But you are a collector. To take photos you only need one camera. The fact
you have several proves you are a collector. Malcom's friend probably drives
those trucks too, now and then.
Frankly, I don't know why so many photographers refuse to accept they are
collectors, maybe not serious ones, or
Ah, but, you see. He thinks you take pictures. Tell him you collect
cameras. He will understand. Mind you he will still think you are dippy (who
the hell wants to collect cameras, or Barbie dolls, for that matter), but he
will understand. He's a collector himself.
Ciao,
graywolf
[EMAIL PROTE
And, it will show in as little as 500 years. BTW, do you guys who have
the screw mount 50/1.4 where your dosimeter when using it?
Ciao,
graywolf
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:39 PM
Subject: Shift in lens ton
No, it is a viewfinder camera. Rangefinder cameras by definition have an
optical rangefinder. That means all those AF p&s cameras are not RF cameras
at all. Calling them RF cameras is about the same as calling them SLR.
camera, misleading to say the least.
Ciao,
graywolf
- Original Message
If anyone has a print in the mail, and I have not confirmed receiving it,
please let me know. If I don't hear otherwise I will consider all the prints
postmarked by 15 Dec. to have come in by 30 Dec. And, will announce the 2001
winners on 31 Dec.
Ciao,
graywolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is
You have a floking great holiday too. And the same to the rest of you.
Me? I'll be glad when it is over, and I can grow my beard back. My christmas
hero is the Grintch. That's the only way I get xmas presents, steal them. HO
HO HO!
Ciao,
graywolf
- Original Message -
From: William Ro
of 2 or 3 of the 4 tank models
> with photo ink cartridges.
> Kent Gittings
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Rittenhouse
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re
You be sending a 2400ppi 1x1.5 inch image to the printer. You need to change
to a 400ppi 6x9 inch image before printing. That is you want to keep the
file size the same but the image size larger. That is usually called
resizing. If you change the file size it is usually called resampling. Best
qua
Someone asked a simular question a short while ago. I didn't see an answer,
so I will comment.
Here in the Charlotte, NC, USA area ME Supers seem to go for $125-150US in
the local camera stores. A M50/1.4 goes for cera $75. Together there is
usually a $25 or so discount. I have no idea what the V
Naw, as you very well know, its about getting kids to smile happily when
they are in a strange place, with a bunch of strange people, and a lot of
strange stuff all of it pointed at them. If you can do that you can get a
good photo with anything that will expose film.
Ciao,
graywolf
- Ori
I think you are slightly mistaken in your figures (I am being polite). The
current of four batteries in series is the same as one battery, but the
voltage is 4 times as high. For batteries in parallel have 4x the current
but the voltage stays the same as one battery.
However, the question of whet
M35mm/f2.0
Ciao,
graywolf
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:17 AM
Subject: Favorite Lens Roll Call Results UPDATE 42
> These are the conditions:
> 1 - You must answer off-list exclusively. On-list votes will no
Darn automatic smell checker it changed MX to something else.
Ciao,
graywolf
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:18 AM
Subject: Favorite Film Roll Call Results UPDATE 34
> These are the conditions:
> 1 - You must
While it is too late to qualify for one of the nifty 2001 prizes, I would
like to see your print. It will be helpful in compiling a larger database of
printer performance, and maybe we will manage to come up with prizes for
2002. I asked the Pentax rep who provided the current ones for an MZ-D for
There are a lot of factors that have changed since the fifties. Film and
paper of course as you have mentioned. Optics, lenses are very much crisper
now. Lighting, in the fifties it was mostly hot lights and flash bulbs
though a few were using big strobes which even so give a far different look
to
Strangely, no one has sent me a print from an 800 series Epson for the PDML
Printer Challenge, but I have several from 1200 series printers that use the
same technology. They are all very nearly photographic quality. From seeing
them I don't think you can go wrong buying a 890
Ciao,
graywolf
-
http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcgvintl.html shows gun death statistics
for many countries. It is interesting to note that Japan, Australia, New
Zealand, & Canada have very high suicide rates despite restrictive laws
about gun ownership. BTW it looks like 95+% of the hits for "gun deaths" are
Yah, and the lens was too long to get a good shot or the cliff dwelling as I
went by. Sometimes you can't win for losing.
Ciao,
graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Night Photo of Earth
> Aren't you the same guy that mounted his big tele len
Why don't you give "dad's" old meter a try first? If it works at all it is
probable pretty accurate. If it isn't then you can think about replacing it.
If you do, I suggest spending a little bit more than you are thinking of and
getting something a little more versatile. The Sekonic L-308 b (or b
There is actually a screw that holds the frame in place under the foam
mirror bumper. Lots-o-luck finding that SE screen, if you find a source for
them let me know, I would like a couple myself
Ciao,
graywolf
- Original Message -
From: LeviL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n with the
> Schneider, there's no doubt about it.
>
> Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
> >
> > To check sharpness an 8-10x loupe is ok. Since you are not using the
full
> > field of the loupe a cheaper one usually is ok.
> >
> > To look at the image something like a goo
I tried to take one like that once, but couldn't get my tripod to go high
enough .
Ciao,
graywolf
- Original Message -
From: John Mustarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:24 AM
Subject: Night Photo of Earth
> Here's one of those "I wis
uh? Bill? Is Gatonia that primative? That is not to say your homebrew is not
good, but nothing you can buy is as good? You know I live just next door in
Charlotte? I can buy some of the worlds best beer here. There is a place
nearby where I can even get them on draft. I'll have to buy you a beer
s
ind out what i was doing on the weekend ? :)
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tom Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:52 AM
> Subject: Re: Pentax Ads
>
>
> > Sure we do! A
geous (Equal to the very best glossy ilfochrome custom prints).
Ciao,
graywolf
PDML Challenge c/o
Tom Rittenhouse
4018 Hiddenbrook Dr
Charlotte, NC 28205
USA
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forge
r 15, 2001 to be considered for
the 2001 prizes. So send your print ASAP via snail mail to:
to:
PDML Challenge c/o
Tom Rittenhouse
4018 Hiddenbrook Dr
Charlotte, NC 28205
USA
1. All rights to the photo remain the photographers.
2. It will not be published with out specific permission of the
photogr
Not a direct responce to you, ED, but a question that always comes up in my
mind when people start asking about second bodies. On this list and amongst
a most of the hobbiests I know, they always want a different body than the
one they have. Myself and most pros I have known, on the other hand, wa
I remember sending out a resume printed with a Xerox daisywheel printer. I
got a 35% written response from it. That was shortly after lasers had taken
over the market. I think the recipients thought they were hand typed. Other
than with the daisywheel printer I never have gotten much more than a 3
If the Contax does indeed use a CMOS sensor, then it is not up to the
quality level of the CCD in the MZ-D. The only camera currently on the
market that competes with the MZ-D is, as I have said here before, the $7K
Kodak DCS-760, and it has a slightly less then full frame sensor.
My guess is tha
Pentax certainly isn't going to go for the news photographer market. Nikon
and Conon compeate in that market by providing free on-site service and feee
loaners at major events. That is expensive, and the comsumer gets to pay for
it when they buy Canon, or Nikon consumer grade cameras; so I would't
Sure we do! All Aussys are brainless idiots who pick up poisonous snake, let
crocs chew on their leg, tease water buffalo, etc when they are not driving
their Subaru at excessive speed through the desert while drinking oil can,
after oil can, of Fosters.
.
Ciao,
graywolf
- Original Message
I would guess the mirror bumper foam is rotted away. Should be a fairly
cheap fix at a local camera repair shop. The light seal foam in the back
should probably be replaced at the same time as it is probably in the same
condition.
Ciao,
graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Trish Johnson
; to donate a prize for the best print of all.
>
> You are the first to hear about the grand prize as I haven't gotten a
chance
> to post it to the list yet. (Major computer crash).
> - Original Message -
> From: Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
I should think focussing the sun or moon would be easy since they are at
infinity. Exposure for the moon is usually about the same as bright
daylight, that after all is what is illuminating it, f11 @ 1/film-speed
should give good exposure with negative film. Solar photography is a rather
specializ
Hi guys.
I have received prints from a couple of list members that were not their
pictures. They in my opinion were about what you would get if you pressed the
button on that printer down at the computer store. Really nice, but could you
or I get that, not having a $100/hr PhotoShop expert to twe
Actually, in the old days <=mid-sixties' WA weren't exactly great
performers. When you multiplied their faults x 2 + added the faults of
the teleconverter you got rather soft pictures. But like a lot of the
photographic rules we seem to be slaves to it doesn't much apply to
today's equipment. Also
Yep! Rule one for business, any business, if you are cheap you get cheap
customers.
For years I tried to be a photographer that people could afford. No
matter how cheap I priced myself, my customers said I was too expensive
and were never satisfied with my work.
Then I came into one of those Po
Still trying to recover from a bad virus. . I think I've finally
gotten this computer almost setup back the way it was.
I did receive the prints, they rate an F, but? I am still thinking about
that but.
--graywolf
Mike Johnston wrote:
>
> By the way, where did Tom Rittenhous
Yep. That's the critter that got me. Then when I got every thing
reloaded and set up the way I wanted it got me again. So I reloaded
again and this time tried to bullet proof it. Then the damn computer
wouldn't shutdown properly. So, this time I formatted the HD and loaded
everything from scratch
I alway felt safest driving an eighteen wheeler. Except for idiots in
passenger cars who seemed to think a 80,000-100,000 pound truck could stop
on a dime that is.
Ciao,
--graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Mike Johnston
My memory may be wrong, but I thought there was a clear screen with
crosshair available for the MX.
Ciao,
--graywolf
- Original Message -
From: LeviL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
There is
> no Pentax made clear screen for MX, which
Most folk are leary ot being photographed when they are knowingly breaking
the law.
Ciao,
--graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Mike Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 7:47
I will second Aaron's opinion on the Sekonic L208b. Mine has been stone
reliable since I bought it used several years ago. Also it seems to be the
most pocketable ambiant/flash meter around. Don't think that doesn't matter,
a meter in your pocket is far more useful than one in the car a half mile
Well, I just compared the 2001 photoguide to the 1956 photoguide. I have
both right here. The 2001 is about 1/4 inch taller and slightly thicker, the
cover on the old one looks to be a lot more durable. I seem to remember that
back in the fifties they cost a buck (you could buy a paperback novel f
Listen to Paul. Going by his prints he knows what he is doing with an
inkjet.
That said, I wouldn't screw around with it too much. As I recall you just
bought that printer. Make them replace it. Life is too short to be fixing
manufacture's quality control problems.
Ciao,
--graywolf
-
In a word, cost. Check out the price on those backs. I believe the Phillips
CCD is the first affordable 24x36 CCD, but even with it cameras would be in
the $7K range. Like all electronics, big CCDs are getting cheaper and we
will, no doubt, see some reasonably priced full frame sensors "real soon
Yah, sure, blame me.
--graywolf
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
> > >
> > > Dave, any bookstore should be able to get it for you. I go
Well, I always figured it was because they didn't want pictures taken of
that blacked out limo. Certainly no one was going to get a shot of anyone in
the car. But, maybe they just didn't want anyone to follow them to where
they were going. If that was it, they succeeded brilliantly. All the furor
Well, there is a prototype that they have shown. It was about as top end as
you could get. For whatever reason, and there have been many metioned on
this list, they have put it aside. The current skinny is they will have a
lower spec one out by the middle of 2002. But so far all we have seen is
va
flash stuff
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Rittenhouse"
> Subject: Re: flash stuff
>
>
> > Well, I know all about guide numbers, but what happens if the
> battery in my
> > calculator goes dead?
>
> Really, Tom, you don't carry a slid
Well, I know all about guide numbers, but what happens if the battery in my
calculator goes dead?
--graywolf
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 6:35 PM
1 7:11 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: shooting holiday lights
> Tom.Can you get this book from Kodak,or would most
> bigger camera stores supply them.
>
> Dave
> Begin Original Message
> From: "Tom Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Fri, 30 Nov 2001
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: shooting holiday lights
> Not with a 1-degree spot meter.
>
> Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
> >
> > Actually metering is something of a bug-a-boo under these types of
> > situations.
> --
> She
I got to see and handle the new Optio 430 today. Wow, is that thing tiny.
Supposed to be the smallest 4mp digital camera, I believe it. It makes me
rethink P&S digitals. This thing is so small you could carry it around and
never notice it, then when a photo opportunity appears, whip it out and
sho
In line comments
--graywolf
- Original Message -
From: William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: Computer Upgrade
> - Original Message -
> From:
Paal, go ahead and post about cars. If anyone wants to talk to you about
them they will. If not I assume you are adult enough to not continue posting
a dead subject. If it turns out that only one or two of you are interested,
then common courtesy would suggest you take it off list.
The thing abou
No, it just means someone is putting forth their own agenda. They don't even
recognize the real pros. You know what some pros still make house calls,
unlike doctors.
About the lens. No it is not any good. Unless you kept it frozen it is
probably spoiled after 2 years.
TV, what are you drinking?
That is why, except for a tie breaker, I am using the objective criteria of
the halftoning. So far I have been able to seen it with a 4X Fuji loupe on
all of the prints I have received. By doing it that way it is more of a
hardware rating than a operator rating. There is of course no way to
comple
I could sure use the +1, Joe. Be glad to pay shipping or even a few bucks
for it. I suppose someone has beaten me to it though.
--graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Joe Wilensky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:02 AM
Subject: Diopter correc
The problem with that Mike, is that those kind of responses very quickly
turn any list into hell.
A few years back I was running my own newsserver. When there were a lot of
complaints about off topic posts, I checked. There were about ten times as
many posts complaining about off topic posts then
The one that got me was, I think, a script embedded in an e-mail. When I
selected the e-mail to delete it, it ran. It gave me a "script cannot
complete" message. Norton did not detect it.
--graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
I think my computer crash last night might have been due to a virus. Norton
is no help. The system was getting a little flaky so I ran Norton Antivirus.
It said the MBR had been changed so I selected ""Replace MBR" and continued
to run Norton. It showed no other problems.
When it finished a "You
**
So get those prints in the mail by 15 December 2001. The best quality print,
in my opinion, will win.
PDML Challenge c/o
Tom Rittenhouse
4018 Hiddenbrook Dr
Charlotte, NC 28205
USA
--graywolf
-
This message is from the
I had a major computer crash last night. My copies of the PDML Digital
Printer Challenge info are lost.
If anyone has a copy of the last post (PDML Digital Printer Challenge
(REPOST)), I would appreciate it very much if they would send me a copy of
it. Hard to run a contest when the guy running i
man enjoys his drink.
- Original Message -
From: Rob Geraghty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:19 AM
Subject: RE: photo printers
> "Tom Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can only rate printe
tal Printing Challenge
> Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
>
> > With three submissions in I have to say that the new generation of
inkjet
> > printers is far better than I thought they would be. Also it is already
> > clear that operator skill is a big factor in print quality.
&g
I want to apologize to the list for my bad manners. My issue with Kent
should have been discussed privately and respectfully with him. It was
neither. I have no acceptable excuse for my behavior.
HOWEVER! The idea that the list should be censored because a few of us have
bad manners is still unac
ng upon them the title
of "PDML Master Digital Photographic Printer". A high honor indeed. Deadline
for 2001 will be December 15, so send your print ASAP.
Send your print via snail mail to:
PDML Challenge c/o
Tom Rittenhouse
4018 Hiddenbrook Dr
Charlotte, NC 28205
USA
1. All rights to
With three submissions in I have to say that the new generation of inkjet
printers is far better than I thought they would be. Also it is already
clear that operator skill is a big factor in print quality.
Printer ratings:
Epson Photo 1270. D+
Epson Photo EX.E
Canon S-800. E+
PRI
My flame was not about subject matter but about attitude. Obviously you can
not see the difference, but then again you censors want to cut in and run
everybody elses life. Probably because you don't have one of your own. I do
regret having put my respose to Kent on the list, because I had promised
Some people prefer burros, I like ponies, our Canadian and Alaskan members
might want to consider Malamutes.
I remember a guy I met up on the Appalachian Trail. He had packed about 1/2
his gear on his dog. Said dog decided to have a run, and came back without
his packs. Talk about an unhappy camp
That's a Grafmatic Magazine, Aaron. They are actually pretty reliable as
long as the sepiums don't get bent. Robert White in the UK was advertising a
plastic equivalent from Fuji. Came loaded but the ad said they were
reusable.
--graywolf
-
The opti
Aw, shucks! Thanks for all the hard work.
--graywolf
-
The optimist's cup is half full,
The pessimist's is half empty,
The wise man enjoys his drink.
- Original Message -
From: William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pentax Discuss <[EMAIL
Well I have read that 10K ppi will record the grain pattern.
--graywolf
-
The optimist's cup is half full,
The pessimist's is half empty,
The wise man enjoys his drink.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t;
> -----Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Rittenhouse
> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 8:45 PM
> To: Pentax Discussion Malling List; Bob Blakely
> Subject: Taxes (Re: Depreciation of assets)
>
>
> You are correct!
I think that maybe there were simply two production runs of MX. The first
with 4* serial numbers, the second with 9* serial numbers. Has anyone seen
an MX with a serial number starting with anything other than a 4 or a 9?
--graywolf
-
The optimist's
The focal length gets shorter. An internal focusing lens is sort of a
limited zoom lens.
--graywolf
-
The optimist's cup is half full,
The pessimist's is half empty,
The wise man enjoys his drink.
- Original Message -
From: Frank Wajer <[E
Wow, have I said how much I like people who tell other people what they can
talk about. I thought that I had...
--graywolf
-
The optimist's cup is half full,
The pessimist's is half empty,
The wise man enjoys his drink.
- Original Message
e wise man enjoys his drink.
- Original Message -
From: aimcompute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: Taxes (Re: Depreciation of assets)
> Time for a TEAPARTY!!!
>
> Tom C.
>
> ----- Original Message --
You are aware that at f16you could have set the camera for 7 feet and
everything from about 5' to 12' would have been acceptably in focus at 50mm?
Set for 10 feet everything from about 7' to about 25' would have been ok.
Set to 28mm and 10' there is problably nothing indoors that would need
refocu
Hey, guys, just wear a pair of thin gloves under those mittens. Keeps your
hands warmer, and your bare fingers off the metal of the camera when you are
shooting. Silk is nicest but, other thin gloves work too.
--graywolf
-
The optimist's cup is half
I used to have a Banana Republic Guides Vest, (the one they stopped selling
after some gun editor said in print that people were using it to conceal
their handguns. Don't you just love politically correct companies). Any way
I finally wore it out (must have been the handgun ). Now I have a nylon
s
If you are going to use llamas, you might as well go to 8x10. In fact, some
would say you need at least a 20x24 inch camera to justify investing in
llamas. Others say a 12x17 is adequate.
For a 4x5 all you need is a bicycle. How many here are aware that the famed
Speed Graphic was a derivative of
You are correct! I am curious, Bob, how did you figure this out?
It is the big secret we are not supposed to know.
I figured it out back in the sixties when I did something unthinkable. I
found out as best I could what the taxes were in this country; federal,
state, and local (I am sure I missed
Originally, apochromatic lens were intended for process work. Separate
negatives were exposed for the cyan, magenta, yellow, and black separations.
The all needed exactly the same reproduction ratio so could not be refocused
for the various separations.
For general photography there were (are) ve
As far as I can tell the only purpose of interpolation settings on a scanner
is advertising, I know of no one who is serious about scanning who uses
anything but the optical settings.
--graywolf
-
The optimist's cup is half full,
The pessimist's is
I would think the reletive value would depend on whether you have $30 in
your pocket to spend, or just $10.
--graywolf
-
The optimist's cup is half full,
The pessimist's is half empty,
The wise man enjoys his drink.
- Original Message -
Fr
Well, my digital camera is a Nikon Coolpix 100. I bought it new, so I hardly
think you have been into digital longer than I have. I think Shel has
mentioned he has a digital that he uses when he feels it is appropriate.
And, it would not surprise me to find out that Mafud has a digital camera.
The
- Original Message -
From: Frantisek Vlcek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: TTL multiflash with METZ
>- like the old time photographers with head under the
>largeformat focusing hood of their 5
Yep!
--graywolf
-
The optimist's cup is half full,
The pessimist's is half empty,
The wise man enjoys his drink.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 6:34 PM
Vaporware! Will be available! Will cost!
We will not see this until sensor that are no thicker than film become
available. The reason that digital backs are ouly available for cameras with
interchangable magazine is simply that they are the only ones that have
enough backspacing to allow the imag
My film figures, or my digital figures? Film was base on my actual costs, so
it must have been the digital.
--graywolf
-
The optimist's cup is half full,
The pessimist's is half empty,
The wise man enjoys his drink.
- Original Message -
Fr
How long does it take to upload one of those 485 megbyte files from that 4x5
digital back?
--graywolf
-
The optimist's cup is half full,
The pessimist's is half empty,
The wise man enjoys his drink.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTE
Hey Kent,
4x5 scanning backs were 100-150mb ten years ago, that translates to 50MP. I
know for a fact that at least one current 4x5 digital back gives 485mb
files. A 4x5 CCD back based on the same wafer that is used in the Phillips
chip in the prototype MZ-D would give an 80MP (240mb) image. Of c
Well John you could check out Postscript printers. Micrograpfx Picture
Publisher will generated halftone separations on them, but I don't know if
they would be much like traditional halftone separations as I don't have a
Postscript printer.
--graywolf
-
Canon BJC-620 Properties
--Graphics and Color
--Halftoning
--Smooth, patterned, solid.
Of course Canon does not know what they are talking about.
No 3 (nor 4, nor 6) ink printing device is capable of printing shades of
color. The only way to make it look like it does is by halfton
Well, your cost of supplies is far cheaper than mine. 25 Sheets 8.5x11 Photo
Glossy paper $20. Set of ink cartridges for Canon BJC-620 $35 (those are my
actual cost, rounded to the dollar). Cartridges last about one pack of paper
for photo quality prints (again my actuall results). 2 up 4x6 = 50
Funny, this ties into my digital printer challenge. Since even with my five
year old printer I get better results than you are something, as you
surmise, is wrong.
First check your printer setup properties. You should find a section for
Quality. Select the best quality paper selections they give.
This reminds me of a couple I met while my ex and I were living in a travel
trailer some years back. They were in the camp ground space next to me for
awhile.
Talking with them they said, they were there visiting with their grandkids
who lived in the near by town.
They said, they traveled around
The text below is my reply to a private e-mail from Mike making the same
claim:
-
Yes, Mike, your digital printer does use a halftone screen for anything
other than line graphics. It is built in. Newer on
101 - 200 of 563 matches
Mail list logo
