Hello,
The registration link for OpenOffice brings up an error page. Here's the link
and error message:
https://registration2.services.openoffice.org/RegistrationWeb/register/urn:st:e7251802-3c52-4e08-a74f-a22eca7458ff?product=OpenOffice.org&locale=en&cid=926117
This webpage is not
Hello! I would like to subscribe to this mailing list please.
All the best,
Genny
Hi Tobias,
Thanks for the report on the registration page. This outage is
intentional. We are no longer doing user registration with
OpenOffice.org. Our next release will remove this option so you do
not get that error message.
The closes thing to "registration" we have is a mailing
Perhaps the register landing page should point to a page with this
information.
(and maybe a plug for AOO and the Apache Way, etc.)
A.
On 3/19/2012 5:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
Hi Tobias,
Thanks for the report on the registration page. This outage is
intentional. We are no longer doing user
Since we can't control existing distributions:
To dos would be.
(1) Create a page that explains things either in the podling site, either wiki,
or ooo-site.
(2) Redirect all registration[0-9].services.openoffice.org requests to that
page. This would be a JIRA ticket for INFRA after doi
s for downloading OpenOffic.org
" ?? That would then cover both bases.
> (2) Redirect all registration[0-9].services.openoffice.org requests to that
> page. This would be a JIRA ticket for INFRA after doing (1)
>
> Volunteers?
>
If there are no objections I'll do the ab
he bases, getting help, mailing lists,
etc. It even might direct some dimes to the treasury.
Maybe just change the header to "Thanks for downloading OpenOffic.org
" ?? That would then cover both bases.
> (2) Redirect all registration[0-9].services.openoffice.org requests to that
page. T
251802-3c52-4e08-a74f-a22eca7458ff?product=OpenOffice.org&locale=en&cid=926117
So it does have a "locale" parameter. My guess is the legacy
registration server used that info to provide a localized registration
form.
Currently we don't have an equivalent page in other l
>
> https://registration2.services.openoffice.org/RegistrationWeb/register/urn:st:e7251802-3c52-4e08-a74f-a22eca7458ff?product=OpenOffice.org&locale=en&cid=926117
>
> So it does have a "locale" parameter. My guess is the legacy
> registration server used that inf
>>
>>
>> Good question. OOo 3.3 sends a request with a URL like this:
>>
>> https://registration2.services.openoffice.org/RegistrationWeb/register/urn:st:e7251802-3c52-4e08-a74f-a22eca7458ff?product=OpenOffice.org&locale=en&cid=926117
>>
>> So it
2-3c52-4e08-a74f-a22eca7458ff?product=OpenOffice.org&locale=en&cid=926117
>>>
>>> So it does have a "locale" parameter. My guess is the legacy
>>> registration server used that info to provide a localized registration
>>> form.
>>>
&
>>>>
>>>> https://registration2.services.openoffice.org/RegistrationWeb/register/urn:st:e7251802-3c52-4e08-a74f-a22eca7458ff?product=OpenOffice.org&locale=en&cid=926117
>>>>
>>>> So it does have a "locale" parameter. My guess is the legacy
On 20/03/2012 16:32, Rob Weir wrote:
So it does have a "locale" parameter. My guess is the legacy
registration server used that info to provide a localized registration
form.
I think it used to redirect to a (localized) page saying something like
"Thank you for downloading
information "the webpage
> cannot be found".
>
Hi Barry,
It sounds like you are installing an old version of OpenOffice. The
current version is 3.4 and it does not have a registration screen.
You can download the latest version from
http://download.openoffice.org.
If for some rea
y the
>> webpage, or from OpenOffice welcome page - get more information "the webpage
>> cannot be found".
>>
>
> Hi Barry,
>
> It sounds like you are installing an old version of OpenOffice. The
> current version is 3.4 and it does not have a registration scr
ossible as I always get the message - Internet Explorer cannot display the
>>> webpage, or from OpenOffice welcome page - get more information "the
>>> webpage cannot be found".
>>>
>>
>> Hi Barry,
>>
>> It sounds like you are installing
;>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Barry,
>>>
>>> It sounds like you are installing an old version of OpenOffice. The
>>> current version is 3.4 and it does not have a registration screen.
>>> You can download the latest version from
>>> http:/
On 16/07/2012 21:14, sebb wrote:
On 16 July 2012 19:01, Rob Weir wrote:
The registration URL's for OOo 3.3 look like this:
https://registration2.services.openoffice.org/RegistrationWeb/register/?prduct=OpenOffice.org&locale=en&cid-926117
So we should be able to handle this enti
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 16/07/2012 21:14, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 16 July 2012 19:01, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
>>> The registration URL's for OOo 3.3 look like this:
>>>
>>> https://registration2.services.openoffic
On 23/07/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
So I'd propose to ask Infra to redirect the whole domains
https://registration2.services.openoffice.org/
http://registration2.services.openoffice.org/
http://survey.services.openoffice.org/
to something that e
Am 08/07/2012 11:44 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 23/07/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
So I'd propose to ask Infra to redirect the whole domains
https://registration2.services.openoffice.org/
http://registration2.services.openoffice.org/
http://s
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 23/07/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>
>>> So I'd propose to ask Infra to redirect the whole domains
>>> https://registration2.services.openoffice.org/
>>> http://registration2.servic
On Aug 7, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 23/07/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> So I'd propose to ask Infra to redirect the whole domains
>>> https://registration2.services.openoffice.org/
>>> http://registration2.services.openoff
Hi,
On 07.08.2012 23:44, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 23/07/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
So I'd propose to ask Infra to redirect the whole domains
https://registration2.services.openoffice.org/
http://registration2.services.openoffice.org/
http://s
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 07.08.2012 23:44, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>> On 23/07/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
So I'd propose to ask Infra to redirect the whole domains
https:
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
On 07.08.2012 23:44, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I created a page with this content at
http://www.openoffice.org/legacy/thankyou.html
May be we can use it also for our update service. It could be the
landing page for users of legacy OOo versions for whose language we do
genevieve Berthault wrote:
Hello! I would like to subscribe to this mailing list please.
All the best,
Genny
You will have to subscribe yourself. Go to
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/mailing-lists.html and click
the link.
Just so that your
Send email to: ooo-dev-subscr...@incubator.apache.org
Also, see: http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/mailing-lists.html
-Rob
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:02 AM, genevieve Berthault
wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello! I would like to subscribe to this mailing list please.
> All the best,
> Genny
Hi,
On 09.08.2012 16:23, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
Hi,
On 07.08.2012 23:44, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 23/07/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
So I'd propose to ask Infra to redirect the whol
On 09/08/2012 Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 7, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I created a page with this content at
http://www.openoffice.org/legacy/thankyou.html If we have lazy
consensus (i.e., no objections in 72 hours or so) on this, I'll
then proceed and ask Infra to redirect all lega
On Aug 14, 2012, at 8:09 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 09/08/2012 Dave Fisher wrote:
>> On Aug 7, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> I created a page with this content at
>>> http://www.openoffice.org/legacy/thankyou.html If we have lazy
>>> consensus (i.e., no objections in 72 hours
On 15/08/2012 Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 14, 2012, at 8:09 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Ready at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5144
I'll look into this one tomorrow. There will be two parts.
(1) DNS redirect to www.openoffice.org
(2) httpd.conf rewrite to redirect to thankyou.html.
With pootle up and running, how does one go about registering him/herself
on the tool?
--
Roberto Salomon
http://notaslivres.webhop.net
Will whoever set up a LinkedIn membership as "Opensource Appachee
[ooo-us...@incubator.apache.org]" please drop that account. Requests for
addition to the "professional network" of other folks are being rejected by the
moderator.
There is a different way to create groups on LinkedIn.
This
rvices.rdb"
Trace 0/1: "OStoreSuperBlockPage::verify(): double failure.
when accessing xml services rdb files. After some research, I
discovered that now UNO components have passive registration, and they
write a xml file instead of old binary format.
But in os2 port it seems that reading
The server is at translate.a.o [1] and there is a FAQ discussing auth
levels at [2]
Basically, it's setup to allow small suggestions and patches from
anyone, but to require one to be a committer to make substantial
contributions.
Andrew
(also, we are hoping in the very near future to seed this
[mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 09:17
To: ooo-users Apache Incubator List (ooo-us...@incubator.apache.org)
Cc: OOo-dev Apache Incubator (ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org)
Subject: Bogus Linked-In Registration
Will whoever set up a LinkedIn membership as "Opensource Appachee
> But in os2 port it seems that reading xml files does not work.
fixed, it was not a problem with registry.
--
Bye,
Yuri Dario
/*
* OS/2 open source software
* http://web.os2power.com/yuri
* http://www.netlabs.org
*/
Hi,
For the record, I registered #ooo-dev channel ( server :
irc.freenode.net ), and sent the password to Greg Stein.
Just in case, I either set some flags (guard, secure, topic) "on".
If this channel is really unneeded, just tell me, and I'll drop it.
Thanks,
Eric
--
qɔᴉɹə
Education Pro
registration
Hi,
For the record, I registered #ooo-dev channel ( server :
irc.freenode.net ), and sent the password to Greg Stein.
Just in case, I either set some flags (guard, secure, topic) "on".
If this channel is really unneeded, just tell me, and I'll drop it.
Thanks,
Eric
--
Hi,
In fact, the registration purpose was to protect the channel against
people not well intentionned.
That's not me who will decide to use it or not and if people prefer
use the existing #dev.openoffice.org one, that's no problem either :-)
Regards,
Eric Bachard
Le 15 juin
;
> In fact, the registration purpose was to protect the channel against people
> not well intentionned.
>
> That's not me who will decide to use it or not and if people prefer use the
> existing #dev.openoffice.org one, that's no problem either :-)
>
> Regards,
> Eri
Hi,
Le 15 juin 11 à 10:24, Greg Stein a écrit :
It's better to grab it, and not need it... than to want it and not
get it :-)
exactly :)
All good. Now we just see how the community wants to organize.
(I tend to fear using the old channel, if the TDF/LO folks are
using it for their w
Am 15.06.2011 10:24, schrieb Greg Stein:
All good. Now we just see how the community wants to organize.
I would much prefer to use the mailing lists only.
IRCs have the tendency to continuously exclude those people who are
working in a different time zone and also those that are not always on
Hi,
Le 15 juin 11 à 11:26, IngridvdM a écrit :
Am 15.06.2011 10:24, schrieb Greg Stein:
All good. Now we just see how the community wants to organize.
I would much prefer to use the mailing lists only.
IRCs have the tendency to continuously exclude those people who are
working in a differ
> I would much prefer to use the mailing lists only.
> IRCs have the tendency to continuously exclude those people who are working
> in a different time zone and also those that are not always online.
Somebody wise once said: if it didn't happen on list, it didn't
happen. (I think it was Ron Field
Am 15.06.2011 11:35, schrieb eric b:
Le 15 juin 11 à 11:26, IngridvdM a écrit :
Am 15.06.2011 10:24, schrieb Greg Stein:
All good. Now we just see how the community wants to organize.
I would much prefer to use the mailing lists only.
IRCs have the tendency to continuously exclude those peopl
Greg Stein wrote:
It's better to grab it, and not need it... than to want it and not get it :-)
All good. Now we just see how the community wants to organize.
(I tend to fear using the old channel, if the TDF/LO folks are using
it for their work)
The LO devs have their own channel #libreoff
Hi,
I have seen the "Registration..." menu entry in the "Help" menu. I tend
to remove this entry completely or at least remove it by default and
make it configurable for potential later use.
At the moment it opens a Url [1] in the browser that is not working at all.
Any
On 1/25/2012 11:49, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
I have seen the "Registration..." menu entry in the "Help" menu. I tend
to remove this entry completely or at least remove it by default and
make it configurable for potential later use.
At the moment it opens a Url [1] in the
Hi,
On 25.01.2012 17:49, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
I have seen the "Registration..." menu entry in the "Help" menu. I tend to
remove this entry completely or at least remove it by default and make it
configurable for potential later use.
At the moment it opens a Url [1] in
2012/1/25 Jürgen Schmidt :
> Hi,
>
> I have seen the "Registration..." menu entry in the "Help" menu. I tend to
> remove this entry completely or at least remove it by default and make it
> configurable for potential later use.
>
> At the moment it o
On 1/26/12 2:15 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
2012/1/25 Jürgen Schmidt:
Hi,
I have seen the "Registration..." menu entry in the "Help" menu. I tend to
remove this entry completely or at least remove it by default and make it
configurable for potential later use.
At the moment it op
2012/1/26 Jürgen Schmidt :
> On 1/26/12 2:15 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> 2012/1/25 Jürgen Schmidt:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have seen the "Registration..." menu entry in the "Help" menu. I tend
>>> to
>>> remov
On 1/26/12 2:32 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 1/26/12 2:15 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
2012/1/25 Jürgen Schmidt:
Hi,
I have seen the "Registration..." menu entry in the "Help" menu. I
tend to
remove this entry completely or at least remove it by default and
make it
configurable for
gn and Software Courses
From: Rob Weir
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: [CODE]: "Registration..." menu entry in the Help menu
2012/1/26 Jürgen Schmidt :
> On 1/26/12 2:15 PM, Rob Weir w
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> 2012/1/26 Jürgen Schmidt :
> > On 1/26/12 2:15 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> >>
> >> 2012/1/25 Jürgen Schmidt:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have seen the "Registr
: Re: [CODE]: "Registration..." menu entry in the Help menu
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
[ ... ]
> The closest to registration that we might have is to encourage the
> user to sign up for the ooo-announce list. But this is just one of
> several things we wa
> Free 24 hour pass to lynda.com.
> Video courses on SEO, CMS,
> Design and Software Courses
>
>
>
>
> From: Rob Weir
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 8:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [CODE]: "Registration.
: Re: [CODE]:
"Registration..." menu entry in the Help menu
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Rob Weir
wrote: [ ... ]
The closest to registration that we might have is to encourage the
user to sign up for the ooo-announce list. But this is just one
of several things we want to tell th
k to a web/wiki page be better for that?
This is an interesting area. I wonder how to avoid scope creep and deal with
the registration menu entry in a way that works for now and that can be
expanded into a broader "welcome/starter" link. I know some first-run
presentations tend to b
Finally, as a means for feedback, encouraging exploration and
contribution, wouldn't a link to a web/wiki page be better for that?
These are not mutually exclusive. We should have both.
This is an interesting area. I wonder how to avoid scope creep and
deal with the registration menu entry i
Hi,
On 09.08.2012 22:23, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
On 07.08.2012 23:44, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I created a page with this content at
http://www.openoffice.org/legacy/thankyou.html
May be we can use it also for our update service. It could be the
landing page for use
Hi,
Apologies to the Apache Infra team, the load caused by implementing INFRA-5112
caused trouble.
The changes to update*.services.openoffice.org to point to www.openoffice.org
was reverted.
This was due to added load on the Apache Infrastructure.
Before we can proceed with INFRA-5112 and INF
Hi,
On 15.08.2012 16:00, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi,
Apologies to the Apache Infra team, the load caused by implementing
INFRA-5112 caused trouble.
The changes to update*.services.openoffice.org to point to www.openoffice.org
was reverted.
This was due to added load on the Apache Infrastructure.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies to the Apache Infra team, the load caused by implementing
> INFRA-5112 caused trouble.
>
> The changes to update*.services.openoffice.org to point to www.openoffice.org
> was reverted.
>
> This was due to added load on the
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 15.08.2012 16:00, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Apologies to the Apache Infra team, the load caused by implementing
>> INFRA-5112 caused trouble.
>>
>> The changes to update*.services.openoffice.org to point to
>>
On Aug 15, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 15.08.2012 16:00, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Apologies to the Apache Infra team, the load caused by implementing
>>> INFRA-5112 caused trouble.
>>>
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Aug 15, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> On 15.08.2012 16:00, Dave Fisher wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Apologies to the Apache Infra
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 16:32:21 +0200:
>> Is it possible that somebody from the Apache Infrastructure can
>> provide a view on which URL the traffic load was soo high that the
>> servers got in trouble?
>>
>
> PO
Rob Weir wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 13:11:43 -0400:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 16:32:21 +0200:
> >> Is it possible that somebody from the Apache Infrastructure can
> >> provide a view on which URL the traff
On Aug 15, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 13:11:43 -0400:
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 16:32:21 +0200:
Is it possible that somebody from the Apache Infr
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Aug 15, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
>> Rob Weir wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 13:11:43 -0400:
>>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>>> wrote:
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 16:32:21
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Dave Fisher
> wrote:
> >
> > On Aug 15, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >
> >> Rob Weir wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 13:11:43 -0400:
> >>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> >>
On Aug 15, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Dave Fisher
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 15, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>>
Rob Weir wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 13:11:43 -0400:
> On W
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Aug 15, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Dave Fisher
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Aug 15, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >>>
>
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 15, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Dave Fisher
>> >> wrote:
>> >
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Dave Fisher
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Aug 15, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> >
>> >> Rob Weir wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 13:11:43 -0400:
>> >>>
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Dave Fisher
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Aug 15, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >> >
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Dave Fisher
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >
On Aug 15, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2
Hi Daniel,
On 15.08.2012 19:28, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Rob Weir wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 13:11:43 -0400:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 16:32:21 +0200:
Is it possible that somebody from the Apache Infrastructure c
Hi
On 15.08.2012 19:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 16:32:21 +0200:
Is it possible that somebody from the Apache Infrastructure can
provide a view on which URL the traffic load was soo high that the
servers got in trouble?
POST requests to /Produ
Hi,
On 16.08.2012 14:42, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi
On 15.08.2012 19:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 16:32:21 +0200:
Is it possible that somebody from the Apache Infrastructure can
provide a view on which URL the traffic load was soo high th
On 08/17/2012 03:55 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 16.08.2012 14:42, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi
On 15.08.2012 19:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 16:32:21 +0200:
Is it possible that somebody from the Apache Infrastructure can
pro
85 matches
Mail list logo
