On Thursday 24 February 2005 07:58, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Very nice. I looked at every pic. Your work has improved tremendously
since you first started showing us concert pics.
Paul
Thanks.
The one thing that really bugs me is the red oversaturation (and it took
someone else to give me the
An arseload of PESOs is up on my livejournal:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/ouij/
yeah, it's more of the same lo-fi concert work. I love it. You all are
probably sick of it. What can I say--some people take pictures of their
cats. Others take pictures of flowers. I take concert
On Monday 14 February 2005 02:49, Jens Bladt wrote:
Not pretty. It looks cheap and toyish.
It also makes it look non-professional, which I believe, is the whole idea.
Some people hate the idea of being confused with a pro.
I once waated to buy a Metz hammer head flash for work - like the ones
I go out to a lot of rock shows and take pictures. (plug: the most recent
stuff is always at http://www.livejournal.com/users/ouij/). It's a lot of
fun, and people have been very positive about my work thus far.
Tonight, I went to a show and decided not to bring the camera.
It was nice to
On Sunday 30 January 2005 01:43, Jamie Walling wrote:
I think you are write that someone blindly reading his
page will end up with a camera that Ken likes, however
as much as I like the istDs I think more users will be
happier with the D70 than the istDs. Not
necessisarily becasue of quality
On Saturday 29 January 2005 23:30, Mark Cassino wrote:
I have one *ist-D.
I'm not sure what the point of this survey is. I doubt that many people
who own an ist-D would sell it off and buy and *ist-Ds. Given the
different memory cards, I doubt many people would choose the DS as a backup
to
One *istDS.
-Luigi
On Thursday 20 January 2005 13:31, Peter J. Alling wrote:
Depends of you look at the Major Media maps or the Governments own
official Map.
http://www.nationalatlas.gov/natlas/natlasstart.asp
The official map shows the results of the 2000 Presidential election, not the
2004!
On Thursday 20 January 2005 14:54, Tim Sherburne wrote:
For some reason, this strikes me as hellishly awkward. I'm familiar with
the Green Button on my MZ-S, and it's nothing like this with M series
lenses.
Do any of you D or DS owners find this workflow to be so troubling that it
interferes
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 11:34, Dave wrote:
This may have been covered, but can anyone describe how functional this
camera is with a manual K mount lens? I know the *istD has some sort of
button, green I think that was enhanced via firmware for this.
Surf on over to my livejournal to see
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 19:12, Don Sanderson wrote:
The ist-D is going to live in infamy forever for it's
battery glitches, now ain't it? ;-)
Certainly more prone to them than my MX
-L
On Sunday 16 January 2005 15:53, mike wilson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I recently spent an enjoyable
afternoon translating between Cockneys and Geordies.
what's a Geordie ... ?
(other than a blind man on Star Trek TNG)
ERNR
A person
On Saturday 15 January 2005 05:44, Cotty wrote:
On 15/1/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Try this:
Magdalen College.
Or even Magdalene College. Pronounced the same, but spelled differently.
Ahh, but is it?
In Oxford, it's Mawdlin !
in Cambridge, it's maudlin, and
On Friday 14 January 2005 10:21, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi ...
While it's a nicely framed shot and well executed, the subject is s
overdone. I suppose every photographer should have such a pic in his or
her portfolio, if only to suggest something of a sense of humor.
This shot brings
On Friday 14 January 2005 11:43, frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 01:36:18 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We might even say it was Dam stupid...
I once heard that electronic equipment doesn't work very well on Hoover
Dam...
I'd believe it. Hoover Dam must
On Friday 14 January 2005 10:24, frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:56:25 -0500, Luigi de Guzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think the name of the dog was Nipper or something like that, and they
were still using the dogs in TV ads even into the late '90s.
So no, you're
On Friday 14 January 2005 10:24, frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:56:25 -0500, Luigi de Guzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think the name of the dog was Nipper or something like that, and they
were still using the dogs in TV ads even into the late '90s.
So no, you're
On Friday 14 January 2005 11:43, frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 01:36:18 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We might even say it was Dam stupid...
I once heard that electronic equipment doesn't work very well on Hoover
Dam...
I'd believe it. Hoover Dam must
On Friday 14 January 2005 10:21, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi ...
While it's a nicely framed shot and well executed, the subject is s
overdone. I suppose every photographer should have such a pic in his or
her portfolio, if only to suggest something of a sense of humor.
This shot brings
On Friday 14 January 2005 12:16, Graywolf wrote:
GOOD!
Then I will refrain from posting my views of bicycles without brakes,
gears, or freewheels; and the people who drive them (in traffic).
Trackies?
It's pretty stupid (and in most states, illegal) to ride without a front brake
in traffic,
On Friday 14 January 2005 12:43, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
This puts your first pic in an entirely different light, so to speak. It
seems that the SUV is not parked in a space reserved for compacts. The
compact only space is behind the space in which the SUV is parked. And
looking at the
On Friday 14 January 2005 12:55, frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:24:29 -0500, Luigi de Guzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Trackies?
It's pretty stupid (and in most states, illegal) to ride without a front
brake in traffic, even if you do ride a fixie
Well then, you're sure
On Friday 14 January 2005 11:35, frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:17:19 -0500, Luigi de Guzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 11:12, Graywolf wrote:
VAT?
Again, unless the Iron Chancellor has made Canon DSLRs VAT-exempt, this
wouldn't make
On Friday 14 January 2005 12:40, Graywolf wrote:
Anybody here aware that all SUV's are not large.
My Blazer is under 15 feet in length and 5 feet in width and fits in
compact car spaces with no overhang. Furthermore the term SUV (Sport
Utility Vehicle), originally applied to S-10 Blazers and
On Thursday 13 January 2005 19:00, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Reminds me of the mascot for RCA Victor. Boy I'll bet that dates a few of
us!
His master's voice.
I think the name of the dog was Nipper or something like that, and they were
still using the dogs in TV ads even into the late '90s.
So
On Thursday 13 January 2005 19:17, Mark Roberts wrote:
To paraphrase Monty Python: Film's not dead, but it was coughing up
blood last night (The Dead Vicar on the Landing sketch IIRC)
It's a fair cop, but society is to blame.
HI'd like to conclude this arrest...with a hymn...
-Luigi
http://www.livejournal.com/users/ouij
It's at the top. Lucky I decided to bring my camera when I went out this
morning!
-Luigi
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 05:44, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Herb Chong wrote:
given that the US list price for the *istDs and the 300D are almost the
same and the street price is nearly so, what's up with the UK
distributor?
You hit it on the head Herb. Pentax is
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 10:36, Peter J. Alling wrote:
Taxes and Greed.
I don't see taxes as a valid reason--unless there are some shady deals,
Canon would have to pay the same taxes, unless for some reason there's an
anti-Pentax tax (er, perhaps a PenTax?) in force.
When I lived in
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 11:12, Graywolf wrote:
VAT?
Again, unless the Iron Chancellor has made Canon DSLRs VAT-exempt, this
wouldn't make a difference. Something else is going on.
-Luigi
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 18:45, frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:47:51 -0500 (EST), wendy beard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you Frank. Brightened up my day vbg
Knowing that I brightened yours, brightens mine.
Title made me smile too
I don't know why, but I always
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 12:17, Chan Yong Wei wrote:
Have you tried FreeCiv?
I use only Linux and Mac OS X... have weaned myself off any need to
use the Windows operating system.
I'm still fumbling about with freeciv. as far as I know, recent versions
don't have the civ3 ruleset, which I
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 18:18, Nick Clark wrote:
My local dedicated Camera shop says the *istDs isn't selling. They have it
and the 300d and D70 (and the Minolta which is humungous) on display
alongside each other. Even though the Pentax is smaller, they say the
reasons people don't go for
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 19:05, Tim Sherburne wrote:
An additional nugget in Apple's cornucopia of announcements is a
significant update to iPhoto including new editing tools (it's about time),
and video and RAW support. Unfortunately, Pentax isn't in the list of
supported cameras, yet. :(
On Sunday 09 January 2005 11:50, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Too much information here, Cowfish Billy ;-)) Some of us just want to see
the photos, not play with new technology - RSS, livejournal, consolidation
of feeds, interlinking websites - from what I can see and understand, none
of that adds
On Sunday 09 January 2005 11:50, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Too much information here, Cowfish Billy ;-)) Some of us just want to see
the photos, not play with new technology - RSS, livejournal, consolidation
of feeds, interlinking websites - from what I can see and understand, none
of that adds
On Sunday 09 January 2005 13:05, Mark Roberts wrote:
Actually, I always thought the C***n/N***n thing was sort of a J-O-K-E.
You know, those things that require a sense of H***r?
Hexar? HaX0r?
Inquiring minds want to know!
-Luigi
On Saturday 08 January 2005 15:46, Graywolf wrote:
Very true, and not all positives are equal either.
If you think of it 95% of transactions should be rated as neutral. Nothing
great, but nothing bad about them either. As it is all they mean at the
best is Positive=they didn't rip me off, and
On Saturday 08 January 2005 23:32, John Celio wrote:
Without USM and IS like technology, I am afraid nothing Pentax could do
to impress
high end 135 users.
I hate to say it, but I agree. Pentax needs something to really set it
apart from the other guys. Consistantly making
On Sunday 09 January 2005 02:12, frank theriault wrote:
BTW, I agree with your comments WRT the difficulty in shooting bands.
Lighting mostly sucks, and sometimes one simply can't use a flash (or
doesn't want to).
Lighting's a funny thing. In situations like this, I almost don't mind the
On Sunday 09 January 2005 23:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luigi de Guzman mused:
verdict: If I wasn't already so heavily invested in Canon glass, I'd
get this. (heavily invested, here means that the total value of his
lenses is easily in excess of the value of his car. Admittedly, he
On Sunday 09 January 2005 01:09, John Celio wrote:
Canon, David, C-A-N-O-N ... why is it that so many people are hesitant to
use the names of other camera manufacturers here? There's no such
reluctance to use the names of other lenses.
CANON NIKON KONICA MINOLTA (See, we're all still
On Sunday 09 January 2005 01:22, frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:30:24 -0500, Luigi de Guzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/ouij
Finally got around to posting some more concert pics onto the LJ.
Comments always welcome.
Yeah, I know--I'm
I'm a dolt. direct links to pictures, a few of 'em:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v293/Brunellus/Sandbox%20Kings%2028%20Dec%2004/Molly.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v293/Brunellus/Sandbox%20Kings%2028%20Dec%2004/Mariachi03.jpg
On Sunday 09 January 2005 01:30, frank theriault wrote:
Okay, now that I've gone and look at the photos, they're mostly okay -
maybe even pretty good. I think there are too many of them. You
could probably lose about 1/2 to 2/3 of them, and it would have much
more impact. For instance, the
On Sunday 09 January 2005 01:44, frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:24:19 -0500, Luigi de Guzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I hope you fixed yourself a good sandwich, at least :)
Nah, I did go get a drink though.
Sorry about being snippy. I'm still pissed
http://www.livejournal.com/users/ouij
Finally got around to posting some more concert pics onto the LJ.
Comments always welcome.
Yeah, I know--I'm getting a bit monotonous, subjectwise. I gotta get me some
different subjects
-Luigi
On Friday 07 January 2005 22:43, Brian Dipert wrote:
I had a chat with the folks at the Pentax booth today at CES. What I was
told is that there are less than 1000 bodies left in factory inventory, and
when they're gone there'll be no more made; the *istDS will carry the torch
going forward
On Thursday 06 January 2005 02:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ya know I am beginning to think that just maybe I am supposed to
become a photographerAll 3 of these are all very nice cameras and
with all this equipment, well, I am beginning to feel a tad blessed
here
Somebody up there
On Thursday 06 January 2005 03:23, Cotty wrote:
On 5/1/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
What, only ~one~ bottle of Vodka? Between three of you? Geez, pretty
tame for a PDML rendezvous...
Actually I have a confession to make. That bottle contained sparkling
mineral water...
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 02:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Playing, I put the 135 MM Olympus lens from my Ricoh on just to see
what it would be like and I was impressed with it more on the Pentax.
I seemed to be able to get a sharpper focus, but then again I have no
clue as to what I am
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 11:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup. It pops right on, no problem at all. It is a Olympus E-Zuiko
Auto-T 1:3.5 lens to be specific. I'm told this is a 135MM lens? The
specs on these are different than on my digital and I am not used to
them as yet. It's got the
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 02:59, Jon Glass wrote:
On Jan 3, 2005, at 11:16 PM, Luigi de Guzman wrote:
A valid question, since, as I recall, CDs play from the centre
outwards.
Of course, it's only valid if you've never played a record before I
need to ask my kids what they would do
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 00:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm Morrighan aka Phantom Queen.
I am a complete newbie to film camera usage and I thought I'd check
you folks out because I just lucked out and bought an Asahi Pentax
Spotmatic at Goodwill for like $20 and after doing some research I
On Monday 03 January 2005 15:23, Jens Bladt wrote:
A friend of mine has a young daughter, who wanted to try her dads old
grammophone/record palyer.
After having put the record on the turntable she wanted to place the pick
up on the record and asked: Where does it start, in the centre or at
On Sunday 02 January 2005 12:27, JP M wrote:
Hi Bob,
Yes, I already have the K to M42 adapter on the K1000.
I've been using some Kodak Retina IIIs lenses with a
Deckel to M42 adapter stacked on the K to M42...
I need a pointer to a good one. Meaning an M39 that
has the proper (weird)
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 14:34, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The question I have is unrelated to shooting a lot of frames. It would be
nice to know why the DSLR shooters on this list feel a need to *tell
everyone* how many hundreds or thousands of frames they've shot. Most
respond to that
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 14:34, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The question I have is unrelated to shooting a lot of frames. It would be
nice to know why the DSLR shooters on this list feel a need to *tell
everyone* how many hundreds or thousands of frames they've shot. Most
respond to that
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 15:05, D. Glenn Arthur Jr. wrote:
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 13:36:10 -0500, Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Here in the mountains it is well off people who want a nice
place with a view who build their million dollar house on a
ridge. Ruining the view for
On Monday 27 December 2004 22:24, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Some questions for those who've got the istDS: How do you like it thus
far?
4 weeks and 1,200-plus exposures later, I love it.
I don't understand all this big hands uncomfortable with small equipment
ballyhoo. The DS is about
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 11:36, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Thanks for your comments, Luigi ...
I just don't understand why so many digi users love to mention how many
hundreds or thousands of exposures they've made. Most are probably
worthless pap made just to see what happens Reminds me of
On Thursday 23 December 2004 20:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, seeing as there's so many
quizes and
questionnaires about, here's one:
if you shoot a digital camera, do you have the rear LCD set so that it
displays the freshly taken image right
On Friday 24 December 2004 06:46, David Weiss wrote:
Hi,
Anyone here know much about how to install a
Gimp Plug-In? I went to their official site,
picked the download option for the redeye
plug-in, and I get a text version of the
program. Does the same thing for other
plug-ins.
Dave
On Friday 24 December 2004 18:53, David Weiss wrote:
Luigi,
Just using plan old Windows 2000.
Hmm, if you have the time, can you explain what
gcc is? Does this advice still apply if I am
using Windows?
gcc is a C compiler for Linux. The advice does not apply if you're running
the
On Wednesday 22 December 2004 07:17, Steve Jolly wrote:
Billy Abbott wrote:
that was the cheapest i found and Jessops price matched it for me.
although after buying a memory card and some gubbins it was back up to
£799 again
What's the kit lens like?
S
I took a whole series of test
On Thursday 23 December 2004 02:56, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I was talking with a friend earlier and the conversation got around to
modern cameras as he's thinking about getting a digi for his daughter.
There wasn't much i could help him with since I know so little about modern
cameras, and apart
On Wednesday 22 December 2004 20:46, Fred Widall wrote:
Anyone else finding the same thing ???
I've ripped through 1,200 images in two weeks, so there. :-P
Seriously though. My only justification is that most of those have come in
'action' situations under very difficult light. The digital
On Monday 20 December 2004 18:40, frank theriault wrote:
I was at a party, and there were some people break-dancing. I went
into the hallway, and found these two practicing, with some observers:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2973964
Comments welcome.
Hell of a party you were
Twelve hundred some exposures on, the *ist DS remains more fun than a barrel
of monkeys. I've just posted another big set of concert pictures on my
livejournal:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/ouij
Having taken the *istDS to a couple of smoky shows lately, I notice that the
camera has begun
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 17:29, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 21 Dec 2004 at 20:43, Jan van Wijk wrote:
Pentax must be serious about getting this one to the market!
Even our generally slack local distributor had a largeish ad in a
very high
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 14:48, Cotty wrote:
On 21/12/04, Jan van Wijk, discombobulated, unleashed:
Pentax must be serious about getting this one to the market!
It's on the shelves alright but precious few know it's there.
Here, here.
The Pentax *ist D and DS are, so far as I can see,
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 18:48, mike wilson wrote:
Luigi de Guzman wrote:
I got mine with the DA 18-55 lenskit for US$999. By the time taxes had
happened, it was $1,066.
That makes it just under £600. I like this $2 to the £ game. Can you
play it any better?
mike
When I
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 18:15, mike wilson wrote:
. As with most imperial
measurements and their applications it was designed by engineers based
on practical experience, not the mutterings of a committee based on the
wavelength of a particular colour of light.
mike
so that would
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 23:51, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Luigi de Guzman
Subject: Re: Pentax lens screw sizes, help please
Even living as I do in the USA, I'll take metric over imperial
measures any
day. Perhaps someday even this country will go
On Wednesday 22 December 2004 00:22, Peter J. Alling wrote:
Those definitions of imperial measure haven't been used in about 500
years. The founders more or less
Americanized them anyway. They are way ahead of the metric system
anyway, haven't you noticed that
they're binary. (Whereas the
On Monday 20 December 2004 09:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Billy Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Also, any advice on a free image manipulation program for Windows
would be great - my trial period for PSP ran out the day I got the DS
and I need something to tide me over until the new year,
So I'm taking pictures at a show, and the *istDS locks up.
Out of nowhere, it sets itself in bulb mode, won't let me trip the shutter,
won't let me do anything.
Turn the camera off, turn it on, it pops the flash, the back displays VERSION
1.0 and goes black, and same story.
Annoyed now,
On Sunday 19 December 2004 05:28, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 18 Dec 2004 at 19:54, Luigi de Guzman wrote:
Buying a microsoft operating system is just a bunch of cash I'd rather
save for a 35/2 lens.
An OEM licence is generally provided with machines at a cost far less than
that of a 35/2 lens
On Sunday 19 December 2004 07:55, Larry Cook wrote:
Luigi,
I have had similar episodes with my *istD. I have had it go into bulb
mode; the shutter has locked, etc. Putting fresh batteries in solved the
problem each time. I guess, that is just the kind of behavior you get
when you have
On Saturday 18 December 2004 12:11, Jerry in Houston wrote:
carries around a bucketful of leeches,
Leeches are making a medical comeback seems they
can be pretty useful afterall.
As I recall, the best medical use for leeches these days is in the
post-operative phase of surgery to
So the *istDS's shakedown cruise continues. Went down to my local bar to get
some pictures of Welbilt (great indie-altrock band here in Northern
Virginia-- look out for 'em: http://www.welbiltmusic.com) at their regular
Wednesday show.
The results are on my livejournal:
On Saturday 18 December 2004 15:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice shot. Good composition and framing. However, this is one of those
times where I think color would serve very well. Paul
I bought the digital so that I could do color again. Color film, processing,
and whatnot is pretty
On Saturday 18 December 2004 16:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice work. Fun pics. I enjoyed this.
Paul
Thanks. It was a fun show!
-Luigi
On Saturday 18 December 2004 18:47, Rob Studdert wrote:
Nice portrait of an obviously lovely lady. The noise is pretty horrible at
ISO 3200 but in reality it's still better than you could ever achieve on
film at the same ISOs and then not even in colour.
H'mmm... really? But then, I don't
On Saturday 18 December 2004 19:25, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 18 Dec 2004 at 18:01, Luigi de Guzman wrote:
As with the hardware, so with the software: I use the GIMP and Linux
because they're powerful and efficient for most of what I need to do,
and--this is the best part--they're FREE
On Saturday 18 December 2004 19:12, Joseph Tainter wrote:
I have gotten my wife an Optio S40. This thing is tiny. I was expecting
something the size of a 35 mm. point-and-shoot. She'll be able to leave
this in her purse and have it everywhere.
...which means she won't pull it out. ever!
On Thursday 16 December 2004 08:38, Don Sanderson wrote:
I didn't see your original post but for film it's hard
to go wrong with an Olympus Stylus Epic.
Tiny, light and has a top quality, razor sharp lens.
Also comes in zoom models but the lenses aren't as good,
or as fast.
Don
Gotta
On Friday 17 December 2004 00:05, Mark Erickson wrote:
I ran across this Erwin Puts review of a Leica lens and was struck by its
artfully-crafted prose
Erwin Puts is probably the biggest Leicaphile on the planet. His reviews are
generally good reads, but he sometimes gets carried away by his
On Thursday 16 December 2004 18:58, Jens Bladt wrote:
Dear fellow PDML'ers. I don't believe this is new. Olympus had two DSLRs
with live LCD for years! Olympus E-20. Also the E-10, I believe. They don't
have exchangeable lenses, but nevertheless, they are still DSLRs vwith a
live LCD.
All the
-35mm f/2 FAL
-135mm f/1.8 A*. Also a 135mm f/3.5M, for when I don't want to carry
something that's friggin' huge.
-50mm f/1.4 A
-20mm f/4 M
-Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6
-A real darkroom space (so I can keep it real, even if I have a *ist DS)
-Luigi
I need a camera to my eye
To my eye
Remind me
I have a late-model vivitar 283 (S/N 0829xx). From what I read on usenet, the
trigger voltage for this may be high...
Can I use this on a *istDS or do I risk frying the camera?
replies urgently requested, as I've got to decide whether or not to pack it
for tonight's shoot
-Luigi
---
I
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 15:59, Mat Maessen wrote:
If it's a truly late model 283, the trigger voltage should be plenty
low enough for any camera out there.
It's hard to describe the differences between the early and late
versions of the 283, but the case will look a bit more plasticy on
On Tuesday 14 December 2004 15:28, wendy beard wrote:
Pros for the *istDs:
Small size
Good build
Nice looks
For a minute there, I thought you were talking about the girlfriend, and not
the equipment
snip
Pros for the DRebel:
Availability
Price
I'd say the Pentax wins, wouldn't
On Tuesday 14 December 2004 00:23, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling
Subject: Re: Girlfriend going Canon, help!
Isn't your undying love and affection enough?
Access to Juan's lenses should certainly be enough.
However, if the bottom line is the bottom
It was a bright, clear, and cool morning, so I took the new *istDS for a walk.
It was clear, bright, and cold this morning--so I decided to take the new
camera with me for a quick walk through town. The whole story, properly
formatted and whatnot, is on my livejournal:
are available if you're
interested and know how to get in touch.
Oh. And nearly all of these images were taken with my old 50mm f/1.4 XR
Rikenon.
thanks.
-Luigi de Guzman
www.livejournal.com/users/ouij
On Monday 13 December 2004 16:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome to the live list. I enjoyed your photos. The chess set was my
favorite. Nice light, nice bokey. Hope we see more of your work. Keep
posting! Paul
Thanks.
The Rikenon is actually a pretty neat lens--it's bokeh is something
97 matches
Mail list logo
