hello
does anyone know what to do with this problem, which happens
to me on Macintosh os X 10.1:
[localhost:/Applications/modperl-site-new] aju% bin/build -vf
#
### HTML DocSet: Home ###
#
+++ Reading cache from
same here, also on 10.1.
I got past that one by forcing the got_storable sub to return 0, just
out of curiosity, and was rewarded with complaints about the absence
of Pod::POM::View::HTML. which is certainly absent.
i imagine that a lot of the people you would most like to respond to
your
allan wrote:
hello
does anyone know what to do with this problem, which happens
to me on Macintosh os X 10.1:
I think the old cache files created on linux using Storable aren't
compat with osx. Try to delete them first:
% cd src
% find . -type f -name cache.html.dat -exec rm {} \;
Do
william ross wrote:
same here, also on 10.1.
I got past that one by forcing the got_storable sub to return 0, just
out of curiosity, and was rewarded with complaints about the absence of
Pod::POM::View::HTML. which is certainly absent.
This is a CPAN module. Please install it first.
Guys,
there have been several prior fits of new website creation threads on this
list. And it always seems to bring out the worst out of this list (remember
the first time, when someone said Stas was a nazi for trying to make the site
better ?).
This thread hasn't gotten into the worst bits
-Original Message-
From: Robin Berjon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
there have been several prior fits of new website creation
threads on this
list. And it always seems to bring out the worst out of this
list (remember
the first time, when someone said Stas was a nazi for trying
] new mod_perl site
-Original Message-
From: Robin Berjon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
there have been several prior fits of new website creation
threads on this
list. And it always seems to bring out the worst out of this
list (remember
the first time, when someone
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 03:27, Perrin Harkins wrote:
What about an additional requirement:
The site should be validated sucessfully by validator.w3.org
Maybe we should give the horse a chance to catch up to the cart...
Once there is a design that people are satisfied with, you are
Robin Berjon wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 03:27, Perrin Harkins wrote:
What about an additional requirement:
The site should be validated sucessfully by validator.w3.org
Maybe we should give the horse a chance to catch up to the cart...
Once there is a design that people are
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 16:55, Stas Bekman wrote:
Robin Berjon wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 03:27, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Maybe we should give the horse a chance to catch up to the cart...
Once there is a design that people are satisfied with, you are more than
welcome to
Robin Berjon wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 16:55, Stas Bekman wrote:
Robin Berjon wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 03:27, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Maybe we should give the horse a chance to catch up to the cart...
Once there is a design that people are satisfied with, you are more
If you[1] don't like the way the site is now,
don't bitch about it but change it completing the challenge.
Well, I'd be up to having a crack at it... Would you be ok publishing
the site with AxKit? Coding websites with it is so easy!
Robin, are you with me on that one?
Antoine
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 17:48, Antoine Quint wrote:
If you[1] don't like the way the site is now,
don't bitch about it but change it completing the challenge.
Well, I'd be up to having a crack at it... Would you be ok publishing
the site with AxKit? Coding websites with it is
Robin Berjon wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 17:48, Antoine Quint wrote:
If you[1] don't like the way the site is now,
don't bitch about it but change it completing the challenge.
Well, I'd be up to having a crack at it... Would you be ok publishing
the site with AxKit? Coding
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
Antoine Quint wrote:
If you[1] don't like the way the site is now,
don't bitch about it but change it completing the challenge.
Well, I'd be up to having a crack at it... Would you be ok publishing
the site with AxKit? Coding
At 10:44 am -0800 14/11/01, Nick Tonkin wrote:
No one doubts your commitment to mod_perl, or your hard -- and unpaid
-- work on the guide and many other things. But if you want to be a leader
who inspires people to collaborate and work as a team under your
direction, you'd do well to work on
At 10:44 AM -0800 11/14/01, Nick Tonkin wrote:
No one doubts your commitment to mod_perl, or your hard -- and unpaid
-- work on the guide and many other things. But if you want to be a leader
who inspires people to collaborate and work as a team under your
direction, you'd do well to work on
Nick Tonkin wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
Antoine Quint wrote:
If you[1] don't like the way the site is now,
don't bitch about it but change it completing the challenge.
Well, I'd be up to having a crack at it... Would you be ok publishing
the site with
Nick Tonkin wrote:
No one doubts your commitment to mod_perl, or your hard -- and unpaid
-- work on the guide and many other things. But if you want to be a leader
who inspires people to collaborate and work as a team under your
direction, you'd do well to work on bringing your people
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 01:31:52AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Obviously the site should be very light on graphics, but since you are
a good web designer you know this and all the other requirements
already. The only requirement we have is that this is an information
site, so avoid fancy
On Tuesday 13 November 2001 11:57, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 01:31:52AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Obviously the site should be very light on graphics, but since you are
a good web designer you know this and all the other requirements
already. The only requirement
What about an additional requirement:
The site should be validated sucessfully by validator.w3.org
Maybe we should give the horse a chance to catch up to the cart...
Once there is a design that people are satisfied with, you are more than
welcome to submit patches to fix validation problems.
As David Young has pointed out you can change the style.css in addition
to the template changes.
the one I've gave to you includes some old classes, which I'll remove,
so disregard those.
Thanks
_
Stas Bekman
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 01:31:52AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Obviously the site should be very light on graphics, but since you are
a good web designer you know this and all the other requirements
already. The only requirement we have is that this is an information
site, so avoid fancy
On Tuesday 13 November 2001 11:57, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 01:31:52AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Obviously the site should be very light on graphics, but since you are
a good web designer you know this and all the other requirements
already. The only requirement
What about an additional requirement:
The site should be validated sucessfully by validator.w3.org
Maybe we should give the horse a chance to catch up to the cart...
Once there is a design that people are satisfied with, you are more than
welcome to submit patches to fix validation problems.
3. Download the new mod_perl site source
http://www.apache.org/~stas/site/modperl-site-new.src.tar.gz
I've forgotten to include bin/build (which is the same as
DocSet/example/bin/build). So I've updated it now.
Thanks to Thomas Klausner for the alert.
As David Young has pointed out you can change the style.css in addition
to the template changes.
the one I've gave to you includes some old classes, which I'll remove,
so disregard those.
Thanks
_
Stas Bekman
3. Download the new mod_perl site source
http://www.apache.org/~stas/site/modperl-site-new.src.tar.gz
I've forgotten to include bin/build (which is the same as
DocSet/example/bin/build). So I've updated it now.
Thanks to Thomas Klausner for the alert.
29 matches
Mail list logo
