On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:01:40 +0930, Keith McGuinness wrote:
Paris from the ground up is my favourite: love it.
Thanks for the thumbs up Keith!
Regards, JvW
--
Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery
Bill thanks for the warning, but I'll have to sue you for not telling me the
gorgeous model bears a startling resemblance to a very good friend of mine -
who is actually coming over tonight! I'll be able to ask her how she go to
Canada and back since we last saw her on Sunday!
Great shot by
I'm just getting blue background, title, some link to the software, the picture
information and your email link. No picture or link to it.
PC/2000/NS7.2
mike
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/31 Tue AM 07:18:25 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: (Panorama Ever
On 30/1/06, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed:
Registration for the 2006 GFMNPW begins February 1st, kids. It will sell
out in a matter of hours. Set your clocks.
WAA!
I'm absolutely gutted.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
On 29/1/06, Mark Erickson, discombobulated, unleashed:
FA* 85/1.4: $500 to $800 depending on condition
ROTFL
I'd say $500 to $1500.
Really.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote on 31.01.06 3:40:
I set up the R2400 with Matte Black when I got it and have never
changed inks. I don't use anything other than matte surface papers.
The same here with Epson Stylus 2100. Prints on EEM looks beautiful when
printed using matte black - I just love their
Hi all,
I'm going to try some longer exposures, maybe star trails, etc.
So far i know about possibility to run out of batteries.
It is bad. But how about switching off camera after release cable is fixed?
Anybody tried it?
Better idea would be to use fixed lens camera, like Yashica or
Lovely shot, Jens,
Even shooting straight into the sun, that part of the pano is crisp and
clear.
D
mike wilson wrote:
I'm just getting blue background, title, some link to the software, the picture
information and your email link. No picture or link to it.
PC/2000/NS7.2
mike
I got it. A nicely executed 360 degree panorama. Makes me shiver :-),
although it's probably colder here in Michigan on average. Good work.
Paul
On Jan 31, 2006, at 4:02 AM, mike wilson wrote:
I'm just getting blue background, title, some link to the software,
the picture information and your
Interesting documentary yesterday afternoon on the Sundance channel.
Many photo journalists featured. Noticed the documentary was filmed
in 1999 so many of you may have already seen it. Worth watching if
it's aired again. Unknown Pentax content. Showed many of the
photojournalists with their
G'day All.
Has anyone got an original owner's manual for a *ist D that they would
want to part with?
I took delivery of a *ist D from KEH today. Everything was in the box
except the Manual.
I know that manuals can be d/loaded from Pentax website, But it is not
the same as having the real thing.
are you kidding? run out of AA batteries by just keeping the shutter open?
how long is going to be the exposure - months?
best,
mishka
On 1/31/06, Gasha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm going to try some longer exposures, maybe star trails, etc.
So far i know about possibility to run out
???
bh lists it for 800 new (back ordered at the moment).
best,
mishka
On 1/30/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/1/06, Mark Erickson, discombobulated, unleashed:
FA* 85/1.4: $500 to $800 depending on condition
ROTFL
I'd say $500 to $1500.
Really.
Cheers,
Cotty
- Original Message -
From: Mishka
Subject: Re: P645 and lng exposures
are you kidding? run out of AA batteries by just keeping the shutter open?
how long is going to be the exposure - months?
I don't know about the 645, but Pentax indicates in the 6x7 manual that a
fresh
so I bought the split-prism screen out of an old dead Minolta for $5.
Do you remember which Minolta model was the donor? This may be useful for
those thousands following you :)
The guy who runs the shop is kinda surly and had already taken the
screen out. I think I may have seen the donor
Manual says, that fresh set of 6 AA batteries (good alkaline batteries)
can take 250 rolls of film.
So, i have good Duracell alkalines installed.
I think, that i can get more than one 6 hour exposure from fresh batteries.
Whatever, the original question was how to keep fresh batteries, and
On 1/31/06, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's winter in Denmark:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/pano/newfile6.html
Regards
I refuse to look at a photo that tells me to download a plug-in before
I can look at it.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 1/30/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please note:
By clicking on the below link, you are agreeing that you are of legal age to
view a picture of a naked female Homo Sapien, are aware that the picture you
are about to see is a picture of a human female wearing no clothing, and
On 1/28/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shot on Chicgo's Michigan Avenue with the mighty Elph point and shoot:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4068213
Well caught, Paul!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 1/30/06, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank,
Nice idea, well executed. I wish we had more of the side people.
The kids are great.
Regards, Bob S.
Thanks, Bob. Glad you enjoyed it!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been concentrating on matte surface papers ... Epson Enhanced
Matte and a little Velvet Fine Art so far. Very very nice results. I
do want to try some Hahnemuele, though I'll probably be spoiled if I do.
I'm just itching to get my hands on some
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/29/06, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears the sensor in my *istDS is tilted by about 1 degree. May not
sound like much but actually is a whole lot with industry and
architecture.
Has anyone else had this problem with a Pentax
Which war? I was about to ask, but then I checked with Google and found this
link:
http://www.sundancechannel.com/film/?ixFilmID=5906rname=The%20Sundance%20Ch
annel%20Schedule
Thanks for the information - I'll keep an eye out for that, it's my kind of
thing.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original
On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:41, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
In case anyone's curious, I did the point-and-shoot-through-the-
viewfinder:
http://www.ee.vt.edu/~mythtv/focused.jpg
http://www.ee.vt.edu/~mythtv/unfocused.jpg
That's exactly what I was planning on doing when my Katz-eye comes
in! Thanks
I've come across this webpage by mistake:
http://www.soundgenerator.com/news/index.cfm?articleid=6430maingenreid=2
Have you noticed anything odd in this page? :-)
Dario
Dario Bonazza wrote on 31.01.06 15:42:
I've come across this webpage by mistake:
http://www.soundgenerator.com/news/index.cfm?articleid=6430maingenreid=2
Have you noticed anything odd in this page? :-)
Polish ad at right side of the page? ;-)
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax sighting
Dario Bonazza wrote on 31.01.06 15:42:
I've come across this webpage by mistake:
Hi!
Hello list.
This is a third version of my Icy Branch. This one is shot at F.14.
I have added three levels of Gaussian Blur - Radius 10, 20 and 30 pixel - in
order to make up for the unpleasant bokeh.
What do you think?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72057594055182520/
I think I
Hi!
Yes, you missed it. Not seeing the child's face is my main objection.
Ditto!!!
Boris
Hi!
Submitted for your approval:
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/slides_temp/pages/page_9.html
Techno stuff:
Camera: K-1000
Lens: 50mm @ f2.0
Film: Ektachrome 200
Exposure: About 10 seconds
Tripod: We don't need no steenkin' tripod! Set it on the ground and
get away
Great
Hi!
No name and no Pentax content either. This was shot with an M6
and 50mm Elmar on Efke KB100 in the San Francisco Chinatown.
Comments are welcome.
http://static.flickr.com/42/81380197_98d51dd376_b.jpg
Gautam, on my monitor I don't see anything really white... Is this the
way you
Hi!
This is what my home town looks like on this cold, grey winters day.
We had a bit of freezing fog this morning (I got out too late to catch the
early morning light, street lights etc...:-/)
The temperature is still a little below zero (Two dasy ago it was -16
degrees Celcius):
Dario Bonazza wrote on 31.01.06 16:24:
You're wrong. There's an Italian ad there, below that odd-looking red logo
:-)
Mine is Polish :-) But it seems that logo above is indeed rarely seen as a
sponsor ;-)
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
Hi!
http://www.alphoto.com/images/bummer.jpg
Biga bummer mesa thinking... Very biga bummer...
;-)
Both Julia and I are laffing...
Boris
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi,
You might consider getting an old lens, like an Auto Takumar, which can be
purchased for a reasonable price, especially if the front element has some
cleaning marks.
They are surprisingly sharp, however, compared to the effects of one
of the soft lenses like the
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/31 Tue PM 04:10:32 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax sighting
Dario Bonazza wrote on 31.01.06 16:24:
You're wrong. There's an Italian ad there, below that odd-looking red logo
:-)
I'd suggest printing the manual from the download file, but Craig
Camera, http://www.craigcamera.com/, has reprints of the *ist D
manual available for $20.
#PTX-466
Instruction Manual
Pentax *istD Digital Camera (Reprint)
$20.00
Godfrey
On Jan 31, 2006, at 3:55 AM, Trevor Bailey wrote:
Hello list
Now I am officially credited for a winter panorama at the Japanese website,
promoting Photovista Panorama:
http://www.inview.jp/about_us.html
The original panorama looks like this:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/pano/
(Well, it's not totally OT - it was shot with a Pentax *ist D and SMC
Bare Naked Ladies, huh? No problemo. Very nice Bill. The light is
great, and the exposure got it just right.
William Robb wrote:
Please note:
By clicking on the below link, you are agreeing that you are of legal
age to view a picture of a naked female Homo Sapien, are aware that the
Excellent shot Frank, I love it! Great moment captured.
It's also straight and in focus... Nice to see you're trying new things :)
j
On 1/30/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know I only did a PAW on Saturday, but I got this one printed up,
too, and I'm away next weekend, so I
I used a Pentax K2 to try and take star trails. The silver oxide
batteries allowed me just 30 minutes before shutting off. Next time I go
to the southern Oregon desert and try star trails again, I'm using a
mechanical Spotmatic.
Don't know how AAs would work out with the 645.
Jim A.
Hi
Anything photographic is rarely cheap in Britain. Probably one of the most
expensive European countries for photographic equipment - next to
Skandinaiva, naturally.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 30.
Not bad. The effect is pretty good, but not exactly like a soft focus
lens. I have seen many attempts with PS to duplicate and have yet to
see the same thing. I suspect one issue is that when the picture is
taken, the actual depth of the image comes into play with the lens
effect. When in PS,
Den 31. jan. 2006 kl. 04.31 skrev Keith McGuinness:
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
AvK wrote:
the February PUG is open.
It can be found at http://pug.komkon.org
It is indeed small but nice.
Four I think are truly excellent: Paris from the ground up,
Sundial shell, Undone and In the air.
Thanks for
Me too although I already had the plug-in, and did look at the pic.
It's a moving panorama, and it drove me nuts. Had to shut it down, in part
because it moved and I couldn't see details of any one area, and in part it
made me dizzy. It was like looking at a scene while spinning around ...
Is Shooting the War the name of the documentary or just the subject line
of your message?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Antonios Kekalos
Interesting documentary yesterday afternoon on the Sundance channel.
Many photo journalists featured. Noticed the documentary was filmed
in 1999 so
Shooting The War is the name of the documentary.
On 1/31/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Shooting the War the name of the documentary or just the subject line
of your message?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Antonios Kekalos
Interesting documentary yesterday afternoon
Hmmm...
There is a button to stop it moving...
It is a photgraph - not flat but cylindrical...
Internet pictures arent really photographs, they are computer files...
Java is today a standard feature in a large number of corpotate computers,
just like Acrobat Reader, mediaplayers etc...
Regards
Adjusted version:
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/soft.html
The Gonz Original:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/k2softaprox.jpg
The differences are subtle, apart from the crop, so, if you can, you might
want to look at the two side-by-side.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Gonz [EMAIL
I clicked on all the buttons, and couldn't get it to stop, only reverse
direction. Maybe my Java's not up to date. I don't care - I'm not
downloading any more junk like that to my computer. Anyway, this isn't a
corporate computer ...
You say it's a photograph, and then you say it's not a
Very nice, thanks. I see you touched up some of the blemishes, which I
debated doing or not. The crop is also very interesting, giving more
space to the right and not centering the face. Your crop looks alot
better to me. I appreciate your efforts. I learned something.
rg
Shel
Hmmm ... you didn't mention the slightly warmer tone ... were you not able
to see it? It's subtle. If you view the pic in PS, which is a color
managed space, the differences may become more apparent.
Glad you found the crop to your liking ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Gonz
Very
So?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 1:49 AM
Subject: Re: PUG (No longer Re: *istD2)
On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Personally I don't care about equipment - it's
Both, naturally. I took a photograph (and stores it as a computer file,
which can be reproduced as a photograph). Then turned it into a file in an
application, that just shows a part of it - which part changes a little bit
every second.
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig
I don't understand the point of what you're doing. It would be simpler to
have a panorama that one could scroll through, left to right. It seems like
an exercise in technology more than anything else. Speaking for myself,
the viewing experience is awful and not at all satisfying.
This thing
Here is a link to some casual portraits illustrating the range of
softening available from the Pentax FA 85mm f2.8 Soft. lens:
http://www.pbase.com/jamesk8752/fa85_soft
Regards, Jim
I understand Shel's unhappiness here, but I found Jens' panorama quite
interesting and well done. And I believe it's perfectly appropriate to offer it
as a PESO. Those who wish to view it will do so. Those who would prefer not to
look at it. won't. But I think it's wrong to dismiss it as junk.
On 1/31/06, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent shot Frank, I love it! Great moment captured.
It's also straight and in focus... Nice to see you're trying new things :)
Thank you, Juan! I've got another subway shot getting printed up for
next week that should be both tilted ~and~
Shel
I'm sure we all appreciate that we (to some extend) live in a free world,
that gives us choises. Some people want Quicktime panoramas, others want
java panoramas, some don't want any. That's fine with me.
Your suggestion about a scrollable panorama is actually a very good idea,
I think. But I
Or for free, though lesser quality, from the Pentax USA site:
http://www.pentaximaging.com/files/manual/istD_IB.pdf
D
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I'd suggest printing the manual from the download file, but Craig
Camera, http://www.craigcamera.com/, has reprints of the *ist D manual
available for
Thanks, Paul.
I agree. Well put :-)
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 31. januar 2006 20:43
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: PESO: (Panorama Ever So Often)
I understand Shel's
Take a look at these cheap tripod heads.
Aren't they Manfrotto copies?
At very low prices!
I wonder if this is legal?
http://tinyurl.com/7d93q
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
Sure we live in a free world ... and you can present your photos and files
in any way you choose. It's just my own situation that makes viewing them
difficult, but I also know that there are others on the list that will be
excluded from seeing your work as well.
I don't know much about panorama
Probably not entirely legal, but certainly not uncommon. I know several
people who use Manfrotto knockoffs (Close enough that my genuine
Manfrotto QR plates work in them).
-Adam
Jens Bladt wrote:
Take a look at these cheap tripod heads.
Aren't they Manfrotto copies?
At very low prices!
I
I think the polite approach to such a thing might be to offer the viewer a
choice, rather than launching straight into the Java stuff and a moving
panorama. The key to usability is handing over control to the user, not
having the machine (or, more accurately, the programmer) make the user's
Do you remember which Minolta model was the donor? This may be useful for
those thousands following you :)
Called up the camera shop. It was a Minolta X-700.
I haven't done a direct comparison, but it seems no less bright
than the stock -DS screen. It could even be brighter (and
Who said it was junk? Who said it is inappropriate to offer it as a PESO?
If you're implying that I said that, or that anyone here said that, the
implication is dead wrong, and I am somewhat miffed at the idea that you
think I said or implied any such thing. In fact, quite the contrary - I
said
Just looked at the GFM site.
Feb 3 is the new date for the form.
Dave
I didnt notice the tone. My LCD display here is not the best for
viewing pics. At home I have a nice large color managed CRT which would
probably show it.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hmmm ... you didn't mention the slightly warmer tone ... were you not able
to see it? It's subtle. If you view
Thats amazing. Thanks Jim. I shows a much larger soft effect than I
expected at 2.8. I dont think you can achieve this with cheap normal
lenses as has been mentioned.
Jim King wrote:
Here is a link to some casual portraits illustrating the range of
softening available from the Pentax FA
A fat guy squinting in the sun???
-- Original message --
From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thats amazing. Thanks Jim. I shows a much larger soft effect than I
expected at 2.8. I dont think you can achieve this with cheap normal
lenses as has been mentioned.
Sorry 'bout that, Mike.
You must be missig the last part of the URL.
Try this:
http://tinyurl.com/77b3v
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 31. januar 2006 10:02
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: PESO:
My longest exposures so far with either original 645 or Nii has been
around 15 minutes. On several occasions in temperatures well below
zero celsius; when alkaline batteries perform poorly. No problems at
all.
If you notice any problems, there is an external battery pack
accessory for the
Congrats, Jens.
A fine treat. :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:36 PM
Subject: OT: (sort of) Panorama on Japanese website
Hello list
Now I am officially credited for a winter panorama at
Maybe he needs Java?
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 10:03 PM
Subject: RE: PESO: (Panorama Ever So Often)
Sorry 'bout that, Mike.
You must be missig the last part of the URL.
Try this:
On 31/1/06, Mishka, discombobulated, unleashed:
???
bh lists it for 800 new (back ordered at the moment).
Sorry - I thought he was referring to the A* 85
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 29/1/06, Mark Erickson, discombobulated, unleashed:
FA* 85/1.4: $500 to $800 depending on condition
ROTFL
I'd say $500 to $1500.
Really.
Apologies Mark, I was thinking of the A* 85, not the FA*.
(my excuse: moving house and living amongst 75% of the world's cardboard
supply).
I thought I said that.
I'd debate lesser quality ... I suspect that if you have a decent
printer, printing the manual from a PDF file will prove to be higher
quality than the booklet provided by Pentax with the camera.
I never use the printed manual however. It's much easier to search
Butch, it all depends on whether you can get XP drivers for the peripheral.
When I upgraded my desktop to XP Pro, I had to move my flatbed scanner to
another PC as the manufacturer would not provide a driver.
http://www.windowsxp-drivers.com/ is a good site for a starting point to
obtain
You can order original printed manuals from Pentax as well.
Shel
On Jan 31, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
Or for free, though lesser quality, from the Pentax USA site:
http://www.pentaximaging.com/files/manual/istD_IB.pdf
On 31 Jan 2006 at 13:23, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I thought I said that.
I'd debate lesser quality ... I suspect that if you have a decent
printer, printing the manual from a PDF file will prove to be higher
quality than the booklet provided by Pentax with the camera.
True, the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just looked at the GFM site.
Feb 3 is the new date for the form.
It's a trick!
Hi Boris,
I should have exposed one more stop. Thanks to the comments
here I think the whole thing needs to be redone. Will give it
another shot when I'm in Chinatown next.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 1/31/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
No name and no Pentax content either. This
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re: PESO - Soft
Not bad. The effect is pretty good, but not exactly like a soft focus
lens. I have seen many attempts with PS to duplicate and have yet to
see the same thing. I suspect one issue is that when the picture is
taken,
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: OT: Chinese Manfrotto copies?
Take a look at these cheap tripod heads.
Aren't they Manfrotto copies?
At very low prices!
I wonder if this is legal?
http://tinyurl.com/7d93q
Connection refused when trying to connect to tinyurl.com.
I
Hi,
Have you seen the PDF manuals on the Pentax site. All that I've seen are
like this wrt quality:
http://www.pentaximaging.com/files/manual/K1000.pdf
I don't think quality is a word to describe these files ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
I'd debate lesser quality
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: PESO: (Panorama Ever So Often)
What you are suggesting can do this as well - perhaps in a less annoying
way.
Do you know of a tool that can do this, please let me know. I'm
interested!
Why not just stitch your panorama together
Jostein wrote:
Maybe he needs Java?
Jostein
Indeed. No java enabled on my machines. Not allowed at work and I am
not happy having it on my home machines. I also don't allow tinyurl to
send me ads, so that doesn't work either. Sorry, Jens, but I'm out.
- Original Message -
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Who said it was junk? Who said it is inappropriate to offer it as a PESO?
If you're implying that I said that, or that anyone here said that, the
implication is dead wrong, and I am somewhat miffed at the idea that you
think I said or implied any such thing. In fact,
On 1/31/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just looked at the GFM site.
Feb 3 is the new date for the form.
It's a trick!
Yeah, there only telling that to Canadians and other foreigners...
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.
Gautam,
I've noticed this thread, but didn't check the content 'til just now.
This is likely not a new thought, but have you tried concentrating on
the center figures, using a small aperture and side lighting to give
depth and definition to their features?
Jack
--- Gautam Sarup [EMAIL
On 31 Jan 2006 at 16:25, William Robb wrote:
Why not just stitch your panorama together and put it up as a jpeg file on
an html page, just like an ordinary picture. It will be wider than most
screens, but can be maneuvered through with sideways scrolling.
It's hard to please everybody in
Received this today and it makes good sense. Bob S.
It only takes a minute to read this-
Recognizing a Stroke
A neurologist says that if he can get to a stroke victim within 3 hours he
can totally reverse the effects of a stroke...totally. He said the trick
was getting a stroke recognized,
Yes, I misunderstood. You were apparently labeling java as junk. My
apologies.
Paul
On Jan 31, 2006, at 5:28 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Who said it was junk? Who said it is inappropriate to offer it as a
PESO? If you're implying that I said that, or that anyone here said
This is exactly as I see it. It is a challenge -and a lot of fun - to
select a picture meeting the monthly subject.
It is almost like a real photo club where you come together each month
and discuss each others pictures.
I do support upgrading of image size to 800 max (if this can be
accomodated
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jens Bladt
Take a look at these cheap tripod heads.
Aren't they Manfrotto copies?
At very low prices!
I wonder if this is legal?
http://tinyurl.com/7d93q
Connection refused when trying to connect to tinyurl.com.
I wish people would just paste the
On Jan 31, 2006, at 14:02, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Called up the camera shop. It was a Minolta X-700.
I haven't done a direct comparison, but it seems no less bright
than the stock -DS screen. It could even be brighter (and would
explain the propensity for the camera to underexpose
But perhaps read these first...
http://www.snopes.com/medical/disease/stroke.asp
http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=52795
Keith McG
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Received this today and it makes good sense. Bob S.
It only takes a minute to read this-
Recognizing a Stroke
A
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: Put the credit cards away folks.Feb 3 is the new date.
It's a trick!
Yeah, there only telling that to Canadians and other foreigners...
Like as if any of us could unseat Charles Braswell.
William Robb
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 11:25:25AM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I don't understand the point of what you're doing. It would be simpler to
have a panorama that one could scroll through, left to right. It seems like
an exercise in technology more than anything else. Speaking for myself,
the
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
