On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Arun Tomar wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I've a zfs box for storage and gigabit network. the max data transfer
> speed that i could get is may be between 100-125 mbps need to check
> that.
>
> I wanted to achieve close to 300mbps of data transfer speed.
>
> I remembered t
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Arun Tomar wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I really love zfs.
>
> What i want to do is to create a zfs based storage solution say 15 TB
> from commodity hardware.
>
> What I have:
> software: opensolaris 0906, belenix and solaris 10.
>
> hardware: 2 normal machines == core2
Hi all,
FYI there are two Python IPC extension modules available that you might find
useful. They're both less fancy than the multiprocessing module because they
expose lower level primitives.
There's a module for POSIX IPC:
http://semanchuk.com/philip/posix_ipc/
And another fo
Steve,
thank you for the advise!
I resolved the problem. I had language setting in /etc/default/init:
LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8
I changed it to
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
after that everything works fine.
Philip
Steve wrote:
Philip Torchinsky wrote:
I successfully configured ftp service on OpenSolaris
I successfully configured ftp service on OpenSolaris (snv_111b x86). It runs,
I can connect to an ftp server, and if I connect with command-line ftp client,
everything works fine. However, if I connect with browser using URL
ftp://u...@my.ftp.server ftp server does not show me directory conten
Postfix package is available from the repository of blastwave:
pkg set-publisher -O http://blastwave.network.com:1 blastwave
pkg install IPSpostfix
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@
/)?
There is a question from one guy at developers.sun.ru forum about
possibility to use the technology.
Philip
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Stefan,
yes, this is close to what I am looking for, but I try to read this
deeply. Thank you for the link, I lost it a year ago!
If anybody has more links to point me on, please, let me know!
Philip
Stefan Varga:
>
>>
>> I can find data spread across many books and paper
Jim,
yes, you are right - it's what I usually do :) Let's hope to find more
articles - Max is widely known as Solaris very deep diver; I need the
view from other side as well...
Thank you!
Philip
Jim Grisanzio:
> Philip Torchinsky wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Many
start for those who
would like to make their own research. I am looking for the result of
the research, because it seems to be a big amount of work, and just
repeating it may be huge time wasting...
Philip
Jan Friedel :
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 02:18:44PM +0400, Philip Torchinsky wr
X examples would be benefit as well)?
I can find data spread across many books and papers (like Solaris
Internals for Solaris and some unknown to me yet for Linux and FreeBSD)
but I believe there can be a paper with all the info gathered and
analyzed already. Can you advise me one?
Philip
$ pfexec pkgadd -d . SUNWmcon
$ pfexec pkgadd -d . SUNWmcos
$ pfexec pkgadd -d . SUNWmcosx
Thank you!
Philip
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> This isn't good. Hopefully Dennis will drop a comment
> our way soon.
>
> It'll be a sad day for everyone if blastwave closes
> permanently.
Dennis has apparently indicated, that he is no longer interested in 'hosting'
the CSW packaging efforts for solaris, if he cannot dictate various things
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6521472
according to the above link zfs install is not possible at this stage and the
last update on this was the 25th Oct.
ian, thanks for flag days link, it's helping me peel another layer of
onionSolaris rather than just making me cry. =)
Thi
will this have zfs boot & install to zfs root?
thanks
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello,
Just looking for a high level response on xVm and it's performance.
With OpenSolaris now being able to run Windows as a host what is the
performance like. I ask, as I do not have the required (core2duo) chip to test
myself.
I happily run OpenSolaris for 95% of me needs but need Windows
Neither the Sun Java web server version nor the Apache version of RSA's web
agent client (5.3) seems to work under Solaris 10 08/07. Both versions 5.2 and
5.3 of the Sun Java web server RSA webagent work on a pre-08/07 kernel, however.
Under 08/07, both agents work from the command line (acetes
I have xp on a slave drive and found I had to put the map directive in
/boot/grub/menu.lst ala
#-- EDITED BY USER - OK TO EDIT --
title Windows XP
rootnoverify (hd1,0)
map (hd0) (hd1)
map (hd1) (hd0)
chainloader +1
#-END BOOTADM
This mes
solaris 10 failing on vista business, T60 2623p3u model number, created the iso
image i'm ok upto the installing part, then i get this message no disk found ,
i have created partition with 20 gig, ntfs and FAT. well the this message
disk error, this is really frustrating, anyone please HELP!
has there been any movement on this in the last 11 months.
thanks
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 08:14:58PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ...
> Yes; the install program should make more sense out of the keyboard
> input; it doesn't do so now. Even with terminal properly set, it can't
> use Fx keys on anything other than a Sun type terminal (not xterm,
> usually)
e
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 02:50:12PM -0400, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
>
> > Even the file itself describes itself to the user as,
> >
> > Dthello*string: Welcome to the GNOME Desktop Environment
>
> This file has been in use (under changeable names) since GNOME 1.4,
> 5 years ago, so it w
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 12:01:00AM -0400, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
>
> Some default X resources are set in /usr/dt/config/Xinitrc.jds.
> These ones seem to be related to dtterm:
>
> *XmText*background: seashell
> *XmTextField*background: seashell
> *background:#AE00B200C300
Hmm. This sound
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 01:01:20PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
> Dennis Clarke writes:
> > The software package at Blastwave ( built by you ) is built on Solaris 8
> > such that we can rest assured that it runs as expected for users with
> > Solaris 8 and 9 and 10 and Nevada. If the package doe
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 05:19:08PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
>
> The original reason for /usr/sfw was to prevent users from wandering
> into External (extremely volatile; not necessarily compatible from
> patch to patch) software. But with GNOME integrating into /usr/bin as
> External and with
could be good idea.
I personally think that Sun could push a bit more on desktop market. JDS is
very good for many customers as it is simple, reliable and secure. We've got
customers using JDS from the first release on linux (2003) and they're very
happy and satisfy. I know that there're many ot
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:26:51PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 17:45 -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:00:28PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 23:46 +0100, Peter Tribble wrote:
> > > > - ca
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:00:28PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 23:46 +0100, Peter Tribble wrote:
> > - can I request a specific version?
>
> yes
Thats not exactly true. Only if the archive happens to keep old versions,
or if its a "gcc3" vs "gcc4" thing, where people are e
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:47:20PM -0700, William D. Hathaway wrote:
> One thing I'd like to see in Blastwave standards is the separation of bin/lib
> from config/data. While I was a massive fan of CSW on Solaris 9, when trying
> to build S10+ machines with large numbers of zones, it seemed I li
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 09:47:21PM -0700, Hugh McIntyre wrote:
> Philip Brown wrote:
> >>> While blastwave does it, I can't use blastwave as a part of some
> >>> other solution. And that's the problem with all the package
> >>> management s
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 05:44:18AM -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
> > no, it's still the java programmers fault
>
> Truth be told, I don't care whose fault it is, all I know is that it's
>SLOW and that the language is complicated even for the simplest of things.
It's not a scripting language.
Compared
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 08:16:38AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Perhaps we need to understand which OS release this is exactlyu and
> how single user boot is done.
>
> (If it boots from a pre-S10 network image, SCSI options will be set
> to "crawl")
Also, certain boot image versions, had net
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 06:28:20AM -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
> > Nice troll, but stuff like Looking Glass proves it's
> > an unfounded
> > bias. Bad programming makes apps slow.
>
> It's not a troll, it's a fact Sun marketing doesn't like to hear! Just run a
> Java program in a web browser, then
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 04:05:47PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote:
> ...
> While blastwave does it, I can't use blastwave as a part of some
> other solution. And that's the problem with all the package
> management systems - they're fine, as long as you use them in
> complete isolation.
>
> The underl
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:16:04PM -1000, David J. Orman wrote:
>Sun just needs to pick something, stand behind it, and give it a bit of
support (make sure things are up to Sun's high stability/etc standards.)
Tee Hee...
We've learned one or two things from sun's original companion cd
distribut
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 04:17:42PM -0700, Hugh McIntyre wrote:
> Potentially what would help here is to integrate a stub pkg-get command
> into the base install, but out of the box this would just be a wrapper,
> not linked to any specific back-end repository.
>
great idea. and actually, alread
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:51:31AM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Philip Brown wrote:
> > actually, it isnt all that great in non-tunnel mode either. We couldnt get
> > it working between solaris 9 and windows xp servers, fyi.
> >
> > I'd like to see THAT be 100%
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 03:15:21PM -0700, YJ Fan wrote:
> Is there any IDE controller driver availble in Solaris 10?
yes.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:53:01PM -0700, Dan McDonald wrote:
> Hello OpenSolaris folks!
>
> I would like to open an OpenSolaris project - IPsec Tunnel Reform. Please
> read on if you'd like to learn more about the project.
>
> The IPsec implementation in Solaris interoperates very well with ot
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 03:54:50PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 10:47:27PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
> > > http://www.bolthole.com/solaris/drivers/vgatext.html
> > >
> > > has
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 05:01:42PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 16:54 -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:52:48PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > > sound like debdelta which has been around for years is what you are
> > >
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 12:19:50PM +0530, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
> Philip Brown wrote:
> >http://www.bolthole.com/solaris/drivers/vgatext.html
> >
> >
>fstobdf(1) should be able to convert to BDF fonts if one is running a
>fontserver.
Thank you! I've
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 10:47:27PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
> http://www.bolthole.com/solaris/drivers/vgatext.html
>
> has a link to a tarball I hastily threw together of the resulting code.
PS: there are two points of interest in my code:
1. it theoretically allows use of other fo
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 12:24:11PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
> ...
> I'm too lazy to see if vgatext and ALL associated bits, are now CDDL'd.
> If someone will confirm this (and email my regular address off-list to
> prod me)
> then perhaps I will remember to contribute
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 05:12:07PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 16:59 -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
> > for starters, the general community doesnt need to be able to
> > "re-upload to unstable". Only maintainers do :-)
>
> I'm sorry, but
(forgive me for changing the order of quotes a bit, but I think it makes
sense, and still keeps original intentions...)
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:52:48PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 16:33 -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
> > Nothing says that opensolaris has to hav
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:52:48PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > Switching gears a bit, though: last I heard, debian does not have a binary
> > patching system. just a source code packaging system, that primarily exists
> > as
> > "original tarball + set of patches", as you noted.
>
> sound like
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 03:23:25PM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> I think it is worse on Solaris because it looks like you can work it out
> and it appears to be predictable :-(
well, at least once you have a particular box's naming scheme worked out,
it is reasonably predictable.
"eri1" will AL
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:19:23PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> The problem I'm seeing is that SVR4 packaging system wasn't developed to
> inter-operate with upstream tarballs and patching system is not an easy
> one to enable. At least it is not as easy as with Debian or RPM. That
> means patches
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:42:12AM -0700, Nicolas Linkert wrote:
> What do companies want? Most of them want a product:
> - that's independent from a vendor - that's why many choose Debian - and not
> Red Hat or SUSE -
> - they need a business desktop / they need a reliable server
> - they want p
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:28:53PM -0700, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> What would be needed in the way of additional drivers, boot support, etc to
> make
> that happen? Is sufficient info available from publically available
> OpenSolaris code,
> etc?
you shouldnt need any extra drivers, etc, et
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:19:22AM -0700, Rich Teer wrote:
> Agreed, although I have some concern about the marketing aspects. Keep on
> marketing to the converted, but I think the biggest challenge for Sun's
> marketroids is converting the uninitiated, i.e., creating more Sun/Solaris
> brand awar
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 07:26:13AM -0700, Tom Smith wrote:
> Hi. I've been thinking about building a SOHO NAS project using ZFS as
> some others have suggested doing but I'm curious how lightweight I can make
> Solaris (from a processor, memory, and install disk space) perspective and
> still have
bahahaha
Im reviewing changes to vgatext since my hacks, and was amused to find the
following:
if (happyface_boot == 0)
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 07:42:59AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> In the case that actually replaced the console driver, the VT support was
> described by the project team as little used and unnecessary:
>
> c) "VT" support. [...]
> mechanisms. These users can either use utilit
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 02:36:49PM +0800, Riny Qian wrote:
> > sure, if you're willing to recompile the vgatext driver. ;)
> >
>
> Then you can also change the console window size from 25x80 to others.
> This seems a good opensolaris project :-)
I'm too lazy to see if vgatext and ALL associated
One thing that I dont see mentioned in this thread, that is semi-related:
it would be nice to keep the [] tags, BUT, have intelligent
mailserver-side stripping of "Re" addons.
If you're going to auto-add-on [] tags, the software should first strip
out initial "Re:" lines.
In other words.
S
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 04:09:26PM -0400, Dave Miner wrote:
> Philip Brown wrote:
> > Solaris patching isnt particularly bad. [It has its faults, but its been
> > in use for over a decade now] Debian's, from what I here, is the
> > "fragile" one.
> >
&g
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 07:50:35PM -0400, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 14:44 -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
> > Interesting.
> >
> > This is not a deliberate thing. Apparently, it's just a side-effect of
> > using sun compilers with the -fast
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 01:57:42PM -0400, Dave Miner wrote:
> Eric Boutilier wrote:
> > I'm not sure Nexenta's implementation is the way to go though. It seems
> > to me that Phil's pkg-get -- being designed around Sun's implementation
> > of the SVr4 packaging standard -- seems like the better c
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 06:10:31PM -0700, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> Sun has staff now to handle most of what they do, but this doesn't
> allow Sun to work with the community.
btw: there's a difference between "working with the community", and
"meeting the needs of the community".
you dont have to do
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 06:10:31PM -0700, Alan DuBoff wrote:
>
> Blastwave essentially dropped their stable tree anyway, didn't you?
Just the opposite. We finally found someone to step up to the plate and
do the hard work, for free. James Lee is our official stable tree
maintainer, and we've been
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 05:54:15PM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> Philip Brown wrote:
> >The thing about all that, is that it forces the machine to be closer and
> >closer to a linux machine, until eventually, it becomes nothing more than a
> >linux machine with a user-inv
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 04:23:17PM -0700, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> So, how would it be possible to build a large set of libraries that everyone
> could update and use together? Is this at all possible? Sun has basically
> proposed to work with the community, and that is happening, albeit
> slowly...
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:02:20PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 22:08 -0700, ken mays wrote:
> > Going back to the comments about Nexenta build system:
>
> Nexenta build system == Debian build system
>
> The equation above means that NexentaOS following
> Debian Policy[1] as
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:53:44AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> PB> [really, it should give the patches to openssl.org. but barring that,
> PB> it would be nice to see a patch set just posted somewhere, like
> PB> opensolaris.org]
>
>
> http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/on/usr/src/com
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 03:35:52AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
>
> Saturday, April 15, 2006, 2:27:45 AM, PB writes...
>
> PB> Basically, blastwave packages are set up to be binary distributions, not
> PB> developer distributions.
> PB> If you want to compile other stuff against our packages, y
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 02:13:11AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> Hello James,
>
> Thursday, April 13, 2006, 2:06:40 PM, you wrote:
>
> JC> Hugh McIntyre writes:
>
> JC> That's also what Debian does. That fixes the dependency problem, but
> JC> doesn't fix the path problem.
>
> JC> The path
Hi folks,
I was informed there was a bit of a broohaha over here, about packaging up
open source binaries for solaris and opensolaris.
So, as the author of pkg-get, and the creator/leader of the CSW packaging
efforts living on blastwave.org, I thought I'd poke my head in and wave.
*wave*.
I've b
I blame ZFS for this one, but it was inevitable anyway. I love my Sun Cobalt
Qube 3 to bits, but it is getting rather long in the tooth. A while back I
migrated most of my home network services to Solaris 10 on my son's old Athlon
PC. It now has four large IDE drives serving our house with over
Does anyone have experience of installing and running on a GX520?
I have a GX280 handy as well I've found that one mentioned a few times which
looks promising, but I would have to move my Linux installation off it and so
would prefer to put OpenSolaris on the new machine if I can.
This message p
>From what I've seen so far, a current-model Dell should be OK except wireless
>may be a while off ready. I have a budget I have to spend this year (in
>practice this means by end October) but my serious use will start next year so
>provided wireless is being worked on that would be OK.
Anyone
I am thinking of getting a notebook to run OpenSolaris. Our tech people prefer
to buy Dell or HP. There are a few models at
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/data/sol/systems/views/laptop_all_results.page1.html
if this is the right place to check compatability. Does anyone have experience
of curr
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:24:14PM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
>
> I have to admit to knowing almost nothing about Ret Hat Inc's position
> (in theory or practice) on POSIX.
i think its about the same as most other linux places:
"We'll follow POSIX as much as possible... or until we dont feel l
Ok, I'm in now ... but I had to change my password yet gain ... only this time
it worked.
Thanks,
Phil
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
A little more information about this issue. I am trying to do this install on a
Dell C840 Laptop. I have also tried this same media on a Dell C600 Laptop and
it installs fine, so the media appears to not be the issue.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
lly a programmer but from
the msgbuf output it seems to panic upon loading the pci_autoload module.
Philip
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
77 matches
Mail list logo
