On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 08:02:16AM -0400, Edward Croft wrote:
> Well, then, if we are to look up the answers ourselves, and frankly the
> resources in a lot of cases are lacking, incomplete, etc., and we aren't
> welcomed here to ask questions, then what good is this list?
I think you misunderstoo
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 12:11:43PM -0400, Edward Croft wrote
> The point I was trying to make was that the incident that I initially
> spoke out on was when a list member returned to the list, said just
> that, and asked if there was any word on RH10. Now think about it for a
> moment, he hasn't be
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:29:37AM +0200, Jim Herrick wrote:
> Sounds like we need an FAQ!
The problem is, that - according to experience - those that are too
lazy to read the documentation or use Google/archives are too lazy to
read the FAQ as well, so it won't help as much as desired...
Nonethe
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 02:59:23AM +0200, R Sánchez wrote:
> I just felt something had to be said here. In the last few weeks I've seen a
> lot of really lousy answers, the most of them with the Red Hat 10/Fedora
> stuff, but there have been others. Every now and then someone new stops in
> to the
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:39:04PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have seen a reference on another mailing list that Red Hat has taken steps
> to ensure that outfits like Cheapbytes have a simple, legally unambiguous way
> to make copies available. So, there should be a CD or DVD based rele
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 03:08:34PM -0600, Bill Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 15:59, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> > $100.- ?!?!? Definitely not targeted at the home user, meethinks,
>
> Hence the name; "Professional Workstation" as opposed to "Home USer
> Deskto
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:18:42PM -0400, Eric Wood wrote:
> Basically I want search for key terms only after stripping the HTML from the
> message because many spammers split up words with fake html tags, ie
> viagra.
[...]
> Any ideas?
Why not use SpamAssassin, after teaching it a sufficient num
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 03:37:43AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Oct 2003 19:55:19 -0400, William J. Salvino wrote:
[...]
> > Will there be a new-release boxed Red Hat operating system priced at
> > $39.99 or less with or without support or printed materials?
>
> Different question:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 02:15:26PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
> BUY.COM now has the product online with a release date of 10/26/2003.
> Their price is $100.99. Don't forget that it includes a full year of
> RHN which by itself is $60.
>
> http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=20359120&loc=105&que
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:49:46PM -0500, Jeff Wimmer wrote:
[...]
> Gnome and KDE look
> SO amatureish and unprofessional. Even XFCE which looked a lot like CDE has
> started to look like Gnome. CDE is the most professional desktop I've seen
> on linux,
[...]
Ahem. You *are* aware that this is
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 01:31:48PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
[...]
> Effectively, the following lists that were introduced together
> with the original Red Hat Linux Project website:
>
> rhl-list
> rhl-devel-list
> rhl-beta-list
> rhl-docs-list
Thanks for the clarification. Learn som
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 02:10:56PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 02:15:05 +0200, T. Ribbrock wrote:
>
> > > > Is anyone else subscribing to the fedora list yet?
> > >
> > > Yes, because all subscribers of the rhl-* lists have been tra
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 04:40:27PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:30:11 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
>
> > Is anyone else subscribing to the fedora list yet?
>
> Yes, because all subscribers of the rhl-* lists have been transferred
> to the fedora-* lists. Effectively, the rh
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 08:18:39AM +1000, Ian Mortimer wrote:
>
> > > What options are left to the SOHO server user if not Fedora or SUSE?
>
> > How about Mandrake?
>
> On a server? Debian or FreeBSD are likely to be more stable.
Why not Mandrake on a server? I haven't used it for that (my o
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:27:23AM -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
[...]
> 1. You had the free package available for, well, free, and Red Hat
> did not provide automatic updates. However, you _could_ get those using
> other tools like yum, current, and apt-get. Fedora will still be free,
>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:09:06AM -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> What options are left to the SOHO server user if not Fedora or SUSE? I've
> never used anything except RH, but would like to start thinking about a fall
> back plan in case Fedora is too bleeding edge for my needs.
How about Mandrake?
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 10:18:17AM -0400, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
> This is really a seperate issue from your original question but
> it is pretty easy to map other keys. For instance:
>
> xmodmap -e "keycode 71 = KP_Up" -e "keycode 72 = KP_Down"
> xmodmap -e "keycode 73 = KP_Left" -e "keycode 73
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 08:45:28AM -0400, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
> If you're using Gnome you could use the keyboard-mouse provided
> by the accessibility features:
>
> run "gnome-accessibility-keyboard-properties" and enable both
> "Enable keyboard accessibility features" and "Enable Mouse Keys"
Hi all,
I have a laptop with a resolution of 800x480. I've set the virtual
resolution to 800x600. It all works just dandy, but I have one
question: Is there any way to scroll around the screen without having
to use the mouse?
Cheerio,
Thomas
--
==> RH List Archive: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 10:31:30AM +1000, Ian Mortimer wrote:
> They can be on the same disk. Likewise for LVM volumes. It's less efficient
> than a single large partition but it can save you the cost of repartitioning.
Cool, thanks (also to the others who responded!)!
> Other (better) ways
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 10:48:00PM -0400, Mario T. DeFazio wrote:
[...]
> but they all display this error when Netscape 7.1 starts:
>
>LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library
>/usr/java/j2re1.4.0/plugin/i386/ns610/libjavaplugin_oji140.so
>[/usr/java/j2re1.4.0/plugin/i386/ns610/
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:56:59PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> I guess what you are referring to is linear mode (see
> http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO-4.html#ss4.2).
Actually, I think LVM was what I had seen earlier - using RAID for
this is new to me... :-}
> The exam
Hi all,
I have RHL running on a Toshiba Libretto laptop and I have one little
problem: The Libretto needs an extra partition for hibernating. As I
have a 20GB drive in there, that partition has to be around the 8.4GB
border ("old" BIOS). Not a problem as such, but that way, the large
partition I w
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 04:22:58PM -0400, Mario T. DeFazio wrote:
>
> Just to let everyone know, I finally found a binary package combination
> that works for
> my up2date'd Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Intel) kernel 2.4.20-20.7:
>
> - Mozilla 1.3.1
> - Sun Java J2RE 1.4.0_04 (j2re-1_4_0_04-linux-i58
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:02:22AM -0400, James Moberg wrote:
[...]
> software. I have never upgraded Mozilla on my system. Currently I am
> running version 0.9.9. I would like to upgrade to version 1.4 but don't
> know if it's stable on this version of Linux. From what I read I have
> to up
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:00:53PM -0400, John Rehmert wrote:
> You might also want to look into RegisterFly (www.registerfly.com).
> They don't have any initial fees and they only charge $9 or so per
> year. I've been with them for 4+ years with no problems and I'm up
> to 59 domains at this poin
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:13:06PM -0400, Nick Kishfy wrote:
> Well you can't really get it from the RHN (at least not with via
> up2date). Basically as soon as you install a RedHat distro you have to
> manually download and install an update just to connect to RHN. That's
> fairly inconvenient and
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:51:30PM -0400, Mario T. DeFazio wrote:
[...]
> Unfortunately, the other plugin
> /usr/java/j2re1.4.2_01/plugin/i386/ns610/libjavaplugin_oji.so
> causes Netscape 7.1 to fail on startup:
>
> ws> netscape7 &
> INTERNAL ERROR on Browser End: No manager for initializing f
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 06:05:28PM -0400, Mario T. DeFazio wrote:
[...]
> When I restarted Netscape, I got the following message:
>
> LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library
> /usr/java/j2re1.4.2_01/plugin/i386/ns610-gcc32/libjavaplugin_oji.so
^
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:15:30AM +0200, Willem van der Walt<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have done what you want to do although it was not win 2000.
> You might get an io error at the end of dd but things should work fine.
> It should copy the hole thing as is and it should work.
> Just check xx
Hi all,
I'm pretty certain this has been asked before and I did find a few
things on Google, but I'd like to be sure to understand it fully...
I have two 20GB hard drives with the same geometry, the only
difference being that one of them is a more "silent" version.
In the end, I want to use the "
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:43:31PM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> I haven't yet found a free X server for windows for linux to forward to...
Shouldn't Cygwin work for this as well?
Cheerio,
Thomas
--
==> RH List Archive: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=redhat-list&r=1&w=2 <==
---
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:28:28AM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> Looking for personal recommendations on 50-pin SCSI controllers with
> internal connectors. This does not need to be a new-ish model or
> high-end, just needs to support an internal SCSI DDS-3 drive on Red Hat
> Linux 8.0.
Pretty much
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 10:29:43PM +1000, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 22:19, T. Ribbrock wrote:
>
> > Wrong question. The correct question is: Why on earth does he have a
> > 13+ line long signature, ignoring Netiquette?
[...]
> Dunno. But it's better
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 09:02:11PM -1000, Marc Adler wrote:
[...]
> How the hell do you make your sig file change every time it gets
> attached to a message?
Wrong question. The correct question is: Why on earth does he have a
13+ line long signature, ignoring Netiquette?
SCNR,
Thomas
--
==> RH
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 12:17:34PM -0700, Cliff Wells wrote:
[...]
> My concern is that people
> will advocate Linux as having a faster desktop and then when people try
> it (defaulting to GNOME, probably) they find this claim to seem false,
> they will doubt other claims made by advocates (securit
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 06:19:18PM -0400, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
> What program do people use for calendar/scheduler program ?
[...]
I started using "plan" recently, and so far, I'm very happy with it.
http://www.bitrot.de/plan.html
Cheerio,
Thomas
--
==> RH List Archive: http://marc.thea
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:25:31AM -0400, David Hart wrote:
> Any suggestions for RH9?
I made very good experiences with ClaraOCR:
http://www.claraocr.org
Admittedly, it has some stability problems at times, but it's has an
excellent learning algorithm. Have a look at the FAQ on the site above
f
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:46:32AM -0700, Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 00:44, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> > I disagree. I still run Linux machines with GUI on 64MB and 48MB and
> > the only Windows that could match the performance on those machines is
> > Win95 and lowe
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 03:41:42PM -0700, Cliff Wells wrote:
[...]
> > At one time we could boast that Linux could perform well on low-end
> > hardware but such is no longer the case. Linux Likes RAM! As does any
> > other OS out there.
>
> Sort of true. For a desktop, I think Linux is a bit
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:14:56PM +0100, Paula Fernandes wrote:
> Well, thanks gh, but for the moment I just have this one :(
>
> Do you think it is possible to configure has it was other scanner, like
> the 3500c? They are quite similar...
That question is best asked on the sane mailing list,
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 11:34:57AM -0400, Lorenzo Prince wrote:
[...]
> Yes, it can be clearly seen that SCO is actually using M$ windows
> and MS Outlook to send and receive email on tyeir workstations.
> Feel free to make whatever assumptions you wish based on this fact,
> as they are probably al
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 10:42:28PM -0400, John Aldrich wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> I'm running RedHat 9.0 (upraded from 8.0) and I have an Advansys ABP940U I'm
> trying to change for an Adaptec 2940U, due to some problems I'm having with
> my CDRW.
[...]
> Can someone please tell me
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 03:01:00PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
[...]
> > Then add every user that's supposed to build RPMs to "src". :-)
>
> That's a nice and quite simple setup as well. Too elaborate for my
> user pool though ;-) .
I have a user pool of, er, two. ;-)
> Did you neve
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 01:58:26PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Another simple way to do this is to just chown -R /usr/src to the user
> that builds the rpm's. Works like a charm.
I've done that in a slightly more refined way:
- make a new group called "src"
- chgrp -R src /usr/src/Re
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 04:03:56PM -0700, Samuel Flory wrote:
> Windowmaker is not present in newer versions of RH.
Which is rather annoying, but not a problem as such.
> Even in older
> versions of RH it has not been maintained in RH for a long time. The
> menus are 80% filled with program
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 02:27:03PM -0500, Stephen Smith wrote:
> I couldn't have said it better! Look at what the prices are for M$ software
> adn you don't see people running around complaining - they just go to the
> store and buy it!
Errr - no, most of them (home users anyway) just go to the n
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:58:55PM -0400, Vince Scimeca wrote:
> I have also pulled drives from one box and put them in others using RH
> 7.2 with no real issues. These were vastly different boxes with
> different boards, processors memory etc. For me, RH detected the
> changes in sound and video
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 10:49:38AM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> On Friday 11 July 2003 03:50, T. Ribbrock wrote this in an attempt to be
> witty and informative:
>
> > At work, I use Mozilla 1.4. So far, I haven't had any serious
> > problems with any pages, short
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 09:01:38PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
> I've done a lot of work with mozilla and netscape, but unfortunately, on
> Windows, nothing touches IE. Too many webmasters assume IE and won't
> work properly with anything else.
[...]
At work, I use Mozilla 1.4. So far, I haven't had a
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 06:28:54PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:15:56PM +0200, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> > Well, mutt works nicely with IMAP under cygwin... ;-)
>
> My wife and I have been married for just about 25 years, and if I want
> to live to see 26, I w
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 12:49:25PM -0500, Sadanapalli, Pradeep Kumar (MED, TCS) wrote:
> I am forced to use the kernel version 2.4.20-8 which comes with
> default installation of RedHat 9. Whereas the latest version of the
> kernel for RedHat 9 is 2.4.20-18.9 . But as clearcase 5.0 only
> supports
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 12:11:40PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
> I've tried a ton of Windows e-mail packages, and most really suck at
> imap. Eudora, surprisingly enough, is great at pop but sucks at imap.
[...]
Well, mutt works nicely with IMAP under cygwin... ;-)
Cheerio,
Thomas
--
==> RH List Ar
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 08:54:16PM +0200, Go, Jeffrey wrote:
> I have downloaded the RH 7.3 ISO image and will be copying this to CD..
> When installing, do I just boot it off CD and install?
Have a look at http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/
Red Hat provides the necessary documentation onl
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 06:05:34PM -0400, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
> > You are running Red Hat, so wouldn't it be more convient to get your
> > version of Mozilla 1.4 from Red Hat (Rawhide)?
>
> I am still runing RH 7.3. I am pretty sure if I install from RawHide package
> I'd get all kind of p
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 04:30:44PM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> T. Ribbrock wrote:
> >>
> >>Can't we just nuke them both?
> >
> >
> >MS I don't care. Sun I would miss.
>
> Why would you miss Sun? There is now an open source fork of Java i
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:39:58PM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=716&e=5&u=/ap/20030626/ap_on_bi_ge/microsoft_java
> >
> >
>
> Can't we just nuke them both?
MS I don't care. Sun I would miss.
Cheerio,
Thomas
--
==>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 02:45:48PM -0400, Javier Gostling wrote:
>
> RHL9 on a P2/300 with 384 MB at home. Running as mail server, desktop,
> multiuser (there is a laptop that runs remote X sessions to the "big"
> machine), web proxy, firewall. Not blazing fast, but it gets the job done.
RHL 7.3
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:15:23PM -0400, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> On 25-Jun-2003/11:49 -0700, "Bailo, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> >Any OSS projects to 're-invent' the wheel?
>
> Berlin (renamed to something else?).
It's now Fresco. http://www.fresco.org
HTH. HAND.
Thomas ;-)
--
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:40:22AM +0200, Cornelius Kölbel wrote:
> you could use xfce. It is _realy_ fast and looks nice and modern.
Modern? If it still looks like CDE (which it did when I tried it a
couple of weeks ago), it looks rather outdated in my eyes... ;-)
But that's a matter of personal
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:12:41PM +0200, Manuel Aróstegui Ramirez wrote:
> I use Window Maker, for my is the best one, it is so
> fast, what about RAM...? for wm RAM is not a
> problem...;-)
Right. Also, Window Maker is extremely easy to configure and there are
tons of themes available for it...
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 07:21:42PM +0300, Panos Platon Tsapralis wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 17:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:18:31PM +0300, Panos Platon Tsapralis wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 12:16, Peter Peltonen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Instead of 50 workstati
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:13:42PM -0500, Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) wrote:
[...]
> My question is, which WM will do best job (and will be fastest) to do this:
> Desktop would just be with a graphic background (company name in the
> background), there would be only several icons on the desktop t
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:28:59PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
> One of the key differences between IIS and Apache is the way the web
> server is started.
[...]
> On Linux, however, the web server almost always run under a non-privileged
> account. If Apache is penetrated, the worst the attacker can do
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:09:31AM -0700, Bailo, John wrote:
> With all the alternatives in Linux, are there alternatives to X itself?
There is one project I know of: "The Berlin Consortium", which apperently
started over and is now called "Fresco". See: http://www.fresco.org/
It is under acti
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 04:50:58PM -0700, Lazor, Ed wrote:
> ? Are you talking about threading in terms of how the application
> divides into seperate processes? Or, are you talking about thread
> in the sense of the application organizing a group of common
> messages, based on subject?
I'm talk
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:38:10PM -0400, MWafkowski wrote:
> I'll try to distill my point. At this time there is no full blown GUI
> (functonality, eye candy, ease of use, etc.) that is not a pig on Linux.
In this form, the argument is wrong. There's Window Maker, which
offers all the functionali
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 09:55:46PM +0100, MKlinke wrote:
[...]
> Your note leads me to the conclusion that you believe OE doesn't support
> threads, it does...
*Real* threading or just threading by subject?
Cheerio,
Thomas
--
==> RH List Archive: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=redhat-list&r=1
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:03:10PM -0700, Jonathan Bartlett wrote:
> I could be wrong, but I thought mutt was available through cygwin.
Yes, it is - I'm using it (and Cygwin) daily (only way to stand
Win00). There's only one catch: The related Exchange server will have
to have been set up to suppo
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 01:44:04PM -0400, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
[...]
> For example, Mac OS X uses X, but the Aqua Window Manger/Desktop
> Environment is very fast, so the whole thing is fast.
Er... to the best of my knowledge, Mac OS X is *not* using X. Apple
designed their own GUI setup, fro
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 06:35:31PM -0600, Ryan McDougall wrote:
[...]
> Download some new themes from kdelook and try removing redhat-artwork.
> Otherwise Im not sure how to help.
I was under the impession that RH actuakky *patched* KDE and Qt, hence,
a simple themechange wouldn't fully get rid of
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 05:38:38PM -0400, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
> I am working to recover a server that's been hacked. The chkrootkit
> tool shows that some binary (eg 'ls', 'ps', 'top') has been changed
> (infected) by the hacker.
[...]
> So, basically my question is, how do I remove those f
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 01:12:08PM -0400, Michael Kalus wrote:
> I only know in SuSE but there is a theme in KDE called "Redmond" which is to
> my knowledge the closest you get to the "Windows Eperience" (No BSDs
> included though) ;)
Yeah, including a BSD would indeed be rather silly, unless you
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 01:52:13AM -0500, Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) wrote:
> I am migrating my workstations to RH9 from WindowsME and 98SE.
> So... I intalled RH9.0 and all the workstations are so much slower,
> all of the stuff is so much slower. Workstations are mostly Dells
> with about 900M
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:16:15PM -0700, Samuel Flory wrote:
> Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
>
> >
> >One could always get an email client with spam filtering capabilities
> >built in (like Mozilla)
> >
> It just takes a while teach mozilla that all of your mailing lists
> aren't spam;-)
The other
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:03:19PM -0400, Matthew Galgoci wrote:
> I've removed [EMAIL PROTECTED] because I think using such a service on a
> list is about the most obnoxious thing I've seen in a long time.
>
> Please send reports to the redhat-list-admin email address, I only check
> the list ab
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 08:42:08AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 00:21 19 Jun 2003, T. Ribbrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> | I wonder, is there a way for the list software to recognize and
> | unsubscribe such folks?
>
> No, because the report goes direc
Just got another one of those "SpamBlock: Please register to be
allowed to send mail to me" mails - this is just plain stupid! Running
list mail via such a mail address is rude at the least, IMO.
Anyway, apparently [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not want to receive
any mail from this list, hence, I sugges
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:02:08AM -0500, Ronald W. Heiby wrote:
> Wednesday, June 18, 2003, 2:10:04 AM, T. wrote:
> > Huh? No, the question is: Why the fsck where those guys able to get on
> > board with the BOX CUTTERS?!?!
>
> Because no one had thought of box cutters as a threat.
That's exactl
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:47:28PM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> Bret Hughes wrote:
>
> >It is analogous to spending 30 minutes in a security line at an airport
> >and having to check your pocket knife because of the terrorist activity
> >in our current environment.
> >
> >Bret
> >
> >
>
> S
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 06:43:56PM -0400, Ben Russo wrote:
[...]
> poster, X is SLOW SLOW SLOW and the GUI's are nowhere near as
> smooth and clean looking.
The latter is clearly a matter of personal preference. To me, for
example, a nicely set-up Window Maker screen is miles ahead of the
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 06:48:34PM -0400, Ben Russo wrote:
> Windows XP has virtual desktops (not as fully customizable as most
> X-window managers, but good enough).
So, after about 15-20 years, Windows has finally caught up in
usability? >;-)
> You have to get the Microsoft XP power toy for mu
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 03:18:39PM -0400, AragonX wrote:
[...]
> Now here is where we see eye to eye. Somewhat...
>
> X has been disappointing to me. I still have to use Windows because I
> can't get my games on X.
[...]
Well, it all depends on what you're doing with your machine(s). In my
eyes
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 06:39:53AM -0700, Richard S. Crawford wrote:
> I can't think of any Linux jokes to send on to him... maybe it's
> just too early in the morning. Can anyone else think of any that I
> can send on to him?
Well, maybe he could use BOFH as an inspiring source... Should be
pos
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 07:54:08AM -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> Is there a Unix utility that understands how to unpack MS-TNEF mail
> attachments?
There is and I have used it in the past, but I can't remember its
name - apparently, I've deleted it during the last upgrade...
Have you tried Goog
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 10:42:12PM -0500, Paul Sutcliffe wrote:
> What distribution works well with old computers? like a pentiumMMX
> 233MHz
I have RH 7.3 running on my Toshiba Libretto (P166MMX, 64MB) as well
as on a HP "all-on-board" machine (P233MMX, 48MB). Both work amazingly
well, even with
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 06:24:09AM -0700, Richard S. Crawford wrote:
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
GREAT link, thanks!
If my sig wasn't already four lines, I'd add it as well... That link
should be displayed at a very prominent place in the new FAQ some
folks are working on
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:50:02AM +0800, Redhat71 wrote:
> > Nguyen, David M wrote:
> >> My machine does not have xinetd installed. Where can I get a download
> >> and how to install it?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> David
> >>
> >>
> > Do a google on 'xinetd'
>
> suggesting others to use google is a g
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 12:31:08PM -0700, Patrick Nelson wrote:
> I copied the following directory from
>
> /lib/modules/2.4.18-27.7.x/pcmcia
>
> to
>
> /lib/modules/2.4.20-13.7/pcmcia
Have a look at Bugzilla - this has already been filed several times
and apparently, there are also workaro
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 10:32:29PM +0800, Redhat71 wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 07:04:54PM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote:
> > [...]
Please get your attributions right, the part below was written by
me...
> > Just to clarify it (I've never used up2date): You *do* need a RHN
> > subscription for up2d
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 07:04:54PM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 07:56:50PM -0500, fred smith wrote:
> > I've been trying since Monday to get into up2date and get nothing but
> > "Demo service currently disabled due to high load." I've even written
> > a shellscript that retries
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:15:01PM -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
[...]
> If you must have 2.95.3 (or any version of the compiler that doesn't come
> as an RPM *designed to live peacefully with the stock comiler*), the best
> strategy is to grab the tarballs from gcc.gnu.org and install them in
> /
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 04:13:35PM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 15:15, T. Ribbrock wrote:
[...]
> > As I said, basically all SRPMs from RH I've seen so far contain
> > RH-patches. Those patches need to be developped, tested and
> > maintained. That&
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:26:27AM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
> The things you see in the RH kernel are typically backports of features
> from the development kernel. Yes, it does make the RH kernel different,
> but not terribly special. Obviously, RH has developers (Alan Cox comes
> to mind), but
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 04:24:55PM -0500, Jeff Kinz wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:08:13PM +0200, T. Ribbrock wrote:
[...]
> > good releases, some even excellent at the time). The fact that RH is
> > keeping quiet about their intentions in this regard doesn't help,
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:15:59AM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
[...]
> Yes, wxPython! ;-) But then they'd get into the same quandry they've
> gotten into with Python. They insist on naming it 'python' and then
> resting a bunch of dependencies on top of the version number, which
> makes it difficul
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:02:31AM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
[...]
> explicitly allows for GPL'd software to be sold. But "free speech"
> definitely implies that it can't be "bootlegged", even if it is sold
> otherwise.
[...]
Point well taken. Of course you're right. However, my main concern is
t
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:44:17AM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
[...]
> It isn't clear to me how RedHat releasing newer versions of software
> faster is going to make much difference. RedHat doesn't write 99% of
> the software in RH Linux. What's the difference between the user
> installing the late
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 12:37:53AM -0700, Ryan McDougall wrote:
> Please provide to me the source of your assertion that there will be no
> more point releases, because I have seen no such statement by Redhat.
They're not saying it with so many words, but this makes me wary:
In the past, Red Hat
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:36:47PM -0800, Eric Brophy wrote:
[...]
> Maybe I missed something but I thought that Linux was "free". How can you
> boot-leg something with no price? Maybe I missed something.
BZZT! Thanks for playing, better luck next time! ;-)
The 'no price' thingy is the most
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
