WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU?

James wrote: >Which means utterly nothing to me. Once more, in English please? [ggg] 1) DON"T start a new thread each time you post. 2) DON'T use your Caps Lock key for Subject lines. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.o

Re: What happened to the form manager

Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 05/11/2009 04:21, MikeyG wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: /snip/ Apparently the Form History Control extension has been SeaMonkey 2.0 compatible since SeaMonkey 2.0a3. Form History Control 1.1.3

Re: SeaMonkey seems not to post to NNTP using auth

u...@domain.invalid wrote: chicagofan wrote: Did you see Gabrielle's message which said, her problems went away after she deleted her existing news account, and set it up again? Have you tried that? I have the same problem with my upgrade using news.ett.com.ua - and this is a test on news.moz

Seamonkey 2 as Default

I installed Seamonkey 2 in its own directory and left the 1.1.18 installation in place just in case. The profile imported with only a few minor problems with settings that have been mentioned in other threads. External programs that call for the default browser or e-mail program still open th

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

Leonidas Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: dominique wrote: OldCroc wrote: /snip/ I have it running on my MacBook Pro, but am holding off on updating any of my other machines. SM is my default browser on all of my Macs, but I'll be holding on to 1.1.18 on the other three for a

Re: Seamonkey 2 as Default

Cecil Bankston wrote: I installed Seamonkey 2 in its own directory and left the 1.1.18 installation in place just in case. The profile imported with only a few minor problems with settings that have been mentioned in other threads. External programs that call for the default browser or e-mail

Re: Seamonkey 2 as Default

Interviewed by CNN on 5/11/2009 17:49, Cecil Bankston told the world: > I installed Seamonkey 2 in its own directory and left the 1.1.18 > installation in place just in case. The profile imported with only a > few minor problems with settings that have been mentioned in other > threads. Extern

Re: TEXT PARTIALLY GRAY INSTEAD OF BLACK. WAS:

Daniel wrote: James, some people use signature blocks which contain their names, contact details, amusing quotes, whatever. These can be added, automatically, by telling SM where the sig file is. Then, at the end of the real message, SM adds a sig delimiter (a line consisting of two dashes f

Re: Can't get profile to Seamonkey2.0

William Morrison wrote: Ok, here's the deal. I'm running XP SP3 have a good working Seamonkey1.1.18 but can't get it's profile to migrate to 2.0 I've followed all the instructions but still no good. I've got my bookmarks moved over but can't import my mail settings, every time I try to import

Re: the Right click to open in a New Tab problem

dominique wrote: Daisy Zhao wrote, On 11/5/2009 11:39 AM: I'm a newbe to Seamonkey from firefox,and I'm satisfied with it in general. But what I hate most is every time I right click a link to open in a new tab,I just go direct to that page. Is it a way to stay at the current page and let the ne

Re: Stes that have Security Questions

Martin Freitag wrote: Whatever... afaik InternetExplorer doesn't have a FormManager like that at all, so this might be a Cookie issue instead? I think you're on the right track. If the page doesn't present a form to be filled, no form manager or password manager will respond. I suspect IE

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

OldCroc wrote: With all the problems that too many seasoned users, of SeaMonkey,are having, is it possible that the "Final" release of version 2.0 was released PREMATURELY?? Yes, there are many satisfied users, also, but there ARE too many who are NOT and the attitude of the developers should be

Re: Ping Lee

Leonidas Jones wrote: Lou wrote: Since I know you are active in TB and FF groups as well as SM... Will SM work fine on a Win7 netbook? FF / TB?? TIA Lou The fact that its a netbook should not cause a problem. I've got SM and FF up and running fine in Vista, so I would not anticipate any pr

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

Leonidas Jones wrote: Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better. Personaly if the SM 2 Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525601 is not solved SM2 is *not* better. _

Re: Seamonkey 2.0 Display Size

starrin schrieb: > Have 2 PCs, both now running 2.0, up from 1.1.18. on wide screens. > Vista machine came up fine. XP machine display of home page (My > Yahoo), or any bookmark sites I select, is gigantic. Same for its > bookmarks sidebar. I can Ctrl - - , and reduce font size, but can't > ma

Re: password exporter for 2.0?

Bill Davidsen schrieb: > I still work with people who want passwords and logins recorded in a > spreadsheet. I have a tool which will export to HTML, from which I can > (painfully) extract what is specified, but before I give up I'll ask > again, is there a *working* tool to save password manager d

Re: SM and Google Desktop Search

George Carden schrieb: > Well, I gave that a try and it still does not work. Google Desktop IS > indexing browser web pages content, but not e-mail. Sure would love to > get this problem solved. I know I'm not the only person having > difficulty with this, as others in various groups online have h

Re: SM and Google Desktop Search

Martin Freitag wrote: George Carden schrieb: Well, I gave that a try and it still does not work. Google Desktop IS indexing browser web pages content, but not e-mail. Sure would love to get this problem solved. I know I'm not the only person having difficulty with this, as others in various gro

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

Ray_Net wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better. Personaly if the SM 2 Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525601 is not solved SM2 is *not* better.

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

Ray_Net wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better. Personaly if the SM 2 Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525601 is not solved SM2 is *not* better.

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

Ray_Net wrote: > Leonidas Jones wrote: > >> Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is >> a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better. >> > Personaly if the SM 2 Bug > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525601 > > is not solved SM2 is

Re: Download Completes Box

David E. Ross wrote: Should not browser.download.manager.showAlertOnComplete be set to false when the checkbox is cleared? Exactly. ;-) See bug #526399 at. Fixed for the next nightlies and SM 2.0.1. Greetings, Jens -- Jens Hatlak

SM 2.0 personal toolbar strangeness...

Hi, Apologies if this has already been discussed & I've missed it - just joined this list and there is a lot of stuff.. Just upgraded to Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 SeaMonkey/2.0 on both my home & work PCs (winxp) on my home machin

SEAMONKEY 2.0 QUICK LAUNCH ICON SHORTCUT GONE

Could you please tell me what of the many features of the referenced page addresses my question? Thanks, James . . Message: 3 Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:26:30 -0800 From: NoOp To:support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: SEAMONKEY 2.0 QUICK LAUNCH ICON SHORTCUT GONE Message-ID: Content-Ty

Re: SEAMONKEY 2.0 QUICK LAUNCH ICON SHORTCUT GONE

I'm sure I'm using the incorrect name for what I'm trying to describe; maybe quick start? Anyway, I have a shortcut on my desktop to the 2.0 executable. I can drag this to a "quick launch" or "quick start" [or whatever it's called] bar that is just to the right of the "start" button at the bo

Cannot send mail with SM 2

When I try to send mail I get the following message: "Sending of message failed. An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server smtp.(etc). It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but you have chosen to use authentication. Uncheck 'Use name and password' for that se

Re: Cannot send mail with SM 2

Cedar wrote: When I try to send mail I get the following message: "Sending of message failed. An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server smtp.(etc). It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but you have chosen to use authentication. Uncheck 'Use name and password

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

OldCroc wrote: With all the problems that too many seasoned users, of SeaMonkey,are having, is it possible that the "Final" release of version 2.0 was released PREMATURELY?? Yes, there are many satisfied users, also, but there ARE too many who are NOT and the attitude of the developers should be

Re: What happened to the form manager

Philip Chee wrote: On 05/11/2009 04:21, MikeyG wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: In the particular page that you have information typed got to view menu Page info click on forms tab. Once its in there if you typed the information wrong its there forever. On the old forms manager you could actually

Re: Coral IETab now has support for Seamonkey 2.0

Robert Kaiser wrote: Cruz, Jaime wrote: I wrote to them, and they replied that they now have a version that supports Seamonkey 2.0. See http://coralietab.mozdev.org/installation.html I just hope they will place it on addons.mozilla.org as well, as most people search there and the internal "Ge

Re: What happened to the form manager

Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 05/11/2009 04:21, MikeyG wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: /snip/ Apparently the Form History Control extension has been SeaMonkey 2.0 compatible since SeaMonkey 2.0a3. Form History Control 1.1.3

Re: What happened to the form manager

Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 05/11/2009 04:21, MikeyG wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: /snip/ Apparently the Form History Control extension has been SeaMonkey 2.0 compatible since SeaMonkey 2.0a3. Form History Control 1.1.3

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

Ray_Net wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better. Personaly if the SM 2 Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525601 is not solved SM2 is *not* better. T

Re: Can't get profile to Seamonkey2.0

Ok, finally got 2.0 properly installed and profile transferred. But here's what I had to do to get it there. I went into My Computer to the proper directory where the profiles are stored used copy and paste to transfer contents of the named profile, the one the program was actually using even t

Re: What happened to the form manager

Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 05/11/2009 04:21, MikeyG wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: /snip/ Apparently the Form History Control extension has been SeaMonkey 2.0 compatible since SeaMonkey 2.0a3. Form History Control 1.1.3

Re: What happened to the form manager

Phillip Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 05/11/2009 04:21, MikeyG wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: In the particular page that you have information typed got to view menu Page info click on forms tab. Once its in there if you typed the information wrong its there forever. On the old forms manag

Re: Odd SM2 problems

Mr. Cheese wrote: Mr. Cheese wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Mr. Cheese wrote: - the toolbar for changing font sizes, adding emoticons, etc does not display when composing an email. I can't find a place to change this. - when I look at some old emails which are replies to emails the quoted email

Re: SEAMONKEY 2.0 QUICK LAUNCH ICON SHORTCUT GONE

On 11/05/2009 03:27 PM, James wrote: > Could you please tell me what of the many features of the referenced > page addresses my question? > > Thanks, > James Perhaps if you (and others) would actually take the time to *read* the words on the link I provided: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/rele

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

Ray_Net wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better. Personaly if the SM 2 Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525601 is not solved SM2 is *not* better. I

Re: the Right click to open in a New Tab problem

On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:02:29 +0800, Anonymous S. wrote: > SM2.0 default tabbed browsing behavior don't suit for me today. I can > not turn it smoothly with preferences or about:config, and lots of > things to make it more handy(e.g. more powerful session, tab behavior, > feed reader, download b

Re: Sites that have Security Questions

At one time I had a problem with the challenge questions; don't remember what it was now. Not being nearly so computer savvy as most of you I wound up dealing with my CU in trying to solve it. Eventually they suggested that I give the same answer for all the security questions [which would al

Re: Cannot send mail with SM 2

Cedar wrote: Cedar wrote: When I try to send mail I get the following message: "Sending of message failed. An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server smtp.(etc). It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but you have chosen to use authentication. Uncheck 'Use nam

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

Lance Courtland wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better. Personaly if the SM 2 Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525601 is not solved

FW: Error message encountered

_ From: Gonzalez, Darryl Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 6:48 PM To: 'support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org' Subject: Error message encountered Hello, first time poster: I am a Dell technical support representative. I've got a customer who is tryin

Re: Can't get profile to Seamonkey2.0

Actually it's Windows XP Home Edition Version 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 Build 2600 but if that translates to NT v5.1 who am I to argue, since I'm 58 and only have a high school education. Keith Whaley wrote: William Morrison wrote: Ok, finally got 2.0 properly installed and profile transferred.

Re: TEXT PARTIALLY GRAY INSTEAD OF BLACK. WAS:

Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:14:26 +1100 From: Daniel To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: TEXT PARTIALLY GRAY INSTEAD OF BLACK. WAS: Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed James wrote: > Which means utterly nothing to me. Once more, in Engli

WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU?

Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:07:50 -0800 (PST) From: JeffM To:support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Subject: WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU? Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 James wrote: >Which means utterly nothing to me. Once more, in English please? [ggg] 1) DO

Re: SM 2.0 personal toolbar strangeness...

Andrew Paxton wrote: Hi, Apologies if this has already been discussed & I've missed it - just joined this list and there is a lot of stuff.. Just upgraded to Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 SeaMonkey/2.0 on both my home & work PCs (win

Re: TEXT PARTIALLY GRAY INSTEAD OF BLACK. WAS:

Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:37:42 -0500 From: "Paul B. Gallagher" To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: TEXT PARTIALLY GRAY INSTEAD OF BLACK. WAS: Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Daniel wrote: > James, some people use signature blocks

Re: You really need to fix your posting, was Sites that have Security Questions

James wrote: James, The way you are posting is making it almost impossible to give you any consistent help. Every time you reply, it ends up in a different thread. We just cannot keep track of what you are asking about. We want to help, but this way, its very hard, and very frustrating to

Mail Inbox

Upgrade has failed to transfer a large mail inbox. Recovery? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: FW: Error message encountered

darryl_gonza...@dell.com wrote: _ From: Gonzalez, Darryl Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 6:48 PM To: 'support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org' Subject: Error message encountered Hello, first time poster: I am a Dell technical support representative.

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

Leonidas Jones wrote: Lance Courtland wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better. Personaly if the SM 2 Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id

was Can't get profile to Seamonkey2.0 now can't cut/copy--paste

Well it looks like I'm definitely going back to 1.1.18, I was just trying to write an email to someone and at first wanted to copy a web site address from 2.0 browser into the body of the letter and couldn't then after I manually typed it in I realized I should move it to earlier in the sentenc

Re: was Can't get profile to Seamonkey2.0 now can't cut/copy--paste

William Morrison wrote: Well it looks like I'm definitely going back to 1.1.18, I was just trying to write an email to someone and at first wanted to copy a web site address from 2.0 browser into the body of the letter and couldn't then after I manually typed it in I realized I should move it to

Re: TEXT PARTIALLY GRAY INSTEAD OF BLACK. WAS:

Hi, Paul. Please see comments below... Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:37:42 -0500 From: "Paul B. Gallagher" To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: TEXT PARTIALLY GRAY INSTEAD OF BLACK. WAS: Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Daniel wrote: >

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

Lance Courtland wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Lance Courtland wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better. Personaly if the SM 2 Bug https://bugzilla.moz

Re: SEAMONKEY 2.0 QUICK LAUNCH ICON SHORTCUT GONE

Message: 7 Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:15:53 -0800 From: NoOp To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: SEAMONKEY 2.0 QUICK LAUNCH ICON SHORTCUT GONE Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 11/05/2009 03:27 PM, James wrote: > Could you please tell me what of the ma

Re: was Can't get profile to Seamonkey2.0 now can't cut/copy--paste

Leonidas Jones wrote: William Morrison wrote: Well it looks like I'm definitely going back to 1.1.18, I was just trying to write an email to someone and at first wanted to copy a web site address from 2.0 browser into the body of the letter and couldn't then after I manually typed it in I realiz

Re: Mail Inbox

gordoncr wrote: Upgrade has failed to transfer a large mail inbox. Recovery? Lets be clear about what is happening. Too much information is usually better then not enough. You appear to be using Windows, but your headers do not make clear which version of Windows. It would be good to know

Re: Was SeaMonkey 2.0 really ready for release?

Leonidas Jones wrote: Lance Courtland wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Personally, I could not even imagine going back to SM 1.1.18. 2.0 is a fine product, different to be sure, but almost universally better. Personaly if the SM 2 Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id

Re: was Can't get profile to Seamonkey2.0 now can't cut/copy--paste

Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: William Morrison wrote: Well it looks like I'm definitely going back to 1.1.18, I was just trying to write an email to someone and at first wanted to copy a web site address from 2.0 browser into the body of the letter and couldn't then after I manuall

Re: What happened to the form manager

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 05/11/2009 04:21, MikeyG wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: /snip/ Apparently the Form History Control extension has been SeaMonkey 2.0 compatible since SeaMonkey 2.0a3. Form History Control 1.1.3

Re: was Can't get profile to Seamonkey2.0 now can't cut/copy--paste

Well I just tried safe mode and still the same and I'm not going through the hassle of setting up another profile and have mail split between two profiles I'm on over a hundred Groups on Yahoo and pretty much have mail coming in 24/7 and besides why should I have to do these extra steps just to

Re: What happened to the form manager

Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 05/11/2009 04:21, MikeyG wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: /snip/ Apparently the Form History Control extension has been SeaMonkey 2.0 compatible since SeaMonkey 2.0a3. Form History Co

Re: was Can't get profile to Seamonkey2.0 now can't cut/copy--paste

William Morrison wrote: Well I just tried safe mode and still the same and I'm not going through the hassle of setting up another profile and have mail split between two profiles I'm on over a hundred Groups on Yahoo and pretty much have mail coming in 24/7 and besides why should I have to do the

Re: was Can't get profile to Seamonkey2.0 now can't cut/copy--paste

Leonidas Jones wrote: William Morrison wrote: Well I just tried safe mode and still the same and I'm not going through the hassle of setting up another profile and have mail split between two profiles I'm on over a hundred Groups on Yahoo and pretty much have mail coming in 24/7 and besides wh

Re: What happened to the form manager

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On 05/11/2009 04:21, MikeyG wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: /snip/ Apparently the Form History Control extension has been SeaMonkey 2.0 compatible since SeaMonkey

Re: You really need to fix your posting, was Sites that have Security Questions

Leonidas Jones wrote: James wrote: James, The way you are posting is making it almost impossible to give you any consistent help. Every time you reply, it ends up in a different thread. We just cannot keep track of what you are asking about. We want to help, but this way, its very hard, and ve

Re: SEAMONKEY 2.0 QUICK LAUNCH ICON SHORTCUT GONE

> In-reply-to: Learn how to use the news.mozilla.org nntp server to read/respond on this newsgroup instead of using a listsrerv instead. Let me know and I'll be happy to help guide you through the process. . . First of all you may have already seen my post where I stated that I had the wron

Re: was Can't get profile to Seamonkey2.0 now can't cut/copy--paste

William Morrison wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: William Morrison wrote: /snip/ Leonidas Jones wrote: William Morrison wrote: Well it looks like I'm definitely going back to 1.1.18, I was just trying to write an email to someone and at first wanted to copy a web site address from 2.0 browser

Signature not on forwarded mail

Here's something I just noticed, when I compose new mail or reply to some my signature gets added to the end of the mail like it should but if I try to forward something the signature doesn't get added. Why? -- Big Bill Massillon, Oh USA 71 WheelHorse 800 Automatic http://groups.yahoo.com/group

Re: Transfer folders & included messages?

OldTimer wrote: Martin Feitag wrote: OldTimer schrieb: Martin Feitag wrote: Edward S. Kostyk schrieb: I am running Seamonkey 1.1.17 on Win XP Home SP 2. I have set up a new mail account (for my personal mail). I would like to transfer some folders (with their messages ) from the original acco

Re: You really need to fix your posting, was Sites that have Security Questions

James wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: James wrote: James, The way you are posting is making it almost impossible to give you any consistent help. Every time you reply, it ends up in a different thread. We just cannot keep track of what you are asking about. We want to help, but this way, its ver

Re: SEAMONKEY 2.0 QUICK LAUNCH ICON SHORTCUT GONE

James wrote: > In-reply-to: Learn how to use the news.mozilla.org nntp server to read/respond on this newsgroup instead of using a listsrerv instead. Let me know and I'll be happy to help guide you through the process. . . First of all you may have already seen my post where I stated that

Re: Signature not on forwarded mail

William Morrison wrote: Here's something I just noticed, when I compose new mail or reply to some my signature gets added to the end of the mail like it should but if I try to forward something the signature doesn't get added. Why? I don't really know, but you are correct, the sig is not attac

Re: Can't add more mail/news accounts in SM 2.0

Hartmut Figge wrote: Rex: Can someone help here? I can't configure any more accounts and it's really frustrating :( Did you searche the prefs.js for user_pref("mail.server.server8.valid", false);? The number behind server will probably be different. Hartmut Thanks, that worked. Shouldn't t

Re: Can't add more mail/news accounts in SM 2.0

Rex: >Hartmut Figge wrote: >> Did you searche the prefs.js for user_pref("mail.server.server8.valid", >> false);? The number behind server will probably be different. > >Thanks, that worked. Shouldn't this be reported as a bug? In the thread i mentioned is a comment from Jens who filed this bug.

Re: Cannot send mail with SM 2

chicagofan wrote: Cedar wrote: Cedar wrote: When I try to send mail I get the following message: "Sending of message failed. An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server smtp.(etc). It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but you have chosen to use authenticatio

Re: SeaMonkey seems not to post to NNTP using auth

chicagofan wrote: u...@domain.invalid wrote: chicagofan wrote: Did you see Gabrielle's message which said, her problems went away after she deleted her existing news account, and set it up again? Have you tried that? I have the same problem with my upgrade using news.ett.com.ua - and this is