Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
The original message was received at Sun, 8 Jun 2003 23:22:26 +0100
from IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [212.22.195.7]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(reason: 553 5.3.0 Zone rejected due to abus
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, [koi8-r] éÌØÑ ûÉÐÉÃÉÎ wrote:
> Dear Sirs,
>
> I tried to follow apaci/README, but I couldn't compile mod_perl statically
> under FreeBSD.
>
> can anybody tell me (step by step ?) how to compile statically
>
> www/apache13-modssl + www/mod_perl ?
>
> Thanks!
> Ilia Chipitsi
Dear Sirs,
I tried to follow apaci/README, but I couldn't compile mod_perl statically
under FreeBSD.
can anybody tell me (step by step ?) how to compile statically
www/apache13-modssl + www/mod_perl ?
Thanks!
Ilia Chipitsine
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Steve Hay wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Steve Hay wrote:
> >
> >>Is there some other way, for Win32, to achieve what the
> >>PERL_USELARGEFILES=0 hack tried to do?
> >>
> >This seems hard to do without recompiling either the standard
> >Apache sources
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Steve Hay wrote:
Is there some other way, for Win32, to achieve what the
PERL_USELARGEFILES=0 hack tried to do?
This seems hard to do without recompiling either the standard
Apache sources (to enable large_files support) or else the
standard Active
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Steve Hay wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
> >
> >I've found the same thing - I believe it's because of the
> >USE_LARGE_FILES support that ActivePerl 8xx has enabled, and this
> >runs into a conflict with the standard Win32 apache-1 which
> >doesn't have such support (in the above
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Steve Hay wrote:
I'm having trouble compiling mod_perl 1.27 (with Apache 1.3.27 / Perl
5.8.0) on Windows (XP SP1 with MS VC++ 6.0 SP5).
It builds fine with Perl 5.8.0 standard sources, but I'm just trying to
upgrade my Perl to the slight
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Steve Hay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having trouble compiling mod_perl 1.27 (with Apache 1.3.27 / Perl
> 5.8.0) on Windows (XP SP1 with MS VC++ 6.0 SP5).
>
> It builds fine with Perl 5.8.0 standard sources, but I'm just trying to
> upgrade
Hi,
I'm having trouble compiling mod_perl 1.27 (with Apache 1.3.27 / Perl
5.8.0) on Windows (XP SP1 with MS VC++ 6.0 SP5).
It builds fine with Perl 5.8.0 standard sources, but I'm just trying to
upgrade my Perl to the slightly patched sources that ActivePerl Build
804 uses. I
Hi,
> > Looks like that corresponds to libapreq ; but I'm not too sure where to
> > get it. Is it included in the Apache release? Is it in apache-devel? I
> > have found a RPM for it, but now I'm not sure that's reliable either.
> > ¿Any idea?
>
> you have to install httpd-2.0, before you build
[please, post followups to the list! everybody else on the list wants to
know the answer, not only you. thanks!]
J. J. Merelo wrote:
Hi,
Looks like that corresponds to libapreq ; but I'm not too sure where to
get it. Is it included in the Apache release? Is it in apache-devel? I
have found a R
J. J. Merelo wrote:
Hi,
This new RH 8.0 installation is resulting in a calvary. After finding
that mod_cgi does not work, that the mod_perl that comes with it breaks
all scripts I've got, I have decided to build the latest apache version
and mod_perl from scratch. But looks like I am also bumping
Hi,
This new RH 8.0 installation is resulting in a calvary. After finding
that mod_cgi does not work, that the mod_perl that comes with it breaks
all scripts I've got, I have decided to build the latest apache version
and mod_perl from scratch. But looks like I am also bumping into
problems
1 November 2002 04:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: make error compiling mod_perl on RH7.1
Witchy wrote:
Hi all,
Trying to compile mod_perl 2.0 for my RH7.1/Apache 2.0.39 server and it
falls over with this error:
apr_perlio.c: In function `apr_perlio_apr_fi
> -Original Message-
> From: Stas Bekman [mailto:stas@;stason.org]
> Sent: 11 November 2002 10:24
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: make error compiling mod_perl on RH7.1
>
> I think moving to 5.6.1 from 5.6.0 should be very easy. I&#
useum
www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk - monthly gothic shenanigans
> -Original Message-
> From: Stas Bekman [mailto:stas@;stason.org]
> Sent: 11 November 2002 04:36
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: make error compiling mod_perl on RH7.1
>
>
> Witchy wrote:
>
Witchy wrote:
Hi all,
Trying to compile mod_perl 2.0 for my RH7.1/Apache 2.0.39 server and it
falls over with this error:
apr_perlio.c: In function `apr_perlio_apr_file_to_glob':
apr_perlio.c:573: `IoTYPE_WRONLY' undeclared (first use in this function)
apr_perlio.c:573: (Each undeclared identifi
Hi all,
Trying to compile mod_perl 2.0 for my RH7.1/Apache 2.0.39 server and it
falls over with this error:
apr_perlio.c: In function `apr_perlio_apr_file_to_glob':
apr_perlio.c:573: `IoTYPE_WRONLY' undeclared (first use in this function)
apr_perlio.c:573: (Each undeclared identifier is reported
Hi there,
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Kent, Mr. John wrote:
> Having trouble building mod_perl-1.27 against Apache_1.3.27 on an SGI
Have you looked at the file mod_perl-1.27/SUPPORT ?
Did you build the Perl installation on these machines?
Could you use a different compiler?
73,
Ged.
Greetings,
Having trouble building mod_perl-1.27 against Apache_1.3.27 on an SGI
Gettting:
Will run tests as User: 'webuser' Group: 'webgroup'
(cd ../apache_1.3.27 && CC="cc -n32" CFLAGS=" -D_BSD_TYPES -D_BSD_TIME -woff
1184 1552 -OPT:Olimit=0:space=ON -I/usr/local/include -DLANGUAGE_C"
./confi
Hi, I have installed Apache 2.0.42. When I run the configuration
script:
perl Makefile.PL MP_AP_PREFIX=$HOME/httpd/prefork MP_INST_APACHE2=1
I got error:
Unable to determine server version.
I believe the bug is in /mod_perl-1.99_05/lib/Apache/Build.pm Line 746:
next unless /^\#define\s+AP_S
Worked. Thanks.
Issac
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Kobes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Issac Goldstand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:37 AM
Subject: Re: Error compiling mod_perl/1.27/Apache-1.3.26/
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Issac Goldstand wrote:
> I keep getting the following error when compiling mod_perl under MS-Dev-6.0
>
> Constants.xs(158) : error C2065: 'errno' : undeclared identifier
>
> It's the only compilation error I'm stuck on, but I've bee
I keep getting the following error when compiling mod_perl under MS-Dev-6.0
Constants.xs(158) : error C2065: 'errno' : undeclared identifier
It's the only compilation error I'm stuck on, but I've been stuck for 2
weeks now... Everything is natively built for Wi
The subject more or less says it all. I've
found one bug report online which is pretty similar, but
does not say much about a solution:
http://citadelle.intrinsec.com/mailing/current/HTML/ml_apache-server-bugs/0424.html
The errors look like:
alloc.c: in function
'spawn_child_core':
alloc
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Vladimir Goncharov wrote:
> Hello All, I am failed to compile mod_perl on Win32 using
> "Apache mod_perl-1.xx installation instructions for Win32"
> from http://perl.apache.org/win32_compile.html
>
> Used software :
> Apache 1.3.26 + mod_ssl 2.8.9
> mod_perl 1.27
> ActiveP
Hello All,
I am failed to compile mod_perl on Win32 using "Apache mod_perl-1.xx installation
instructions for Win32" from http://perl.apache.org/win32_compile.html
Used software :
Apache 1.3.26 + mod_ssl 2.8.9
mod_perl 1.27
ActivePerl -5.6.1.631-MSWin32-x86
MS VC++
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Also why do you need to use MP_AP_PREFIX? Use MP_APXS= instead. You
> don't need Apache sources to build mod_perl as DSO.
MP_AP_PREFIX is not the source tree, it is the install tree. all modperl
needs is the include/ directory from the install tree, i
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Darragh Sherwin wrote:
> I did this with the enviromental varible CFLAGS=-DUSE_ITHREADS
...
> MP_CCOPTS=-DUSE_ITHREADS
you can't do that. and that is the source of your problems.
if you are going to use a threaded mpm, *perl* needs to be built with
ithreads enabled. perl
Darragh Sherwin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>> Darragh Sherwin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I am trying to compile mod_perl 1.99 with apacche 2.0.35, I give
>>> up with mod_perl 1.24 after numberous headaches and lots of profanties.
>>>
>>> It build configured Apache with following opti
Hi,
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Darragh Sherwin wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I am trying to compile mod_perl 1.99 with apacche 2.0.35, I give
>> up with mod_perl 1.24 after numberous headaches and lots of profanties.
>>
>> It build configured Apache with following options :
>>
>> ./configure --with-mpm=
Darragh Sherwin wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to compile mod_perl 1.99 with apacche 2.0.35, I give up
> with mod_perl 1.24 after numberous headaches and lots of profanties.
>
> It build configured Apache with following options :
>
> ./configure --with-mpm=prefork --prefix=/export/home/websit
Hi,
I am trying to compile mod_perl 1.99 with apacche 2.0.35, I give up with
mod_perl 1.24 after numberous headaches and lots of profanties.
It build configured Apache with following options :
./configure --with-mpm=prefork --prefix=/export/home/website/apache
--enable-so --with-por
Hi,
I'm having troubles when compiling mod_perl with 1.3_19. My configuration
is below and my problem is that I can't force mod_perl to use gcc as
compiler. On the creating process of Makefile, gcc is used as compiler, but
when I 'make', at the beginning it uses gc
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Joseph Crotty wrote:
> Ged,
>
> Thanks for the reply. The heart of the problem is we need to compile
> apache/mod_perl from source(i.e. apache_1.3.14.tar.gz and
> mod_perl1-1.25.tar.gz) which lives in cvs.
As Ged has mentioned, you need to read the guide:
http://perl.apache
Hi there,
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Joseph Crotty wrote:
> How do I compile so the apache perl modules get
> installed in a place of my choosing???
You can just copy them there yourself. Then all you have to do is set
the @INC paths so they can be found at runtime. I think you'll find
all you need
stuck if I want to compile with other than rootor
else edit the makefile.PL which sounds dreadful.
-Original Message-
From: G.W. Haywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 2:21 PM
To: Joseph Crotty
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: compiling mod_perl without ro
HI all,
Situation: I have compiled and installed apache_1.3.14/mod_perl-1.24 using
makepl_args.mod_perl. All this was done as root. But now of course that I
have the cgi software package dialed in and ready to delivere to production
my boss informs me that we need to be able to compile and del
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, andrewl wrote:
> Would the syntax for inclusion be
> %perl Makefile.PL < makepl_args.mod_perl
Nope. Just put the makepl_args.mod_perl file in the mod_perl
top-level directory, where you found Makefile.PL.
Then you just say:
% perl Makefile.PL
73,
Ged.
I've been otherwise occupied for a while and am finally able to spend a few
moments, once again, on trying to get mod_perl compiled into Apache.
I am using:
Apache 1.3.14
Perl 5.6.0
mod_perl-1.24_01
on Linux 2.2.16
I have a string of arguments that I would like to pass to the compile routine
at,
Hi all,
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Matisse Enzer wrote:
> Thanks, I'll try compiling perl with the Solaris compiler, and then
> Apache + mod_perl .
Check the List archives for stuff about Solaris recently,
I'm sure you'll find some useful pointers.
73,
Ged.
Thanks, I'll try compiling perl with the Solaris compiler, and then
Apache + mod_perl .
At 2:44 PM +0100 1/24/01, Jens-Uwe Mager wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 02:02:57PM -0800, Matisse Enzer wrote:
>>
>> This is a re-posting with a bit more information:
>>
>> I'm having trouble getting mod
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 02:02:57PM -0800, Matisse Enzer wrote:
>
> This is a re-posting with a bit more information:
>
> I'm having trouble getting mod_perl 1.24 to compile using the Solaris compiler.
>
>
> Compiler Version is: Sun WorkShop 6 2000/04/07 C 5.1)
> OS is: Solaris 2
This is a re-posting with a bit more information:
I'm having trouble getting mod_perl 1.24 to compile using the Solaris compiler.
Compiler Version is: Sun WorkShop 6 2000/04/07 C 5.1)
OS is: Solaris 2.7
Details:
For various reasons I'm using the Apache 1.3.12 source tree, and
I'm having trouble getting mod_perl 1.24 to compile using the Solaris compiler
(Version is: Sun WorkShop 6 2000/04/07 C 5.1)
Any ideas?
For various reasons I'm using the Apache 1.3.12 source tree, and I can compile
fine using gcc, but the Solaris compiler complains:
/opt/SUNWspro/WS6/bin/cc -c
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Jere C. Julian, Jr. wrote:
> I'm on a FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE box and I've just built and tested apache
> 1.3.14 from source. Then I try to build mod_perl with the following
> commands and get the errors below.
...
> Symbol.xs:106: `na' undeclared (first use this function)
> Sym
eph Crotty [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday,November 28,2000 12:03 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: compiling mod_perl-1.24
>
> I am on a sun box:
>
> uname -a
>
> SunOS mailroom 5.6 Generic_105181-22 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10
>
I am on a sun box:
uname -a
SunOS mailroom 5.6 Generic_105181-22 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10
I built and tested both perl 5.6.0 and apache_1.3.9 against gcc and they
check out OK:
gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.6/2.7.2.2/specs
gcc version 2.7.2.2
perl -V
glad to help
would anyone else be interested in a FreeBSD port to do this ??
At 02:23 PM 22/11/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Thanks! I finally did a dirty hack but this sounds like a good way to
>fix it right. I'll have to do that as soon as I get a chance.
>
>-Jere
>
>peter brown wrote:
> >
> > hi jer
I'm on a FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE box and I've just built and tested apache
1.3.14 from source. Then I try to build mod_perl with the following
commands and get the errors below.
The full text of the process can be seen at
http://www.StageRigger.com/mod_perl-1.24_01.log
Has anyone run into this? Su
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Laurent Perez wrote:
> Hi list
>
> I can't get mod_perl to compile with my apache_source.
> I always get ' /usr/bin/ld : cannot find -lgdbm : No such file or
> directory ' with 'make'.
> I'm running a Debian 2.2 box, i added /usr/lib to ld.so.conf, and
> libgdbmg1 is insta
Hi list
I can't get mod_perl to compile with my apache_source.
I always get ' /usr/bin/ld : cannot find -lgdbm : No such file or
directory ' with 'make'.
I'm running a Debian 2.2 box, i added /usr/lib to ld.so.conf, and
libgdbmg1 is installed.
Thanks for your answer
Laurent
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Joseph Sirucka - Netics wrote:
> Hi People
>
> I've been trying to compile mod_perl for solaris 8 recently and I
> recompiled perl 5.6.0 with _ubincompat5005 and -Uuselargefiles.
>
> But no matter what I do with with mod_perl to compile it at
> perl Makefile.PL blah i get th
Hi People
I've been trying to compile mod_perl for solaris 8 recently and I
recompiled perl 5.6.0 with _ubincompat5005 and -Uuselargefiles.
But no matter what I do with with mod_perl to compile it at
perl Makefile.PL blah i get this error
ld.so.1: perl: fatal: relocation error: file
/usr/local/
can anyone be so kind to point out what i'm doing wrong ;o)
[beast]/home/beast/daniel/src/perl/mod_perl-1.24{139} root : make
(cd ../apache_1.3.12/src && make CC="cc";)
===> os/unix
<=== os/unix
===> ap
<=== ap
===> main
cc -c -I.. -I/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.0/sun4-solaris/CORE -I../os/unix -I..
Frank D. Cringle writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William R. Ward) writes:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> >please use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list for support questions.
>>
>> Then please put that e-mail address somewhere obvious on the
>> perl.apache.org website. Yours was the only one I could find.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William R. Ward) writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >please use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list for support questions.
>
> Then please put that e-mail address somewhere obvious on the
> perl.apache.org website. Yours was the only one I could find.
> (It was listed as [EMAIL PROT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, William R. Ward wrote:
>
>>
>> When I try to run "perl Makefile.PL" I get this error:
>>
>> sh: ./Configure: No such file or directory
>> can't open /Makefile No such file or directory at Makefile.PL line 617,
>chunk 1.
>>
>> The "configure" scri
Hi!
Has anyone had problems compiling mod_perl 1.24 on HP-UX 10.20? No
matter what parameters are passed to perl Makefile.PL, the make is
stopped:
ld -b -s -a shared -o libperl.so mod_perl.lo perlxsi.lo
perl_config.lo perl_util.lo perlio.lo mod_perl_opmask.lo Apache.lo
Constants.lo
Hi all-
I'm trying to build mod_perl 1.21_02 (w/ apache 1.3.12) with GD statically
linked.
I've tried running
perl Makefile.PL PERL_STATIC_EXTS='GD' EVERYTHING=1 USE_APACI=1
APACI_ARGS='--prefix=/usr/local/bb/httpd, --enable-module=proxy'
and I get:
gcc -DLINUX=2 -DMOD_PERL -DUSE_PER
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Fred Miller wrote:
> Thank you very much. Sorry for being such a newbie.
no need to apologize, this sort of problem isn't normal, if anyone should
say sorry, it's sun for their flawed compiler kit.
> I rebuilt Perl with gcc, and then was able to get a build of Apache with
Doug MacEachern wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 May 2000, Fred Miller wrote:
>
> > Like I said, I'm a bit naive in these matters. I didn't specify using
> > gcc or cc. I used the same path to compile Perl, Apache, and Mod_Perl.
> > When I aaksed which gcc and which cc, my machine does report gcc
> > appea
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Fred Miller wrote:
> Like I said, I'm a bit naive in these matters. I didn't specify using
> gcc or cc. I used the same path to compile Perl, Apache, and Mod_Perl.
> When I aaksed which gcc and which cc, my machine does report gcc
> appearing in my path ahead of cc. Could tha
Fred Miller wrote:
>
> Doug MacEachern wrote:
> >looking at the line number, i would try replacing any occurance of:
> >
> > perl_eval_sv -> eval_sv
> > perl_call_sv -> call_sv
> > perl_call_pv -> call_pv
>
> I wish I was experienced enough to know what this means.
Now I think I'm starting to
Doug MacEachern wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 May 2000, Fred Miller wrote:
> > I am experiencing what appears to be a very similar problem, but with
> > more recent modules and OS. I am running mod_perl 1.24, Perl 5.6.0,
> > Apache 1.3.12, Solaris 2.6
>
> perl -V would help. is your cc gcc or sun's?
#
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Fred Miller wrote:
> On 4/26/2000, Steve Hay wrote about "Problem compiling mod_perl 1.23 on
> Solaris 2.4"
>
> I am experiencing what appears to be a very similar problem, but with
> more recent modules and OS. I am running mod_perl 1.24, Pe
On 4/26/2000, Steve Hay wrote about "Problem compiling mod_perl 1.23 on
Solaris 2.4"
I am experiencing what appears to be a very similar problem, but with
more recent modules and OS. I am running mod_perl 1.24, Perl 5.6.0,
Apache 1.3.12, Solaris 2.6
Perl Makefile.PL with op
John D Groenveld wrote:
> -Xa is a Sun WorkShop Compiler C 4.2 option,
> -X[a|c|s|t]
> Specifies the degree of conformance to the ANSI C stan-
> dard. Specifies one of the following:
>
> a (ANSI)
>ANSI C plus K&R C compatibility extensions, wi
-Xa is a Sun WorkShop Compiler C 4.2 option,
-X[a|c|s|t]
Specifies the degree of conformance to the ANSI C stan-
dard. Specifies one of the following:
a (ANSI)
ANSI C plus K&R C compatibility extensions, with
semantic changes re
ny problems. (I haven't tried yet combining both mod_ssl and
> mod_jserv with Apache.)
> I've tried using mod_perl to build Apache and the third party modules.
> I've also tried compiling mod_perl independantly and the compile Apache
> with the other modules. When I try to c
jserv with Apache.)
I've tried using mod_perl to build Apache and the third party modules.
I've also tried compiling mod_perl independantly and the compile Apache
with the other modules. When I try to compile the parts independantly,
mod_perl always comes back with errors stating unde
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Steve Hay wrote:
> Steve Hay wrote:
>
> > I'm having a problem compiling mod_perl 1.23 (with Apache 1.3.12 / Perl
> > 5.6.0) as a DSO using APXS on Solaris 2.4.
>
> In case anyone is interested...
>
> I've solved my own problem
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Jean-Sebastien Morisset wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I first tried to compile mod_perl-1.22 using APXS, but whenever I would
> load the module, the Apache child would die.
>
> Here's the command line I used:
>
> perl Makefile.PL NO_HTTPD=1 E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I first tried to compile mod_perl-1.22 using APXS, but whenever I would
load the module, the Apache child would die.
Here's the command line I used:
perl Makefile.PL NO_HTTPD=1 EVERYTHING=1
WITH_APXS=/opt/apache-1.3.12/bin/apxs USE_APXS=1
I then tr
Good For you buddie:)
We know that you can do that... ;)
bybye
Nazareno
Perl Programmer www.obsequie.com
Steve Hay wrote:
> I'm having a problem compiling mod_perl 1.23 (with Apache 1.3.12 / Perl
> 5.6.0) as a DSO using APXS on Solaris 2.4.
In case anyone is interested...
I've solved my own problem (just as well, really). If I re-compile
everything with the -Xa compiler flag t
Hi,
I'm having a problem compiling mod_perl 1.23 (with Apache 1.3.12 / Perl
5.6.0) as a DSO using APXS on Solaris 2.4. This worked fine using
Apache 1.3.6 / Perl 5.005_03 / mod_perl 1.22.
Can anybody help?
I built the Perl with "-Uusemymalloc" which I had found was nece
Hi,
I've just been building Perl 5.6.0 / mod_perl 1.23 / Apache 1.3.12 on
Windows NT and found something which may be of some use.
The Apache installation does not seem to copy the headers and library
files from the build directory into the install directory (which it DOES
on Unix), so to build
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Kenneth Lee wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I tried to compile mod_perl with Apache on RedHat 6.1 and perl
> 5.005_03, it gave me thousands of unresolved references when compiling
> httpd.c. I then went thru the FAQs on the Web, and it told me that my
> perl maybe corrupted. Then I
Hi all,
I tried to compile mod_perl with Apache on RedHat 6.1 and perl
5.005_03, it gave me thousands of unresolved references when compiling
httpd.c. I then went thru the FAQs on the Web, and it told me that my
perl maybe corrupted. Then I go to grab the latest perl 5.6.0 source,
compiled an
Geoffrey Young wrote:
> > ---make test error---
> > Syntax error on line 30 of
> > /usr/src/mod_perl-1.21_03/t/conf/httpd.conf:
> > Invalid command '=pod', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not
> > included in the server configuration
> > done
> >
Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Sam Carleton wrote:
>
> > This is the error message I got when I compiled mod_perl:
> >
> > Perl lib version (5.00503) doesn't match executable version (5.006) at
> > /usr/lib/perl5/5.00503/i586-linux/Config.pm line 7.
>
> you either installed a new P
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Sam Carleton wrote:
> This is the error message I got when I compiled mod_perl:
>
> Perl lib version (5.00503) doesn't match executable version (5.006) at
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.00503/i586-linux/Config.pm line 7.
you either installed a new Perl after running mod_perl's Makefile
This is the error message I got when I compiled mod_perl:
Perl lib version (5.00503) doesn't match executable version (5.006) at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.00503/i586-linux/Config.pm line 7.
Compilation failed in require at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.00503/ExtUtils/MakeMaker.pm line 13.
BEGIN failed--compilation abo
>> Question:
>> ADD_MODULE=log_referer,rewrite,proxy,so,vhost_alias,mime_magic,expires
>>
>> Is this required? Why can't I just use APACI_ARGS to get 'all' ?
>
> While I don't build apache very often, I don't see what configure option
> that corresponds to. You'd have to have:
>
> APACI_ARGS=
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Bill Jones wrote:
> Thanks for responding :)
>
> Question:
> ADD_MODULE=log_referer,rewrite,proxy,so,vhost_alias,mime_magic,expires
>
> Is this required? Why can't I just use APACI_ARGS to get 'all' ?
While I don't build apache very often, I don't see what configure optio
Jan 2000 17:19:55 +
> To: Bill Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Compiling mod_perl as a DSO?
>
> I'm not sure why people are struggling with this so much this week. Here's
> what to do in a nutshell:
>
> download and un
uxPPC, BeOS...
>
>
> > From: Bill Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 09:42:16 -0500
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Compiling mod_perl as a DSO?
> >
> >>> Is it possible to compile/install mod_perl as a DSO, on
IL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 09:42:16 -0500
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Compiling mod_perl as a DSO?
>
>>> Is it possible to compile/install mod_perl as a DSO, on an existing
>>> pre-compiled copy of apache (with mod_so enabled), yet? I
>> Is it possible to compile/install mod_perl as a DSO, on an existing
>> pre-compiled copy of apache (with mod_so enabled), yet? If so,
>> how? I couldnt find it in the docs... and I'm tired of having to
>> statically compile the module in... so any help would be appreciated.
>>
> I read on th
On Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 10:37:24PM -0800, Michael Robinton wrote:
> I read on the list at one time that the DSO verson has a memory leak.
> Don't know if this is still true or not. The static version apparently
> did not have that problem. If someone knows the answer to this I'd like
> to know
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Bill Bradford wrote:
> Is it possible to compile/install mod_perl as a DSO, on an existing
> pre-compiled copy of apache (with mod_so enabled), yet? If so,
> how? I couldnt find it in the docs... and I'm tired of having to
> statically compile the module in... so any help
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Bill Bradford wrote:
> Is it possible to compile/install mod_perl as a DSO, on an existing
> pre-compiled copy of apache (with mod_so enabled), yet? If so,
> how? I couldnt find it in the docs... and I'm tired of having to
> statically compile the module in... so any help
Is it possible to compile/install mod_perl as a DSO, on an existing
pre-compiled copy of apache (with mod_so enabled), yet? If so,
how? I couldnt find it in the docs... and I'm tired of having to
statically compile the module in... so any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Bill
--
+
On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> attached you find a somewhat larger patch as a first step in order to
> get mod_perl running with ActivePerl. This is mainly to get the public
> source tree in sync with my work: I am still far away from getting it
> running. What I did so
I want to that all of your for your speedy reply and really good advice.
Although I originally had used GCC to compile perl (and was the same
compiler I was trying to use for mod_perl). By recompiling the perl source
it seemed to fix whatever problem I was having before...perhaps I screwed up
wit
On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Craig Vincent wrote:
> I must have now installed mod_perl a dozen times on a dozen machines
> and this is the first time I've come across this problem and I can't
> seem to solve it...nor have I had any luck through FAQs, DejaNews or
> even newsgroup postings :(
> Has anyone
This looks just like what I saw when I built it on my RH 6.0 setup.
I recompiled Perl first and it fixed this.
I think what is going on here is that the make file is determing what
compiler that Perl was compiled with (cc in this case) and using that
to compile Mod_Perl. I read somewhere tha
> I must have now installed mod_perl a dozen times on a dozen machines and
this is the first time I've come across this problem and I can't seem to
solve it...nor have I had any luck through FAQs, DejaNews or even newsgroup
postings :(
>
> I have an RH Linux 6.1 box. I currently have Apache 1.
I must have now installed mod_perl a dozen times on
a dozen machines and this is the first time I've come across this problem and I
can't seem to solve it...nor have I had any luck through FAQs, DejaNews or even
newsgroup postings :(
I have an RH Linux 6.1 box. I currently have
Apache 1.3
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
