Re: [Podofo-users] Could someone tell me the encode type of HexString followed by Tj

On Tuesday, 12.04.2022 at 18:34 +0800 Alex wrote: > Hi, > >     When I opened a pdf file using podofobrowser.exe,if a pdfobject > has a stream object,podofobrowser.exe will show the content of the > stream as the following: > > > BT > /F2 10.56 Tf > 1 0 0 1 136.46 758.28 Tm > 0 g > 0 G >

Re: [Podofo-users] [RFC] pdfmm 0.9.20 released and offer to merge back to PoDoFo

On Friday, 08.04.2022 at 15:38 +0200 Dominik Seichter via Podofo-users wrote: > Hi Zyx, Hi Francesco, Hi Dominik, hi zyx, hi Francesco, > > I also wanted to continue this discussion. Sorry again for the long > delay. If you prefer, we could also have a phone/video chat > about these points (also

Re: [Podofo-users] Questions about Support Model Podofo A2308KMA3AM1EU

Hello Mr. Reuter, this mailing list is of libpodofo, a software programming library and associated software tools/examples for working with Portable Document Format files/data (therefore its name from the first two characters of each word written initial-capitalized) and has nothing to do with

Re: [Podofo-users] Releasing 0.9.7 ?

> On 29 October 2019 at 13:24 Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Hello, Hello Mattia, hello all, > I believe it's high time for a new PoDoFo release. > It has been slightly more than one year since the last one was done. > Alright, there are still a few CVEs and other bugs opened, but many > have been

[Podofo-users] Special revision 2000: Past, Present and future plans for PoDoFo

Hello all, I designate the special revision 2000 for documenting the past, present and future plans for PoDoFo. Please commit anything to svn until this has been discussed and a consensus reached. Please make proposals for inclusion right away (just answer this e-mail), I will be offline all the

Re: [Podofo-users] Bug when drawing text using truetype font with difference encoding loaded from pdf

Hello Michal, hello all, > On 15 October 2019 at 19:00 Michal Sudolsky wrote: > > Hi, > How it looks with this bug? I'm sorry I did only look cursorily at the issue (yet): I'm no expert for fonts in PDF and for this reason, but also because other bugs caused crashes, output data loss in the

Re: [Podofo-users] PoDoFo browser

Hello Pietro, hello all, > On 06 September 2019 at 19:33 Pietro Paolini > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I am following the instruction to compile the PoDoFo browser from the page: > > http://podofo.sourceforge.net/download.html > the PoDoFoBrowser hasn't been changed/maintained for the whole

Re: [Podofo-users] Podofo rendering

Hello zyx, hello all, > On 14 August 2019 at 08:59 zyx wrote: > > > On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 14:11 +0200, Matthew Brincke wrote: > > but Boost isn't searched for when configuring the podofo build (with > > cmake) because it wasn't added as even an optional depen

Re: [Podofo-users] Podofo rendering

etro. Best regards, Matthew > On 13/08/2019 11:27, Pietro Paolini wrote: > > Hi Matthew, > > > > Thanks a lot for your answer, I am not bothered at all and I am  more > > than happy to stay on trunk - I just intended to flag this up. > > I've also found that the examp

Re: [Podofo-users] Podofo rendering

Thanks, > P. Best regards, Matthew > > On 12/08/2019 23:36, Matthew Brincke wrote: > > Hello Pietro, hello all, > >> On 12 August 2019 at 23:24 Pietro Paolini > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I've

Re: [Podofo-users] Podofo rendering

Hello Pietro, hello all, > On 12 August 2019 at 23:24 Pietro Paolini > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I've stumbled upon this library only a few days ago and I noticed that > the downloadable version from > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/podofo/files/podofo/0.9.6/podofo-0.9.6.tar.gz/download >

Re: [Podofo-users] PdfPage::DeleteAnnotation does not delete the annotation object as it should (full mail)

Hello F.E., hello all, > On 03 April 2019 at 12:11 "F. E." wrote: > > Hello again, > I created two alternative patches for this issue, since the first one feels > rather ugly. With patch v2, I switched the PdfReference parameter to > call-by-value instead of call-by-reference. I'd like to

Re: [Podofo-users] [BRANCH] Moving source from root/src to root/src/podofo

Hello Francesco, hello all, > On 06 April 2019 at 00:42 Francesco Pretto wrote: > > > Also Matthew: any comment on the proposed re-layout of the source code? > before, I had dreamt of getting rid of the root/podofo/ directory, but that was because of the wrapper headers in there. Because the

Re: [Podofo-users] [BRANCH] Moving source from root/src to root/src/podofo

Hello zyx, hello Francesco, hello all, > On 06 April 2019 at 00:06 Matthew Brincke wrote: > > > Hello zyx, hello all, > > > On 05 April 2019 at 11:34 zyx wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 2019-04-05 at 10:30 +0200, Francesco Pretto wrote: > > > Ok.

Re: [Podofo-users] [BRANCH] Moving source from root/src to root/src/podofo

Hello zyx, hello all, > On 05 April 2019 at 11:34 zyx wrote: > > > On Fri, 2019-04-05 at 10:30 +0200, Francesco Pretto wrote: > > Ok. Now there are no other outstanding patches from my side and > > yesterday I merged a pending change from Michal Sudolsky. what about the post "[Podofo-users]

Re: [Podofo-users] Fwd: Better handling of xref entries shorter than 20 chars

Hello F.E., hello all, > On 11 March 2019 at 09:52 "F. E." wrote: > > > I think "\n\r" combination is unnecessary. > On principal I agree. But without the patch, Podofo loads PDFs > with '\n\r' just fine and I don't want to change that without need. > Furthermore, the standard states 'if the

Re: [Podofo-users] Issue with Encoding dictionary

Hello Christophe, hello all, > On 21 February 2019 at 22:03 BLANCHARD Christophe > wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > I’ve managed to fix my issue. Please find my proposed patch as attachment. thank you for the patch, Christophe. I've changed it slightly but it looked good before also, just

[Podofo-users] Test EncodingTest::testDifferencesEncoding() now properly fixed (was: Re: Bug when converting string to encoding with difference encoding)

Hello Michal, hello all, > On 29 November 2018 at 17:26 Michal Sudolsky wrote: > > Function PdfEncodingDifference::ContainsUnicodeValue already gets its > unicodeValue parameter as big endian but it then treats it like machine > endian and swaps bytes then compares this against unicodeValues

[Podofo-users] (Security) Issue #39: Opinions about attached patch for it?

Hello all, I'd like some opinions about the attached patch for solving issue #39 [1] in which I have opted against throwing an exception in order to avoid interrupting processing /Names arrays in PdfNamesTree::AddToDictionary(PdfObject*, PDFDictionary&) which would lose information. However, in

Re: [Podofo-users] [PATCH] EncryptTest: Fix buffer overflow in decrypted out buffer in TestEncrypt()

Hello Francesco, hello all, > On 25 December 2018 at 21:04 Francesco Pretto wrote: > > According to OpenSSL 1.1.0 documentation[1], "the decrypted data buffer out > passed > to the EVP_DecryptUpdate() should have sufficient room for (inl + > cipher_block_size) > bytes". In TestEncrypt(),

[Podofo-users] PdfVariant: m_eDataType explained & Unknown sentinel value added

Hi zyx, hello all, > On 24 January 2019 at 18:55 zyx wrote: > > > Hi, ... snip ... > > > @zyx: Are you still vetoing that change of Francesco's (making > > Unknown equal to 0xff in EPdfDataType)? > > My complain from the past was about the compiler warnings (as Francesco > pointed out

Re: [Podofo-users] [PATCH 1/5] PdfVariant: m_eDataType is really a EPdfDataType

Hi zyx, hello all, > On 24 January 2019 at 12:13 zyx wrote: > > > On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 20:09 +0100, Michal Sudolsky wrote: > > I am tempted to note that -1 is stored in 8-bit integer in exactly > > same way as 0xFF. > it seems to me (after reading the remainder of zyx' post) that I should

Re: [Podofo-users] [PATCH 1/5] PdfVariant: m_eDataType is really a EPdfDataType

Hi zyx, hello all, > On 23 January 2019 at 15:39 zyx wrote: > > > Hi, > > On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 13:35 +0100, Francesco Pretto wrote: > > > weird, neither my checkout has it, nor the trunk: > > > > I have ePdfDataType_Unknown = 0xff because I pushed for this change > > some time ago[1].

Re: [Podofo-users] [PATCH 1/5] is problematic (was: Re: [PATCH 2/5] PdfDictionary: Removed 5 unneeded lookups in AddKey and RemoveKey methods)

Hello Francesco, hello all, > On 22 January 2019 at 23:16 Francesco Pretto wrote: > > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 22:27, Matthew Brincke wrote: > > > > I retract my acceptance of [PATCH 1/5] because I've found some > > posts [1] to the mailing list which show

[Podofo-users] [PATCH 1/5] is problematic (was: Re: [PATCH 2/5] PdfDictionary: Removed 5 unneeded lookups in AddKey and RemoveKey methods)

Hello Francesco, hello all, > On 18 January 2019 at 15:05 Matthew Brincke wrote: > patch and the fix because I'd like to accept the first two > patches in this series today (commit them after testing with > different compilers on GNU/Linux). I retract my acceptance of [PATCH 1/5]

Re: [Podofo-users] [PATCH 2/5] PdfDictionary: Removed 5 unneeded lookups in AddKey and RemoveKey methods

Hello Francesco, hello all, > On 18 January 2019 at 09:29 Francesco Pretto wrote: > > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 01:14, Matthew Brincke wrote: > > > > Hello Francesco, hello all, > > > > > On 14 January 2019 at 23:08 Francesco Pretto wrote: &

Re: [Podofo-users] [PATCH 2/5] PdfDictionary: Removed 5 unneeded lookups in AddKey and RemoveKey methods

Hello Francesco, hello all, > On 14 January 2019 at 23:08 Francesco Pretto wrote: > > > From: Francesco Pretto > ---src/base/PdfDictionary.cpp | 17 - > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) the lines your patch removes each contain an explicit or implicit lookup,

Re: [Podofo-users] Help related to signing PDF document

Hi Susheela, hello all, > On 13 January 2019 at 19:08 Susheela S wrote: > > Hi, > I have tried to sign PDF document using latest version of PoDoFo > 0.9.6 and openssl has been used for reading the certificate. I > have attached the .cpp file which has the code. The PDF file gets > created, but

[Podofo-users] Recursion guard against issues 15 (CVE-2018-8002) & 25

Hello all, what do you think about Dominik Seichter's suggestion [1] to extract PdfRecursionGuard to its own file then to fix recursion issues in other places, namely CVE-2018-8002 [2] (I'm of the opinion that fixing a CVE should take some precedence over supporting everything that's, at least

Re: [Podofo-users] Patch to handle indirect ID in trailer

Hello Clayton, hello zyx, hello all, > On 30 October 2018 at 18:34 Clayton Wheeler wrote: > ... snip ... > the typo in that comment, but I rewrote it after a closer reading of section > 7.5.5 anyway; it implies the ID can be indirect when a PDF is unencrypted. > what the patch doesn't do is

Re: [Podofo-users] GetFilteredCopy throws exception with empty unencoded stream

Hello Michal, hello zyx, hello all, > On 29 October 2018 at 16:39 Michal Sudolsky wrote: > > > I just meant there are other places where I can call function with NULL > buffer and non-zero length to make crash for example "PdfImage::LoadFromData". IMHO all these places should be fixed

Re: [Podofo-users] Password protected document

Hello Christophe, hello all, > On 03 September 2018 at 17:49 BLANCHARD Christophe > wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm trying to read attached password-protected (password is 'password') am I the only one to have *not* received any attachment with that email, or has it been sent to the list with the

[Podofo-users] Untracked CVE issues now fixed (was: Re: CVE confusion, also in Debian (was: Re: Next PoDoFo Release 0.9.6))

i > On 14 June 2018 at 01:37 Matthew Brincke wrote: > > ... snip ... > For the new info, please see my addition below (bad news). > > On 12 June 2018 at 22:21 Matthew Brincke wrote: > > > > > > Hello Mattia, hello all, > > > On 12 June 2018 at 16:25 Ma

Re: [Podofo-users] 0.9.6 fails to link a test with -DPODOFO_HAVE_GCC_SYMBOL_VISIBILITY

-1 I don't think any more classes should be publicized, internals of PoDoFo should rather be protected from users who might be tempted to rely on them. Hello zyx, hello Mattia, hello all, > On 30 July 2018 at 11:03 zyx wrote: > > > On Sun, 2018-07-29 at 19:45 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > >

Re: [Podofo-users] Fwd: Re: CVE confusion, also in Debian (was: Re: Next PoDoFo Release 0.9.6)

fter a while. > Not to mention, I fear the CVEs are going to keep coming... > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Matthew Brincke wrote: > > > firstly I apologize (especially in case the delay in reaction > > > on my part is the reason PoDoFo 0.9.6 was released with CVEs > &g

Re: [Podofo-users] Windows build on Podofo 0.9.5

Hello Patrice, hello all, > On 13 July 2018 at 10:48 Patrice Guérin wrote: > > Hello, > > My name is Patrice and I'm new with Podofo. > I was able to build Podofo 0.9.5 on Linux Debian 7 without problem but it's > a little bit more complicated on Windows with Visual Studio 2013. >

[Podofo-users] Fwd: Re: CVE confusion, also in Debian (was: Re: Next PoDoFo Release 0.9.6)

rds, mabri -- Original Message ------ From: Matthew Brincke To: mat...@mapreri.org Date: 14 June 2018 at 01:37 CEST Subject: Re: [Podofo-users] CVE confusion, also in Debian (was: Re: Next PoDoFo Release 0.9.6) Hello Mattia, I'm full-quoting my previous email because it was rejected by the l

Re: [Podofo-users] Help needed for MinGw

[ corrections in quoted text ] Hello Gilles, hello all, > On 04 July 2018 at 08:00 Gilles Maire wrote: > > > Hello, > > I developped chordV on sourceforge > https://sourceforge.net/projects/chordV using libpodofo and Qt5 > > All is fine on Linux machine, and I try to install podofo on Mingw

Re: [Podofo-users] PdfPage DeleteAnnotation

Hello Cory, hello all, > On 14 June 2018 at 22:41 Cory Mickelson wrote: > > > Please accept this patch to fix PdfPage DeleteAnnotation. I've added a I have the following objections against accepting your new patch: 1. You have changed pItem from an address on the heap to a stack-allocated

[Podofo-users] CVE confusion, also in Debian (was: Re: Next PoDoFo Release 0.9.6)

Hello Dominik, hello all, > On 26 January 2018 at 23:35 Matthew Brincke wrote: > > > [ Left Dominik in To to help him follow this thread, fixed text typos ] > > Hello Dominik, hello all, > > > Dominik Seichter via Podofo-users has written on 26 January 20

Re: [Podofo-users] [PATCH 13/13] PdfDictionary: Added support for range iteration

Hello Francesco, hello all, > On 22 February 2018 at 12:21 Francesco Pretto wrote: > > > Also added a convenience GetSize() method > --- > src/base/PdfDictionary.cpp | 10 ++ > src/base/PdfDictionary.h | 16 +++- > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >

Re: [Podofo-users] image extract

Hello Joerg, hello all, > On 22 May 2018 at 12:56 Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:48:50PM +0200, M. Froese wrote: > > thank you joerg, so what might be wrong with my podofo build? the resulting > > image is included in the attachment. > > Windows

Re: [Podofo-users] PoDoFo PdfString::Write buffer overflow

Hello Mark, hello all, > On 02 May 2018 at 10:20 Mark Rogers wrote: > > > Hi > > That sounds good. > > > if( pEncrypt && m_buffer.GetSize() && IsValid() ) > > As IsValid() contains only a NULL check on the buffer in m_buffer, > > the size check

Re: [Podofo-users] Getting Segmentation fault when trying to access PdfVecObjects

Hello Georg, hello all, > On 10 May 2018 at 19:28 Georg Funk wrote: > > > Hi Joerg, > > thanks for this hint. > > I thought maybe I'm misusing PdfObject::Reference() and > PdfObject::GetReference() in my code This could explain the null > pointer. > that could also

Re: [Podofo-users] Getting Segmentation fault when trying to access PdfVecObjects

[typos fixed and code re-wrapped in quote] Hello Georg, hello all, > On 10 May 2018 at 16:14 Georg Funk wrote: > > > Dear developers, > > I'm getting a segmentation fault in the following code snippet when > resolving IsReference()): > > if

Re: [Podofo-users] PoDoFo PdfString::Write buffer overflow

Hello all, > On 01 May 2018 at 00:54 Matthew Brincke <ma...@mailbox.org> wrote: > > > Hello Mark, hello all, > > On 20 April 2018 at 00:09 Mark Rogers <mark.rog...@powermapper.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > > > > >

Re: [Podofo-users] PoDoFo PdfString::Write buffer overflow

Hello Mark, hello all, > On 20 April 2018 at 00:09 Mark Rogers wrote: > > > Hi > > > This code from PdfString::Write has a buffer overflow – it checks > buffer.GetSize() > 0 then sets nInputBufferLen=GetSize()-2 which is passed > to new[nInputBufferLen] and

Re: [Podofo-users] [PATCH 10/13] PdfVariant: Added SetString method

Hello Francesco, hello all, On 22 February 2018 at 12:21 Francesco Pretto wrote: > --- > src/base/PdfVariant.h | 25 + > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) the patch looks good except for the fact I had to massage the white-space to get it to apply as a patch (without fuzz),

Re: [Podofo-users] PDF CVE Security Research

Hello Mark, hello all, > On 19 April 2018 at 08:45 Mark Rogers wrote: > Hi > This will be of interest to anyone testing PoDoFo or reviewing submitted > patches. It’s an analysis of 122 PDF CVEs found across a number of PDF > products presented at the Blackhat

Re: [Podofo-users] [PATCH] PoFoFo: fix CVE-2018-5296 by reducing limit in s_nMaxObjects

Hello Mark, hello all, > On 15 April 2018 at 22:06 Mark Rogers wrote: > > > Hi > > > Here’s a simple patch for CVE-2018-5296 – it reduces the limit returned > by GetMaxObjectCount from std::numeric_limits::max() to 8,388,607 which > is the limit for for the

Re: [Podofo-users] CVE-2017-5855 and CVE-2017-6844

Hello Mark, hello all, > On 15 April 2018 at 18:32 Mark Rogers wrote: > > > Hi > > > I’ve been trying to write unit tests for CVE-2017-5855 and CVE-2017-6844, and > now think both are false positives due to a bug in Address Sanitizer > triggered > by large

Re: [Podofo-users] PoDoFo 0.9.6-rc1 ready for download

Hello Francesco, hello all, > On 08 April 2018 at 21:16 Francesco Pretto <cez...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 8 April 2018 at 21:06, Matthew Brincke <ma...@mailbox.org> wrote: > > > > Could you please consider the following: I don't think the project sho

Re: [Podofo-users] PoDoFo 0.9.6-rc1 ready for download

Hello Dominik, hello all, > On 08 April 2018 at 14:12 Dominik Seichter via Podofo-users > wrote: > > > Hi everybody, >   > The first release candidate for PoDoFo 0.9.6 can be downloaded from here: >

Re: [Podofo-users] Justify text

Hello Luis, hello all, > On 13 March 2018 at 00:49 Luis Otavio wrote: > > > Since PoDoFo seems to lack the ability to print multi line text into the > Justified format, and I am a newbie on PoDoFo > > Id like the help of you guys to get a few information > ...

Re: [Podofo-users] Patch for GetFromResources to load colorspace

Hello Christophe, hello all, > On 10 February 2018 at 21:44 BLANCHARD Christophe > wrote: > > > Hello all, > > This patch to make GetFromResources function supporting ColorSpace that can > be an array: > > PdfObject* PdfPage::GetFromResources( const PdfName &

Re: [Podofo-users] Failed to build podofo on Manjaro Linux

Hello, > On 09 March 2018 at 16:04 張修銘 wrote: > > > Hello, > I downloaded snapshot of podofo from SourceForge and tried > to build it on Manjaro Linux, but I encountered an error. Here > is part of the error message: > > [ 66%] Linking CXX executable podofocolor that

Re: [Podofo-users] watermark

Hello ChunHsia Tang, hello all, > On 21 February 2018 at 10:16 chunhsia_t...@mazak.co.jp wrote: > > hi, I'm sorry I'm replying only now, I just got your email from the mailing list (approved there: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 01:07:23 +) as there was an outage/reliability problem at

[Podofo-users] Resend: Re: Abolition of old-style casts, dynamic_cast intro request

Hello all, this is a resend because of a SourceForge.net mailing list outage when it was originally (re)sent (I received an error message for that in email yesterday, March 4, 09:21 CET). -- Original Message -- From: Matthew Brincke <ma...@mailbox.org> To: zyx <z.

[Podofo-users] Patch review/mailing list unreliability (was: Re: Abolition of old-style casts, dynamic_cast intro request)

Hello zyx, hello all, > On 01 March 2018 at 09:03 zyx <z...@gmx.us> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 22:54 +0100, Matthew Brincke wrote: > > I hope I hadn't promised to review more than one patch > > Hi, > well, I understood (and hoped) your statemen

[Podofo-users] Fwd: Re: [PATCH 05/13] PdfPagesTree::InsertPage: Fix "atIndex" is really a 0-based index

Hello zyx, hello Francesco, hello all, this is a resend of the email content (with main headers) below. I'm sorry that e-mail didn't reach (all of) you originally. Best regards, mabri -- Original Message -- From: Matthew Brincke <ma...@mailbox.org> To: Francesco Prett

Re: [Podofo-users] Accessing the images of one page?

Hello Dmitry, hello Olivier, hello all, > On 20 February 2018 at 19:50 Dmitry Salychev wrote: > > > Hi, Olivier. > > First of all, you've to know what kind of image you're going to access. They > usually can be stored in a PDF file two ways: XObject image or

Re: [Podofo-users] Abolition of old-style casts, dynamic_cast intro request

Hello Francesco, hello all, > On 27 February 2018 at 22:48 Francesco Pretto <cez...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 27 February 2018 at 22:22, Matthew Brincke <ma...@mailbox.org> wrote: > > I'd like > > to make its code more C++-like by removing those > > and

Re: [Podofo-users] [PATCH 06/13] PdfAnnotation: Removed duplicated set rect on constructor

Hello Francesco, hello all, > On 22 February 2018 at 12:20 Francesco Pretto wrote: > > > --- > src/doc/PdfAnnotation.cpp | 4 > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/doc/PdfAnnotation.cpp b/src/doc/PdfAnnotation.cpp > index a02f05d..f95e82c 100644 > ---

Re: [Podofo-users] [PATCH 05/13] PdfPagesTree::InsertPage: Fix "atIndex" is really a 0-based index

Hello Francesco, hello all, > On 23 February 2018 at 01:05 Francesco Pretto <cez...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 23 February 2018 at 00:13, Matthew Brincke <ma...@mailbox.org> wrote: > > where did it crash? What kind of crash was it, please? I've looked in > &g

Re: [Podofo-users] [PATCH 03/13] PdfPainter: Removed unneed cast

Hello Francesco, hello all, > On 22 February 2018 at 12:20 Francesco Pretto wrote: > > > PdfImage is a PdfXObject > --- > src/doc/PdfPainter.cpp | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/doc/PdfPainter.cpp b/src/doc/PdfPainter.cpp >

Re: [Podofo-users] [PATCH 05/13] PdfPagesTree::InsertPage: Fix "atIndex" is really a 0-based index

Hello Francesco, hello all, > On 22 February 2018 at 12:20 Francesco Pretto wrote: > > > This is also specified in the API documentation. Without the fix > there was a crash trying to insert page at index 0 where did it crash? What kind of crash was it, please? I've looked in

Re: [Podofo-users] Watermarks?

Hello Olivier, hello all, On 22 February 2018 at 17:54 Olivier Mascia wrote: > > > Dear all, > > How about watermarking pages? > Either with text, images or PDF pages? > I'm no expert for "watermarking", especially about securing/hardening against removal of such a watermark

Re: [Podofo-users] BUG: Erase method from PdfOutlineItem sometimes segfaults

[grammar fix in quoted text ] > zyx has written on 28 April 2017 at 21:51: > > > On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 00:47 +0200, Matthias Brinke wrote: > > The patch and the sources for the test programs are attached here. > > Hi, Hello zyx, hello Dominik, hello all, > somewhat scare me. The part about

Re: [Podofo-users] Patch replaced: Wannabe-namespaced internal function converted to private method

an exception and losing info about them from the input. I'm thankfully looking forward to your answer in time. Best regards, mabri > Matthew Brincke <ma...@mailbox.org> wrote on 26 January 2018 at 18:08: > > > Hello zyx, hello all, > > > zyx <z...@gmx.us> has wr

[Podofo-users] test/unit/podofo-test EncodingTest (assertions fixed, 1 test still fails)

Hello all, after fixing the CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL and CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL_MESSAGE assertions in EncodingTest.cpp in svn r1884 [1], many of which had the "expected" and "actual" parameters swapped, one test still fails: the last assertion in EncodingTest::testDifferencesEncoding has "Expected: 0 -

Re: [Podofo-users] patch for CVE-2017-8054

Hello zyx, hello all, > zyx <z...@gmx.us> has written on 8 February 2018 at 10:32: > > > On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 00:13 +0100, Matthew Brincke wrote: > > If nobody beats me for the time to the commit, it will be fixed > > again from svn r1882 on: http://sour

Re: [Podofo-users] patch for CVE-2017-8054

Hello all, > Matthew Brincke <ma...@mailbox.org> has written on 8 February 2018 at 00:58: > > > Hello zyx, hello all, > > Matthew Brincke <ma...@mailbox.org> has written on 8 February 2018 at 00:13: > > > > > > Hello zyx, hello all, > > &g

Re: [Podofo-users] patch for CVE-2017-8054

Hello zyx, hello all, > Matthew Brincke <ma...@mailbox.org> has written on 8 February 2018 at 00:13: > > > Hello zyx, hello all, > > zyx <z...@gmx.us> has written on 4 February 2018 at 16:10: > > > > > > On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 07:34 +0100, zyx w

Re: [Podofo-users] patch for CVE-2017-8054

Hello zyx, hello all, > zyx has written on 4 February 2018 at 16:10: > > > On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 07:34 +0100, zyx wrote: > > I see. It looks like I did something wrong when testing the change. > > When trying once again now I can confirm what you see, the change > > does > > fix

Re: [Podofo-users] integer overflow in PdfObjectStreamParserObject::ReadObjectsFromStream (src/base/PdfObjectStreamParserObject.cpp)

Hello zyx, hello all, > zyx has written on 14 January 2018 at 13:34: > > > On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 16:59 -0500, Probe Fuzzer wrote: > > src/base/PdfObjectStreamParserObject.cpp:99:30: runtime error: signed > > integer overflow: 94 + 9223372036854775807 cannot be represented in > >

Re: [Podofo-users] Next PoDoFo Release 0.9.6

[ grammar fix in quoted text ] Hello Dominik, hello all, Dominik Seichter <domseich...@googlemail.com> wrote on 27 January 2018, 13:23: > > > Hi Matthew et al., > > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:35 PM, Matthew Brincke <ma...@mailbox.org> wrote: > >>

Re: [Podofo-users] Integer Overflow in PdfXRefStreamParserObject::ParseStream

Hello zyx, hello all, > zyx has written on 14 January 2018 at 11:55: > > > On Sat, 2018-01-06 at 09:25 -0500, Probe Fuzzer wrote: > > we found that on latest version of PoDoFo (RELEASE_0.9.5_rc1), > > Hi, > what is the RELEASE_0.9.5_rc1, please? The "rc1" suffix suggests

Re: [Podofo-users] Which image encoding does support PoDoFo library?

Hello Alexander, hello all, > Alexander Zaitsev has written on 27 January 2018 at 16:51: > > > Hello, > > Does PoDoFo support JPEG2000/JPEG and Jbig2 encodings? > > PoDoFo does only support the JPEG "encoding" (PDF standard: filter) yet. I don't know if any of the others

Re: [Podofo-users] Next PoDoFo Release 0.9.6

[ Left Dominik in To to help him follow this thread, fixed text typos ] Hello Dominik, hello all, > Dominik Seichter via Podofo-users has written on 26 January 2018 at 17:37: > > > Hi Mattia, >   > Thanks for the good summary! Let me comment on the open issues. >   > Unfixed security issues:

Re: [Podofo-users] Patch replaced: Wannabe-namespaced internal function converted to private method

Hello zyx, hello all, > zyx <z...@gmx.us> has written on 14 January 2018 at 11:40: > > > On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 00:59 +0100, Matthew Brincke wrote: > > > the internal function name PODOFO_Base14FontDef_FindBuiltinData > > > looks like it should be in a n

Re: [Podofo-users] patch for CVE-2017-8054

Hello zyx, hello Mattia, hello all, > zyx has written on 14 January 2018 at 11:23: > > > On Wed, 2017-12-27 at 09:16 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Somebody attached to the Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/860995 a > > patch for CVE-2017-8054. > > Hi, > thanks for the

Re: [Podofo-users] Parse error on Chromium generated PDFs

Hello zyx, hello all, > zyx has written on 14 January 2018 at 15:42: > > > On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 18:34 +0100, le...@free.fr wrote: > > After some digging, Chromium / Skia do not store annotations as > > references, but directly as dictionnary under /Annots. > > Here is a simple

Re: [Podofo-users] Fix for the "could avoid useless dependency" Debian build warning

Hello all, hello Mattia, hello zyx, > Mattia Rizzolo has written on 14 January 2018 at 13:34: > > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 01:18:58PM +0100, zyx wrote: > > could you provide the exact warning you are referring to and in which > > stage (some context) it had been written, please? I do not

[Podofo-users] Fix for the "could avoid useless dependency" Debian build warning

Hello all, the patch for that is attached, please accept. It's made against version 0.9.5, but to parts of CMakeLists.txt files which haven't been changed there (& context) since then AFAIK. I've build-tested with sbuild into an (up-to-date, minimal except for GNU autotools, maybe that's needed

Re: [Podofo-users] [no-feature fix] Empty decoded stream of CCITTFaxDecode decoder

-to-date) chroot, I couldn't run-test it for lack of a suitable input file or tool to generate one (netpbm is so old even in Debian sid) ;-(. Best regards, mabri > Matthew Brincke <ma...@mailbox.org> has written on 16 November 2017 at 16:59: > > > Hello Luke, hello all, >

[Podofo-users] Wannabe-namespaced internal function converted to private method

Hello all, the internal function name PODOFO_Base14FontDef_FindBuiltinData looks like it should be in a namespace and a class IMHO, therefore I've converted it to a private method with access only from PdfFontFactory. I've also implemented a wrapper method IsBase14Font() to give the class

Re: [Podofo-users] How to extract embedded file from pdf

in the address: podofo-users AT list.sourceforge.net Best regards, mabri -- Original message -- From: David Swank <dsw...@tslusa.biz> To: Matthew Brincke <ma...@mailbox.org> Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 07:19:17 -0500 Subject: Re: [Podofo-users] How to extract embedded f

Re: [Podofo-users] How to extract embedded file from pdf

Hello David, hello all, > David Swank has written on 27 Dezember 2017 at 22:47: > > Environment Msys on Win7.  Qt 5.9.2, MinGw 7.2.0, PoDoFo .0.9.5.0 > I am able to Attach my csv files into a pdf just fine. > Now I am attempting to retrieve the attachments so that i

Re: [Podofo-users] Next release ? Many CVE's

Hello Mattia, hello zyx, hello all, > Mattia Rizzolo has written on 8 December 2017 at 17:38: > > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 09:57:46AM -0500, Peter Linnell wrote: > > As I maintain Podofo for openSUSE, there are now a fair amount of CVE's > > against Podofo with fixes in trunk. I'm wondering

Re: [Podofo-users] MRC compression support

age pointers only). Best regards, mabri > > 18.11.2017 14:47, Matthew Brincke пишет: > > Hello all, > > > >> zamazan4ik has written on 18 November 2017 at 00:18: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> Has PoDoFo library support for MRC compress

Re: [Podofo-users] MRC compression support

Hello all, > zamazan4ik has written on 18 November 2017 at 00:18: > > Hello, > > Has PoDoFo library support for MRC compression? Are there segmentator in > the library? Or maybe are there some stuff for writing different layers > with different compression algorithms? > the PoDoFo library

Re: [Podofo-users] Empty decoded stream of CCITTFaxDecode decoder

Hello Luke, hello all, > Luke Kennedy has written on 9 August 2017 at 13:10: > > Hi all, > > As mentioned in further details here  > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45548467/empty-decoded-stream-of-ccittfaxdecode-decoder-using-podofo > > … we’ve hit an issue with

Re: [Podofo-users] podofo-0.9.5 for fedora25

Hello Alex, hello all, > Alex has written on 13 November 2017 at 01:18: > > > Hi, does anyone have a working version of podofo-0.9.5 for fedora25? > It ships with 0.9.1, and 0.9.5 doesn't easily compile: > > Found cppunit. Unit tests will be built. > -- Found OpenSSL:

Re: [Podofo-users] ABI fix for the fix CVE-2017-5852

Hello Mattia, > Mattia Rizzolo has written on 23. Oktober 2017 at 11:10: > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 05:20:31PM +0200, Matthew Brincke wrote: > > Debian bug 854600 [2], I wonder why no one answered to the last post ...) > > My fault. > TBH, I totally forgot of that. I s

Re: [Podofo-users] License header missing in some files (was: Re: podofosign compile errors under MSVC)

Hi zyx, > zyx <z...@gmx.us> has written on 23 Oktober 2017 at 10:14: > > > On Sun, 2017-10-22 at 17:44 +0200, Matthew Brincke wrote: > > Can I just send a patch to add the copyright & GNU LGPL license > > headers (as it's hopefully understood that all t

[Podofo-users] License header missing in some files (was: Re: podofosign compile errors under MSVC)

Hello all, > Peter Petrov has written on 1 March 2017 at 09:29: > > Dear zyx, > > Thank you for your patch! > > Just off-topic, I noticed that this file (src/base/PdfCompilerCompatPrivate.h) > > doesn't contain GNU Library General Public License copyright header. > > Also

Re: [Podofo-users] ABI fix for the fix CVE-2017-5852

Hello zyx, hello all, > zyx has written on 22 October 2017 at 15:34: > > On 21.10.2017 0:59, Matthew Brincke wrote: > > attached is a patch against trunk r1860 (diff -up in svn format) for > > fixing the ABI (changing it back to the 0.9.5 state for t

[Podofo-users] ABI fix for the fix CVE-2017-5852

Hello all, attached is a patch against trunk r1860 (diff -up in svn format) for fixing the ABI (changing it back to the 0.9.5 state for the method PdfPage::GetInheritedKeyFromObject() after the fix for CVE-2017-5852). I'm sorry to not have tested it because the security policy of the system I'm

Re: [Podofo-users] Podofocolor error

Hello Matt, hello all, currently on encountering an unsupported color space, the information about it is discarded, so no output file can be produced in that case. I don't have time to rectify that currently, sorry. Best regards, mabri > Matt S Rinc has written on 26. Juli 2017

Re: [Podofo-users] Signing encrypted pdfs

Hello all, > "F. E." has written on 1 August 2017 at 15:00: > > Hello dear podofo users, > > I want to sign an already encrypted pdf using podofo, but I don't get it > to work: ... snip ... > 3.) Ok, so I thought, maybe I've got to set the security options again > after

  1   2   >