At 11:19 17.3.2003 +0100, you wrote:
Hello,
for quite a long time now, I'm trying to get my hands on one of those
60ties screens like the SC-69 or SG-60. Has anyone of you a hint for
me, where I could get those - particularly in Germany? Thank you very
much in advance.
Thomas
Try our friendly
What is a trigger winder?
I believe this refers to the LeicaVit base mounted winder. A bit of a
curiousity.
Kind regards
Peter Blake
Hi Alan,
So you just glued two tapes in a proper place and that is all?I do not have M135/3.5
but my brother has so I shall see on which place you did it. I wonder if SMC K 135/2.5
and SMC K 105/2.8 have the same layout of rear mount to put the tapes at the same
place. ANy comments.
Thank you!
And it really gives matrix? and spot with PZ1?
Alek
Uytkownik Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
http://www3.telus.net/wlachan/M135back.jpg
regards,
Alan Chan
Cost me $5 and a few mins to gain matrix metering. :)
About masking some contacts I have read. I know that Alan did so with his
What is a trigger winder?
I believe this refers to the LeicaVit base mounted winder.
Yes.
A bit of a
curiousity.
Maybe, but it seems a wonderful device when you need fast film advance that
would be virtually silent.
Regards,
£ukasz
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 14:59:04 -0500, Caveman wrote:
What's *your* favorite LX focus screen ? Why ?
I use the SC-69 (split + microprism) in the LX and the SG-60 matte
grid in my 2nd MX.
Both are the new bright types, supplied by Peter (Camera Direct).
I started out using the grid screen in
Pentax abandoned this segment so long ago that no one thinks of Pentax
when they look for high end/high tech cameras. It would take years of
work (that Pentax was never willing to do) to change the perception of
the brand. Most people who are fans of taking pictures, rather than
camera brands,
Jan van Wijk schrieb:
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 14:59:04 -0500, Caveman wrote:
What's *your* favorite LX focus screen ? Why ?
I use the SC-69 (split + microprism) in the LX and the SG-60 matte
grid in my 2nd MX...
Hello,
I already asked earlier, but it seems my message didn't make it through.
HI
So what dou you suggest?
Alek
Uytkownik Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Pentax abandoned this segment so long ago that no one thinks of Pentax
when they look for high end/high tech cameras. It would take years of
work (that Pentax was never willing to do) to change the
USM and IS are not only for pro's. But speaking of pro's, I have seen many
pro's with EOS 3 and F100. They're lighter and capable of producing
professional results. Even EOS 30/33 and F80 has a pro-appeal, especially as
2nd bodies. So, Pentax does not have to do a F5 or EOS 1.
Best wishes,
Buy the equipment/technology you need from whoever sells it. Companies
do not look after you; you don't worry about companies. Vote with your
dollars, it's the only thing companies understand.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI
So what dou you suggest?
Alek
I think Bruce has a point here (and no, it's not on his head)...
We have to remember, while we, loyal Pentax users, would love to see the
brand grow and flourish, Pentax's target market in 35mm SLR has, I believe,
always been amateur or entry level.
This does not mean that they do not produce
Hi Roland, hi all,
Roland Mabo wrote:
Choosing SLR, is choosing a system. Those who wish to use the SLR
primarly for ps photography doesn't bother, but those who are
serious about learning photography - who sees photography as an
art, as a hobby or as an income - thinks about SLR as a
The only time pros buy these cameras is when their parts are used in
DSLRs. The #1 concern of muost pros is reliability, and no matter how
well mid range consumer cameras work they don't have a very solid feel,
and pros don't trust them. The EOS 3 and F100 are sold by their makers
as pro
At 14:51 17.3.2003 +0100, Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
... I bought an EOS 30 (Elan 7e) and the top-rated lenses EF
70-200/4 USM L and 28-105/3.5-4.5 USM. What can I say, I wasn't feeling
sick anymore. USM may be seen just as a gimmick by some on this list,
but USM lenses have full-time manual and
IMHO, they do, if it wasn't for the EOS1/F5 they wouldn't sell as many of
the lower models. People buy the F100 and tell themselves that ok I couldn't
afford the F5 or my back can't handle the weight but I did buy the second
best camera available, its selling lots and lots of the lower models that
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 08:49:34 -0500
I think Bruce has a point here (and no, it's not on his head)...
We have to remember, while we, loyal Pentax users, would love to see the
brand grow and flourish, Pentax's target market in 35mm SLR has, I
believe,
Hi Bojidar,
I understand your decision - but I feel that Pentax are moving towards USM
and IS. And I believe that the *ist D has support for this technology.
But, the question is always - how long will it take?
New bodies and lenses with USM and IS. I believe that some might be released
this
On March 17, 2003 09:15 am, Roland Mabo wrote:
enthusiastic amateurs as Pentax calls it.
This is not a bad thing, but eventually - amateurs wants more than the el
cheapo plastic le chique consumer zooms, they start to explore new areas of
photography. They discover macrophotography and the
It has always been my experience that animals look better on warm-tone
film. I tried NPZ 800 and it was just too cold. Supra 800 gives me
the fine grain, contrast and warm tones that I look for under less than
ideal early morning and foggy conditions. I use Portra NC, both 160
and 400, as
Dear list,
recently the spring of my MZ-5n's flash has gone south. The flash can be
released but won't stay up.
Browsing the PDML archives I found some members reporting the same problem
and various speculations
about the location of the spring and whether this could be easily fixed but
no
Indian Paintbrush was already blooming in the hills around Bastrop this
weekend. Since Indian Paintbrush depends upon Bluebonnets, they can't
be too far behind. It might be a little too early this week, but I'll
bet you can find lots of wild flowers in the area between Llano and
Burnet
We did our taxes this weekend and found that we owe some money ...
anyway, it's time to sell a few things.
ME Super SE: Chrome. Beautiful condition -- of all the cameras I have
ever gotten used, this one is in the closest to like-new condition
that I have seen. It has that beautiful ME Super
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:47:29 +0100, Th. Stach wrote:
I use the SC-69 (split + microprism) in the LX and the SG-60 matte
grid in my 2nd MX...
Hello,
I already asked earlier, but it seems my message didn't make it through.
So please excuse me, if this comes twice.
For quite a long
I have an Asahi Pentax SL with SL meter in bargain condition,
includes case. Some bright marks and other external wear, but the
mirror foam has been replaced and the shutter speeds were checked and
adjusted about a year ago. The meter works and seems accurate,
although the original knob that
Coming to a fairground near you: Tom's Scratch and Dent Sale!
If only i had spare cash, but alas, I'm saving for a DSLR.
Christian
On Monday 17 March 2003 01:29, tom wrote:
These will go on Ebay Wednesday (or as soon as I get the pics done),
so if you're interested, let me know. Will
Bojidar: Interesting approach and conclusion. I can see your reasons for
leaving... But don't ever forget that it is the photographs that make the
difference not the camera, not even really the lenses. If you want the latest
and greatest USM, IS etc, go out and get it, but it really won't make
Hello gang,
I've just got an e-mail from Pentax Scandinavia. They writes - In the *ist
user manual, the compatibility chart will only contain KA, KAF and
KAF2-mount lenses.
So, no K and M lenses on the *ist.
The *ist D will have full K-compatibility, but not the filmbased *ist.
Now we know.
Note that the auction was closed early. eBay rules allow a seller to do
this if and only if they then sell the goods to the current high bidder at
the time. They do not have to sell the item at the current bid price when
they close the auction.
I would imagine that the high bidder made the
Nick Zentena wrote:
Pentax needs something like the Mamiya 645e. People are buying into the 645e
who would never have looked at Mamiya higher priced models.
I don't know what Pentax actually needs, and it's not my business to
decide it anyway. But I definitely know that I'm eyeing a Bronica
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bojidar: Interesting approach and conclusion. I can
see your reasons for
leaving... But don't ever forget that it is the
photographs that make the
difference not the camera, not even really the
lenses. If you want the latest
and greatest USM, IS etc, go out
Tony,
I have used both Minolta Scan Dual II and Minolta Scan Elite II. Here is my
opinion about these.
About H/w
Some Minolta scanners have banding problems, except this these scanners are excellent
and I like the
multi-film auto-load trays.
I would suggest, try to scan both negatives
Paul wrote_
Do you know something about Pentax future that we don't?
Note: This is an honest question.
REPLY:
The honest answer is that I don't know what you know so I cannot answer the question
honestly. Anyway, I don't pretend to know anything about the future. However, it is
possible to
Ryan wrote:
So what? If you're not Canon, just give up? That doesn't sound like a better plan.
Reply:
So what what? I didn't suggest rolling over and play dead. I suggested that it was
going to be difficult and more than just the products are needed.
Pentax is suffering in the image
Alin wrote:
If the existing Pentax users are present in their *istD sales
projection then I expect them to be very, very scrupulous about
the support for K/M lenses.
Even the incompatibility of new KAF3 lenses with old cameras will
be almost inconsequential compared to the
I got this from Pentax U.S.A regarding the filmbased *ist.
---
Roland,
Thank you for contacting Pentax USA, Inc.
Our preliminary information regarding lenses, indicates the following Pentax
lenses maybe used:
Pentax mounts KAF2, KAF, and KA - these mounts are for our SMCP-FA, F, and
A series
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want the latest
and greatest USM, IS etc, go out and get it, but it really won't make you a
better photographer.
Boz clearly stated that he is a technical head more than an artist,
and I can understand his reasoning. It's his money, and he's free to
spend it as
...
Of the Irish single malts, I do like Connemara. Fine stuff.
Of the ones distilled in Scotland, Oban tops my list, followed by
Cardhu and Glen Morangie Cellar 13, both too good to be called second choice.
...
And Lagavulin !
Or from France Cognac and Armagnac.
Michel
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 17:38:11 +0100
I'm sure many disagree with this but I'm certain that the numbers of
owners of K and M lenses that are going to buy a new DSLR is limited
indeed.
But Pentax has some special lenses and accessories that requires a
It is indeed a sad day for Pentax and the PDML that the great
Bojidar Dimitrov is leaving. His fabulous K mount page is world class,
and this is a sad indication of the state that Pentax has left it's
advanced users.
It is not offering any support or encouragement in the top echelons
Hi Boz,
Any system is not the be all and end all, just like with many other things,
when you feel it doesn't perform then you are free to change. What is more
important is that you are still a photographer.
Many thanks for the KMP site, which has given me and many others an
invaluable source of
Lot's of French spirits are being poured down the sewer here in the USA at
the present time :-)
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Michel Carrère-Gée [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:01 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Whiskey (Was the things we do for money)
...
Thank goodness one of the single malts I like is down in the
occasionally affordable despite my starving-artist budget
price range: Loch Du. The others I know I like (I'm still
a beginner, so there's a lot of tasting to do) are out of my
league financially. *sigh* Balvenie Portwood *sigh*
for quite a long time now, I'm trying to get my hands on one of those
60ties screens like the SC-69 or SG-60. Has anyone of you a hint for
me, where I could get those - particularly in Germany? Thank you very
much in advance.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] This guy just sold me 2, for 25 pounds ea. His
That SUX...
L
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 10:01, Roland Mabo wrote:
Hello gang,
I've just got an e-mail from Pentax Scandinavia. They writes - In the *ist
user manual, the compatibility chart will only contain KA, KAF and
KAF2-mount lenses.
So, no K and M lenses on the *ist.
The *ist D
From: Cameron Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:13:07 -0800
the *ist D is way too late, and it better be cheap because it's last years'
technology
last years' technology? Why are you saying that?
What's last year in it? We haven't seen the complete specification yet,
but from what
Some guy wrote:
As I have said before, IS is fine for lazy photographer
and special applications like shooting from a boat or something)
but I use a tripod almost all the time and IS lenses would
add nothing but cost to my outfit
If it adds nothing to *your* outfit, then that's one
I don't know what Pentax actually needs, and it's not my business to
decide it anyway. But I definitely know that I'm eyeing a Bronica GS-1.
I'm pretty much sure that the 6x7 format will let me get much better
enlargements than 35mm with USM, IS, VR, SW and whatnot. And lots of fun.
Just make
Bruce wrote:
Buy the equipment/technology you need from whoever
sells it. Companies
do not look after you; you don't worry about
companies. Vote with your
dollars, it's the only thing companies understand.
Yup this is true. There have been many a Nikon users
who have switched or at the
Bruce wrote:
If you spent a
couple of months using a F100 and N80, you would
know why N80's aren't
used as backups to F100's. Backup bodies are:
another F100, or the
photographers old, N90, F3 or FM2n.
Sure this may be true generally. However Galen Rowell
aways like taking his N80 when
in brilliant sunlight with high speed film. that has its own compromises.
Herb.
- Original Message -
From: Gregory L. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 14:21
Subject: Re: Usefulness of IS lenses
Some people on the newsgroups have reported
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, William Robb wrote:
I believe my father kept a bottle of Vermouth in the garage. When he made a
Martini, he would look at the garage while pouring the gin into the glass.
Now, now, you have to at least WAVE the vermouth cap over the glass.
(at least I'm not with people who
Thanks, good to know. The Takumar probably is overrated then.
Would the image quality of Zeiss Flektogon 20mm be near the K-mount Pentax
20mms? There are f4 and a f2.8 (newer) versions running on german ebay just
now
Regards
Bernd
-original message--
- Original Message -
From: Levente -Levi- Littvay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *ist - not compatible with K and M lenses (confirmed).
That SUX...
Yes, more than anything.
Until now I was going to buy the *ist - but not anymore... I'll wait for
something else.
This means IMHO that the
Hi,
Monday, March 17, 2003, 5:21:02 PM, you wrote:
Lot's of French spirits are being poured down the sewer here in the USA at
the present time :-)
I read somewhere recently that fast food joints in the USA aren't
selling French Fries any more, but 'Liberty Fries'! I nearly had to
go to
Now I don't follow you.
The *ist is an entry level body, the entry model in the new *ist serie.
For years, ever since the MZ-50 came out, Pentax entry bodies has lacked
support for K and M mount lenses. This is not a new thing, this is not a new
approach. The MZ-50, then the MZ-30, then the
Actual I can't remember because I have looked for several different lenses
and might mix them. But I noticed that a SMC A 20/2.8 went for a price I
didn't want to spend by the way. I have already the wonderful FA* 24/2.0 and
I am not sure if I am really in need of a 20mm. But there is a little bit
I read somewhere recently that fast food joints in the USA aren't
selling French Fries any more, but 'Liberty Fries'! I nearly had to
go to hospital I laughed so much at that one.
The cafeteria in the US Congress now calls them Freedom Fries
I seem to recall the French doing you guys a lot
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:27:51 -0500, Bill Owens wrote:
I seem to recall us returning the favor twice in the 20th century, as
evidenced by the thousands of US soldiers buried in French soil.
and how easily they forget.
Later,
Gary
Roland Mabo wrote
Now I don't follow you.
The *ist is an entry level body, the entry model in the new *ist serie.
For years, ever since the MZ-50 came out, Pentax entry bodies has lacked
support for K and M mount lenses. This is not a new thing, this is not a new
approach. The MZ-50, then the
Peter Jansen escribió:
Definitely two types of Pentax users.
It is not so easy to draw a dividing line between two different types of
Pentax users. I have 14 different lenses and 3 teleconverters in Pentax
K mount. 10 of the lenses are AF (F, FA or FA*) and 4 MF (K, M and A).
And 3 of the
Herb Chong said:
in brilliant sunlight with high speed film. that has its own compromises.
Herb.
- Original Message -
From: Gregory L. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 14:21
Subject: Re: Usefulness of IS lenses
Some people on the
- Original Message -
From: Roland Mabo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *ist - not compatible with K and M lenses (confirmed).
Now I don't follow you.
The *ist is an entry level body, the entry model in the new *ist serie.
For years, ever since the MZ-50 came out, Pentax entry bodies
Boz, it's been such a pleasure to work with you on the KMP and to
read your post on the list. I hope you'll be able to maintain the
KMP and that you'll show up on the list once in a while to give us a
sense of what it is to be with the competition... and what Pentax
should do to maintain a
Thanks, good to know. The Takumar probably is overrated then.
Would the image quality of Zeiss Flektogon 20mm be near the K-mount Pentax
20mms? There are f4 and a f2.8 (newer) versions running on german ebay just
now
Regards
Bernd
Bern, it's true that the 20mm Takumar is not distorsion free (like,
Can't even wait until the new camera even comes out, right?
We all know, or should, that Pentax U.S.A. doesn't know squat! Never
did, never will.
If Pentax Japan doesn't tell them, which they normally don't, the USA
marketing arm knows nothing.
Forget the specs they quote. They don't know.
Until
From: Artur Ledóchowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 21:56:12 +0100
This I know well of course:) However Pentax has changed its approach
radically. None of the previous entry level cripled-mount bodies is so
much packed with features.
It depends on how you see it. Even the MZ-60 has
Note: The following comments apply more to the film *ist than to the
*ist D
Just over a year ago I was inspired to finally take up photography,
something I had always wanted to do but never seemed to have the time
or money for. Unfortunately, I still didn't have the money, so I
looked
Mike Nosal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would imagine that the high bidder made the seller a
reasonable offer,
and the seller decided they didn't want to wait for the
auction to end,
only to discover there wasn't enough bidding to drive the
price up to the
level the buyer offered.
Hi Mike,
Boz,
I want to thank you for all of the effort that you put into the KMP.
It's a really great resource. I hope that, if you decide to stop
maintaining it, you'll consider finding another serious Pentax head to
take over the maintenance.
If you make the switch to Canon completely, perhaps you'll
Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read somewhere recently that fast food joints in the USA aren't
selling French Fries any more, but 'Liberty Fries'! I nearly had to
go to hospital I laughed so much at that one.
In revenge, the French have decided to refer to American Cheese
as.American
Pentax Scandinavia, who translates the *ist user manual from english to
swedish, confirms that the *ist is not compatible with K and M lenses. They
should now, since they written it in the user manual!
It's clear now that the first press release from Pentax U.S.A contained
errors, and that
Dave wrote:
Pentax's target market in 35mm SLR has, I believe,
always been amateur or entry level.
REPLY:
Canon target market have also always been entry level. They have in fact dominated
this segment for 25 years. The wast majority of all Nikon and Canon gear sold is entry
level.
DAVE:
This
Roland wrote:
I understand your decision - but I feel that Pentax are moving towards USM and IS. And
I believe that the *ist D has support for this technology.
But, the question is always - how long will it take?
New bodies and lenses with USM and IS. I believe that some might be released this
From: Matt Bevers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 16:19:14 -0500
If I were to buy right now, my choices based on price would be a ZX-L,
ZX-5n or an *ist. Of these, the *ist definitely seems to be the best
feature-wise, but if it can't use K and M lenses (and it seems like it
won't be
On March 17, 2003 11:17 am, Caveman wrote:
Nick Zentena wrote:
Pentax needs something like the Mamiya 645e. People are buying into the
645e who would never have looked at Mamiya higher priced models.
I don't know what Pentax actually needs, and it's not my business to
decide it anyway.
I heard that there's a movement afoot to change the name of French Toast to
something else (I don't remember what ). The irony is (so I've heard) is
that French Toast is so named because it was first served in a New York
restaurant owned by a certain Mr. French... vbg
Of course, you can't
On March 17, 2003 01:46 pm, Roland Mabo wrote:
Pentax must supply what the market demands.
Great now define the market. Ask 100 people here and I bet you'll get 101
different answers. Maybe 201.
Nick
I've noticed a few jibes and pokes at the French over the past couple of
days or week, what with their veto threat on Security Council. So far
nothing really terrible has been said, but it's starting...
Could we keep politics off the list please? It's not only due to the
fact that there are
For a lot of types of photography, it may not make you a better
photographer, but you will get better photographs.
Most of this misty-eyed, romantic, manual drivel comes from people with
little of no experience using current high-end equipment.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want the
I agree, Frank, and I apologize for my previous post.
BTW, I understand that Belgium is claiming credit for French Fries
Bill
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:12 PM
Subject: No politics, please
I've
They took different pictures. You couldn't create the images with the
old gear that you can with the new.
If you like the 1942 look, fine. Not everyone does.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of this talk about how important USM, IS, FPS makes me wonder how in the
hell did anybody ever take a
Bruce wrote:
I have no idea why people think that a company 1/10 the size of Canon would have the
same RD budget as Canon.
REPLY:
Ideas are like beards. Men doesn't have them until they grow up.
Incidentally, didn't you say the same thing about a Pentax DSLR? That they would never
make one
Galen Rowell is unfortunately dead. He used the N80, and previously the N60, for their very light weight for rock/mountain climbing. It's a rather special use, and I wouldn't draw general conclusions from it.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure this may be true generally. However Galen Rowell
Pal;
Pentax's current flagship - MZ-S - is, even by those on this list,
considered a failure.
Pentax's last decent model was the MZ-5n IMHO.
What's left?
MZ-L, MZ-6 etc. none of which are beyond advanced amateur. The same could
be said for Minolta's offerings outside of their nicely spec'd
none of the others do. it's really a question of what else can the monitor show that
would be hard to do in a viewfinder. right now, nothing has come up that will help
take a better picture. there are two places where i think it would be a really really
big advantage. one is when you need to
NEVER judge people by their government's actions. (if you want to go
down that path, it's probably better for you, Americans, not to travel
nowadays) Every person is entiteled to have an opinion about others...
but don't base it on someone's government's behavior.
I know lots of French people
Thanks for keeping politics off of the list...
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 7:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: THE FRENCH
I seem to recall the French doing you guys a lot of favours way back
in the 18th
Thanks Fred: You are exactly right. I was not in any way suggesting Boj was lazy ... I
was, in fact, trying to convince him not to leave Pentax for the bells and whistles
that Canon and Nikon offer. As photographers, collectors and gadget freaks (which most
of us are including myself) I think
David Chang-Sang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax's current flagship - MZ-S - is, even by those on this list,
considered a failure.
What???
Mark Roberts
MZ-S owner
NO Politics please
__
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
How many look at your cameras when you are out? I never had anyone come out
and tell me how beautiful my equipment is. Never had anyone come up to me
and say how tacky my LX, 645, or ESII are.
I am happy that Pentax is still in the medium format business. I would be
interested if a digital
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:.
So you're saying that the French were mistaken in thinking that the US
troops were liberating them instead of simply subjecting them to rule
by another overlord?
Huh?
Hi,
Well, said. Thank you for articulating what I couldn't - and in a much
more civil way than I might have, too! g
Maybe we can get back to Pentax and photography issues now.
cheers,
frank
Levente -Levi- Littvay wrote:
NEVER judge people by their government's actions. (if you want to go
Where would the world be without a United States of America?
Are you sure you want to hear answers to this one? Somehow I don't all the replies
would be to your liking.
-Scott
On 17 Mar 2003 at 20:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Fred: You are exactly right. I was not in any way suggesting Boj was lazy
... I was, in fact, trying to convince him not to leave Pentax for the bells and
whistles that Canon and Nikon offer.
I doubt Boz's move is about bells and
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:51:33 +0100, you wrote:
Best wishes to all and thanks for all I've learned from you!
To all KMP contributors most sincere thanks!
Bojidar Dimitrov
Many thanks for the KMP site, Boz. I've enjoyed it many times.
I bought a Nikon D100 DSLR, intending to hold onto my Pentax
Fine whatever the reason. If you want high tech/high end you buy from
someone other than Pentax. Pentax spent a lot of years successfully
creating the perception among buyers that they aren't a first line SLR
maker. No matter what sort of hand waving, smoke and mirrors exercise
you want to go
Jim Apilado wrote:
How many look at your cameras when you are out?
I've had numerous inquiries regarding my 6x7. People are intrigued by
the fact that it looks like an SLR on steroids. But my recently acquired
Leica IIIf draws a crowd. I've only been using it for a week, but people
That's inflammatory, and it's exactly what we don't need.
Scott Nelson wrote:
Where would the world be without a United States of America?
Are you sure you want to hear answers to this one? Somehow I don't all the replies
would be to your liking.
-Scott
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
