has anyone try to setup bgpd(8) configuration with pf(4) specifically with rdomain? I'm trying to setup a simple VPN routing (VRF like) on openbs

Using RDomain setup with pf(4) and bgpd(8)

2010-04-06 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, Has anyone try to setup bgpd(8) configuration with pf(4) specifically with rdomain? I'm trying to setup a simple VPN routing (VRF like) on openbsd 4.7.i386-current (15 march 2010). RTFM-ing the manual, I could only come up with: 1. rtable on pf.conf is similar with rdomains. I do

Re: OSPFd on Feb 17th 2010 -current Incompatibilities

2010-02-18 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi all, On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:54:04 +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi All, On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:32:43 +0700, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:03:34AM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi Misc@, Recently I updated one of my routers into current. We runs OSPFd as an IGP for

Re: OSPFd on Feb 17th 2010 -current Incompatibilities

2010-02-18 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi All, On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:32:43 +0700, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:03:34AM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi Misc@, Recently I updated one of my routers into current. We runs OSPFd as an IGP for our network. The update went success, but OSPFd wont get synchronized

OSPFd on Feb 17th 2010 -current Incompatibilities

2010-02-17 Thread Insan Praja SW
7 Number of areas attached to this router: 1 Area ID: 0.0.0.0 Number of interfaces in this area: 1 Number of fully adjacent neighbors in this area: 0 SPF algorithm executed 3 time(s) Number LSA(s) 1 Thanks, Insan Praja SW -- insandotpraja(at)gmaildotcom

Re: BGPD on 06 Dec i386-current

2009-12-07 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Claudio and Misc@, On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:43:06 +0700, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 04:45:12PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi Misc@, Just updating my router to current, BGPd failed to start with the following messages: $ tail -f /var/log/messages Dec 6 16:25:03

BGPD on 06 Dec i386-current

2009-12-06 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, Just updating my router to current, BGPd failed to start with the following messages: $ tail -f /var/log/messages Dec 6 16:25:03 GreenRouter-JKT01 /bsd: root on wd0a swap on wd0b dump on wd0b Dec 6 16:25:02 GreenRouter-JKT01 savecore: no core dump Dec 6 16:25:07 GreenRouter-JKT0

Current pool size exceeds requested hard limit

2009-11-25 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, Currently having a significant problem on one of my machine. It behaves like this: $ sudo pfctl -nf /etc/pf.conf $ sudo pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf pfctl: Current pool size exceeds requested hard limit I had set options on pf.conf: set skip on {pfsync} set ruleset-optimization basic set

PF and Pool

2009-10-01 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, On -i386current, using systat I noticed some problems: on pf page, TYPE NAME VALUE RATE NOTES counter memory 14644826 170.04 on pool page, NAME SIZE REQUESTS FAILINUSEPGREQ PGREL NPAGE HIWAT

Re: PF-Changes: reply-to

2009-09-06 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Henning and Misc@, On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 21:21:15 +0700, Henning Brauer wrote: * Insan Praja SW [2009-09-06 16:10]: Hi Misc@, I can't seem to use this syntax any more: pass in quick log on vlan101 reply-to {(vlan101 a.b.c.14)} inet proto icmp from to vlan101:0 keep state (s

PF-Changes: reply-to

2009-09-06 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, I can't seem to use this syntax any more: pass in quick log on vlan101 reply-to {(vlan101 a.b.c.14)} inet proto icmp from to vlan101:0 keep state (sloppy source-track global) flags any tag INTERNAL_IN while this is working: pass in quick log on vlan101 reply-to {(vlan101 a.b.c.1

Re: 4.6 Release.. (and Something Else)

2009-08-13 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Stuart, Marco & misc@, On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:08:05 +0700, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2009-08-13, Insan Praja SW wrote: How do I migrate from 14 August 2009 current to 4.6 Release/Current?. libraries have been bumped since the 4.6 rel

4.6 Release.. (and Something Else)

2009-08-13 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, I'm planning on moving my 4.6-current to 4.6 release/stable, simply because I need to slow my self down since everytime there are fixes/commit to current source tree, I'm tempted to re-compile my kernel & userland, reboot and its not favorable to the company I work for. So I'm simp

Re: OSPFD + BGPD need to clarify behavior

2009-07-29 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:38:43 +0700, Ivo Chutkin wrote: Hallo Misc, I need some general clarification about OSPF and BGP behavior. I have tow border routers, border1(OpenBSD4.4 - stable)and border2(OpenBSD4.4 -stable), and one core router, core1(OpenBSD4.5 - stable). Each border route

Re: About em (4)

2009-07-15 Thread Insan Praja SW
ne had any experience with udp traffic on an em (4) jumbo frame setting, I'd love to hear them. On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi Misc@, From the em (4) man: BUGS There are known performance issues with this driver when running UDP traffic with Jumbo f

About em (4)

2009-07-13 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, From the em (4) man: BUGS There are known performance issues with this driver when running UDP traffic with Jumbo frames. Is this info still valid? Thanks, -- insandotpraja(at)gmaildotcom

No More Multi Routing Table on 4.6-current?

2009-07-07 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, After updating to i386 4.6-current, my multirouting tables is no longer working. I wonder if this because of the new rodomain thingy.. which is cool. So here it is. $ sudo route -T1 add default 202.149.83.213 route: writing to routing socket: Network is unreachable add net default:

i386-current 17th June 2009 BGPd FIB

2009-06-20 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@ and Claudio@, On 17th June kernel and userland, I experienced a really slow updates on FIB, while doing a BGP failover test. It's a simple test, I had 2 different internet peers, both sends full prefix. With the first scenario, when I shut the peer1 down, it still forwards to peer1.

The June 6th 2009 BGPD

2009-06-06 Thread Insan Praja SW
s errors, not reloading Anyway, this is a really good stuff your doin'.. Thanks for every bit of the OS, Sincerely, Insan Praja SW -- insandotpraja(at)gmaildotcom

Re: WebHosting Management Software

2009-05-30 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, On Fri, 29 May 2009 12:40:04 +0700, Lars Nooden wrote: Working with "web hosting" is easy. Put the OpenAFS client on your web team's macintoshes and then use it to access the directories hosted on your OpenBSD web server: http://www.openafs.org/macos.html Nice.. I'll te

Re: WebHosting Management Software

2009-05-28 Thread Insan Praja SW
On Fri, 29 May 2009 08:38:27 +0700, STeve Andre' wrote: On Thursday 28 May 2009 21:24:33 Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi Misc@, I'm currently looking for some OpenBSD-friendly (OpenSource/Free) WebHosting Management software. My colleagues seem to find a hardtimes for this kind of soft

WebHosting Management Software

2009-05-28 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, I'm currently looking for some OpenBSD-friendly (OpenSource/Free) WebHosting Management software. My colleagues seem to find a hardtimes for this kind of software works with OpenBSD. Any clue and input appreciated. Thanks, -- insandotpraja(at)gmaildotcom

[ON 23MAY i386 CURRENT] Can't View BGP RIB

2009-05-23 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, I'am currently running 23rd May i386-current, and I experience some booting speed up, and some changes in BGP, and yes, I'am aware of bgpd current code update. So, What I did was; $ bgpctl sh rib 129.128.0.0 flags: * = Valid, > = Selected, I = via IBGP, A = Announced origin: i = IGP

Re: The "match" syntax

2009-04-13 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@ and Stuart, On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:51:37 +0700, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2009-04-13, Insan Praja SW wrote: I'd like to ask if "match" syntax has entirely usable to option like rtable, queue etc. I use old syntax like "pass in from a.b.c.d/e to any rt

The "match" syntax

2009-04-13 Thread Insan Praja SW
valid syntax or I just have to replace with the "match" syntax. Thanks, Insan Praja SW -- insandotpraja(at)gmaildotcom

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-09 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Daniel and Misc@, On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 06:29:22 +0700, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Claudio Jeker wrote: Fell free to disagree, that's fair. Sorry, I don't get it a non-developer tries to educate a developer about how kernel crashes should be reported? Sorry most of your standpoints are j

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-09 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi All, On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:01:50 +0700, FRLinux wrote: On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote: I was clearly out of place. Same to you Steph, I shouldn't have reacted so quickly to your email address and have wrongly concluded to an other Linux quick miss place question

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-07 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Claudio and Misc@, On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 14:35:30 +0700, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 08:58:08PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Stefan Sperling wrote: On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:07:00PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi, On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57

Re: Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-06 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi, On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57 +0700, FRLinux wrote: On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote: Hi Misc@, on a i386 kernel recent build (6th march), I got panic. It says: Hello, As far as I know, home built kernel is not supported, you need to try out a snapshot instead and

Kernel Panic on 6th March i386 build

2009-03-06 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Misc@, on a i386 kernel recent build (6th march), I got panic. It says: uvm_fault(0xd08079c0, 0x0, 0, 1) -> e kernel: page fault trap, code=0 Stopped at pf_icmp_mapping+0x45: movw 0x4(%eax),%ax ddb> trace pf_icmp_mapping(dc2c5ba0,8,dc2c5b34,dc2c5b38,dc2c5b3c,dc2c5b3e,2) at pf_icmp_mapping+0x4

AMD64 24th Feb Panic uvm_pdaemon.c

2009-03-04 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Guys, I currently running AMD64.MP snapshot from 24th Feb '09. On the blue screen it says: Panic : kernel diagnostic assertion "uvmexp.swpgonly <= uvmexp.swpages" failed : file "../../../../uvm/uvm_pdaemon.c", line 575 ddb> trace Panic () at panic +0x122 __assert() at __assert + 0x21 uvm_a

  1   2   3   >