On 1/31/06, Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have just been reading Bryan Peterson's recent book Understanding Digital
> Photography. It is an excellent read and I would highly recommend it. In
> one part of his book he recommends setting the white balance on the camera
I'll try to isolate some part of it and see if that works.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 1/30/06, keith_w <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gautam Sarup wrote:
>
> > Ken is it totally off or do you think something could be
> > done to give it some appeal?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gautam
>
> Ken has touched on
I've recently taken a lot of photos in cloudy conditions,
particularly in early morning light, and had a fair amount of
trouble getting a realistic colour balance. That may be more to
do with the morning light than the cloudy conditions but I tend
to think that it is a bit of both.
I didn't h
Jack,
This sculpture is in a shop in the San Francisco Chinatown
so there's not much scope for taking time to set up a shot.
So far what I've understood is to:
1. Isolate some part (center figures.)
2. Increase the DOF.
3. Increase the exposure to get the figures closer to white.
I'll probably h
On Feb 1, 2006, at 6:52 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
As to the aesthetics of viewing panoramas ... in general, I find
most presentations for anything with a more oblong proportion than
about 4:1 very difficult to view on any flat screen in a still-
image representation.
3:1 is about my limi
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Bruce Dayton"
Subject: Re: PESO - Soft
Not bad. The effect is pretty good, but not exactly like a soft focus
lens. I have seen many attempts with PS to duplicate and have yet to
see the same thing. I suspect one issue is that when t
Dear All,
I have just been reading Bryan Peterson's recent book Understanding Digital
Photography. It is an excellent read and I would highly recommend it. In
one part of his book he recommends setting the white balance on the camera
to cloudy +3 . His reasoning for this is it gives his pic
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Jens Bladt"
Subject: OT: Chinese Manfrotto copies?
Take a look at these cheap tripod heads.
Aren't they Manfrotto copies?
At very low prices!
I wonder if this is legal?
http://tinyurl.com/7d93q
Connection refused when trying to con
Thats right - I almmost forgot.
Nike - and others - can get Java here:
http://www.sun.com/
For those who believe Java is just for fun or annoyance,
I can tell you, that here Java is required for those who want internet
banking.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelel
BTW:
There's a big difference between javascript (a pseudo-universal
scripting language that is quasi-supported in most modern browsers,
modeled on Java language syntax) and Java (an object oriented
language with C-language-derivative syntax that loads virtual image
applets onto an underl
neat! it would get me dizzy if I left it running for too long, but i
like it.
Godfrey
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:18 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
It's winter in Denmark:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/pano/newfile6.html
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
Actually its really easy to add more photos and edit other setting in
your existing album.
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff"
Subject: RE: Porta Web Gallery Creator
The other thing that's important for me is being able to simply add a
photo
or two without having to redo the whole process. And it would be nice if
the photo could be placed anywhere in the queue.
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, 12:51:48, pnstenquist wrote:
A fat guy squinting in the sun???
He's my financial advisor; I thought I'd put him to some honest work
for a change! I'd just received the lens and wanted a subject for my
tests of proper operation. A little softening did him a world of
On Feb 1, 2006, at 5:55 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Anything photographic is rarely cheap in Britain. Probably one of
the most
expensive European countries for photographic equipment - next to
Skandinaiva, naturally.
I still remember selling my RB67 kit in London for slightly more
money than I'd
On Feb 1, 2006, at 5:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used a Pentax K2 to try and take star trails. The silver oxide
batteries allowed me just 30 minutes before shutting off.
I didn't think the K2 used the battery in "B". Maybe it does, but
it'll still work OK without the battery.
Cheer
I shot both Digital (*istD) and film (MX) with my Tamron. Sold it with
the D and am missing it, I'll probably get another one in Canon mount,
and maybe another one for the MX (that combination works really well)
-Adam
Bruce Dayton wrote:
You haven't said whether you are using digital or not
Don,
Thank you for introducing this program. With practically no imaging
experience, I found this program very easy to use with respect to re-sizing,
caption placement, and assembly. I took image files straight off the card ran
them through the program and voila! A gallery was born.
http://patko
You haven't said whether you are using digital or not - might have
some bearing. I shoot weddings fairly often. I used to use a Tamron
28-75/2.8, which was quite nice. It took a few spills and is out of
alignment and the focus gearing is crunched.
Since then I picked up an A 35-105/3.5. I have
I second Adam's recommendation. I've had my Tamron 28-75 for about a
year now, and it's everything he says - excellent color, nice and
sharp. Nate liked it so much that I got him one, and he usually
prefers primes as well. Here's a sample shot I took with the Tam (not
full size, but I can send you
Thanks, Don ... I've DL'd the program and will take it for a test drive in
a day or so. I'm not thrilled with the appearance as it is, either in your
sample or of the skins shown on the web site, but maybe it can be
customized.
The other thing that's important for me is being able to simply add a
This one time, at band camp, "Paul Ewins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we have no bill
> of rights so we have no inalienable rights, and specifically no right of
> privacy. Putting it another way, our rights as photographers stem from other
> people's lack of rights to prevent us taking photos.
M
Gee, Scott, even though it's a fair amount of money,
the FA 24-90 is one honey of a lens. I doubt you
would find its equal in anything but a set of primes,
or maybe the 28-70/2.8 (mucho money!).
Rick
--- Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howdy!
>
> I'm considering enabling myself wit
No question. Tamron SP 28-75 f2.8 XR Di. Small, light, sharp as a tack,
gorgeous colour, good bokeh. The Sigma's 4mm wider and 5mm shorter
FL-wise, but noticably wider and softer wide open (The Sigma's good, but
the Tamron's merely superb). I've no info on the Tokina.
I sold my 28/2.8 after ge
Howdy!
I'm considering enabling myself with a new zoom lens or two. While I
don't really use zooms that much for my personal photography, I've
been offered a handful of wedding jobs and am looking at some faster
(f2.8) lenses. Pentax lenses would normally be my choice, but they
seem to be expens
Thanks Keith, it validates the diagnostic tool. Regards, Bob S.
On 1/31/06, Keith McGuinness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But perhaps read these first...
> http://www.snopes.com/medical/disease/stroke.asp
> http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=52795
>
> Keith McG
>
> Bob Sul
OMG this is the most useful program ever!! I have a website, and I'm
running the coppermine gallery php template and it is s slow. I
can't believe this is free. I love it! I love PDML!
Here Shel, I just grabbed a folder full of .jpgs and ran it through Porta.
Didn't bother to edit, rotate, etc.
Took about 1 minute.
Check out the "LightBox" and "Show all" features to the left of the
thumbnails.
The right and left arrows navigate.
Took about an hour to make 12 galleries and check o
Hi Don,
Have you - or has anyone - put up a few pages made with Porta? Got a link?
Although I've not tried this program yet, I'm sometimes amazed at how good
some of the free programs are. Spybot and Irfanview come immediately to
mind, but there are a few others that I use as well.
Shel
> [
Great, that's good to know. I've only downloaded manuals for older
cameras.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Adam Maas
> The poor quality ones are only the older ones that pentax had to scan.
> The newer ones are just converted to PDF electronically and posted.
> Quuality is as good or
Ahh, yes - that was a specific reference to Java and assorted other such
plug-ins.
Thanks for clarifying that.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: mike wilson
> Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> > Who said it was junk? Who said it is inappropriate to offer it as a
PESO?
> > If you're implying that I
Just tried Porta, which was recomended in the recent
"Web Page" thread.
Simple, effective and VERY, VERY fast!
It's here:
http://www.stegmann.dk/mikkel/porta/
While you're there check out his other stuff, like Barnack:
http://www.stegmann.dk/mikkel/barnack/
Pretty cool, and all free. ;-)
Don
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Maas"
Subject: Re: PESO - Soft
William,
Why not get an old uncoated M42 Tessar off eBay and use it on your
digital? Should have quite the 'old-fashioned' look to it. Real Carl
Zeiss Tessars are available in M42 mount pretty regularly on the Bay.
William Robb wrote:
I was going to comment on this earlier today, but was short of time
this morning.
I believe soft focus lenses are using uncorrected spherical abberation
to create the effects that they produce.
If you want to emulate the old portraiture style, then short depth of
field comb
Thanks for that Paul - I have on occasion (as reported here last year) stood
my ground when challenged taking photos in public. I am well aware of the
legal situation, but the fact is that the current hysteria about
paedophiles, digital cameras and camera-phones is of such intensity that
merel
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jan 31, 2006, at 14:02, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Called up the camera shop. It was a Minolta X-700.
I haven't done a direct comparison, but it seems no less bright than
the stock -DS screen. It could even be brighter (and would explain t
The poor quality ones are only the older ones that pentax had to scan.
The newer ones are just converted to PDF electronically and posted.
Quuality is as good or better than the printed mauals.
-Adam
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi,
Have you seen the PDF manuals on the Pentax site. All that I've
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 11:25:25AM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> I don't understand the point of what you're doing. It would be simpler to
> have a panorama that one could scroll through, left to right. It seems like
> an exercise in technology more than anything else. Speaking for myself,
> the
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: Put the credit cards away folks.Feb 3 is the new date.
It's a trick!
Yeah, there only telling that to Canadians and other foreigners...
Like as if any of us could unseat Charles Braswell.
William Robb
But perhaps read these first...
http://www.snopes.com/medical/disease/stroke.asp
http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=52795
Keith McG
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Received this today and it makes good sense. Bob S.
It only takes a minute to read this-
Recognizing a Stroke
A neuro
On Jan 31, 2006, at 14:02, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Called up the camera shop. It was a Minolta X-700.
I haven't done a direct comparison, but it seems no less bright
than the stock -DS screen. It could even be brighter (and would
explain the propensity for the camera to underexpose
"William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: "Jens Bladt"
>
>> Take a look at these cheap tripod heads.
>> Aren't they Manfrotto copies?
>> At very low prices!
>> I wonder if this is legal?
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/7d93q
>
>Connection refused when trying to connect to tinyurl.com.
>I wish peopl
This is exactly as I see it. It is a challenge -and a lot of fun - to
select a picture meeting the monthly subject.
It is almost like a real photo club where you come together each month
and discuss each others pictures.
I do support upgrading of image size to 800 max (if this can be
accomodated o
Yes, I misunderstood. You were apparently labeling java as "junk." My
apologies.
Paul
On Jan 31, 2006, at 5:28 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Who said it was junk? Who said it is inappropriate to offer it as a
PESO? If you're implying that I said that, or that anyone here sai
Received this today and it makes good sense. Bob S.
It only takes a minute to read this-
Recognizing a Stroke
A neurologist says that if he can get to a stroke victim within 3 hours he
can totally reverse the effects of a stroke...totally. He said the trick
was getting a stroke recognized, diagn
On 31 Jan 2006 at 16:25, William Robb wrote:
> Why not just stitch your panorama together and put it up as a jpeg file on
> an html page, just like an ordinary picture. It will be wider than most
> screens, but can be maneuvered through with sideways scrolling.
It's hard to please everybody in
Gautam,
I've noticed this thread, but didn't check the content 'til just now.
This is likely not a new thought, but have you tried concentrating on
the center figures, using a small aperture and side lighting to give
depth and definition to their features?
Jack
--- Gautam Sarup <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 1/31/06, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Just looked at the GFM site.
> > Feb 3 is the new date for the form.
> >
>
> It's a trick!
Yeah, there only telling that to Canadians and other foreigners...
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois con
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Who said it was junk? Who said it is inappropriate to offer it as a PESO?
If you're implying that I said that, or that anyone here said that, the
implication is dead wrong, and I am somewhat miffed at the idea that you
think I said or implied any such thing. In fact, qui
Jostein wrote:
Maybe he needs Java?
Jostein
Indeed. No java enabled on my machines. Not allowed at work and I am
not happy having it on my home machines. I also don't allow tinyurl to
send me ads, so that doesn't work either. Sorry, Jens, but I'm out.
- Original Message - Fro
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt"
Subject: RE: PESO: (Panorama Ever So Often)
What you are suggesting can do this as well - perhaps in a less annoying
way.
Do you know of a tool that can do this, please let me know. I'm
interested!
Why not just stitch your panorama together
Hi,
Have you seen the PDF manuals on the Pentax site. All that I've seen are
like this wrt quality:
http://www.pentaximaging.com/files/manual/K1000.pdf
I don't think "quality" is a word to describe these files ...
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
> I'd debate "lesser qua
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt"
Subject: OT: Chinese Manfrotto copies?
Take a look at these cheap tripod heads.
Aren't they Manfrotto copies?
At very low prices!
I wonder if this is legal?
http://tinyurl.com/7d93q
Connection refused when trying to connect to tinyurl.com.
I
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton"
Subject: Re: PESO - Soft
Not bad. The effect is pretty good, but not exactly like a soft focus
lens. I have seen many attempts with PS to duplicate and have yet to
see the same thing. I suspect one issue is that when the picture is
taken,
Hi Boris,
I should have exposed one more stop. Thanks to the comments
here I think the whole thing needs to be redone. Will give it
another shot when I'm in Chinatown next.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 1/31/06, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > No name and no Pentax content either. T
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just looked at the GFM site.
Feb 3 is the new date for the form.
It's a trick!
On 31 Jan 2006 at 13:23, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I thought I said that.
>
> I'd debate "lesser quality" ... I suspect that if you have a decent
> printer, printing the manual from a PDF file will prove to be higher
> quality than the booklet provided by Pentax with the camera.
True, the il
You can order original printed manuals from Pentax as well.
Shel
> On Jan 31, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
>
> Or for free, though lesser quality, from the Pentax USA site:
> http://www.pentaximaging.com/files/manual/istD_IB.pdf
Butch, it all depends on whether you can get XP drivers for the peripheral.
When I upgraded my desktop to XP Pro, I had to move my flatbed scanner to
another PC as the manufacturer would not provide a driver.
http://www.windowsxp-drivers.com/ is a good site for a starting point to
obtain drive
I thought I said that.
I'd debate "lesser quality" ... I suspect that if you have a decent
printer, printing the manual from a PDF file will prove to be higher
quality than the booklet provided by Pentax with the camera.
I never use the printed manual however. It's much easier to search
t
>On 29/1/06, Mark Erickson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>FA* 85/1.4: $500 to $800 depending on condition
>
>ROTFL
>
>I'd say $500 to $1500.
>
>Really.
Apologies Mark, I was thinking of the A* 85, not the FA*.
(my excuse: moving house and living amongst 75% of the world's cardboard
supply
On 31/1/06, Mishka, discombobulated, unleashed:
>???
>b&h lists it for 800 new (back ordered at the moment).
Sorry - I thought he was referring to the A* 85
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Maybe he needs Java?
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 10:03 PM
Subject: RE: PESO: (Panorama Ever So Often)
Sorry 'bout that, Mike.
You must be missig the last part of the URL.
Try this:
http://tinyurl.com/77b3v
R
Congrats, Jens.
A fine treat. :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:36 PM
Subject: OT: (sort of) Panorama on Japanese website
Hello list
Now I am officially credited for a winter panorama at the Japanese
websi
My longest exposures so far with either original 645 or Nii has been
around 15 minutes. On several occasions in temperatures well below
zero celsius; when alkaline batteries perform poorly. No problems at
all.
If you notice any problems, there is an external battery pack
accessory for the 645
Sorry 'bout that, Mike.
You must be missig the last part of the URL.
Try this:
http://tinyurl.com/77b3v
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 31. januar 2006 10:02
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: PESO: (
A fat guy squinting in the sun???
-- Original message --
From: Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thats amazing. Thanks Jim. I shows a much larger soft effect than I
> expected at 2.8. I dont think you can achieve this with cheap normal
> lenses as has been mentione
Thats amazing. Thanks Jim. I shows a much larger soft effect than I
expected at 2.8. I dont think you can achieve this with cheap normal
lenses as has been mentioned.
Jim King wrote:
Here is a link to some casual portraits illustrating the range of
softening available from the Pentax FA 8
I didnt notice the tone. My LCD display here is not the best for
viewing pics. At home I have a nice large color managed CRT which would
probably show it.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hmmm ... you didn't mention the slightly warmer tone ... were you not able
to see it? It's subtle. If you view t
Just looked at the GFM site.
Feb 3 is the new date for the form.
Dave
Who said it was junk? Who said it is inappropriate to offer it as a PESO?
If you're implying that I said that, or that anyone here said that, the
implication is dead wrong, and I am somewhat miffed at the idea that you
think I said or implied any such thing. In fact, quite the contrary - I
said
Do you remember which Minolta model was the donor? This may be useful for
those thousands following you :)
Called up the camera shop. It was a Minolta X-700.
I haven't done a direct comparison, but it seems no less bright
than the stock -DS screen. It could even be brighter (and wo
I think the polite approach to such a thing might be to offer the viewer a
choice, rather than launching straight into the Java stuff and a moving
panorama. The key to usability is handing over control to the user, not
having the machine (or, more accurately, the programmer) make the user's
decisio
Probably not entirely legal, but certainly not uncommon. I know several
people who use Manfrotto knockoffs (Close enough that my genuine
Manfrotto QR plates work in them).
-Adam
Jens Bladt wrote:
Take a look at these cheap tripod heads.
Aren't they Manfrotto copies?
At very low prices!
I w
Sure we live in a free world ... and you can present your photos and files
in any way you choose. It's just my own situation that makes viewing them
difficult, but I also know that there are others on the list that will be
excluded from seeing your work as well.
I don't know much about panorama t
Take a look at these cheap tripod heads.
Aren't they Manfrotto copies?
At very low prices!
I wonder if this is legal?
http://tinyurl.com/7d93q
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
Thanks, Paul.
I agree. Well put :-)
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 31. januar 2006 20:43
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: PESO: (Panorama Ever So Often)
I understand Shel's unhappines
Or for free, though lesser quality, from the Pentax USA site:
http://www.pentaximaging.com/files/manual/istD_IB.pdf
D
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I'd suggest printing the manual from the download file, but Craig
Camera, http://www.craigcamera.com/, has reprints of the *ist D manual
available for
Shel
I'm sure we all appreciate that we (to some extend) live in a free world,
that gives us choises. Some people want Quicktime panoramas, others want
java panoramas, some don't want any. That's fine with me.
Your suggestion about a "scrollable" panorama is actually a very good idea,
I think. But
On 1/31/06, Juan Buhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Excellent shot Frank, I love it! Great moment captured.
>
> It's also straight and in focus... Nice to see you're trying new things :)
Thank you, Juan! I've got another subway shot getting printed up for
next week that should be both tilted ~an
I understand Shel's unhappiness here, but I found Jens' panorama quite
interesting and well done. And I believe it's perfectly appropriate to offer it
as a PESO. Those who wish to view it will do so. Those who would prefer not to
look at it. won't. But I think it's wrong to dismiss it as "junk."
Here is a link to some casual portraits illustrating the range of
softening available from the Pentax FA 85mm f2.8 Soft. lens:
http://www.pbase.com/jamesk8752/fa85_soft
Regards, Jim
I don't understand the point of what you're doing. It would be simpler to
have a panorama that one could scroll through, left to right. It seems like
an exercise in technology more than anything else. Speaking for myself,
the viewing experience is awful and not at all satisfying.
This thing that
Both, naturally. I took a photograph (and stores it as a computer file,
which can be reproduced as a photograph). Then turned it into a file in an
application, that just shows a part of it - which part changes a little bit
every second.
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelels
So?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "David Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 1:49 AM
Subject: Re: PUG (No longer Re: *istD2)
On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Personally I don't care about equipment - it's all about the photo
Hmmm ... you didn't mention the slightly warmer tone ... were you not able
to see it? It's subtle. If you view the pic in PS, which is a color
managed space, the differences may become more apparent.
Glad you found the crop to your liking ;-))
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Gonz
> Very
Very nice, thanks. I see you touched up some of the blemishes, which I
debated doing or not. The crop is also very interesting, giving more
space to the right and not centering the face. Your crop looks alot
better to me. I appreciate your efforts. I learned something.
rg
Shel Belinkoff
I clicked on all the buttons, and couldn't get it to stop, only reverse
direction. Maybe my Java's not up to date. I don't care - I'm not
downloading any more junk like that to my computer. Anyway, this isn't a
corporate computer ...
You say it's a photograph, and then you say it's not a photog
Adjusted version:
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/soft.html
The Gonz Original:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/k2softaprox.jpg
The differences are subtle, apart from the crop, so, if you can, you might
want to look at the two side-by-side.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Gonz <[EMAIL PROT
Hmmm...
There is a button to stop it moving...
It is a photgraph - not flat but cylindrical...
Internet pictures arent really photographs, they are computer files...
Java is today a standard feature in a large number of corpotate computers,
just like Acrobat Reader, mediaplayers etc...
Regards
Jen
"Shooting The War" is the name of the documentary.
On 1/31/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is "Shooting the War" the name of the documentary or just the subject line
> of your message?
>
> Shel
>
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Antonios Kekalos
>
> > Interesting documentary y
Is "Shooting the War" the name of the documentary or just the subject line
of your message?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Antonios Kekalos
> Interesting documentary yesterday afternoon on the Sundance channel.
> Many photo journalists featured. Noticed the documentary was filmed
> in 199
Me too although I already had the plug-in, and did look at the pic.
It's a moving panorama, and it drove me nuts. Had to shut it down, in part
because it moved and I couldn't see details of any one area, and in part it
made me dizzy. It was like looking at a scene while spinning around ...
Den 31. jan. 2006 kl. 04.31 skrev Keith McGuinness:
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
AvK wrote:
the February PUG is open.
It can be found at http://pug.komkon.org
It is indeed "small but nice."
Four I think are truly excellent: "Paris from the ground up,"
"Sundial shell," "Undone" and "In the air."
Th
Not bad. The effect is pretty good, but not exactly like a soft focus
lens. I have seen many attempts with PS to duplicate and have yet to
see the same thing. I suspect one issue is that when the picture is
taken, the actual depth of the image comes into play with the lens
effect. When in PS, y
Anything photographic is rarely cheap in Britain. Probably one of the most
expensive European countries for photographic equipment - next to
Skandinaiva, naturally.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 30. janu
I used a Pentax K2 to try and take star trails. The silver oxide
batteries allowed me just 30 minutes before shutting off. Next time I go
to the southern Oregon desert and try star trails again, I'm using a
mechanical Spotmatic.
Don't know how AAs would work out with the 645.
Jim A.
> Hi
Excellent shot Frank, I love it! Great moment captured.
It's also straight and in focus... Nice to see you're trying new things :)
j
On 1/30/06, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know I only did a PAW on Saturday, but I got this one printed up,
> too, and I'm away next weekend, so I
Bare Naked Ladies, huh? No problemo. Very nice Bill. The light is
great, and the exposure got it just right.
William Robb wrote:
Please note:
By clicking on the below link, you are agreeing that you are of legal
age to view a picture of a naked female Homo Sapien, are aware that the
pictur
Hello list
Now I am officially credited for a winter panorama at the Japanese website,
promoting Photovista Panorama:
http://www.inview.jp/about_us.html
The "original" panorama looks like this:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/pano/
(Well, it's not totally OT - it was shot with a Pentax *ist D and SMC
Pen
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
