Hi Caveman,
on 12 Jun 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
Bruce R is probably eating his foot now...
LOL. Maybe Nikon's larger mount will be compatible to the Pentax
645NII...;-) Or even larger - 67?
Cheers, Heiko
LOL. Maybe Nikon's larger mount will be compatible to the Pentax
645NII...;-) Or even larger - 67?
Cool! Canon will be no match to Nikon for any super fast lenses.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2
Who needs them with digital... you just crank up the ISO speed dial
Alan Chan wrote:
LOL. Maybe Nikon's larger mount will be compatible to the Pentax
645NII...;-) Or even larger - 67?
Cool! Canon will be no match to Nikon for any super fast lenses.
regards,
Alan Chan
Who needs them with digital... you just crank up the ISO speed dial
The faster it was turned, the higher the ISO was.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
Hi, Jim,
Roman Holiday was Audrey's first Hollywood movie (I used quotes, because it was
filmed entirely on location in Rome - one of the first movies shot on location).
She had bit parts in a few English pics, but this was her first big role.
She did win the Oscar for it.
Eddie Albert was a
Think I would choose 85 for slightly shorter working distance, especially
indoor.
If I had this lens, my choice would be the same, but, as I only have the
100/2.8... :-)
Regards,
ukasz
===
www.fotopolis.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If true, this is strange. Especially since they've just introduced the DX lens series.
Another solution could be that they intend to maintain two systems. Based in the
cheaper APS-size sensors as well as the larger and more expencive full format sensors.
Much like Pentax and Contax having
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does any one know of a smallish flash that will work with a 24mm lens?
I'm just after something basic with auto and manual.
Slide the wide adapter on the AF200T. It also works on the AF280T, but you
said smallish. I paid $9.00 for one with shipping from the UK to
Conjures up images of a buffoonish constable singing Hello, Hello,
Hello, what's going on here then? in the style of Gilbert Sullivan or
Nessun Dorma - in my airport! by some privatised goon.
I've only met Mike twice but I have a vision of Harry Secombe.
Breastfed on 'Rommel - Gunner
Yes, with regard to the focal length I agree.
What I'm curious about is the optical quality. If I understand it correctly the Super
Takumar does not have SMC. Is that such a drawback that it rules this lens out? And
besides the lack of SMC what are the optical quality of the lens compared to
In case you had not noticed, I am selling some shiny Pentax toys on ebay.
http://cgi6.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItemsinclude=0userid
=shatcho%40aol.comsort=2rows=25since=-1rd=1
Most are lovely, one or two are exceptional, best of all they are all very
reasonable.
Kind regards
Tried posting this last night but I was having email problems, so forgive me
if it shows up twice.
Our International members may not be aware of this, but the American Film
Institute recently voted Gregory Peck's Atticus Finch as the greatest movie
hero of all time.
Evan
I probably would have bought one (Shift) several years
ago if it had the tilt feature.
Kenneth Waller
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 06:13:18 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 13/06/03 03:18:01 GMT Daylight
Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just had this news from a
All my lenses are of the compatible variety except one. Yet when
multiplying the focal lengths with the 1.5 factor I only get two
usable lenses, so digital looks like a more expensive proposition
than just body and accessories.
Add to this the relatively low resolution and loss of
well, that is where i bought this roll from.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Lon Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 05:08
Subject: Re: OT wanted to buy - a piece of polarizing gel
Ann, I seem to recall that Edmund Scientific sells
sheets
At 07:14 13/6/03 +, you wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj
Hello,
I had a look at your Aurora GrandPrix June 06 gallery. My favourite picture is
DSC_2155.jpg. :-) It was really funny to see this one appear in that long sequence of
horse jumps (especially
I have recently updated and added quite a few equestrian related
photos to: http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj
Comments are welcomed,skin is thick these daysg
thick, eh? we'll see g
Overall, nice photos. I tried my hand at equestrian stuff not too
All great. He was quite good in a western too, 'The Gunfighter' (?)
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: Way OT: Gregory Peck passed on
Jim Apilado wrote:
I enjoyed his performances in
www.gratisweb.com/albanogarcia
Nice one Albano. You are a first class photographer mate!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk
At 07:14 13/6/03 +, you wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj
Hello,
I had a look at your Aurora GrandPrix June 06 gallery. My favourite picture is
DSC_2155.jpg. :-) It was really funny to see this one appear in that
Jerome cybered
thick, eh? we'll see g
Overall, nice photos. I tried my hand at equestrian stuff not too long ago; it
was interesting. It took a few missed shots to get the timing part down, but
that wasn't as bad as I thought it would be (I guess
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Conjures up images of a buffoonish constable singing Hello, Hello,
Hello, what's going on here then? in the style of Gilbert Sullivan or
Nessun Dorma - in my airport! by some privatised goon.
I've only met Mike twice but I have a vision of Harry Secombe.
Try 'The Big Country'. Peck, along with Charlton Heston, Jean Simmons,
Burl Ives, Chuck Connors and more. Good stuff.
Tony
At 05:59 AM 6/13/2003 -0700, you wrote:
All great. He was quite good in a western too, 'The Gunfighter' (?)
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL
At 04:49 PM 6/9/2003 +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
OK the D *ist isn't in our hands so we can only speculate based on what's
been
reported. So given what is known who of those of us that envisage moving
into
digital are likely to purchase a D *ist and why?
Who of us think it's time to move to the
Even though it wasn't his best, I also enjoy his perfomance as Capt.
Ahab in Moby Dick. AAMOF, his performance is the best part of the
movie.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
my SMC-FA 35/2 has arrived. Nice small piece of glass, with rubber focusing
ring wider than one in FA 50/1.4 or 28/2.8... Now I have to check it in
praktice. I hope I won't regret this buy :-)
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
Sylwester Pietrzyk schrieb:
Hi,
my SMC-FA 35/2 has arrived. Nice small piece of glass, with rubber focusing
ring wider than one in FA 50/1.4 or 28/2.8... Now I have to check it in
praktice. I hope I won't regret this buy :-)
--
Hi Sylwek,
if you really should regret this - which I
Spike was quite a photographer, on the quiet. I seem to remember a
series of ads 's [Nikon/Pentax?] where his comparatively new model
had had all of the horrible black paint removed (apparently with a nail
file or such) to show the lovely brass underneath. Wonder where it is
now?
Hi All,
...I hope I won't regret this buy :-)
...ask me first, if you want to sell it...
Anyone an MZ-S to sell? ;-)
There was a Like New Minus at KEH for about 24 hours, but only US$100 less
than new. I figured it was worth the extra US$100 to get the manuals and
warranty.
- THaller
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not in my shop. (Sadly). Now that would be a coup. Or is it a coupe? I do
have some of Tim Page's gear here though. A 300mm F2.8 (that looks like it went
to the Vietnam conflict).
Coup - unless it is big enough to need wheels. Or full of hens, in
which case it
Hello everybody,
In my plans for the near future (next month...) is included a
journey to England and Scotland.
I do already have a plane booked (one of those budget flights
without physical tickets...) but I'm feeling a bit in trouble
wrt renting a car on our arrival (at Stansted).
While
Thomas Haller schrieb:
Hi All,
...I hope I won't regret this buy :-)
...ask me first, if you want to sell it...
Anyone an MZ-S to sell? ;-)
There was a Like New Minus at KEH for about 24 hours, but only US$100 less
than new. I figured it was worth the extra US$100 to get the
Hi Sylwester,
on 13 Jun 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
I hope I won't regret this buy :-)
No, you won't. I love mine...
Cheers, Heiko
Don't see how you could regret it.
It's a new, _fast_, prime.
Good fer YOU!
See, Pentax, we spend money on occasion for
good SMC glass.
-Lon
Heiko Hamann wrote:
Hi Sylwester,
on 13 Jun 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
I hope I won't regret this buy :-)
No, you won't. I love mine...
Cheers,
Roland Mabo wrote:
So, what is best then...
a) A complete line of new USM and IS lenses and bodies, not compatible
with previous K-mount. A full electrical mount.
This one is already available. It's called Canon.
b) Some new USM and IS lenses, but with bodies that supports both the
new lenses
From: Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: K-mount again (was Re: More info on Tamron's new AF 28-75
f/2.8 Di
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:55:34 -0400
a) A complete line of new USM and IS lenses and bodies, not compatible
with previous K-mount. A full electrical mount.
This one is already
At 10:29 AM 13/06/2003 -0400, Yves wrote:
At 07:14 13/6/03 +, you wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj
Hello,
I had a look at your Aurora GrandPrix June 06 gallery. My favourite
picture is DSC_2155.jpg. :-) It was really funny to see this one appear in
that
Afaik, FA-J means FA-Junior. It's quite strange to name your best lenses
Junior - that's why I really think that FA-J lenses will only be entry
level. ;)
There is still hope...
Alex
Until now I've only been using polarizers as screw-in filters, warmups and
nd have been Hitech in cokin holders. My problem is that my filters are
taking up too much space in my bag. Is anyone using stack caps for their
filters. My thougth was to get stack caps for only the smallest and
Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
Afaik, FA-J means FA-Junior.
Read FAJ in reverse. ;-)
Oh, and what the plural could be ? FAJitas ?
cheers,
caveman
Somebody mentioned that it was a bit boring having lots
of shots of horses going over jumps
Well maybe not in those words! but yeah, that was me. I'll fess up.
well that's what the clients want to see!
Yeah, I realized that after I sent the email. I either re-read his email or
read a
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 08:01:43AM -0700, Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
Hello everybody,
I do already have a plane booked (one of those budget flights
without physical tickets...) but I'm feeling a bit in trouble
wrt renting a car on our arrival (at Stansted).
While browsing among the different
I've been using 58mm filters for almost all my lenses using
caps on the filters and three sizes of step rings. Bought
a Hoya adjustable 58mm hood as part of the kit. Works fine.
About the only ones I take with me are light warming, moose
polarizer, and regular polarizer. Not that difficult to
The caveman in me says that I should rent a Cadillac and go see an old
BW movie. Should be fun, at least for the retro feeling.
Treena wrote:
Believe it or not, yes - there's one in the next town over from us.
Hmmm... do some of those drive-in cinemas still exist there in yankee-land
?
For Sale:
Beautiful condition Asahi Pentax Auto-Bellows / slide copier with 100mm f4
Bellows takumar lens.
For screwmount. Double cable release, scales and booklet. $150
http://www.beard-redfern.com/photos/102_0271w.jpg
Wendy Beard,
Ottawa, Canada
http://www.beard-redfern.com
Hahaha! Nice! :)
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: K-mount again (was Re: More info on Tamron's new AF 28-75 f/2.8
Di
Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
Afaik, FA-J means FA-Junior.
Read
make sure that all your filter rings are externally readable as to which filter they
are. B+W filters do not have labels readable from the outside. you must look at them
from the front to distinguish them. also, it would not hurt to have something
permanently in your bag to grip and turn the
I read somewhere recently that last year was the first year in a long
time when there were more drive-ins built than torn down.
tv
-Original Message-
From: Caveman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Way OT: Gregory Peck
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not in my shop. (Sadly). Now that would be a coup. Or is it a coupe? I do
have some of Tim Page's gear here though. A 300mm F2.8 (that looks like it went
to the Vietnam conflict).
Coup - unless it is big enough to need wheels. Or
You won't, it's one sweet lens
Paul
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new toy
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:32:13 +0200
Hi,
my SMC-FA 35/2 has arrived. Nice small piece of glass, with rubber focusing
ring wider than
From: Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: K-mount again (was Re: More info on Tamron's new AF 28-75
f/2.8 Di
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 19:14:24 +0200
Afaik, FA-J means FA-Junior. It's quite strange to name your best lenses
Junior - that's why I really think that FA-J lenses will
I gotta say I've almost never had to use rubber, etc,
to remove aluminum front-lens attachments. You can almost
find a spot to squeeze a tad to get 'em off.
That being said, I _like_ plastic-mounted
front lens supplementaries.
They come off easier and are cheaper. They last well enough.
[EMAIL
Dave, maybe you could make your albums open in a new browser window so that
the user always have access to your home page. I noticed Welcome to
Groundline.com Is this going to be your new website?
Eventually it will be Wendy.I'm trying to do this
- Original Message -
From: Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: K-mount again (was Re: More info on Tamron's new AF 28-75 f/2.8
Di
There is still hope...
Yes, but the quest stands upon the edge of the knife:)
Regards
Artur
how much for 1?
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:57 PM
Subject: FS: 2 AF500FTZ's
Read the subject line. If interested, email me off list.
tv
Gang,
I got back from processing my first 6x7 chromes (which I took with a
borrowed camera) and oh well, now I want *my* 6x7 camera too.
For projection slides I will still use 35mm (much more convenient unless
I fork out $8000 for a Hasselblad projector), and I intend to use the
6x7 for
Marc,
An old Bell Howell slide cube projector or Kodak carosel will be just fine.
The slide cubes are easy to load and sort, carosels are less so.
The big images will amaze you.
The task of viewing more than 100 slides is daunting.
I would get a magnifying loop and a light box for sorting thru
Since you mentioned 35mm and US, Kodak is *the* obvious choice.
However, if you want to max the quality, you may want to take a look at
the Leitz Pradovit current series of projectors. Those Leica lenses are
really good.
A less obvious but good choice would be Kindermann (just avoid the basic
An old Bell Howell slide cube projector or Kodak carosel will be just
fine.
The slide cubes are easy to load and sort, carosels are less so.
The big images will amaze you.
Based on my experience years ago with two Bell and Howell slide cube
projectors, I would suggest that they be avoided.
If there was ever a bad time to offer a website IPO, I guess it would be now.
I've been waiting in the wings for the perfect time (okay, actually I've been
too busy to finish it)... but now I've been upstaged by not one, not two, but
*three* website debuts in the past 24 hours. But, foolishly,
- Original Message -
From: Roland Mabo
Subject: Re: Re[2]: K-mount again (was Re: More info on Tamron's new AF
28-75 f/2.8 Di
The problem is that it's not possible to make everyone happy. Pentax
has to
make a choice.
The perfect Pentax, is a SLR that can easily be converted to
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A side question.What material would be best to help cover a window,or
door frame for that
matter. I
have a piece of black foam board cut to fit my bathroom window but it
has a few tiny
leaks.I want to
place something over the frame to
On June 13, 2003 03:54 pm, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A side question.What material would be best to help cover a window,or
door frame for that
matter. I
have a piece of black foam board cut to fit my bathroom window but it
has a few tiny
jerome wrote:
http://www.exposedfilm.net
Comments, criticism, and the usual PDML banter are all welcomed.
- jerome
My favs are your people shots, especially these:
http://www.exposedfilm.net/g3_bwsig.htm
http://www.exposedfilm.net/g3_pit33.htm
also these look nice:
jerome wrote:
Comments, criticism, and the usual PDML banter are all welcomed.
- jerome
Damn, that's nice stuff!
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: Caveman
Subject: OT: Texas Leicas - which ?
Which 6x7 rangefinder camera would you recommend and why ?
Mamiya 7. Great lenses, excellent build quality.
That and I have actually used one and enjoyed it.
I am sure the Bronica is a good camera, but I don't
Absolutely excellent stuff, Jerome!
Thanks for sharing.
keith whaley
jerome wrote:
If there was ever a bad time to offer a website IPO, I guess it would be now.
I've been waiting in the wings for the perfect time (okay, actually I've been
too busy to finish it)... but now I've been upstaged
Caveman wrote:
jerome wrote:
http://www.exposedfilm.net
Comments, criticism, and the usual PDML banter are all welcomed.
- jerome
My favs are your people shots, especially these:
http://www.exposedfilm.net/g3_bwsig.htm
I agree!
This little guy looks ready to bop you
nice jerome.
I was impressed with Tiger on the green. What camera and lens? Was it
noisy? did they give you a hard time?
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: jerome [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 4:47 PM
Subject: Yet
One more question regarding this one:
http://www.exposedfilm.net/g1_00313.htm
How are the dragons housed in Atlanta? At the Natl. Zoo they are behind
glass which is exposed to the outdoors; i.e.: fogged, smeared, clouded and
scratched. I can never get a good shot of them due to the condition
After languishing in the repair shop for two months, because I couldn't
afford the repair, I finally got my Leica CL with Summicron C 40mm home
today. I am Happy vbg.
Yes, it's the one that I put up for sale last Friday. Now that I have
it in hand again, I'm reconsidering. I really can't bear
Dropping the 15f3.5 and the 28/f3.5 Shift after 30 years is no bad thing
(especially if one already has them:-). However, the question is, will
Pentax eventually present up-to-date successors? Or will there be no
Shift lens at all, and no lenses shorter than the 17-28 Fish-Eye Zoom
and the new
Can't be too many left of the old ones to tear down, can there?
-frank
tom wrote:
snipThe article mentioned that more were
built then torn down last year, which hasn't been the case in a while.
--
Thomas Van Veen Photography
www.thomasvanveen.com
301-758-3085
--
What a senseless waste
You want a Texas Leica? Why use a little baby 6x7?
Go for the big guy - Fuji 6x9! I think it's called the 690? Jeff here in
Toronto has a Fuji 6x9, and at least one (maybe two?) 6x7's (one's foldable,
but maybe he got rid of that one - you out there Jeff?).
AFAIK, he loves the 6x9! I've seen
w.r.t. http://www.exposedfilm.net
My favs are your people shots
It's funny. As much as I love animal stuff, I get way more comments on my
people stuff than anything else. And I tend to do people stuff only when I'm
tired of the animals... which is rare. Guess I need to venture out more.
Arnold Stark wrote:
Or will there be no
Shift lens at all, and no lenses shorter than the 17-28 Fish-Eye Zoom
and the new FA-J 18-35?
Very plausible. Anyone serious enough as to consider a shift lens is
thinking medium format or larger and not 35mm.
I can't believe that Pentax will leave its
Stephen Keith, thanks for the kind words.
Keith wrote:
http://www.exposedfilm.net/g3_bwsig.htm
I agree! This little guy looks ready to bop
you if you get any closer... g
Aren't grab shots the greatest. I couldn't reproduce that scene, let alone
the kids expression if I tried a thousand
Dropping the 15f3.5 and the 28/f3.5 Shift after 30 years is no bad thing
(especially if one already has them:-). However, the question is, will
Pentax eventually present up-to-date successors? Or will there be no Shift
lens at all, and no lenses shorter than the 17-28 Fish-Eye Zoom and the new
I love the one of Tiger chatting with his caddy! (Haven't looked at anything
else yet) It's a wonderful, relaxed, informal sort of shot (but look at the
intensity in Tiger's eyes - even for a practise round!).
Well done!
-frank
Christian Skofteland wrote:
nice jerome.
I was impressed with
Hi,
I am planning replace my existing tripd with corbon
fibre tripod, so was thinking about the ball heads.
I have few doubts about them.
Are there any advantages in using ballhead instead of
pan-tilt style ones?
Which is more stable?
Thanks
Ramesh
__
Do you
Unused in box, original Pentax soft case FG-SS, part number 32374
For MZ/ZX series (not MZ-S). Front of case detaches and can be replaced
with other size fronts. This has the size for a small zoom like 35-80
(hence the S)
Boz's Site has it listed under MZ-5(n)
$15 inc postage to anywhere.
Wendy
- Original Message -
From: Ramesh Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am planning replace my existing tripd with corbon
fibre tripod, so was thinking about the ball heads.
I have few doubts about them.
Are there any advantages in using ballhead instead of
pan-tilt style ones?
Which is
jerome wrote:
It's funny. As much as I love animal stuff, I get way more comments on my
people stuff than anything else. And I tend to do people stuff only when I'm
tired of the animals... which is rare. Guess I need to venture out more.
Thanks, by the way. Glad you like 'em.
Maybe that's your
Quoting Christian Skofteland:
I was impressed with Tiger on the green.
It's funny... you confused the hell outta me at first. I'm thinkin tiger? what
tiger? ain't no tiger on my website. There's a lion, but OH!!! You
obviously meant the tiger of the wooden persuasion. duh! forgot
Quoting frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I love the one of Tiger chatting with his caddy!
Thats one of my favs, too. Thanks, Frank.
It's a wonderful, relaxed, informal sort of shot
(but look at the intensity in Tiger's eyes - even for a
practise round!).
Yep, that's also what I like
Both are as stable as your tripod, the ball head is
just easier to position in general use, the pan tilt
head is more fersitile overall if speed and eye
polking doesn't bother you. I still havee my tilt head
and for archetectural use it's better due to the
bubble levels but for field use the ball
All the Drive-ins in one of the towns I grew up in (there were two in and
around Kitchener, Ontario, Canada) were torn down at least 20 years ago.
Too bad, because one of them was a lovely sort of Art Deco design.
Progress, I guess...
OTOH, here in Toronto, there's at least one that's been built
Maybe that's your strong point and you didn't know ;-)
I've heard those exact words before... but I guess I'm resistant
(pronounced stubborn). Besides, I don't wanna be no steenkin' Cotty.
He're a quick attempt at it, compare them to see:
original: http://www.exposedfilm.net/g2_06414.htm
jerome wrote:
Stephen Keith, thanks for the kind words.
Keith wrote:
http://www.exposedfilm.net/g3_bwsig.htm
I agree! This little guy looks ready to bop
you if you get any closer... g
Aren't grab shots the greatest. I couldn't reproduce that scene, let alone
the kids
Until now I've only been using polarizers as screw-in filters, warmups and
nd have been Hitech in cokin holders. My problem is that my filters are
taking up too much space in my bag. Is anyone using stack caps for their
filters. My thougth was to get stack caps for only the smallest and
Pentax now see Cosina as the brand to match.
This is not a such bad thing if you mean Voigtlander.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
jerome wrote:
Just peeked at the original, and your version is MUCH closer than mine.
THanks!!! Looks like it's time for a rescan some time this weekend. If you'd be
so kind, can you keep that photo up 'til monday. I'll probably reference it
again. Thanks again.
I'll keep it there. I presume
Afaik, FA-J means FA-Junior. It's quite strange to name your best lenses
Junior - that's why I really think that FA-J lenses will only be entry
level. ;)
There is still hope...
Was it FA-Joke or FA-Junk? If you are correct, I expect the good one will be
labelled FA-S (S for senior). :-)
Moastly, I do outdoor nature photography.
My biggest lens is Tamrom 300mm /2.8.
At present I use slik 700dxpro with pan-tilt.
Theoritically, moving sems to be easier in case of
ball head. I may stick to SLIK tripods. Max I could
spend on ballhead is 150usd.
Can I mix the brands? (say slik legs
Thank you, Dave. I have a pretty wide assortment of Pentax lenses, from the
excellent, but under-used 24 f2 to my longest, a 600 f5.6. Most used for
wildlife is a 300 F* f4.5. For BW, I like my 35mm f2, or 75-150 f4 (M).
It's really a thrill to (finally) put things up for people to see, scary,
Here's a session with one of the models:
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/SLY2003/8657.JPG
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/SLY2003/8665.JPG
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/SLY2003/8678.JPG
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/SLY2003/8701.JPG
Yeah, sorry, it's a guy.The first session I did was with a girl, but
it didn't
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 14:06:52 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Eriksson wrote:
Is anyone using stack caps for their filters.
If you're in a hurry, unscrewing the filter you want from the
middle of its size-section then unscrewing the step-up ring
you need is a bother.
Yep. I tried it
If you don't Tom..
I WILL ;-)
Smirkingly,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 7:50 PM
To: pdml
Subject: Show Pics
snip
I think I'll call her and see if she wants to have another go.
/snip
No, I wasn't thinking that, I was thinking in terms of, used camera, who
knows what has be done to it.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: My
Try a wide rubber band in place of a filter wrench..
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: Filter storage
snip, snip
it would not hurt to have something permanently in
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
