Developers may want to take note of this upcoming change in MediaWiki.
Markus
Original Message
Subject: [Wikitech-l] New methods to use when checking if a title is
part of a namespace
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 06:04:17 -0800
From: Daniel Friesen li...@nadir-seen-fire.com
On 08/11/11 18:51, Samuel Lampa wrote:
Thanks Jeroen!
Yes, have been checking at least the SMW_Exporter.php a bit, but will
probably have to dig a little more ... just hoped someone else had
already been here done that :)
Yes, the getExportData() functions have moved from the individual DVs
On 02/11/11 16:27, Yaron Koren wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I, for one, think I've seen your emails - it looks like you've had two
emails recently that weren't responded to, one about SMW and
different skins and one about More than one form for a page; but
others have been responded to.
In general,
On 01/11/11 00:54, Jonathan Lang wrote:
Markus Krötzsch wrote:
I would like to give an aggregated reply to the discussions around having
formatting strings with {{{markers}}} to be part of #subobject declarations.
Decision: we will not implement this.
Reason: MediaWiki has templates
On 31/10/11 19:20, Samuel Lampa wrote:
On 10/31/2011 07:43 PM, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
The extension of this code would make sense in SMW. One could also
imagine that this is later used for importing SPARQL results into SMW
data for general forms of SPARQL queries.
I'm not sure I followed
On 31/10/11 19:17, Samuel Lampa wrote:
On 10/31/2011 07:55 PM, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
On 31/10/11 18:13, Samuel Lampa wrote:
On 10/31/2011 06:52 PM, Samuel Lampa wrote:
=== Q2: Status of SMWData/SMWDataItem as API? ===
Also I wondered what status the SMWData/SMWDataItem classes are
supposed
On 01/11/11 14:11, Jonathan Lang wrote:
Markus Krötzsch wrote:
Ok, fair point. The explanation should then include that SMW is conceived as
a data management extension, but tries to keep small on data
formatting/visualisation. So the real reason is the overall project goal.
Fair enough
On 30/10/11 21:43, Stephan Gambke wrote:
Hi Markus,
Am 30.10.2011 12:12, schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
Thanks. What I now implemented requires naming for all subobjects, so it
is not optional. One could have another parser function that does not
require a name; overloading #subobject to do both
On 31/10/11 17:52, Samuel Lampa wrote:
On 09/25/2011 11:05 AM, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
RDF data is represented by a smaller set of classes under SMWExpElement.
These classes represent triples for the purpose of serialisation (they
abstract RDF before fixing a concrete syntax such as RDF/XML
On 31/10/11 18:13, Samuel Lampa wrote:
On 10/31/2011 06:52 PM, Samuel Lampa wrote:
=== Q2: Status of SMWData/SMWDataItem as API? ===
Also I wondered what status the SMWData/SMWDataItem classes are supposed
to have, as a general API? ... Are they the supposed API, or is SMW
going towards
On 28/10/11 19:30, Samuel Lampa wrote:
JFYI, I'm taking one week off from work, next week, to try to do
something about RDFIO, to get it in a usable state, and hopefully do
quite a lot of overall improvements as well.
I summarized the plans here:
, as these technically connote behavior.
How about vector?
-Original Message-
*From:* Jon Lang [mailto:datawea...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, October 23, 2011 3:48 PM
*To:* Yury Katkov
*Cc:* Semediawiki-user; Markus Krötzsch; Semantic MediaWiki developers
*Subject:* Re: [SMW-devel] RFC
is technically accurate, nor object for that
matter, as these technically connote behavior.
How about vector?
-Original Message-
*From:* Jon Lang [mailto:datawea...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, October 23, 2011 3:48 PM
*To:* Yury Katkov
*Cc:* Semediawiki-user; Markus Krötzsch; Semantic
can contain these.
The use of a special property (currently called has subobject) should
solve this now. All subobjects now appear on Special:Browse and also on
the property page Property:Has_subobject.
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Markus Krötzsch [mailto:mar...@semantic
know if you discover any display problems with page names.
On 03/10/11 10:02, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
Following up the discussions we had at SMWCon in Berlin, we have now
implemented a new feature for internal objects in SMW. This email
explains this feature and starts the discussion on some
I am happy to forward the below announcement. The new Wikidata project
will soon be taking the ideas behind SMW to the next level. And quite a
few positions need to be filled.
Interesting times to look forward to! :-)
Markus
Original Message
Subject: [Wikitech-l] Open
Overall, I share Lydia's concerns that we may not be able to provide
sufficient support in this case. I think taking part in this is a great
responsibility that we should take very serious, and at least I for my
part do not think that I could commit to this effort now.
I do not think that this
a
wiki page but the abstract case cannot, maybe solution 2 is the
preferable option. That way,people won't go around NOT making
wiki pages about things that really ought to have pages made
about them.
-Clarence
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Markus
On 05/10/11 15:02, Gregor Hagedorn wrote:
Would these subobjects interfere at some stage with the support of
multi-value properties or replace them? Or will they remain an additional
feature like the SIOs?
Multi-valued properties in SMW 1.6 are already a special kind of
subobject. Both kinds
On 03/10/11 19:22, Dan Bolser wrote:
On 3 October 2011 16:48, Markus Krötzschmar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
wrote:
On 03/10/11 10:50, Dan Bolser wrote:
...
Thanks Markus,
Perhaps a very dumb question, but what advantages are there to using
subobjects over real pages?
i.e. When is it
On 03/10/11 22:58, John McClure wrote:
Markus,
#subobject is great to hear about, though I look at
http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Version and I don't see it yet
listed as a parser function; is there a schedule in mind for public testing?
And I'm not understanding how records are
by making a wiki page but the abstract
case cannot, maybe solution 2 is the preferable option. That way,people
won't go around NOT making wiki pages about things that really ought to
have pages made about them.
-Clarence
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic
Following up the discussions we had at SMWCon in Berlin, we have now
implemented a new feature for internal objects in SMW. This email
explains this feature and starts the discussion on some open questions
for it to become stable.
== Goal ==
Allow SMW annotations to refer to objects that
On 03/10/11 10:50, Dan Bolser wrote:
...
Thanks Markus,
Perhaps a very dumb question, but what advantages are there to using
subobjects over real pages?
i.e. When is it recommended to use a subobject over a regular page?
(That is, disregarding peoples sensibilities over 'too many' or
of subobject work well together (i.e., one can
have Type:Record properties in subobjects). It is not planned to drop
record support.
Markus
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 10:02:32 +0100, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org wrote:
Following up the discussions we had at SMWCon in Berlin, we have now
On 29/09/11 13:05, Toni Hermoso Pulido wrote:
Hello,
I was checking http://semantic-mediawiki.org/ and current version
number is 1.6.2, but it doesn't appear here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/semediawiki/files/semediawiki/
SMW 1.6.2 provides a few bugfixes that we wanted to make
On 01/10/11 11:17, Samuel Lampa wrote:
On 10/01/2011 09:54 AM, Dan Bolser wrote:
On 1 October 2011 02:50, Samuel Lampasamuel.lamp...@rilnet.com wrote:
On 09/06/2011 04:13 PM, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
One can of course always query for the rdfs:label with all data to have
some hope for getting
On 05/09/11 15:34, Mauricio Etchevest wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on an new extension for SMW.
Great.
There're two things that don't work out:
My extension has to generate new semantic annotations without any user
input,
Anybody could tell me how to start ? Any recommendations on what to
to be extended with an optional RDF store.
Markus
*From:* Dan Bolser dan.bol...@gmail.com
*To:* Markus Krötzsch mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
*Cc:* Chris Davis c_b_...@yahoo.com;
semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Sent:* Monday, September 5, 2011 2
Your aggregated wishes are my command. Should work now.
Markus
On 05/09/11 13:59, Dan Bolser wrote:
+1
Dan.
Don't panic. Don't be Google.
On 15 August 2011 20:52, Jeroen De Dauwjeroended...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for installing SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi extension.
--
Jeroen De Dauw
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org mailto:mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
wrote:
On 05/09/11 15:34, Mauricio Etchevest wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on an new extension for SMW.
Great.
There're two things that don't
FYI: Translatewiki.net goes semantic (second news item below).
Cheers,
Markus
Original Message
Subject:translatewiki.net newsletter - Let's celebrate MediaWiki 1.18
and Kiwix!
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:58:17 +0200
From: Siebrand Mazeland s.mazel...@xs4all.nl
On 28/08/11 22:55, Yaron Koren wrote:
Hi everyone,
The SMWAskAPI extension adds an action to the MediaWiki API, ask,
that lets you call SMW queries via api.php:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:SMWAskAPI
I didn't think such a thing was necessary, since the Special:Ask page
On 26/08/11 15:31, Chris Davis wrote:
Am I correct in observing that SMW 1.6 does not support sparql queries
directly included in wiki pages, but only allows for ask queries which
are then translated into sparql syntax?
The reason for the question is that I'm one of the developers of the
Dear Developers,
since MW 1.17, the Resource Loader (RL) is a convenient and efficient
way for including styles and scripts into pages (see [1] for details).
However, SMW also supports MW 1.16, so it has hitherto been stuck with
some old code that did not take advantage of the new features.
[All apologies for cross-posting]
We are happy to announce that you can now register for
SMWCon Fall 2011
Berlin, September 21–23, 2011
http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/SMWCon_Fall_2011
Registration is at
On 02/08/11 16:37, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
Both issues seem specific to older versions of the relevant extensions.
Upgrading them should fix the problem. Only Markus can do this though.
Ok, I have a list of software upgrades to do on the server already, so I
will just add this. I hope to
On 30/07/11 01:10, Samuel Lampa wrote:
Hi,
I got a reported bug (per mail) with the initSMWWriter function in the
PageHandler class in RDFIO [1] (For complete code, see: [2]), which seem
to be due to some API changes in SMW, for which I'd need some guidance.
When trying to import the test
On 13/07/11 20:23, Günther Zehetner wrote:
Hi,
Does this mean for a record property like [[Item::Name;Source]] where Name
and Source are defined as property String it is in SMW 1.6 not possible
anymore to see in the database which value is used for Name and which for
Source? So either
On 29/06/11 16:39, zehetner wrote:
Hi,
does somebody know if SMW 1.6 still keeps for multivalue (record type)
properties the information about the order of the single values somewhere
in the database or if that got lost?
Up to now in table atts2 the field p_id allowed to identify (with the
Hi all,
this is just to let you know about a new feature of SMW 1.6:
There will be predefined properties for every known SMW datatype. For
example, the property String will always be of Type:String, and the
property Number will always be of Type:Number. These properties can
also be addressed
On 08/07/11 20:55, Stephan Gambke wrote:
Hi Markus,
Am 08.07.2011 20:20, schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
On 08/07/11 14:30, Stephan Gambke wrote:
Hi James,
Semantic Glossary (Version 0.1 alpha)(r91693) + Lingo
well, r91449 implemented some changes that I do not really like.
Basically
On 10/07/11 14:10, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
A recent change in SVN (Jeroen?) has moved the creation of value
lists to the container dataitem of SMW which (as explained above) cannot
possibly reconstruct the order.
Indeed, I was not aware that order is relevant in that code. Will have a
[Please keep discussions on the devel list for future reference.]
[Summary for the list: this discussion covers recent changes in ]
[the subobject management of SMW 1.6, which also affect SIO.]
On 08/07/11 03:41, Yaron Koren wrote:
Hi,
I think I just fixed this in the SVN version of SIO. I
[Including to the devel list again.]
On 08/07/11 14:30, Stephan Gambke wrote:
Hi James,
Semantic Glossary (Version 0.1 alpha)(r91693) + Lingo
Stephan somehow the Glossary stopped working after updating to all new
SMW, SF ,SRF SVN versions, maybe if you have time you might verify
On 12/06/11 08:40, Devayon Das wrote:
Hi,
what would be a quick way to programmatically check if a query is valid
or not without actually fetching results? I tried putting malformed
queries into Semantic Search, but I get all results (which probably eats
up a lot of CPU cycles) before I see a
Hi Leonard,
is the SMWQueryResult object that you get from query answering not
exactly what you want? It basically encodes the structure of a three
dimensional array (rows -- cells in row -- values in cell), but using
custom SMW classes for convenient (and efficient) access to the data.
The
Dear SMW Community,
we are happy to announce that SMWCon Fall 2011 will be held in Berlin on
the days of September 21 to 23. Following the success of the SMWCon
Spring 2011, it will feature a similar three-day setup with an
additional hands-on/tutorial day before the two conference days.
The
[Forwarding to the list as this might be of general interest]
On 07/06/11 04:24, Yaron Koren wrote:
Hi Markus,
I'm modifying Semantic Internal Objects to work with SMW 1.6. SIO
currently has some code that creates an object of type SMWDataValue, and
calls getDBkeys() on it. That is now
of
if ( !$this-isValid() ) {
Yes! Changed in SVN now.
Markus
On Tue, 31 May 2011 16:02:37 +0100, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org wrote:
On 30/05/11 11:48, zehetner wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to change my php code to work with SMW 1.6. (MW 1.16.0, SMW
1.6
alpha r89160)
I updated
SMWPropertyValue is the right way to go.
Cheers,
Markus
On Thu, 26 May 2011 07:40:32 +0100, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org wrote:
On 25/05/11 11:20, zehetner wrote:
Hi,
regarding
* Type:Record declarations change:
Properties of Type:Record no longer take a list of types
On 12/05/11 08:39, Joel Natividad wrote:
For our friends in Europe,
You may want to check out
http://opendatachallenge.org
I think SMW is just made to order for this challenge :)
I had this on my radar before, but I do not think that SMW is completely
at the heart of this call, since they
.
- Markus
Στις 24/4/2011 1:27 μμ, ο/η Markus Krötzsch έγραψε:
On 24/04/11 06:56, Anastasios Milios wrote:
Dear All,
I am modifying the the Semantic forms and i would like to add some text
in Greek Language.
Lokking at the SF_Messages.php in the language folder the Greek
Charcters are dsplayed
to work with it.
Markus
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#funcex-regex
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/#t41
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/#t413
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org mailto:mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
I am happy to announce that SMW now natively supports data
synchronization with any SPARQL-capable RDF store. This email explains
how this works, what the status is, and how interested users can test it
with their own wikis and triples stores.
It would be helpful if interested users could test
On 16/04/11 02:37, Robert Murphy wrote:
OK, so then why are namespaces proliferating?
Robert,
I think you have a valid point: one should not have extra namespaces if
not really needed. There are good uses of namespaces, however, and we
should not artificially avoid namespaces if these uses
Reminder: GSoC applicants should not forget to submit their official
applications by today.
-- Markus
Original Message
Subject: [Wikitech-l] Google Sumer of Code
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 20:18:40 +0200
From: Jeroen De Dauw jeroended...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia developers
On 07/04/11 15:09, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
...
Note that SMW trunk is currently not so stable due to significant
refactoring for SMW 1.6.
In fact, there are so significant changes to the datatype system going
on that I do strongly encourage anyone who wants to make changes in SMW
Core --
Developers should note the below changes in future MW. They especially
affect Special page coding (which we do a lot in our extensions).
Cheers,
Markus
Original Message
Subject: [Wikitech-l] Some changes to $wgOut, $wgUser, Skin,and
SpecialPage code patterns
Date: Sat,
On 15/10/10 15:35, Gregor Hagedorn wrote:
We would like to use the ability of SMW to internally convert units,
e.g. length regardless whether this is given in m, cm, or mm, but
without the tooltip-popup, which can be seen, e.g. in:
http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Sol
when the mouse
-Wuerttemberg and
National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association
-Original Message-
From: Markus Krötzsch [mailto:mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 1:11 PM
To: Samuel Lampa
Cc: semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net SMW developer list
To: Semantic MediaWiki developers; Semantic MediaWiki users
Cc: Markus Krötzsch
Subject: Re: [Semediawiki-user] News on RDF export
Hey,
SMW_dumpRDF.php got broken by the changes, but Markus fixed it earlier
today.
Cheers
--
Jeroen De Dauw
http://blog.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't
named graphs).
The initial goal of the RDF store project is to improve query
performance by taking advantage of optimised SPARQL implementations of
RDF stores.
Markus
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org mailto:mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
wrote
On 28/03/11 12:05, nazif berat wrote:
Teşekkür ederim,
NazifBerat
You can unsubscribe by following the link at the bottom of every email.
This is the same webform that you used for subscribing.
Please do not send unsubscribe requests to this list. The members of
this list cannot do the
Hi Yuri,
thank you for your interest. Contributions are very welcome! We plan to
use an RDF store as a backend for storing and querying data. This will
not completely abolish the use of MySQL tables, but at least all queries
should be answered by the triple store (no more SQL-based #ask). We
Dear SMW users,
there will be a number of internal changes in SMW as we move towards SMW
1.6. This means that the SVN code may not be compatible any more with
all SMW extensions that work with SMW 1.5.*. Also, there might be some
(hopefully) temporary issues with new code that was not tested
data integration will be really interested in
learning
the issues and how to work around them (if they won't be fixed in time).
Markus and Tim, can you be more specific here?
Thanks,
Jesse
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic
On 22/03/11 03:01, Yaron Koren wrote:
Very interesting... I didn't know that was their official response now.
I don't think that conveys the full relationship they have with SMW, but
it's still good to know.
The performance problems that Wikia has with SMW are very real, even if
caused in no
below SMW's factory limits. Doing this is much
harder once you have given your users the option of using larger queries ...
Cheers,
Markus
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org mailto:mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
wrote:
On 22/03/11 03:01, Yaron
On 17/03/11 10:12, Veliqi wrote:
Hi,
I am developing an extension for SMW and I need to know how to get
(with which method) the attribute called 'm_values' in the
SMWNAry-Class?
Hi Veliqi,
the current version of SMW does not have a class called SMWNAry. This
code has been
On 16/03/11 10:38, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
Is it worth giving it another chance at the MediaWiki Hackathon in
Berlin in May, though, assuming you're going to that? Perhaps in person
people will be less likely to just ignore the issue? It's only two
months away, so maybe it's worth
I would like to simplify the SMW datatype system, and I would like to be
aware of potential dependencies in *your* code. Hence my questions:
(1) Are you using the method getDBKeys() of any SMWDataValue object in
your code?
(2) Have you ever implemented a new subclass of SMWDataValue?
If so,
On 15/03/11 12:13, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
Semantic Maps has a subclass of SMWDataValue for the coordinates data
type (which implements getDBKeys), and uses getDBKeys on instances of
this class in the SMWValueDescription deriving class for coordinates.
Of course, I am aware of this one! I
On 15/03/11 13:34, Dan Bolser wrote:
Anyone know / guess why a) the limit is 20, b) the query goes awry at the
limit?
MediaWiki has a global restriction on the number of parser functions
that may be used on one page. Maybe this or a similar MW emergency
break could be a reason for this
On 15/03/11 16:39, Benjamin Langguth wrote:
Hi,
that's a bit confusing for me because 'offset' is just working fine for
my standalone inline queries.
E.g. for 4 existing instances of 'Category:Test'
{{#ask:[[Category:Test]]
|offset=3
}}
displays only one result.
So i think it is (or
On 15/03/11 17:39, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
Instead of extending the array-based parameter definitions used now, I
think it makes a lot of sense to use the Validator extension for that.
Originally it also had an array-based approach, but this gets really
messy, complex and hard to
Dear all,
for the first time this year, we will apply for hosting our own
semantic Google Summer of Code (GSoC) projects. In past years, our
projects were done through the Wikimedia Foundation, leading to such
successful projects as Semantic Maps and RDFIO.
We will soon (Mar 11) submit our
Dear all,
SMW is planning to participate in Google Summer of Code this year (in
previous years, we did this under the umbrella of the Wikimedia
Foundation). This is a great opportunity for young hackers from around
the world to make key contributions to SMW-related projects while
earning both
of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and
National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association
-Original Message-
From: Markus Krötzsch [mailto:mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 6:16 PM
To: Benedikt Kaempgen
Cc: SMW developer list
Subject: Re: [SMW-devel] Pretty
AM, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org mailto:mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
wrote:
On 03/03/2011 20:58, Laurent Alquier wrote:
Hi all
I finally took the time to drill down in the code for Exhibit and
enable
links back to individual pages
On 02/03/2011 14:42, Benedikt Kaempgen wrote:
Hi,
I think it would be interesting for some to have some description in the
manual of how to have pretty URLs in SMW:
That seems very useful, yes. Logically, this would be part of the
administrator's manual, and could be linked from the relevant
set up
some such examples. Meanwhile, contributions are welcome.
Regards,
Markus
Am 24.02.2011 11:40, schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
On 24/02/2011 09:41, Yury Katkov wrote:
Hello everyone!
I'm trying to make Semantic MediaWiki extension and observing the
documentation. I checked the Programmer
In reply to the original email and the suggestions that followed:
(1) I agree that it would be good if users could easily specify feature
requests, and if there was some way of finding out how much each of them
is wanted.
(2) This could also inspire new extension projects. Users may not know
instead of Semantic Drilldown (if it is
actually found to cause problems on such large/high-traffic wikis).
- Markus
2011/2/23 Markus Krötzsch mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
mailto:mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
[Making this into a new thread]
Hi Krzysztof,
I was already wondering
, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org mailto:mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
wrote:
Some insightful comments on how to grow and sustain contributor
communities in OSS:
Original Message
Subject: [Wikitech-l] Roadmaps and getting and keeping devs
!)
Email: benedikt.kaemp...@kit.edu
Web: http://www.kit.edu/
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and
National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association
-Original Message-
From: Markus Krötzsch [mailto:mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 10:02
Some insightful comments on how to grow and sustain contributor
communities in OSS:
Original Message
Subject: [Wikitech-l] Roadmaps and getting and keeping devs
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:55:34 +
From: David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Wikimedia developers
On 26/01/2011 17:59, Ellis, Peter C wrote:
Greetings, all -
Is there a way to configure Semantic MediaWiki so that properties are defined
in more than one namespace? Here's the situation: we have a system that
automatically populates wikis with a certain set of predefined properties
that
Actually, we even already have an open bug report for this problem:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26658
- Markus
On 10/02/2011 15:02, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
On 09/02/2011 19:19, Alex M. Hendler wrote:
Dear SMW Development Team,
Thank you very much for the recent(?) changes
Reopening this thread, just to comment on this briefly:
You are right, it is possible that properties that are set automatically
for pages must be set in two situations. The main reason is:
(1) SMW's only method for storing data *replaces* the current data with
the data that is given. It does
. But it was not
meant to behave differently upon transclusion.
- Markus
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org mailto:mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
wrote:
Actually, we even already have an open bug report for this problem:
https
On 10/02/2011 16:09, Benedikt Kaempgen wrote:
Hello,
I would like to add Inline Editing functionality to SMW, so that users can
edit values of properties directly when clicking on them.
One way to this would be to have some RDFa surrounding the annotations so
that after a user has changed
On 26/01/2011 16:59, don undeen wrote:
hey all,
I'm wondering if anyone else has seen this:
in some of my templates, I've got html tags; some for layout, like
pre
and
div
and others for functionality, like
headertabs/
however, when I try to load a page with that templte, in place of
On 25/01/2011 00:14, Hull, Ryan E wrote:
I am doing some work that requires me to get all distinct values for a
given property across all wiki pages. I see in the API that we have
access to SMWSQLStore2::getPropertyValues but this only returns unique
property values. If a property is listed
On 09/01/2011 02:50, Yaron Koren wrote:
Hi,
I have no idea - I don't think I've heard of that happening before. But I'd
suggest upgrading to the latest version, 0.8.1 - there's at least some
chance that that will fix the problem.
The answer is simple: the method that was mentioned in the
On 07/01/2011 09:56, Pierre Mz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008, Andreas Wombacher wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know whether there is somebody now working on an ask
api. I need such an api and if there is no one working on it would
consider doing it myself.
If you are already working on it, is
On 07/01/2011 13:12, Samuel Lampa wrote:
Maybe you have seen this already, but I thought it worth mentioning,
since I guess it probably has some consequences for the RDFIO extension
in particular, and the discussions about consolidating RDF/SPARQL
functionality, in general:
Hi,
I've used the holidays to rework the RDF serialisation and export
facility of SMW. The changes that are now in SVN include:
* Support for Turtle syntax (e.g. use syntax=turtle as a parameter to
when calling Special:ExportRDF; not sure if it makes sense to add a GUI
option for this)
* New
On 01/12/2010 20:37, don undeen wrote:
will this then require re-integrating with all the existing extensions that
handle Images, so these are treat just like Images in their interfaces?
(RichMedia, WYSIWYG editor, etc?)
My solution does only create a new type for SMW properties so that the
On 01/12/2010 17:54, Neill Mitchell wrote:
Hi Don.
No, it's just a link that is published plus a thumbnail if desired. Then
when you click on it in the wiki it opens a tab to the DAM page.
This sounds as if it could be realised with manageable effort (depending
on your familiarity with the
101 - 200 of 577 matches
Mail list logo
