Re: why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor???

2002-05-25 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 14:23 26 May 2002, Huter.Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I know the arrow key and the letter key can move cursor quite | well,but I'm wondering why not just use arrow key?so I think there's | now arrow key in the old keyboard and the old vi have *NO* choice but | use letter key to move c

Re: why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor???

2002-05-25 Thread Vidiot
>hi,Vidiot! > I know the arrow key and the letter key can move cursor quite well,but I'm >wondering why not just use arrow key?so I think there's now arrow key in the old >keyboard and the old vi have *NO* choice but use letter key to move cursor?who can >give me a picture of the oldest

Re: public_html pages stoped serving [fixed]

2002-05-25 Thread Greg Wright
*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 25/05/2002 at 9:50 AM Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] [gregausit/redhat-list] wrote: >Hi Greg: > >I found the problem. Somehow the permissions on my password file got >changed. Must have been related to the filesystem filling up. Fixing that >fixed the use

Re: why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor???

2002-05-25 Thread Huter.Liu
hi,Vidiot! I know the arrow key and the letter key can move cursor quite well,but I'm wondering why not just use arrow key?so I think there's now arrow key in the old keyboard and the old vi have *NO* choice but use letter key to move cursor?who can give me a picture of the oldest keyb

Bad rpmdb, where'd this come from?

2002-05-25 Thread Harry Putnam
Running 7.1 and seems to have been running ok for quite a while. Today running up2date -u as I do every so often I got a few updates. imap, imlib, and fetchmail and sharutils. I realized I had no need for imap so just rpm -e'd those instead of installing the new ones. When I did I got this mess

Re: difference between run levels 1 and S

2002-05-25 Thread Statux
I think we figured all of this out already. Runlevel 1 is a defined runlevel (/etc/inittab) who's behavior is based on the related rc.d scripts (Runlevel 1 could therefore spam the screen with ascii art and do nothing more). Runlevel S, obviously, is what one would use if you were just going to g

Re: Console font lines per screen

2002-05-25 Thread Edward Marczak
On 5/22/02 11:32 PM, "Kevin Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 22 May 2002 14:09:52 -0400, you wrote: > >> I tried consolechars also, without success. The SYSFONT line in i18n seems >> to be what did it for me. And yes, I needed a reboot. > > Yes, it's a combination of the vga mode a

Re: why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor???

2002-05-25 Thread Jonathan Bartlett
On Sun, 26 May 2002, Huter.Liu wrote: > hi,redhat-list! > I'm wondering why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor but use h,j,k,l???Is >the oldest keyborad have no arrow key??The arrow key,home key,and the additional >number keys is added later,isn't it?? The arrow keys work fine for me.

Re: why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor???

2002-05-25 Thread Vidiot
>hi,redhat-list! > I'm wondering why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor but use h,j,k,l???Is >the oldest keyborad have no arrow key??The arrow key,home key,and the additional >number keys is added later,isn't it?? Strange, the arrow keys work for me. MB -- e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor???

2002-05-25 Thread Huter.Liu
hi,redhat-list! I'm wondering why vi don't use arrow key to move cursor but use h,j,k,l???Is the oldest keyborad have no arrow key??The arrow key,home key,and the additional number keys is added later,isn't it?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-05-26 ___

Re: Intel AnyPoint Wireless Network in Linux?

2002-05-25 Thread The Gyzmo
--- Steve Buehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You might want to go to intel.com and look at the > specs for the card to see > if it supports linux and if it does, check to see if > you have to download > drivers and/or what versions of linux all ready > support it built in. You > will probab

Re: Archived snapshot of 6.1?

2002-05-25 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 07:41:04PM -0300, Chris Watt wrote: > > Redhat has every (non-beta) version they've released on their ftp site > ftp.redhat.com, but it's a little busy most of the time. More specifically: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/6.1/en/iso/i386/redhat-6.1-i386.iso Good luc

Re: Archived snapshot of 6.1?

2002-05-25 Thread Chris Watt
At 13:18 2002/05/24 -0700, Paul Thomas wrote: >Does anyone know if there is a distro snapshot archived >someplace? Redhat has every (non-beta) version they've released on their ftp site ftp.redhat.com, but it's a little busy most of the time. -- Q: What's tiny and yellow and very, very, d

Re: difference between run levels 1 and S

2002-05-25 Thread Bret Hughes
On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 15:15, rpjday wrote: > > a number of people i've chatted with lately seemed to think > there was not much difference between run level 1 and run levels > s or S. after i explained it a couple of times, it occurred to > me to make sure *i* understood it properly. > > as

Re: otto mp3 streaming server

2002-05-25 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 03:14:16AM +1000, Dan Horth wrote: > > any help or ideas as to how I can get my mp3 collection streaming > around the house would be great! Have you tried mod_mp3 ? http://media.tangent.org/ http://enigma.freshrpms.net/rpm.html?id=810 Emmanuel PS: Please wrap your line

Re: Kernel oops

2002-05-25 Thread Statux
Whenever I change any hardware, I like to recompile the kernel to make sure everything is peachy. Try recompiling the kernel and see what happens. On Fri, 24 May 2002, Ed Wilts wrote: > In the last week or so, I've been starting to get kernel errors. This is > with the latest 7.1 updates. Any

RE: difference between run levels 1 and S

2002-05-25 Thread Wagner, Joseph
It's my understanding that Linux 1 = Linux S -Original Message- From: rpjday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 3:16 PM To: redhat mailing list Subject: difference between run levels 1 and S a number of people i've chatted with lately seemed to think there was no

Re: Intel AnyPoint Wireless Network in Linux?

2002-05-25 Thread Steve Buehler
You might want to go to intel.com and look at the specs for the card to see if it supports linux and if it does, check to see if you have to download drivers and/or what versions of linux all ready support it built in. You will probably get an answer faster that way. Steve At 09:57 AM 5/25/2

difference between run levels 1 and S

2002-05-25 Thread rpjday
a number of people i've chatted with lately seemed to think there was not much difference between run level 1 and run levels s or S. after i explained it a couple of times, it occurred to me to make sure *i* understood it properly. as i understand it, run level 1 is similar to the other num

Re: RH 7.2 + icewm 1.0.9 => switching virtual desktops

2002-05-25 Thread Monte Milanuk
On Sat, 25 May 2002 01:03:30 -0500 ABrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You should probably join the icewm mailing list, or as a minimum, look > at the info provided on the homepage. > > Quickly, edit ~/.icewm/preferences and/or ~/.icewm/keys. If the keys > file doesn't exist you'll need to creat

otto mp3 streaming server

2002-05-25 Thread Dan Horth
Hi - I was wondering if anyone has successfully set up otto on a Redhat 7.2 server - I've tried and failed... the project sounds great but the instructions are a bit vague for my level of admin skills, and I haven't had a reply from the developers... http://www.cardhouse.com/otto/ I've followe

Intel AnyPoint Wireless Network in Linux?

2002-05-25 Thread The Gyzmo
Hello. A friend recently gave me two Intel AnyPoint PCMCIA cards to toy with and I got the USB based adapter also. They work very well in Winbloze and I'd like to use the PCMCIA cards for the two laptops in my house rather than Ethernet. Is the Intel AnyPoint system supported with Linux right no

Re: SCSI card RH 7.3

2002-05-25 Thread Mike Burger
The Adaptec 2940 series will work well. On Sat, 25 May 2002, Andrew Judge wrote: > Anyone have any suggestions for a good scsi card that will control a tape > drive (68 pin Seagate 20/40) on RH 7.3? I was thinking about a Adaptec > 19160, but am not sure about compatibility since it is a little

Re: blew away a gig

2002-05-25 Thread Kent Borg
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 12:01:02PM -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2002, daniel wrote: > > > ext3 unfortunately > > all the information i've found is for ext2 > > unrm won't even run with ext3 > > These are not explicitly ext3 tools ext2 and ext3 are very compatible. The differ

Re: blew away a gig

2002-05-25 Thread Matthew Saltzman
On Fri, 24 May 2002, daniel wrote: > ext3 unfortunately > all the information i've found is for ext2 > unrm won't even run with ext3 These are not explicitly ext3 tools, but I had some success with LDE (lde.sourceforge.net) and debugfs (e2undel.sourceforge.net/recovery-howto.html). A lot of pat

Re: public_html pages stoped serving [fixed]

2002-05-25 Thread Scott
Hi Greg: I found the problem. Somehow the permissions on my password file got changed. Must have been related to the filesystem filling up. Fixing that fixed the user pages. Oh well, at least I was prodded into updating Apache . Thanks very much as always for your help, Scott > >All of my "p

Re: public_html pages stoped serving

2002-05-25 Thread Greg Wright
*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 25/05/2002 at 8:26 AM Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] [gregausit/redhat-list] wrote: >Greetings (help, help!) > >Last night I had a root filesystem fill due to a log file growing too >large. >I have corected that and all is back to normal except: > >All of m

public_html pages stoped serving

2002-05-25 Thread Scott
Greetings (help, help!) Last night I had a root filesystem fill due to a log file growing too large. I have corected that and all is back to normal except: All of my "public_html" (i.e. http://www.mydomain.com/~jones) web pages stopped serving. My non-public_html pages and virtual domains are w

Re: What is correct way to load modules before file systems are mounted?

2002-05-25 Thread John P Verel
Thanks! On 05/25/02, 12:43:00AM -0500, ABrady wrote: > Here's mine in its entirety, USB and all. -- John P. Verel Living Proof That Low Tech Beats High Tech! ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinf

RE: running 7.2 and 7.3 side by side

2002-05-25 Thread rpjday
On 24 May 2002, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 13:07, Ward William E DLDN wrote: > > > > Benefits: > > > > One, single /var so ALL logs still show up; and nicely, > > during boot, it TELLS you what kernel you're booting to, > > so you can decipher. > > /var contains data that ma

Re: conversion to pdf

2002-05-25 Thread Ben Logan
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 10:10:23PM -0700, Hidong Kim wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to convert images to PDF. They're mostly JPEG images to > start. I convert them to PostScript in xv. When I do this, the > PostScript image comes out with huge white borders. The JPEG images > which are about 4"

Re: SCSI card RH 7.3

2002-05-25 Thread Rick van der Linde
On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 09:43, Andrew Judge wrote: > Anyone have any suggestions for a good scsi card that will control a tape > drive (68 pin Seagate 20/40) on RH 7.3? I was thinking about a Adaptec > 19160, but am not sure about compatibility since it is a little unclear on > the HCL. It uses th

Re: SCSI card RH 7.3

2002-05-25 Thread Darryl Harvey
try initio 9100UW.. They seem to work well. Rgds, Darryl At 07:43 PM 25/05/2002, you wrote: >Anyone have any suggestions for a good scsi card that will control a tape >drive (68 pin Seagate 20/40) on RH 7.3? I was thinking about a Adaptec >19160, but am not sure about compatibility since it i

SCSI card RH 7.3

2002-05-25 Thread Andrew Judge
Anyone have any suggestions for a good scsi card that will control a tape drive (68 pin Seagate 20/40) on RH 7.3? I was thinking about a Adaptec 19160, but am not sure about compatibility since it is a little unclear on the HCL. Best regards, Andrew Judge __