Re: Goodbye SymPy

2008-12-02 Thread Kirill Smelkov
Vinzent, All, On 30 нояб, 21:10, Vinzent Steinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kirill, would you care if we would release sympy (including quite a lot of your work) to Public Domain without asking you? I would not mind because for me Public Domain is very close to BSD. For asking you when

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Goodbye SymPy

2008-11-29 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:45:29PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Goodbye SymPy

2008-11-29 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On 30 нояб, 00:38, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/11/29 Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 29 нояб, 23:40, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:45:29PM +0100

Re: Goodbye SymPy

2008-11-29 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On 30 нояб, 01:57, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/11/29 Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 30 нояб, 00:38, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/11/29 Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 29 нояб, 23:40, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2008

Re: Goodbye SymPy

2008-11-29 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On 30 нояб, 03:01, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/11/30 Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 30 нояб, 01:57, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/11/29 Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 30 нояб, 00:38, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/11/29 Kirill

[sympy] Re: bsd vs lgpl -- decision

2008-11-21 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 01:55:25AM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Jim Jewett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Just a bit of history; I am explicitly abstaining on which license is best.] On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED

[sympy] Thanks to all of you!!!

2008-11-21 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 02:15:22PM +0100, Abderrahim KITOUNI wrote: Hi everyone, it's been a long time, I was following the project but didn't have time to contribute. 2008/11/16 Riccardo Gori [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sunday 16 November 2008 15:02:44 Kirill Smelkov wrote: [...] Guys

[sympy] Re: bsd vs lgpl -- decision

2008-11-18 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:42:47PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, thanks everyone for the discussion about the licences. After valuing all the arguments for and against LGPL, I am making a decisions, that: SymPy is going to stay *BSD* And as long as I am going to do all the releases

[sympy] Re: Yes, SymPy should be LGPL! (please help)

2008-11-16 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 07:15:53PM -0600, Robert Kern wrote: On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 18:07, Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: EPD can ship LGPL - I'm not sure who is telling you that we can't. It's just not true. We can and do ship LGPL and some GPLed packages

[sympy] Re: should sympy be LGPL?

2008-11-16 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 01:08:41PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote: Another thing is LGPL *is* very widely depolyed and is non-intrusive (e.g. on Linux systems, the _basic_ library GLibc is covered by LGPL, though any software can use and uses it -- Python (BSD), protprietary applications... *any

[sympy] Re: should sympy be LGPL?

2008-11-16 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 05:22:25PM -0800, Brian Granger wrote: I am almost a sympy developer (my recent work has not been merged yet). I also don't know much about the history Kirr's contributions, so I apologize if I say anything (unintentionally) to hurt already sour relations. So...

[sympy] Re: should sympy be LGPL?

2008-11-16 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 01:58:29PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: I am all for Fair use of SymPy, as an informal way of saying that it is (at least) polite to for example cite us and consider contributing the changes back, because in the end, it helps everyone. But the BSD license covers

[sympy] Re: [sage-devel] Yes, SymPy should be LGPL! (please help)

2008-11-16 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 01:36:30PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi Kirr, let me say that I am not convinced that LGPL is better for SymPy. It seems to me that you think that LGPL will protect you 100% and keep you happy: Initially I was in a shape and could afford myself working on

[sympy] Re: [sage-devel] Yes, SymPy should be LGPL! (please help)

2008-11-16 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:57:29PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi Kirr, Well, read this post: http://www.miriamruiz.es/weblog/?p=192 so the answer is yes and no. Which means AGPL is on the edge between free and non-free, as viewed by many people around Debian. I definitely want

[sympy] Re: [sage-devel] Yes, SymPy should be LGPL! (please help)

2008-11-16 Thread Kirill Smelkov
Brian, On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 10:14:39AM -0800, Brian Granger wrote: Brian email: do you mean that it is difficult to understand legal wording? Hm, yes, legal texts are difficult, but LGPL is with us for ~ 15 years already, and I personally always thought that there is a clear

[sympy] Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix Mul._eval_subs

2008-10-06 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:19:37PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: This patch also looks good to me. Thanks. Kirill, any objections to pushing both patches in? I'm very tired to study those patches, but if they look good to at least one other developer (and you've already approved them), there

[sympy] Re: high school factoring

2008-07-21 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 08:12:42PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, when I was at high school I remember figuring out how to factor this: In [1]: 2*x*y*z + x*y**2 + x*z**2 + y*x**2 + y*z**2 + z*x**2 + z*y**2 Out[1]: 2 2 2 2 2 2 2*x*y*z + x*y + x*z

[sympy] Re: how to install tcc library without root privileges

2008-07-09 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 09:04:08PM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote: Hi Ondrej, All, On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 03:47:59PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, thanks to Vinzent Steinberg we can now use tcc to automatically convert a mathematical formula in SymPy (sympy.org) to C, compile

[sympy] Re: __str__ and __repr__ confusion

2008-06-29 Thread Kirill Smelkov
or scipy2008, so that we can fix this together? It be awesome. :) All students here, please apply for sponsorship to scipy2008, so that enthought has some good students to choose from and that we can hack on sympy at Caltech.:) Ondrej On 6/27/08, Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri

[sympy] Re: __str__ and __repr__ confusion

2008-06-27 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 08:53:07AM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 05:30:29AM -0700, Pearu Peterson wrote: On Jun 20, 11:42 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, let's get

[sympy] Re: __str__ and __repr__ confusion

2008-06-27 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:16:18PM +0200, Fredrik Johansson wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I quote http://docs.python.org/ref/customization.html#l2h-183 __repr__(self): Called by the repr() built-in function and by string

[sympy] Re: __str__ and __repr__ confusion

2008-06-26 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 05:30:29AM -0700, Pearu Peterson wrote: On Jun 20, 11:42 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, let's get rid of set_repr_level()? This is quite an important change, so I'd like to hear opinions of others as well. We already had this discussion

[sympy] Re: __str__ and __repr__ confusion

2008-06-20 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:00:09PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Riccardo Gori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 20 June 2008 10:31:15 Ondrej Certik wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Riccardo Gori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm working at

[sympy] Re: how to use SymPy from Windows

2008-06-20 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 03:29:58AM +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote: On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 01:35:50AM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: I finally found time to install virtualbox on my Debian and windows + ubuntu images on it. I figured all that out all ready, but I am stuck at one problem: how

[sympy] Re: Productive coding, or What is your work flow?

2008-06-19 Thread Kirill Smelkov
Hi Brian, All, On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 04:52:34PM -0600, Brian Jorgensen wrote: For years, I've been hearing that effective text editing is essential to productive coding, but I'd never really taken the time to move beyond Notepad++, Text Mate, and gedit. I've recently started using vim, and

[sympy] Re: idea for sympy.org webpage

2008-05-24 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:44:19AM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 04:54:52PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Vinzent Steinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

[sympy] Re: prefix [sympy] in our list

2008-05-09 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 10:34:16AM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Abderrahim Kitouni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't like this, as it takes some space from the subject. Doing the same as all other mailinglists doesn't seem a good reason. One can even

Re: Issue 93 in sympy: Square root denesting

2008-04-23 Thread Kirill Smelkov
Hi Jurjen, On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 12:13:22PM +0200, Jurjen N.E. Bos wrote: Op 19-apr-2008, om 18:58 heeft [EMAIL PROTECTED] het volgende geschreven: Issue 93: Square root denesting http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=93 Comment #11 by kirill.smelkov: At present we

Re: how to rebase MQ patches

2008-04-23 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:38:48AM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, there was a question in: http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=608#c7 about how to rebase the MQ patches to the latest tip: --- I just tried to submit 4 patches (fix of #608, capital gamma function,

Re: google code hosting broken again

2008-04-18 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:26:16PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 01:32:14PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: [...] You can download sympy from Debian: http

Re: cookbook for partial differential equation manipulation: questions/bug?

2008-04-18 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:55:11PM +0200, Friedrich Hagedorn wrote: On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:36:40PM -0700, d wrote: just some basic follow-up: (1) regarding the subscripting: (1a) Ondrej's output on my browser is: In [5]: Symbol(F_x) Out[5]: Fₓ Thats nice, but In

Re: Reverse the subs

2008-04-18 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:45:57PM +0200, Friedrich Hagedorn wrote: On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 03:09:39PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Friedrich Hagedorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I think this should be done in the reverse order:

Re: pPrint an equation

2008-04-17 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:32:19AM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Friedrich Hagedorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:56:21PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: In [1]: Eq(z, ==, x/y) Out[1]: x z = ─ y

Re: pPrint an equation

2008-04-17 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 03:24:33PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Fredrik Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why does it make sense to cover all equalities and inequalities by this one operator Eq? The present syntax is to me like spelling x*y+z as

Re: See the revision in the installed module

2008-04-17 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 03:40:27PM +0200, Friedrich Hagedorn wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 03:28:10PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Friedrich Hagedorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, is there a variable to see the revision in the installed

Re: cookbook for partial differential equation manipulation: questions/bug?

2008-04-17 Thread Kirill Smelkov
Hi fred2 (what is your name, btw)! On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:36:46PM -0700, fred2 wrote: Hello sympy experts, I'm not an expert, but I'll try to answer some questions. Thanks for making sympy available. it looks like a great package. i figured i would put together a cookbook page for

Let's discuss plain ascii-art parens

2008-04-15 Thread Kirill Smelkov
Hi, When unicode is available, we draw things nicely In [1]: sin(x/y) Out[1]: ⎛x⎞ sin⎜─⎟ ⎝y⎠ In [2]: (x/y, x**2, 1) Out[2]: ⎛x 2 ⎞ ⎜─, x , 1⎟ ⎝y ⎠ In [3]: [x/y, x**2, 1] Out[3]: ⎡x 2 ⎤ ⎢─, x , 1⎥ ⎣y ⎦ But recently an issue arose about how best is it to draw

Re: unicode and symbols

2008-03-30 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 05:07:04PM -0400, Alan Bromborsky wrote: Kirill Smelkov wrote: Hi Alan, On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 02:58:56PM -0400, Alan Bromborsky wrote: Kirill Smelkov wrote: Hi Alan, On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 02:28:48PM -0400, Alan Bromborsky wrote

Re: unicode and symbols

2008-03-30 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 05:25:00PM -0400, Alan Bromborsky wrote: Alan Bromborsky wrote: Kirill Smelkov wrote: Hi Alan, On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 02:58:56PM -0400, Alan Bromborsky wrote: Kirill Smelkov wrote: Hi Alan, On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 02:28

Re: code review program

2008-01-22 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 10:04:28AM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, Kirill has found this nice program http://review-board.org/ It was mentioned in the last thursday Linux Weekly News (lwn.net) issue. for doing patch reviews online. The project looks cool, and I am all for trying it.

Re: Use real numbers only

2008-01-21 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:03:30AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: hg parents changeset: 1704:75067997d489 tag: tip user:Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] date:Sat Jan 19 02:38:47 2008 +0300 summary: Or Dvory added to credits hg updated I tried clean, I even

Re: Use real numbers only

2008-01-21 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:41:50AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: I did: sudo rm -rf /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sympy rm -rf sympy (my hg clone) hg clone http://hg.sympy.org/sympy/ cd sympy python setup.py build sudo python setup.py install python Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Oct 30

Re: is_real for cos

2008-01-20 Thread Kirill Smelkov
Hi Adh, On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 03:20:36PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In [15]: x, y, z = symbols('xyz', real=True) In [16]: exp(I*x).expand(complex=True) Out[16]: I*sin(x) + cos(x) In [17]: re(_) Out[17]: re(cos(x)) In [18]: im(__) Out[18]: im(cos(x)) + sin(x) Obviously

Re: How to factor out

2008-01-19 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 09:01:05PM +0100, Friedrich Hagedorn wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:15:49PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Jan 17, 2008 2:50 PM, Friedrich Hagedorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, how can do like this: x + x**2 == x*(1 + x) ? In

Re: Conventions

2008-01-01 Thread Kirill Smelkov
Alan, thanks for your interest to SymPy! On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 03:16:14PM -0500, Alan Bromborsky wrote: If I want to submit a python module for sympy what conventions (programming, documenting, etc.) should I adhere to? It is good to first discuss your ideas / code in the issues:

Re: issues priority

2008-01-01 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 02:50:13PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, google now for some time allows to sort the issues as we want, so if you go to: http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/list the first issues are the ones with a milestone set, the rest is sorted according to a

Re: issues priority

2008-01-01 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 05:04:06PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote: On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 02:50:13PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, google now for some time allows to sort the issues as we want, so if you go to: http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/list the first issues

Re: Source code issue

2007-12-27 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 11:25:11PM +0530, Goutham D L wrote: The __call__ method for the core.basic.Basic class has 2 return statements *return Basic.Function(self[0])(*args) print self, args return Basic.Apply(self, *args) *Can someone explain whats going on here? Unfortunately it's an

Re: Making approximation to symplify lengthy expressions

2007-12-11 Thread Kirill Smelkov
Suresh, On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:47:58AM -0800, Suresh Jeevanandam wrote: Dear all, Let's say I have an expression: 1/(a+b) I want to be able to simplify this to 1/a if we know that a is much, much greater than b. Is there a way to achieve this already in sympy. If not, I think

Re: Using typical values,ranges for symbols

2007-12-11 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:25:30AM -0800, Suresh Jeevanandam wrote: Dear all, I want to propose these features. The symbols must include these informations as well, these would be optional while symbol creation. 1) typical range 2) typical value ( the symbol would take a value around

Re: patch mercurial to send both inline+attachement patch for review

2007-12-10 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 01:30:57PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, when reviewing patches, sometimes I want to download them and test them (I download the attachement), but first I just want to look at the code, without testing it - so I'd prefer if mercurial sent both inline and

Re: patch

2007-11-26 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 08:35:17PM +0530, Goutham D L wrote: *Commited. BTW next time, could you please tell you hg to include your full name and email? * sure. Is there a way to send the patches directly using hg? Use patchbomb extension:

Re: removing the sympy-oldcore branch?

2007-11-26 Thread Kirill Smelkov
Hi, On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 03:55:21PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, how about removing the sympy-oldcore branch from the official repository: http://hg.sympy.org/sympy/ I think sympy-oldcore should be left inplace, read below. and creating for example a new sympy-oldcore

Re: Writing the core in C++

2007-11-12 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 04:24:44PM +, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, I know one student, that would be interested in writing the core in C++ as part of his Bachelor thesis (I could be his advisor). His current code is here: http://code.google.com/p/sympy-cpp/ (sorry the page is in

Re: live Mercurial SymPy mirror is up and running

2007-10-19 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:05:56PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: P.S. I saw hgsvn already -- it could be interesting becuase of unofficial hgpushsvn.py script. Yep. I have a private svn repository with some things I am doing (like articles I am writing). So I followed:

Re: live Mercurial SymPy mirror is up and running

2007-10-19 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 03:22:30PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: On 10/17/07, Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bill, On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:58:03PM -0400, Bill Page wrote: On 10/17/07, Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: /// Yes, this repositories

Re: live Mercurial SymPy mirror is up and running

2007-10-17 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 06:46:52PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: It is suppossed to reduce mirroring latency, right? Exactly. Let's try it. Could you please tell me how to make that some script is run when CIA feed is updated? I'm going to concentrate on the listed-below issues, and

Re: live Mercurial SymPy mirror is up and running

2007-10-17 Thread Kirill Smelkov
Bill, On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:58:03PM -0400, Bill Page wrote: On 10/17/07, Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: /// Yes, this repositories are readonly -- we can't commit to them. This is because only svn - hg mirroring works at present. Setting up automatic hg - svn mirroring

live Mercurial SymPy mirror is up and running

2007-10-16 Thread Kirill Smelkov
Hi All, Just to let you know: I've managed to setup live mercurial mirrors for both SymPy and MPMATH projects. They are located here: http://landau.phys.spbu.ru/~kirr/cgi-bin/hg.cgi/sympy--hg/ http://landau.phys.spbu.ru/~kirr/cgi-bin/hg.cgi/mpmath--hg/ Mirrors are synced to main repositories