On Wednesday 27 October 2004 00:26, Aron Smith wrote:
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 01:14 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 21:40, Rob Blomquist wrote:
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 12:13 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
H.J. - Now I dared to connect my camera, but with the usual
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:13, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
Even in runlevel 3 i can see the process going on
(in /var/log/messages). The system connects/disconnects its USB
device until hell freezes over or I reboot.
As a last resort I re-installed 10.1 CE from scratch, copied nothing
back from my
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 10:18, John Layt wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:13, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
Even in runlevel 3 i can see the process going on
(in /var/log/messages). The system connects/disconnects its
USB device until hell freezes over or I reboot.
As a last resort I
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 10:18, John Layt wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:13, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
Even in runlevel 3 i can see the process going on
(in /var/log/messages). The system connects/disconnects its
USB device until hell freezes over or I reboot.
As a last resort I
Miark wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:09:07 -0500, Tom wrote:
Yes, but in newer Mandrake versions the CD drives are seen
as dev=ATA:0,0,0 I use 0,0,0 for example only,
'cdrecord dev=ATA -scanbus' will return the actual numbers. The
ATA device (burner) is linked to the numbers. EG, on
Adolfo Bello wrote:
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 10:18 +0100, John Richard Smith wrote:
Then, making sure the CD you just burned isn't mounted:
in terminal,
dd if=/dev/scd0 bs=2048 count=n | md5sum -
(note the - on the end, don't leave it off.
change the /dev/scd0 to whatever device setting your
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
As a last resort I re-installed 10.1 CE from scratch, copied
nothing back from my backup CDs, updated available rpms and
tried anew. Still staring at my runaway box.
I have reached the point of considering a switch to some other
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 14:13, Stew Benedict wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
As a last resort I re-installed 10.1 CE from scratch,
copied nothing back from my backup CDs, updated available
rpms and tried anew. Still staring at my runaway box.
I have
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 11:16:40PM +0800, frankieh wrote:
Todd Slater wrote:
I am hosting a few sites for friends that need cgi access. I read
something about cgi scripts shouldn't be in the web document root for
security purposes--people being able to read them as text. I turned on
cgi by
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 14:29, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 14:13, Stew Benedict wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
As a last resort I re-installed 10.1 CE from scratch,
copied nothing back from my backup CDs, updated available
rpms and tried
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:18:17 +0100, John wrote:
ls -l iso image file
Divide the size of the ISO image file by 2048 to get the
number of sectors, and record that sum (=n, hereafter)
If it comes out to a decimal, do I round up?
Then, making sure the CD you just burned isn't mounted:
Why
On Wednesday 27 Oct 2004 13:56, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
I have the feeling this is a kernel bug. Now, I have to reboot
again :-/
After a few days' break I came back to this long thread. Out of curiosity I
plugged my FujiFilm FinePix S304 into the one box that I have upgraded to
10.1. I had
Just finished doing an
urpmi.update -a --no-md5sum urpmi -auto-select
on a clean 10.1 CE install that I've been running since the weekend.
Prior to the update my mouse worked perfectly, or at least as I wanted
it - if I held it over a window and scrolled the middle button the
window would
What is the relationship between Mozilla and Firefox, and
Mozilla-mail and Thuderbird. Are the latter going to eventually
replace the former? And if if not, why are the Mozilla folks
promoting competing products?
Miark
Want to buy your Pack
Miark wrote:
What is the relationship between Mozilla and Firefox, and
Mozilla-mail and Thuderbird. Are the latter going to eventually
replace the former? And if if not, why are the Mozilla folks
promoting competing products?
Miark
One ofthe complaints leveled against the mozilla suite, was
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 17:39, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 27 Oct 2004 13:56, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
I have the feeling this is a kernel bug. Now, I have to reboot
again :-/
After a few days' break I came back to this long thread. Out of
curiosity I plugged my FujiFilm FinePix S304
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 09:33 am, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 17:39, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 27 Oct 2004 13:56, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
I have the feeling this is a kernel bug. Now, I have to reboot
again :-/
After a few days' break I came back to this
On October 27, 2004 10:33, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
...
The box in question has 10.1OE upgraded late last week from
cooker, running 2.6.8-12 kernel (IIRC). Is there anything else
you would like me to check for correlation?
...
What went wrong with 10.1 ???
Kaj Haulrich.
Just saw this on
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:04:10 +0800, frankieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miark wrote:
What is the relationship between Mozilla and Firefox, and
Mozilla-mail and Thuderbird. Are the latter going to eventually
replace the former? And if if not, why are the Mozilla folks
promoting competing
On Wednesday 27 Oct 2004 17:33, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
Although I feel sorry for you, Anne (being unable to use your
camera) I'm somehow conforted that I'm not alone !
;-) It's not a big problem - yet! I don't need the camera on that box, but
it certainly tells me not to install on box2 as I
On Wednesday 27 Oct 2004 17:52, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
Just saw this on Linux Today: Mandrakeliux 10.1 Official Released
http://linuxtoday.com/infrastructure/2004102701526NWMDSW
Might be worth downloading and doing a clean install (you've probably seen
the oft-repeated advice that version
Miark wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:18:17 +0100, John wrote:
ls -l iso image file
Divide the size of the ISO image file by 2048 to get the
number of sectors, and record that sum (=n, hereafter)
If it comes out to a decimal, do I round up?
It doesn't.
The sectors in question are the number
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 19:29, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 27 Oct 2004 17:33, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
Although I feel sorry for you, Anne (being unable to use your
camera) I'm somehow conforted that I'm not alone !
;-) It's not a big problem - yet! I don't need the camera on
that
On October 27, 2004 11:32, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 27 Oct 2004 17:52, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
Just saw this on Linux Today: Mandrakeliux 10.1 Official Released
http://linuxtoday.com/infrastructure/2004102701526NWMDSW
Might be worth downloading and doing a clean install (you've
On Wednesday 27 Oct 2004 19:16, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
Yes, and upgrade _should_ give you exactly the same end result as a clean
install. There should be no difference other than the upgrade being faster
(due to not having to reinstall packages that are already up to date).
But history has
John Richard Smith wrote:
Miark wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:18:17 +0100, John wrote:
ls -l iso image file
Divide the size of the ISO image file by 2048 to get the
number of sectors, and record that sum (=n, hereafter)
If it comes out to a decimal, do I round up?
It doesn't.
The sectors in
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 02:00 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 27 Oct 2004 19:16, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
Yes, and upgrade _should_ give you exactly the same end
result as a clean install. There should be no difference
other than the upgrade being faster (due to not having to
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 21:51, Tom Brinkman wrote:
snip
I know reverting to 2.6.8.1-10 from -12mdk solved boot up
problems checking (Reiser) FS's after I added an SATA drive into
a mix of IDE drives a few weeks ago. With 2.6.8.1-12 the system
went crazy, but all is well with -10mdk.
Marek Pawinski wrote:
I picked this up, i don't know if it pertains to the issue:
Bad Md5sums? (maybe not)
Just burned a CD from an ISO image and the md5sum doesn't match? The
CD may be just fine... what you may be experiencing is padding which
alters the md5sum. Before throwing away the CD and
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 22:59, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
Tom, do you have any idea as to where I can fetch kernel
2.6.8.1-10 ?
I tried kernel 2.6.3, but it completely borked my ReiserFS.
Kaj Haulrich.
http://ftp.surfnet.nl/ftp/pub/os/Linux/distr/Mandrakelinux/devel/10.1/i586/media/main/
On Wednesday 27 Oct 2004 21:59, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
Tom, do you have any idea as to where I can fetch kernel
2.6.8.1-10 ?
That was on the original download 10.1CE disk
Anne
--
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 23:20, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 22:59, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
Tom, do you have any idea as to where I can fetch kernel
2.6.8.1-10 ?
I tried kernel 2.6.3, but it completely borked my ReiserFS.
Kaj Haulrich.
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 03:59 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
I know reverting to 2.6.8.1-10 from -12mdk solved boot up
problems checking (Reiser) FS's after I added an SATA drive
into a mix of IDE drives a few weeks ago. With 2.6.8.1-12 the
system went crazy, but all is well with -10mdk.
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 23:41, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 03:59 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
I know reverting to 2.6.8.1-10 from -12mdk solved boot up
problems checking (Reiser) FS's after I added an SATA drive
into a mix of IDE drives a few weeks ago. With
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 23:39, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
Therefore, I wanted to follow Tom's advice and install the
2.6.8.1-10 kernel. Can't find it anywhere, though. Even
rpmfind.net doesn't come up with it.
Maybe I should try the 2.4 kernel for 10.1 ?
Kaj Haulrich.
You could try the
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 23:41, Tom Brinkman wrote:
-10mdk is the kernel that 10.1 CE was released with. So if
you've got 10.1CE CD's you've got it. I went lookin for -10 on
the mirrors, specifically 'kernel-source' but didn't find it. In
my situation I'm still tryin to figure out why
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 23:50, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 23:39, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
Therefore, I wanted to follow Tom's advice and install the
2.6.8.1-10 kernel. Can't find it anywhere, though. Even
rpmfind.net doesn't come up with it.
Maybe I should try
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 23:56, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
Wish me luck.
Kaj Haulrich.
I'll keep my fingers crossed for you...as it sounds like a mess on your box
right nowsweaty palms et all, heh?:)
Don't uninstall/re-install too quickly though. Sounds sort of windosy to me to
be a real
On Thursday 28 October 2004 00:06, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 23:56, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
Wish me luck.
Kaj Haulrich.
I'll keep my fingers crossed for you...as it sounds like a mess
on your box right nowsweaty palms et all, heh?:)
Don't uninstall/re-install too
Hi there.
I've got this peculiar problem with the time on my system. This begun to
happen couple of days ago.
After every system reboot or restart (yeah, I turn the computer off) the
clock sets itself to something like -7 hours from my local time.
Example: Now it's 00:13 and it shows me 17:13.
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 17:16, Thereidos wrote:
Hi there.
I've got this peculiar problem with the time on my system. This begun
to happen couple of days ago.
After every system reboot or restart (yeah, I turn the computer off)
the clock sets itself to something like -7 hours from my
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:49:14 -0500
Hoyt Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 17:16, Thereidos wrote:
Hi there.
I've got this peculiar problem with the time on my system. This
begun to happen couple of days ago.
After every system reboot or restart (yeah, I turn
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 18:17, Thereidos wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:49:14 -0500
Hoyt Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 17:16, Thereidos wrote:
Hi there.
I've got this peculiar problem with the time on my system. This
begun to happen couple of days
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 07:17 pm, Thereidos wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:49:14 -0500
Hoyt Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 17:16, Thereidos wrote:
Hi there.
I've got this peculiar problem with the time on my system. This
begun to happen couple of
someone sent me this:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1682854,00.asp
Maryse
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Could anybody tell what is the easiest way to monitor the free space on my
partitions.
In Mandrake 9.1 I used kdiskfree (I think that was the right name) but I
can find it on Mandrake 10.
Thanks
Alan
--
--
Linux user 321006
--
46 matches
Mail list logo
