mz-60qd doesnt sound like digital. qd stands for quartz databack.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 11:04:19PM -0400, gfen wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, Brett Mckay wrote:
> > Does anyone know any info about this new Pentax that is about to released?
> > I take it to be Pentax's first digital SLR, based a
just a personal experience note: Adorama's ratings are not as
conservative as KEH's. Ofcourse there is always a return for refund
option :)
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:56:29PM -0400, Paul F. Stregevsky wrote:
> $365 in EX--a very nice deal.
>
> Also a 30/2.8K for $285--not the best price, but if
this one looks like a t-mount adapter to me.
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 06:35:59PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
> Sorry for the eBay post, but this one is a bit strange. It
> appears to be a PK body to M42 lens adaptor that will cause the
> lens to lose infinity focus.
> Any thoughts?
> http://cgi.eba
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:29:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1351000890
>
> Now somebody tell me why this happens.
> We just talked about a A*85/1.4 that went for over $1,100.
> This one sold the same day for $438 !
>
> All because the s
a good place for info on ricoh 35mm slrs is:
http://www.butkus.org/chinon/
forum is:
http://www.ricoh-cameras.co.uk/forum/
check mike butkus's site. If 2 ricoh camera's look similar they very
likely have same way of operating. So if you cant find a manual, simply
look for a similar looking mode
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 06:13:33PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'll reply in all caps, point by point:
>
> Nitin Garg wrote:
>
> Built in winder on xr-m (+ for me, - for paul. he prefers to attach winder
> if needed).
>
> YEP. YOU CAN THUS SEE THE WIND
The 2 that I have experience with are xr-p and xr-m. Paul has used xr-p
too and has given it favourable review here. He found it to have a less
vibration compared to his Super A (wrong model?). Our comparitive points
about the 2 are:
+ Bright viewfinder and 0.88x mag for xr-p (.80 for M)
. Built
Or get the undervalued ricoh bodies and get both :)
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 11:25:19AM -0700, Ron Bhanukitsiri wrote:
> Hi Shel,
>
> The Pentax MX is totally manual, no aperture priority. The
> exposure is always locked, but it may not be what you want ;-).
>
> I've always wondered which is th
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 06:24:03PM +0200, Jostein wrote:
>
> Searches in Google and Yahoo! turns up references from a spanish
> newsgroup, but I can't read a word of Spanish... :-(
Didnt the language translation tool help to get a rough idea ?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Tried that already :) The batteries were dead but it didnt help.
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 10:09:53PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Nitin Garg
> Subject: me-f mirror locked up.
>
>
> > hi,
> >
> > Is there a simple reaso
hi,
Is there a simple reason why the mirror of ME-F would be locked up, the
shutter button would depress freely, and film advance lever is jammed ?
Or does that imply a trip to the repair center ?
thanks,
nitin
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://ww
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 02:43:51PM -0600, Joseph Tainter wrote:
> Shutterbug describes the ZX-L as a 5n replacement. Peterson's reviews it
> in their current issue and calls it a ZX-7 replacement. Huh?
>
> Of course, it comes only with program metering. No center-weighted or
> spot.
This has be
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:45:23PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
> > UPS close at 4.30 PM EST and just after lunch Pacific time
> (Bloody Unions
> > again) no wonder things are SNAFU in Canada.
>
> Send it back, get a refund, then report him to the FBI. Shipping
> something internationally under fal
Extras from a package I bought.
MX - has dent on top of prism housing, near battery cover (so battery
cover doesnt come off as easily as they normally do but still does come
off :)), some brassing on lower portion of lens mount and at usual
edges. works fine. KEH bargain.
MX Winder: Broken batte
The best way to merge digital and film is to make *digital film* IMO.
Dont know if its possible. Dont think anyone is doing it :)
I dont think is going to happen but a
On Thu, May 02, 1996 at 07:01:40PM -0700, Jeremy Clegg wrote:
> I have been away, so I apologize if this topic has been beat t
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 03:35:35PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The eyepiece blind is a nice touch: It's an internal blind, or
> shutter, that completely blocks off the light for autoexposed timed
> shots. Unlike aftermarket blinds like HAMA's, this one allows you to
> use an eyepiece acce
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:34:47AM -0400, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Comment found on the Leica list:
>
> > But the Hasselblad, like the Leica,
> > uses its glass to give a transcendent glow,
> > a luminous quality that is not to be
> > found in other cameras meant for mere mortals.
>
> Is The Bro
> From: Brendan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thu, 2 May 2002 10:45:48 -0400 (EDT)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re: 120 film - developing tanks and reels
>
>
> Trust me there is nothing better than having life
> development support with Aaron walking you thru.
>
Very funny slip there
As mentioned on the list before: metal.
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 10:46:24PM -0700, Ron Bhanukitsiri wrote:
> Does anyone know if the new ZX-L uses a plastic lens mount or metal
> lens mount?
>
> Thanks,
> Ron B[ee]
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to
Email the winner and find out :)
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 11:44:01PM -0400, TM wrote:
> Yeah, I didn't bid too high because it's a screwmount. I wonder
> if a PDMLer got the lens?
>
> Taka
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EM
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 10:13:56PM -0400, TM wrote:
> I can't find any screwmount info- if this lens optically is like
> the K300/4, then it sounds like a good lens, esp. for $140, no?
140 is extrapolated price from keh's price. no gurantee you will find it
for that on ebay. with patientce you sh
About ~$140 on ebay. $225 on keh. (for super-takumar 300/4)
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:53:07PM -0400, TM wrote:
> How much is one of these things worth?
>
> You don't see many of these available, so it's hard to value.
>
> Then again, do I really need a 300mm lens? Hmmm.
>
> Taka
> -
> This
http://home.att.net/~alnem/html/3rdpartyprime.html
i got the vivitar 19/3.8 recently too. Will use it soon:)
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 04:14:20PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Unfortunately, I can't speak to the 24mm as the widest I currently have is a 28mm.
>
> I am awaiting delivery of a
#90110. PENTAX 6X7 SINGLE LENS REFLEX CAMERA 145pp, fully illustrated.
Reprint of the original factory repair manual; includes exploded views,
parts list, full service information. Also includes information on
normal lens. $25.00
from http://www.craigcamera.com/newrep.htm
maybe you could try
There is an equivalent of wget for windows systems. You basically drop
the URL http://pug.komkon.org/02may/ (for this months thing) into it.
Ask it to fetch everything from it recursively but not to span domains
or ascend directory structure (so it wont goto
http://pug.komkon.org/anyonther_link_no
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 10:30:35PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
>
> >
> > ok, yet another (dumb) question: which is the base side ?
>
> The side that doesn't have the emulsion on it. If you are
> looking at the slide, and the image is the right way around, you
> are looking at the base.
>
cool!
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 09:58:48PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
> >
> > If by mistake one gets a fingerprint on a slide (havent done
> that yet
> > but i do it to prints all the time) is there any better way to
> "clean"
> > it than wiping with a soft microfiber cloth ?
>
> I haven't found one yet.
I am sure you have a fix for world's hunger and peace problem too ;)
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 06:23:08PM -0700, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
> Nitin wrote:
>
> > An offending water droplet landed right on my slide today (thankfully
> > only a shot of architecture here so can take it again someti
Another slide question :)
If by mistake one gets a fingerprint on a slide (havent done that yet
but i do it to prints all the time) is there any better way to "clean"
it than wiping with a soft microfiber cloth ?
thanks,
nitin
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 09:22:47PM -0400, Christian Skofteland wrote
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 06:50:40PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
> >
> > An offending water droplet landed right on my slide today
> (thankfully
> > only a shot of architecture here so can take it again
> sometime). How do
> > I get rid of the spot it formed there ?
>
> It is there forever. Nothing
Hi,
An offending water droplet landed right on my slide today (thankfully
only a shot of architecture here so can take it again sometime). How do
I get rid of the spot it formed there ?
I also noticed the slide mounting eats away into a portion of the
shot all around. Is this standard or are the
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 08:29:22PM -0700, Timothy Sherburne wrote:
> I've been watching the By-It-Now auctions carefully over the past month (but
> apparently not carefully enough!) and I've concluded that eBay only updates
> their search indexes every 60 to 180 minutes, depending on the load. Des
i see :) So i take it to mean its a good deal.
thanks for the inputs.
cheers,
nitin
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 09:03:49PM -0400, Christian Skofteland wrote:
> That's what I was thinking
>
> Christian
>
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 08:18:30PM -0400, I wrote:
> > > > Probably a good dea
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 08:18:30PM -0400, Christian Skofteland wrote:
> Probably a good deal, but it's going to need a CLA. They all need CLAs.
well, I can return it instead :)
>
> ;-)
>
> Christian
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Nitin Garg&
http://www.pgoodrick.fsnet.co.uk/lkdsl.htm
found by chance when testing network connection.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I got the same email too. It certainly wanst local settings that did
anything to it -- i get mail on a unix server that never has to bother
with such things :). The deletion must have happened at the list server
end.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:42:28AM -0400, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> Well guys I go
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 09:34:46AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Last week I received the color prints from the first roll of film for
> which I used an XR Rikenon P 50/2. This is the giveaway lens that
> comes with so many Ricoh and Sears bodies sold on EBay and elsewhere.
At last count, I
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 10:11:59PM -0400, Mishka wrote:
> Whatever you "hide" into your image, unless it is showing on the print, it
> can be removed simply by re-JPEG-ing it.
Digital watermarking is more involved then that. Simple re-JPEG-ing
(like the sound of it :)) wont work without degrading
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:28:28AM +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
>
> One interesting exclusion in the current crop of digital cameras is that even
> though they write all manner of information into the file at the time of
> capture none provide an option for the camera owner/authors name to be emb
if the dof is not important, one can also use a filter to slow down the
shutter further if one doesn not have issues about using a filter :)
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 09:54:29AM -0400, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> What's that? Could you not use a slower film?
>
> Mishka wrote:
>
> > a "b
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1349304300
I remember someone here looking for 50/1.2 and that the last one went
for much more than this. I dont need or particularly want this one.
Whoever wants it can take it :) (err... not free ofcourse).
Is there any place where pdml-ers ha
S76, LR44,.. the list of compatible battery is long :)
Just take the one you took to store and ask for an equivalent one.
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 06:53:17PM +1000, John Coyle wrote:
> Picked an ESII in not bad condition today, for A$55 including an SMC
> 50/1,4 and a Vivitar 2x converter, a c
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 06:54:10PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Nitin Garg
> Subject: Re: I WON!!! at Ebay
>
>
> > That doesnt work for me atleast as i work from different comps
> at
> > different times.
>
> Goshers, you
http://pages.ebay.com/help/buyerguide/search.html
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 09:43:04PM -0400, Mishka wrote:
> Does anyone has pointers to the complete syntaxis of Ebay search engine
> queries?
>
> I have been able to find by trial and error that
>
> (pentax, smc, pentex) 85mm -(takumar,zoom,scre
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 12:43:28PM -0400, Mark Cassino wrote:
> At 10:56 AM 4/27/2002 -0400, jeff wrote:
> >How good is this lens?
>
> I found it to be good, with the only major weakness being flare when the
> sun directly hits the front element. Otherwise it is sharp and contrasty.
>
> I had o
That doesnt work for me atleast as i work from different comps at
different times.
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 10:35:16AM +, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Why not just bookmark auctions you're interested in?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> > I've got one of those "marker" bids on the A100/2.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:09:55PM -0400, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Another thing that happens is that often a number of people, some with
> absolutely no intention of buying the item, place "marker" bids so that
> they can more easily track the auction. This, too, drives the price up.
>
I do tha
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 01:02:12AM -0400, Fred wrote:
>
> Just one point more: I wonder just how many (few?) times there have
> been where someone has spotted something "interesting" on eBay -
> something so "interesting" that he/she wanted to bid on it
> him/herself - that he/she ~still~ blabbe
hi,
I have an almost new barely used 500 FTZ flash. I was hoping to use it
with whichever pentax af body i get after my zx-5n died. But i am pretty
happy with my current manual bodies and dont see getting a af body for
quite sometime. I dont use flash much anyways.
So, its up for sale. B&H lists
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1348991267
ugly but nice ? :)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1348986203
Its $58 including shipping BIN price. Seems pretty good to me. NMA.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gall
The takumar bayonet lenses were cheap consumer grade k-mount lenses.
not worth $100 at all. There are better performing lenses available for
less.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 05:45:18PM -0400, J. Gerace wrote:
> hcan you explain why?
>
> Nitin Garg wrote:
>
> >If its
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Mishka wrote:
> How painful is it?
Not at all if you dont try to change between m42 and k mount lenses.
> Does that mean stop-down metering?
Yes.
> I have heard that these are not "lens adapters", but "body adapters",
> whatever that menas.
Never he
http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?MemberSearchShow
fill in the contact info request form and ebay will email you the
address and contact info they have on file. Hopefully it will still be
valid. If its invalid then increase your level of worry about the
transaction and act accordingly :)
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 09:39:31AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Nitin,
> The XR-P and its successor, the XR-M, use the same matte. But the XR-P
> offers a larger magnification (0.88X vs., I think, 0.80) and the
> aperture window. That, and the option of manual film advance, is why I
> prefer
n't use its language tools. I
> know the picture shows a Nikon mount, but then I got the impression the
> picture on the listing wasn't a picture of the actual lens. It looks a
> little too polished to be the work of the average seller on ebay.
>
> On Wednesday 17 A
For quick rough translations use babelfish.altavista.com (google has
translate.google.com iirr).
Also, the pic shown in the auction is that of a nikon mount lens.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:42:47PM -0500, Ken Archer wrote:
> I saw this today with about 25 minutes to go didn't have time to get
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 07:58:29AM +0100, John Leonard wrote:
> SMC-A is manual focus, auto aperture.
> SMC-FA is auto focus, auto aperture
> but so (it seems) is SMC-F
>
> So what _IS_ SMC-F lens as distinct from SMC-FA?
SMC-F is not auto-aperture.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
> The two questions I have are:
>
> 1. Which 35mm camera body should I get (Pentax of course). An old manual
> focus classic or a new, auto focus gem? If so why and if not why not?
> Would you recommend other brands (sacrilege)?
I would say ricoh body :) Pretty good and cheap.
-
This message
If non-pentax k-mount bodies are allowed, the ricoh's xr-s (has solar cells)
could be 1 option for a sunny island where battery availability is an
issue and one really wants TTL metering and other assorted power
requiring goodies.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 02:14:55PM -0400, Bill Owens wrote:
> Wow,
hi,
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 09:52:57PM +0100, Bob Walkden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On the Contax RX you have a PF option which lets you choose whether to
> rewind fully into the cassette, or leave the leader out. I used to
> make it rewind fully, but that caused problems when I wanted to
> mid-roll rewi
I finished my first roll of film in my xr-m. It was a pleasant surprise
to find out when opening the back to take the film out that the leader
was still out! The manual makes no mention of film leader out on rewind
but if this is a assumed feature its pretty neat(and i hope the midroll
rewind does
Being price sensitive, I have actually got most of my equipment at low
prices. My latest buy (a smc k 135-600mm) seems like a very good buy
too. I paid $550. Keh's online quote thingie says they will pay $766
for it :) Looks like I will be able to recover my money and finance some
more stuff if I
just wondering: What all lens mount types have adapters available to
mount them on pentax k bodies. The adapter should be without an optical
element preferably. M42 lens is 1. What other mounts ?
thanks,
nitin
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:51:34AM -0400, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christian Skofteland
> > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:44 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Whats your most used Camer
Used flashes are fine and cost less too. $90 for the af-280t sounds
expensive to me however. It could be reasonable tho. I dont have it so
dont know :)
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:28:26AM -0400, TM wrote:
> Considering that a AF-280T costs about $150 new, is it worthwhile
> to buy a used one in e
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:52:05PM +1000, Paul Jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My most used body at the moment is not actualy a Pentax.
Then what is it ? :) I currently use ricoh xr-m and xr-10m.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow th
Whats wrong with /. ? I have never been to the site. Just asking.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:26:58PM -0400, David Brooks wrote:
> Amy did great work,but my initial impressions
> of /. are 'control/alt delete'
>
> Dave
>
> Begin Original Message
>
> From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTE
This link might help:
http://www.photographyreview.com/pscFilm/Slide,Film/Fuji,MS,100-1000/PRD_83345_3118crx.aspx
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 08:18:17PM -0400, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> JUST BOUGHT 5 120 ROLLS OF FUJI 100/1000
> SLIDE FILM. ( 99 CENTS A ROLL!)
>
> Anyone ever used this stuff? Appar
red to see the film. I
> also said that it was marketed as "based on a true story" (I can
> remember the radio/tv commercials). I never made claims that the film
> actually had that phrase in the trailer/credits.
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>
>
> Original Message:
&g
as was the pen giving tradition.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:47:37AM -0400, Mick Maguire wrote:
> I heard that the Nobel speech was also a work of fiction too, that he wasn't
> allowed to speak at all.
>
> Regards,
> /\/\ick...
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubsc
When i saw the move "A Beautiful Mind" the credits said inspired from
the events in the life of john nash. It didnt say based on true story.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:04:54AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Isn't that the same way that the recent academy award winning "A
> Beautiful Mind" won
http://www.mail-archive.com/pentax-discuss@pdml.net/msg66732.html
Ann Sanfedele i know has done this before. But thats an old post. You
might be talking of some other recent post.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:08:26AM +0200, Rogier van der Peijl wrote:
> Someone mentioned he was selling pictures o
I read somewhere (dont remember where) that 7 element converters are
much better than 4 element ones (or was it the other way round ? :))
I guess thats not much of a help :D
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:45:14AM -0400, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> Did Pentax make a high performance
> K mount 2X teleco
In the auto mode, the lens diaphragm stays open so the meter needle
wont move. And the K-mount cams have no mechanism to push the pin of SM
lens which causes the lens to stop down. So one has to always use them
in manual setting (ie stop down metering). This actually allowed me to
buy cheaply lens
I was using mostly SM lenses till a while back tho not on a k1000 but
first a vivitar 4000s and then a ricoh xr-10. The results were always
well exposed so it never occured to me that something was amiss (and i
didnt have k-mount lenses to compare with anyways).
I will try sometime tomorrow to ch
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1344692919
anyone have any experience with the above lens ? The "3rd party cult
classics" page seems to indicate this is T-mount and thats about it.
What about its performance ?
thanks,
nitin
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
I got both links fine :) unless the pics i got to see werent what they
were supposed to be...
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:49:39PM -0400, Peifer, William [OCDUS] wrote:
> Len wrote:
> > Gee, Bill, what did you do to those pictures? They aren't there any more.
> > ;-)
>
>
> Bill Gates ate them,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:06:46AM -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
>
> > Japan and most of east asia (china, phillipines etc) are still not on
> > the best of terms. What is history and what is recent past are very
> > subjective. Its great that many animosities went by in a couple of
> > generations -
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:06:46AM -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
> More idiocy!
bah.
> > >
> > > Nor does it make her responsible.
> >
> > It does when the same colonial rule continues in the same way during her
> > time as well.
>
> You do not understand responsibility. To be responsible for anyth
purely from a "how it should be" perspective, i wouldnt worry about
religiously keeping the batteries charged. But i would periodly recharge
them so i dont find it dead when i need it.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:20:51PM -0800, RK wrote:
> Recently purchased a spare set of rechargeable Lithium's
s
> that the wars of the tribes would cease.
> But when we disarmed they sold us,
> and delivered us, bound, to our foe.
> And the gods of the copybook headings said,
> 'Stick to the devil you know.' "
> --Rudyard Kipling
>
> From: "Nitin Garg" <[EMAIL PR
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:35:06PM +0800, Simon King wrote:
> Hi All,
> I plan to make some comments on my new MZ-6 soon, but first of all a
> question.
> The remote cable release for the MZ-6/ZX-L is "Cable Switch CS-205" which
> has a different plug to the cable switch F.
> It's looks just like
And there was nothing arrogant about the original message. Nor do I
think its mindless to (politely) add on a mailing list that not everyone
shares the sentiment.
ok, ok, no more on this :)
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:33:10PM -0700, James Adams wrote:
> I don't know what was arrogant about the o
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:59:50PM -0500, Treena Harp wrote:
> Dude, you are SO wrong -- film sucks! Digital is the wave of the future, man
> ... :)
that it is. But i think "the future" is too far off for now.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chris Brogden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
And yes, i dont know anything about your country, about her personal
life or her family. That doenst change what happened to some colonial
regions and the opinion of some people there. Similarly, you know
nothing about my country and what people there went through. If you
think stating that not ev
Of course she made significant impact. Just that it was negative for some.
My memorial, impact or remembrance is irrelevant. A single insignificant
person never counts but a collection does. I am as small a fart (or
maybe even smaller) than you are but lots of small farts together can be
awfully s
>
> On Tuesday 09 April 2002 09:26 pm, Nitin Garg wrote:
> > Right, she just continued to let the blood being sucked out of holes
> > made by her ancestors. Innocent little girl.
> --
> Kenneth Archer, San Antonio, Texas
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -
> This message is f
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:04:39PM -0400, Robert Woerner wrote:
> I'd rather be ruled by the British Monarchy than by those who believe as you
> seem to. Give it a rest already. Sheesh! :-)
And what is it that i seem to believe ?
>
> Britain and the Allies saved the world from the likes of H
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:14:35PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Nitin Garg wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:39:59PM -0700, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
> > > Nitin wrote:
> > >
>
> >
> > Doesnt always work. Did the US govt say that to s
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:23:44PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Much of the United States was once part of the British Empire, ditto
> Australia and Canada. I don't think any of us feel that our years as
> subjects of the crown deprived us in any way.
Do red indians (native americans as they a
e Queen Mum did not. Go back to school
> boy. And take a cold shower.
> Paul
>
> Nitin Garg wrote:
> >
> > Right and churchill (and many before him) was just the PM and the first
> > colonizers were just businessmen and explorers, the british personnel in
> >
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:47:22PM -0400, TM wrote:
> Frank,
> Thanks for the advice.
>
> I'll look into another Spotmatic body, maybe a II so I have the
> hotshoe.
>
> I'm really, really slow w/ changing screwmount lenses- paranoid about
> cross-threading and it seems really slow. Bayonet mount
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:39:59PM -0700, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
> Nitin wrote:
>
> > Right, and Churchill ... ... riches of the
> > colonies spontaneously moved to england on its own.
>
> C'mon. Let's please not get into dredging up accusations
> regarding things of the past
ng. And she was a heroic and
> charming lady.
> Paul
>
> Nitin Garg wrote:
> >
> > The whole world might not agree. She was the colonial ruler of a lot of
> > places which werent thrilled with the british rule :)
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:05
Unless there is some feature you think the zx-m lacks and you really
need, i would say go for lenses. Find out what focal length lenses you
need (read on web. lots of info), and read up on those lenses (or ask
the folks here who have experience with them).
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 06:46:49PM -040
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:12:21PM -0700, James Adams wrote:
> She didn't have a lot of choice in the matter, yes she married a Prince who
> was next in line to be King. Prior to King Edward's abdication, she had
> probably given little or no thought to becoming Queen Consort, or to taking
> on an
In the off chance that anyone here is interested, I have some nikon
stuff to offload. Not to pollute this list further, ask me directly if
interested for details :)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forg
The whole world might not agree. She was the colonial ruler of a lot of
places which werent thrilled with the british rule :)
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:05:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Queen Mum,
>
> << May she rest in peace. >>
>
> There goes one of the true "heroes" of the 20th Cen
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nitin Garg
> > Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 11:53 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: 135-600mm lens on 3011BN+3030 head setup
> >
> >
> > Do you have a recommendation on a good monopod to use it with ? As it is
> &g
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
