Kind of like keeping your negs off premises ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Savage
Admittedly the same would happen with digital, but if you were to take
your archiving seriously, you'd either use some sort of automatic
online archive service or keep copies off your premises.
Yep. But what if the off premises location burns down.
g
How's that for a circular argument.
Dave :-)
On 7/31/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kind of like keeping your negs off premises ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
Wrom: UNNYCGPKYLEJ
Admittedly the same would
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: Backing Up and Storing Files
True. But if a neg is damaged or lost then it's gone for good. ;-)
I quite often think, when I hear news reports of house fires where the
occupants get out unhurt but everything is lost, that if I
Actually it does, just not the same kind...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: David Savage Subject: Re: Backing
Up and Storing Files
Just like film eh?
The nice thing about film is that it doesn't require back ups.
William Robb
--
When you're worried or in
This one time, at band camp, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31 Jul 2005 at 12:51, Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. The chances of all of your DVDs or
CDs being wiped out are somewhere between zero and none.
On 30/7/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I am wondering what the big lens owners are using to support their large
sized glass?
Piles of money and a whole stack of excuses. She still gives me a hard
time ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
Hi Boris
maybe the Tamron looses a bit of sharpness in the edges which I would
consider normal or otherwise it was just me
or the card making process :-)
Which leads me to a question too:
Would you (not only you Boris) always correct perspective distortion on
photos made with a wide lens like on
Hi Paul
thanks for the nice comment.
Would you always correct perspective distortion in such a shot if possible
or do you find it acceptable or even pleasing
this way?
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2005 4:15 AM
On Jul 31, 2005, at 4:48 PM, William Robb wrote:
I am wondering what the big lens owners are using to support their
large sized glass?
I am interested in the advantages and disadvantages of the various
heads out there capable of supporting a super telephoto in the 3.3
kilogram range.
David Mann wrote:
I've used my partner's head to support a 400mm lens. She's a
foot shorter than I am so it made for quite a comfortable
shooting position. More of a bipod than a tripod but still
better than handheld, and she can carry a bag of gear up a hill.
I bet she's hoping you
Hi People...
Does anybody here ever built himself a film drying drawer ?
how did you do that?
do you have any scheme ?
Thanks in advance
Michael
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, David Mann wrote:
lens is a bit ugly :) I use the Z-1p also for macro but it really does need
an electronic DOF preview when the lens is set to A.
The first Pentax with a really useful DOF preview was the -5n. There
are two aspects to electronic DOF preview; that it
On 31/7/05, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've used my partner's head to support a 400mm lens. She's a foot
shorter than I am so it made for quite a comfortable shooting
position. More of a bipod than a tripod but still better than
handheld, and she can carry a bag of gear up a
I'm considering keeping half of my negs at remote location.
Something, like every other years collection 2000, 2002, 2004 remote and
2001, 2003, 2005 locally.
Just in case...
Of course, after i get time and scan all those negs :)
Gasha
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Kind of like keeping your negs
Why would you unplug one drive and plug in the other? Why not leave
them both plugged in?
Paul
On Jul 31, 2005, at 1:01 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The most cost-efficient and reliable backup storage at present is a
pair external FireWire/USB 2.0 drives. Buy two, set them up
identically. When
William Robb wrote:
Hi;
I am wondering what the big lens owners are using to support their large
sized glass?
I am interested in the advantages and disadvantages of the various heads
out there capable of supporting a super telephoto in the 3.3 kilogram
range.
I use the Bogen 3421 head:
William Robb wrote:
The nice thing about film is that it doesn't require back ups.
That's just one nice thing about film. There are plenty of others. G
Tom Reese
I think a gimbal head is almost a necessity for a lens of that size.
Ken has researched this quite thoroughly, and I'm sure he'll weigh in
on it.
Paul
On Jul 31, 2005, at 7:50 AM, Tom Reese wrote:
William Robb wrote:
Hi;
I am wondering what the big lens owners are using to support their
Hi Paul ... while I can't speak for Godfrey, here are a couple of thoughts:
the computer doesn't have sufficient USB/Firewire connections to keep them
both plugged in; by removing one it's not susceptible to the electronic and
mechanical glitches that can fry a drive; unplugged means it's not
Willima wrote:
I am wondering what the big lens owners are using to support their large sized
glass? I am interested in the advantages and disadvantages of the various heads
out there capable of supporting a super telephoto in the 3.3 kilogram range.
REPLY:
The lens isn't that heavy (the
Yeah, well, TMAX sucks anyway. My first, and last, roll of TMAX
required fixing twice. And the fixer was shot afterwards. So screw
it. Tri-X is just fine. But thanks for the insight, Bill. I was
wondering about your TMAX statement as well.
On 7/31/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote:
Some use gimbal heads as well, like the Wimberley. Both a video and a gimball
head force you to level the tripod in order to work most effectively. A
fluid video head could be something to consider if you will use the lens with
converters a lot.
Let me just add that neither a ball
David,
I much prefer your version to mine.
I envy your PS eye.
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day Bruce,
I generally don't do this unless asked or invited,
but since everyone
else is posting there BW versions I'll add mine:
http://tinyurl.com/7waf2
Chanel mixer
The lens isn't that heavy (the FA* 600/4 weights more than twice as much)
so a sturdy ball head or pan/tilt head should be able to do the job. You
have to decide if you want something that is the ultimate in stability
(pan/tilt - video head) or if you want something that can be pointed in
either one of the two Wimberley heads or Kirk King Cobra, an appropriate
quick release clamp, and a suitable lens plate for the lens. you will
probably have to go with a Wimberley P50. conventional ball or pan head may
be able to handle the weight, but you won't be able to aim it quickly.
Looks like nobody getting my emails to the list...
if anyone see this - please respond...
Michael
Nope. Sorry. Didn't see it. g
On 7/31/05, Michael Spivak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like nobody getting my emails to the list...
if anyone see this - please respond...
Michael
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
--
You have to hold the button down -Arnold Newman
Thanks for the input, Mark.
On 7/30/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm considering
purchasing a 67. I'll have to liquidate the C220, both of it's
lenses, and probably the Crown Graphic to do so. KEH has a few
outfits consisting of the
On 7/30/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've bought a couple of Bargain items from KEH. Most other places would
grade the EX.
Imagine that - an honest business. I occasionally browse through
antique shops and flea markets, and am constantly amazed at what
passes for mint
Thanks, Doug.
On 7/30/05, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:44:30 -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
Does anyone have any experience buying bargain items from
KEH?
I've had very good experiences buying their bargain items. In every
case I can recall, the glass
On 7/30/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consider selling the baby, They fetch good money..
Espcially girl babies.
Well, we're having a girl. I passed on your sentiments to my wife. I
even embellished a bit and told her that we could each have a NEW 67ii
along with a handful
Thanks, Mishka. I'll keep that in mind.
On 7/30/05, Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have bought a few EX items from KEH, and i wouldn't
go below that.
mishka
On 7/30/05, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy, gang!
Recently, my wife effectively reduced my fun money fund
The dual-drive scheme is fine. Dump stuff onto both as you use them,
and use a catalog application so you know what's there when they're
off-line. CD-R and DVD-R are definitely backup-backup storage for
me ... I don't do them for everything and am just as haphazard about
filing/organizing
On Jul 30, 2005, at 10:32 PM, William Robb wrote:
Just like film eh?
The nice thing about film is that it doesn't require back ups.
The bad thing about film is that it cannot be backed up. Once it
deteriorates, it's gone forever.
Godfrey
On 7/30/05, E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
KEH has what looks to be a very reasonable return policy, but I've never
actually tried to return anything so I only know about it in theory, as
it were.
On 7/30/05, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I'd say their quality control leaves
On Jul 31, 2005, at 4:16 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Why would you unplug one drive and plug in the other? Why not leave
them both plugged in?
Protection against power spikes, static electrical discharge and
inadvertent errors. FireWire is plug'n'play ... I keep the archive
drives put
Here's a little trick:
Buy a camera you don't want. Let her see it. Make sure she
understands that you really got a good deal. Leave it in plain sight
for a while. Talk about it a lot. Pretend you like it. Then sell
it. Now you've got ammunition. Remember the whatsinwhosit that I
really
Thanks. Mine, too!
On 7/30/05, Gasha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
KEH bargain is OK!
I would like to say, that all my photo equipment will get this condition
sooner or later. New or used :)
I take care of all of my cameras, but use them every weekend.
Gasha, with bargain P645 from KEH
On Jul 31, 2005, at 5:05 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
the computer doesn't have sufficient USB/Firewire connections to
keep them
both plugged in;
FireWire devices daisy chain up to 64 units on a port, so that's not
a problem. I might not have enough cables, however. ;-)
by removing one
Surpluss Gym. Locker...
Michael Spivak wrote:
Hi People...
Does anybody here ever built himself a film drying drawer ?
how did you do that?
do you have any scheme ?
Thanks in advance
Michael
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
It got to me. The list is very quiet though...
Michael Spivak wrote:
Looks like nobody getting my emails to the list...
if anyone see this - please respond...
Michael
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
Neither did I
Dave
On 7/31/05, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope. Sorry. Didn't see it. g
On 7/31/05, Michael Spivak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like nobody getting my emails to the list...
if anyone see this - please respond...
Michael
--
Scott Loveless
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Scott Loveless wrote:
wouldn't really enjoy the brand new 67ii after she gouged out both of
my eyes. Such is life.
Eyes? That's a bargain, Scott.
Kostas
Your voice is weakly coming through the wires...
--
Boris
Thanks Jack, the credit has to go to Bruce for capturing the scene though. :-)
Dave
On 7/31/05, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
I much prefer your version to mine.
I envy your PS eye.
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day Bruce,
I generally don't do
- Original Message -
From: Michael Spivak
Subject: OT - Drying films
Hi People...
Does anybody here ever built himself a film drying drawer ?
how did you do that?
do you have any scheme ?
Get a clothes storage bag and hang em in it.
Put a folded up towel on the bottom to catch
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Re: Pentax 67
Otherwise, make sure you are buying a body with mirror lock up.
I don't foresee myself using the MLU that much. Actually, I'll
probably hand hold the camera most of the time. Are parts for the
older non-MLU
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Tripod heads
I am wondering what the big lens owners are using to support their large
sized glass?
Piles of money and a whole stack of excuses. She still gives me a hard
time ;-)
I use my right arm, until it gets tired, then I
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: Backing Up and Storing Files
Actually it does, just not the same kind...
None of my negs have back-ups, and I haven't lost a single one yet to
disaster, in over 35 years of shooting.
OTOH, I have had 3 HD failures in the past 7
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: Backing Up and Storing Files
On Jul 30, 2005, at 10:32 PM, William Robb wrote:
Just like film eh?
The nice thing about film is that it doesn't require back ups.
The bad thing about film is that it cannot be backed up.
What about blowing some air in ? it won't work unfortunately...
but i've found something interesting on the net... i think i will go for it...
http://www.bonavolta.ch/hobby/en/photo/fdryer.htm#V2
Michael
On 7/31/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From:
- Original Message -
From: Fred
Subject: Re: Tripod heads
I have used the Novoflex Magic Ball head (not the Mini Ball, of
course)
quite successfully with the exact same lens as Bill just picked up (his A*
600/5.6). The action is quite smooth (almost buttery), and the
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese
Subject: Re: Tripod heads
I use the Bogen 3421 head:
http://www.adorama.com/BG3421.html?searchinfo=bogen%203421item_no=2
It allows for easy tracking of a moving subject and works well. It's
quite a bit cheaper than the Wimberleys.
Thanks
Thanks Pål.
bill
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: Tripod heads
REPLY:
The lens isn't that heavy (the FA* 600/4 weights more than twice as much)
I can't remember who suggested it to me, but I used to hang my film in
the shower. Run the hot water for a while with the door closed
extraction fan off, let the steam build up a little, (to help settle
any dust) wait for the steam to clear then hang the film up.
I had more problems with dusty /
I've had a quick peek at the Wimberley, and at the Manfrotto geared heads.
I like the looks of the Wimberley a lot, but I am drawn a bit to the geared
head, as it can be used with my 4x5.
This is handy, since I will likely be using the big lens on my Zone VI
tripod, since it is the most
- Original Message -
From: Michael Spivak
Subject: Re: OT - Drying films
What about blowing some air in ? it won't work unfortunately...
but i've found something interesting on the net... i think i will go for
it...
http://www.bonavolta.ch/hobby/en/photo/fdryer.htm#V2
I've
Hmmm. I leave both of my externals plugged in. Even if you have only
one firewire connection, adding more is simple enough. I think moving
drives is probably harder on them than letting them spin. But as I
said, I back up everything on at least one set of DVD as well as on a
drive.
Paul
On
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: OT - Drying films
I can't remember who suggested it to me, but I used to hang my film in
the shower. Run the hot water for a while with the door closed
extraction fan off, let the steam build up a little, (to help settle
any
Someone on the list mentioned this a few months back. Works great.
Been doing it ever since.
On 7/31/05, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't remember who suggested it to me, but I used to hang my film in
the shower. Run the hot water for a while with the door closed
extraction fan
For those who don't recall...
I have an M135/3.5 that isn't focusing to infinity.
I've finally gotten the grip off, there is 3 screws
around the barrel that seem to hold the filter ring in
place. Those screws will not budge. I'm starting to
think the standard six piece kit of precision phillips
I built one of these and it is still there in my ex-darkroom. Hardly ever
used it as dust was not a big problem in my darkroom and if speed was
essential I would wet print.
Powell
What about blowing some air in ? it won't work unfortunately...
but i've found something interesting on the net...
You need a JIS Crosspoint driver - available from Micro Tools:
http://www.micro-tools.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PRODStore_Code=MT;
Product_Code=58-0318
Heat the screws to 450 degrees with a soldering iron to loosen the locktite.
This may help:
http://members.shaw.ca/hargravep/70-210.htm
Saturday, July 30, 2005, 12:35:39 AM, Shel wrote:
SB No, not the mountain, the Pentax ;-))
SB It might be nice to get a K2. Does anyone have experience using one,
SB especially a K2-DMD. Problems to look for? Idiosyncrasies?
SB Shel
It was the first Pentax I got.
It was their first
The ISO speed ring (combined with AE compensation) suffers from being
too open to elements. But cleaning is very easy, requires just a
screwdriver. After cleaning, it works like a charm.
The other idiosyncracies I mentioned.
Good light!
fra
Depends on what your protecting against. We always require at least one
backup copy of film media of any value to another location.
Otis Wright
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: David Savage Subject: Re: Backing
Up and Storing Files
Just like film eh?
The nice
On Jul 30, 2005, at 10:53 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
When I read about what people are doing to secure their digitized and
digital files I realize that I could never do all that on a regular
basis.
I really don't do much to secure my digital imagery that I don't
just do as a matter of
any non-gimbaled head has the camera system center of gravity above the
pivot point. you unlock the head, the camera falls over unless you are
holding it with something. if you are going after static subjects, then this
isn't a big deal. if your head can be set to fairly stiff resistance, it's
William
I'm using a Kirk King Cobra gimbal head with their quick release system
(what I had @ GFM) on my 600mm FA. The lens plate is longer than the lens
tripod foot, so I can rebalance when I add a teleconvertor or change
bodies.
Obviously, you can use any of the previously suggested heads but
Interspersed
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
When I read about what people are doing to secure their digitized and
digital files I realize that I could never do all that on a regular
basis.
I really don't do much to secure my digital imagery that I don't
just do as a
Shot this 2 years ago and was never content with my
reaction to it.
Converted it to BW awhile back and as a result, had
it substituted for the color version on my site.
With the Dummies book on my lap, I fumbled with PS
Elements 3 'til discovering and clicking on
Grayscale.
Wanted to encourage
On Jul 31, 2005, at 11:11 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
My life isn't on the computer, it's not organized around it. All the
records i need to secure are elsewhere.
Yes, we have different ways of dealing with living. I moved all my
record keeping, writing, bill paying, financial management,
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller
Subject: Re: Tripod heads
William
I'm using a Kirk King Cobra gimbal head with their quick release system
(what I had @ GFM) on my 600mm FA. The lens plate is longer than the lens
tripod foot, so I can rebalance when I add a teleconvertor
Same here.
Godfrey
On Jul 31, 2005, at 8:24 AM, David Savage wrote:
I can't remember who suggested it to me, but I used to hang my film in
the shower. Run the hot water for a while with the door closed
extraction fan off, let the steam build up a little, (to help settle
any dust) wait for
so long as the mounting point is above the pivot point, any movement
unbalances everything. gimbaled heads are the best way to avoid this. no,
you don't need one, but trust me, you don't want to work that way.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I use a Tiltall under my olde Takumar f4/300 mm 240mm long, 1,500
grams heavy.
It's made of very strudy and light aluminum.
Jim
William Robb wrote:
Hi;
I am wondering what the big lens owners are using to support their large
sized glass?
I am interested in the advantages and disadvantages
Jack,
I like the BW, but is it a difference in size that does this?
The color is a smaller jpeg.
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/31/05, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shot this 2 years ago and was never content with my
reaction to it.
Converted it to BW awhile back and as a result, had
it
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong
Subject: Re: Tripod heads
so long as the mounting point is above the pivot point, any movement
unbalances everything. gimbaled heads are the best way to avoid this. no,
you don't need one, but trust me, you don't want to work that way.
I am
the more expensive one includes an Arca-Swiss style clamp while the cheaper
one doesn't. if you don't use the clamp, you will directly attach the lens
to the head with a hex key. with the clamp, you attach a Wimberley plate to
the lens and then clamp the lens on the head. it will take you a
i forgot to mention, you can add a 3rd party Arca-Swiss-style clamp to a
Wimberley head. i have been thinking about it, but haven't gotten around to
it. the only complexity is the mounting screws to fasten the clamp and i
have been lazy.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong
Wow! Nice, Fred.
Joe
Congratulations, Bill.
Does anyone have the url? I can'd find it in the completed listings.
Thanks,
Joe
back in October
Paul, Bill see ya soon
BRuce, Frank, Dave see you not quite as soon :)
i'm outta here
ann
p.s. anyone really looking for me, I'll check
email when off list when I can
On 31/7/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Most images don't deserve to live as long as the medium
Mark!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Hi folks,
The August PUG is available on my website AND on the komkon server.
The komkon server is back online. Thanks Igor for all your hard work to make
that happen. :-)
http://www.kirschten.de/PUG/05aug
and http://pug.komkon.org
Cheers
Adelheid
See you soon. Have a good trip.
Paul
On Jul 31, 2005, at 5:02 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
back in October
Paul, Bill see ya soon
BRuce, Frank, Dave see you not quite as soon :)
i'm outta here
ann
p.s. anyone really looking for me, I'll check
email when off list when I can
Hi all,
I think, someone of you has faced this problem before.
with 35mm film, you can take film out of plastic can, shoot it, and
place it safely back in can. this way it is safe from water, extreeme
cold and other problems.
With 120 film you break the sealed plastic bag, shoot it, and...?
Hi Adelheid and Igor
thanks for the work and for the PUG every month, I enjoy it.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Adelheid v. K. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2005 11:55 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: August PUG is open
Hi folks,
The August PUG
This should take care of it for you:
http://jandcphoto.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWCATSCategory=101
Otherwise, maybe put them in ziplock bags and store them in a
protective case or box of some sort.
On 7/31/05, Gasha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I think, someone of you has faced this
Favorites:
Dancing in Oslo's Harbour by Jaume Lahuerta - great action/energy
Terns Dancing by Thrainn Vigfusson - beautiful and elegant picture
Pussinova by Cotty - love the stretch in stripes and the claws out
Dancers on the Rocks by Derby Chang - enjoyed the 3 expressions from the girls
Congrats
Gaha,
I've found Zip-Lock or Slider-Seal sandwich size
plastic bags have a fairly positive seal.
I use them for both exposed and unexposed MF and 35mm.
As you doubtless already know, if transferred from
cool to hot storage, tightly sealed plastic bags tend
to allow internal condensation.
Wow, thx.
Exactly what i need.
Ziplock is ok, unless you damage it in backpack.
I'll order these after return.
Gasha
Scott Loveless wrote:
This should take care of it for you:
http://jandcphoto.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWCATSCategory=101
Otherwise, maybe put them in ziplock bags and
In the meantime, you might use empty medicine bottles. OTC solid
white aspirin bottles should provide a decent seal to prevent water
from getting in.
On 7/31/05, Gasha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, thx.
Exactly what i need.
Ziplock is ok, unless you damage it in backpack.
I'll order
Hey, Scott - great info! Thanks!
Shel
From: Scott Loveless
http://jandcphoto.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWCATSCategory=101
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31/7/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Most images don't deserve to live as long as the medium
Mark!
I think Bill Robb's over quota for this year, Cotty.
;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Sounds like this might fill the bill -
http://www.tripodhead.com/products/sidekick-main.cfm - the Sidekick, comes
with a quick release, you'll need to pop an additional $50 to 75 for a QR
plate for the lens.
Its made to fit an existing ball head.
The WH100 WH101 are the same with the addition
Well, I guess, I won't be going to London this fall!
I just received news from the BBC Wildlife Photographer of the Year contest
that none of my seven submitted images had made it through the semi final
stage of the competition (out of 17000 submitted)
The winning photographer will receive his
the word backup usually implies some kind of reliability. hard drives
are not.
it would be *ok* if you kept a *second copy* of each file there.
but that's in effect RAID 1 where you do what RAID controller does:
making sure you have two copies of everything.
at this point, i am keeping two
I wouldn't correct the perspective. I didn't even think about it. To
me, photographic perspective is normal. It's what I expect to see in
a wide angle photo, so it works.
Paul
On Jul 31, 2005, at 4:05 AM, Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Paul
thanks for the nice comment.
Would you always correct
Bob,
Am furnishing a new link to a larger version of the
color Teton Aspen image. May be a better comparison.
Pls take a look and I'd appreciate your comments.
Thanks.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=80
--- Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack,
I like the BW,
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo