Most notebooks do this through soft keys, check your
keyboard. Ether
that, or it's running in a low power mode.
My notebook has the softkeys, but they don't work under the solaris os only.
And whether it's running in a low power mode seems not important at all.
Anyone has the same
/bin/sh is something different, it is not a Korn Shell but a Bourne S=
hell.
And it cannoit really be made compatible without breaking ksh.
(And while we can fix our scripts to work fine with ksh/ksh93,
customer scripts breakage will be different)
Casper
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 4, 2008 11:40 AM, Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If someone at Sun is interested to take the current code, he is welcome!
I am currently working on fixing bugs in sh and making it portable
Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neither Linux nor WinXP/Vista write UFS or ZFS.
WinXP/Vista does not support to read Rock Ridge at all
Linux does not support hard links with Rock Ridge
The only choice you have is Solaris ;-)
Actually, there is a Windows Resource kit for
Derek Cicero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This link:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/
seems to have disappeared since the dlc came back up. We're looking into it.
We now have the state from December 4th. Do you know where to get the last two
months from?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL
Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which brings us to Solaris. Can Solaris provide integrated, cohesive
kernel and true unix userland in a stable and well performing package
that is freely available, and hence able to compete on it's own
technical merits with the freely available *BSD's
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I wish that there were better options than GNU userland in terms
of functionality, the reality is that the majority of the open source
world has chosen the GNU toolset, for better or worse, as their
toolset of choice.
There is of course a better
Derek Cicero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This link:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/
seems to have disappeared since the dlc came back
up. We're looking into it.
We now have the state from December 4th. Do you know
where to get the last two
months from?
Jörg
I'm
div id=jive-html-wrapper-div
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 13:33 +, Chris Linton-Ford
wrote:
BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE
PRE
FONT COLOR=#00On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 08:21
-0800, Mike DeMarco wrote:/FONT
FONT COLOR=#00 Have you tried to do a
/FONT
FONT COLOR=#00 zpool scrub ?/FONT
FONT
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Derek Cicero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This link:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/
seems to have disappeared since the dlc came back up. We're looking into it.
We now have the state from December 4th. Do you know where to get the
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling writes:
I am in fear that Solaris cannot
In the past years, Solaris stability rules have not been followed as usual
and
it seems this has been done because of lack of payed time inside Sun.
Please stop passing around FUD.
On Feb 5, 2008 4:20 PM, Al Hopper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question: Anyone got a copy of in-test-199.iso that I can mirror on
genunix.org? [the in-test-199.iso.torrent link is MIA and I'd rather
just get a copy of the iso file than mess with bittorrent]
I've downloaded mine from
On Feb 5, 2008 8:31 AM, Kyle McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For instance, I understand that in the linux world 'DBUS' and 'HAL' have
come from the same (or closely connected) community that GNOME comes
from. So I don't see a problem with the GNOME team at sun being
responsible for
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 4:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/bin/sh is something different, it is not a Korn Shell but a Bourne S=
hell.
And it cannoit really be made compatible without breaking ksh.
(And while we can fix our scripts to work fine with
It just so happens that GNU/Linux is one of those
platforms from which
certain evaluations are drawn.
Yeah well, I can tell you that it would have been much more useful to draw from
operating systems which got things right, like HP-UX, and IRIX in particular!
Even FreeBSD has features that
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:49:04 -0600
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 4, 2008 7:30 PM, Ken Gunderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:27:41 -0600
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008 12:14 PM, Ken Gunderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 03
On Feb 5, 2008 8:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 4:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/bin/sh is something different, it is not a Korn Shell but a Bourne S=
hell.
And it cannoit really be made compatible without breaking ksh.
(And while we can fix our scripts to work
On Feb 5, 2008 6:15 AM, Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I wish that there were better options than GNU userland in terms
of functionality, the reality is that the majority of the open source
world has chosen the GNU toolset, for better
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a plan to create complatibility to /bin/ksh which is based on
ksh88.
/bin/sh is something different, it is not a Korn Shell but a Bourne Shell.
I know that; but the version we have is also very limited.
I know Roland believes that ksh93
Joerg Schilling wrote:
I still cannot understand why a Sun controlled login (via PAM) depends on
Mozilla's /usr/lib/mps/libssl3.so but /usr/sbin/pkgadd depends on
/usr/sfw/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8
This is the problem I'm more concerned about than including the 'Linux
Suite' of software.
On Feb 5, 2008 4:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/bin/sh is something different, it is not a Korn Shell but a Bourne S=
hell.
And it cannoit really be made compatible without breaking ksh.
(And while we can fix our scripts to work fine with ksh/ksh93,
customer scripts breakage will be
On Feb 5, 2008 4:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/bin/sh is something different, it is not a Korn Shell but a Bourne S=
hell.
And it cannoit really be made compatible without breaking ksh.
(And while we can fix our scripts to work fine with ksh/ksh93,
customer scripts breakage will be
Kyle McDonald wrote:
Another example, is Xscreensaver. I always used to be able install that
with only X11 installed. Now not only does GNOME have to be installed
too, So does large portions of Evolution!! What on earth does Evolution
have to do with a ScreenSaver?
In order to support
I'd be very surprised if someone rewrote history to
declare Indiana
the cause of the first OpenSolaris fork, given that
we've already
got Nexenta, Schillix, Belenix and Martux.
Those aren't forks, since they sync up with the main OpenSolaris codebase on a
regular basis.
A fork is a
Shawn Walker wrote:
[...]
But when the program that manages automatically mounting removable media
was integrated and required these API's, libraries, and daemons, I think
it should have been obvious to move them to some other more 'system
level' package and not allowed to stay in large GNOME
Al,
[Snip!]
[the in-test-199.iso.torrent link is MIA and I'd rather
just get a copy of the iso file than mess with bittorrent]
+1 - I don't think that anyone in their right mind would prefer a Torrent-based
acquisition method for our ISO's...
Regards... Sean.
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
Another example, is Xscreensaver. I always used to be able install that
with only X11 installed. Now not only does GNOME have to be installed
too, So does large portions of Evolution!! What on earth does Evolution
have to do with a ScreenSaver?
Again, that's a
On Feb 5, 2008 9:37 AM, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be very surprised if someone rewrote history to
declare Indiana
the cause of the first OpenSolaris fork, given that
we've already
got Nexenta, Schillix, Belenix and Martux.
Those aren't forks, since they sync up with the
On Feb 5, 2008 9:42 AM, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It just so happens that GNU/Linux is one of those
platforms from which
certain evaluations are drawn.
Yeah well, I can tell you that it would have been much more useful to draw
from operating systems which got things right, like
On Feb 5, 2008 10:41 AM, Sean Sprague [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Al,
[Snip!]
[the in-test-199.iso.torrent link is MIA and I'd rather
just get a copy of the iso file than mess with bittorrent]
+1 - I don't think that anyone in their right mind would prefer a
Torrent-based acquisition
Kyle McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For instance, I understand that in the linux world 'DBUS' and 'HAL' have
come from the same (or closely connected) community that GNOME comes
from. So I don't see a problem with the GNOME team at sun being
responsible for integrating them into
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 8:31 AM, Kyle McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For instance, I understand that in the linux world 'DBUS' and 'HAL' have
come from the same (or closely connected) community that GNOME comes
from. So I don't see a problem with the GNOME
On Feb 5, 2008 11:42 AM, Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 8:31 AM, Kyle McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For instance, I understand that in the linux world 'DBUS' and 'HAL' have
come from the same (or closely connected)
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is of course a better choice: foster the UNIX tools instead of merely
leaving them alone for more than 10 years.
The past cannot be changed Joerg. Arguing about the past is fruitless.
If you like to define the future, you cannot ignore the past.
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Good question, but I don't know. The problem I see with Xscreensaver is that
it is installed suid root on SXCE and thus is unable to read ~/.Xauthority
from NFS mounted home directories. Removing the suid root did fix the problem
for me.
And broke the ability for it to
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:08:02 -0600
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 9:37 AM, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be very surprised if someone rewrote history to
declare Indiana
the cause of the first OpenSolaris fork, given that
we've already
got Nexenta,
* Sean Sprague [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-05 16:41]:
Al,
[Snip!]
[the in-test-199.iso.torrent link is MIA and I'd rather
just get a copy of the iso file than mess with bittorrent]
+1 - I don't think that anyone in their right mind would prefer a
Torrent-based acquisition method for
On Feb 5, 2008 12:26 PM, Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:08:02 -0600
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 9:37 AM, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be very surprised if someone rewrote history to
declare Indiana
the cause of the
Hello!
Finally, I managed to free some laptop for UX. I
would like to install
Solaris and Linux (Slackware) as dual boot. Laptop
comes with 120 GB
disk. I need some advice on the partition scheme. I
have this so far:
Solaris: 15GB boot
4GB swap
15GB
On Feb 5, 2008 12:49 PM, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 12:44 -0600, Shawn Walker wrote:
Thus, I stand by the claim that Nexenta, at the very least, is a fork.
You deeply mistaken here. As far as OpenSolaris is concerned - Nexenta
is NOT a fork. We share the
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:08:40 -0600
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 9:42 AM, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It just so happens that GNU/Linux is one of those
platforms from which
certain evaluations are drawn.
Yeah well, I can tell you that it would have been
On Feb 5, 2008 1:21 PM, Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:08:40 -0600
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 9:42 AM, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It just so happens that GNU/Linux is one of those
platforms from which
certain
On Feb 5, 2008 1:14 PM, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 13:08 -0600, Shawn Walker wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 12:49 PM, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 12:44 -0600, Shawn Walker wrote:
Thus, I stand by the claim that Nexenta, at the
On Feb 5, 2008 1:27 PM, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 13:26 -0600, Shawn Walker wrote:
...and I never said that wasn't a good thing. I'm just pointing out
that Nexenta is different.
in a good, practical and positive way... :-)
That I will whole-heartedly
Al Hopper wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Derek Cicero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This link:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/
seems to have disappeared since the dlc came back up. We're looking into it.
We now have the state from December 4th. Do you know
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 13:08 -0600, Shawn Walker wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 12:49 PM, Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 12:44 -0600, Shawn Walker wrote:
Thus, I stand by the claim that Nexenta, at the very least, is a fork.
You deeply mistaken here. As far as
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Kyle McDonald wrote:
Another example, is Xscreensaver. I always used to be able install
that with only X11 installed. Now not only does GNOME have to be
installed too, So does large portions of Evolution!! What on earth
does Evolution have to do with a ScreenSaver?
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Stephen Hahn wrote:
If you're watching any of the project aliases, you'll have seen a
flurry of bugfixes go by in the past week or two. The various
project teams have been making the various, coordinated corrections
needed to assemble a second preview release of
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 13:26 -0600, Shawn Walker wrote:
...and I never said that wasn't a good thing. I'm just pointing out
that Nexenta is different.
in a good, practical and positive way... :-)
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
BTW on a side note I just checked the dependencies here. SUNWhal and
SUNWrmvolmgr depend on SUNWgnome-base-libs.
SUNWgnome-base-libs != GNOME.
Then why does it say 'gnome' in the name? How would someone new to
Solaris know that it wasn't part of gnome? Why wouldn't
Shawn,
As was noted in the release announcement, the test image was released
via torrent only on purpose.
Ahh... missed that one. Apols.
When the actualy preview2 image is posted, there will be other methods
to get it available.
Cool. Many thanks for the clarification.
Regards...
On Feb 4, 2008 7:30 PM, Ken Gunderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Linux = GPL license. Linux kernel bundled into
assorted distros with
various GNU tools (Gnu's Not Unix, proclaimed loud
and proud on their
homepage) and disparate userlands, etc., the
components of which are
far
It is a T2000 server with 8 cores. T1 processor does good for the system
running process with multithreads. It seems to me that it can handle 1.5*number
of core=1.5*8=12 processes with single thread. Is this formula correct for T1
processor?
perl -e 'while (--$ARGV[0] and fork) {}; while ()
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:56:22 PST
Tom Keiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 4, 2008 7:30 PM, Ken Gunderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Linux = GPL license. Linux kernel bundled into
assorted distros with
various GNU tools (Gnu's Not Unix, proclaimed loud
and proud on their
... snip ...
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/indiana/downloads/current/in-test-199.iso.torrent
... snip
Now available at http://www.genunix.org
Clarification: the ISO image is available at http://www.genunix.org
Regards,
Al
___
opensolaris-discuss
It looks like:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/
Has been restored, but I am still waiting for official notification that
it's completely in sync.
Derek
--
Derek Cicero
Program Manager
Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division
___
While trying to investigate one problem[1] I ran into another. Seemingly
unrelated in every way other than the OS rev.
titan pcn: [ID 298640 kern.info] NOTICE: pcn: rx ring broken?
This machine is 32-bit and not at all modern. It has AMD PCNet ethernet NICs
which seem to always get the very
57 matches
Mail list logo
