The kqemu module itself is IP of Fabrice Bellard.
Not sure if I can integrate it into the pkgs,
probably NOT.
Thanks for the clarification. I understand the IP situation and won't have any
problem downloading kqemu as a separate package.
The wrapper module will continue to be available
Peter Tribble wrote:
On 1/1/07, wb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a /tmp FS for swap, and a really big file crout*
inside. The /tmp was 95% up.
I decided to remove the crout file.
The problem, is the /tmp is not decreasing, but still
growing.
How could I make it decrease?
when i try using acctcom in my solaris 10 machine, it gives out the foll error
essage : acctcom: cannot open /var/adm/pacct
Am kind of new to the environment so am not able to trace out the problem...
Can anyone help me out with this???
thanks and Regards,
Arun DK
This message posted from
Hi,
While building the dynamic linker using dmake all, the build process failed
because of libc_pic.a
library not found in /usr/lib/pics.
Build the full workspace, then build the dynamic linker updates.
There are some parts in the ON workspace which depend on other bits being
build first.
Roland Mainz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somehow I am wondering why Solaris doesn't ship lsof in /usr/sbin/ ...
is this just noone had time yet or something else ?
Wasn't there a blog where someone explained why lsof is a perfornance pig
and should be avoided in favor of other tools?
Jörg
--
Peter C. Norton wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:59:55AM +0100, Martin Bochnig wrote:
So how would you be able to bypass any nameservice defined in
nsswitch.conf, getting those user_attr attributes in a
nameservice-independent way?
I mean, either you get it locally (files), or you may get it
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Peter C. Norton wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:59:55AM +0100, Martin Bochnig wrote:
So how would you be able to bypass any nameservice defined in
nsswitch.conf, getting those user_attr attributes in a
nameservice-independent way?
I mean, either you get it
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Maybe getuserattr() or getauthattr() ?
Plus getpublickey()
Or don't those work with files as NS ??
/etc/publickey works just fine with files.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Roland Mainz wrote:
Hi!
Is there a nameservice-independent way to obtain the values for
user_attr and publickey from a shell script (if not I would propose
to add a extension to getent) ?
publickey no there isn't.
For user_attr it depends which values you want.
user_attr is a little
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Roland Mainz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somehow I am wondering why Solaris doesn't ship lsof in /usr/sbin/ ...
is this just noone had time yet or something else ?
Wasn't there a blog where someone explained why lsof is a perfornance pig
and should be avoided in
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Martin Bochnig wrote:
[ ... ]
What I had seen is, that you apparently have to rebuild it for Solaris10
06/06, versions built for older releases don't work correctly under
06/06 anymore.
But that's certainly not a reason, why SUNW couldn't ship it.
Well, so what exactly
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 11:59:27AM +, Frank Hofmann wrote:
On the other hand, the request for lsof in Solaris is anything but new,
and the reference to pfiles, the mentioning that lsof does nasty digging
in the kernel's intestines as a reply is neither, and the arguments that
the output
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 11:59:27AM +, Frank Hofmann wrote:
On the other hand, the request for lsof in Solaris is anything but new,
and the reference to pfiles, the mentioning that lsof does nasty digging
in the kernel's intestines as a reply is
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
The kqemu module itself is IP of Fabrice Bellard.
Not sure if I can integrate it into the pkgs,
probably NOT.
Thanks for the clarification. I understand the IP situation and won't have
any problem downloading kqemu as a separate package.
The wrapper module will
Martin Bochnig wrote:
soon
(Sorry for cross-posting, but too many people are waiting for one or
another thing.)
Merging several small and bigger diffs into the CVS was not so much of a
problem.
But they at qemu (i.e. Thiemo Seufer) have professionally reimplemented
DMA support into
qemu_cvs20070102tue__solaris__MB.gdiff.bz2
Description: application/bzip
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No; it's something that we won't ship, ever because of the
nature how lsof trawls for its events.
That's not true.
Though there are folks around who have expressed the never opinion,
that does not represent the opinion of all of Solaris development.
Our group has
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No; it's something that we won't ship, ever because of the
nature how lsof trawls for its events.
That's not true.
+1 for a project to integrate the lsof command line interface. Design
and implementation to be determined. ;-}
Strange as it may seem, this is pretty
Second, when we criticize Firefox, we should perhaps
also mention the version number. The 1.5s are dogs.
Firefox 2.0 is now included in 54+.
If snv_54 is the one that integrated Vermillion, then that's the Firefox I've
in the meantime learned to *love to hate*.
It's a really crappy
Later this year (Q2/Q3 2007) anyone (users of
Solaris 10++ [sparc and
x86/64]) will additionally have the alternative to
use the then
available MRTX packages, including MRTXseamonkey.
Do you plan to deliver MRTXseamonkey in /opt/mrtx resp. /etc/opt/mrtx and
/var/opt/mrtx (for config and
The MRTX pkgs will.
However, marTux itself will be rpm based while
offering pkgadd
compatibility at the same time.
I believe that your time reengineering / repackaging software in RPM would be
better spent formally extending `pkgadd` and friends with features that `rpm`
has and `pkgadd`
Huh ? Thats that the automounter is for!
Exactly.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
UNIX admin wrote:
Otherwise, you run the risk of never being a suitable candidate for production
environments, like banks, insurance companies, industrial corporations, the
military, government, etcetera: you simply won't have enough compatibility
with stock Solaris and will diverge too far
UNIX admin wrote:
The MRTX pkgs will.
However, marTux itself will be rpm based while
offering pkgadd
compatibility at the same time.
I believe that your time reengineering / repackaging software in RPM would be
better spent formally extending `pkgadd` and friends with features that `rpm`
has
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Okay, he is partially right: First you have more mount points when
staying SVR4 compliant with config dirs here and there.
Second, the nfs client may not have /etc/opt/csw or /etc/opt/mrtx yet,
and you need to mkdir them
On 1/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Tribble wrote:
On 1/1/07, wb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a /tmp FS for swap, and a really big file crout*
inside. The /tmp was 95% up.
I decided to remove the crout file.
The problem, is the /tmp is not decreasing, but
On 1/5/07, Frank Hofmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Martin Bochnig wrote:
I think Sun has to overcome both not invented here and the instinctive
reject via not perfect, therefore not 'good enough' no matter what the
users say, before lsof goes into mainstream Solaris.
If
On 12/30/06, Boyd Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/12/2006, at 5:08 AM, Josh Hurst wrote:
How can I boot (Open)Solaris into the Trusted Solaris mode?
Josh
It's not as simple as booting into Trusted Solaris mode. You need
to install and configure the Trusted Extensions.
There is ample
On 1/5/07, Rich Teer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Note that lsof doesn't have to do kmem craling. For example on Linux
it only uses proper procfs interfaces. As such proper interfaces seem
to exist on Solaris as well for use with pfiles it shouldn't
Josh Hurst wrote:
On 1/5/07, Frank Hofmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Martin Bochnig wrote:
I think Sun has to overcome both not invented here and the instinctive
reject via not perfect, therefore not 'good enough' no matter what the
users say, before lsof goes into mainstream
On 1/5/07, Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
The MRTX pkgs will.
However, marTux itself will be rpm based while
offering pkgadd
compatibility at the same time.
I believe that your time reengineering / repackaging software in RPM would be
better spent formally
Josh Hurst writes:
On 1/5/07, Frank Hofmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Martin Bochnig wrote:
I think Sun has to overcome both not invented here and the instinctive
reject via not perfect, therefore not 'good enough' no matter what the
users say, before lsof goes into
Josh Hurst writes:
On 12/30/06, Boyd Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is ample documentation here: http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/coll/
175.9
Why are the Trusted Extension packages not installed by default? I
selected 'Full Install' during installation and the installer did not
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Josh Hurst wrote:
Vic's name is spelled 'Abell', two e-
Whoops, my bad! Sorry Vic (I thought something didn't look quite
right when I wrote that post)...
--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
. *
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
On 1/5/07, Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
The MRTX pkgs will.
However, marTux itself will be rpm based while
offering pkgadd
compatibility at the same time.
I believe that your time reengineering / repackaging software in RPM
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Okay so you have 3 mounts instead of 1.
That is 3 lines in one automount map in the nameservice - big deal.
Solaris unlike some other systems really doesn't have a problem
scaling to thousands of client side mounts -
the UI is
quite different don't help Firefox's case either.
You need to go into about:config to change the UIs to suit your taste (e.g.,
the way tabs are closed, etc.)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:59:55AM +0100, Martin Bochnig wrote:
So how would you be able to bypass any nameservice defined in
nsswitch.conf, getting those user_attr attributes in a
nameservice-independent way?
I mean, either you get it locally (files), or you may get it via one of
the
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:25:30PM +0100, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Peter C. Norton wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:59:55AM +0100, Martin Bochnig wrote:
So how would you be able to bypass any nameservice defined in
nsswitch.conf, getting those user_attr attributes in a
Josh Hurst wrote:
On 12/30/06, Boyd Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/12/2006, at 5:08 AM, Josh Hurst wrote:
How can I boot (Open)Solaris into the Trusted Solaris mode?
Josh
It's not as simple as booting into Trusted Solaris mode. You need
to install and configure the Trusted
Josh Hurst wrote:
On 12/30/06, Boyd Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/12/2006, at 5:08 AM, Josh Hurst wrote:
How can I boot (Open)Solaris into the Trusted Solaris mode?
Josh
It's not as simple as booting into Trusted Solaris mode. You need
to install and configure the Trusted
(cc'ing install-discuss)
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 16:15 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
exactly which needed features are those that rpm has that pkgadd does
not ?
One feature that's missing, and would be infinitely useful for
online package repositories, is = style version checking in
My biggest gripe with Blastwave is that they are not
System V compliant.
Dennis says this is because they wanted everything
in one place. I fail to see how NFS-mounting
/etc/opt/csw from another server would have been a
problem, but OK.
I like the way Blastwave.org is structured as I can
On 1/5/07, Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
On 1/5/07, Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
The MRTX pkgs will.
However, marTux itself will be rpm based while
offering pkgadd
compatibility at the same time.
I believe that
I was playing around with upcoming.org today, yahoo's web 2.0
social bookmarks style global upcoming events calendar and
noticed there were no events tagged opensolaris, so I entered two
of them, just to see what happens:
http://upcoming.org/tag/opensolaris/
It might be an interesting place
No; it's something that we won't ship, ever because of the
nature how lsof trawls for its events.
You could send patches to fix lsfo if you do not like it's implementation :)
You could check the source code and look for my name there.
While I understand James' aversion against my comments, I
Why are the Trusted Extension packages not installed by default? I
selected 'Full Install' during installation and the installer did not
install these packages
Because the system then becomes a Trusted System and behaves differently
(no ordinary zones, for one)
Casper
exactly which needed features are those that rpm has
that pkgadd does not ?
That's really for Martin and not for me to say, since he seems to be the one
preferring `rpm` to `pkgadd` and friends.
But since you're asking me, I'll tell you what I plan to do to `pkgadd`. I plan
to extend it such
Laszlo (Laca) Peter writes:
(cc'ing install-discuss)
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 16:15 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
exactly which needed features are those that rpm has that pkgadd does
not ?
One feature that's missing, and would be infinitely useful for
online package repositories, is =
Peter C. Norton writes:
I think he wants to be able to add a flag, i.e. -nssvc nis, -nssvc
dns, -nssvc 'ldap', etc. to getent that will dlopen the appropriate
nss_blah library instead of following the lookup in nsswitch.conf so
that the lookup to a particular database can be scripted.
Better
On 1/5/07, Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just because /bin/sh isn't your shell of choice doesn't make it crappy.
Really?
Take 1:
/bin/sh /dev/urandom
Illegal Instruction (core dumped)
Take 2-29:
cat /var/adm/messages* | grep -F core.sh | sort
Dec 10 11:09:41 fido genunix: [ID
exactly which needed features are those that rpm has
that pkgadd does not ?
Third thing that I find ingenious in both `inst` and `swinstall` on HP-UX is
hierarchical namespaces: on both IRIX and HP-UX one is able to package software
hierarchichally, for example
(on IRIX:)
eoe.sw.bind -
I like the way Blastwave.org is structured as I can
mount everything in a separate partition to be shared
by multiple Solaris installations. The installations
can be subsequently upgraded, but /opt/csw stays
there. No need to re-install those packages. Coming
from Linux background, this
In the current implementation for Solaris it pokes
around in kernel
memory and it has no business doing so, it can and
will break.
Right; according to the author of `lsof` himself, `lsof` peeks into private
Solaris kernel structs and is likely to crash if those are changed. This is
what
Really?
Take 1:
/bin/sh /dev/urandom
Illegal Instruction (core dumped)
Take 2-29:
cat /var/adm/messages* | grep -F core.sh | sort
You can take takes 'till the cows come home, but the day Solaris breaks
backward compatibility is the day Solaris will become crap, just like some
other
On 1/5/07, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
exactly which needed features are those that rpm has
that pkgadd does not ?
...
There are principally several major features `pkgadd` is lacking, and
those are:
if I need REV 1.0 or 2007.01.05.07 of some dependency,
and I have REV 3.2 or
exactly which needed features are those that rpm has
that pkgadd does not ?
The one that I would like to see implemented (I need more time...) is
that when I go
pkgadd pkg1 pkg2
and pkg1 depends on pkg2 it is smart enough to automatically install
pkg2 first followed by pkg1. Ditto pkgrm.
Hi,
following the document on Solaris NDIS Wrapper Toolkit
(http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/laptop/wireless/ndis/), I'm trying to
build the driver on my DELL 1501 (equipped with an AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-56 and a
mini WLAN Dual Band wireless DELL 1490) with Solaris 10 06/11, but without
On 1/5/07, Charles Hedrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm an experience Solaris sysadmin, but I haven't used a current version
on the desktop. I'm trying to figure out what software to use.
I've tried nextenta. It works pretty well, but I really want Solaris, not
Linux on a Solaris kernel.
The
Peter Tribble writes:
pkgadd pkg1 pkg2
Dependency ordering is already present for patchadd. There are many
bugs on this for the pkg* tools:
RFE 1105830 is the granddaddy of them and requests ordering
RFE 1145132 requests pkgadd to prompt for and install dependencies
RFE 1249489 is a
I'm an experience Solaris sysadmin, but I haven't used a current version on
the desktop. I'm trying to figure out what software to use.
The best option seemed to be Solaris Express. However it doesn't seem to be
a complete enviornment. I've used packages from Sun Freeware with it without
UNIX admin wrote:
if I need REV 1.0 or 2007.01.05.07 of some dependency,
and I have REV 3.2 or 2007.04.18.23 of the said software,
`pkgadd` should be able to recognize that I have satisfied the min REV
required, and plough on instead of doing a string-like check and *insisting*
that I need
UNIX admin wrote:
`lsof` peeks into private Solaris kernel structs and is likely
to crash if those are changed.
So my hair stands up on my head when I sit in management meetings
and one of my collagues whines why we can't have `lsof` integrated
in our internal build of Solaris... absolutely
Hello Dennis,
Friday, January 5, 2007, 11:25:45 PM, you wrote:
I see that Blastwave doesn't support Solaris Express, so that looks like
an unsafe source.
DC No one supports Solaris Express. Not even Sun. I think what you mean is
DC that the software is fully expected to run just fine.
Hello Charles,
Friday, January 5, 2007, 10:12:57 PM, you wrote:
Generally Blastwave should and does work on SX.
There's already gcc included in Solaris (and SX) - however there's no
gdb (yet). Eventually go with gcc from Blastwave - works fine.
Additionally you may want to try Sun Studio 11 as
So has this bug been fixed yet ?
Rgds
Robin
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
The best option seemed to be Solaris Express. However
it doesn't seem to be a complete enviornment. I've
used packages from Sun Freeware with it without
problems. But a few things I want aren't there. I had
hoped to use Blastwave, but when I loaded Scribus
from there, it messed things up
---
with a lot of messages in the /var/adm/messages file
(see below for a little extract)
--
---
Jan 5 20:41:43 d1501 genunix: [ID 387338
kern.notice] symbol
Hello Dennis,
Friday, January 5, 2007, 11:25:45 PM, you wrote:
I see that Blastwave doesn't support Solaris Express, so that looks like
an unsafe source.
DC No one supports Solaris Express. Not even Sun. I think what you
mean is
DC that the software is fully expected to run just
Hello Charles,
Friday, January 5, 2007, 10:12:57 PM, you wrote:
Generally Blastwave should and does work on SX.
There's already gcc included in Solaris (and SX) - however there's no
gdb (yet). Eventually go with gcc from Blastwave - works fine.
Additionally you may want to try Sun
Hello Dennis,
Saturday, January 6, 2007, 2:45:32 AM, you wrote:
Hello Charles,
Friday, January 5, 2007, 10:12:57 PM, you wrote:
Generally Blastwave should and does work on SX.
There's already gcc included in Solaris (and SX) - however there's no
gdb (yet). Eventually go with gcc from
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:34:27PM -0800, John Plocher wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
if I need REV 1.0 or 2007.01.05.07 of some dependency,
and I have REV 3.2 or 2007.04.18.23 of the said software,
`pkgadd` should be able to recognize that I have satisfied the min REV
required, and plough on
Generally Blastwave should and does work on SX.
There's already gcc included in Solaris (and SX) - however there's no
gdb (yet). Eventually go with gcc from Blastwave - works fine.
Additionally you may want to try Sun Studio 11 as Denis pointed out -
it's free and with SXCR 55 (which
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Peter C. Norton wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:59:55AM +0100, Martin Bochnig wrote:
[snip]
How does nisinit get names from dns even if your system is set to
resolve via NIS+?
Maybe you mean, Roland would want to clone the methods in which
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
[snip]
Normal users with limited privileges may naturally have no - or
limited - access.
Didn't you find any help in the man pages for NIS, NIS+ and LDAP?
That was not the goal. The matching scripts should be able to operate
regardless how the backend
James Carlson wrote:
Peter C. Norton writes:
I think he wants to be able to add a flag, i.e. -nssvc nis, -nssvc
dns, -nssvc 'ldap', etc. to getent that will dlopen the appropriate
nss_blah library instead of following the lookup in nsswitch.conf so
that the lookup to a particular database
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Is there a nameservice-independent way to obtain the values for
user_attr and publickey from a shell script (if not I would propose
to add a extension to getent) ?
publickey no there isn't.
For user_attr it depends which values you want.
I
I too would like to see getent extended to handle everything in nsswitch.conf
for which the results would be useful, a get*() function exists, and the
extension would be reasonably straightforward.
I didn't see anything in SUSv3 about getent, so if there's anything that
would forbid adding
78 matches
Mail list logo
