A question about Squid ACL's (from an existing config I'm working on).
Let's say the config file defines (in this order) these ACL's and rules:
acl foo src 1.2.3.4
acl bar url_regex -i .bar.com
http_access allow foo
http_access allow foo bar
http_access deny all
The second http_access line is
Sonia Hamilton wrote:
A question about Squid ACL's (from an existing config I'm working on).
Let's say the config file defines (in this order) these ACL's and rules:
acl foo src 1.2.3.4
acl bar url_regex -i .bar.com
http_access allow foo
http_access allow foo bar
http_access deny all
The
Hi Martin, All,
thanks. I realized that vhost was missing and put it in. squid still fails.
internally the ip addresses are as follows...
10.1.2.249 www.pamphlets.org.au
10.1.2.250 www.icafe.com.au
10.1.2.252 squid.icafe.com.au
If I have the config as below, I only ever get www.icafe.com.au
Hi Martin,
just a straight copy and paste of your suggestion into a new default
squid.conf file under the following line...
#INSERT YOUR OWN RULE(S) HERE TO ALLOW ACCESS FROM YOUR CLIENTS
acl our_sites dstdomain www.icafe.com.au www.pamphlets.org.au
*.pamphlets.org.au *.icafe.com.au
acl
Hi Martin,
Mate you are a genius!
All working now.
I just moved the lines as you suggested. Nothing else and both sites
working. I'm going to run up a third site and add it in to the mix. Then
carefully doco how this is done.
I definitely owe you at least a beer.
Thanks again.
Ben
Hi all
Just posting this here so that it gets saved in the SLUG archives and
may help someone in the same situation in future.
The following configuration has been successfully tested and more sites
should be easily added by adding to the following config.
The following was added to a default
Hi all,
Just to get squid reverse proxy 2.6 working with two sites for now... it
seems to be working in that the access.log is registering hits but only
for the default site.
Default site is www.icafe.com.au
other site is www.pamphlets.org.au
If I bypass squid, I can port forward port 80 to
On 7/30/07, Stephen Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been hitting the Linux documentation hard and after much learning I
think I have decided on a course of action.
I would like to get another computer and set up a Proxy Server for my network
security and peace of mind.
I have no idea
Try a firewall distro like Clark Connect (there are others too). There
is a free community version, great web interface and a lot of functions;
email and web servers, routing, port forwarding, vpn. A good thing.
Max
Stephen Black wrote:
I have been hitting the Linux documentation hard and
squid is proxying software, youd best use apache for web serving
Dean
Stephen Black wrote:
I have been hitting the Linux documentation hard and after much learning I
think I have decided on a course of action.
I would like to get another computer and set up a Proxy Server for my network
Stephen Black wrote:
I hear that squid is a popular proxy server but could I also use Squid as a
file server for a web site that I will develop on the server?
Squid is an excellent http proxy. However, it cannot as far as I
know act as a http server.
However, if you want a http server,
I have been hitting the Linux documentation hard and after much learning I
think I have decided on a course of action.
I would like to get another computer and set up a Proxy Server for my network
security and peace of mind.
I hear that squid is a popular proxy server but could I also use
I'm stumped at the moment and I've been doing firewalls and setting up
squid for years.
My client has an ISP firewall, their own firewall, a proxy on the DMZ and
an internal firewall and wishes to access a couple of http based services
on ports 81 and 8000. Not usually a problem. I have
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 01:18:48 +1000, Grant Parnell - EverythingLinux wrote:
lynx http://www.some.site:81/ it returns a 503 and I can see NO PACKETS
going to the site with tcpdump. Exactly the same with port 8000. The error
Is your access blocked by an acl, e.g. Safe_ports?:
[EMAIL
Title: Squid accelerator + SSL
I'm not sure if this is even possible. We have an Exchange server behind our Linux firewall runnning webmail on port 80. Would it be possible to run Squid as an accelerator on the firewall but adding SSL to it? So basically within our lan it uses http but from
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 12:00 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure if this is even possible. We have an Exchange server
behind our Linux firewall runnning webmail on port 80. Would it be
possible to run Squid as an accelerator on the firewall but adding
SSL to it? So basically
So, the way that we do this, along with a million other suckers running
IIS is to use apache and mod_proxy and/or mod_backhand. Our apache
server is configured to only serve SSL (i.e. redirects requests to port
80 to 443), and we have a vhost for the site in question, with mod_proxy
pushing
it is an intermittent problem.
I guess I will post a bug report.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Saenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 8:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: slug@slug.org.au
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Squid: Sometimes files stop downloading after 1 mb
what is your config file
what is your config file like? are you caching sites? how much disk
space do you have? is your system swapping heaps?
We have one squid server with 1Ghz CPU, 1 Gb RAM and 2 TB of disk space
looking after 2800 ppl
Hey SLUG,
We are experiencing a strange problem with Squid. We start Squid and it
Hey SLUG,
We are experiencing a strange problem with Squid. We start Squid and it
runs fine at first. Then after a period of time it gets into a state
where when downloading a file after just before it reaches the 1 mb mark
the download pauses as if it has timed out. Once Squid is in this state
Does anyone know of any addon to Squid (probably commercial) that will
provide, and more importantly, maintain a database of porn sites that
can be blocked.
I have a church school wanting this and we are running Squid on Linux as
a transparent proxy.
--
Howard.
LANNet Computing Associates;
Your
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:24:07 +1100, Howard Lowndes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know of any addon to Squid (probably commercial) that will
provide, and more importantly, maintain a database of porn sites that
can be blocked.
I have a church school wanting this and we are running
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 14:27 +1100, Michael Fox wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:24:07 +1100, Howard Lowndes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know of any addon to Squid (probably commercial) that will
provide, and more importantly, maintain a database of porn sites that
can be blocked.
Hi All
Was wondering if someone had any ideas on a squid.conf file, as I can't seem
to get mine to work, the error I'm getting in the logs is below.
1100265318.516666 10.1.1.40 TCP_DENIED/403 1345 GET
http://www.google.com.au
/ - NONE/- text/html
I have opend my firewall, at least I hope I
Sluggers,
Quick Squid Question,
is it possible to detect the users browser (assume yes) and then block /
ignore the request based on the browser being used (dunno).
I've been asked if it's possible to prevent users for accessing the
internet via I.E and force them to use Mozilla because of the
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:55:49AM +1000, Peter Rundle wrote:
is it possible to detect the users browser (assume yes) and then block /
ignore the request based on the browser being used (dunno).
Something like this should work (warning: completely untested, if it
breaks you get to keep both
On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 10:55 +1000, Peter Rundle wrote:
Sluggers,
Quick Squid Question,
is it possible to detect the users browser (assume yes) and then block /
ignore the request based on the browser being used (dunno).
I've been asked if it's possible to prevent users for accessing
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:32, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 10:55 +1000, Peter Rundle wrote:
Sluggers,
Quick Squid Question,
is it possible to detect the users browser (assume yes) and then block /
ignore the request based on the browser being used (dunno).
I've been
Sluggers,
I've got a problem with my squid cache not refreshing for certain urls like;
http://www.bom.gov.au/weather/national/charts/synoptic.shtml
If I remove the proxy settings from the client it gets the latest chart. Also if I stop
squid and remake the cache dirs (squid -z) then the latest
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 11:40, Peter Rundle wrote:
Sluggers,
I've got a problem with my squid cache not refreshing for certain urls like;
http://www.bom.gov.au/weather/national/charts/synoptic.shtml
If I remove the proxy settings from the client it gets the latest chart. Also if I
Looking at that URL the BoM has gone to the trouble of including meta
http-equiv=Pragma content=no-cache in the page. Is your proxy
honouring that?
Apparently not but I'm not sure why. My refresh_pattern statement is a bland
refresh_pattern .0 20% 1440
I've just changed
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 06:40:02PM +1000, Grant Parnell wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Alexander Samad wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 12:04:02PM +1000, Broun, Bevan wrote:
Well, squid is running on linux!
Currently we run squid-2.4 latest stable, but upgrading to 2.5 lastest
stable
Well, squid is running on linux!
Currently we run squid-2.4 latest stable, but upgrading to 2.5 lastest
stable is an option and from my reading so far this is probably needed.
The current squid was compiled with --enable-auth-modules=SMB and we have
a file on NT domain controller to limit
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 12:04:02PM +1000, Broun, Bevan wrote:
Well, squid is running on linux!
Currently we run squid-2.4 latest stable, but upgrading to 2.5 lastest
stable is an option and from my reading so far this is probably needed.
The current squid was compiled with
Thank you all for your helpful links, for some reason when I searched
for reverse proxy I found howtos using apache mod_proxy
I guess it's testing time :).
I have been searching high and low, I was wondering if squid is capable
of doing reverse proxy?
Yup, it sure is. The following
I have been searching high and low, I was wondering if squid is capable
of doing reverse proxy?
--
Regards
Kevin Saenz
Spinaweb
Security, Trust, and Service
P: 02 46205130
F: 02 46259243
M: 04 18455661
W: www.spinaweb.com.au
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List -
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, ksaenz wrote:
I have been searching high and low, I was wondering if squid is capable
of doing reverse proxy?
Yup. Apparently its pretty good too, as Microsoft use it (on Linux too).
Try 'squid reverse proxy' in google.
Mike
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 11:47, ksaenz wrote:
I have been searching high and low, I was wondering if squid is capable
of doing reverse proxy?
Yup, it sure is. The following straight forward document should help:
http://www.ngogeeks.com/node/view/272
Regards,
Gonzalo
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 12:02, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 11:47, ksaenz wrote:
I have been searching high and low, I was wondering if squid is capable
of doing reverse proxy?
Yup, it sure is. The following straight forward document should help:
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 12:22, David Kempe wrote:
snipped
How can I get squid to behave in the same way (ie as though you
specified the upstream proxy in the browser) for just this domain?
You've probably solved this already, however
cache_peer_domain proxy.upstream.net.au partsales.com.au
will
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 18:45, Malcolm V wrote:
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 12:22, David Kempe wrote:
snipped
How can I get squid to behave in the same way (ie as though you
specified the upstream proxy in the browser) for just this domain?
You've probably solved this already, however
Robert Collins wrote:
never_direct is the thing you want.
Rob
I haven't solved it yet.
I tried this:
acl partsales dstdomain .partsales.com.au
cache_peer proxy.syd.pacific.net.au parent 8080 3130
cache_peer_access proxy.pacific.net.au allow partsales
never_direct allow partsales
And it just
David Kempe wrote:
the browser does work - whats wrong with my cache_peer statement?
replying to my own post :/
my cache_peer lacked a no-query qualifier.
seems I can't get ICP off the pacific proxies.
would have been nice for squid to tell me ICP didn't make it :/
oh well, thanks all for your
Hi sluggers,
I have a question about squid.
I am trying to allow access to a particular site for a client who has a
squid proxy. Access to the site works if you specifiy the ISP's upstream
cache in the browser prefs. Access does not work if you don't specify
the upstream proxy and if you have
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 17:11, DE LUCA Ben wrote:
I want to set up squid to pass all requests that it cant fulfill to my isp's
non transparent proxy.
Now I think the line is some thing like
cache_peer proxy.my.isp.com parent 8080 0 default no-query
snipped
Can I tell my proxy to only use
I want to set up squid to pass all requests that it cant fulfill to my isp's
non transparent proxy.
Now I think the line is some thing like
cache_peer proxy.my.isp.com parent 8080 0 default no-query
My machine still cache still seems to connect to not the parent but goes
looking for sites by
Tried the use defualt domain = yes , but did not seem to work.
This is authencticating through apache+pam
Alex
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 09:39:55AM +1000, Alexander Samad wrote:
Nope but I did try
winbind use default domain = yes - whihc gave me an error, not sure
where I got it from.
Hi,
I have a server with squirrelmail and cyrus (admin, common, imapd)
install and samba + winbind.
My question has any one gotten cyrus to authenticate users against a NT
domain using winbind through pam ?
I have been trying this, testing with squirrelmail.
I have setup winbind, getent
Well another 1/2 hour of playing with it fixed most of my problems,
seems like there are 2 pwcheck programs, one compiled to check just
/etc/shadow and the other to use the pam modules!
so a quick reconfigure and bobs your uncle.
But I still want to be able to map login ids to mailbox/email
Alexander Samad said:
Well another 1/2 hour of playing with it fixed most of my problems,
seems like there are 2 pwcheck programs, one compiled to check just
/etc/shadow and the other to use the pam modules!
so a quick reconfigure and bobs your uncle.
But I still want to be able to map
Nope but I did try
winbind use default domain = yes - whihc gave me an error, not sure
where I got it from.
Any way will give it a go and see what happens
Thanks
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 08:29:26AM +1000, Simon Bryan wrote:
Alexander Samad said:
Well another 1/2 hour of playing with it
G'day all,
Now I have the ntlm authentication working I need a squid logfile
parser/analyser that will
handle the usernames.
I am not having much luck, I have been using pwebstats but it doesn't handle
usernames at all.
Has anyone got any recommendations?
Ideally I would like monthly reports
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 12:02:11 +1000 Gareth Walters wrote:
G'day all,
Now I have the ntlm authentication working I need a squid logfile
parser/analyser that will
handle the usernames.
I am not having much luck, I have been using pwebstats but it doesn't
handle usernames at all.
I've been
Sarg and webalizer both Handle usernames
webalizer seems to be better for statistics and sarg for blaming people.
Depends on what you want it for
Jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/06/2003 12:02:11:
G'day all,
Now I have the ntlm authentication working I need a squid logfile
Gareth Walters said:
G'day all,
Now I have the ntlm authentication working I need a squid logfile
parser/analyser that will
handle the usernames.
I am not having much luck, I have been using pwebstats but it doesn't handle
usernames at all.
Has anyone got any recommendations?
Ideally I
G'day all,
I am setting up a new web proxy/cache using squid and I am trying to get
authentication working with squid from winbind.
The reasoning behind it was to avoid the username/password dialog for web access
but still force authentication.
The problem I am finding is after following the
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Gareth Walters wrote:
I am setting up a new web proxy/cache using squid and I am trying to get
authentication working with squid from winbind.
I've not actually done this specific method myself but I have used various
other proxy auth schemes.
The reasoning behind it
- Original Message -
From: James Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gareth Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] squid authentication with winbind.
Yeh it took me 3 days (on and off) to get squid+winbind (authenticating to a
Win2K in^H^HActive
On Fri, 30 May 2003 09:35 am, Gareth Walters wrote:
G'day all,
I am setting up a new web proxy/cache using squid and I am trying to get
authentication working with squid from winbind.
The reasoning behind it was to avoid the username/password dialog for web
access but still force
On Fri, 30 May 2003 11:51 am, Gareth Walters wrote:
- Original Message -
From: James Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gareth Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] squid authentication with winbind.
Yeh it took me 3 days (on and off) to get
On Fri, 30 May 2003 12:18 pm, James Gray wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2003 11:51 am, Gareth Walters wrote:
- Original Message -
From: James Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gareth Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] squid authentication
Gareth Walters said:
I am using IE and Mozilla, neither one ask for a username/password if I get rid
of the ntlm lines in squid.conf
then it pops up a dialog and works but otherwise all it does is fail.
I have checked and rechecked it. :(
Any ideas?
I also found that I needed to use the
Thanks for the help guys (James, Simon)
It all worked as soon as I updated to a newer version of samba 2.2.8a
---Gareth Walters
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
Short summary of the needed steps:
build samba with the winbindd channel enabled for client auth.
Get squid 2.5Stable 3. DO NOT use stable 1. Really.
build with --enable-auth=ntlm --enable-ntlm-auth-helpers=winbind
--with-samba-sources=/path/to/samba.headers
follow the samba FAQ on joining the
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: [SLUG] Squid, smb_auth and transparent proxying.
quote who=Robert Collins
Is there a way to make smb_auth work with squid and transparent
proxying?
No.
It's in the FAQ. IIRC it's in squid.conf.default
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 09:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Theoretically, yes.
No. NTLM does not fix the problems caused by interception (aka
transparent) caching.
What can I do to kill this meme?
Rob
Practically, I'm wading through documentation... Any pointers or
references appreciated...
G'day all,
I'm trialling using smb_auth for access to our squid proxy.
I'm using transparent proxying with squid, however I've found that this
won't allow access to permitted users, and I have to point the browser at
the proxy manually.
Is there a way to make smb_auth work with squid and
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using transparent proxying with squid, however I've found that this
won't allow access to permitted users, and I have to point the browser at
the proxy manually.
Is there a way to make smb_auth work with squid and transparent proxying?
Can
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 17:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day all,
I'm trialling using smb_auth for access to our squid proxy.
I'm using transparent proxying with squid, however I've found that this
won't allow access to permitted users, and I have to point the browser at
the proxy
quote who=Robert Collins
Is there a way to make smb_auth work with squid and transparent
proxying?
No.
It's in the FAQ. IIRC it's in squid.conf.default. And it was on this list
about a week ago.
There is a theoretical approach, but no-one has had time to implement it.
You can do
I'm trialling using smb_auth for access to our squid proxy.
I guess that is good for a small network what happens when the
network grows to a larger size and fixing acls for each user
in squid becomes a pain in the proverbial. But I can see an
up side given that Authentication through smb
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 17:21, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Robert Collins
Is there a way to make smb_auth work with squid and transparent
proxying?
No.
It's in the FAQ. IIRC it's in squid.conf.default. And it was on this list
about a week ago.
There is a theoretical
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 05:23:08PM +1100, Kevin Saenz wrote:
I'm trialling using smb_auth for access to our squid proxy.
I guess that is good for a small network what happens when the
network grows to a larger size and fixing acls for each user
in squid becomes a pain in the
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 17:31, Anthony Wood wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 05:23:08PM +1100, Kevin Saenz wrote:
I'm trialling using smb_auth for access to our squid proxy.
I guess that is good for a small network what happens when the
network grows to a larger size and fixing acls
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 17:23, Kevin Saenz wrote:
I'm trialling using smb_auth for access to our squid proxy.
I guess that is good for a small network what happens when the
network grows to a larger size and fixing acls for each user
in squid becomes a pain in the proverbial. But I can see
G'day all
We use Samba here (2.2.6) and Squid. Due to our high internet usage, I've
had to block access for most people.
I've been allowing access on an IP basis, however this isn't ideal (we use
dhcp) and I'd like to be able to block/allow access on a user-level basis.
Now, I understand
on Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:01:11AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day all
We use Samba here (2.2.6) and Squid. Due to our high internet usage, I've
had to block access for most people.
I've been allowing access on an IP basis, however this isn't ideal (we use
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:01 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day all
We use Samba here (2.2.6) and Squid. Due to our high internet usage, I've
had to block access for most people.
I've been allowing access on an IP basis, however this isn't ideal (we use
dhcp) and I'd like to be able to
I've been allowing access on an IP basis, however this isn't ideal (we use
dhcp) and I'd like to be able to block/allow access on a user-level basis.
Now, I understand that this can be done with PAM. Is winbind also
required?
you can do this with Squid and the NTLM stuff I think.. or you
PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [SLUG] Squid / SMB / PAM
on Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:01:11AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day all
We use Samba here (2.2.6) and Squid. Due to our high internet usage,
I've
had to block access for most people.
I've been allowing
on Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:38:33AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Samba server is a PDC (internal machine). Squid runs on the
gateway/firewall (seperate machine). Both are Mandrake 8.2 machines.
Squid is installed via the squid-2.4.STABLE4-2mdk.rpm (from Mandrake). Is
respond to brounb
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [SLUG] Squid / SMB / PAM
on Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:01:11AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day all
We use Samba here (2.2.6) and Squid. Due to our high
We use Samba here (2.2.6) and Squid. Due to our high internet usage, I've
had to block access for most people.
I've been allowing access on an IP basis, however this isn't
ideal (we use
dhcp) and I'd like to be able to block/allow access on a user-level basis.
Now, I understand that this
On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 12:01 PM, Simon Bryan wrote:
smb_auth is a doddle to setup if you have a Windows Domain, however it
asks
each user for a username and password when they start browsing, this
can
annoy some people. smb_auth is well documented. Winbind is not needed
in
this case.
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 12:08, Stewart wrote:
On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 12:01 PM, Simon Bryan wrote:
smb_auth is a doddle to setup if you have a Windows Domain, however it
asks
each user for a username and password when they start browsing, this
can
annoy some people. smb_auth
Gday Everyone,
Okay -- ive got a small Debian Server which serves samba shares, etc.
Clients can connect to the net through a small php file, which executes
pon.
Now my problem is that im running (well, at least trying) to run a squid
proxy server. However squid will refuse to work until the
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 20:52, Chris wrote:
Gday Everyone,
Okay -- ive got a small Debian Server which serves samba shares, etc.
Clients can connect to the net through a small php file, which executes
pon.
why not have ppp-up.d start squid?
However how can i get squid to start without being
I'm once again attempting to get a transparent proxy running here.
First, the problem: Forms that use the GET method (and conceivably the
post method also, but I haven't checked) time out. eg, for google:
1045317375.516 1031 192.168.9.20 TCP_MISS/200 1746 GET
http://www.google.com.au/ -
James Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1045317625.028 239153 192.168.9.20 TCP_MISS/504 1055 GET
http://www.google.com.au/search? - NONE/- -
^
# TAG: hierarchy_stoplist
# A list of words which, if found in a URL, cause the object to
# be handled directly
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 01:06, James Gregory wrote:
I'm once again attempting to get a transparent proxy running here.
First, the problem: Forms that use the GET method (and conceivably the
post method also, but I haven't checked) time out. eg, for google:
Details: ISP block port 80
Hello,
I just joined the list and this is my first posting. I am new to Linux so some of the questions may be trivial.
As an experiment I installed mandrake 9 on one old box with the intention to use it as a gateway/mail/proxy server replacing a w2k box with 602Pro LanSuite (which works
:
Subject:[SLUG] Squid - configuration or telstra issue
Hello,
I just joined the list and this is my first posting. I am new to Linux so
some of the questions may be trivial.
As an experiment I installed mandrake 9 on one old box with the intention
to use it as a gateway/mail/proxy server
I originally posted this to the Squid list but have had no response so
hoping someone here can help.
Hi all,
I am having trouble getting ntlm authentication to work!!
Have installed winbind and it tests OK.
Have finally worked out how to compile Squid with ntlm support.
wb_group (see below)
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 10:18, Simon Bryan wrote:
I originally posted this to the Squid list but have had no response so
hoping someone here can help.
Not true - Henrik replied to your email. We're waiting for you to follow
up on his suggestion.
Rob
--
GPG key available at:
(Apologies if you've seen this on the squid list,
but I'm a bit desperate)
Is it possible to use squid without using DNS
at all?
I am using single parent cache, and I don't
need names in my log files.
So I don't think I _need_ DNS, but I can't see
if there is way to tell squid not to do any
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 05:10:24PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to use squid without using DNS
at all?
Why do you want to do this?
I am using single parent cache, and I don't
need names in my log files.
That's easy:
log_fqdn off
So I don't think I _need_ DNS, but I
Schools net have disabled port 80 and I have to use the upstream proxy.
As far as I understand it I have to setup the upstream under cache-peer
and the type of parent.
To actually find out the settings I 'should' be able to pull the .pac
file and read it to find out the settings. Is there any
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 09:00, Ken Foskey wrote:
Schools net have disabled port 80 and I have to use the upstream proxy.
As far as I understand it I have to setup the upstream under cache-peer
and the type of parent.
To actually find out the settings I 'should' be able to pull the .pac
Hi all,
I am just installing 2.5 on a new proxy server (Deltacom Super Skinny) P4
1.6ghz 512MB RAM RH7.2
Am having two major problems:
1. Squid is giving a 'Network Unreachable' error for any URL that contains a
'?' see next line for log entry.
1033609694.017 17 10.192.1.14 TCP_MISS/503
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 13:55, Simon Bryan wrote:
Hi all,
I am just installing 2.5 on a new proxy server (Deltacom Super Skinny) P4
1.6ghz 512MB RAM RH7.2
Am having two major problems:
1. Squid is giving a 'Network Unreachable' error for any URL that contains a
'?' see next line for log
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
