Yes I misread that one. Most likely because its
A double negative. Most satisfactory would have
Have been just as easy but you don't want you
Use anything but the term unsatisfactory in your
posts on the Issue of course.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
My manner on the deal wasn't questionable
Either, People should not think because
Of the rude stuff posted this week means
That old ebay deal was handled in same
Manner, it WASN'T.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tom C
Sent: Wednesday,
HOW many times do I have to rebut this? I wasn't
Rude to him in the emails, He didn't email me
Any complaint until well after he got it and I
Told him that is not acceptable behavior because
Its too easy for someone to damage an item and
Then claim it came that way and he freaked out
Saying I
Screw you, he may not have been satisfied
But If I did the very best any seller can
Do which is offer a full reversal of the
Deal and let him buy another one elsewhere
Than he really has no right to be unsatisfied.
I cant guarantee him or any other psycho
Is going to be satisfied ( He was
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/25 Wed PM 11:06:01 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Your first camera
mike wilson wrote:
Being good with colours and having high spatial awareness would be
prime
attributes of a good hunter.
Look I really don't care if anyone on the list buys
Stuff from me, what got me so upset is that its
A personal attack on my character to say my ebay
Selling is in anyway unfair to anyone. That's my
Point in the whole matter.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Op Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:02:00 +0200 schreef mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/25 Wed PM 11:06:01 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Your first camera
mike wilson wrote:
Being good with colours and having high
From: John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's happening as we speak. Camera shops are closing all over the US,
according to one of the last industry newsletters I saw before being laid
off, and even big chains like Ritz/Wolf are closing dozens of stores.
People are treating cameras like
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/26 Thu AM 02:53:50 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: USA tour 2004 now online
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday,
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/26 Thu AM 01:15:02 GMT
snip But you are ever the contrarian, snip
Is that similar to, but not exactly like, a libertarian? I get so confused by
US politics.
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Another long due travel gallery, from a trip I made
in October 2005 from Washington DC, to the west and south.
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?list=12
Traveling through Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, West-Virginia,
Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Arkansas,
On 26/10/06, J. C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
Look I really don't care if anyone on the list buys
Stuff from me, what got me so upset is that its
A personal attack on my character to say my ebay
Selling is in anyway unfair to anyone. That's my
Point in the whole matter.
I wouldn't
From: Lucas Rijnders (Privé) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/26 Thu AM 08:09:24 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Your first camera
Op Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:02:00 +0200 schreef mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
John Celio wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Snowflake_300um_LTSEM,_13368.jpg
Now, when do you think Pentax will come out with a macro lens that can do
that?
[...]
Hi John,
This is on the order of Hey! You brought it up! ;-)
Starting with the site above, which really whetted my
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:30:55 +0100, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes I misread that one. Most likely because its
A double negative. Most satisfactory would have
Have been just as easy but you don't want you
Use anything but the term unsatisfactory in your
posts on the Issue of
On 25/10/06, John Celio, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Snowflake_300um_LTSEM,_13368.jpg
Now, when do you think Pentax will come out with a macro lens that can do
that?
That is astonishing. I'm an atheist but it's difficult to look at that
photo and not perceive
From: SJ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/26 Thu AM 04:43:46 GMT
To: PDML pdml@pdml.net
Subject: the LX wink...
ok, since i am still a stranger to pentax lore and pdml humour, what
exactly is the story around the lx wink?
i have read around, about the sticky mirror thingy, about the
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:04:00 +0100, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/26 Thu AM 01:15:02 GMT
snip But you are ever the contrarian, snip
Is that similar to, but not exactly like, a libertarian? I get so
confused by US politics.
The irony is that everytime somebody asks people to stop adding to the
thread, they are themselves adding to it.
If you don't want others to post, take your own advice!
John
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:14:46 +0100, Peter Jordan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know the words Cotty and understated
On 25/10/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
One other time, the owner had a customer who wanted some advice on
digital cameras so he could make a more intelligent purchasing decision
in the Internet. Yes, he actually said that to the owner's face as if
there was nothing unusual or
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/26 Thu AM 08:50:02 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:04:00 +0100, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: John Forbes [EMAIL
On 26/10/06, SJ, discombobulated, unleashed:
ok, since i am still a stranger to pentax lore and pdml humour, what
exactly is the story around the lx wink?
i have read around, about the sticky mirror thingy, about the camera's
'pro' aspirations which didn't quite materialise...but i still can't
On 26/10/06, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
The irony is that everytime somebody asks people to stop adding to the
thread, they are themselves adding to it.
If you don't want others to post, take your own advice!
Right.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:42:35 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/10/06, John Celio, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Snowflake_300um_LTSEM,_13368.jpg
Now, when do you think Pentax will come out with a macro lens that can
do
that?
That is
hi mike,
thanks. i'll go ahead and get it. i want the wink... now :)
regards, subash
On 10/26/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The LX has more than one feature that is unusual. Together in one body, the
result is a unique photographic device. You could say this about many
thanks cotty...i join the previleged few in about three hours and
twenty minutes, when i get off the desk... :))
regards, subash
On 10/26/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subers dear chap.
The LX wink. Well, let's just saythat it's the very quiet
satisfaction you get with owning and
I can't even put that photo into perspective. To me it looks like a piece
of machinery. I can't reconcile that with a snowflake
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Snowflake
On
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:09:00 +0100, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/26 Thu AM 08:50:02 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:04:00
Op Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:27:08 +0200 schreef J and K Messervy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Snowflake
On 25/10/06, John Celio, discombobulated, unleashed:
Welcome to the brethren (even if a bit early). I've
rather enjoyed mine over the past two years.
--- SJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks cotty...i join the previleged few in about
three hours and
twenty minutes, when i get off the desk... :))
regards, subash
On 10/26/06, Cotty [EMAIL
I agree. Well seen. That's a shot that many would of missed. Great work.
Paul
On Oct 25, 2006, at 10:44 PM, William Robb wrote:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/misc/misc16e.htm
Excellent picture Dario.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
When my K10D finally arrives, I'm trying to decide which lens to get with
it.
My ist DL came with the Sigma 18-50, so the bar has been set pretty low.
I gather the Pentax 18-55 is quite a bit better.
My question is, is the Pentax 16-45 a big enough improvement over the 18-55
to warrent the
hi jon,
thanks. it may be take a couple of days to actually lay my hands on
the thing but, after reading so much about it (there is quite a bit on
the Net too), i am looking forward to it...
regards, subash
On 10/26/06, Jon Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome to the brethren (even if a bit
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/26 Thu AM 09:45:32 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:09:00 +0100, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: John Forbes [EMAIL
I think the answer really depends on what you photograph, the size prints
you make (if you even make prints), and your personal standards. I've used
both, although the 18-55 for only a few hours at the most. I had a 16-45
for about a month.
The 18-55 is a very good value, and a better, if not a
We didn't have much of a problem leaving Athens for the US. There were
about three layers of security, ending with a thorough hand-check of
all hand baggage at the gate. They were very strict about the no
liquids rule, although Nate and I were able to bring little bottles of
contact lens solution
I know it's only 2 mm but I moved from the 18-55 to the 16-45 because of
them. and because of constant praise from many on the list for the quality
of the 16-45.
I have to say I haven't been disappointed but, then again, the 18-55 took good
photos too. So, if you don't need those extra 2
I'm selling a lens that I love, but in fact have rarely found use for
in my amateur needs, and have only used it twice: Pentax super wide
angle 14mm f/2.8 ED IF. It's in perfect condition, includes soft
case, front and rear caps, hood, and 77 mm UV filter, which I put on
the lens the day
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Cotty wrote:
XXX may be a nutty distant cousin to the devil, but YYY is no angel
IMO.
Come on folks, what kind of crap is that.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:38:07 +0100, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When my K10D finally arrives, I'm trying to decide which lens to get
with
it.
Which lens? Singular? You're on the wrong list. Come back when you have
at least twenty. :-)
But to answer your question, the
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20061026131233
A portrait of Ashot, street artist who paints surreal...
--
new photos ever so often... http://roman.blakout.net/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Having owned both at one point (I currently have the 16-45), the 16-45
is certainly worth the extra cost. While the 18-55 is a good little
lens, and rather well built for a kit lens, the 16-45 has it beat in
useful range (That extra 2mm at the wide end really shows, the missing
10 at the long
I remembered your total refund offer, I just didn't recall that you offered
postage as well. But that doesn't change the way you communicated with me,
and that's the real issue here - your rude and abusive method of
communicating, that you accused me of damaging the lens, and that dealing
with
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, John Celio wrote:
They had money to burn, but the
way I saw it, they were too greedy to pay for the services I/we provided.
How many of them used the service? How many had already done the
research, asked for specific items then asked to pay?
wanted to punch them in the
keith_w wrote:
Information gained from studying the structure of snow is vital to
several areas of science as well as to activities that affect our daily
lives...
To me, most curious!
WHY is it so vital we study the structure of snow?
Does anyone know of a 'primer' that I can read, to
I flew to New York by Pan-Am the day before the same flight was blown up
over Lockerbie.
On my return (the flight was almost empty), security had been beefed up:
What's in that bag?
Cameras
Oh, that's fine.
Presumably I have an honest face, and the security woman thought I would
admit to
On Thursday 26 October 2006 03:31, David Savage wrote:
At 04:53 AM 26/10/2006, Frits Wüthrich wrote:
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 14:41, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
This is great news! Pentax has really outdone itself this time,
providing a large focal range zoom without the need for a lens.
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
Perhaps our intellectual capabilities are rather different, but I
don't
think a double negative is a very difficult concept to grasp. The
fact is
that the deal was
Recently a few messages here discussed the value of using good
punctuation and grammar in email messages. One of the participants made
comments to the effect that communication via email and on message boards
and mail lists was not important enough for him to take the time to add
apostrophes and
Let it go.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I remembered your total refund offer, I just didn't recall that you offered
postage as well. But that doesn't change the way you communicated with me,
and that's the real issue here - your rude and abusive method of
communicating, that you accused me
Thanks, Paul
The only real complaint I have with the Tamron 28-300 is the f6.3 on the
long end. So far it's been a good all around lens for shooting from the
wheelchair.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent:
Cotty wrote:
I am in the process of considering the purchase of an expensive lens,
with a choice of two similar types, at similar prices.. I was in London
and popped into a Canon dealer near the British Museum. When I inquired,
the best the salesman would do is show me prints from the lenses
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/26 Thu PM 12:03:25 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT Travelling heads-up
I flew to New York by Pan-Am the day before the same flight was blown up
over Lockerbie.
On my return (the flight was almost
James M should be looking at this ... Can't think of a better
starting point for an ultra-wide on the K10D.
Godfrey
On Oct 26, 2006, at 4:36 AM, Micah Kleit wrote:
I'm selling a lens that I love, but in fact have rarely found use for
in my amateur needs, and have only used it twice: Pentax
Butt out.
Stop slanderiing me with no evidence
Whatsover on the matter other than
The other partied self admitted incomplete
Memory of the resolution.
You were not involved and have no
Right to be continuing with this
Nonsense based on your incorrect
hunches.
JCO
-Original Message-
I'm lucky in that there are no less than four or five decent photo
equipment vendors within a 50 mile radius of my apartment, the
nearest two of whom are less than 15 minutes away. I try to buy from
them first whenever I'm looking for equipment as I believe in
supporting local business as
You've been carping on about this for a couple of day's now in a
public forum. If you don't want people to comment, take it off list.
Dave
On 10/26/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Butt out.
Stop slanderiing me with no evidence
Whatsover on the matter other than
The other
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Recently a few messages here discussed the value of using good
punctuation and grammar in email messages. One of the participants made
comments to the effect that communication via email and on message boards
and mail lists was not important enough for him to take the
On Oct 26, 2006, at 3:38 AM, J and K Messervy wrote:
When my K10D finally arrives, I'm trying to decide which lens to
get with
it.
Go classic: the DA21 Limited or FA35/2 AL would be perfect.
Heck with zooms. ;-)
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I can see the immediate merit of proper grammar and punctuation...
But then of course the precise reason why that very comma was
interpreted in that very way in the article you posted totally escapes
me. Probably some commas should have been inserted in the previous
message ;-).
Thanks!
On
It's fairly easy to understand, Kostas, and it isn't crap.
And Cotty isn't folks, he's Cotty. As English presumably isn't your
first language, I am sure you will not mind me pointing out that a final
s usually denotes a plural. As folk is a collective noun, it is
impossible to address a
And what is exactly wrong with a TOTAL
REFUND including all shipping costs
In the event of a dispute?
If he wasn't happy with the lens he
Didn't have to keep it but he did.
No, no one likes to return things but
When the return reason is questionable
( He expected PERFECT lens when
it was not
I WAS INVOLVED.
Y O U W E R E N ' T !
Its pure specualtive BS coming from you
At my expense. That's wrong.
BUTT OUT!
J C O
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Savage
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:54 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
Well the TOTAL refund INCLUDING postage
Costs both ways is as good as it gets
In the event of a dispute as it's a FULL
Reveral of the purchase which about the
Best possible policy ANYONE on ebay has
In the event a dispute.
Secondly, that lens had a very slight
Loosenees of the front filter ring
Whilst you persist in your unpleasant posts, I shall persist, when I feel
like it, to post in response, you impertinent guttersnipe.
And since you are posting to a public forum, I have EVERY right to comment.
And finally, which of my so-called hunches were incorrect? If you can
demonstrate
Dear John O'Connell,
If you want people to do something, try asking them politely. It usually
works.
Best wishes
John
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:11:44 +0100, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I WAS INVOLVED.
Y O U W E R E N ' T !
Its pure specualtive BS coming from you
At
Or maybe the 20-35? Some people here seem to like it
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Go classic: the DA21 Limited or FA35/2 AL would be perfect.
Heck with zooms. ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Oct 26, 2006, at 7:11 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Or maybe the 20-35? Some people here seem to like it
Go classic: the DA21 Limited or FA35/2 AL would be perfect.
Heck with zooms. ;-)
LOL ... You're evil, Shel. And I mean that in the nicest way. ];-)
Yes, the FA20-35 would definitely
STOP with this nonsense. That matter
Was between me and the other party
And it was NOT handled rudely or unfairly.
You keep seeming to make implications
That the other party must have been right
Based on my other recent unrelated posts
And that is NOT the case.
jco
-Original Message-
I can't comment on the 18-55, but the 16-45 is not bad for a zoom
lens. I tend to prefer primes myself.
I agree with Godfrey, go the prime lens route.
Dave
On 10/26/06, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When my K10D finally arrives, I'm trying to decide which lens to get with
it.
You arrogant sod.
Which part of:
If you don't want people to comment, take it off list.
...don't you understand?
By airing this in public you've made it a topic free for anyone to comment on.
Oh and by the way, what exactly was I speculating on in my last message?
Dave
On 10/26/06, J. C.
Give Kostas a break. He's good people. ;)
On 10/26/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's fairly easy to understand, Kostas, and it isn't crap.
And Cotty isn't folks, he's Cotty. As English presumably isn't your
first language, I am sure you will not mind me pointing out that a
I've been happy with the 18-55 (granted, my eyes aren't as critical as some).
For superwide, I'm saving for a DA12-24.
When looking for top quality, I flip over to the FA28 F50 primes.
dk
On 10/26/06, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When my K10D finally arrives, I'm trying to
If you want this to stop, then stop posting yourself. It's quite simple.
John
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:51:30 +0100, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
STOP with this nonsense. That matter
Was between me and the other party
And it was NOT handled rudely or unfairly.
You keep seeming
Hi gang...
I need a reasonably powerful flash to pair with my *ist DS for shooting
an event at my daughter's school, and a friend has been kind enough to
loan me his Metz 32CT4. He mentioned the possibility of a dedicated
module for Pentax, but the research I've done indicates that this works
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:02:55 +0100, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Give Kostas a break. He's good people. ;)
Don't you mean Kosta?
John
On 10/26/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's fairly easy to understand, Kostas, and it isn't crap.
And Cotty isn't folks, he's
True. IMO your paragraph should have read:
Recently, a few messages here discussed the value of using good
punctuation and grammar in email messages. One of the participants made
comments to the effect that communication via email, message boards,
and mail lists was not important enough
Recently a few messages here discussed the value of using good
punctuation and grammar in email messages. One of the participants made
comments to the effect that communication via email and on message
boards and mail lists was not important enough for him to take the time
to add apostrophes
I got the 16-45 in a kit with the D. It's a great lens. Almost as good
as primes.
Later I got the 18-55 for a bargain price and now I find myself
walking around with the 18-55 because it's also an excellent lens and
it's much smaller. And last but not least because I can use the popup
flash
Doug,
How about setting up another mailing list? It would be called the PRML
(Pentax Rant Mailing List). We could discuss Pentax photography stuff on
the PDML list and move the J.C. baiting and his abusive responses over to
the PRML. As a (mostly) reformed J.C. baiter (I got into it with
On Oct 25, 2006, at 8:21 PM, Juan Buhler wrote:
This is bad, but it also compunds itself when the salesperson becomes
wary of that. A couple of times, I felt the loss of interest of people
at places like KS in Palo Alto or Gassers in San Franciso, as soon as
they realize I'm not going to but
On Oct 26, 2006, at 8:20 AM, Timothy Sherburne wrote:
I need a reasonably powerful flash to pair with my *ist DS for
shooting
an event at my daughter's school, and a friend has been kind enough to
loan me his Metz 32CT4. He mentioned the possibility of a dedicated
module for Pentax, but
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:50:30 +0100, Joseph Tainter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...now we should return to discussing either jco or the swiss navy.
JCO and the Swiss Navy. Both equally improbable. But both, apparently,
exist. The truth is indeed stranger than fiction.
John
--
Using
I have two quibbles with the 16-45:
First, it is both bigger and heavier than the 24-90,
which was plenty big and heavy for me (don't look for
me to be carrying f/2.8 zooms around anytime soon!).
Second, it zooms backwards: barrel is all the way in
at 45mm, all the way out at 16mm. As Toine
Bill, as I read this post you basically claim to bully JCO in the name of a
greater good. Indirectly you also claim JCO to bully simply because he is a
dickhead (replace this with whatever abusive words you prefer). So you are
good, and he is bad.
Bill God. (Pardon my pun, but is so tempting to
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Scott Loveless wrote:
Give Kostas a break. He's good people. ;)
Thanks Scott. Forbes goes straight to /dev/null anyway.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks for the info, Godfrey. See comments below.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 26, 2006, at 8:20 AM, Timothy Sherburne wrote:
I need a reasonably powerful flash to pair with my *ist DS for
shooting
an event at my daughter's school, and a friend has been kind enough to
loan me his Metz
So difficult that I tend to disbelieve the caption.
Cotty wrote:
On 25/10/06, John Celio, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Snowflake_300um_LTSEM,_13368.jpg
Now, when do you think Pentax will come out with a macro lens that can do
that?
That is astonishing.
It makes them separate clauses. If it said, renewed for five years or
... it would make it a choice. As it reads it can only be ended after
each five year period if a one year notice is given. A clearer way of
saying it would have been, Will be automatically renewed for another
five year
I don't want it to continue any longer but
I am being forced to rebut the continuing
Insinuations and falsehoods being post.
He never should have posted it to the list
And this wouldn't being happening if he
Didn't.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Those two mushrooms look exactly the same in black white grin.
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/25 Wed PM 11:06:01 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Your first camera
mike wilson wrote:
Being good with colours and having
hey whats the big deal ee cummings did it years ago with his poetry and
became known for it whts next a discushun ov fonetic speling im going
bak to luk at snoflaks bwg oops r the nd kunsidrd punktooashun
mitch
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Recently a few messages here discussed the value of using
Listen ASSHOLE- my whole point of this
Thread was that it never should have
Been posted to the list. I am FORCED
To respond because it was and in a very
B.S. half-truth ( =lie ) manner.
You are an idiot if you think I wanted
Or like this topic but expect me to
Just say nothing when attacked
Hi!
It makes them separate clauses. If it said, renewed for five years or
... it would make it a choice. As it reads it can only be ended after
each five year period if a one year notice is given. A clearer way of
saying it would have been, Will be automatically renewed for another
five year
I actually like the extending zoom, as it allows you to shoot wide on
the street without people realizing, as it looks like you're zoomed in
to them. Dunno why you're complaining about the weight though, it's all
of 10 grams heavier than the 24-90 (365 grams to the 24-90's 355g). It
also
On 10/26/06, Timothy Sherburne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I dug through the Metz website this morning and found a PDF that
describes camera body compatibility with legacy flashes. The DS and
32CT4 are listed, and the SCA3702 and SCA3000C are needed to make them
work together.
I have a Metz
On Oct 26, 2006, at 9:18 AM, Timothy Sherburne wrote:
Yes, I dug through the Metz website this morning and found a PDF that
describes camera body compatibility with legacy flashes. The DS and
32CT4 are listed, and the SCA3702 and SCA3000C are needed to make them
work together.
Absolutely amazing isn't it? The one advantage a local place may have over
a mail order business, and they refuse to use it to their advantage. I
possibly would have expected there to be a test sample of each lens that was
purchased just for this reason.
I've never had a problem with a
Sorry, a big misinformation from my side, there are still 26 ships left ;-)
Markus
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: Markus Maurer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Oktober 2006 19:00
An: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Betreff: AW: [second try] K10D official prices in France
Hi
On 10/26/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:02:55 +0100, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Give Kostas a break. He's good people. ;)
Don't you mean Kosta?
Yes, Johns, that's exactly what I meant.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
Shoot more
1 - 100 of 245 matches
Mail list logo
