Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-13 Thread Stas Bekman
As David Young has pointed out you can change the style.css in addition to the template changes. the one I've gave to you includes some old classes, which I'll remove, so disregard those. Thanks _ Stas Bekman JAm

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-13 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 01:31:52AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > Obviously the site should be very light on graphics, but since you are > a good web designer you know this and all the other requirements > already. The only requirement we have is that this is an information > site, so avoid fanc

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-13 Thread tom poe
On Tuesday 13 November 2001 11:57, Thomas Klausner wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 01:31:52AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > > Obviously the site should be very light on graphics, but since you are > > a good web designer you know this and all the other requirements > > already. The only req

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-13 Thread Perrin Harkins
> What about an additional requirement: > > The site should be validated sucessfully by validator.w3.org Maybe we should give the horse a chance to catch up to the cart... Once there is a design that people are satisfied with, you are more than welcome to submit patches to fix validation problem

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-13 Thread Stas Bekman
> 3. Download the new mod_perl site source > http://www.apache.org/~stas/site/modperl-site-new.src.tar.gz I've forgotten to include bin/build (which is the same as DocSet/example/bin/build). So I've updated it now. Thanks to Thomas Klausner for the alert. --

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-14 Thread Robin Berjon
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 03:27, Perrin Harkins wrote: > > What about an additional requirement: > > > > The site should be validated sucessfully by validator.w3.org > > Maybe we should give the horse a chance to catch up to the cart... > > Once there is a design that people are satisfied with

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Robin Berjon wrote: > On Wednesday 14 November 2001 03:27, Perrin Harkins wrote: > >>>What about an additional requirement: >>> >>>The site should be validated sucessfully by validator.w3.org >>> >>Maybe we should give the horse a chance to catch up to the cart... >> >>Once there is a design tha

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-14 Thread Robin Berjon
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 16:55, Stas Bekman wrote: > Robin Berjon wrote: > > On Wednesday 14 November 2001 03:27, Perrin Harkins wrote: > >>Maybe we should give the horse a chance to catch up to the cart... > >> > >>Once there is a design that people are satisfied with, you are more than > >>

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Robin Berjon wrote: > On Wednesday 14 November 2001 16:55, Stas Bekman wrote: > >>Robin Berjon wrote: >> >>>On Wednesday 14 November 2001 03:27, Perrin Harkins wrote: >>> Maybe we should give the horse a chance to catch up to the cart... Once there is a design that people are satisf

RE: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-14 Thread Antoine Quint
>If you[1] don't like the way the site is now, >don't bitch about it but change it completing the challenge. Well, I'd be up to having a crack at it... Would you be ok publishing the site with AxKit? Coding websites with it is so easy! Robin, are you with me on that one? Antoine

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-14 Thread Robin Berjon
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 17:48, Antoine Quint wrote: > >If you[1] don't like the way the site is now, > >don't bitch about it but change it completing the challenge. > > Well, I'd be up to having a crack at it... Would you be ok publishing > the site with AxKit? Coding websites with i

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Antoine Quint wrote: >> If you[1] don't like the way the site is now, >> don't bitch about it but change it completing the challenge. > > Well, I'd be up to having a crack at it... Would you be ok publishing > the site with AxKit? Coding websites with it is so easy! Antoine, reread my o

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Robin Berjon wrote: > On Wednesday 14 November 2001 17:48, Antoine Quint wrote: > >>> If you[1] don't like the way the site is now, >>> don't bitch about it but change it completing the challenge. >>> >>Well, I'd be up to having a crack at it... Would you be ok publishing >>the site with AxK

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-14 Thread Nick Tonkin
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > Antoine Quint wrote: > > >> If you[1] don't like the way the site is now, > >> don't bitch about it but change it completing the challenge. > > > > Well, I'd be up to having a crack at it... Would you be ok publishing > > the site with AxKit? C

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-14 Thread william ross
At 10:44 am -0800 14/11/01, Nick Tonkin wrote: >No one doubts your commitment to mod_perl, or your hard -- and unpaid >-- work on the guide and many other things. But if you want to be a leader >who inspires people to collaborate and work as a team under your >direction, you'd do well to work on b

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-14 Thread Robert Landrum
At 10:44 AM -0800 11/14/01, Nick Tonkin wrote: >No one doubts your commitment to mod_perl, or your hard -- and unpaid >-- work on the guide and many other things. But if you want to be a leader >who inspires people to collaborate and work as a team under your >direction, you'd do well to work on b

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Nick Tonkin wrote: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > > >>Antoine Quint wrote: >> >> >> If you[1] don't like the way the site is now, >> >> don't bitch about it but change it completing the challenge. >> > >> > Well, I'd be up to having a crack at it... Would you be ok publishing >

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-14 Thread Adi Fairbank
Nick Tonkin wrote: > > No one doubts your commitment to mod_perl, or your hard -- and unpaid > -- work on the guide and many other things. But if you want to be a leader > who inspires people to collaborate and work as a team under your > direction, you'd do well to work on bringing your people s

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-15 Thread Robin Berjon
Guys, there have been several prior fits of "new website creation" threads on this list. And it always seems to bring out the worst out of this list (remember the first time, when someone said Stas was a nazi for trying to make the site better ?). This thread hasn't gotten into the worst bits

RE: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-15 Thread Matt Sergeant
> -Original Message- > From: Robin Berjon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > there have been several prior fits of "new website creation" > threads on this > list. And it always seems to bring out the worst out of this > list (remember > the first time, when someone said Stas was a nazi f

RE: [challenge] new mod_perl site

2001-11-15 Thread Joe Breeden
OTECTED] > Subject: RE: [challenge] new mod_perl site > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Robin Berjon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > there have been several prior fits of "new website creation" > > threads on this > > list. And it

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site - [OT]

2001-11-16 Thread allan
hello does anyone know what to do with this problem, which happens to me on Macintosh os X 10.1: [localhost:/Applications/modperl-site-new] aju% bin/build -vf # ### HTML DocSet: Home ### # +++ Reading cache from /Applications/modperl-site-new/bin/

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site - [OT]

2001-11-16 Thread william ross
same here, also on 10.1. I got past that one by forcing the got_storable sub to return 0, just out of curiosity, and was rewarded with complaints about the absence of Pod::POM::View::HTML. which is certainly absent. i imagine that a lot of the people you would most like to respond to your cha

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site - [OT]

2001-11-16 Thread Stas Bekman
allan wrote: > hello > > does anyone know what to do with this problem, which happens > to me on Macintosh os X 10.1: I think the old cache files created on linux using Storable aren't compat with osx. Try to delete them first: % cd src % find . -type f -name cache.html.dat -exec rm {} \; D

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site - [OT]

2001-11-16 Thread Stas Bekman
william ross wrote: > same here, also on 10.1. > > I got past that one by forcing the got_storable sub to return 0, just > out of curiosity, and was rewarded with complaints about the absence of > Pod::POM::View::HTML. which is certainly absent. This is a CPAN module. Please install it first

Re: [challenge] new mod_perl site - [OT]

2001-11-17 Thread allan
works ! thanks allan Stas Bekman wrote: > > allan wrote: > > > hello > > > > does anyone know what to do with this problem, which happens > > to me on Macintosh os X 10.1: > > I think the old cache files created on linux using Storable aren't > compat with osx. Try to delete them first: > >