://smtpd.github.io/qpsmtpd/
A bunch of you have commit access there now and also to the main repository:
https://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd/
Thank you for all the fun over the last ~12 years. :-)
Ask
--
Ask Bjørn Hansen, http://askask.com/
On Jun 3, 2012, at 19:00, Matt Simerson wrote:
removed hook_connect, unnecessary.
I think it's there so if you log or otherwise use the note, it'll be reasonably
initialized.
- if ($badcmdcount = $self-{_unrec_cmd_max}) {
-my $msg = Closing connection, $badcmdcount unrecognized
Applied.
Applied. Also the ; fix in badrcptto.
On Jun 4, 2012, at 9:32, Charlie Brady wrote:
-use Time::HiRes qw(gettimeofday tv_interval);
use Qpsmtpd::Constants;
+use Time::HiRes qw(gettimeofday tv_interval);
+
Is the change in ordering here accidental, gratuitous, or is there some
hidden functional significance?
I think Matt
On Jun 1, 2012, at 20:25, Matt Simerson m...@tnpi.net wrote:
Which is preferred within a plugin?
$self-qp-connection-notes
or
$self-connection-notes
Assuming the second method is just a proxy for the first, then use the shorter
version.
Ask
On May 21, 2012, at 0:59, Matt Simerson wrote:
Please combine this into the previous patch. Actually, I applied it
anyway, see below.
Most of the patches that are related, or are very big, are in their own
branch, and I've pushed the branches to github as well. Perhaps it would be
On Apr 28, 2012, at 13:41, Robert Spier rsp...@pobox.com wrote:
One thing that would help is if you could split your changes into multiple
pull requests -- if we're going to try using github as our mechanism, every
pull request should be for one feature. There's a lot of your changes
pending
On Apr 7, 2012, at 17:14, Matt Simerson wrote:
Available on github:
https://github.com/msimerson/qpsmtpd/commit/ed8eca0a630be3a100840a247f7a8305bfae15c4
Apparently the format of vpopmaild responses has been expanded and the
responses
are conditional.
Thanks, I added this to the
On Jul 27, 2011, at 16:41, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
I use dnscache on my home network and would like to know why anybody
decide to move from dnscache.
Performance, IPv6 support, ease of maintenance (when using dnscache I often end
with subtly differently patched versions; frustrating).
On Jul 28, 2011, at 11:28, Charlie Brady wrote:
I use dnscache on my home network and would like to know why anybody
decide to move from dnscache.
Performance,
Could you supply some details, please?
Off the top of my head the two things I'd run into are the outstanding requests
limit
On Mar 10, 2011, at 19:41, Chris Lewis wrote:
I think we'd be better served by coming up with, for example, a qpsmtpd way
of doing this sort of thing.
For example: for basic RCPT TO functionality, have a basic RCPT time plugin
that can handle aliasing, allowable domain relays, lists of
On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:49, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Should we have plugins/qmail and plugins/postfix dirs?
I like that idea.
- ask
I agree that sharing code should be possible here (and that would be
desirable); but as Matt suggested using the plugin inheritance stuff would be
better than (eventually) making the One True Spam Fighting plugin. :-)
- ask
On Dec 10, 2010, at 18:23, Walt Mankowski wrote:
I just tried to clone that repository and got the following error:
% git clone http://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd
Cloning into qpsmtpd...
fatal: http://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd/info/refs not found: did you run git
update-server-info on
I'm confused. It's a standard github repository. And being git it doesn't
matter too much where you clone from.
Browse changes, make a github fork etc:
https://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd
Clone over http:
git clone https://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd.git
Clone over git protocol:
On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:42, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Hm, well I give it a try again ;-)
For what it's worth, if I was starting a qpsmtpd-like thing from scratch today
I'd almost certainly make it AnyEvent based. :-)
- ask
On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:37, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Maybe we can make another benchmark AnyEvent vs Danga::Socket due to
the fact that AnyEvent with EV as underlaying event lib looks very fast
from the internet source ;-)
Matt was (I'm guessing) testing a load that's artificial to anyone
On Sep 24, 2010, at 14:49, Tony Lambiris wrote:
I have the plugin loaded: require_resolvable_fromhost and it never seems to
flag unresolvable MAIL FROM hosts:
Actually, it flags it but doesn't tell the client until RCPT TO. Some old
MTAs will get confused when being rejected at MAIL FROM.
On Sep 14, 2010, at 10:45, Tony Lambiris wrote:
Thoughts on the following changes to smtp-forward? These diffs were taken
against the svn smtp-forward checked out yesterday.
I didn't check if the patch still applies; but we moved to git a while ago:
http://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd
On Sep 14, 2010, at 7:49, David Favor wrote:
My primary challenge with exim is it's difficult to understand
configuration system and the random nature of exim suffering
from bitrot.
We're using qmail at perl.org and at work we use postfix (because it came with
the box) and both are just
On Sep 9, 2010, at 8:11, David Favor wrote:
I'm looking for a simple alternative to exim, sendmail, postfix
for outgoing email. [...]
It'd be easier to come with suggestions if you describe why
exim/sendmail/postfix/qmail don't fit your requirements. :-)
Hi everyone,
Charlie asked a question that reminded me that I don't think I mentioned this:
The canonical git repository is now
http://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd
I'll get the github people to update things so all the references to
abh/qpsmtpd (forks etc) will hopefully be automatically
On Jul 25, 2010, at 2:43, Jared Johnson wrote:
it will soon be hopelessly forked from normal QP on account of
per-recipient config directives, etc.
Having a common API for per-recipient things have long been on the todo list.
We've talked about it a couple times before; but the
On Jun 29, 2010, at 4:13, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
Summary:
For any given valid recipient, compare the sender whitelist of exact
matches and regexes. If the sender is NOT present, issue a permanant
deny (5xx).
Nice idea. Here at perl.org a human is (amazingly) moderating
On May 11, 2010, at 21:25, Robert Spier wrote:
Does anyone else have any opinions on doing a massive perltidy? I'm
on the fence.
I'm on the fence, too. My concern is mostly for the people with private
patches / hacked up versions. (Maybe that makes less sense than I think it
does).
How
Alright, i am if not convinced then at leadt outnumbered. :-) Let me
do some tests with the merges and I will make a new release shortly
and then do the perltidy.
--
http://localrobot.com/
On May 12, 2010, at 9:03, Charlie Brady charlieb-qpsm...@budge.apana.org.au
wrote:
+1
On Apr 14, 2010, at 17:19, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Can anyone remember the reason that the spool files aren't proper temp files
(deleted upon open)? We often end up with a hard restart of qpsmtpd and
having these files left around is annoying...
Just to come up with a different explanation
On Feb 14, 2010, at 19:22, Richard Siddall wrote:
I just merged the RPM packaging stuff Peter Holzer and Robin Bowes
made (over the last 5 years; don't say anything is being rushed
around here!) :-)
Attached is a diff that modifies the RPM packaging to produce an SRPM, and
also splits
On Apr 1, 2010, at 2:56, Steve wrote:
Hello list,
somehow I don't get a new line separating the mail body from the mail
headers. How can I enforce a new line between header and body?
I am using qpsmtp 0.83 and delivery to maildir.
Can you give an example of the SMTP transaction (the
On Apr 3, 2010, at 17:52, The Archer wrote:
And more all in the same test connection - what do these mean, if they are
supposed to decline the message why did the connection continue?
The 'DECLINE/DONE/...' logic is based more or less on the Apache API.
'DECLINED' here means I don't know,
Hi everyone,
FYI -- feedback welcome. I haven't had a chance to look.
- ask
Begin forwarded message:
From: GitHub nore...@github.com
Date: March 24, 2010 5:15:00 AM PDT
To: a...@develooper.com
Subject: [GitHub] typester sent you a pull request from typester/qpsmtpd
typester wants
Isn't there a connection note? A transaction is reset/initiated on
RSET and MAIL commands.
And doesn't the auth stuff store already then auth info?
--
http://localrobot.com/
On Mar 10, 2010, at 12:41 AM, Norman Maurer nor...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I'm in the need of lookup the
On Feb 17, 2010, at 8:28, Jost Krieger wrote:
If you do spamassassin and such, that will be the resource intensive
part. qpsmtpd might help over other MTAs though in filtering more of
the mail in cheaper ways first.
Yes, we do. But that's already perl right now. The hardest thing is
Tak Rasmus!
Could you make the diff with diff -u?
- ask
--
http://localrobot.com/
On Feb 18, 2010, at 14:18, Rasmus Skaarup ras...@gal.dk wrote:
Patch is attached. User can now choose between cram-md5 and plain
authentication. If no option is chosen, it defaults to cram-md5 -
On Feb 6, 2010, at 12:41, Larry Nedry wrote:
Here's my patch for require_resolvable_fromhost. As Chris Lewis suggested,
delaying rejection until the RCPT TO hook solved the problem.
Thank you for making a git repository with the change; I pulled it into my
branch.
- ask
here!) :-)
The shortlog since the last release (so far) is below.
- ask
Ask Bjørn Hansen (7):
Credit Jonathan Martens for his patch
Fix typo in default clamav configuration name
Update Changes
Fix to work with new git commands
Untabify
Fix rpmlint errors
On Jan 18, 2010, at 8:32, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
In mid-November I found a bug in Qpsmtpd::config. I created issue 29 on
Google Code (http://code.google.com/p/smtpd/issues/detail?id=29) and
some time later checked a fix into my github repository and
Hi Peter!
You did the right thing; except
On Dec 28, 2009, at 13:21, Larry Nedry wrote:
I'm installing qpsmtpd 0.83 on a new server running CentOS 5.4. When I run
make test I get an unexpected message, command not performed. Is this an
issue that I need to resolve?
Yeah - the test passes so all is well. I think it's just a test
On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:27, Peter Eisch wrote:
SetEnv QPSMTPD_CONFIG /home/smtpd/qpsmtpd.2/config
/VirtualHost
That doesn't appear to set the value where it can be picked up:
... $ENV{QPSMTPD_CONFIG} must be given at
/home/smtpd/qpsmtpd.vsi/lib/Apache/Qpsmtpd.pm line 26.\n
The
On Nov 29, 2009, at 16:25, Rick wrote:
Hi Rick!
I'm pretty sure Charlie wasn't just being stubborn but rather just trying to
figure out what the behavior really should be so we don't change it to work
compatibility with alpine just to break it with something else.
It's entirely possible that
On Nov 23, 2009, at 14:52, Matt Sergeant wrote:
There are also more other stuff available with AnyEvent -- I think it'd be
cool!
OK. How do I get this to you? It's basically just two new files, no patches
to anything.
Either make a github account, clone my repository and then:
git
On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:41, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Is anyone interested in an AnyEvent mode Qpsmtpd? I have the code written
(mostly hacked right now, but should work).
In theory it might be faster than the Danga::Socket based one, and AnyEvent
seems to receive regular updates more than
On Nov 23, 2009, at 12:08, Guy Hulbert wrote:
google: perl anyevent
yields: http://search.cpan.org/dist/AnyEvent/
is there a better starting point ?
I'm not exactly sure what your question is, but
http://search.cpan.org/search?query=anyevent
shows a sample of available event
On Nov 5, 2009, at 10:31, Shad L. Lords wrote:
This might not be the best place to fix this. The correct way would
be to fix header-add to always stick the headers at the top.
Sounds good to me. Would that mess up anything else?
On Oct 16, 2009, at 14:25, Steve Kemp wrote:
Maybe ask doesn't get much SPAM thanks to qpsmtpd, but
it might make sense ask people to send mail to this list:
Yeah; the link is more helpful (a...@develooper.com gets an insane
amount of spam; it surprises me that email is still functional
On Oct 17, 2009, at 13:01, viggy_prabhu wrote:
When I try to send a mail through telnet, I am getting the following
error,
FATAL PLUGIN ERROR [queue::qmail_2dqueue]: Can't call method print
on an undefined value at ./plugins/queue/qmail-queue line 60, STDIN
line 6.
Try using the 'swaks'
On Oct 1, 2009, at 7:13, Steve Kemp wrote:
This document might be interesting to other users
of qpsmtpd:
http://book.mail-scanning.com/
It describes how I implemented and managed the setup of a
qpsmtpd-based filtering service which rejected about 10 million
messages a month at the peak.
On Sep 22, 2009, at 6:24, Shiv Chourasia wrote:
I newly install QPSMTPD fork server which is running on 26 port and
sendmail on 25 port number.
Now,when i am trying to send a mail via qpsmtp it shows 451 Queuing
declined or disabled; try again later. error but same thing when
i'm trying
It's been 3 months since the last release, so here's another one. (I
was reminding by seeing a patch from Hinrik on github; his first -
welcome Hinrik!).
Thanks to everyone who contributed! There were 10 of you making
changes in this release (I messed up crediting Jonathan Martens in
On Sep 8, 2009, at 21:05, Jason Mills wrote:
So to the point of the question: Would anyone mind if I patched the
configuration stuff within Qpsmtpd to allow configuration minded
plugins
to alter/hook/stack into how Qpsmtpd discovers and utilizes cached
configuration values?
Show us a
On Aug 25, 2009, at 7:46, Matt Sergeant wrote:
I never understood why it did that. Any reason it can't return
either
undef or (preferably) a new Transaction object?
I don't really understand it either, and I fear that which I don't
understand, so I worry about taking it out and breaking
Anyone up for trying this on qpsmtpd? :-)
From: Martin Atkins m...@degeneration.co.uk
Date: August 18, 2009 7:28:29 AM GMT+08:00
To: Djabberd List djabb...@lists.danga.com
Subject: AnyEvent Implementation of Danga::Socket
Hi folks,
Last week I hacked up Danga::Socket and re-implemented its
On Aug 14, 2009, at 14:14, Jared Johnson wrote:
This should allow the logging/file plugin to log even if it isn't
called from
within a transaction
Thanks, applied and pushed.
The conditional around where you made the first change are a bit of a
mess (indicating that there's a better way
On Jul 30, 2009, at 16:13, Robin Bowes wrote:
Thanks for working on this Robin.
A couple of comments:
Could the VERSION stuff not be hardcoded?
It looks like qpsmtpd.spec and qpsmtpd.spec.in is the same, is that
right?
Would it be possible to make so making the .tar.gz will (with the
On Jul 29, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Larry Nedry wrote:
The require_resolvable_fromhost plugin returns DENYSOFT when a host
doesn't
resolve. This makes sense with a well behaved host. But I've
noticed that
some hosts that don't resolve will continuously retry and never seem
to
disconnect.
On Jul 29, 2009, at 12:07, Jared Johnson wrote:
We recently noticed a message in our postfix queue that thought it
was addressed to foo.com. After examining it, it turned out that
Qpsmtpd accepted a MAIL FROM command formatted like so:
MAIL FROM:u...@d.com,foo.com
Weird tha postfix
On Jul 20, 2009, at 1:04, Stefan Priebe wrote:
I'm using qpsmtpd 0.82 with qpsmtpd-prefork and have set up
config/timeout
=
30
Weird - the code (lib/Qpsmtpd/TcpServer/Prefork.pm#read_input) is
pretty straightforward. Maybe some goofy safe signals issue?
Most of the code in that method
On Jul 20, 2009, at 9:45, Stefan Priebe wrote:
[timeouts not working]
oh i'm really sorry - it was caused by a module config_cache which i
found somewhere in the net. When i disable it it works fine :-(
Weird -- what does that module/plugin do? It shouldn't make the
timeouts not work ...
On Jul 15, 2009, at 2:18, Robin Bowes wrote:
[pushing to github]
I already did! :)
Thanks. I'll look at it next week.
- ask
On Jul 14, 2009, at 15:54, Robin Bowes wrote:
How do you want me to get things into git? Should I send you
something,
or clone the repo and send a patch, or something? I'm a bit of a git
neophyte, I'm afraid.
Just clone the repository on github and then go crazy in your fork.
When you
On Jul 13, 2009, at 14:35, Robin Bowes wrote:
Well, I've done a fair bit of work on the existing spec file, and have
an 0.82 RPM, which builds directly from the git repository.
I'd be happy to make it all available, or even for it to be checked
into
git. I'd also be happy to take on the
On Jun 21, 2009, at 14:11, Tomas Lee wrote:
But in version 0.29, the check_relay plugin split into two plugins:
check_relay and rcpt_ok. rcpt_ok is the one that actually hooks
into RCPT now, so shouldn't the README file say rcpt_ok instead of
check_relay?
Thanks; that's almost 5 years out
On Jun 21, 2009, at 16:40, Tomas Lee wrote:
docs/config.pod says:
spool_dir
Where temporary files are stored, defaults to tmp/.
FIXME: is this correct?
That's not correct. It should be ~/tmp/, or as the README puts it,
$ENV{HOME}/tmp/.
Yup. Updated docs/config.pod in
With all the recent prefork fixes it seemed like a good idea to make
another release, so:
http://smtpd.develooper.com/get.html
:-)
- ask
0.82 - June 2, 2009
prefork: Fix problem with processes sometimes being left
behind (Charlie Brady)
prefork: Fix startup when no
On Jun 2, 2009, at 16:10, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
With all the recent prefork fixes it seemed like a good idea to make
another release, so:
http://smtpd.develooper.com/get.html
Oh, and if it hasn't been obvious from the list posts, this release is
entirely thanks to Charlie, Norman
On May 21, 2009, at 12:30, J wrote:
The prefork in 0.81 can only listen on one. The next release will
support
listening on multiple addresses ports in prefork, just as
forkserver does.
Any idea when that might be?
Probably in about 4-6 weeks. My plan is to do a release at least
On May 9, 2009, at 19:21, Charlie Brady wrote:
If the assertion that the existing old simple version is useless is
correct, is there much justification for keeping the old simple
version?
This is really a namespace issue, I think. Should check_spamhelo
belong to an old simple
On Apr 27, 2009, at 2:02, Norman Maurer wrote:
Here is a patch:
Thanks.
For next time: If you commit it to your local repository you can email
it in a ready to apply format with
git format-patch HEAD^..
git send-email 0001-*
:-)
- ask
On Apr 23, 2009, at 18:38, Baltasar Cevc wrote:
If it's still the old bad one, shouldn't we try to replace it in the
trunk? Do you happen to know Allans license? Would that be possible?
If not, I could try to create a new patch with similar functionality.
I've known Allan since sometime
On Apr 20, 2009, at 9:10, jan wrote:
i forward the mails via smtp plugin. Now the receiving Mailserver had
some Problems. How can i restart sending for mails in /var/spool/
qpsmtpd?
Hi Jan,
The default SMTP plugin doesn't queue the mails. The sending mail
servers should be resending
On Apr 21, 2009, at 10:15, GG Noris wrote:
is possible with the plugin greylisting check, for the remote_ip, only
for the /24 or C class of the IP ( aaa.bbb.ccc )?
Not by default. It shouldn't be too hard to add a mask feature
though (I'd recommend making it generic-ish, so you just
Thanks, I put it in my repository as e8ee72a.
- ask
In the spirit of getting a bit more frequent releases out, I tagged
v0.81. :-)
http://smtpd.develooper.com/get.html
- ask
0.81 - April 2, 2009
Close spamd socket after reading the result back (Jared Johnson)
p0f plugin updates (Tom Callahan)
Change
On Feb 10, 2009, at 3:54, Pedro Melo wrote:
What kind of disk space and bandwidth would this require?
The bandwidth is laughable, it totaled at 320 MiByte in December
and 280 MiByte in January. The months before it was somewhat more,
but never more than 1.2 GiByte. The files on disc are mere
On Feb 12, 2009, at 0:22, Robert Spier wrote:
Ah; git is great. :-) Basically this is like passing a patch
around,
but with tools that are made to work with it. (We could also have
had
three commits with two of them just having for the history books
useless tweaks).
Kind of. I used
On Feb 12, 2009, at 7:34, Jose Luis Martinez wrote:
I used to follow the actual commits via perl.qpsmtpd.dev news. Now
that git is around, is there any substitute?
I enabled that in github; we'll see how it works on the next change.
Otherwise there's also
On Feb 10, 2009, at 12:33, Hanno Hecker wrote:
Hanno - do you want to make a patch that removes README.plugins after
incorporating anything unique there into plugins.pod?
Done
http://github.com/vetinari/qpsmtpd/commit/4e892560eb8aa1074e2ce1548e6c337d0e19a0fb
Thanks. I tweaked the commit
I think Jose's argument was persuasive, let's just add it. I didn't
understand why one line resetting/setting/... the headers in the
transaction object was removed; but I didn't look that closely.
Karl - your English is better than many who pretend to be fluent or
even native speakers.
On Feb 9, 2009, at 23:58, Hanno Hecker wrote:
There should be a note in README.plugins, that the full documentation
of the hooks is in docs/plugins.pod ... (or replace it's entire
content
with a redirection do docs/plugins.pod)
Hanno - do you want to make a patch that removes
On Feb 10, 2009, at 2:43, Robert Spier wrote:
Committed as
http://github.com/rspier/qpsmtpd/commit/a0ae0453264fe8dd85c132f2e7305b5ac34bf7e8
Did you actually test that this worked? I had to tweak the code to
make it make sense. Also, you had a mix of tabs and spaces and didn't
follow the
Hi everyone,
I finally got the git repository ready! All the old branches are
grafted in so we have the complete history (there was one or two
merges I made up to best show the full history).
I also imported the actual contents of the .tar.gz releases, as it
turned out they were
Oh boy. We're way bikeshedding. Let's just leave the bikes [file
permissions] in the rain for now.
In more uplifting news I'm 98% done converting the svn repository to
git. I went a bit nuts wanting to get all the weird branch renames
and such we've done grafted together to make a
On Jan 23, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Robin Bowes wrote:
[Perlbal]
Are there any mailing lists?
yes - http://groups.google.com/group/perlbal
- ask
--
http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/
On Jan 21, 2009, at 11:20, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Should we fix qpsmtpd config loading to check for file permissions
as described in: http://use.perl.org/~Alias/journal/38319 ?
I think I'm inclined to agree with Charlie. We're not exactly an end-
user tool here.
OTOH then don't we
Hi everyone,
Let's move the qpsmtpd repository to git. It'll make it much much
easier for people to contribute; in particular since often people
developing on qpsmtpd basically have their private forks - with some
changes to be published and others not.
Test repository (it will
On Jan 3, 2009, at 2:10, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
On the topic of releasing, why isn't qpsmtpd released to CPAN?
Because we never really got it easily installable via the whole
Makefile.PL route.
Any specific problems? Is it because qpsmtpd can be installed in
several ways,
or is it just
On Jan 2, 2009, at 8:49, Robert Spier wrote:
Can anyone think of any cases where he leading/trailing whitespace in
config-file might be significant?
They should be quoted, escaped or something else then (which we'd then
support).
- ask
--
http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/
On Oct 21, 2008, at 11:47, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
I always found the rcpt_ok plugin in trunk/plugins rather useless for
two reasons:
As John pointed out; it was there to provide the basic work like
qmail-smtpd functionality. (Indeed I think it was part of the first
round of move
How about making qpsmtpd require Net::DNS 0.60 then?
- ask
On Sep 28, 2008, at 12:01 AM, Diego d'Ambra wrote:
my $res = new Net::DNS::Resolver;
$res-tcp_timeout(30);
$res-udp_timeout(30);
$res-srcport(1024+int(rand(64511)));
Shouldn't this fix be in Net::DNS::Resolver?
- ask
--
http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/
On Sep 15, 2008, at 13:40, Chris Lewis wrote:
According to the documentation, when you call
$transaction-body_filename, you get a temporary file name that points
at a file that contains the message. If you examine body_filename, it
has no headers.
It was made that way first because the
The inspiration for the file based plugins were Apache::Registry in
mod_perl -- hide as much of the nitty gritty as possible and allow the
user to just write the code that actually does stuff for them. On
that track then I think it's reasonable to add whatever boiler plate
code is
On Jul 11, 2008, at 3:00, Jared Johnson wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that our qpsmtpd-based product is not handling
extremely large messages particularly well. This was brought on by
a flood of delay notices for a 495MB message sent outbound through a
server not under our control. There
On Jun 27, 2008, at 3:43, Dale Gallagher wrote:
What exactly is the async version of qpsmtpd?
It's an event based version based on Danga::Socket (the same module
perlbal for example is built on).
Has anyone run qpsmtpd under PersistentPerl (a.k.a SpeedyCGI). There
is a mention of pperl,
On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:26 AM, John Peacock wrote:
We need to make sure the Changes file is up-to-date.
- ask
--
http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/
On Jun 2, 2008, at 7:04 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Wow, that seems MUCH worse to me - to have the logs *not* storing
the dns failure reason seems completely at odds to me with what logs
should be for.
I agree with that. Failures of any kind should always be logged.
- ask
--
Hi everyone,
Most plugins seem to use the whitelisthost connection note, but a
couple in the distribution are using whitelistclient. Any
objection to fixing those to be whitelistclient ? (whitelisthost
makes more sense to me, but most plugins uses the other one -
specifically the
On May 10, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Juerd Waalboer wrote:
1. The plugin loading code must be changed to allow loading Perl
modules
in addition to regular plugin files. I believe the changes would be
minimal.
I thought I did that a while ago - you should be able to put in a
module name in
On May 10, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Juerd Waalboer wrote:
If the whole idea is generally considered a good idea, I volunteer
to do
these things.
+1!
--
http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/
1 - 100 of 395 matches
Mail list logo
