On 12:56 10 Apr 2002, David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| * On 2002.04.10, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
| * "Andre Bonhote" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > I recently received a mail with about 20 attached files. The sender
| > didn't want to tar it, so I got them attached one by one.
| > Yo
Hi,
I just started another attempt to get mutt 1.5 working at one of my
accounts. Without any sucess so far. Hopefully someone can help.
The situation so far is that sending mail doesn't work because mutt does
not show up again after returning from the editor (saving works). I try
to summarize w
On Apr 08, fEd Franks [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> The FAQ found at the website URL:
>
> http://www/fefe/de/muttfaq/faq.html
>
> has a broken link... Under "How can I report bugs?", the link "check
> Sven's giantlist of known bugs" gets me an HTML error:
>
> Forbidden
> ...
> I would like to k
Hi,
* David T-G [04/10/02 19:37:40 CEST] wrote:
> ...and then Andre Berger said...
> % I would like to define a keystroke that fetches gpg keys for me from
> % signed messages, like
> %
> % "gpg --keyserver www.keyserver.net --recv-keys 0x$KEY"
> %
> % But how can I get/define $KEY?
> Why rein
Hi,
* Andre Berger [04/10/02 20:14:51 CEST] wrote:
> I would like to define a keystroke that fetches gpg keys for me from
> signed messages, like
> "gpg --keyserver www.keyserver.net --recv-keys 0x$KEY"
> But how can I get/define $KEY?
It depends on what your goal is. If you want gpg to automa
On Wednesday, 10 April 2002, David T-G wrote:
> % I would like to define a keystroke that fetches gpg keys for me from
> % signed messages, like
> %
> % "gpg --keyserver www.keyserver.net --recv-keys 0x$KEY"
> %
> % But how can I get/define $KEY?
>
> Why reinvent the wheel? Just use $pgp_getke
* Rafael C. Gawenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-10 15:07]:
> Quoting darren chamberlain (Wed Apr 10 14:55:03 CEST 2002)
> > Are permissions correct on $MAIL?
>
> r-x 11 ais ais 1024 Apr 10 10:36 mail
I'm not sure what this is indicating; try
/bin/ls -l $MAIL
> It's weird! I'll
Rafael --
...and then Rafael C. Gawenda said...
%
% Quoting David T-G (Tue Apr 9 13:05:39 CEST 2002)
%
% > If you *really* want to send a message to mutt-users and have it happily
...
% > to put the temp file back in place as the real file. [BTW, I bet that
% > even though your message to mut
Rafael --
BTW, isn't your clock a bit off? Your message said 10:42 +0200 but it
certainly doesn't look like that when I peek outside...
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work
Rafael --
...and then Rafael C. Gawenda said...
%
% Hi there.
Hello!
%
% Don't know if it's my config, or some broken patch, I suppose it's the first
% option, but when I enter my spool (by just nachine$ mutt), read a
% message, and quit, the mailbox doesn't get updated, ie, If I reenter, th
Quoting darren chamberlain (Wed Apr 10 14:55:03 CEST 2002)
> Is the spool directory mounted via NFS?
No
> Are permissions correct on $MAIL?
r-x 11 ais ais 1024 Apr 10 10:36 mail
> Is /var some kind of strange partition type?
No, it's on the / fs
> Are you (accidentally) open
At 4:25 AM EDT on April 10 Rafael C. Gawenda sent off:
> Don't know if it's my config, or some broken patch, I suppose it's the first
> option, but when I enter my spool (by just nachine$ mutt), read a
> message, and quit, the mailbox doesn't get updated, ie, If I reenter, the
> msg is still ther
* Rafael C. Gawenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-10 14:50]:
> Don't know if it's my config, or some broken patch, I suppose it's the
> first option, but when I enter my spool (by just nachine$ mutt),
> read a message, and quit, the mailbox doesn't get updated, ie, If I
> reenter, the msg is still
Hi there.
Don't know if it's my config, or some broken patch, I suppose it's the first
option, but when I enter my spool (by just nachine$ mutt), read a
message, and quit, the mailbox doesn't get updated, ie, If I reenter, the
msg is still there (instead of being moved to +mbox), and marked as Ne
I think I have it working. My .lbdbrc file wasn't formatted properly.
Thanks,
-R
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:51:52AM +0100, Dave Pearson wrote:
> * Robert Conde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-10 00:10:06 -0400]:
>
> > Is there a site that explains how to use this tool in depth. I'd
> > especial
* On 2002.04.10, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "David Champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No, but tagging all 20 messages, pressing
> (probably ";s"), and pressing enter 20 times should be less painless.
s/nless/nful/
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago
* On 2002.04.10, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Andre Bonhote" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there, mutt users!
>
> I recently received a mail with about 20 attached files. The sender
> didn't want to tar it, so I got them attached one by one.
>
> You can imagine that saving was quite annoyi
begin Andre Bonhote quotation:
>
> I recently received a mail with about 20 attached files. The sender
> didn't want to tar it, so I got them attached one by one.
IMHO, bounce it, and say "give me a break, dude, use tar."
--
Shawn McMahon| Information may want to be free,
Andre --
...and then Andre Berger said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% I would like to define a keystroke that fetches gpg keys for me from
% signed messages, like
%
% "gpg --keyserver www.keyserver.net --recv-keys 0x$KEY"
%
% But how can I get/define $KEY?
Why reinvent the wheel? Just use $pgp_ge
--liOOAslEiF7prFVr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
I would like to define a keystroke that fetches gpg keys for me from
signed messages, like
"gpg --keyserver www.keyserver.net --recv-keys 0x$KEY"
But how can I get/define $KEY?
-Andre
--liOOAslE
Quoting David T-G (Tue Apr 9 13:05:39 CEST 2002)
> If you *really* want to send a message to mutt-users and have it happily
> appear in your compressed folder, have your fcc-save-hook write to '^'
> after applying Byrial's current_shortcut patch; the message will end up
> in the temp file, and u
set folder=imap://host.foo.com/folder_root
Substitute the host and the folder_root with your information and you'll
browse your imap server by default.
Dean
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:21:45PM +0200, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek wrote:
> I think it would be a good idea if c gave me folder tree of
* On 2002.04.10, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it would be a good idea if c gave me folder tree of my current
> account and not local folders. ie if I am viewing somebody@somewhere/INBOX
> c should give me imap://somebody@somewher
»Luke Ross« sagte am 2002-04-08 um 18:57:44 +0100 :
> As regards FQDN, if you'll pay for it! It's currently a dodgy NAT'd
Why pay? Get a dyndns account and there you've got your FQDN.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage:
Michal --
...and then Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek said...
%
% I think it would be a good idea if c gave me folder tree of my current
% account and not local folders. ie if I am viewing somebody@somewhere/INBOX
% c should give me imap://somebody@somewhere/, not ~/Mail (or whatever).
% The annoying
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:21:45PM +0200, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek wrote:
> I think it would be a good idea if c gave me folder tree of my current
> account and not local folders. ie if I am viewing somebody@somewhere/INBOX
> c should give me imap://somebody@somewhere/, not ~/Mail (or whatever).
* On 2002.04.10, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Hanspeter Roth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> how can one make Mutt not to verify the Pgp-signature automatically?
> I want to do it manually if at all.
Putt into your muttrc file:
set pgp_verify_sig=no
macro index \Cv "
I think it would be a good idea if c gave me folder tree of my current
account and not local folders. ie if I am viewing somebody@somewhere/INBOX
c should give me imap://somebody@somewhere/, not ~/Mail (or whatever).
The annoying behavior is observed in mutt-1.3.27i-4mdk.
Or is there a simple way
Hi there, mutt users!
I recently received a mail with about 20 attached files. The sender
didn't want to tar it, so I got them attached one by one.
You can imagine that saving was quite annoying.
Is there a way to save all at once?
[andre@coffee andre]$ mutt -v
Mutt 1.3.28i (2002-03-13)
Copyri
On Apr 10 at 16:52, Hanspeter Roth spoke:
> Hello,
>
> how can one make Mutt not to verify the Pgp-signature automatically?
> I want to do it manually if at all.
pgp_verify_sig
Hello,
how can one make Mutt not to verify the Pgp-signature automatically?
I want to do it manually if at all.
-Hanspeter
Dear all,
I am having trouble configuring "mailcap" to do anything
at all. I am configuring Mutt 1.2.5i on Cygwin (see mutt -v
output below), and it seems to run normally in other respects
-- at any rate, I can read, send, and receive messages.
When I run:
mutt -F c:/cygwin/unixmail/use
Michael --
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
% > ...and then Michael Tatge said...
...
% >
% > % Only I cannot turn it off, which sucks.
% >
% > What's to turn off?
%
% Right, you're talking about seraching not coloring, which I missed the
Ah. Rig
Outlook can save emails to IMAP server. What I did was create an IMAP account
under outlook, select all, copy to a folder under IMAP. I do not know if
procmail will be activated if you copy them to your IMAP/inbox.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:41:25PM -0400, John P Verel wrote:
> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2
Hi all.
I'm trying to compile mutt-1.3.28i, but the process failed with the
following error:
--- 8< ---
pgp.c: In function `disable_coredumps':
pgp.c:70: variable `rl' has initializer but incomplete type
pgp.c:70: warning: excess elements i
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> ...and then Michael Tatge said...
> % >
> % > What about a different approach: just search for [0-9\-/\.]*
^^
> % ([0-9]+[\.:/-]*)* would do for most numbers, phones, dates and times.
>
> % Only I cannot tu
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:06:02PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> > ...and then Michael Tatge said...
> > % macro pager "color body [0-9]"
> > %
> >
> > What about a different approach: just search for [0-9\-/\.]*
>
> No. This would color each and every
Michael --
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
% > ...and then Michael Tatge said...
% > % macro pager "color body [0-9]"
% > %
% >
% > What about a different approach: just search for [0-9\-/\.]*
%
% No. This would color each and every -, / and ".",
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> ...and then Michael Tatge said...
> % macro pager "color body [0-9]"
> %
>
> What about a different approach: just search for [0-9\-/\.]*
No. This would color each and every -, / and ".", too. But
([0-9]+[\.:/-]*)* would do for most numbers, phones, da
Michael --
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% Hi all,
Hello!
%
% I just played around with my color setup. I found that it's sometimes
% usefull to hightlight numbers in the body of a message to find a phone
Sure; that makes sense.
% number and the like. Now, I want to do that only on
Hi all,
I just played around with my color setup. I found that it's sometimes
usefull to hightlight numbers in the body of a message to find a phone
number and the like. Now, I want to do that only on demand.
macro pager "color body [0-9]"
So far so good. Currently it is impossible to remove t
Christoph --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% Hello again,
Hi!
%
% I tried out nearly any combination of fetchmail, exim, procmail and
% getmail. And the result is: It's procmail. I don't know why, but NOT
Interesting. I think you might actually mean ...
% using procmail doesn't
Carl --
...and then Carl Stehman said...
%
% Does Mutt have a command line option to send an e-mail
% message directly from the command line like
% "cat message |mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]" does for sendmail on
% standard Unix? without any interactive action needed?
You mean like "cat message | mu
Yes. mutt does the same thing. I believe that mutt even has an extra command
line option or two. read:
man mutt
man mail
Joel
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:33:02PM -0400, Carl Stehman wrote:
> Does Mutt have a command line option to send an e-mail
> message directly from the command line like
> "c
Does Mutt have a command line option to send an e-mail
message directly from the command line like
"cat message |mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]" does for sendmail on
standard Unix? without any interactive action needed?
Thanks
Carl Stehman
Hello again,
I tried out nearly any combination of fetchmail, exim, procmail and
getmail. And the result is: It's procmail. I don't know why, but NOT
using procmail doesn't insert the Status tags in the header.
I just could't figure out, what the problem is. When I use an empty
procmailrc , every
* Robert Conde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-10 00:10:06 -0400]:
> Is there a site that explains how to use this tool in depth. I'd
> especially like it to grab addresses from my Palm Pilot. I tried
> http://www.spinnaker.de/lbdb, but I didn't find it very helpful.
[I'm the author of the palm mod
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
> % * Michael Tatge [04/09/02 15:42:25 CEST] wrote:
> % > Who needs urlview?
> %
> % I like using it because I hate copy'n'paste. I also don't like to idea
> % to use a mouse as frequently as urlview. ;-)
>
> Perhaps he sh
48 matches
Mail list logo
