On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 09:58, Ed Wilts wrote:
> There have been a few questions surrounding the RHCE life cycle and how
> it relates to Fedora and RHEL. Here's the response I received from Red
> Hat:
>
> "The RHCE life cycle will be bound to RHEL (making cert currency
> >Could mean a move to debian or freebsd for servers.
>
> Why? Personally, I see Fedora as being functionally equivalent to RHL 10,
> and for small servers I would have run 10 without question. No reason on
> Earth for me not to use Fedora for those, since I expect to see RH put as
> much int
Sounds like SuSE will be used more in the future.
:-( Bob
Gerry Doris wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
At 17:37 9/22/2003, you wrote:
On the other hand (from a University on a tight budget) I don't fancy forking
out for large numbers of RHEL licenses and I'm not sure about r
There have been a few questions surrounding the RHCE life cycle and how
it relates to Fedora and RHEL. Here's the response I received from Red
Hat:
"The RHCE life cycle will be bound to RHEL (making cert currency 5-7
yrs). All training will be rolled over to RHEL 3 base this fall.&quo
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 00:22:05 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote
> At 17:37 9/22/2003, you wrote:
> >On the other hand (from a University on a tight budget) I don't fancy forking
> >out for large numbers of RHEL licenses and I'm not sure about running vital
> >services on Fedora.
> >
> >Could mean a move
At 00:50 9/23/2003, you wrote:
I don't believe that Redhat will be putting any testing and quality
control into this new Fedora version.
I don't expect them to do that, since this would alienate a huge part of
their community which in some way does generate "leads" for later RHEL
sales. I don't t
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> At 17:37 9/22/2003, you wrote:
> >On the other hand (from a University on a tight budget) I don't fancy forking
> >out for large numbers of RHEL licenses and I'm not sure about running vital
> >services on Fedora.
> >
> >Could mean a move to debian or
Does this mean Red Hat is no longer putting ot their own OS?
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 02:22 am, you wrote:
> At 17:37 9/22/2003, you wrote:
> >On the other hand (from a University on a tight budget) I don't fancy
> > forking out for large numbers of RHEL licenses and I'm not sure about
> > ru
At 17:37 9/22/2003, you wrote:
On the other hand (from a University on a tight budget) I don't fancy forking
out for large numbers of RHEL licenses and I'm not sure about running vital
services on Fedora.
Could mean a move to debian or freebsd for servers.
Why? Personally, I see Fedora as being fun
> Thanks for digging that up. I'm not sure whether to consider it good
> news or bad- with all their changes, I've lost track. :-P
I consider it both good and bad.
Currently it's a lot of work building rpms for all the stuff we need that's
not bundled with RedHat (or is out of date). Fedo
press
> > release that signalled the end of the "retail" version.
> >
> > Previously, my certification was due to expire around RH 12. I have no
> > idea now.
>
> According to https://www.redhat.com/training/rhce/rhce_faq.html#current
>
>
>All
il" version.
>
> Previously, my certification was due to expire around RH 12. I have no
> idea now.
According to https://www.redhat.com/training/rhce/rhce_faq.html#current
All RHCEs earned on Red Hat Linux 7.3 or prior will be considered current
until the release of Red Hat
see http://rhce2b.com/
Regards,
Vitaly Karasik, RHCE
***
Information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual
or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 09:30, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> I'm getting ready to start studying for RHCE myself, and am about to pick up
> the RHCE Red Hat Certification Engineer Linux Study Guide
> (http://www.bookpool.com/.x/ezz9dsejf4/sm/0072224851). Do you have nay
> recomm
> On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 09:06, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> >
> > > Removed my resolv.conf file off of Linux Box.
> >
> > I have no idea why you would do that. Anybody else know?
>
> He's prepping for the troubleshootin
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 10:47, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> In another thread, Jason Dixon mentioned:
>
> > Well, I could. But you can't afford me. :)
>
> That got me to wondering...
>
> Jason, did you see a definite change in your income when you got the RHCE?
Yes
In another thread, Jason Dixon mentioned:
> Well, I could. But you can't afford me. :)
That got me to wondering...
Jason, did you see a definite change in your income when you got the RHCE?
I've been studying for the LPI Linux certification
(http://www.lpi.org/en/lpic.
- Original Message -
From: "santosh kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 6:50 PM
Subject: RE: [OffTopic?]RHCE Exam Preparation
> Hi komal,
>
> I too interested in writing the redhat 8.0 exam, please provide me th
MAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of komal
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 6:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OffTopic?]RHCE Exam Preparation
- Original Message -
From: "Sadanapalli, Pradeep Kumar (MED, TCS)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, Jul
- Original Message -
From: "Sadanapalli, Pradeep Kumar (MED, TCS)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 9:45 AM
Subject: [OffTopic?]RHCE Exam Preparation
> Can someone suggest any good books, URLs, any other sources that are
&g
Can someone suggest any good books, URLs, any other sources that are
really good for RHCE exam preparation? Also about CompTIA Linux+
exam..??
Any useful information is appreciated...
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat
I would like to take up RHCE exam. I was unable to decide which books to read, as most
of them are
not uptodate. I have around 4 years of experience with RedHat linux systems . Can
someone suggest me
good books, good sources of information for this, any links, the best way to prepare
for it
Mark Hutchinson wrote:
They changed to policy on this yesterday. The 2 major number versions now comes
from Advanced server numbering. As this is much slower, your RHCE will last
alot longer.
Which is even better news for those of us who were certed in the 6.2-7.2
days:
From the email I
my table and takes care of my kids. This means
that
> I have to ditch the past seven months of mucking around with RH 8.0
and
> the likes and start all over again - which is literally money spent.
I believe that you are mistaking Red Hat Certs for Microsoft
Certifications. I believe
Ya did see this right?
http://www.redhat.com/training/rhce/rhce_faq.html
For how long will my RHCE certification be considered current?
The validity period for all RHCEs and RHCTs is now officially pegged to
the release of the Enterprise product commercially available at the time
certification
They changed to policy on this yesterday. The 2 major number versions now comes
from Advanced server numbering. As this is much slower, your RHCE will last
alot longer.
Mark
Quoting Joe Polk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The whole idea of outdating RHCE's at this time is stupid
something but I don't think so. The bulk of Linux in general is the
same. It's not nearly the difference between Netware 3.12 and 4.11 or NT
and 2000. And for the price paid, If I had my RHCE for say 7.3, I'd
consider myself certified to any employer until after RH9.
<>
On W
u need a
certificate: to convince people you aren't.
Sorry to be so blunt, but I get tired of hearing complaints about a
digit and bringing emotional appeals into it makes it even more
unpalatable. The only valid complaint I've seen so far has to do with
possible issues about someone&#
m, but
as soon as I see a "RH 2003" which is upgraded by "RH XP" I'm jumping
ship.
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Seyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 5:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RHCE certifications and how current t
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Peter van der Does wrote:
OK,
So here I am, a RHCE 8 exam coming up next week and the weekend after
that RHCE 9 is in the stores. Should I do it or wait for the RHCE 9
Exam.
this close to the exam, do you even have the option of rescheduling
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 02:52:39PM -0600, Rigler, Steve wrote:
>
> MS's version numbering system is so screwed it doesn't even deserve
> mention (am I a version number, a year or a 2 letter buzz-phrase?).
To their credit, I think Microsoft had a good idea when they started
using the year instead o
ks like we'll be seeing RH 11 at about this time next
> year...
Word I saw was that it will be a 12 month cycle. Seems to be an
accomodation of the 1/3rd of peole who complain RH is to outdated, 1/3rd
that complain it is released too fast, and 1/2 of people that complain
it is too outdated A
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 02:48:00PM -0500, Ezra Nugroho wrote:
> I don't think that the integer only numbering is to confuse people.
> It's to eliminate the .0 versions that people dislike so much.
Yup - so, from now on, they'll *only* be releasing x.0 versions...
>;-)
Cheerio,
Thomas
--
==> RH
Ed Wilts wrote:
And I suppose the whole world is confused by Microsoft's integer
numbering too?
Almost the whole world are sheep for Microsoft, so that moot.
The US consumer market currently understands integer numbering. After
all, you grew up with integers long before you realized that there w
-
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RHCE certifications and how current they are - answer below
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:25:49PM -0600, Rigler, Steve wrote:
> "Starting with Red Hat Linux 9 the numbering
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:25:49PM -0600, Rigler, Steve wrote:
> "Starting with Red Hat Linux 9 the numbering system for
> the consumer release will be stated only as an integer."
>
> So RH is trying to confuse everybody the same way Sun did with the Solaris
> version numbers.
And I suppose the
gt; version numbers.
Yes, I'm sure the folks at RH all sat around and said "Hey, I know, how
about we do what Sun did with solaris and confuse everyone, that'll be
productive!"
Oops, did I forget the sarcasm tag? ;^)
--
Bill Anderson
RHCE #807302597505773
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RHCE certifications and how current they are - answer below
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 07:21:09AM -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
> >>Its not the version number that people care about...the RHCE cert is based
> &g
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 07:21:09AM -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
> >>Its not the version number that people care about...the RHCE cert is based
> >>on version numbers. So the big jump in version numbers makes the cert
> >>worthless a lot faster!
>
>
> Those
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Peter van der Does wrote:
> OK,
> So here I am, a RHCE 8 exam coming up next week and the weekend after
> that RHCE 9 is in the stores. Should I do it or wait for the RHCE 9
> Exam.
this close to the exam, do you even have the option of rescheduling?
rday
OK,
So here I am, a RHCE 8 exam coming up next week and the weekend after that RHCE 9 is
in the stores.
Should I do it or wait for the RHCE 9 Exam.
Darn upgrades and darn HTML settings
Peter
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com
Wait.
Original Message Follows
From: "Peter van der Does" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RHCE Exam, doing it now or wait.
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 07:51:23 +0100
OK,
So here I am, a RHCE 8 exam coming up nex
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 23:51, Peter van der Does wrote:
> OK,
>
> So here I am, a RHCE 8 exam coming up next week and the weekend after
> that RHCE 9 is in the stores.
> Should I do it or wait for the RHCE 9 Exam.
First, "upgrade" your email client to not send HTML. :
OK,
So here I am, a RHCE 8 exam coming up next week and the
weekend after that RHCE 9 is in the stores.
Should I do it or wait for the RHCE 9 Exam.
Darn upgrades.
Peter
he new number scheme will mean their
> certifications age out earlier. It won't. Modified policies will be
> forthcoming on the RHCE FAQs.
>
> Questions/inquiries should be directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> Hope this helps a little.
Thank you, Nate, this is helpful.
Oh I understand completely.
<>
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 18:39, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 10:30, Joe Polk wrote:
> > We are a sensitive lot, no? :)
> >
> > <>
> >
>
> I'm sensitive mostly because this stuff affects my business - which puts
> bread and butter on my table and tak
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 17:36, Rick Johnson wrote:
>
>
> Joe Polk wrote:
> > We are a sensitive lot, no? :)
>
> You might be too if you spent $2500 less than a year ago for
> certification and coursework that had the potential of lasting less than
> 1.5 years.
>
> -Rick
Better than spending
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 10:30, Joe Polk wrote:
> We are a sensitive lot, no? :)
>
> <>
>
I'm sensitive mostly because this stuff affects my business - which puts
bread and butter on my table and takes care of my kids. This means that
I have to ditch the past seven months of mucking around with R
Joe Polk wrote:
We are a sensitive lot, no? :)
You might be too if you spent $2500 less than a year ago for
certification and coursework that had the potential of lasting less than
1.5 years.
-Rick
--
Rick Johnson, RHCE #807302311706007 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux/Network Administrator
earning Services (used with permission):
> >
> > "RHCEs should not worry that the new number scheme will mean their
> > certifications age out earlier. It won't. Modified policies will be
> > forthcoming on the RHCE FAQs.
> >
> > Questions/inquiries s
e out earlier. It won't. Modified policies will be
forthcoming on the RHCE FAQs.
Questions/inquiries should be directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hope this helps a little.
This is reassuring, and was my only qualm on the modified numbering.
Looking forward to the modified policy verbiage.
won't. Modified policies will be
forthcoming on the RHCE FAQs.
Questions/inquiries should be directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hope this helps a little.
--
Nate Golnik
Red Hat System Administrator
1801 Varsity Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
David Busby wrote:
that counts. My resume tip: demonstrate increasing skills and
responsibility -- that shows you are motivated and can educate yourself.
i think david has pointed to the best advice that anyone
could give during an interview! thank goodness i'm in
management also : ), otherwise
That's the answer I was looking for.
<>
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 13:59, Paul Greene wrote:
> If a clearance is required before you start, you're out of luck. To
> apply for a clearance in the first place, if you didn't already have a
> clearance from being in the military or something, your emplo
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Joe Polk
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RHCE looking for a job
I see a lot of jobs, even here in GA, that require "clearance" and
wondered how it might be obtain
If a clearance is required before you start, you're out of luck. To
apply for a clearance in the first place, if you didn't already have a
clearance from being in the military or something, your employer has to
fill out a form stating the need for you to have a clearance, and give a
specific co
L PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Joe Polk
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RHCE looking for a job
I see a lot of jobs, even here in GA, that require "clearance" and
wondered how it might be obtained.
<>
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 10
I see a lot of jobs, even here in GA, that require "clearance" and
wondered how it might be obtained.
<>
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 10:19, Paul Greene wrote:
> Immediates clearances are only needed if you work for DoD or an
> intelligence agency. If you get hired by someone who's clients are
> mainl
O its all experience
that counts. My resume tip: demonstrate increasing skills and
responsibility -- that shows you are motivated and can educate yourself.
/B
- Original Message -
From: "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003
Immediates clearances are only needed if you work for DoD or an
intelligence agency. If you get hired by someone who's clients are
mainly civilian agencies, you don't need a clearance. Actually the first
time I got hired in this area was for a DoD client, and I didn't have a
clearance either. I
Most such jobs require clearance. How would one obtain clearance ahead
of applying for a job with the gub'munt?
<>
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 09:09, Paul Greene wrote:
> The Washington DC/ Northern Virginia area, while not exactly booming
> with IT jobs, is probably in better shape than most of the r
The Washington DC/ Northern Virginia area, while not exactly booming
with IT jobs, is probably in better shape than most of the rest of the
country.
The main reason is the Federal government. Working for government
contractors doesn't pay as much as what you'd be used to in the
commercial worl
Sorry to be off topic here, but I have some HR
experience here...how geek is that?
I used to work in HR for a very large transportation
company before I was laid off too, but what the deal
is with this that there is no money allocated for
relocating folks from outside the area...So that is
why
o: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RHCE looking for a job
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 08:02:59AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> What a terrible thing that there are young people, eager to work, with
> great qualifications who have "punched all the right buttons", yet can't
> e
sh Raj Sarraf
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Ric Tibbetts said:
>
> So far, I've never had to resort to using the phrase "Would you like fries
> with that?" in the course of my work day. But when you need to feed the
> family, don't get too picky when the market is like it is now.
I haven't either and won't for a while luckily. But even that
Ric Tibbetts said:
> Unfortunately, relocating isn't even always an option.
> I'm seeing more, and more statements like the following:
>
> ---
> Principals only. Candidates OUTSIDE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WILL NOT BE
> CONSIDERED IN THIS SEARCH.
>
> [Company name removed] is an Equal Opportunity Emp
the tech industry has taken a big hit. I just recently got
> > another job after 8 months of unemployment. If you're in the States,
> > you'll better your chances if you are willing to relocate to anywhere
> > that will offer you a job.
> >
> > Sergey Moto
> >
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 12:19:09PM -0600, John Nichel wrote:
> >
> >>Good luck. Unlike 2+ years ago, when the head-hunters were call us at
> >>work, the tech industry has taken a big hit. I just recently got
> >>another job a
nate wrote:
good luck to all those unemployed out there..!
nate
(unemployed and loving it..not!)
oh..and I'm in washington state. in MS's backyard, so close I can almost
spit on them(their HQ is 3 miles away). moved here in 3/2000 from california.
spit away : )
--
<>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
er your chances if you are willing to relocate to anywhere
that will offer you a job.
Sergey Motorny wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I am a 22-year-old RHCE with Bachelor's in Business Administration and
about to complete Master's in Computer Information Systems. I am fluent
in English/Russian
her job after 8 months of unemployment. If you're in the States,
> you'll better your chances if you are willing to relocate to anywhere
> that will offer you a job.
>
> Sergey Motorny wrote:
> >Hello Everyone,
> >
> >I am a 22-year-old RHCE with Bachelor'
John Nichel wrote:
Hey Rebecca, does the Mississippi Department of Enviromental Quality
have any 60k+/year openings for a Louisiana Linux geek? :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What a terrible thing that there are young people, eager to work, with
great qualifications who have "punched all the right
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ome.net> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: RHCE looking for a job
will offer you a job.
Sergey Motorny wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I am a 22-year-old RHCE with Bachelor's in Business Administration and
about to complete Master's in Computer Information Systems. I am fluent
in English/Russian, have a year of IT experience, and also hold Network+
and A+ ce
to find a new job (I was employed for
that time). I went on about 5 interviews. The job I have now _required_
an RHCE, and thus I landed it.
James S. Martin, RHCE
Contractor
Administrative Office of the United Sates Courts
Washington, DC
(202) 502-2394
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailt
od" at one time or another. You're just
> >> paying your dues early.)
> >>
> >> Rebecca R. King
> >> Lead System Administrator
> >> Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality
> >> State of Mississipp
I
IT Manager/Buyer
Impel Industries, Inc.
586-254-5800
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of christopher cuse
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RHCE looking for a job
Hello All,
I'm certified
Hello All,
I'm certified RHCE and CNNA and also looking for work. Located in France, I
can say that the market is brutal here and in Euroland -- the tech bubble
that burst long ago has now translated into lower earnings for tech
companies across the world and into responses from HR depart
rly.)
>>
>> Rebecca R. King
>> Lead System Administrator
>> Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality
>> State of Mississippi
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Ritesh Raj Sarraf
>>
>> <[EMAIL P
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ome.net> cc:
>
Sent by: Subject: Re: RHCE looking for a job
redhat-list-admin
it's very sorry to know.. but the reason behind it is that GNU/Linux requires
knowledge as its primary requisite, not certification..
ritesh
Quoting Sergey Motorny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I am a 22-year-old RHCE with Bachelor's in Business Admin
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 05:03:54PM -0800, nate wrote:
> I replied to the poster off-list ..but wanted to point out that
> certs in the UNIX/linux world are about worthless at the moment.
> I've been lookin for a job for 7 months, applied to about 70 positions,
> had about 20 interviews, came *rea
position on linux/unix systems.
But really, I don't know how it is in other parts of the country
but I see more jobs posted that require top secret clearance then
I see jobs asking for RHCE or even Solaris certifications. I may
of seen the RHCE mentioned less then half a dozen times over pr
n the next higher paying job.
As for the certs, having them can't hurt in the long run. Just don't
expect someone to hand you a job for it. That being said, though, I have
much more respect for an RHCE than an MCSE.
<>
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 19:35, Gene Yoo wrote:
> David Busby wr
David Busby wrote:
man resume
this is so wrong :) yes i have a smile on my face also... i
think in general, all job market is pretty bad right now. i
don't care how many certs you may have, the bottom line is
the job market is bloated. if the original poster is really
serious about finding a
Oh that was baaad! :)
<>'
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 18:50, David Busby wrote:
> man resume
> - Original Message -
> From: "Sergey Motorny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 15:45
> Subje
man resume
- Original Message -
From: "Sergey Motorny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 15:45
Subject: RHCE looking for a job
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I am a 22-year-old RHCE with Bachelor's in Business Adm
Hello Everyone,
I am a 22-year-old RHCE with Bachelor's in Business Administration and
about to complete Master's in Computer Information Systems. I am fluent
in English/Russian, have a year of IT experience, and also hold Network+
and A+ certifications. I have been looking for a Lin
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 13:31, Gordon wrote:
> >
> I took the RHCE exam in 2000 and passed it without taking any of the
> classes. I had been playing with linux and Redhat for several years.
> I'll be retaking it next month in Raleigh.
That's ho I did it. :^)
>
&g
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 15:45, Bret Hughes wrote:
> HOw bout scripts that will break a standard distro? be a lot easier to
> download.
Please, how about trimming unnecessary and duplicated text from your
replies? Be a lot easier to read.
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list ma
; >>
> > >>>I would have to agree with Robert here. The best way to study for the
> > >>>RHCE is just work with Red Hat Linux everyday and think of things to
> > >>>break and then fix them.
> > >>>
> > >>>I've bee
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 14:31, Gordon wrote:
> Bill Anderson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 09:43, Ted Gervais wrote:
> >
> >>On Monday 10 February 2003 10:03 am, Rechenberg, Andrew wrote:
> >>
> >>>I would have to agree with Robert here. The best way
Bill Anderson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 09:43, Ted Gervais wrote:
On Monday 10 February 2003 10:03 am, Rechenberg, Andrew wrote:
I would have to agree with Robert here. The best way to study for the
RHCE is just work with Red Hat Linux everyday and think of things to
break and then fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>Also, at the end of these classes you should be able to actually install >and use the
>system unlike Microsoft classes where at the end you can only >pass tests.
don't forget getting worthless pieces of paper too (toilet paper) ;)
- -- Jonath
esday, February 11, 2003 1:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RHCE
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Terry Hobart wrote:
> This class covers command line bash commands. No real linux administration
> was discussed. If you are good setting up scripts then you could skip the
> class. I had only rudi
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Terry Hobart wrote:
> This class covers command line bash commands. No real linux administration
> was discussed. If you are good setting up scripts then you could skip the
> class. I had only rudimentary script experience ( half deciphering How
> To's ). This class add a grea
AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: RHCE
Hi,
Go to your Linux System and work with it, work with all parts of the system,
that's all !
If you want study for the theoretical Part, read the course scripts and
related books about linux, or the best one work with your system !
Reg
a lot more code when I see it and
can travel around and manipulate the system better.
Terry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Ted Gervais
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 8:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RHCE
On Friday 07 February 200
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
