Chris Hoess wrote:
> you're trying to prevent some programming running as root (I assume we're
> in a Win 9.x environment here) from getting data it wants in the system.
> Making Mozilla cleverer at hiding data is pretty clearly a stopgap
> solution; the solution is installing a personal firew
Mike
There''s a nug report on this error. It relates to earlier versions
of Mozilla being left on the machine. Also comes up when you're trying
to send forms.
Try a complete uninstall and reinstall. Works fine on Win 2k here -
once I did that.
Jerry Baker wrote:
Mike Koenecke wrote:
>
> On or
Bob Davis wrote:
> I thought when I dl'ed the jre before I was using mozilla that it was
> supposed to replace the jre that navigator used. In fact I see the
> plug-ins in the navigator plug-in directory. How do I verify which jre
> version netscape is running? How did you do it?
>
> thanks
> bob
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, RV says...
>
>
>
>Peter Lairo wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Actually, my plan is to annihilate this commi free-for-all project, Ha
>> Ha H H (now imagine thunder and lightning accompanying
>> my sinister bellowing laughter). Well meaning fools, I will destroy
Bob Davis wrote:
> I thought when I dl'ed the jre before I was using mozilla that it was
> supposed to replace the jre that navigator used. In fact I see the
> plug-ins in the navigator plug-in directory. How do I verify which jre
> version netscape is running? How did you do it?
>
> thanks
> bob
Peter Lairo wrote:
>
>
> Actually, my plan is to annihilate this commi free-for-all project, Ha
> Ha H H (now imagine thunder and lightning accompanying
> my sinister bellowing laughter). Well meaning fools, I will destroy
> you in the end.
Sounds like JTK to me
I thought when I dl'ed the jre before I was using mozilla that it was
supposed to replace the jre that navigator used. In fact I see the
plug-ins in the navigator plug-in directory. How do I verify which jre
version netscape is running? How did you do it?
thanks
bob
Pratik wrote:
> This seem
I thought when I dl'ed the jre before I was using mozilla that it was
supposed to replace the jre that navigator used. In fact I see the
plug-ins in the navigator plug-in directory. How do I verify which jre
version netscape is running? How did you do it?
thanks
bob
Pratik wrote:
> This seem
Bob Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 13 Aug 2001:
> I use the web site and have to switch browsers. So if you need
> people to complain etc, to get capitol one to support the browser
> tell me or post to this thread.
> I have also heard that you ca
(I posted some questions in this vein in netscape.devs-plugins earlier
today, but upon further examination, it looks to me like that
newsgroup is for Netscape 4.x questions, whereas I've got Netscape 6
questions. so I'm reposting here.)
I have a SmartUpdate installer which works in Netscape 4.x.
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, JTK wrote:
>
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Peter Lairo wrote:
> > >
> > > Let's use the definition of the "mail6" keyword and expand it to include
> > > all Mozilla components (not just mail). The name of the morphed keyword
> > > doesn't have to be what I
Ever since day one, Mozilla has had a problem with the cookies used on
Ultimate Bulletin Board (http://www.infopop.com) based websites. Has
anybody else noticed this? Two forums I use on a regular basis are
http://www.avsforum.com and http://www.kusat.com. When using either
site, I am unabl
Bernd Mielke wrote:
>
> Please read http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41262 and the
> whole dependency tree.
>
> Bernd
Bernd
Thanks for the pointer.
Arn
T H I S - P R O G R A M - will - m o l d
- y o u - i n t o - a -
N E T - P r i v a t e - E y e !
Locate hidden emails,
telephone numbers, or addresses.
Find
debtors
and locate hidden
assets.
Check criminal and driving
records.
Look up
someone's employment
history. and even
get your FBI
Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Peter Lairo wrote:
> >
> > Let's use the definition of the "mail6" keyword and expand it to include
> > all Mozilla components (not just mail). The name of the morphed keyword
> > doesn't have to be what I suggested, it could be something else. The
> >
Peter Lairo wrote:
> So when we "import" bananas from Israel, they start out as square
> bananas and arrive as round bananas.
Yes, and when I "boot" my Windows machine, it falls off the desk and I
bruise my toe. We're not talking about international trade; we're
talking about computer softwa
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Peter Lairo wrote:
>
> Let's use the definition of the "mail6" keyword and expand it to include
> all Mozilla components (not just mail). The name of the morphed keyword
> doesn't have to be what I suggested, it could be something else. The
> description could include cautiona
Asa Dotzler wrote:
> Every other browser you have ever installed keeps the URL in a
> native field. Mozilla isn't doing anything different from any other
> browser.
A pity. I would like Mozilla to do better than other browser :-(
Jacek
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Peter Lairo wrote:
>
> It is so easy nowadays to accidentally install software (e.g., user
> ignorance, viri, piggyback software, Micro$oft) that ANY such program
> could access the URL list in Mozilla (correct me if I'm wrong) - not
> just MediaMatrix.
So let me get this rig
Can anyone help me please.
I wish to find out the correct method of installing a plugin DLL and XPT
file when an HTML page comes
up requesting a plugin. In the past and during the testing phase I have
placed the plugin DLL and XPT file directly
into the components directory, and running the regx
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jacek Piskozub wrote:
> You can avoid writing such details in addressbook (actually I think most
> people never bothers). You cannot avoid opening URLs if you want to see
> the Web pages.
Good point. But the spyware can still slurp up the profiles directory and
Jacek Piskozub wrote:
> Chris Hoess wrote:
>
>> Except that the address book, and the information in it tying together
>> email addresses, street addresses, names, and various other personal
>> data seems like it would be just as useful a thing to snatch for
>> marketing. Shall we remove the
Peter Lairo wrote:
>
> RV wrote:
> > Peter Lairo wrote:
> >
> >> OK, for all the pedantic, anal retentive people who would rather
> >> obscure the issue and ridicule those who are trying to improve the
> >> system:
> >>
> >> PPPS. Insults are the arguments of those who have no arguments. (J.J.
>
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:24:06 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>It installs fine, loads the usual splash screen and pops up a window
>saying Mozilla has generated errors... I don't even know where the log
>file is. This problem is consistent on 0.9.2 & 3.
The error file should be
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001 23:54:28 -0500, Jerry Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In my experience, 0.9.3 is the first version to handle forms well. Prior
>to this version, I was experiencing parts of forms disappearing, buttons
>overlayed over other buttons, etc.
For me, Mozilla 0.9.3 has been a com
Chris Hoess wrote:
> Except that the address book, and the information in it tying together
> email addresses, street addresses, names, and various other personal data
> seems like it would be just as useful a thing to snatch for marketing.
> Shall we remove the address book, too? It's clear
Is there a way to turn off the java plug-in temporarily so I can spoof
the user-agent string?
I tried setting the user-agent string to spoof so I could access a site
but it blew up on loading because apparently the java plug-in checks for
a compatible browser.
thanks
bob
Jason Bassford wrote:
>>Andrew, because Peter thinks his keyword is really useful I'm giving you
>>a list of bugs that Peter has determined to be low risk (they're not,
>>
>
>Peter never said that they were low risk. In fact, he has
> repeatedly said that they were only suggestions and tha
In fact if you try getting the jar file, creating a dummy html file adn
running the applet in appletviewer, you'd still get the same exception.
Not a Mozilla bug for sure.
- Pratik.
Pratik wrote:
> This seems to be a problem in the applet not Mozilla. Fact, Mozilla uses
> JDK1.3, Netscape 4.75
This seems to be a problem in the applet not Mozilla. Fact, Mozilla uses
JDK1.3, Netscape 4.75 uses an older JDK (I checked on my machine and NS
4.72 on linux uses 1.1.5). Apparently something that worked in 1.1.5 is
no longer working in 1.3. :(. Ask the webmaster to do something about it.
- Prat
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Lairo wrote:
> Greediy companies are not interested in formatting your hard drive or to
> whom you are sending jucy love leters - there is no profit in that.
> There IS, however, a large profit in having a *detailed analysis* of
> peoples browsing habbits.
I dont know if this is the correct place to report this but here it is
anyways, If there is a specific place in bugzilla to report this tell me
and I will try.
this site:
http://www.interestratecalculator.com/mortgage/mortgage.html
works in netscape and fails in mozilla.
I have mozilla .0.9.3
ne
Matthew Thomas wrote:
[snip well-spoken and intelligent suggestions]
> Make no mistake: Peter is well-meaning, and I am quite sure that his
> contributions to Mozilla will eventually outweigh the amount of other
> people's time he wastes. But at the moment, he's still on the red side
> of the le
I use the web site and have to switch browsers. So if you need people to
complain etc, to get capitol one to support the browser tell me or post
to this thread.
I have also heard that you can spoof the browser so mozilla tells the
site(capitol one) that it is ie or ns4.7 or whatever. You might
JTK wrote:
> Rabbi, word to the wise, you do not want to get involved in this
> pathology.
In this set of newsgroups, I don't want ANYONE getting involved. Old wars
between you and OffTopicMan should not spill over to here.
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadis
Please read http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41262 and the
whole dependency tree.
Bernd
Jason Bassford wrote:
>>first thing I'd recommend is getting to know some of the other Mac
>>developers on the project. Check out the netscape.public.mozilla.mac
>>newsgroup and maybe introduce yourself there. If you haven't already,
>>start downloading daily Fizzilla builds
>>
>
>...and
For the first time a complete ECMAScript is available for the PalmOS.
With this 4.40 release of "device Javascript" even large scripts can run
in very little memory (e.g. Nombas' memory-caching your program requires
less than 11K to initialize engine and all ECMA objects, less than 1K to
compile a
Al Smith wrote:
>
> This has happened in Mozilla milestones, and just today I noticed
> it in Netscape 6.1. Somehow JavaScript is turning itself on for
> Main and News. Does anyone know why this is happening?
>
> When I download a new milestone or nightly of Mozilla, everything
> is already tur
Nope, still busted- using build 2001081303.
"Peter Lairo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> JSA wrote:
> > Right-clicking is busted in the latest nightly (build 2001081208).
Also,
> > auto-completion has been broken on the trunk for about a week.
This is the same bug as http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85475
I agree it would be nice to see this added.
Cheers,
Shawn
Simon Tompson wrote:
>In the field chooser there is no option for 'addressee'. When I look at my
>sent items I can see that I sent all the emails (surprise su
jesus X wrote:
>
> D'Arcy Smith wrote:
>
> Please don't feed the trolls. Replying to their posts about Mozilla's technical
> abilitiesis one thing, but this is nowhere near on topic. This just encourages
> them. :)
Rabbi, word to the wise, you do not want to get involved in this
pathology.
--
Peter Lairo wrote:
>
> >>Maybe you're too focused on getting the list smaller at all costs, and
> >>therefore refusing to accept even a beneficial new keyword.
> >>
> >
> > Low rick and high reward bugs are highly subjective, and a new keyword to
> > further clutter things up is inviting abuse.
>
JTK/Gary Van Sickle wrote:
>
[snip]
> It turns
> out that the Braemar company he designs heart monitors for, had to
> recall a bunch of them. They were faulty, and the FDA ordered a recall.
The judge will likely order you to correct this yourself, but just for
the record, the FDA did not order
Hello,
I would like to know what routines are called by mozilla when it is
executed. I would like to trace using gdb or ddd. Is it possible? How?
Thanks
Jorge
Jason Kratz wrote:
> "Jim Sculley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>>Jason Kratz wrote:
>>
>>>"D'Arcy Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>>K_Fd7.57109$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:K_Fd7.57109$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>>
>>>
>>>
I'd say i
I have just got an e-mail that was split into 33 e-mails, each with
part of the attachment I want to extract and join. I originally thought
that makeing a mail-box, copying the messages into there and then
dragging that to Aladdin Expander would do the job. Since the mail
box is now binary I can't
RV wrote:
> Peter Lairo wrote:
>
>> OK, for all the pedantic, anal retentive people who would rather
>> obscure the issue and ridicule those who are trying to improve the
>> system:
>>
>> PPPS. Insults are the arguments of those who have no arguments. (J.J.
>> Rousseau, schw.-frz. Phil., 1712-1
Matthew Thomas wrote:
> Jason Bassford wrote:
> < massive snip >
>
> No. All this discussion is evidence of is that Peter Lairo likes adding
> keywords to bugs. This fact is well-known to anyone who gets a lot of
> bugmail involving the front end of Mozilla, since a noticable proportion
> of said
"Jim Sculley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Jason Kratz wrote:
> > "D'Arcy Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > K_Fd7.57109$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:K_Fd7.57109$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> >
> >>I'd say it is pretty clear that Sun had
> >How? Learning how to use keywords has nothing to do with what
> > keywords are in existence.
> Just like the difficulty in learning the road rules has nothing to do
> with how many rules there are. Hmmm, no. That's a bad example. Um ...
> The difficulty of learning how to write in a part
Well, you're lucky to at least have it working, for me, putting this
line in my prefs.js causes mozilla to crash on startup... :(
Michael A. Koenecke wrote:
>I was glad to read the following post, because I have a problem with a
>particular site:
>
>[begin quote]
>Subject: Re: compatibility
>F
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Peter Lairo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>It is so easy nowadays to accidentally install software (e.g., user
>>ignorance, viri, piggyback software, Micro$oft) that ANY such program
>>could access the URL list in Mozilla (correct me if I'm wrong) - not
>>
>
> If yo
JSA wrote:
> Right-clicking is busted in the latest nightly (build 2001081208). Also,
> auto-completion has been broken on the trunk for about a week. Has anyone
> else noticed?
Not on winNT, 2008-08-12
--
Regards,
Peter Lairo
In the field chooser there is no option for 'addressee'. When I look at my
sent items I can see that I sent all the emails (surprise surprise) but I
can't see who I sent them to which can be very useful.
Any chance this could be added in?
Simon
JSA wrote:
>
> Right-clicking is busted in the latest nightly (build 2001081208). Also,
> auto-completion has been broken on the trunk for about a week. Has anyone
> else noticed?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990
Clarence
> For example, until ten years or so ago, most of New Zealand had only
> three TV channels. This allowed the user interface for choosing a
> channel to be really simple -- my family's TV set, for example, has four
> buttons, labelled `1' through `4'. Now, however, when many of us have
Doh! I j
Right-clicking is busted in the latest nightly (build 2001081208). Also,
auto-completion has been broken on the trunk for about a week. Has anyone
else noticed?
> Andrew, because Peter thinks his keyword is really useful I'm giving you
> a list of bugs that Peter has determined to be low risk (they're not,
Peter never said that they were low risk. In fact, he has
repeatedly said that they were only suggestions and that, since he's
not a programmer
Peter Lairo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is so easy nowadays to accidentally install software (e.g., user
> ignorance, viri, piggyback software, Micro$oft) that ANY such program
> could access the URL list in Mozilla (correct me if I'm wrong) - not
If you're going to worry about "accidental
> How about this http://www.mozilla.org/get-involved.html (from the front
> page of www.mozilla.org) If after reading that, a new and interested
Yes, I know about this.
Why is there no link to this off of the main Bugzilla page?
What is so hard about putting a link to that query of y
> first thing I'd recommend is getting to know some of the other Mac
> developers on the project. Check out the netscape.public.mozilla.mac
> newsgroup and maybe introduce yourself there. If you haven't already,
> start downloading daily Fizzilla builds
...and more instructions.
That's
> Andrew, after you read my response to your "I know C++ (did some OS
> hacking..." post please let me know if it or Peter's list was more
> helpful in getting started. I'm curious what an real-world hopeful
> contributor gets from the two approaches. Thanks.
That's just being childish and
Peter Lairo wrote:
>>
> OK, for all the pedantic, anal retentive people who would rather
> obscure the issue and ridicule those who are trying to improve the
> system:
>
> PPPS. Insults are the arguments of those who have no arguments. (J.J.
> Rousseau, schw.-frz. Phil., 1712-1778)
OMG, afte
Ah, now it all makes sense.
The unknown error alert is a known bug that I think Seth Spitzer is
working on. I don't know if this exact case (using the Subscribe
window) is known.
Does anyone have a bug# handy?
Seref Arikan wrote:
> hi,
> it begins to get the list, and the progress bar indica
Asa Dotzler wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> It installs fine, loads the usual splash screen and pops up a window
>> saying Mozilla has generated errors... I don't even know where the log
>> file is. This problem is consistent on 0.9.2 & 3.
>>
>
> try running mozilla.exe -profilemanager. I
hi,
it begins to get the list, and the progress bar indicates, say 130 kbs
reveived in 2 mins, but after some time, unkown error #somecode# is given
with a message box, and i am left with a bunch of groups, which is a very
low percentage of all.
i've tried oe again under vmware, and it took all t
Jason Kratz wrote:
> "D'Arcy Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> K_Fd7.57109$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:K_Fd7.57109$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
>>I'd say it is pretty clear that Sun had nothing to worry about JDKs
>>"criticalness" of Java. Anyone whith a bit of sense would know that
>>JTK h
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Lairo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>We should seriously consider the following question:
>What benefit do we have from providing this information - at this
>potential cost?
>
Another question: "how hard is it to get the URL from Mozilla's own
widget?"
Assumin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, Peter Lairo wrote:
>
PPS. What is important is that the *SPYWARE-ENABLING CODE* should be
removed from Mozilla.
See bug: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71270
>>>That's what's known as "scare mungering". For your informat
Peter Lairo wrote:
> Let's use the definition of the "mail6" keyword and expand it to include
> all Mozilla components (not just mail).
As far as I know, none of the mailX keywords are actually used by anyone
any longer, except for "mailtrack". Given that these keywords are
available, but not
Asa Dotzler wrote:
> Andrew MacDonald wrote:
>>
>> I'll check out IRC when I get a chance - never really learned to use
>> that before (dunno how hard it is or even any good OSX IRC clients?).
>> I'm more interested in working on the backend stuff, but the learning
>> curve looks very steep, an
Asa Dotzler wrote:
> Al Smith wrote:
>
>> This has happened in Mozilla milestones, and just today I noticed it
>> in Netscape 6.1. Somehow JavaScript is turning itself on for Main and
>> News. Does anyone know why this is happening?
>>
>> When I download a new milestone or nightly of Mozilla, e
Seref Arikan wrote:
> hi, i have the latest rpm relase for redhat, and mozilla just can't get the
> list of available groups from my usenet server. i am using outlook express
> under vmware now, and oe, does not have any problem getting the list, so
> it's not a connection issue .i don't want to u
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Peter Lairo wrote:
>
>>I would propose, however, that you "morph" the mail6 keyword into a
>>*LoRiskHiReward* or *easy2fix* keyword that applies to all Mozilla
>>components.
>>
>
>We could at least spell them right.
>
>Repeat after me:
>
> "Low risk
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Peter Lairo wrote:
>
> I would propose, however, that you "morph" the mail6 keyword into a
> *LoRiskHiReward* or *easy2fix* keyword that applies to all Mozilla
> components.
We could at least spell them right.
Repeat after me:
"Low risk high reward"
"Easy to fix"
Oh, by
hi John,
i am using 9.3.0 ...
"John L Merrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Seref Arikan wrote:
> > hi, i have the latest rpm relase for redhat, and mozilla just can't get
the
> > list of available groups from my usenet server. i am using out
77 matches
Mail list logo
