While I remember, one other dependency to note. Whoever takes the lead
on security communications should also be added as a moderator on
ooo-announce. This is so they can let their own security bulletin
posts through without delay.
-Rob
On Sep 12, 2012, at 6:51 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sep
On Sep 12, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are the changes to moderation that will be requested shortly. If anyone
> else would like to be added please respond. I will create a JIRA issue for
> the changes this weekend.
>
> Please open another email thread to either discuss
On Sep 11, 2012, at 2:51 PM, sean gayton wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi, My name is Sean and my peer is Bianca (cc'd) and we're looking to help
> contribute to Open Office.We were hoping we could assist with some
> documentation in creating a simple user guide and installation guide for
> computer illit
FYI. This was moderated in. Please cc the original poster.
Rob
On Sep 11, 2012, at 6:14 AM, Jesper Thomsen wrote:
> Hi Apache Team,
>
> Roozz is a Danish startup and we have a technology that can turn Windows
> desktop software into online browser versions running in any Windows OS and
> any b
On Sep 11, 2012, at 12:27 AM, "Jürgen Schmidt" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> based on an enquiry for some partnership I think it make sense to
> discuss a general question. Which features, improvements, enhancements
> should be part of AOO by default or which belongs more in a broader
> eco-system around AOO
On Sep 11, 2012, at 2:52 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Sep 10, 2012, at 10:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Sep 10, 2012, at 7:17 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Dennis is handling transitions on ooo-private. I'm traveling tomorrow
On Sep 10, 2012, at 7:52 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a code of conduct here:
> http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/list-conduct.html
>
> These are the community's code and we should all agree to abide by the code.
> Maybe there is some more work to do exposing the code. Maybe
On Sep 10, 2012, at 7:17 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dennis is handling transitions on ooo-private. I'm traveling tomorrow and
> will put together a final list and write the JIRA issue for Apache Infra.
>
Is there a reason why this discussion cannot be on ooo-dev?
> If you are a project
On Sep 10, 2012, at 11:32 AM, TJ Frazier wrote:
> On 9/9/2012 12:25, David McKay wrote:
>>
>> On 09/09/12 17:19, David McKay wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/09/12 22:06, TJ Frazier wrote:
>>>> On 9/8/2012 16:50, tj wrote:
>>>>> On 9/8/2012 12:01,
On Sep 9, 2012, at 2:51 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 09/08/2012 02:15 PM, tj wrote:
>> On 9/8/2012 13:50, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 7, 2012, at 6:50 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I would like to give my thoughts on defining roles for management,
... as th
On Sep 8, 2012, at 12:41 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Since Rob and Dennis will be leaving their ML moderators it is time to
> revisit all of the lists. There are others that need action. I think we
> should be replacing mentors (unless they explicitly choose to remain.)
>
> I think the a
I'm raising my focus a little in this project to look more into some
larger ecosystem opportunities. As part of this change in focus I'll
have less time to deal with day-to-day operational aspects of the
project. So I'd like to shed some responsibilities and I hope there
are volunteers able or will
On Sep 7, 2012, at 8:42 AM, Andrew Rist wrote:
> I'm not particularly satisfied with current PMC selection process. I think
> the first pass was actually fairly reasonable, and fairly quickly resulted in
> a list that contains the people who are serious about the project.
> Unfortunately, we
On Aug 30, 2012, at 12:57 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> This morning the en-Forum received the following query
> http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=55992
>
> To save you looking it up, the User asked if there would be a torrent
> connection for AOO 3.4.x, as there ha
On Sep 6, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Sep 6, 2012, at 5:42 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
>>> Think of an orchestra. We don't expect every player to play every
>>> instrument. But w
On Sep 5, 2012, at 9:20 AM, "Jürgen Schmidt" wrote:
> On 9/5/12 11:32 AM, Ian Lynch wrote:
>> On 5 September 2012 09:40, Regina Henschel wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> some time ago we expressed, that we think the project is ready to graduate.
>>> In the process of graduating, a proposal for a Proje
On Sep 4, 2012, at 7:11 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi John,
>
>>> Are there any updates on this? I have asked a little while ago with no
>>> response. I am willing to get this up and running. Please let me know.
>>>
>>
>
> I'd like to preface Rob's answers with a couple of remarks.
>
> I went to yo
On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:21 PM, John wrote:
> Are there any updates on this? I have asked a little while ago with no
> response. I am willing to get this up and running. Please let me know.
>
Is it clear, from the previous discussions, what the range of concerns
were? If so feel free to make a pro
On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:55 AM, Torokhov Sergey wrote:
> On Friday 24 of August 2012 17:19:33 Phillip Rhodes wrote:
>> Somebody slap my wrist or correct me if this is redundant, or in the
>> wrong place, but I didn't see anything
>> on the wiki related to AOO4 brainstorming, so I created this:
>>
>>
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Keith N. McKenna
wrote:
> Good Day All;
>
> Today I am going to venture into the breach and bring up a topic that in my
> experience is most developers favorite profanity: i.e. User Documentation.
> One of the major reasons I have used and promoted OpenOffice.org i
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 29.08.2012 16:02, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just saw that we have now two new binary files in the test/ module.
&
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Joost Andrae wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> in my opinion a source control system should not be used to store binary
> objects. Quite probable multiple copies of the same binary are stored within
> the SVN system if you branch the source tree. Additionally the backup of SVN
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just saw that we have now two new binary files in the test/ module.
>
> main/test/testgui/data/svt/complex.ods has a size of 9 424 385 Bytes and
> main/test/testgui/data/svt/complex.odt has a size of 27 175 936 Bytes.
>
> I wonder i
That record did not last long. We broke the record the very next day
(Tuesday) The new one-day download record is 192,305.
-Rob
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> Yesterday (Monday) we had 188,971 downloads of AOO. This beats our
> previous one-day download record of 1
Done.
-Rob
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Ji Yan wrote:
> Hi BZ admin,
>
> We are requesting for a keyword, something like "automation_bug", which
> could be used to identify the issue found by automation test.
>
> --
>
>
> Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Michal Hriň wrote:
>
>> Yesterday (Monday) we had 188,971 downloads of AOO. This beats our
>> previous one-day download record of 187,336 which was set on May 13th.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -Rob
>
>
> Congrats !
>
> Do we have separate numbers for languages ? Slovak,
Yesterday (Monday) we had 188,971 downloads of AOO. This beats our
previous one-day download record of 187,336 which was set on May 13th.
Regards,
-Rob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
CVE-2012-2665 Manifest-processing errors in Apache OpenOffice 3.4.0
Reference: http://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2012-2665.html
Severity: Important
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Apache OpenOffice 3.4.0, all
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Aug 27, 2012, at 2:13 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> People trust the Apache brand.
>>> They download Apache "stuff" from somewhere.
>>> That stuff is signed by an entity that is associated
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:43 PM, drew wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 13:22 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>> By default blog questions are held for moderation. I just checked and
>> we had quite a few comments. I let the non-spam ones through:
>>
>> https:/
Changing the subject to something more accurate due to thread drift.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Aug 27, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>>
>> Identity != Trust.
>>
>> Identity + Reputation == Trust.
>>
&g
By default blog questions are held for moderation. I just checked and
we had quite a few comments. I let the non-spam ones through:
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/announcing_apache_openoffice_3_41#comments
I responded to one, but since there are a few of them I could use some
help respondi
itten for experts in the field. Different
> target audiences with totally different fields of applicability.
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: Rob Weir
>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 12:34 PM
>>
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Bullshit. The policy is as old as the org itself and applies equally
>
The problem is that when someone questions what the policy is, as
several IPMC members have already, the response goes no further than
yelling that the policy is well-kn
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> After this, please drop general@
>
> On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>>>
>>> A signature does 2 things:
>>>
>>> 1. Ensures that no bits have been changed
>>>
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Re adding ooo-dev@ since this is STILL an AOO issue.
>
> On Aug 27, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 27, 2012, at 8:56
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> BTW,
>
> - Original Message -
> ...
>>>
>>> This is already part of the current process. The signatures are in
>> download_external_dependencies.pl. The Central Maven Repository uses these as
>> well.
>>>
>>
>> Those are MD5 hashes,
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if the ´new management´ at AOO ;) has any plans with regards to
> ´long term support´ for AOO?.
>
We've discussed this topic previously. You'll read more if you search
the list archives for "LTS".
IMHO the point of LTS i
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Aug 26, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We need to do more work to have proper compliance with Apache
>
n Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Dave Fisher
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We need to do more work to have proper compliance with Apache
>> Infrastructure policy in managing external dependencies.
>>>
>>
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We need to do more work to have proper compliance with Apache Infrastructure
> policy in managing external dependencies.
>
> I may not be precisely correct and am looking for confirmation, but In
> general i think we need to
>
> (1) C
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:03 AM, RGB ES wrote:
> 2012/8/26 Rob Weir :
>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:31 AM, RGB ES wrote:
>>> Adding to the (lack of) redirection problem between the old and the
>>> new URL expressed on other threads, there are other problems reported
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:31 AM, RGB ES wrote:
> Adding to the (lack of) redirection problem between the old and the
> new URL expressed on other threads, there are other problems reported
> by users. The first one is that forum notifications still arrive with
> only the old URL. Also, there are u
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> Moving back to AOO lists
>
> These argument is a waste of everyones time. It seems to me that what is/is
> not permissible is clear, indeed has been clear for some time.the summary
> is... Patches welcome.
>
Clear to some, but obviously not c
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone inspected the MIME Type returned? If it is not a proper
>> one for OXT then it is possible that IE8 is doing detection of the
>> type.
>
>
> I had different results than Dave's, and I concluded I see diff
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 08/25/2012 01:28 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>> On 23/08/2012 22:06, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>>>
>>> Also IMHO no need to separate between the languages.
>>> Furthermore, when you have to check for a potential error, then you you
>>> just n
the translation and than I'll send it to you.
>
Excellent!
-Rob
> Jürgen
>
> Am 25.08.2012 20:31, schrieb Rob Weir:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Jürgen Lange wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> I can't find a german an
Lieder ist mein
Deutsch sehr schlecht. Ich habe Deutsch 25 Jahre fruer studierte aber
habe ganz alles vergessen. Denn brauche ich deine hilfe mit der
Uebersetzung ;-)
-Rob
> Jürgen
>
>
> Am 25.08.2012 19:36, schrieb Rob Weir:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Andrea Pesce
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 21/08/2012 Sylvain DENIS wrote:
>>
>> I translated the text AOO 3.4.1 French. I would put online after the
>> official version.
>
>
> Thanks, I've committed this to the French site using the naming conventions
> currently used there, so
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:45:18 -0400
> Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>> >
>> > Rob
>> >
>> > Might we have a count of AOO 3.4.1 d
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:44:34 -0400
> Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>> > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:29:57 -0400
>> > "Maurice Howe"
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Keith N. McKenna
wrote:
> Hello All;
>
> I have a proposed draft of a template for use in creating Release Notes
> at:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release+Notes+Template.
I like it. It did not apply in 3.4.1 since it was a maintenanc
2012/8/24 Michal Hriň :
> This patch (translation) wants to be applied to main (en-US) page.
>
> Will be reverted.
>
Right. It should be placed in the specific NL directory. Either
zh-tw or zh-cn (I'm not sure which it is).
-Rob
> Michal Hriň
>
> Dňa Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:00:27 +0200 Anonymous C
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Aug 24, 2012, at 8:00 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 24, 2012, at 7:48 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>
>>> Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:17:57 +0100
Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:1
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:29:57 -0400
> "Maurice Howe" wrote:
>
>> I use AVG 2012.0.2180 Free Edition
>>
> I installed AOO 3.4.1 on one of my Windows machines today and AVG didn't
> complain. I'll check in detail tomorrow when the machine is
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
> In due course, when we've all had a little rest after the release of AOO
> 3.4.1, it will be necessary to do some triage work on the Brainstorming, so
> that the most requested changes make their way onto the planning table for
> AOO 4.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:23 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 24 August 2012 11:51, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:31:05 +0100
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 24 August 2012 09:20, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>>> > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:01:42 -0400
>>> > "Maurice Howe" wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Got a warni
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
> Rob
>
> Might we have a count of AOO 3.4.1 downloads in first 24 hours? No need for
> fancy graphics - a list would be OK.
>
First, you need to know that the SF numbers are daily numbers, and
based on a UTC day. Since we announced mid-
ke : erack PPMC
>> Manfred Reiter : fredao PPMC
>> Zoltán Reizinger : r4zoli PPMC
>> RGB.ES : rgb-es PPMC
>> Phillip Rhodes : prhodes PPMC
>> Andrew Rist : arist PPMC
>> Lawrence Rosen : lrosen PPMC
>> Roberto Salomon : salomon PPM
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> RGB ES wrote:
>>
>> 2012/8/23 Rory O'Farrell:
>>>
>>> Announced on the en-Forum and by PM to the Volunteers.
>>
>> Announced on ES forums. IT forums are not working...
>
>
> As discussed in other threads, the IT forum now works thanks to im
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:37 PM, RGB ES wrote:
> 2012/8/23 Kay Schenk :
>> Way back in late April, Juergen proposed a new directory structure for
>> release packs than what we have now which is essentially:
>>
>> /stable/VERSION/
>> /localized//VERSION/
>>
>> there are some other areas in SF as we
t;> >
>> > Also, this seems like a very good time to review, for the benefit of all
>> > here, what the duties of PMC members are and, with respect to that, what
>> > the specific responsibilities of the Chair are and what the special
>> > standing of
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:08 PM, imacat wrote:
> On 2012/08/22 11:24, Albino B Neto said:
>> Hi
>>
>> 2012/8/21 Rob Weir :
>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:18 AM, eric wu wrote:
>>>> ok,thank you for your suggestion,now i will prepare for my translations!
&
we will need to go through it, clause by
clause, in separate votes.
-Rob
> - Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 11:30
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed PMC
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Aug 23, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
>> wrote:
>>> I suggest that the initial Project Management Committee (PMC) needs to be
>>> id
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>> I'm not comfortable having a PMC Chair election and nomination on ooo-dev.
>>
>
> It appears the IPMC was able to do this for their own Chair.
>
>> I als
> the Chair is so its accountability can be carried out.
>>
>> - Dennis
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 10:36
>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: [DI
the
> specific responsibilities of the Chair are and what the special standing of
> the Chair is so its accountability can be carried out.
>
Indeed. That is why my 2nd sentence was to point to a link that
describes exactly this.
-Rob
> - Dennis
>
>
>
>
Now that the community graduation ballot has passed, one of our next
tasks is to identify a PMC Chair.
You can read about the duties of a PMC Chair here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#chair
How do we want to do this?
A strawman proposal:
1) Nominations would be open for 72 hours. Anyone c
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> as the so called release manager I would like to give an update where we
>> are with the release and the final release preparation.
>>
>&
The Apache OpenOffice project is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1, the latest release of the
free and open community-developed productivity suite. This
maintenance release builds upon the success of Apache OpenOffice
3.4.0, which has been downloaded over 12
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as the so called release manager I would like to give an update where we
> are with the release and the final release preparation.
>
> You all know we passed the PPMC and IPMC vote successful, the first
> important step towards our r
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 02:18:22PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> I was too fast and should have read the thread completely.
>>
>> I can't remember the reason why I left out the en-US lang packs, we
>> should check if they are necess
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 08:36:56PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>> > We'll nede Juergen to upload that and SF to copy it. With the time
>> > zone difference (Hamburg versus California) this will not happen
>&
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> We are really getting ahead of ourselves.
>
> We have a legitimate -1 IPMC vote on our release, it might get changed -
> Marvin asked for confirmation that the IPMC votes are based only on the
> official SOURCE release.
>
> I lo
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> Am 08/23/2012 12:41 AM, schrieb drew:
>>>
>>> OK one bad link on the other downloads page, so far
>>>
>>> The Mac en_US language pack p
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 08/23/2012 01:26 AM, schrieb drew:
>
>> On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 01:16 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 08/23/2012 12:54 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:50
The community vote has passed.
Vote reference: http://s.apache.org/5GA
+1
RGB-ES
Rory O'Farrell
Carl Marcum
Reizinger Zoltan
Keith N. McKenna
Kay Schenk
Roberto Galoppini
Imacat
Andrea Pescetti
Regina Henschel
Graham Lauder
Jürgen Lange
T.J. Frazier
Rob Weir
Dave Fisher
Peter Junge
Chri
r checking the links, I have downloaded
>>> the german version for windows, have installed it (Windows XP SP3) and
>>> made first tests. All is working fine so far.
>>>
>>> Jürgen
>>>
>>> Am 23.08.2012 00:09, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>>>
&
n version for windows, have installed it (Windows XP SP3) and
>> > made first tests. All is working fine so far.
>> >
>> > Jürgen
>> >
>> > Am 23.08.2012 00:09, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:58 PM, drew wrote:
>> &g
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:58 PM, drew wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 17:29 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>> So some possible confusion coming. I'm seeing a few websites have
>> already announced 3.4.1 and are pushing users to www.openoffice.org.
>> Of course, they are not f
So some possible confusion coming. I'm seeing a few websites have
already announced 3.4.1 and are pushing users to www.openoffice.org.
Of course, they are not finding AOO 3.4.1 there yet.
For example this article is being spread via Twitter:
http://majorgeeks.com/Apache_OpenOffice.org_For_Windows
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 08/22/2012 10:18 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Marcus (OOo)
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Am 08/
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Michal Hriň wrote:
> Dňa Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:40:05 +0200 Rob Weir napísal:
>
>
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Marcus (OOo)
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 08/22/2012 06:15 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>>>
>>&
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> Am 08/22/2012 06:15 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/21/2012 02:46 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Am 08/21/2
t;
>>>> On 08/21/2012 01:27 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/21/12 9:19 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/21/12 7:51 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tu
164 ideas and cast 1,852 votes until now
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>> >
>> > On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 , Rob Weir
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Shenfeng Liu
>> >> >
>> >> wrote:
>>
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:54 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 22 August 2012 07:05, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 21 August 2012 22:23, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Why? Could very well have a "publish all changes" mode (the current
only option) alongside the "cherry picking" (publi
Hi Dave,
Roberto's probably long asleep at this hour, so I hope you can pass
this on to someone at SourceForge who might be still up in California.
We're seeing widespread download errors when downloading OpenOffice.
There was probably some prep work going on to get ready for the 3.4.1
release of
I placed an outage notice on the download page, to let visitors know
they don't need to report the issue.
-Rob
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Wilson Goh wrote:
>> Hello webmaster, there is a broken link,
>> http://sour
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Wilson Goh wrote:
> Hello webmaster, there is a broken link,
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.0/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe/download
>
Aside from the error, why is the error page this:
http:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
> Back to the topic... :) The page looks great! I submitted 1 UI proposal and
> voted for some others...
>
So far: 117 people have submitted 103 ideas and cast 902 votes
-Rob
> - Simon
>
>
> 2012/8/22 Rob Weir
>
&g
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Phillip Rhodes
wrote:
> Per Rob's email about the "Help us brainstorm ideas for Apache
> OpenOffice 4.0" I was perusing the Google Moderator doc[1] and came
> across this suggestion:
>
> "Provide social capabilities within core editors to share selection,
> page/sh
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 8/21/12 9:19 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> On 8/21/12 7:51 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Jürgen Schmidt
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 8/21/12 5:45 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>&g
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Andrea Pescetti
>> wrote:
>> > Rob Weir wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I agree that we should have some mentio
Forwarded with permission of the author. I corrected the English
version. Translators should take note.
-Rob
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daniel Naber
Date: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:07 PM
Subject: Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 announcement
To: robw...@apache.org
Hi Rob,
I'm the ma
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> I agree that we should have some mention of other versions or
>> distributions that are based on AOO code, even if they are not
>> strictly "ports". The question is where to menti
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 8/21/12 5:45 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> FYI
>>
>> we have passed the vote on general@incubator. We can now proceed with
>> the release preparation ...
>
> I am waiting on the ok of infrastructure to start the upload, will keep
> you in
As we perform the final preparations to release Apache OpenOffice
3.4.1 it is a good time to look ahead to the future. A big
opportunity is OpenOffice 4.0. That once seemed so very far away, but
2013 is getting closer every day. Will it be a large collection of
small ideas? Will it have a majo
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:18 AM, eric wu wrote:
> ok,thank you for your suggestion,now i will prepare for my translations!
>
And the announcement blog post draft is here:
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=announcing_apache_openoffice_3_41
Regards,
-Rob
>
>
> eric wu
>
> From
301 - 400 of 3255 matches
Mail list logo
