Does NetStumbler include the GPS co-ordinates? Could you post an example
of the output?
You may be able to use 'Splat' to map the APs.
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 08:53:20 -0700
From: Rogelio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [nycwireless] importing Netstumbler / AP info into Google
Map
Alex Pilosov wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, jh wrote:
Kevin M. Agard wrote:
I believe the answer to your question is yes, it is illegal.
You were saying? :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piggybacking_(internet_access)
See "United States" section. There are charges and convictions.
I had no ide
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, jh wrote:
> Kevin M. Agard wrote:
> > I believe the answer to your question is yes, it is illegal.
>
> The question, actually, was: "is there any case law, convictions, or
> anything indicating that this is illegal in any manner?"
>
> IANAL suppositions, while I tend to agre
Kevin M. Agard wrote:
I believe the answer to your question is yes, it is illegal.
The question, actually, was: "is there any case law, convictions, or
anything indicating that this is illegal in any manner?"
IANAL suppositions, while I tend to agree, are not entirely helpful.
The laws that
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:08:23AM -0500, Alex Pilosov wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, Kevin M. Agard wrote:
>
> > > If I leech bandwidth via Wi-Fi entering my home, and the AP is totally
> > > in the clear (i.e., SSID of "linksys" ;) ), is there any case law,
> > > convictions, or anything indicatin
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, Kevin M. Agard wrote:
> > If I leech bandwidth via Wi-Fi entering my home, and the AP is totally
> > in the clear (i.e., SSID of "linksys" ;) ), is there any case law,
> > convictions, or anything indicating that this is illegal in any
> > manner?
^
SSID of "linksys" does
I believe the answer to your question is yes, it is illegal.
Basically the laws here make the unauthorized access of a computer or
computer network illegal. While you may not access or attempt to access
the host network's computer(s), you are undeniably accessing the network.
So, even if the
Yeah ... if they can get that "Teleporter" module working in Q1 2008,
Im buying 2 of them for my wife ;-)
Very cool idea for wifi-enabled robotics I think.
- Jon
On Sep 17, 2007, at 9:28 PM, Dean Collins wrote:
I just posted this to my www.collins.net.pr/blog and thought it may
interest a f
Hi Kevin,
Thought these two blog posts might interest you
http://deancollinsblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/700-mhz-spectrum-auction.html
http://deancollinsblog.blogspot.com/2007/06/home-brew-startrek-communicator.html
Regards,
Dean Collins
Cognation Pty Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1-212-203-4357 Ph
+61
any chance this will be streamed online or conference call for example
for those of us on the West Coast? San Francisco, Slides? :-)
On 7/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Send nycwireless mailing list submissions to
nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
To subscribe o
Hello Rob,
I agree... I read this today in the NYT as well and was very
surprised no one picked up on it. I guess the iPhone over shadowed it,
which is a shame. The switching isn't impressive, it's the FREE on
802.11 that is. Start a call on 802.11 and there's no cost. And
supposedly roami
ture of the wireless bandwidth pig (A. Khattri)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 00:11:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: "A. Khattri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] Slurpr - the future of the wireless
bandwidth pig
To: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Message-ID: &l
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Jon Baer wrote:
> -snip-
> At this moment I can see 8 different signals. Some are closed
> networks but most are open and available. I can only connect to one
> at a time so I tend to just pick the one with the best signal. But
> what if I could connect to all the networks at
And unless he was mis-quoted, this Covad spokesperson is just plain
wrong on line-shared DSL definition. The DSL circuit is dedicated
bandwidth on each circuit -- NOT shared bandwidth like cable.
"Line-shared DSL" merely refers to sharing the physical medium
(telephone line), but the services
Lol - and wi-max isn't a shared medium and going to take the same hit at
3pm with all those kooky kids (ahmm you mean customers Mr Covad...?)
Bad PR spun wrong looking for a story (not that I'm against Wi-Max far
from it) I just hate when marketing speople get involved.
Regards,
Dean Collins
Like the PERM project?
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 3:00 AM
Subject: nycwireless Digest, Vol 50, Issue 10
> Send nycwireless mailing list submissions to
> nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Worl
2007/5/26, aMay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Jon, Hi all,
Can anyone introduce something about WeFi?
I come from China, I havn't heard about WeFi before.
I think it is just another wisher with another proprietary maps client
interface . better try to expand Wigle.net and filter for open hotspot
Hi Jon, Hi all,
Can anyone introduce something about WeFi?
I come from China, I havn't heard about WeFi before.
Thank you.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 3:00 AM
Subject: nycwireless Digest, Vol 50, Issue 8
> Send nycwireless mailing
Now that's well put. The state of US fraudband: "An Out of Control Spiral of
Disinvestment"
Now on Reddit: http://reddit.com/info/1sm8m/comments/c1sm91?context=5
and Digg:
http://digg.com/tech_news/Municipal_Broadband_Takes_On_The_Internet_Cartel
Vote it up on your site of choice...
-
You only have a few options for throughput as I see it.
1. Convert all clients to 802.11G
2. Setup 3 APs in the same area on channel 1, 6, 11 respectively
3. Move to a 802.11G plus 802.11A design.
a. 5ghz clients and APs all support 54mbps without worrying about
backwards compatibility with 1
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 10:18:13 -0400
From: "kati london" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [nycwireless] throughput & range question
To:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi,
I'm trying to expand on a current hardware platform which includ
: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] Breaking WEP in < 60 seconds
<http://www.churchofwifi.org/default.asp?PageLink=Project_Display.asp?
PID=95>
There is a 7GB table there.
Have you ever seen SPA (Single Packet Authentication)? Im a huge fan
of it and Im sure
, April 05, 2007 6:45 PM
To: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] Breaking WEP in < 60 seconds
Well I guess if you consider WEP = Worthless right off the bat + it
now
takes a minute for what took a few hours to do rehashed :-)
I think you don't have to look fur
2007 6:45 PM
To: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] Breaking WEP in < 60 seconds
Well I guess if you consider WEP = Worthless right off the bat + it now
takes a minute for what took a few hours to do rehashed :-)
I think you don't have to look further on WPA/2 attacks th
Well I guess if you consider WEP = Worthless right off the bat + it
now takes a minute for what took a few hours to do rehashed :-)
I think you don't have to look further on WPA/2 attacks than cowpatty
and rainbow tables, kinda primitive but still effective ...
http://www.churchofwifi.org/d
Hello Jon,
A good re-hash of old news. I'd like to see how attacks are
progressing against WPA and WPA2.
-Ben
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Baer
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 5:17 PM
To: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Su
Yeah - I think that there are very interesting possibilities. The key
would be to find the right information and project.
We just sent in an application for the Ars Electronica digital
communities prize. One of the things we said that we would be
interested in doing with the prize money would b
EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Sent: Thu Mar 15 23:10:37 2007
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] EVDO Rev A Feedback
Did you try Skype over it?
- Dustin
Ben R. Serebin wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> ** EVDO Primer for EVDO Feedback **
> EVDO Rev
Did you try Skype over it?
- Dustin
Ben R. Serebin wrote:
Hello All,
** EVDO Primer for EVDO Feedback **
EVDO Rev 0 - original version of Verizon/Sprint cellular broadband.
EVDO Rev A - version 2 of Verizon/Sprint cellular broadband
1xRTT - 1st Verizon/Sprint broadband* cellular marketed as
Dana, et al..
We just released a popular wimax community news and industry site.
Post all your wimax related issues and press releases at
http://wimax-coverage.com
It's already #17 in google under "wimax"
and page one under: "wimax access" and "wimax coverage"
so your stories will get thousands
The only Telkonet that I know of is a company manufacturing ethernet over
powerlines equipment.
Good product and very scalable.
Never heard of them operating wireless hotspots...
Regards, Evert Bopp.
--
Evert Bopp
CEO, WIMAX EU Holdings Ltd.
www.wimax-eu.com
T: +353 86 8645099
Skype: evert_bopp
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robin-David Hammond%KB3IEN
Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 11:41 AM
To: Jon Baer
Cc: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] OpenDNS?
I do not use this service as its claim to 'correct spelling mistakes'
must
I do not use this service as its claim to 'correct spelling mistakes' must
inherently chose one 'mistake' over another, sucks to be the guy whose
site isn't chosen. Additionally resolving false or mistyped domains
stands to break much spam filtering.
If you want reliable DNS root servers loo
Anyone wishing to get more involved in emergency comms would be well
advised to begin by obtaining a radio license, study can be done on the
web:
http://www.qrz.comgrep for 'Practice'.
When you can pass effectively drop me a line, I'll find you a testing
location.
High capacity trunks
My guess ...
There are probably a few items beyond physics that Id have a tough
time figuring out but if someone can look @ a board w/ blinking
lights of some type and see the B train is arriving at Broadway/
Lafayette and physically pick up a mic and announce it that taking
out the man-in
Hamachi is a cool app. But this is more of a peer to peer VPN? Meaning
every host you want secure communications must be running Hamachi also?
- Dustin -
Jon Baer wrote:
Another ...
http://www.hamachi.cc/
There is also a good quick comparison PDF located @
http://www.infosecwriters.com/tex
Now this is funny. I had the privilege to see the new all digital
dispacth center the MTA built. When I got a peek it looked operational
from technology perspective but was not yet staffed. Every single car on
ever single train on the covered lines was tracked down to the track
segment (point and
America's fall-behind on the technology side is a matter of fact not opinion.
The facts just need to get out more.
That's why the Moyers show is so great. It raises the profile of this
story. It's also really well done.
Watch Moyers:
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/moyersonamerica/media_players/c
America's fall-behind on the technology side is not a matter of fact.
The facts just need to get out more.
That's why the Moyers show is so great. It raises the profile of this
story. It's also really well done.
Watch Moyers:
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/moyersonamerica/media_players/chapter3-
Another ...
http://www.hamachi.cc/
There is also a good quick comparison PDF located @ http://
www.infosecwriters.com/texts.php?op=display&id=450 which does include
the drawbacks on the Iopus client.
- Jon
On Oct 20, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Dustin Goodwin wrote:
I assume your saying that all sh
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Kevin Mark wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 09:19:19PM -0400, Jon Baer wrote:
> > Saw this in the NYPost this morning ... I find it really hard to
> > believe that between RFID, WiFi, WiMax, etc that no technology can
> > t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 09:19:19PM -0400, Jon Baer wrote:
> Saw this in the NYPost this morning ... I find it really hard to
> believe that between RFID, WiFi, WiMax, etc that no technology can
> tell me simply when the next train is arriving. The
I assume your saying that all shell servers are also VPN providers by
assuming that SSH redirection is acceptable. IMHO SSH based port
redirect or socks proxy is not really a VPN. By my definition a VPN
consists of client software that provides a network driver shim that
encrypts all traffic le
Now thast it's aired once, you can watch the whole thing online from
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/moyersonamerica/media_players/chapter3-1.html
> All-
>
> Net Neutrality has been discussed vehemently and extensively on this
> list, so I urge everyone to watch Bill Moyer's in-depth examination
> o
This is fantastic! Looks like I have some experimenting to do.
Thanks so much!
Kind Regards,
Ronen Isaac
www.conticomp.com
AOL IM: ccro02
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:42 PM
To: n
On a side note I shot a short segment @ a cafe w/ David Pogue show
this week for Discovery/NYTimes channel. It should be on sometime in
January I was told. It was showing basic HTTP/POP/IMAP traffic w/ a
Mac OS X tool called Eavesdrop. Will post any further broadcast info
when I get it.
Wow, great resource!
http://wifidefense.cuzuco.com/
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There was a nycwirless presentation given two years ago on some
ways to secure connections. Mainly it describes how to
create ssh tunnels, but has other information as well.
PDF of the slides are at http://wifidefens
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Baer
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 5:57 PM
To: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] RE: Secure your Public Wi-Fi Connections with
FREEiPig BETA download
Ok here's the question ...
(Not to knock the pr
This isn't the place to flog revenue generating warez. This doesn't seem to
have anything to do with wireless as opposed to wired 'hostile' segments. Given
the warez in question and the accompanying PR
blob, I'd like to point out a few flaws:
Thats a contradiction in terms, powerful and 256b
Ok here's the question ...
(Not to knock the product, just a personal question)
Do people actually *trust* 3rd party VPNs? Would you trust the
"iOpus' secure connection servers deep in the Internet."? I fully
agree w/ the CTO's comment but would you download + trust the app
after the zer
Stompboxes are what I'm familiar with. It's an open-source
distribution that takes an EVDO card:
http://www.stompboxnetworks.com/
There's also the overpriced Junxion box:
http://www.junxion.com/product/#models
For data, I sense it's a weighing of both speed (3g or near 3g) and
cost. Sprint
Jeff:
http://soekris.hejl.de/
That's pretty cool. I'd love my Soekris to have a simple LCD display.
Just to be able to see what's happening on boot without have to
serial into it. For a park, it'd need to be all-weather. Sample
prices seems kinda steep though
(http://www.crystalfontz.
On 9/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Photos of the little thing.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
I'd love to know if you could use a soekris or wrap box with that
touch screen.
you could maybe it do fun little visualizations of traffic and usage
patterns. Or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 05:25:02PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From the but-can-I-hack-it-into-a-hotspot department:
> [http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/05/hands-on-with-the-chumby/]
>
> and
>
> from [http://www.chumby.com/]
>
> "Introducing ch
Michel,
I think you might be misreading that email announcing the FON
presentation.
NYCwireless does not have any partnership with FON. In addition, we
have not participated in (nor have we yet been engaged to participate
with) FON's plan to hand out routers for an East Village project.
Awesome! I won't be around, but please take photos, and keep
documentation! This is huge!
Also, do you know how you're going to gather people's data?
Dana Spiegel
Executive Director
NYCwireless
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.NYCwireless.net
+1 917 402 0422
Read the Wireless Community blog: http://www
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question: for optimal reception, is it better to have a
highpowered card with a basic antenna (senao) or a lower powered card
with an excellent antenna (orinoco)?
i assume you want to use kismet or variant to passively scan and map the
local network ecosystem
Cellular broadband will someday be a viable alternative to wired
broadband. That said, it is highly doubtful wireless cellular broadband
will ever be as fast as wired solutions. So for the foreseeable future
we will be stuck with the cable/telco duopoloy. While a robust free and
open market pla
For an alternative point of view, check out this terrific piece by
Harold Feld -- who starts from the premise that "auctions are a
really bad way to distribute access rights to spectrum.":
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:30:44 -0400
Sender: Telecom Regulation & the Internet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From
http://www.franson.com/gpsgate/
A full description of my mobile setup is here in my blog:
http://www.unwiredadventures.com/unwire/2006/05/ultimate_automo.html
Frank Keeney
http://www.wlanparts.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [nycwireless] Fw: Re:
This is all great information.
The idea is to have a set of peripherals that a user with an average
laptop could plug in.
But now I wondet if the equipment in AirTouchNetworks the best compilation?
http://www.airtouchnetworks.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=ass&Product_Code=D
I'm biased, I sell this stuff but my personal favorite mobile antenna is the
Comet 7.4dbi SF-245SPR. I've tried them all, this is the one mounted on my
own car.
Also, I find the Senao NL-2511CD PLUS EXT2 outperforms the Orinoco.
Frank Keeney
http://www.wlanparts.com
> -Original Message--
How about using Navizon of NYC (www.navizon.com) for both, wardriving and
Wi-Fi positioning? It's a free for non-commercial use.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Kelley
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 2:45 PM
To: nycwireless@lists.n
What kind of press release can we do for MSP that builds on and
distinguishes itself from these releases?
R
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/07/nyregion/07wifi.html
>
> [dead tree version: B2]
>
> July 7, 2006
>
> New York to Examine Creating Citywide Broadband Network
> By SEWELL CHAN
>
>
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, David Beery wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 11:29:19PM -0400, Bob Keyes mangled the electrons to
> say:
> >
> You left out a major, but often silent player in the wireless space -
> Licensed microwave.
Yes, thanks for pointing this out.
> Properly engineered links can del
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 11:29:19PM -0400, Bob Keyes mangled the electrons to
say:
>
> While we're here, let me talk about some muni wifi things that I've
> figured out.
>
> While this post is long, please don't consider it a finished document.
> There's some wordsmithing, and documentation of so
I'm happy to see someone else pointing out.
When I first read the article I thought "what the heck are they
announcing?". It'd be nice to have some sort of measurement for the
level and density of a wireless rollout. Especially for cities. I
mean, is it one-AP per block or per zip code?
I al
While we're here, let me talk about some muni wifi things that I've
figured out.
While this post is long, please don't consider it a finished document.
There's some wordsmithing, and documentation of some of the claims I make,
which still needs to be done. This will happen. Eventually.
Firstly,
Kimo:
That headline is misleading just like the original article.
Earthlink is playing up what, IMHO, is essentially non-news. They're
starting their rollout. Big deal.
They'll be done in December. They don't say what done means. Pretty cheap.
But nowhere in their materials do they say
Dana, wWill NYCW make use of the city's GIS-Mapping services?
http://gis.nyc.gov/doitt/mp/Portal.do
http://www.nyc.gov/html/doitt/html/eservices/eservices_gis.shtml
--
Frank A. Coluccio
DTI Consulting Inc.
212-587-8150 Office
347-526-6788 Mobile
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
U
Let us know you're coming on Meet-up.com:
http://wifi.meetup.com/236/events/4958871/t/nr1_nr
Quoting Joe Plotkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
NYCwireless June Meeting Announcement
All are invited - please re-post everywhere!
TOMORROW NIGHT!
Wednesday, June 28th, 2006 at 7:15pm
Bway.net
568 Broadway
Dana Spiegel wrote:
We're planning on installing a hotspot at Madison Square Park on
Saturday, June 24. If you are interested in helping out with this
installation, please email me directly.
We'll be trying to include some training on how to:
1) set up a Supernode using Soekris hardware
2) set
They look very interesting (especially the cost and size). What kind
of range can you expect from a 2dBi antenna in an open air situation?
Thanks,
Michael
On 6/4/06, Dana Spiegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://meraki.net/mini.html
This looks like an interesting product. Do people have ide
Has anyone here w/ a MacBook experienced any connection issues
pertaining to the router? Ive seen tons of postings about it ... ie:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=374652&tstart=120
Ive had a PowerBook G4 on OpenWRT for a long time and have had no
issues whatsoever, but my
Ming,
What are you basing this statement on? I've used many revisions of
the 54G and the new 54GL and have never had the problem you
highlight. Neither have many other users of this particular Linksys
product.
Furthermore, Netgear is not really supported for using with OpenWRT.
I believ
Hi Ming:
Good to hear your opinion.
We're running half a dozen of these right now with no such problem. Maybe
it's because we're ditching Linksys's default firmware for openwrt and
wifidog
http://openwrt.org
http://wifidog.org
Rob
Ming Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Actually the Linkysis product you referenced really sucks! It stalls on you
every 2 weeks and then you have to reset it again. It's not worth the money
-- Netgear is a better product!
m
On 6/1/06, Rob Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm following up some requests from last night.
If you'r
Sorry for posting this here but the Email address for you failed. You know who
you are.
/*
---
*/
Thanks for the great site. I have updated my web page with this link.
I also wonder about the FCC here? I sure
Which is why they only had 3 respondents to the original RFP (Verizon
was one, and declined the winning bid 1 month after it was awarded to
them), and why there are only 3 parks that have been awarded in the
current 6 park RFP, one of which was awarded to Friends of Dag
Hammarskjold and NYC
So Parks department wants you to pay them an annual fee, share a cut of
any revenue, pay to install the equipment and operate the network. Is it
me or is this going to make it hard for anyone to do deploy a service?
- Dustin -
Dana Spiegel wrote:
On May 17, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Dustin Goodwin w
On May 17, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Dustin Goodwin wrote:
I have been reading all the stories around the Parks Dept. plans
and franchise they granted to Wifi Salon etc.
1. I was surprised that the franchise agreement from the city to
the providers set deadline for turning on service. It does not
This may not be complete, accurate, or anywhere near comprehensive.
I'll leave it to Dana to critique:
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22454543
Dana?
---
Frank A. Coluccio
DTI Consulting Inc.
New York, NY 10038
347-526-6788
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/
On Mon, 15 May 2006, Dustin Goodwin wrote:
> A) NYCwireless isn't "moving" anywhere. We support and encourage the
> marketplace and fair competition as the primary tools to creating better
> broadband services for everyone.
Then why promote the principles that seem to discourage competition? If I
A) NYCwireless isn't "moving" anywhere. We support and encourage the
marketplace and fair competition as the primary tools to creating better
broadband services for everyone.
B) This isn't regulation and it's not a contract. We expect companies
that publicly support these principles to conduct bus
On Mon, 15 May 2006, Dustin Goodwin wrote:
> While Washington DC types try to figure out a solution to the Network
> Neutrality problem. NYCwireless continues to drive the industry towards
> NN via the NYCwireless Network Neutrality Broadband Challenge Please
> contact your ISP and ask them to ple
Ok got the history. But today I don't pay for Internet so I can be
connected to your home PC. I pay so I have access to the content
providers in your colo.
- Dustin -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2006, Dustin Goodwin wrote:
Since you seems to work with the cable guys. Is the
On Mon, 15 May 2006, Dustin Goodwin wrote:
> Since you seems to work with the cable guys. Is the group think
> occurring here that consumers would pay for broadband services if there
> were no content providers? That we all just paying to connect to each
> other? And content providers need to pay
Jim,
Since you seems to work with the cable guys. Is the group think
occurring here that consumers would pay for broadband services if there
were no content providers? That we all just paying to connect to each
other? And content providers need to pay beyond basic peering to provide
content to
For me, power has been MORE important than connectivity. I can check
my email with my phone, but if I need to work on something I need my
laptop which needs power. This became more important as my laptop's
batteries aged. And then of course, what if your phone's dead. You
don't need wi-fi, you
Not a bad idea. esp the shade one, with summer comming and all.
Complementary power outlets seem to be a thorny issue, if coffee shops provide
ready access to power, hotspots become areas of poor circulation, with all the
issues that causes for buisness owners.
I am curious: How many people
You can use Wi-Fi Thank You for this.
http://www.wifithankyou.com
Dana Spiegel
Executive Director
NYCwireless
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.NYCwireless.net
+1 917 402 0422
Read the Wireless Community blog: http://www.wirelesscommunity.info
On May 11, 2006, at 11:34 PM, Kevin Mark wrote:
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 08:30:01PM -0400, Jon Baer wrote:
> 7. Good music
>
> It would be pretty nice to have something like the NYCWireless Cafe
> of the Month/Year or some type of award (or spotlight) that
> recognizes a coffee shop for it's exc
7. Good music
It would be pretty nice to have something like the NYCWireless Cafe
of the Month/Year or some type of award (or spotlight) that
recognizes a coffee shop for it's excellence in making the WiFi
junkie feel most @ home. Id personally nominate the Tea Lounge on
Union in Brookly
Jim,
I'm glad to see that you are finally coming around to our way of thinking
regarding that the Consumers pay for access on their end and the content
providers pay for access on their end. You got that much right. Where you
are still a little confused is using AT&T and Verizon in the same sent
, vade wrote:
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 14:46:06 -0400
From: vade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] Antenna Vendor in NYC?
Thank you so much. I visited Barry Electronics, and they were very very
helpful. Funny you mention AMV. Ive worked wit
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Rob Kelley wrote:
> I can't tell how much of this is FUD (Fear Uncertainty and Doubt)
> reporting, but it's on AP and ABCNews...
Hrm, typical journalism
> Does anyone else know what's really going on with the St. Cloud
> deployment? IMO, it looks like a problem with use
Thank you so much. I visited Barry Electronics, and they were very
very helpful. Funny you mention AMV. Ive worked with them before, but
forgot that they might have wireless video solutions. Regardless, for
my purposes they are way out of my price range.
Thanks again for the help.
On Apr
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Dana Spiegel wrote:
> Content providers (who are only 1 aspect of people who provide
> information/service on the net) already pay for their pipe. AT&T and
> Verizon's concept of freedom isn't freedom at all. Its double taxation.
> You would have a content provider pay for the
bunch of hypocritical bs, though there are a few well
intentioned
individuals involved in it.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: MAX Wireless [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 12:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Dana Spiegel';
nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
Subject
dividuals involved in it.
Jim
> -Original Message-
> From: MAX Wireless [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 12:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Dana Spiegel';
> nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
> Subject: RE: [nycwireless] Fwd: Congress is selli
1 - 100 of 2710 matches
Mail list logo
