I've had a Disco Td5 (aut.) for a year now and
I just love her! ;-)
Antti-Pekka
Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Estera Oy Turku
www.estera.fi
www.computec.fi
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Land Rovers are my vehicle of
On 18/4/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
The Haliburtons are way overrated unless you lust for James Bond status. The
Pelicans and UK (Underwater Kinetics which I prefer and I have both brands)
cases are and should remain excellent, all the old models are still
available
and they
On 18/4/05, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
So, how do you like your Ford, Cotty (grin)?
Ain't no damn Ford badge on my motor, tosh!
The new ones have Jaguar motors, though.
(The old ones use a Buick).
You're talking about the V8s - I have a 2.5 litre four cylinder diesel
that is
Cotty, the Td5 is five cylinder, right? (to correct your typo ;-)
Btw, ain't the Td5 a BMW design (or maybe it is a Land Rover design
from the BMW time)?
Antti-Pekka
Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Estera Oy Turku
www.estera.fi
www.computec.fi
-Original
Hi,
Sunday, April 17, 2005, 11:53:32 PM, John wrote:
How exactly do we know what people (who have left no written record)
thought about psychology a million or so years ago?
These palaeontologists are clever chaps to have worked all this out. Or
highly imaginitive.
I think in this case
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 17 Apr 2005 at 21:02, mike wilson wrote:
You won't need to, because they just will not come back. Most of the
people I know who have digital cameras print less than 1% of their
pictures. Once the new model sales dry up - as they will, because most
people are happy
Hi,
The most shocking part of your report, Bob, is that you'd actually buy
and eat fish fingers. LOL
I put that part in for fictional effect, Frank. Don't worry.
--
Cheers,
Bob
frank theriault wrote:
On 4/17/05, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not immigrants, and it's not even historically oppressed
countries necessarily. Over here in the UK people seem ready to roll
over and give in without a murmur on matters such as ID cards and
imprisonment without charge and
Cotty wrote:
On 18/4/05, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
So, how do you like your Ford, Cotty (grin)?
Ain't no damn Ford badge on my motor, tosh!
The new ones have Jaguar motors, though.
(The old ones use a Buick).
You're talking about the V8s - I have a 2.5 litre four cylinder diesel
Hi Frank ...
Didn't see the original post.
I'm of mixed feelings about this one. My first comment is that the
tonality is awful and really needs to be less contrasty and show some more
detail, which I know is within the photo.
I like the statement made by the background. However, not showing
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Frank ...
Didn't see the original post.
I'm of mixed feelings about this one. My first comment is that the
tonality is awful and really needs to be less contrasty and show some more
detail, which I know is within the photo.
I like the statement made by the background.
It is Pentax's first, and aborted, attempt at K mount auto-focus. It only
auto-focuses with the ME-F body. Bob Blakely has/had one, and is not
hugely impressed.
John
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 21:40:28 -0700, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok, I haven't been reading this thread, so please
Well, that's fair enuf ... constructive criticism and a compliment. Those
broad shoulders of which you speak are nothing more than padding ;-))
You're right in that I didn't work on this nearly as much as I've worked on
others, perhaps because I didn't care for it as much as some other photos.
Yeah, a tripod. Hand holding with that 1200mm POV is pretty tough
without going to ISO 800. And even then, it's hit and miss.
On Apr 17, 2005, at 11:38 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On 4/17/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3288907
Excellent!
Geez, even
Hi Boris,
No I don't have a ball head. I have a three-way Bogen 3047 head. If I
leave the handles medium tight it allows almost as much freedom of
movement as a ball head. It's very smooth and works well for just about
everything I do. I don't think the bad bokeh is a function of the
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:13:28 +0100, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Japan is a free market, and their economy hasn't grown for years. I
haven't heard anyone say it has collapsed, though. No Japanese are
starving, and they haven't declared war.
If you want to see a free-market
Hi Frank,
I missed this the first time through as well. I like the crop and the
pose. It's an interesting shot of an interesting person. However, I'm
not very fond of the direct flash effect. Was the ceiling low enough
for a bounce here? That might serve you better.
On Apr 18, 2005, at 5:13 AM,
Mike, the US gallon is smaller than the Imperial gallon.
90p a litre equates to US$6.47 per US gallon, or £4.10 per Imp gallon.
John
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:31:02 +0100, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 18/4/05, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
So, how do you like
I like the picture. I think the physical background provides a
metaphorical background which helps to explain the person she is (or at
least that is what it suggests to me).
I don't mind her looking down. She looks as though she is considering
something, and will look up in a moment with
On Apr 18, 2005, at 5:25 AM, Bob W wrote:
It's not immigrants, and it's not even historically oppressed
countries necessarily. Over here in the UK people seem ready to roll
over and give in without a murmur on matters such as ID cards and
imprisonment without charge and without trial.
How will the
Hi Boris,
sorry for the late reply. No, no reflectors or else. It was early
in the morning within the shadow of a hill.
Best regards, Hans.
Hi all,
was for long not present but I'm back. What do you think of this
one:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3278186
Best
Hi all,
I tried to improve this picture by increasing the DOF using
a selfmade deblur tool. Also changed the color a little bit.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3290292
The old one can be found in the macro folder. What is your
opinion?
Thanks and best regards, Hans.
I really
I just came home, with all cards full of models from a fashion show...
Pfew they look all the same to me after three thousand shots ;-) I
don't want to see a scantilly clothed fashion model again in my lifetime
(well maybe for a few weeks at least)... now comes the worst part -
editing...
Good
Please ignore...
Frantisek
On 4/13/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Hans Imglueck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/13 Wed PM 02:27:32 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Back with ladybug
Hi all,
was for long not present but I'm back. What do you think of this
one:
OK
On 4/16/05, Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please ignore...
Frantisek
On 4/18/05, Hans Imglueck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to improve this picture by increasing the DOF using
a selfmade deblur tool. Also changed the color a little bit.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3290292
The old one can be found in the macro folder. What is
On 4/18/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, a tripod. Hand holding with that 1200mm POV is pretty tough
without going to ISO 800. And even then, it's hit and miss.
Okay. You're allowed once in a while, on real long lenses.
We just don't want to change your nickname to Shakey.
On 4/18/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank,
I missed this the first time through as well. I like the crop and the
pose. It's an interesting shot of an interesting person. However, I'm
not very fond of the direct flash effect. Was the ceiling low enough
for a bounce here?
Gee life's rough sometimes isn't it?
g
Dave S
On 4/18/05, Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just came home, with all cards full of models from a fashion show...
Pfew they look all the same to me after three thousand shots ;-) I
don't want to see a scantilly clothed fashion model again in
On 4/18/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank ...
Didn't see the original post.
I'm of mixed feelings about this one. My first comment is that the
tonality is awful and really needs to be less contrasty and show some more
detail, which I know is within the photo.
You
On 4/18/05, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I quite like the ambiguity. Classic teenage angst.
I think she may be in her early/mid 20's - not that she can't still
have teenage angst at that age g.
Wanting to belong
and yet to be different. Confident but unsure. It highlights, for
On 4/18/05, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the picture. I think the physical background provides a
metaphorical background which helps to explain the person she is (or at
least that is what it suggests to me).
I don't mind her looking down. She looks as though she is
On 4/17/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know, at the rate people around here upgrade mobile phones for little
perceived or actual value it makes me wonder if people now (with too much
disposable cash) don't expect to continuously upgrade be it advantageous or
not.
The
On 4/17/05, Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I was 9 yo my father followed my mother's advice (probably
first and last time...) and bought a 2nd hand Lancia Beta saloon
(almost brand new, I guess it was less than 2 years old). A
great car, very comfortable, and with that nice
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:56:33 -0400, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No social pressures? Maybe, but there's PDML peer pressure, and that's
much worse!
Having decided I must stop buying things off Ebay, I've just noticed an
SMCP . I don't know how I'll live if I don't buy it.
There are 2 A35-70s.
A 3.5-4.5 that I've seen go for as little as $25.00,
it's a very decent lens.
The other is the A35-70/4, it's a fantastic little
zoom and I've seen them offered for as much as $125.00,
I paid a little over $40.00 for mine a few years ago.
The A 35-70/4 is a neat little
A few years ago I spent a few nights up in Michigan's upper peninsula, and
work mostly out of a kit consisting of an LX, the A 28-135, Vivitar Series 1
19-35, Tokina 100-300 f4 (constant aperture) and A 50 f1.4.
All of the above lenses, Mark, except for the VS1 19-35, are among my
workhorse
It is Pentax's first, and aborted, attempt at K mount auto-focus. It only
auto-focuses with the ME-F body. Bob Blakely has/had one, and is not
hugely impressed.
It actually tested quite well in Modern Photo back when it came out (early
1980's) along with the ME-F. I think it's a decent
On 4/17/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saw this as I was driving by a most unusual shop filled with odd antiques
and old movie props and paraphernalia. This was leaning against a wall in
the shop driveway, and I immediately turned around, parked the car, and
grabbed a couple of
On 4/17/05, Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just came home, with all cards full of models from a fashion show...
Pfew they look all the same to me after three thousand shots ;-) I
don't want to see a scantilly clothed fashion model again in my lifetime
(well maybe for a few weeks at
Frank,
Interesting 'do'. I feel that the sort of stark
lighting ads some tension that's appropriate for this
image.
The faint Mona Lisa grin hints at her feeling of
success with her 'look'.
Jack
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given the circumstances I like the lighting as well. The direct flash does give
you that fifties Speed Graphic look. That's a good thing at times.
On 4/18/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank,
I missed this the first time through as well. I like the crop and the
pose.
But the auto-focus motor is in the lens, and it does not use up the camera
batteries. Come on, now, you can not have it both ways, if it is good enough
for Canon (grin)...
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Fred wrote:
It is
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 17:51:39 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WARNING:
Open if you like horses.If you don't move on.vbg
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paecwinter/index.htm
My first Breezebrowser html webpage attempt.
I like what it does and has potential to
Since it is usually cheaper here in the US to get a new cel-phone than to buy a
new battery for it we do it about every two years.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Rob Studdert wrote:
I don't know, at the rate people around here
On 4/17/05, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/9659641/
Do horses sleep this way?
With their eyes closed?
Yes.
g
Nice shot.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 4/18/05, Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since it is usually cheaper here in the US to get a new cel-phone than to buy
a new battery for it we do it about every two years.
Tom,
It's also the way they're marketed.
Here, most plans extend over a year or two, and the base phone is
often
That is not the Free Market model, it is the MBA mentality fomented by those nice Ivy League Colleges in the NE US.
Send you kids to Yale, destroy your business in ten-twenty years; you know, the
one you spent 50 building from nothing. Your stock will soar until suddenly
your stock holders
This one time, at band camp, Tan and Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, David! You're a legend!! Thanks so much for your support!! I'll shout
you a beer when we come to WA! ;)
Hi Tan,
I know these fund raisers are difficult to promote, but I dont know whether
you came through my town or
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Fred wrote:
the five VS1 70-210's.) (Another possible example - some claim that the F
70-210/4-5.6 is better than the A 70-210/4, although I have not found that
to be the case with the F that I have tried.)
Not been around too long (couple of years?) but I haven't quite
Salgado is for me the best current photographer. The audio in
that link is excellent - when he speaks about Salgado passing on the
events on TienAnMen square in 1989 to continue photographing bicycle
workers in some chinese factory for his Workers series (which _is_
excellent)...
I've used the Fred Miranda Digital Infrared action and
found it to be quite pleasing.
This was taken in August so the foliage is a little
bit over the top, but I quite like it
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/41746632
Spring is usually a good time to shoot IR so I might
give it a try again
Because of the ED element, yes, I think I've read that from a few
people, the F 70-210 had an edge over the A (but not by much).
Joe
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Fred wrote:
the five VS1 70-210's.) (Another possible example - some claim that the F
70-210/4-5.6 is better than the A 70-210/4, although
This is the extreme case but yes, 3 dollars is a reasonable price if you
manage to sell million copies and not have to provide
any support after the sale and if your profit on each copy is 50%.
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
John Forbes wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:13:28 +0100, mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Japan is a free market, and their economy hasn't grown for years. I
haven't heard anyone say it has collapsed, though. No Japanese are
starving, and they haven't declared war.
Japan is a free
But the auto-focus motor is in the lens, and it does not use up the
camera batteries. Come on, now, you can not have it both ways, if it is
good enough for Canon (grin)...
Yeah, yeah, I know... vbg
For manual focus, though, the AF 35-70/2.8, um, well, er, ~stinks~ (g).
You also have to
John Forbes wrote:
Mike, the US gallon is smaller than the Imperial gallon.
90p a litre equates to US$6.47 per US gallon, or £4.10 per Imp gallon.
As he was talking about Land Rovers, I assumed Imperial.
John
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:31:02 +0100, mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty wrote:
the five VS1 70-210's.) (Another possible example -some claim that the
F 70-210/4-5.6 is better than the A 70-210/4, although I have not found
that to be the case with the F that I have tried.)
Not been around too long (couple of years?) but I haven't quite read
this. Except if the claim is
frank theriault wrote:
On 4/13/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Hans Imglueck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/13 Wed PM 02:27:32 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Back with ladybug
Hi all,
was for long not present but I'm back. What do you think of this
one:
Many thanks to all who replied - the overwhelming positive feedback re
Peli cases was enough for me to place an order. I'm having the new 1510
Carry On Kenneth Williams Oh matro!!/Kenneth Williams with
padded dividers.
Incidentally, my local shop is Morris Photo in Oxford, who are a
Fred wrote:
FA* 865/1.4
OK, I'm sitting down. How much?
Do you get a free Charles Atlas course with it, or do you have to rent a
sherpa?
8-)
mike
Pfew they look all the same to me after three thousand shots ;-) I
don't want to see a scantilly clothed fashion model again in my lifetime
(well maybe for a few weeks at least)... now comes the worst part -
editing...
Good light!
fra
ft Poor baby!
Recuperating over few
FA* 865/1.4
OK, I'm sitting down. How much?
HAR !!!
If you have to ask, you can't afford it. g
Do you get a free Charles Atlas course with it, or do you have to rent a
sherpa?
Actually, instead of a Sherpa, I rented BigFoot.
Actually, you can tell from the FL that it's the latest in
On 18/4/05, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
How will the other EEC countries feel about having to carry identity
papers? Won't they resist too?
The Germans will love it, the French will ignore it, the Italians and
Irish will be too chaotic to enforce it. Only the British will resent
On 18/4/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Given the circumstances I like the lighting as well. The direct flash
does give you that fifties Speed Graphic look. That's a good thing at
times.
Paul you read my mind. Given that, it works nicely for me. Good job Frank.
Cheers,
On 17/4/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
That is pretty funny about the endoscopes, though. I hear Olympus has
cornered the market over the last number of years, so maybe this is
Pentax's attempt to once again penetrate the hole market.
Reliability is an issue, they've often
On 18/4/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.home.aone.net.au/audiobias/temp/IMGP2236m.jpg
Rob, you are such a Vulcan when it comes to pics of audio things!
Take it as a compliment ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 18/4/05, Frantisek, discombobulated, unleashed:
I just came home, with all cards full of models from a fashion show...
Pfew they look all the same to me after three thousand shots ;-) I
don't want to see a scantilly clothed fashion model again in my lifetime
(well maybe for a few weeks at
Olympus was apparently smart enough to work the other end of the market with
some photographic tools for gastro endoscopy. In hindsight, it looks like
Pentax's approach was too anal.
On 17/4/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
That is pretty funny about the endoscopes, though.
On Apr 17, 2005, at 3:04 PM, Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
Wooohooo!!
A Lancia fan!
:-)
Yessir. I lusted after a Lancia Fulvia Zagato Coupé for years, it was
parked in front of a house on the way to the train station every time I
passed. The day it disappeared I was heartbroken ... only to
It's reasonable quality glass but nothing to write home about. The motor,
servo batteries, and consequently the all the gearing is in the lens, so
it's bulky and feels funny in the hand. Quick manual focusing is out of the
question as you will be turning (and feeling and hearing) all the
Delightfully surreal, Shel. :-)
Godfrey
On Apr 16, 2005, at 9:44 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Saw this as I was driving by a most unusual shop filled with odd
antiques
and old movie props and paraphernalia. This was leaning against a
wall in
the shop driveway, and I immediately turned around,
While it still appears on the Pentax USA website, the SMC Pentax-FA
135mm f/2.8 (IF) has disappeared from BH, and from Adorama's websites.
Has yet another beautiful Pentax lens been discontinued before I got
my hands on one?
On Apr 17, 2005, at 10:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paecwinter/index.htm
My first Breezebrowser html webpage attempt.
I like what it does and has potential to do,just gotta fiqure it out.
The pages look fine.
If I might make a suggestion or two on the photos ...
Adobe is buying Macromedia (pending appropriate approvals, of course)
Here is information about released by both Adobe and Macromedia:
http://www.macromedia.com/macromedia/proom/pr/2005/adobe_macromedia.html
http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/invrelations/adobeandmacromedia.html
On Apr 18, 2005, at 7:11 AM, wendy beard wrote:
I've used the Fred Miranda Digital Infrared action and
found it to be quite pleasing.
I've never quite understood this. An action which simulates IR is kinda
weird ... you're not seeing IR light, which is the whole point of IR
photography.
Godfrey
uag
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: Pentax advertising
On 17/4/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
That is pretty funny about the endoscopes, though. I hear
Monday, April 18, 2005, 5:55:59 PM, Bob wrote:
BB It's reasonable quality glass but nothing to write home about. The motor,
BB servo batteries, and consequently the all the gearing is in the lens, so
BB it's bulky and feels funny in the hand. Quick manual focusing is out of the
BB question as you
On 18/4/05, Antti-Pekka Virjonen, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, the Td5 is five cylinder, right? (to correct your typo ;-)
Btw, ain't the Td5 a BMW design (or maybe it is a Land Rover design
from the BMW time)?
You are entirely correct A-P, the Td5 is a 5 cylinder diesel. It resides
in the
On 18/4/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
When did you last buy fuel? It's just under 90p a litre up here, which
translates to much closer to £5 per gallon in my book. 8-) I suspect
double that is not so far away 8-((
D'oh! Pardon me. Brain fart. Yeah, £5.
Cheers,
Cotty
On 18/4/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
90p a litre equates to US$6.47 per US gallon, or £4.10 per Imp gallon.
Look, you guys slug it out - I'm going to lie down for a bit.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
if you like to admire your pics while you motor along
http://theradblog.typepad.com/theradblog/2005/03/mac_mini_in_a_l.html
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 16/4/05, Tan and Steve, discombobulated, unleashed:
The site can be found here:
www.headwindsanddreams.com
Thanks for looking and for your support, we can't wait to hear your
comments!!
Good luck darlin, I've put some lolly in yer billabong. Take plenty of
pics along the way. Nothing
Adobe is maybe the only mega-corporation I like.
Basically because they make excellent, top rate stuff.
Macromedia products are excellent, so I suppose
they'll become even better.
Adobe is going to be the Canon of imaging software...
Regards
Albano
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 18, 2005, at 7:11 AM, wendy beard wrote:
I've used the Fred Miranda Digital Infrared action
and
found it to be quite pleasing.
I've never quite understood this. An action which
simulates IR is kinda
weird ... you're not seeing IR
In their market, I think Adobe is much more powerful than Canon is in
their market(s). Look at the price of PS CS and tell me Adobe has any
significant competition. That said, I must admit that unlike other
companies in their position (Micro$oft), at least Adobe's products don't
suck.
Glenn
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- I realize that you've got a lot of horses and a
lot of different
owners who might want a similar photo of their horse
so the set as a
whole has to be somewhat repetitious as a series of
record shots, but
I think you should try varying the
On Apr 18, 2005, at 10:33 AM, wendy beard wrote:
I run into a similar problem when shooting dogsports.
Usually you have to camp in one spot for an event and
the competitors like to see their dog doing a certain
obstacle. Tyre shots are a particular favourite. It's
pretty boring wading through a
Fred wrote:
There are 2 A35-70s.
A 3.5-4.5 that I've seen go for as little as $25.00,
it's a very decent lens.
The other is the A35-70/4, it's a fantastic little
zoom and I've seen them offered for as much as $125.00,
I paid a little over $40.00 for mine a few years ago.
I paid a little more than
Hi,
We'll do nothing now, but we'll remember these words in about five years
time. 1929 will seem like a mild hiccup.
That's convenient timing. It'll be seen as Pres. H. Clinton's fault.
--
Cheers,
Bob
- Original Message -
From: David Zaninovic Subject: Re: Capture One Pro vs Adobe RAW converter
This is the extreme case but yes, 3 dollars is a reasonable price if
you manage to sell million copies and not have to provide
any support after the sale and if your profit on each copy is
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault Subject: Re: Hurrah for Shel Disrobing the Emperor
DSLR's are an awful lot more than a couple of hundred, especially if
one is upgrading from entry-level. Plus, there simply aren't the
social pressures to get the latest and greatest features.
For your pleasure:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/16.htm
Comments and critique always appreciated.
enjoy,
Godfrey
Yup.
Not sure whether PM Brown will have the luxury of blaming his economic
disasters on somebody else though.
John
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:58:51 +0100, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We'll do nothing now, but we'll remember these words in about five years
time. 1929 will seem like a mild
Cotty wrote:
On 16/4/05, Tan and Steve, discombobulated, unleashed:
The site can be found here:
www.headwindsanddreams.com
Thanks for looking and for your support, we can't wait to hear your
comments!!
Good luck darlin, I've put some lolly in yer billabong. Take plenty of
pics along the way.
Glad to read your results, cause I ordered the lens three days ago...
Cant't wait to have it on my cam for allround use and with a pocket-able
size!
Good one. The woman appears to be covering her mouth so that the photographer
can't read her lips. I like the bright backlight with this type of shot, and
the position of the two figures makes for a nice composition.
For your pleasure:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/16.htm
It looks like a very slick ad for what it really
is
I LIKE the white line on top - as a balance to the
white field
But agree with Don about the reflection where the
um... cup goes.
ann
(don't have time either)
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 17 Apr 2005 at 20:49, Don Sanderson wrote:
Hey,
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Fred wrote:
Not having had much autofocus experience, I've often wondered about the
plusses and minuses of putting the motor in the body vs in the lens,
batteries in the body vs the lens, etc. I've also wondered about the
power zoom functionality (the huge contacts on
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
