[Ooops, I didn't realize that this was CCed to sage-devel, so here is
my reply, slightly edited for public consumption]
William Stein wrote:
> Michael,
William
>
> I want to somehow start a very tentative *actual* step toward doing a
> native windows port. I installed
> Windows into vmware on
> > I want to somehow start a very tentative *actual* step toward doing a
> > native windows port. I installed
> > Windows into vmware on my laptop yesterday. I think the first thing
> > we need to do is decide whether
> > we're going to:
> > (1) build our own Python using mingw,
> > or (2
Abshoff:
> Do you got the statistics script for downloads of Sage? I checked my
> Sage mirror logs and it looks like I had about 100 binary downloads
> from 11/01-11/26 this month from sage.apcocoa.org alone.
Last week the stats on sagemath.org were:
Linux Binary
30
OS X Binary
11
Source
22
VMwar
On Nov 28, 4:46 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I want to somehow start a very tentative *actual* step toward doing a
> > > native windows port. I installed
> > > Windows into vmware on my laptop yesterday. I think the first thing
> > > we need to do is decide whether
> >
On Nov 28, 5:15 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Abshoff:
>
> > Do you got the statistics script for downloads of Sage? I checked my
> > Sage mirror logs and it looks like I had about 100 binary downloads
> > from 11/01-11/26 this month from sage.apcocoa.org alone.
>
> Last week
Ok, the statistics for sage.apcocoa.org over roughly 4 weeks, not 1
week like William's stats:
Linux Binary: 33
205, 205, 205, 205, 205, 205, at, be, be, ch, ch, com, com, de, de,
de, de, de, de, de, de, de, de, de, ie, it, net, net, net, net, pl,
uk, uk
OS X Binary: 10
205, at, at, de, de, de,
On Nov 29, 2007, at 4:48 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Ok, I started fleshing out the windows port page at
>
>http://wiki.sagemath.org/windows
>
> Please add content and/or comments, we need to get this going. A data
> point: Maxima 5.13 was downloaded about 40,000 times for Windows since
> the re
Ok, I started fleshing out the windows port page at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/windows
Please add content and/or comments, we need to get this going. A data
point: Maxima 5.13 was downloaded about 40,000 times for Windows since
the release in August while Linux downloads in that time frame are
On Nov 29, 11:10 pm, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2007, at 4:48 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> > Ok, I started fleshing out the windows port page at
>
> >http://wiki.sagemath.org/windows
>
> > Please add content and/or comments, we need to get this going. A data
> > poin
On Nov 30, 12:45 am, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2007, at 5:41 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> >> So, hypothetically speaking, if I wanted to help with windows
> >> development, what are my options for getting windows running on my
> >> macbook?
>
> > With bootcamp you can insta
On Nov 29, 2007, at 5:41 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>> So, hypothetically speaking, if I wanted to help with windows
>> development, what are my options for getting windows running on my
>> macbook?
>>
>
> With bootcamp you can install Windows in a separate partition. VMWare
> Fusion lets you virtualiz
On Nov 29, 2007 3:52 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > So I would need to upgrade to 10.5.x ($$), and buy a copy of windows
> > ($$), if I wanted to do this legally. That's quite a hurdle.
>
> Fusion & Parallels work on 10.4. Bootcamp is no longer available from
> Apple because it was released
On Jan 21, 5:42 pm, kcrisman wrote:
Hi,
> I had a long rationale for why I am interested in knowing the status
> of the Windows port, but upon reading it I realized the biggest reason
> is sheer curiosity, so I'll just ask. The relevant wiki pages and
> Google group don't give much inkling,
From: "mabshoff"
> That is why having an MSI installer that
> includes Cygwin is important at that stage since dropping a working
> Sage into a "foreign" Cygwin is assured with probability 1 to be
> broken in some aspect.
That will create problems though if Cygwin is already installed. There
s
On Jan 25, 8:26 am, "Alec Mihailovs" wrote:
> From: "mabshoff"
Hi,
> > That is why having an MSI installer that
> > includes Cygwin is important at that stage since dropping a working
> > Sage into a "foreign" Cygwin is assured with probability 1 to be
> > broken in some aspect.
>
> That wil
From: "mabshoff"
> There shouldn't be two cygwin.dlls on the same computer.
> No, this does not apply since first cygwin1.dll in %PATH% or CWD will
> be the one used if no DLL has been loaded into RAM. You cannot run two
> different Cygwin instances at the same time and expect them to work.
Th
> Is that September 2009? If we do not have something native on Windows
> then we are in deep trouble.
The technical discussion above was very interesting, as I know little
about Windows internals, and it sounds like tons of good work is going
on with supporting so many architectures. I probably
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 6:04 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> Is that September 2009? If we do not have something native on Windows
>> then we are in deep trouble.
>
> The technical discussion above was very interesting, as I know little
> about Windows internals, and it sounds like tons of good work is
On Jan 25, 8:53 am, "Alec Mihailovs" wrote:
> From: "mabshoff"
>
> > There shouldn't be two cygwin.dlls on the same computer.
> > No, this does not apply since first cygwin1.dll in %PATH% or CWD will
> > be the one used if no DLL has been loaded into RAM. You cannot run two
> > different Cygwi
On Jan 25, 6:04 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> > Is that September 2009? If we do not have something native on Windows
> > then we are in deep trouble.
>
> The technical discussion above was very interesting, as I know little
> about Windows internals, and it sounds like tons of good work is going
> on
> Just out of curiosity, what is so difficult about installing VMware +
> VMware Sage? Let me break this down into two questions:
>
> (1) What are some things that are difficult about installing VMware?
> This is a well-supported commercial product made by publicly traded
> company with an operat
I feel one fairly big problem with the VMware installation is the
sheer size of the binary to download. Other issues are performance;
running a Sage server in a VMware session is noticeable slower than
connecting to an on-line Linux version. Then there are some practical
problems such as accessing
Hi,
I just want to thank bsdz for responding, and emphasize that the point
of this thread is mainly to see what options there are to make the
VMware-sage experience much better, while we wait for the native
windows port. There are likely many "highly annoying" issues people
have with the vmware
I see what you mean by the download size. Perhaps another option might
be to offer the source code as a separate download if any is included.
> VMware Sage is likely mostly going
> to be faster than a native windows port, especially on modern
> processors.
I'm not too sure if this sounds correct
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:09 PM, bsdz wrote:
>
> I see what you mean by the download size. Perhaps another option might
> be to offer the source code as a separate download if any is included.
Almost no source code is included, except for the core sage library
(which isn't that much, especially
On Jan 26, 12:48 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
> > Other issues are performance;
> > running a Sage server in a VMware session is noticeable slower than
> > connecting to an on-line Linux version.
>
> For *raw computations* (cpu bound code, e.g., computing determinants,
> solving systems, e
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 5:36 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 26, 12:48 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>
>
>> > Other issues are performance;
>> > running a Sage server in a VMware session is noticeable slower than
>> > connecting to an on-line Linux version.
>>
>> For *raw computations* (
To use WinSCP start VMware Player session and login as "manage" user.
Switch to root user by typing "sudo su". Edit /etc/ssh/sshd_config and
ensure PermitRootLogin is set to "yes". Download WinSCP from
http://winscp.net/eng/download.php. Start WinSCP and use IP address of
VMware Player as Host nam
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:49 PM, bsdz wrote:
>
> To use WinSCP start VMware Player session and login as "manage" user.
> Switch to root user by typing "sudo su". Edit /etc/ssh/sshd_config and
> ensure PermitRootLogin is set to "yes". Download WinSCP from
> http://winscp.net/eng/download.php. Sta
Another alternative, for using Sage in class, instead of using a
(non-existing) native Windows port, or one of the virtualizations, is to use
it from a live CD, booting Linux. The CDs are easy to distribute in class,
and students don't have to download and install anything.
Alec
--~--~-
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Alec Mihailovs wrote:
>
> Another alternative, for using Sage in class, instead of using a
> (non-existing) native Windows port, or one of the virtualizations, is to use
> it from a live CD, booting Linux. The CDs are easy to distribute in class,
> and students d
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:32 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Alec Mihailovs wrote:
>>
>> Another alternative, for using Sage in class, instead of using a
>> (non-existing) native Windows port, or one of the virtualizations, is to use
>> it from a live CD, booting L
Em Dom, 2009-01-25 às 18:04 -0800, kcrisman escreveu:
>
> Will there be a sage.exe file (or something like that) that my
> students can download straight from sagemath.org and use right away on
> a Windows machine?
I believe this is the big point of the whole thread. Even though sage's
users cur
Errr Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you need WinSCP for, but this seems
overly complicated. All you have to do is start the VMware player Sage
image and enter "notebook" at the login screen. It will then give you an IP
address which you can use in WinSCP (or ssh to). username is "login"
pas
On Friday, August 11, 2017 at 9:28:59 AM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote:
>
> Earlier this week I finally had an opportunity to build a Windows
> release for Sage 8.0 (which would have preferably been done before the
> release announcement of 8.0 but things didn't work out
> timing/communication-wise).
Thanks you very much for this release I was waiting for it to see how sage
8 behaves on windows and linux
Best
Henri
Le vendredi 11 août 2017 10:28:59 UTC+2, Erik Bray a écrit :
>
> Earlier this week I finally had an opportunity to build a Windows
> release for Sage 8.0 (which would have prefera
If you need visual studio 2008, I have one, which is purchased by my
university. I think it would not be illegal to compile and distribute sage
for you with it. But remember, i am not a lawyer...AAP
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:00 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi Sage Devels, etc.
>
> I am getting v
On Feb 23, 3:31 am, ahmet alper parker wrote:
Hi,
> If you need visual studio 2008, I have one, which is purchased by my
> university.
The Sage project has several MSVC 2008 Professional licenses donated
by Microsoft Research for the port, so we are good. The point William
was trying to make
There is no need for a window$ server... don't waste your time in such
a
bad way... it is easy to use the wmplayer and the image that the sage
team
provides from the website.
Obviously don't be mad at me, that's just the way i see and therefore
take it
as a suggestion.
bye Rob.
ahmet alper par
On Feb 23, 3:37 am, Kenny wrote:
Hi Rob,
> There is no need for a window$ server... don't waste your time in such
> a
> bad way... it is easy to use the wmplayer and the image that the sage
> team
> provides from the website.
There are *plenty* of reasons to do a native port, not but limited
I think one of the main idea behind developing a real alternative for Magma,
Matlab, Mathematica etc. is their license costs and restrictions on altering
the source code etc. Personally, if I had chance to not to use windows, I
won't. Let me give an example, last night I read an article about backw
On Feb 23, 5:16 am, ahmet alper parker wrote:
Hi,
> I think one of the main idea behind developing a real alternative for Magma,
> Matlab, Mathematica etc. is their license costs and restrictions on altering
> the source code etc. Personally, if I had chance to not to use windows, I
> won't. Le
I will help with the Windows port.
Is it feasible to have the source code in SVN?
On Feb 23, 5:00 am, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage Devels, etc.
>
> I am getting very impatient about how slowly work on the Microsoft
> Windows Sage Project has been moving. Thus I've started a new project
> to
The article was:http://thebetaguy.com/exclusives/?postid=1029344029
I am not sure about it's technical correctness..
AAP
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:16 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 5:16 am, ahmet alper parker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I think one of the main idea behind developing a real altern
Just FYI, there is a miniscule typo on
http://wiki.sagemath.org/windows/msvc64-issues
insofar as it refers to the 32-bit port. Also,
http://wiki.sagemath.org/windows/timeline
probably should be updated e.g. with a cut-and-paste of some part of
the OP's first message in this thread. It sounds lik
On Feb 23, 7:41 am, ahmet alper parker wrote:
Hi,
> The article was:http://thebetaguy.com/exclusives/?postid=1029344029
> I am not sure about it's technical correctness..
> AAP
Thanks for the link. Note that the article was posted on "Thursday,
April 03, 2008" - I thought maybe it was two da
On Feb 23, 7:45 am, kcrisman wrote:
Hi,
> Just FYI, there is a miniscule typo
> onhttp://wiki.sagemath.org/windows/msvc64-issues
> insofar as it refers to the 32-bit port.
This is correct since for now we are doing 32 bits only, at least from
my end which is complementary to what William do
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:46 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> Anyway, that was a little less than a year ago and I have so far heard
> zero complaints about Windows 7 breaking the binary API of code. Given
> that the beta has been downloaded a couple million times from MS
> themselves as well as probably
On Feb 23, 6:26 am, Blair wrote:
> I will help with the Windows port.
>
> Is it feasible to have the source code in SVN?
Which source code specifically do you mean?
If things get checked in it won't be SVN, but HG. *Anything* but CVS
or SVN :)
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~---
On Feb 23, 7:52 am, Alfredo Portes wrote:
Hi Alfredo,
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:46 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> > Anyway, that was a little less than a year ago and I have so far heard
> > zero complaints about Windows 7 breaking the binary API of code. Given
> > that the beta has been downloade
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:38 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 23, 3:31 am, ahmet alper parker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> If you need visual studio 2008, I have one, which is purchased by my
>> university.
>
> The Sage project has several MSVC 2008 Professional licenses donated
> by Microsoft Research
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Blair wrote:
>
> I will help with the Windows port.
Thanks. What's your last name? I want to add it to the
windows.sagemath.org page. Also, please subscribe to the
sage-windows mailing list.
> Is it feasible to have the source code in SVN?
We'll likely use
The link to the windows binary seems light (64MB); which parts of
sage are included in it?
didier
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:00 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi Sage Devels, etc.
>
> I am getting very impatient about how slowly work on the Microsoft
> Windows Sage Project has been moving. Thus
I thought the complete windows port should be available via SCM.
I find working on downloaded source snapshots a bit too cumbersome.
Is there an advantage of using HG/Mercurial over SVN. Speed perhaps?
On Windows, TortoiseSVN is very popular among many open source
projects because of its tight i
My last name is Sutton and my trac id is bsutton.
I don't mind using Mercurial. I hope it has an interface similar to
Tortoise SVN. How long would it take to set up the repository with the
latest source snapshot from the Windows site?
On Feb 23, 4:44 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2
On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Blair wrote:
>
> My last name is Sutton and my trac id is bsutton.
>
> I don't mind using Mercurial. I hope it has an interface similar to
> Tortoise SVN. How long would it take to set up the repository with the
> latest source snapshot from the Windows site?
Blair
On Feb 23, 9:37 am, Tim Lahey wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Blair wrote:
>
>
>
> > My last name is Sutton and my trac id is bsutton.
>
> > I don't mind using Mercurial. I hope it has an interface similar to
> > Tortoise SVN. How long would it take to set up the repository with the
> >
TortoiseHg and 32 bit look like they fit the bill for me. Thanks.
On Feb 23, 5:45 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> On Feb 23, 9:37 am, Tim Lahey wrote:
>
> > On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Blair wrote:
>
> > > My last name is Sutton and my trac id is bsutton.
>
> > > I don't mind using Mercurial. I hope it
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:57 AM, didier deshommes wrote:
>
> The link to the windows binary seems light (64MB); which parts of
> sage are included in it?
cython, freetype, ipython, libpng, matplotlib, mercurial, moin, mpir,
networkx, numpy, pycrypto, pyreadline, python, pywin32, scons, sympy,
t
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Blair wrote:
>
> I thought the complete windows port should be available via SCM.
Yes of course that will be a shortterm goal. Otherwise collaboration
is difficult.
> I find working on downloaded source snapshots a bit too cumbersome.
>
> Is there an advantage
William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage Devels, etc.
[...]
>
> If you are interested in helping, see the web page, download the
> newest zip file and start hacking. If you have something useful to
> say, respond to this email and join the sage-windows mailing list.
>
Useful? I downloaded MSVC 2008 pro
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> Hi Sage Devels, etc.
>
> [...]
>>
>> If you are interested in helping, see the web page, download the
>> newest zip file and start hacking. If you have something useful to
>> say, respond to this email and join the s
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Here's something to try:
FYI, I compiled sage-windows-0-3 with the freeware Visual C++ 2008
Express Edition and it seems to work. At least both sympy and pylab
work.
Running sage results in the following (not much in dir()...?):
C:\source
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Fredrik Johansson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> Here's something to try:
>
> FYI, I compiled sage-windows-0-3 with the freeware Visual C++ 2008
> Express Edition and it seems to work. At least both sympy and pylab
>
William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>> William Stein wrote:
>>> Hi Sage Devels, etc.
>> [...]
>>> If you are interested in helping, see the web page, download the
>>> newest zip file and start hacking. If you have something useful to
>>> say, respond to thi
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Fredrik Johansson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> Here's something to try:
>
> FYI, I compiled sage-windows-0-3 with the freeware Visual C++ 2008
> Express Edition and it seems to work. At least both sympy and pylab
> work.
M
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Fredrik Johansson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> Here's something to try:
>
> FYI, I compiled sage-windows-0-3 with the freeware Visual C++ 2008
> Express Edition and it seems to work. At least both sympy and pylab
> work.
>
Fredrik Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> Here's something to try:
>
> FYI, I compiled sage-windows-0-3 with the freeware Visual C++ 2008
> Express Edition and it seems to work. At least both sympy and pylab
> work.
>
For me building with the express e
Currently, windows porting efforts are focusing on porting to Cygwin.
One of the targets for the Sage-5.0 release is a successful port to
Cygwin. Here is a page with some good info:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/CygwinPort
I am not involved in the project myself. Someone else with more
Hi !
Thank you for the detailed answer. It will help to find someone who
could work on the Windows port and I'm glad it seems reasonable to ask
a good undergraduated student in computer science to do the job, at
least partially.
Alexandre
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@go
Mike,
I recall reporting some weirdness on Windows 7, originating from the
randomized addressing issue.
(that's what rebase and rebaseall Cygwin utilities are/were fighting).
At that time Cygwin still had Python 2.5.
Is it correct that since then it has fixed itself, as Cygwin folks
found a way t
On 4/16/11 2:04 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
As XP is becoming obsolete (it does not seem to be possible to easily buy it, or
a new computer with it preinstalled)
In fact, it's been end-of-lifed:
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/help/end-support
Jason
--
To post to this group, send a
On 4/16/11 8:16 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 4/16/11 2:04 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
As XP is becoming obsolete (it does not seem to be possible to easily
buy it, or
a new computer with it preinstalled)
In fact, it's been end-of-lifed:
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/help/end-support
Perhaps a bit off topic, but is there any possibility of Sage ever being
ported to Windows natively, i.e. without cygwin dependencies? We have a
couple thousand lines worth of shell scripts currently underpinning Sage,
and we'd probably have to convert those to Python or something to make them
A lot of the C code is Sage relies on posix, in particular fork() is not
provided by the Win32 API. So a plain Win32-version of Sage would be a very
invasive rewrite of a lot of stuff.
Even Microsoft noticed that you need to support posix for real work, so they
have SFU (Windows Services for UN
On Apr 19, 7:27 pm, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Perhaps a bit off topic, but is there any possibility of Sage ever being
> ported to Windows natively, i.e. without cygwin dependencies? We have a
> couple thousand lines worth of shell scripts currently underpinning Sage,
> and we'd probably have to conv
On 4/19/11 9:32 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Similar tasks for Singular, Maxima, etc etc...
Maxima appears to already support Windows, at least in some shape or form:
http://maxima.sourceforge.net/download.html
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To uns
On 19 Apr., 13:27, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Perhaps a bit off topic, but is there any possibility of Sage ever being
> ported to Windows natively, i.e. without cygwin dependencies? We have a
> couple thousand lines worth of shell scripts currently underpinning Sage,
> and we'd probably have to conve
If you are fine with using a virtual machine then just punch the notebook
port through. The only thing running native would be the browser rendering
the worksheet. Of course you need admin rights to install a virtual machine,
and there can be only one hypervisor on the system. So you'll never ha
Perhaps even farther off topic;
I doubt that Cygwin (Cygwin/X) is in any case a good path for many/
most MS_Windows
folk - from THEIR point of view.
The path to getting Cygwin/X up and running "usefully" on a MS_Windows
platform
is long and arduous for the naive user, e.g. it was so for me.
Oracle
On Apr 20, 10:20 am, RegB <2regburg...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Perhaps even farther off topic;
> I doubt that Cygwin (Cygwin/X) is in any case a good path for many/
> most MS_Windows
> folk - from THEIR point of view.
> The path to getting Cygwin/X up and running "usefully" on a MS_Windows
> plat
On Apr 20, 10:20 pm, RegB <2regburg...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Perhaps even farther off topic;
> I doubt that Cygwin (Cygwin/X) is in any case a good path for many/
> most MS_Windows
> folk - from THEIR point of view.
> The path to getting Cygwin/X up and running "usefully" on a MS_Windows
> plat
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> I recall reporting some weirdness on Windows 7, originating from the
> randomized addressing issue.
> (that's what rebase and rebaseall Cygwin utilities are/were fighting).
> At that time Cygwin still had Python 2.5.
>
> Is it correct that
Mike,
On 16 April 2011 14:36, Mike Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> I recall reporting some weirdness on Windows 7, originating from the
>> randomized addressing issue.
>> (that's what rebase and rebaseall Cygwin utilities are/were fighting).
>> At that
On 19 April 2011 12:27, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Perhaps a bit off topic, but is there any possibility of Sage ever being
> ported to Windows natively, i.e. without cygwin dependencies? We have a
> couple thousand lines worth of shell scripts currently underpinning Sage,
> and we'd probably have to co
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Georg S. Weber
wrote:
>
>
> On 19 Apr., 13:27, Keshav Kini wrote:
>> Perhaps a bit off topic, but is there any possibility of Sage ever being
>> ported to Windows natively, i.e. without cygwin dependencies? We have a
>> couple thousand lines worth of shell scripts
On 04/20/11 04:21 AM, William Stein wrote:
Python was annoyingly seriously broke on Cygwin for about 8 months.
Gary understood exactly what the problem was, but the Cygwin dev's
didn't seem to agree... at least not until several months.At the
time (5 years ago), at least, it was very difficu
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> If you are fine with using a virtual machine then just punch the notebook
> port through. The only thing running native would be the browser rendering
> the worksheet.
I think that this is the whole point no matter what approach we take;
the
Why not move this thread to the sage-windows group?
John
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 20, 10:20 pm, RegB <2regburg...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Perhaps even farther off topic;
>> I doubt that Cygwin (Cygwin/X) is in any case a good path for many/
>> most MS_
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:07 AM, John Cremona wrote:
> Why not move this thread to the sage-windows group?
+1 -- I cross-posted my response there.
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Apr 20, 10:20 pm, RegB <2regburg...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> Perhap
[Please respond on sage-windows...]
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> If you are fine with using a virtual machine then just punch the notebook
> port through. The only thing running native would be the browser rendering
> the worksheet. Of course you need admin rights to ins
yep. core 2 duo T7250 2 gb ddr2 Sdram on a vaio vgn-fz21m sony laptop with
vista home premium 32 bit.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> Does anyone have access to a Core 2 machine (any speed) with Windows
> on it. Brian Gladman of the MPIR project has ported some new assembly
>
Thanks for the reply ahmet. Turns out we need 64 bit windows, which I
should have mentioned.
However I have just been told we in fact have Windows figures for Core
2. So somehow I have got this mixed up. It was linux on Core 2 we
needed. But of course that is trivial.
Thanks for your help, but w
93 matches
Mail list logo
