In it will not hurt performance when constantly asking for config
parameter with locking i am fine with it. Can be also compile time
option for configure
Vasiljevic Zoran wrote:
So:
The configuration is global and read-only. Parameters may be
retrieved at
run-time using [cmd
of the var arg list
-gustaf neumann
PS: fixed a similar issue in xotcl more than a year ago.
Vlad Seryakov schrieb:
Hi,
This is an example when it crashes inside vsnprintf, experimenting i
found that issuing long unknown command crashes as well. In my case i
noticed that trying
i personally never used ns_conn but use writers all the time.
Stephen Deasey wrote:
Here's some problems with ns_conn channel:
- ssl: if you use it (or any other comm module) you'll be surprised
when 'puts' gets written in clear text.
- If you 'puts' rather than ns_write, you may be
By implementing it in C and using Tcl_Eval ascripts will be executed at
global level and all variables will be visible.
It is just may result in supporting 2 diferent config styles which may
add maintanence and confusion but overall i personally like new style better
Jeff Rogers wrote:
Vlad
On Linux we are using pam_smb and it works great, i compiled it in
non-daemon mode and Naviserver has ns_pam module.
Rick Cobb wrote:
We’re getting a lot of requests for real Windows “single-sign-on”. That
is, no sign on at all if the user’s already logged into their Windows
domain. This
I think it is time to share our great achievements on Naviserver with
the world:-))
i mean to release it
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 29.06.2007, at 11:39, Bernd Eidenschink wrote:
if foo+bar is already encoded, it's ok that another ns_urlencode -
part path
doesn't add anything more, and
What are you suggesting? i am not defending what is currently
implemented but my only concern is backward compatibility, i have too
many applications running on naviserver and many companies depend on it:-))
Stephen Deasey wrote:
On 6/29/07, Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That may
i am running latest from CVS on Linux, no delays, IE7 works fine
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
Hi again!
Seems quite a few of things were chaged in
some last weeks...
I observe (on all browsers) that after firing up
the server for the first time, the very first
(home)page takes about 2-3
Excellent work Stephen!!
Stephen Deasey wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/naviserver/naviserver
In directory sc8-pr-cvs16.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv25435
Modified Files:
ChangeLog
Log Message:
* nsd/connio.c:
* tests/encoding.test: Use a more robust check for buffer full
The reason to use Ns_ConnUpdateHeaders which replaces the header, before
it just added
Stephen Deasey wrote:
On 2/19/07, Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RCS file: /cvsroot/naviserver/naviserver/nsd/return.c,v
retrieving revision 1.29
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -C2 -d -r1.29 -r1.30
,
means developer sold on Naviserver, will secure it if need nscp there.
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
But when we check for inet_ntop there is no u_int8_t or other type
references, just inet_ntop(0, (char *)0, (char *)0, 0);
Can you check config.log for inet_ntop checking
Michael A. Cleverly wrote:
On 2/6/07, Stephen Deasey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/6/07, Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED
I updated configure.in in the CVS, can you run autogen.sh on CVS version
and see if it will detect it right.
Michael A. Cleverly wrote:
On 2/7/07, Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But when we check for inet_ntop there is no u_int8_t or other type
references, just inet_ntop(0, (char *)0
://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
{
unsigned long l;
unsigned char b[4];
} u;
u.l = (unsigned long) addr.s_addr;
sprintf(tlsPtr-nabuf, %u.%u.%u.%u, u.b[0], u.b[1], u.b[2], u.b[3]);
#endif
return tlsPtr-nabuf;
}
Michael A. Cleverly wrote:
On 2/6/07, Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try to compile
Try this one:
#include ns.h
main()
{
unsigned char b[4];
struct in_addr addr;
addr.s_addr = inet_addr(127.0.0.1);
memcpy(b, addr.s_addr, 4);
printf(%u.%u.%u.%u\n, b[0], b[1], b[2], b[3]);
}
Stephen Deasey wrote:
On 2/6/07, Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Linux
;
}
drvPtr = drvPtr-nextPtr;
}
}
}
Ns_Log(Notice, exiting);
Ns_MutexLock(drvLock);
drvStopped = 1;
Ns_CondBroadcast(drvCond);
Ns_MutexUnlock(drvLock);
}
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
and runs. No spreading
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 23.01.2007 um 17:14 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
and lighttpd also uses sendfile which is faster than user-spave
read-send operation fastpath uses
There you go. They do it all in kernel. I guess this can't be beat.
Anyways, it is good to know where we stand.
I think this may only
cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
I have located the culprit! It does not have anything
to do with our code, rather with Tcl. It seems that
stdin/stdout/stderr channels are not properly handled
on thread exit (not detached from the interp).
This is a can of worms that I'm now opening...
I hate to fiddle with that stuff in Tcl
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
Try to uncomment -DUSE_MALLOC in Makefile, looks like Solaris/OSX do not
like too many mmap-ed pages
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 20.12.2006, at 15:33, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
In my test.tcl when hitting nsd 5000 times i get 720 req/sec with
zippy,
640 req/sec with vmalloc and 520 req/sec
directly and its functions will be used instead of
later-linked Tcl ones.
Still, good to know how it works on different OSes, Thanks
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 22.12.2006, at 15:59, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
Try malloctest, tclalloctest is not real test, it just calls
TclThreadAllocObj to see how
5.4 241844 56548 ?Ssl 00:19 0:02
/usr/local/ns/bin/nsd -i -u
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 20.12.2006, at 01:04, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
I put together another thing to test, it runs fine with my Naviserver
and worked well with my old Tcl/Adp tests. Speed is less than zippy
Yes, please
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 19.12.2006, at 15:57, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
Zoran, can you test it on Solaris and OSX so we'd know that is not
Linux
related problem.
I have a Tcl library compiled with nedmalloc and when I link
against it and make
#define MemAlloc Tcl_Alloc
#define
gdb may slow down concurrency, does it run without gdb, also does it run
with solaris malloc?
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 19.12.2006, at 16:06, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
Yes, please
( I appended the code to the nedmalloc test program
and renamed their main to main1)
bash-2.03$ gcc -O3 -o
|PROT_EXEC,
MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE, 0, 0); }
void mfree(void *ptr, size_t size) { munmap(ptr, size); }
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 19.12.2006, at 16:15, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
gdb may slow down concurrency, does it run without gdb, also does
it run
with solaris malloc?
No problems. Runs
, some times it doesn't. Clearly it's timing
related. The root cause is not going to be identified by injecting a
whole bunch of random!
Make this program shorter.
On 12/19/06, Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried nedmalloc with LD_PRELOAD for my little test and it crashed vene
before
I converted all to use pthreads directly instead of Tcl wrappers, and
now it does not crash anymore. Will continue testing but it looks like
Tcl is the problem here, not ptmalloc
Stephen Deasey wrote:
On 12/19/06, Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, it crashes when number of threads
I have no idea, i spent too much time on this still without realizing
what i am doing and what to expect :-)))
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 19.12.2006, at 17:08, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
I converted all to use pthreads directly instead of Tcl wrappers, and
now it does not crash anymore
Right, with Ns_ functions it does not crash.
Stephen Deasey wrote:
On 12/19/06, Zoran Vasiljevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19.12.2006, at 17:08, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
I converted all to use pthreads directly instead of Tcl wrappers, and
now it does not crash anymore. Will continue testing
into shared queue which other threads can re-use.
But shared cache never gets returned so conn threads exit will not help
with memory bloat.
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
Still, even without the last free and with mutex around it, it core
dumps in free(gPtr) during the loop.
Stephen Deasey wrote:
On 12/18/06, Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to run this program, it crahses with all allocators on free when
it was allocated in other thread. zippy
= 0; i nthreads; ++i) {
Tcl_JoinThread(tids[i], NULL);
}
}
Stephen Deasey wrote:
On 12/18/06, Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still, even without the last free and with mutex around it, it core
dumps in free(gPtr) during the loop.
OK. Still doesn't mean your program
Instead of using threadspeed or other simple malloc/free test, i used
naviserver and Tcl pages as test for allocators.
Using ab from apache and stresstest it for thousand requests i test
several allocators. And
having everything the same except LD_PRELOAD the difference seems pretty
clear.
You can, it moves Tcl_Objs struct between thread and shared pools, same
goes with other memory blocks.On thread exit
all memory goes to shared pool.
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 16.12.2006, at 17:15, Stephen Deasey wrote:
Yeah, pretty sure. You can only use Tcl objects within a single
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL
Yes, i did that, there are only few places where #ifdef is used, inside
these functions and inside ReturnRange
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 14.12.2006, at 04:26, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
I just replaced Tcl_FSStat in fastpath.c with stat and got about 5-9%
increase in serving 26K image file. I am
brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
in serving 26K image file. I am making #define which will make
this compile time configurable, anyway i am in this already.
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608
at least 5-10 times, on the same machine. I
have no swapping, plenty of available memory.
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 12.12.2006, at 16:03, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
This runs at rate around 6000 req/sec, blows away Tcl .files and PHP,
same speed as Apache static files
You mean, the test.adp with pre
, 2006 at 10:03:09AM -0500, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
Von:Gustaf Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what happens, if you try byte-compiled code, e.g.:
This runs at rate around 6000 req/sec, blows away Tcl .files and PHP,
same speed as Apache static files
Interesting! And so that suggests that a newer
Not sure what is the problem?
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 12.12.2006, at 16:18, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
Yes, i called it test2.adp. It runs as fast as apache serves static
files, ok, i just reran tests, it runs FASTER than apache serves
test.html file. i used
Well, what IS the problem
Right, i got lost in the logic :-)))
.tcl files needs to be improved but overall i am back on track with my
old belief that NS is faster than apache/PHP :-)))
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 12.12.2006, at 16:27, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
Not sure what is the problem?
:-))
You said: NS/ADP slower
-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
as well.
Stephen Deasey wrote:
On 12/11/06, Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I actually even tried to test PHP inside Naviserver, same file, it was
much slower than under Apache and .adp. I specifically chose simple
examples and no DB, i wanted to see how simple web pages are served
it.
bufsize is how many bytes to read, both seems pretty clear but why that
situation occurs i still have no idea.
Stephen Deasey wrote:
On 12/12/06, Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When i started this i did not want to be the fastest, i wanted to see
where we stand, even if it would turn out
will never be
fully filled? What kind of sense does that make.
Reading nsd/driver.c, it's really not obvious what's going on.
I will see into that, readahead could be unnesassary
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
I am sorry, i have no idea how i got 6000 req/sec, i am trying to
reproduce it and i cannot, all i got is around 1200 req/sec
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 12.12.2006, at 16:27, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
Not sure what is the problem?
:-))
You said: NS/ADP slower than Apache/PHP
You tested
More salt on a wound:-)))
Just compiled Tcl8.5, same test runs 40% slower than on 8.4. Still
cannot get over 1200 req/sec, but with 8.5 cannot get higher than 700
req/sec
I am done for today
Vlad Seryakov wrote:
I am sorry, i have no idea how i got 6000 req/sec, i am trying to
reproduce
://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED
I tested AS 4.5, it is even slower than NS, not much but a little bit
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 11.12.2006, at 06:17, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
The results are somewhat bad, Naviserver is 2x slower on simple adp
page
comparing to similar PHP page.
Not that the channel stuff I added some time
:
On 11.12.2006, at 16:27, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
I tested AS 4.5, it is even slower than NS, not much but a little bit
Well, then it is not the Tcl channel stuff as 4.5 still uses
open/read. In that case it must be something else. I guess you
need to put shortcircuit code at various places to isolate
are served. I
always though that Apache/PHP is slower than Aolserver/Naviserver, looks
like it is already history.
Stephen Deasey wrote:
On 12/11/06, Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can sqeeze something from C maybe, but Tcl is a bottleneck, making
for loop bigger than over 200-500
yes, it is slower than from .adp page
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 11.12.2006, at 23:21, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
Getting to C language every time i need to do stuff is not an option
Did yu try ns_return as Stephen suggested
benchmarked NS before, but now i am surprised. I know Tcl is slow but
that is at least 2 times. By making list bigger as 500 iterations, PHP
works still faster than Tcl does 50 iterations.
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
ns_unregister_url2file.man
ns_var.man
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
be extended?
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
Found %llu and it does not complain
Vlad Seryakov wrote:
Hi,
Stephen, do you know how to avoid ugly warnings like unknown format when
i want to use %q in Ns_DStringPrintf to output Tcl_WideInt type.
Converting to double is ugly as well, i just put them for now to make it
work but this needs
) at pthread.c:752
#44 0xb7c3627b in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#45 0xb7d0208e in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
Now it is panicing all the time and i am using Tcl time calls only
Vlad Seryakov wrote:
[Switching to thread 5 (Thread -1471153248 (LWP 22074))]#0 0xb7f21410
in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7f21410 in ?? ()
#1 0xa84fd3c8 in ?? ()
#2 0xb7d60ff4 in ?? () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3 0xa84fd3b4
I see additional checks about Tcl time object being shared and those are
trigger panics now.
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 15.11.2006, at 18:27, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
Now it is panicing all the time and i am using Tcl time calls only
This is most probably introduced in last 2-3 weeks as I
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
naviserver-commits mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-commits
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
Also, for test sake, can you change driver.c:2777
from if (n curPtr-bufsize) {
to if (n 0) {
and see if it will work, Ns_SockSend may send less bytes which is not an
error condition
Vlad Seryakov wrote:
in my config it works fine with bufsize 8192. This parameter tells the
writer size
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
Stephen,
i checked your patch for AS 4.1 regarding acceptmax, we can adopt it
for our driver as well
No, nothing bad. I think it's a great idea!
But some of the newer APIs for this are weird because they handle more
than socket IO, and we are worried about portability, right? I'm just
What remains:
naming of the module
API (handle vs. handle-free)
ns_exec or ns_slave
i would keep both API, so i would decide in each particular case when
to use which, i do not think they are mutual exclusive
=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571
-referenced. Everything is in our power.
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
will be available
Also, when do you plan to release 5.0?
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 27.09.2006, at 16:47, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
It would be good to have documentation ready for the 5.0 release, at
least all commands needs to be somewhat documented.
Correct. As all (most) is now in CVS
cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
I remember i've done it with my OCaml module, it registers handlers for
.cmo files and handles them in C, not via Tcl. I had to provide API to
ns_conn and other stuff of course but it is not that complicated as it
looks.
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 27.09.2006, at 17:31, Vlad Seryakov wrote
.
That means, those modules should be easily installed and/or referred
from docs or main page somehow so it is easy to install them and see.
Is it something worth trying?
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 27.09.2006, at 17:00, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
Also, when do you plan to release 5.0?
A Christmas present
-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
Here it is the doctools generated html files from source manpages.
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/nsdocs/toc.html
doctool does all auto-referencing, so to make it pretty we just need CSS
style.
make build-doc
calls dtplite and produces this under doc/html
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608
Zoran, Stephen,
What do you think about migrating to SVN?
Vlad Seryakov wrote:
I converted and loaded current CVS HEAD into naviserver SVN repository,
CVS is still primary but we can play with SVN and decide to switch or
keep CVS. Personally, i switched to SVN more than a year ago in all my
, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
What do you think about migrating to SVN?
What (mew) do I have to learn? How is this going
to benefit me or the project?
Not that I'm lazy to learn new things. I just have
very little time, if this is not something that
considerably adds value
It is already available, i imported all branches and tags into SVN, go
to SF and try browse Subversion. Once everybody agree, i will re-import
most recent CVS version.
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 20.09.2006, at 17:17, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
Yes, subversion is open-source and available for all
We need trunk/ only, i guess thos eold tags and branches are CVs
artifacts:-))0
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 20.09.2006, at 17:30, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
It is already available, i imported all branches and tags into SVN, go
to SF and try browse Subversion. Once everybody agree, i will re
/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
Because this has never been exposed to Tcl before, and because seems
to be (to me) a genuine bug which could bight us as we add more HTTP
1.1 support, it seems like now would be the time to take a step back
and look at what we really want in this API.
It's only one call to register, one to
101 - 200 of 420 matches
Mail list logo
