On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 02:46:02PM -0700, Qmail wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Is there any way to use rblsmtpd to simply set a header in qmail, rather
> than bouncing emails?
Already posted the URL some weeks ago,
http://www.lamer.de/maex/creative/software/qmail/
--
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Derek Callaway wrote:
> Hi, I'm having a problem with my qmail smtpd server becoming unresponsive
> when rblsmtpd cannot communiate with the RBL nameservers. Has anyone else
>From the manual page at http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/rblsmtpd.html:
-C: (Default.) Handle RBL looku
>2) Did you actually pay MAPS for use of their mail-abuse.org
>servers? They started charging on August 1st so you are
>not going to have much luck using them to block spam if you
>aren't paying them.
Have you looked at the price list? The price for individual users is
$0. If you want to keep
I list some alternatives to MAPS's RBLs, along with some other
spam-prevention techniques, here:
http://www.summersault.com/chris/techno/qmail/qmail-antispam.html
http://www.summersault.com/chris/techno/qmail/qmail-antispam.html#resources
Chris
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Derek Callaway wrote:
> On T
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 02:58:08PM -0400, Derek Callaway wrote:
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u 7791 -g 2108 -v 0 smtp fixcrio
>/usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -t 7 /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -t 7 -r dialups.mail-abuse.org
>/usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -t 7 -r 'relays.mail-abuse.org:Open rela
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 04:54:02PM +0800, Adrian Ho wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 03:33:53PM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
> Actually, I'd bet it's a DNS problem, not an rblsmtpd one. I'd also bet
[snip]
Ah yes, right you are. I thought rblsmtpd would look it up directly.
Adding the subdomain rb
You will need to pay MAPS to use one of its three RBLs, or the combined
RBL+.
Please see http://www.mail-abuse.org/subscription.html and
http://www.mail-abuse.org/feestructure.html
even you are with an educational institution.
Dr. Dan Bernstein himself has given up on MAPS's RBLs:
P
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Derek Callaway wrote:
> Right, I guess I should have said that I already read those pages before I
> posted this message. I'm looking for a _free_ workaround to this problem.
>
> TIA
There is no workaround. The resolver is going to wait for the connection
to time out, thus c
> Hi, I'm having a problem with my qmail smtpd server becoming unresponsive
> when rblsmtpd cannot communiate with the RBL nameservers.
http://www.mail-abuse.org/subscription.html
Mads
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Chin Fang wrote:
Right, I guess I should have said that I already read those pages before I
posted this message. I'm looking for a _free_ workaround to this problem.
TIA
> You will need to pay MAPS to use one of its three RBLs, or the combined
> RBL+.
>
> Please see http://
Derek,
I see a number of problems with the text you copied in
there, it's very confusing. Here's the questions and issues:
1) On line 2, you're calling rblsmtpd and having it call
rblsmtpd, which then calls rblsmtpd for a third time on
line 3. The first instance doesn't even have argu
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 03:33:53PM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
> The problem is that rblsmtpd doesnt seem to do any lookup to it at all.
Actually, I'd bet it's a DNS problem, not an rblsmtpd one. I'd also bet
you made the erroneous assumption that '-a rbl.unet.net.ph' tells
rblsmtpd to send TXT q
w I can log only in my qmail log ?
Thanks very much.
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 3:12 AM
To: Mailing-List Qmail
Subject: Re: rblsmtpd
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 11:50:19PM +0200, NDSoftware wrote:
> [xxx@xxx /home]#
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 11:50:19PM +0200, NDSoftware wrote:
> [xxx@xxx /home]# rblsmtpd: 129.132.2.199 pid 7941: 451 Open relay.
> Please see http://orbz.org/?129.132.2.199
> rblsmtpd: 129.132.2.199 pid 8799: 451 Open relay. Please see
> http://orbz.org/?129.132.2.199
>
> Why this warning aren't
>rblsmtpd with qmail does not accept mail from a blacklisted
>IP to postmaster@my-qmail-host, does it?
>
>That seems to me like as a violation of rfc1123, 5.2.7 which says:
>
> 5.2.7 RCPT Command: RFC-821 Section 4.1.1
>
> A host that supports a receiver-SMTP MUST support the reserved
>
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 11:27:23AM +0200, torben fjerdingstad wrote:
> rblsmtpd with qmail does not accept mail from a blacklisted
> IP to postmaster@my-qmail-host, does it?
No.
> That seems to me like as a violation of rfc1123, 5.2.7 which says:
Nope.
>5.2.7 RCPT Command: RFC-821 Section
"John McCoy, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I noticed when I implemented rblsmtpd that several legitimate sites were
> being blocked. They were mostly other .edu sites. Is there any way to create
> a list of exceptions, hopefully with a wild card so I could allow all .edu
> traffic to pass re
On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, Chris Johnson wrote:
> If you're using the latest version of rblsmtpd--the one that comes
> with ucspi-tcp--there's no -R option. See
> http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/rblsmtpd.html
I guess the new syntax didn't make it into the man pages. Thanks for the
URL.
--
Todd A. Jacobs
Co
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 04:08:17PM -0800, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> I'm trying to run rblsmtd with protection if the lookup fails. According
> to both the rblsmtpd usage output and the man page, the -R flag should do
> this. However, tcpserver contains this log fragment:
If you're using the latest
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 04:08:17PM -0800, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> And the undocumented -a flag is presumably the A record lookup enabled by
> the patch for rblsmtpd, right?
-a is not undocumented, and your presumption is incorrect.
> My /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run now looks like:
>
> #
Hello Mate
On 29-Jan-01, you wrote:
>> I did note in the earlier mail that rblsmtpd is now in the ucspi-tcp
>> program and has a -a query. The only thing about this is why it
>> says "anti-listed" instead of listed.
>
>
> Perhaps you want to read the docs for rblsmtpd for the meaning of the
>
> I did note in the earlier mail that rblsmtpd is now in the ucspi-tcp
> program and has a -a query. The only thing about this is why it
> says "anti-listed" instead of listed.
Perhaps you want to read the docs for rblsmtpd for the meaning of the
-a flag.
Unpatched rblsmtpd blocks using TXT re
Hello Peter
On 25-Jan-01, you wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 02:06:58PM -0500, Martin Randall wrote:
> [snip]
>> Whilst I'm hereI noticed that most mail servers connecting have
>> cutomised greetings and endings during the 220, 250 and 221 responses. I
>> searched the docs plus Dave Sills
Martin Randall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Whilst I'm hereI noticed that most mail servers connecting have
> cutomised greetings and endings during the 220, 250 and 221 responses. I
> searched the docs plus Dave Sills archives but couldn't find anything on
> this.
Naturally qmail provides
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 02:06:58PM -0500, Martin Randall wrote:
[snip]
> Whilst I'm hereI noticed that most mail servers connecting have
> cutomised greetings and endings during the 220, 250 and 221 responses. I
> searched the docs plus Dave Sills archives but couldn't find anything on
> this
Hello Chris
On 25-Jan-01, you wrote:
>
> I think this last entry requires a patched rbslmptd. You could instead
> use:
>
> -r relays.msci.memphis.edu
>
> relays.msci.memphis.edu is a mirror of relays.mail-abuse.org, but it runs
> Dan's rbldns and gives out the TXT record that rblsmtpd needs.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 04:35:58AM -0500, Robin S. Socha wrote:
> * Agi Subagio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010125 03:00]:
> > How to add more rblsmtpd process to check another blacklist resource like
> > "relays.mail-abuse.org", "blackholes.mail-abuse.org" or
> > "dialups.mail-abuse.org"?
>
> (lart@s
* Agi Subagio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010125 03:00]:
> How to add more rblsmtpd process to check another blacklist resource like
> "relays.mail-abuse.org", "blackholes.mail-abuse.org" or
> "dialups.mail-abuse.org"?
(lart@socha):(~)$ cat /service/smtp/run
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
NOFILESG
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Markus Stumpf wrote:
> This lists are irrelevant for attacks and security through obscurity is
> no security at all.
The peoples, who manages with RBL could inform admin of tested
host prior to begin such tests. If test had presented insecurity or
open relay possibilities, O
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 10:12:48AM +0100, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
> ORBS and like ORBS lists
> there are stupid idea, which makes more evil than good. First of all
> from such as ORBS 'insecure hosts' list" are using all presented on Net
> hacers, who have directly listing of host, which potent
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 11:10:37AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> question is: Is there anyway of notifying the person who sent the
> mail to you through the open relay, with a generic message that
> they were blocked. Say "Your message could not be processed by
> our server." If anyone coul
Hello
> Hi,
> Can anyone please advise me if there is anyway of telling
> an attacker if you like that they have been blocked via an email or
> something similiar. I am having the problem that people are getting
> blocked however it appears the mail goes through but is then not
> re
Alex Pennace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 04:21:15PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 1.can I install ucspi-unix,not install ucspi-tcp?
>
> I am not familiar with "ucspi-unix."
It is an implementation of the ucspi protocol running over Unix domain sockets
instead of TC
Keep in mind you will get a faster response if you return your queries
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 04:21:15PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1.can I install ucspi-unix,not install ucspi-tcp?
I am not familiar with "ucspi-unix."
> 2.After install ucspi-tcp,qmail-1.03+16patche
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:08:45PM +0800, shaolei wrote:
> when I install rblsmtpd-0.70-1.i386.rpm
> it need qmail-smtpd>=qmail-smtpd>=1.03+patches-7,
> after I install qmail-smtpd>=1.03+patches-16
> it need ucspi-tcp>=0.86-1
> so I install ucspi-tcp and qmail-smtpd
> but when I tried to install r
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 09:37:40AM -0300, Roberto Samarone Araujo (RSA) wrote:
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -b 64 -c 64 -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -g 82 -u 82 -t 600
> 0 /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 |
> /var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd &
You're missing the port argument. You need
>
> Your startup script is messed up. Post it and someone will tell you how to
fix
> it.
>
Ok ...
I put in my qmail.rc this :
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -b 64 -c 64 -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -g 82 -u 82 -t 600
0 /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 |
/var/qmai
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 09:00:04AM -0300, Roberto Samarone Araujo (RSA) wrote:
> I turned on my firewall and I looked at my logs when I found this message:
>
> smtpd: 975401579.539737 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out
> port number for /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd
>
> What's
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 10:28:48AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 09:55:53AM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 07:08:28AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> > > but would not it be relatively simple to implement a server software
> > > using tcpserver t
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 07:06:47PM -0500, Chris Hardie wrote:
> -If rblsmtpd can't talk to the RBL server, what sort of error does it
> issue to the connecting server? Temporary or permanent? Is it just the
> default 60 second timeout?
>From http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/rblsmtpd.html:
There are
Manuel,
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Manuel Gisbert wrote:
> Anyone ever used DJBs rblsmtp daemon to prevent spam?
> Could someone tell me where to insert rblsmtpd in my ../supervise/run
> script.
> The docs at cr.yp.to are a bit thin, at least for me ;-)
>
> my current run script looks like the followi
try:
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -R -l mydomain -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u \
$QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/rblsmtpd \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1
and you should be set.
-steve
On 09/05/00 @ 03:26PM, Manuel Gisbert wrote:
> Anyone ever used DJBs rblsmtp daemon to prevent s
You're right -- there's no doubt that the TXT record is useful (or was
;-) ). But my point is that the lookups (according to the spec) were to be
done on A records, and the TXT records fetched if you wanted that
description. This is two lookups, so no qmail person would settle for that
(humour).
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 06:34:21PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> The best approach to this is to have rblsmtpd use A records, as it should
> have from the beginning (that's what you get for optimising solely for
> speed, not for correctness).
But then the TXT record is really useful: it does
- Original Message -
From: "Mate Wierdl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 09:55:53AM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 07:08:28AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> >
> > That would not allow for the rapid changes necessary in a blackhole
> > list. Imagine you
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 09:55:53AM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 07:08:28AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
>
> > BTWY, I know many people are attached to using DNS for rbl lookups,
> > but would not it be relatively simple to implement a server software
> > using tcpserver that
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 07:08:28AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> BTWY, I know many people are attached to using DNS for rbl lookups,
> but would not it be relatively simple to implement a server software
> using tcpserver that would just lookup an IP number in a .cdb database
> of IP numbers, and s
Actually, no. The output from one is automatically sent to the input of the
next as they execute each other. The "\"'s are to allow the commands to be
on multiple lines.
- Original Message -
> * Robert Sander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11 Aug 2000 04:07]:
> > It seems to me that rblsmtpd can
I'm using it too -- but everything seemed fine with the patch so ...
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Rust" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Odd that this issue has been so quiet. Are there really so few people
> using rblsmtpd?
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 07:13:05AM -0400, Russell P. Sutherland wrote:
> * Robert Sander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11 Aug 2000 04:07]:
>
> > It seems to me that rblsmtpd can only take one "-r" at a time, as I have
> > version 0.70 that may be a bit old. But they can be ordered in a row, as
> > in
> >
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 07:13:05AM -0400, Russell P. Sutherland wrote:
> * Robert Sander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11 Aug 2000 04:07]:
>
> > It seems to me that rblsmtpd can only take one "-r" at a time, as I have
> > version 0.70 that may be a bit old. But they can be ordered in a row, as
> > in
> >
* Robert Sander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11 Aug 2000 04:07]:
> It seems to me that rblsmtpd can only take one "-r" at a time, as I have
> version 0.70 that may be a bit old. But they can be ordered in a row, as
> in
>rblsmtpd -r rbl.maps.vix.com \
>rblsmtpd -r dul.maps.vix.com \
>rblsmtpd
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 09:33:22AM -0700, Jon Rust wrote:
> /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -b -t10\
>-r rbl.maps.vix.com \
>-r dul.maps.vix.com \
>-r relays.mail-abuse.org
It seems to me that rblsmtpd can only take one "-r" at a time, as I have
version 0.70 that
I've been reading more of the archives about this
rblsmtpd issue lately and I think what has happened
is that the relays.mail-abuse.org DNS no longer
has the TXT entries in it that rblsmtpd looks for.
Did this spam that got through your server come
from a host in the open-relays database or the
ma
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 12:55:57PM -0400, Hubbard, David wrote:
> I've been reading more of the archives about this
> rblsmtpd issue lately and I think what has happened
> is that the relays.mail-abuse.org DNS no longer
> has the TXT entries in it that rblsmtpd looks for.
> Did this spam that got
Jon Rust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 10 August 2000 at 10:35:18 -0700
> Odd that this issue has been so quiet. Are there really so few people
> using rblsmtpd?
Nothing to say. I need to apply the patch and update my config lines,
but haven't yet.
--
Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ Mi
Jon Rust wrote:
>
> See 'man rblsmtpd'.
:-) No man page for rblsmtpd, at least on my 6-month old package.
Docs are actually on the rblsmtpd download page.
[snip.]
> > Some rather basic questions
> >
> > How do I set the $RBLSMTPD environment variable in order for rblsmtpd to
> > block
See 'man rblsmtpd'. Briefly, you don't set the var normally. If the var
is set, but empty, rblsmtpd won't block the mail in any case. If the var
is set to an actual value, it will block the mail. You can set the var
in your tcp.smtp CDB file like so:
63.88.133.:allow,RBLSMTPD="-Yesmail email is
www.qmail.org
download ucspi-tcp-0.88 its included in the package... docs are also on
the site.
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Slider wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Some rather basic questions
>
> How do I set the $RBLSMTPD envi
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 05:27:28PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> I would like to offer an option similar to pobox.com's [spam: 84%]
> "Subject:" munging for incoming messages from RBL or RSS listed sites.
> Instead of actually bouncing the message as RBLSMTPD does, allow the
> message but add
Scratch that last one. Got it working. Had to specify the IP address in
the tcpserver command line. Instead of:
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -u 102 -g 100 -x /usr/local/etc/ip/tcp.smtp.cdb
smtp 0
I had replace '0' with the IP of my machine. Alls good now. Thanks
everyone, for your help!
-Aar
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Eric Cox wrote:
>
>
> Aaron Nowalk wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Peter Green wrote:
> >
> > > also sprach amnowalk:
> > > > root@xx:/usr/local/bin# env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd -r
> > > > maps.vix.com echo whoops
> > > > whoops
> > >
> > > The zone is ``rb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11 Jul 00, at 15:24, Aaron Nowalk wrote:
> So that appears to work. Now, heres with the -r option:
>
> root@xx:/usr/local/bin# env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd -r
> maps.vix.com echo whoops whoops
>
> So with the -r option, it looks like
Aaron Nowalk wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Peter Green wrote:
>
> > also sprach amnowalk:
> > > root@xx:/usr/local/bin# env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd -r
> > > maps.vix.com echo whoops
> > > whoops
> >
> > The zone is ``rbl.maps.vix.com'', NOT simply ``maps.vix.com''. :)
> >
>
> Tri
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Peter Green wrote:
> also sprach amnowalk:
> > Heres what I get when I try it without any options from the command line:
> >
> > root@xx:/usr/local/bin# env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd echo whoops
> > rblsmtpd: pid 6387: 451 Blackholed - see
> > http://mail-abuse.org/
also sprach amnowalk:
> Heres what I get when I try it without any options from the command line:
>
> root@xx:/usr/local/bin# env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd echo whoops
> rblsmtpd: pid 6387: 451 Blackholed - see
> http://mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/lookup?127.0.0.2>
> 220 rblsmtpd.local
> quit
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11 Jul 00, at 14:31, Aaron Nowalk wrote:
> > > 3. Does "relays.radparker.com" really live? To me it seems it's
> > > dead.
> > I can ping it and I've tried changing the hostname to
> > maps.vix.com in the tcpserver rc script.
>
> Well y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11 Jul 00, at 14:31, Aaron Nowalk wrote:
> > 3. Does "relays.radparker.com" really live? To me it seems it's
> > dead.
> I can ping it and I've tried changing the hostname to
> maps.vix.com in the tcpserver rc script.
Well yes, it pings, but do
Hi. Thanks for responding! I'll answer your questions one at a time:
> Hi,
>
> 1. Is all the stuff on one line?
Yes.
> 2. Does rblsmtpd really live in /usr/local/bin?
Yes.
> 3. Does "relays.radparker.com" really live? To me it seems it's
> dead.
I can ping it and I've tried changing the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11 Jul 00, at 14:02, Aaron Nowalk wrote:
> I've been working on this all day again! Anyone out there have _any_
> suggestions? Once again, heres the info:
>
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -u 102 -g 100 -x /usr/local/etc/ip/tcp.smt
> p.cdb 0 smtp /u
I've been working on this all day again! Anyone out there have _any_
suggestions? Once again, heres the info:
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -u 102 -g 100 -x /usr/local/etc/ip/tcp.smt
p.cdb 0 smtp /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -rrelays.radparker.com
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1
I'm running qmail1-03 on
I've tried it both ways. Doesn't seem to make a difference :(
-Aaron Nowalk
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| Systems Engineer - Stargate Industries, LLC |
| mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.stargate.net |
| 412.316.7827 412.316.7899 |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Aaron Nowalk wrote:
>
> Hi! I'm in dire need of some help here. I've been working on getting
> rblsmtpd up and running with tcpserver and am having no luck at all. I've
> searched the mailing list back and fourth and still can't find a
> thing. Heres what I got:
>
> tcpserver invocation:
>
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 09:39:41AM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote:
>
> rblsmtpd lets you invoke multiple instances of itself. Aaron's patch
> allows you to avoid an extra exec() of the same program.
Ah! I see. I guess I'll keep an eye on the load and see what happens as I add
other listings. My MX
Mark E. Drummond writes:
> I am a bit confused ... I am looking at Aaron Nabil's patch to allow rblsmtpd
> to use multiple listing services ... but does rblsmtpd not already support
> multiple services? Of course it does, I'm using the rbl and relays.mail-abuse
> right now. Why the patch?
rbl
The patch is now in production use on my mail system and nothing
has exploded yet.
http://www.spiritone.com/~nabil/multirbls.diff
nabil writes...
>Since I didn't see any in the mailing list archives, here are some diffs
>to patch rblsmtpd to support multiple RBL's. Caveat is that I've only
>
On Mon, May 03, 1999 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Barton wrote:
> Hi,
> I am running rblsmtpd under tcpserver, and I
> would like the error messages to be saved to
> a log file instead of being directed to stderr.
>
> Is there a way that I can do this?
Pipe the output to splogger or cyclog (which co
From: Peter Gradwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: If so, would it be possible to have rblsmtpd actually bounce the mail
: for people on the dul list?
:
: It seems you can't win really :-(
Using -b on the command line will tell rblsmtpd to use a permanent error
code (553) instead of a temporary one.
-
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Peter Gradwell wrote:
[snip]
> Given that rblsmtpd only ever defer's mail, and it doesn't actually
> reject it (to give sys admins time to fix their broken systems) is it
> likely that the spam is going to reach me via my relay every time?
>
> If so, would it be possible t
Peter Gradwell writes:
> now, polaris.uk.insnet.net is my secondary mail relay. the spammer
> will have tried to deliver this mail to ice.gradwell.com, however, it
> will have been blackholed because I'm running rblsmtpd using the DUL
> MAPS list to filter my mail.
Now you're finding out w
On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 11:00:04AM -0500, Timothy L. Mayo wrote:
> You cannot specify two separate -r parameters to 1 instance of rblsmtpd.
> You must run two separate rblsmtpd instances. The first one runs the
> second.
Clumsy. But it works now, with two instances of rblsmtpd.
Thanks to all.
>
You cannot specify two separate -r parameters to 1 instance of rblsmtpd.
You must run two separate rblsmtpd instances. The first one runs the
second.
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, torben fjerdingstad wrote:
> I have verified that orbs's host are not blocked with my
> setup. I dont see what's wrong. What
82 matches
Mail list logo
