He's giving away hearts to coax people into not wearing fur?
That's a bit macabre.
Dave
On 4/2/06, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4285748
>
> Thanks for looking and commenting!
>
> cheers,
> frank
> --
> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."
On 1/4/06, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12858
>
>What do you say?
Well done Boris, the beautiful composition.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
__
On 1/4/06, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4285748
>
>Thanks for looking and commenting!
Real heart in that shot Frank :-)
Excellent pic.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnap
I just saw the March issue of Photography Monthly (UK magazine)
on a bookstore shelf.
It has a rubric "[UK pound]150 challenge" where a photographer goes
shooting on such a budget.
One of the two photographers was using an MX with A50/1.7.
I thought some people on the list might like this inform
On 1/4/06, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
>What date does your replicant have in mind?
The Bob W replicant can answer that as he first mooted the the thought.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
__
My first lot of images for the day are downloading as I read this and I
thought, "Yes I should change the time."
I sometimes think I should set it to UTC and just leave it there.
Leon
http://www.bluering.org.au
http://www.bluering.org.au/leon
Derby Chang wrote:
Don't forget to change the
Thanks Boris. I would have liked to have given her a card, but I ran
out. I'll probably never see her again.
Paul
On Apr 2, 2006, at 12:09 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
One more from today's trip into town. Again, the FA 40/1.4. This time
at an ap and shutter speed that show off the lens:
This is a crop, so it's actually shot from about a meter further away
than it appears to be. I'll have to look at it again, but it felt
better tight when I was processing it.
Paul
On Apr 2, 2006, at 12:07 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Thanks for looking, Frank. Maybe you had to be there :-).
Hi!
Nevertheless, it's very enjoyable to look out over Paris from the top.
Eiffel's daughter had her honeymoon night at the top of the tower. She and
her new husband were the first people to enjoy the tower in that particular
way.
I wonder if Sigmund Freud ever had anything to say about a w
Hi!
One more from today's trip into town. Again, the FA 40/1.4. This time at
an ap and shutter speed that show off the lens: f6.7 @ 1/180th. This
was going to be BW, but the skin tones, the dog's fur, and the orange
sweater changed my mind. That's one think I like about digital: no
commitmen
Hi!
Thanks for looking, Frank. Maybe you had to be there :-). Actually,
she's preening, patting her hair in place before I shoot. The menu is
partly visible in the foreground, but including more of it seemed to
disturb the balance of the shot.
It's not working for me. For one thing, she loo
Hi!
Nope. I actually cropped this one (note: no black borders...). I
debated leaving that partial person in there, but I actually preferred
it there for some odd reason. To me it lends a certain dynamic to the
scene.
Thanks for looking and commenting.
This is interesting... Because I see
Personally, having been to both many times, I prefer the Museo de
Orsay across the river from the Louvre.
But the Museo Picasso is my favorite.
Godfrey
On Apr 1, 2006, at 7:15 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Amazing ... !
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Cesar
Went to the Louvre, never went i
On Apr 1, 2006, at 3:48 PM, John Forbes wrote:
Thank you. The two buildings shown are roughly a hundred years
apart. Have those years brought any improvements in architecture?
Have the last two thousand years? Save for the Taj Mahal, can any
later building compare with the Parthenon?
I
Hi!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fwwidall/120926405/
I spent my lunchtime wandering around campus with my *istDS, tripod and
Hoya R72. Got some quite nice shots, including this one.
*istDS, SMC 35mm (screwmount), ISO 1600, 1/20s, F3.5, tripod mounted.
Converted to B&W in PS.
What do you thi
Would certainly make me nervous... !!
Godfrey
On Apr 1, 2006, at 5:43 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Shot at Monterey Aquarium - not sure how I'd feel in open water having
one of these guys swimming so close.
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 16mm, Handheld
ISO 3200, 1/10 sec @ f/4.0
http://www.daytonphot
Thought about that. But I wanted to preserve the young lady's legs:-).
Paul
On Apr 1, 2006, at 10:17 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Paul Stenquist" Subject: PESO:
Puppy Luv
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4285825
Also, it could stand a tighter cr
Thanks Bill. I didn't know what kind of dog it was. Now I do:=).
Paul
On Apr 1, 2006, at 10:14 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: PESO: Puppy Luv
One more from today's trip into town. Again, the FA 40/1.4. This time
at an ap and shutter speed
- Original Message -
From: "Gautam Sarup"
Subject: Re: OT - Eiffel Tower
It's right here for people who haven't seen it:
http://static.flickr.com/41/81262041_a936315f02.jpg
Nice shot.
I'd probably have moved to the right far enough to exclude the building in
the background.
Also,
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: PESO: Puppy Luv
One more from today's trip into town. Again, the FA 40/1.4. This time at
an ap and shutter speed that show off the lens: f6.7 @ 1/180th. This was
going to be BW, but the skin tones, the dog's fur, and the orange s
Amazing ... !
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Cesar
> Went to the Louvre, never went in,
I prefer it from the inside, looking out. The Louvre is magnificent.
You have to go in.
Paul
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1546140&size=lg
On Apr 1, 2006, at 9:04 PM, Cesar wrote:
Paul,
You mean this little thing -
http://groups.msn.com/MyRugbyPictures/paris.msnw?
action=Show
This one grabs me enough to come out of lurk mode and comment. You've
outdone yourself on this one. If it were mine, there would be a large
print on my wall in a heartbeat!! This is art, not just another pretty
picture.
-P
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/docum
David Savage wrote:
On 4/2/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aaaagh!
Just what I needed. More temptation.
Just buy it. It's only money.
Give in to temptation.
Dave :-)
I agree with Dave. They got me too. I have a silver 43 on order. It
is good that they extende
Paul,
I agree with you along with the Chrysler Building. But then again I was
raised in NYC. I recall the WTC going up and the uproar in terms of it
being 'ugly'.
I always used it to get my bearings when coming out of the subway in
lower Manhattan,
César
Panama City, Florida
Paul Stenqu
Paul,
You mean this little thing -
http://groups.msn.com/MyRugbyPictures/paris.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=59
?
Went to the Louvre, never went in,
César
Panama City, Florida
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Of course the pyramid at the Louvre is even more disparaged. However,
I kind of like it. _T
John Forbes wrote:
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 01:17:03 +0100, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Well it was the tallest structure in the world until they built the
empire state building in new york city.
A pedant writes: You mean the Chrysler Building.
The base has to be a couple of
city blo
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Shot at Monterey Aquarium - not sure how I'd feel in open water having
one of these guys swimming so close.
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 16mm, Handheld
ISO 3200, 1/10 sec @ f/4.0
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2938.htm
Comments welcome
Mako shark?
At first I thought
Collin,
It varies a little bit for me. There are times that I have not taken
any shots for a while (more than a week) and I find myself wanting to go
out and shoot. Rare are the times that I do not take a shot, but just
carrying the camera in my hand makes me pay better attention to what is
It is a very beautiful photo. True minimalism would have only one
bird, however . . . .
On 4/1/06, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One can't say much about minimalism...
>
> But that's a very beautiful photo.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Bob
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Boris Liberman [ma
Thanks for the kind remark, Malcolm.
Dan M
On 3/30/06, Malcolm Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another brilliant showing but I do have three equal favourites:
>
> Missing the show - Dan Matyola
>
> Jumble of floats - Harald Rust
>
> It's cleaning time - Boris Liberman
>
> Thanks for cheeri
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 09:55:36AM +1000, Derby Chang wrote:
> John Forbes wrote:
> >On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 00:18:44 +0100, Gautam Sarup
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>It's right here for people who haven't seen it:
> >
> >Thank you. The two buildings shown are roughly a hundred years apart.
I did a PUG entry some time ago featuring the Eiffel Tower:
http://pug.komkon.org/00sep/00sept/Et1.html
On 3/31/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Viewpoints towards art and artists change... Interesting short from "The
> Writer's Almanac":
>
> Today is the anniversary of the official opening
On 4/2/06, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you say?
>
> Boris
I hate you.
;-)
Seriously, it's a great shot. Well done.
Dave
--
"All I ask is the chance to prove that money can't make me happy." -
Spike Milligan
On 4/2/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I see.
> I suspect your real name is Jones or something and "Savage" is just a
> nickname...
> ;-)
>
:-)
I am in no way affiliated with the David Jones outlets.
Dave
--
"All I ask is the chance to prove that money can't make me happy." -
Sp
That's very patriotic of you, Derby; the SOH is certainly eye-catching.
John
On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 00:55:36 +0100, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 00:18:44 +0100, Gautam Sarup
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's right here for people who haven't
David Savage wrote:
>On 4/2/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Aaaagh!
>> Just what I needed. More temptation.
>
>Just buy it. It's only money.
>
>Give in to temptation.
I see.
I suspect your real name is Jones or something and "Savage" is just a
nickname...
;-)
On 4/2/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaaagh!
> Just what I needed. More temptation.
>
Just buy it. It's only money.
Give in to temptation.
Dave :-)
--
"All I ask is the chance to prove that money can't make me happy." -
Spike Milligan
The two faces tell it all. Nice capture Paul.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO: Puppy Luv
One more from today's trip into town. Again, the FA 40/1.4. This time
at an ap and shutter speed that show off the lens: f6.7 @ 1/18
I worked in New York for a dozen years. To me, the Empire State
building always was and always will be the iconic New York structure.
Paul
On Apr 1, 2006, at 6:54 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:48:40 -0800
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
Tom C wrote:
I haven't ever really thought about it
Doh, finger malfunction. That should be FA 50/1.4, of course, But you
knew that:-).
Paul
On Apr 1, 2006, at 5:35 PM, John Forbes wrote:
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 21:52:07 +0100, Paul Stenquist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One more from today's trip into town. Again, the FA 40/1.4. This time
at an ap
Of course the pyramid at the Louvre is even more disparaged. However, I
kind of like it. _The DaVinci Chronicles_ probably helped make it more
palatable. The book gave it a reason to exist, albeit a fictional one.
On Apr 1, 2006, at 5:33 PM, John Forbes wrote:
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 22:05:38 +0100
Thanks, Kostas. I do try to have my camera ready for the prevailing
conditions. But If I see a shot, I press the shutter, and worry about
the numbers afterward:-).
Paul
On Apr 1, 2006, at 5:19 PM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Paul Stenquist wrote:
At 1/15th, there's probabl
Thanks Tim. This was one of those I spotted, and just shot away before
asking. She didn't seem to mind. Spoke to her briefly after the fact.
Paul
On Apr 1, 2006, at 5:10 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Pretty good. Both are cute. Relaxed nice pose, the colours, nice
texture in
the bench, the woman's clos
I really enjoyed this shot. I wanted to study it further before
commenting, but someone deleted the URL:-(. That's a no-no on PESO or
PAW posts. Shel, can you admonish them? In any case, nice work,
Ken.
Paul
On Apr 1, 2006, at 5:05 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Bob -
I mean Bob S,
Dragonflies
John Forbes wrote:
On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 00:18:44 +0100, Gautam Sarup
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's right here for people who haven't seen it:
Thank you. The two buildings shown are roughly a hundred years apart.
Have those years brought any improvements in architecture? Have the
last tw
Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:48:40 -0800
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
> Tom C wrote:
>> I haven't ever really thought about it as ugly or beautiful until now.
>> I'd probably land on the positive side of it's aesthetics.
>> It's hard to imagine Paris w/o it though. Like London w/o Big Ben,
>> Seattle w/o the S
Good decision! A very endearing shot helped by a pleasing combination
of colors.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One more from today's trip into town. Again, the FA 40/1.4. This time
>
> at an ap and shutter speed that show off the lens: f6.7 @ 1/180th.
> This was going t
On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 00:18:44 +0100, Gautam Sarup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
It's right here for people who haven't seen it:
Thank you. The two buildings shown are roughly a hundred years apart.
Have those years brought any improvements in architecture? Have the last
two thousand years?
The building in the foreground is the Sentinel Building, and is owned by
Francis Ford Coppola, and at least at one time was home to the offices of
American Zoetrope, Frankie's film production company. I think the offices
are still there. On the ground floor is a neat little cafe - Cafe
Niebaum-Co
It's right here for people who haven't seen it:
http://static.flickr.com/41/81262041_a936315f02.jpg
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/1/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The building is not quite in North Beach. It's actually on the edge of
> Chinatown, and very close to the Financial District.
Hey it's the first thing I thought of. Sure the GG Bridge is more iconic.
In my mind's eye I was envisioning city skylines. :-)
Tom C.
From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - Eiffel Tower
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006
Thanks for the clarification Ken. I looked at that image 4 times
before commenting. It is compelling in many ways.
It took me a while to see it as dew on the dragonfly.
The dew makes it unique, but adds some visual distraction.
I wish the dew was a bit more 'fine grained' (smaller drops?).
But
Very striking image Boris - I like it.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 4:14 AM
Subject: PESO - Minimalism
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12858
What do you say?
Boris
Boris,
You are getting too damned good!
Stop showing us these great photos.
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/1/06, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12858
>
> What do you say?
>
> Boris
>
>
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 21:52:07 +0100, Paul Stenquist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One more from today's trip into town. Again, the FA 40/1.4. This time at
an ap and shutter speed that show off the lens: f6.7 @ 1/180th. This
was going to be BW, but the skin tones, the dog's fur, and the orange
Super picture.
John
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 21:12:59 +0100, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
What do you say?
Only that I like it alot.
Is that minimal enough?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message - From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Minimalism
Hi!
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 22:05:38 +0100, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think more peoplw would consider the Golden Gate Bridge to be
the iconic structure for San Francisco. While I'm sure there are
many people who can remember the City by the Bay without the bridge,
it's been around a l
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Paul Stenquist wrote:
At 1/15th, there's probably a
wee bit of camera shake. Should have opened up a stop perhaps, but the moment
was quickly passing.
That was the point I was wanting to make: at 1/15 I don't even bother
to press the shutter with a 50 *on 135 film*.
Hat
Pretty good. Both are cute. Relaxed nice pose, the colours, nice texture in
the bench, the woman's closed eyes makes me sense her affection for the dog,
the hand in her lap makes a nice counterpoint (I'm sure if thats the best
word) in the composition.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Bob -
I mean Bob S,
Dragonflies are among my favorite creatures. I've photographed them many
times, not been fast enough to catch them many more times, and seen a few
covered in dew first thing in the morning.
I had quite a bit of time in a small field of sleeping Darners. As the sun
ros
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12858
What do you say?
Boris
Good.
8-)
John Francis wrote:
I think more peoplw would consider the Golden Gate Bridge to be
the iconic structure for San Francisco. While I'm sure there are
many people who can remember the City by the Bay without the bridge,
it's been around a little longer that the TransAmerica building.
On Fri,
Mea Culpa!*
No mistake on your part, a calculation and rounding error mistake:
APS film formats are
H=9:16 - 17x30
C=2:3 - 17x25.5
P=1:3 - 10x30
It's all on the Kodak page I listed. I transcribed the numbers too
quickly, wrote the wrong proportion for P format, calculated and
didn't proof-
I think more peoplw would consider the Golden Gate Bridge to be
the iconic structure for San Francisco. While I'm sure there are
many people who can remember the City by the Bay without the bridge,
it's been around a little longer that the TransAmerica building.
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 11:48:40P
That's an exceptional lens.
But ... for anyone interested ... I've found an A200/2.8.
Anyone ???
Let me know soon!
Collin
At 03:45 PM 4/1/2006, you wrote:
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 11:13:40 -0700
From: Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Remarkable lens for sale
On Apr 1, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Thanks to all who took the time to comment - Bob S, Bruce, Jack,
William R, Hank, David S., Frank, Bob S., Boris, Tom C., & David B.
Which Bob S is which? ;-)
FWIW - this was taken with available light - no photons were harmed
in its pro
I think you may be onto something here. I don't do a lot of flash
photography, and when I am using flash it's still my old AF500FTZ.
But I always used to wonder about these complaints; I've never
considered the combination to be unreliable.
But now, on reading your post, I'm reminded that I did
One more from today's trip into town. Again, the FA 40/1.4. This time
at an ap and shutter speed that show off the lens: f6.7 @ 1/180th.
This was going to be BW, but the skin tones, the dog's fur, and the
orange sweater changed my mind. That's one think I like about digital:
no commitment on t
The DL was aimed at a market segment totally dominated by price.
I'd bet that well over 90% of DL purchasers will never own any
flash other than the pop-up flash on the camera.
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 01:07:54PM +0200, Dario Bonazza wrote:
> Yes, P-TTL.
>
> My point is that, before exploring the
Thanks for looking, Frank. Maybe you had to be there :-). Actually,
she's preening, patting her hair in place before I shoot. The menu is
partly visible in the foreground, but including more of it seemed to
disturb the balance of the shot.
Paul
On Apr 1, 2006, at 3:38 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On 4/1/06, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Er, hmmm should be LH side.
I knew whatcha meant.
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 4/1/06, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank,
> I looked & the only thing that strikes me is the inclusion of the person on
> the
> RH side. Probably a no crop thing huh?
>
Nope. I actually cropped this one (note: no black borders...). I
debated leaving that partial person in
Er, hmmm should be LH side.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: PAW - Solitary Protester
Frank,
I looked & the only thing that strikes me is the inclusion of the person
on the
RH si
Paul Stenquist -
"I can handle a Coney dog every now and then.
But Kwami looks like he's a frequent customer".
I also like them but not @ 2AM in Detroit!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Queen For A Day
Thanks for looking,
On 4/1/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I went into town this afternoon with my sister, who is visiting from
> Arizona. Since she never had a Detroit Coney Dog, I took her to what we
> call a "Coney" for lunch. Coneys sell hot dogs with chili on them and
> various other fattening thi
Frank,
I looked & the only thing that strikes me is the inclusion of the person on
the
RH side. Probably a no crop thing huh?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PAW - Solitary Protester
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=
Interesting shot. Lonely crusade. Was he wearing leather shoes?
On Apr 1, 2006, at 3:25 PM, frank theriault wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4285748
Thanks for looking and commenting!
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Thanks for looking, Ken. I can handle a coney dog every now and then.
But Kwami looks like he's a frequent customer.
Blowing up the hi-res tiff, I can see that the eyes and the crown are
both equally sharp or, if you will, equally soft. At 1/15th, there's
probably a wee bit of camera shake. Shou
Thanks to all who took the time to comment - Bob S, Bruce, Jack, William R,
Hank, David S., Frank, Bob S., Boris, Tom C., & David B.
FWIW - this was taken with available light - no photons were harmed in its
production.
Yes that is dew, happily supplied by a cool damp night & getting there
ear
On 4/1/06, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12858
>
> What do you say?
>
Beautiful!
Just beautiful.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4285748
Thanks for looking and commenting!
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Nice capture Paul, but a little soft in the focus on the face. Looks like
the focus is somewhat behind her face (the crown looks in focus to me.)
BTW, Mayor Kilpatrick, of Detroit, said recently one of the greatest things
about Detroit was the ability to get a Coney Dog @ 2 AM.
I think I'll p
I went into town this afternoon with my sister, who is visiting from
Arizona. Since she never had a Detroit Coney Dog, I took her to what we
call a "Coney" for lunch. Coneys sell hot dogs with chili on them and
various other fattening things, like chili cheese fries and some Greek
fast food lik
What do you say?
Only that I like it alot.
Is that minimal enough?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Minimalism
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12858
What do you say?
Boris
Beautiful. An experiment that succeeded. Congratulations.
On Apr 1, 2006, at 12:31 PM, Bob W wrote:
One can't say much about minimalism...
But that's a very beautiful photo.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April 2006 19:15
To
Hi Bruce,
I it at 200 and 400 without any compensation. But I always use an omni
reflector or soft box attachment.
Paul
On Apr 1, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello Paul,
When using the 400T, do you dial in any negative compensation? Also
what ISO's have you tried it with. I have
Wonderful photograph! I wouldn't crop a pixel anywhere, I think it's
perfect just as it is. And I agree, this is art, and very well done
at that.
*>UncaMikey
On 4/1/06, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12858
What do you say?
Boris
What date is it today?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Tainter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 1. april 2006 20:14
I say:
This is a seductive image. (Translated to Norwegian thats a compliment, I
hope it is in English too)
Brilliant idea, very well executed. Simple and elegant.
This is the best photo I've seen from you Boris ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of s
Hi!
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12858
What do you say?
Boris
Ooooh. Aaaah. With this shot you've transcended mere photography and
created a piece of art.
Tom, you make me loose a gift of speech.
Good thing, I still have a gift of touch-typing ;-).
But thanks! I will pr
On 2006-04-01, at 19:43, Jostein wrote:
Chiming in late on this one...
"Better late than never" as Englishmen used to say ;-)
Congrats, Sylwek!
Thanks!
Sounds like your intial experience with the A* is very similar to
mine. I'm sure
you will be happy with it. :-)
I already am (don't even
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12858
What do you say?
Boris
Ooooh. Aaaah. With this shot you've transcended mere photography and
created a piece of art.
Tom C.
Very very nice.
On 4/1/06, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12858
>
> What do you say?
>
> Boris
>
>
Respecting that someone on the list might want it I won't
divulge the location. Somewhere in the world, right now, on
eBay, there is a 300 mm. F1.4 lens for sale in Pentax mount.
At least that is what the listing says.
Joe
Mark Roberts wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't use flash, so I cannot recommend this from personal experience,
however, a few people I know have suggested a product called
"Digital Flash Powder"
Made by a company known a
It sounds almost like a simple software oversight involving 3rd grade
mathematics.
Tom C.
From: Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: DL TTL flash madness
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 17:24:51 +0200
I doubt the connector is the proble
keith_w wrote:
Bob W wrote:
-Original Message-
From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 April
2006 18:11
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Bailing out.
Bob W wrote:
But, Keith, look at the opportunities:
http://mat.gsia.cmu.edu/POB/DEC0998/0519.html
Kostas (Si
Hi Ken,
I think it's a good shot. They often let the wings fall towards the ventral side
so that it's difficult to get the whole wing into focus at the same time. IMO,
it looks like a good trade-off between DOF and blurred background.
Still, I do think the background is a bit busy. Not in texture
Extremely nice! I say; could use a slight crop on the left side.
Jack
--- Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12858
>
> What do you say?
>
> Boris
>
>
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Y
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
