FemmeFatale wrote:
At 09:04 PM 2/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
snip
You must have some artistic/creative/designer-type friends, because all
of the HTML mail eye candy I get is spam. And from all the spam, most is
not eye candy but really poorly designed (I know from seeing the wife's
spam in
On Sunday 09 February 2003 01:18 am, robin wrote:
snip
I've used it on a couple of occasions in the last few years. Sometimes
I need to use non-ascii characters, and can't rely on the receiver
having the ability to decode any other way. Once I had to circulate a
document that wanted very
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:58:30 +0200, Gil Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there any HTML e-mail client like outlook express?
There are several. If you're familiar with Outlook Express you'll feel right at home
with Evolution. It does everything Outlook does except propagate viruses.
--
Warren
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 09:14:36AM +0200, Gil Katz wrote:
Ok
i didn??? express myself ouite clear enough
i got several accounts in hotmail and the easiest way to handel them is by
outlook express so that what i need.
Gil
I'm not sure I understand what you want to do. Do you want to access
Hi
is there any HTML e-mail client like outlook express?
Gil
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
In reply to Gil's mail, d.d. Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:58:30 +0200:
Hi
is there any HTML e-mail client like outlook express?
Gil
Evolution should be what you look for.
Paul
--
Some Windows were made to be broken.
http://nlpagan.net - Linux by Mandrake - Sylpheed by Hiro
Want to buy your Pack or
On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:04, Paul wrote:
In reply to Gil's mail, d.d. Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:58:30 +0200:
Hi
is there any HTML e-mail client like outlook express?
Gil
Evolution should be what you look for.
Paul
Evolution got POP or IMAP what i need is a e-mail client to connect to
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gil Katz
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] HTML e-mail client
On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:04, Paul wrote:
In reply to Gil's mail, d.d
In reply to Adolfo's mail, d.d. Sat, 8 Feb 2003 05:30:30 -0400:
Evolution got POP or IMAP what i need is a e-mail client to
connect to hotmail
Gil
What you need is another mail account :-)
*grin*
Hotmail is a Micro$osft proprietary 'protocol' as far as I know.
I have not heard about any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 08 February 2003 04:15 am, Gil Katz wrote:
On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:04, Paul wrote:
In reply to Gil's mail, d.d. Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:58:30 +0200:
Hi
is there any HTML e-mail client like outlook express?
Gil
Evolution
Pupeno wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 08 February 2003 04:15 am, Gil Katz wrote:
On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:04, Paul wrote:
In reply to Gil's mail, d.d. Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:58:30 +0200:
Hi
is there any HTML e-mail client like outlook express?
Gil
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 12:56, robin wrote:
If you use Mozilla, the Hermes addon apparently allows reading of
hotmail and some other web-based account as though they were POP3
accounts. See http://hermes.mozdev.org/index.html
Not quite.. all hermes does is add a sidebar which gives you a
Hi
is there any HTML e-mail client like outlook express?
Gil
Hi Gil,
Sure there is. Evolution is one, kmail is another. The first one is
fancier (more like complete Outlook version, but buggy, at least in the
1.0.8 version) and there is kmail which is a pure mail client, working
very
Does Kmail handle HTML??
Russ
- Original Message -
Hi
is there any HTML e-mail client like outlook express?
Gil
Hi Gil,
Sure there is. Evolution is one, kmail is another. The first one is
fancier (more like complete Outlook version, but buggy, at least in the
1.0.8
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 12:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
is there any HTML e-mail client like outlook express?
Gil
Hi Gil,
Sure there is. Evolution is one, kmail is another. The first one is
fancier (more like complete Outlook version, but buggy, at least in the
1.0.8 version) and
When sending emails to lists and for general use, yes text only is
acceptable and actually how it should be. This is NOT so for many family and
friends that are spread the world over. Being able to dress up your letters
and send pictures inline (so you can explain the photo) is a big thing and
BTW Mozilla's mail client sucks. Evolution is the way to go.
I have not used Mozilla, but I think that Evolution is bloated, the
use I would think for it would be in an office where you might
need everything but the kitchen sink
/Anders
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 11:15:18AM +0200, Gil Katz wrote:
Evolution got POP or IMAP what i need is a e-mail client to connect to hotmail
Gil
As far as I know. hotmail uses a special protocol which outlook
express and possibly the latest version of outlook can connect to... If
you are using
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 09:23:18AM -0800, Russ wrote:
When sending emails to lists and for general use, yes text only is
acceptable and actually how it should be. This is NOT so for many family and
friends that are spread the world over. Being able to dress up your letters
and send pictures
Again, I must respectfully disagree with you. Unless they can come up with
another way to dress up plain ol text between friends and family, it will
stay. Most people want eye candy and without it they will move on. Linux
does not need the various GUI's to operate, but in order to get more people
Sure there is. Evolution is one, kmail is another. The first one is
fancier (more like complete Outlook version, but buggy, at least in the
1.0.8 version) and there is kmail which is a pure mail client, working
very nicely. The only thing which GNU/linux software never managed to
achieve
You are right about the bloat but it does send and receive in HTML. I am
still looking for the slimmed down version like OutLook Ex is to OutLook.
Russ
- Original Message -
BTW Mozilla's mail client sucks. Evolution is the way to go.
I have not used Mozilla, but I think that
On Saturday 08 February 2003 12:56 pm, Russ wrote:
Again, I must respectfully disagree with you. Unless they can come up with
another way to dress up plain ol text between friends and family, it will
stay. Most people want eye candy and without it they will move on. Linux
does not need the
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 14:07, Russ wrote:
You are right about the bloat but it does send and receive in HTML. I am
still looking for the slimmed down version like OutLook Ex is to OutLook.
Russ
- Original Message -
BTW Mozilla's mail client sucks. Evolution is the way to go.
You are right about the bloat but it does send and receive in HTML. I am
still looking for the slimmed down version like OutLook Ex is to OutLook.
I have not used it myself but IIRC there is a client called Balsa that is
supposed
to be good. Perhaps somebody else has used it and can give us a
It may be bloated but I use almost any feature in it: mail, calendar,
todo (tasks), contacts and particularly helpful to me, an assistant
reminding me through my cell phone/pager of every meeting or appointment
that I may have.
Personally I prefer the traditional UNIX approach, one program
At 01:27 PM 2/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
snipper
How I deal with the security risks of html mail is with filters that
whitelist
people I trust. If I receive an html e-mail from somebody not on my trusted
list, it gets sent to a different folder that displays everything as plain
text, so it can
At 07:24 PM 2/8/2003 +0100, you wrote:
You are right about the bloat but it does send and receive in HTML. I am
still looking for the slimmed down version like OutLook Ex is to OutLook.
I have not used it myself but IIRC there is a client called Balsa that is
supposed
to be good. Perhaps
I can post a review I had of it from a very long time ago (2001 April/May
issue) in an issue of Maximum Linux (a now defunct magazine). If anyone
is
interested that is, contact me offlist or post it to the list.
Please share with us
/Anders
Want to buy your Pack or Services from
On Saturday 08 February 2003 07:42 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
At 01:27 PM 2/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
snipper
How I deal with the security risks of html mail is with filters that
whitelist
people I trust. If I receive an html e-mail from somebody not on my
trusted list, it gets sent to a
At 01:59 AM 2/9/2003 +0100, you wrote:
I can post a review I had of it from a very long time ago (2001 April/May
issue) in an issue of Maximum Linux (a now defunct magazine). If anyone
is
interested that is, contact me offlist or post it to the list.
Please share with us
/Anders
Balsa:
At 08:22 PM 2/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
On Saturday 08 February 2003 07:42 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
At 01:27 PM 2/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
snipper
How I deal with the security risks of html mail is with filters that
whitelist
people I trust. If I receive an html e-mail from somebody not on
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 05:35:43PM -0700, FemmeFatale wrote:
I'm going to risk abolishment to M$hits camp here or excommunication from
the Linux community by saying this... but what else is new?
Russ I have to agree with you luvy. Most ppl love eye candy. I know I
do. I use Evolution
On Saturday 08 February 2003 8:04 pm, Todd Slater wrote:
*snip*
You must have some artistic/creative/designer-type friends, because all
of the HTML mail eye candy I get is spam. And from all the spam, most is
not eye candy but really poorly designed (I know from seeing the wife's
spam in
At 09:04 PM 2/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
snip
You must have some artistic/creative/designer-type friends, because all
of the HTML mail eye candy I get is spam. And from all the spam, most is
not eye candy but really poorly designed (I know from seeing the wife's
spam in Mozilla).
But I do get
On Saturday 08 February 2003 09:12 pm, Chuck Burns wrote:
You forgot something. Some people have friends that like to change their
font styles, sizes, and colors (colours for you brits out there). And txt
mode email doesnt allow that at all.
Don't forget, they top post too.
--
Greg
Want
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 09:04:20PM -0500, Todd Slater wrote:
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 05:35:43PM -0700, FemmeFatale wrote:
I'm going to risk abolishment to M$hits camp here or excommunication from
the Linux community by saying this... but what else is new?
Russ I have to agree with
Ok
i didnṫ express myself ouite clear enough
i got several accounts in hotmail and the easiest way to handel them is by
outlook express so that what i need.
Gil
On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:11, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 09:04:20PM -0500, Todd Slater wrote:
On Sat, Feb 08,
Ok, with all the recent hostility talks, and me switching e-mail
programs at home and at work, I need some help determining if this
software sends HTML e-mail, without the need to be flamed. While I
agree with the masses here, HTML e-mail is hard and annoying to read
and deal with, sometimes
MH wrote:
Now with that said, I would appreciate any help
on determining whether or not this e-mail program (Mail Warrior) sends
HTML by default, because I have not seen anything about the form of e-
mail it sends. Thank you all in advance.
Your email was in plain text. I checked it by
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 13:38:39 -0400
MH [EMAIL PROTECTED] cleverly noted:
Ok, with all the recent hostility talks, and me switching e-mail
programs at home and at work, I need some help determining if this
software sends HTML e-mail, without the need to be flamed. While I
agree with the
Randy, at least Netscape (and probably other HTML aware mail clients) can send
text, HTML, or both. Netscape defaults to sending both, which is why you
normally see the two copies you mention.
Warren
--
http://sites.netscape.net/srcopan/
Randy Kramer wrote:
AFAIK, HTML mails always include
42 matches
Mail list logo
