> >
> >
>
> __________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
--
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Are
> there any "fill in the blank" packages out there?
>
I've got a Java-based app on my computer, called JAlbum. I don't
remember where I found it, but a Google search should show it up. It
might be just what you are looking for. It's quite powerful.
--
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ing, I wondered if a vertical orientation would fill both demands.
You could get closer, and get more detail, yet, still get all the sky
and the water I don't know, it's just a thought, and a rather
off-the-wall one at that...
Personally, however, I like the big space in the photo...
;Pentax' of the camera industry.
Actually, my motive for writing what I did was (and if you know Dave
Pogue, you will understand) to appeal to his pro-Apple sentiments. By
drawing a parallel I hope to get him sympathetic or more sympathetic
to Pentax. :-) (Which happens to lack a "Steve Jobs")
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ver read the Calvin and Hobbes cartoon series about the
spinning propeller beanie? It was a hoot!
--
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
uite an impact, and, in fact, needs the rest of the
mountains to really make Mt. McKinley stand out in it's powerful
contrast. It is a wonderful panorama, perfect composition for the
format, I believe. Thanks for sharing it!
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hat I'd
> > > like to
> > > photograph. It's rusted metal and the background is green grass. I'd
> > > like
> > > to photograph it in such a way that the grass is much darker and the
> > > art
> > > work is lighter, resulting in more contrast between the two. Is this
> > > possible?
>
>
--
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
lds. iView Media allows for it,
but I can't do it from the Finder, which, IMO, would be ideal. It's
pretty handy to have, btw, even if you don't use everything, and even
if you don't use it now, to have it for future reference cannot hurt.
:-)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ve tanks through the sides of buildings
> and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during
> peacetime.
> --P.J. O'Rourke
>
>
--
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I was referring to the fact it was being videotaped, and you summed it
up quite nicely, like I figured you would. :-)
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:40:45 +, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14/1/05, Jon Glass, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Coty should be able to figure ou
se for any file where I know the year but not the date.
> The system is working for me. I can find anything on my drives in a minute or
> less.
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Keith
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> A somewhat unusualy look at an ordinary procedure. Shot weith the
> >> Leica iiif and the Summicron 50/2 on Tri-X, May 2002.
> >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1542429&size=lg
> >
>
>
--
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
under $10/each. People really like the fact
> they are getting prints.
>
> Kenneth Waller
>
>
> PeoplePC Online
> A better way to Internet
> http://www.peoplepc.com
>
>
--
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
zing I've heard, but
I don't want to be causing people problems. Or does this happen when
people click on links from email?
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
as thinking, and I can
bet that in your case, Greenspun has made an exception for you. He does
reserve the right, I believe, to make exceptions, and I bet he likes
what you do enough on Photo.net to make an exception, but not tell you.
:-)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and then I find myself making corny comments also, so
warning, you may find yourself in a corn field real quick it's
addictive.
url: <http://www.webaperture.com/>
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
it. :-) I figured it made it a bit easier to see
the whole thing, in their case. As far as I recall, it's the only PS
template that actually has an automatically advancing slide show.
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
h I could have
done better. In any case, the comments on this list to my photos have
certainly given me a more critical eye, and helped me see my need to
focus smaller, in a sense. For that, you all have my undying gratitude.
So, a seven-year-old photo or not, I enjoy it, and learn! :-)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I sure hope that's a distortion due to the perspective, and not snow!!!
That is an amazing photo! And I can't decide which version I prefer
On Jan 8, 2005, at 12:50 AM, Powell Hargrave wrote:
It got a bit white here today.
http://members.shaw.ca/hargravep/Image1.htm
--
-Jon Gl
.html)
and it took me quite some work to bring some red back into it, without
also destroying the yellow. I'm not so proficient in Photoshop, and I
thought I was going to pop before I got it near what I wanted. :-)
Again, thanks to all for your comments.
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
&l
On Jan 9, 2005, at 12:42 PM, Keith Whaley wrote:
Did you notice, this fella has a 6X6 or a 6X9 folder, in a well-used
Everready case, resting on his hip?
I was wondering if anybody would notice it! I thought it interesting
that I caught that! I bet he got some beautiful photos that day.
--
-Jon
much
about the event. :-(
Oh, and thanks for the comments, everybody!
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cupboard for five years, totally forgotten, so it was
not in the best of condition. :-(
<http://webaperture.com/gallery/showimg.php3?iid=54684&md=nw>
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
;s the point of "unstuffing" a Mac file for a Windows user?
Will
the program run on a Win machine?
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
the Classic days)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
nnot do anything with this file.
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Jan 6, 2005, at 7:25 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I was thinking of something on the order of 200mm to 300mm
Yeah, but I couldn't find anything that big I could afford. :-)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
this failure. ;-)
Let's just hope I won't be like Calvin and Hobbes "Live and don't
learn, that's our motto."
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
loration of the photo, trying to discern what
this fellow is doing adds to the pleasure of the discovery, so it's
hard for me to judge. I like your work, so I'm biased, I suppose. :-)
In any case, I don't think it should be tossed, but it does have some
elements that keep it from
ter scanner
will help in this regard. (I guess I'm still obsessed with this
image...)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
couldn't get a good shot. :-(
Thanks for the comments.
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
compression of the
foreground
while bringing the face closer?
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
" an image to
much may ultimately reduce the impact, or at least may not add to it
(been
there, done that :) )
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Speaking of oxymorons, has this ever been a theme for a monthly PUG?
sounds intriguing as a theme to me...
On Jan 4, 2005, at 6:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A living oxymoron:
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ere $1,300!!!). The only good part is that the Nikon D70
is the exact same price. :-) In any case, other than compact digicams,
or very exclusive camera stores, this is the first time I've seen a
Pentax dSLR.
Just had to share....
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
l be accumulating my email in my
Gmail box, so hopefully, I won't miss the important stuff.
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Jan 3, 2005, at 11:16 PM, Luigi de Guzman wrote:
A valid question, since, as I recall, CDs play from the centre
outwards.
Of course, it's only valid if you've never played a record before I
need to ask my kids what they would do...
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
18 month period, so it's not really that much.
I think the web site said that photos submitted for critique don't
count against your quota, so this could help if it's true...
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
petals shows through, due to the
backlighting. Nothing to be ashamed of, IMO. :-)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
to mine! strange coincidence) :-)
On Jan 2, 2005, at 5:47 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Yesterday we had rather summer weather - +26C at midday. So here is a
shot for you:
http://www.webaperture.com/gallery/photos/54189
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
then again, I'm not biased. The whole portfolio, honestly speaking
makes this soul envious of what you were able to do. Good stuff...
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
uot;extra" allowance; but your quota
will be at least your "basic" quota of 5, PLUS the number of photos
that you have submitted to the Photo Critique Forum for critique or
rating. So, in effect, photos that you submit to the Photo Critique
forum will not count against your quota."
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hen I bought it new.
Lets see some images when you can.
I can't imagine myself needing a lens like this, but it's a beauty!
However, if it's "rare" why? Does Pentax no longer make a lens this
big, or like this?
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
, and
I would like to sell this one for $70 USD. However, make an offer if
you think that's too high. :-)
Thanks for the consideration, and please feel free to ask any
questions, or ask for photos. I have a bunch of both lenses, and can
take more if necessary.
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
piles. Check here for more info:
<http://docs.gimp.org/en/ch02s08s03.html>
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ot in but I think it reflects
me (and Iowa) better than a house covered in
colored lights.
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ones that shot at
something like1/60 of a second, with f11, and fixed focus? Those don't
have meters (don't need them) nor electronics. Simple, mechanical cock
the shutter while advancing the film sort of things... I used them a
bunch while a kid. That's what got me into my fir
t even stupider (sic). :-) I got a lot of candid shots
this way. So, I don't qualify technically, but I do in spirit. ;-)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It is a beautiful photo, however... even if I am jealous.
:-)
On Dec 24, 2004, at 3:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We got about ten inches of new snow today in Michigan. A couple of
hours ago I snapped a pic in the garden:
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
inks
out to chill, and discovered it's a balmy day! I can't believe it's
Christmas Eve day, and it's this warm!!! And Krakow! Ho Ho Ho... jingle
bells and all that stuff...
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I committed a couple faux pax in my email. I forgot to mention where
the web sites lead, and I should have read the whole thread to see if
someone else had already mentioned it! Sorry.
On Dec 23, 2004, at 7:45 AM, Jon Glass wrote:
On Dec 22, 2004, at 6:33 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
An update on
out it here:
<http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/whibal.shtml>
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
do. Maybe not :-)
I think that stick's there to remind you it's a winter arrangement. :-)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Dec 22, 2004, at 1:29 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
check out the same url now (
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html ), I've
added an
equipment photo.
Ouch. That's a pretty penny! :-) Nice kit.
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
004, at 7:57 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, if *this* one ends up un-filtered, you should update your filter.
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A few days ago, I think this discussion came up, about how worthy it
was to consider using a digital camera to convert slides, etc. I just
last night discovered the following web page. It's pretty interesting.
:-)
<http://www.andromeda.com/people/ddyer/photo/slide-transfer.html>
--
more than several small CCDs of the equivalent
combined
area."
Sorry, but somehow, I didn't see that post But this is fascinating
information. :-) Thanks.
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
should say :-)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dependent, the effect can make some images look quite
un-natural.
In my case, I'm mostly concerned about reducing red channel noise from
skies from my digital camera, so I would suppose that a simple masking
and performing this on just the sky would not be too much of an issue.
Thanks!
--
and use the inverse to sharpen. I can email you
more specifically on this technique if you'd like.
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Dec 19, 2004, at 6:18 PM, Cotty wrote:
This parrot is dead:
<http://www.sfon.tv/Images/ringlogo_Dead_Parrot.jpg>
No, no, no, no 'e's _restin'_. ;-)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on their own. They certainly look like a pair, however. I wonder if you
could find them again, and try to "rescue" them with some food or
something. I can't imagine that they will do well this winter.
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
d light the comes in thru the window in mthe
office.
Nothing fancy or expensive.
I discovered the following page the other day. Your comments above
spurred my memory. Hope this helps a lot!
<http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/tips/tabletop.html>
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
;ve played with would seem to be consistent
with the behavior as described. It would also explain the 1/640 second
top speed...
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Their
mechanical shutter was the big limitation in their high shutter speed
of a mere 1/640 sec. time. The E20 also had an electronic-type shutter,
but it only captured every other line, and produced horrible
resolution. Sorry, for being AR... :-)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tion. ;-)
Divide the "Kup teraz" (buy it now) price of 3990zl by 3.1 to get the
approximate price in dollars In any case, I wonder how anyone could
afford that hunk of glass...
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
camera did. I
tried, and couldn't make a more pleasing result.
oh, url
<http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=358482>
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ut they almost
look familiar to me... Are they well-known? any idea who they are?
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ed much, although as someone else pointed out,
production cost and quality has improved a lot.
Kodak, I believe, makes full-field CCDs. I would think that was an
innovation...
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Dec 15, 2004, at 7:54 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Anybody need links to places that (still) sell film???
It's dead in the way that the poor folks in MP's "Search for the Holy
Grail" were dead...
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Dec 15, 2004, at 4:54 AM, frank theriault wrote:
My first thought was that he was a weather forecaster on TV or
something, but that's not exactly a weather map behind him.
And he's holding a pipe maybe a college professor?
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t right in line with the zoom point and shoot film cameras here.
Digital is coming here as well...
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Dec 14, 2004, at 11:33 PM, William Robb wrote:
I think I have shot 10 rolls of film in the past year, 8 of them, I
forced myself to shoot while on vacation.
Now, why did you do _that_??
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Dec 14, 2004, at 9:28 PM, wendy beard wrote:
Pros for the DRebel:
Availability
Price
You forgot one...
name not as stupid as *istDS ;-)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
only because it seems to be so
true!!!) ;-D
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
settings, in same light and from the
same spot.
I'm no expert, but I've seen stripes like that before on my wife's
Canon A60. I think it's an electronic problem, rather than optic. You
ought to take the camera back, and have it looked at/replaced. That's
my opinion.
--
Take a look at this-on Photo.net
<http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2949158>
Somebody else seems to have had the same idea. :-)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ound for a long time, and will even make a come-back of
sorts--but not like before. I shall, when I get the time, go read the
threads you mentioned. Thanks for the head's up.
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
anted, I did use a 3mp digicam, but I had the negative and slide mere
centimeters from the lens. I was actually surprised at some of the
detail I got (the texture on the man's sweater, including the dust, for
instance) but the truth is, it's nothing like what even my 1800 dpi
film scanner
bos and cheap film cameras. In fact, if I were
Kodak, I would be preparing marketing right now to emphasize the
benefits of film, and cheap disposable cameras against digital. ;-)
All this is, of course, dependent on the one major weaknesses of
digital _not_ being solved.
I've long thought thi
texture of light
and of the world. The B&W draws out the beautiful texture of the leaves
and of the building. I hope you don't mind if I drag a copy to my
desktop pictures folder. :-)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
, the raison d'être for
that white line running down to the pond would be missing for me,
making me wonder what it was there for, and distracting.
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ldn't decide which I liked better, so thought I would post and see
which one would get the votes. Now I can play with a couple, and see
what comes out. :-) BTW, #9 wasn't supposed to be there. I didn't see
it until the page was rendered, so decided to leave it--the lazy bum
that I
r? Did I try to get too much? too little?
Part of what happened was that visibility wasn't very great, so it was
difficult to compose, but that's no excuse. :-)
Fire away!
oh, the url:
<http://homepage.mac.com/jonglass/rynek/index.html>
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/s, so are silencing themselves until the
next wave comes out, because they don't have enough stock to meet
potential demand?
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
photography today is to shoot loong lenses (300mm) to reduce the sizes
of facial features like noses, etc. Maybe you could try shooting with a
long lens. I suppose it will take a large area, but who knows???
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
to get too much? too little?
Part of what happened was that visibility wasn't very great, so it was
difficult to compose, but that's no excuse. :-)
Fire away!
oh, the url:
<http://homepage.mac.com/jonglass/rynek/index.html>
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Dec 9, 2004, at 5:07 PM, Jon Glass wrote:
We visited Prague a couple years ago, and I was very disappointed with
it. It's too perfect looking! I felt like I was in Epcott! Warsaw is
just as bad, no, worse... They were forced to rebuild their "old town"
after WWII, and it lo
On Dec 9, 2004, at 1:44 PM, Frantisek wrote:
No, really, it's exactly that. The stall had a glass window/door which
was held up during the hours it was open.
Aha! And that's _you_ in the lower right-hand corner!
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
felt like I was in Epcott! Warsaw is
just as bad, no, worse... They were forced to rebuild their "old town"
after WWII, and it looks really fake. :-) Now, Krakow, on the other
hand, just oozes of age. I'll have to post some images I have
somewhere. They aren't much, but I'
is a consumable. software is a long-term "investment." There are
tons of differences, and almost no similarities between the two...
We need that photo of the oraple. :-)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
f our neighbors won't put up their
trees until Wigilia (Christmas Eve) and will probably keep them up
until February. :-)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Dec 8, 2004, at 11:36 PM, Jon Glass wrote:
I thought a purist drank "his" coffee black. (A purist also uses the
proper non-gender specific pronoun in English as well).
Actually, that was the joke... but as I understand English, a purist
would stick to the historical understand
tanding of the English language,
and not allow his language to be "trendy" either...
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Dec 8, 2004, at 4:04 AM, frank theriault wrote:
2) Who, on this list, is a purist - come to think of it, what's a
purist?
A purist is a person who drinks their coffee with only cream and sugar.
;-D
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
.
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
enses work also? This is so weird, that I just have to hear more...
:-)
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Dec 7, 2004, at 8:03 AM, Juan Buhler wrote:
the black tape special
edition soviet * ist D:
But why the black tape?
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
weeks (BTW,
Hello!) and I can tell you that this comment is almost sure to generate
a lot of traffic! :-D
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
x27;t tell...
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
