9pm EDT sound? I’m open to alternative
> times, if you’re interested in joining you get to help decide when we’ll do
> it :)
next thursday as in the 21st or the 28th? i'm going to be on my flight
to IETF on the 21st but back on the 28th if the airlines cooperate.
richard
--
rwe...@averi
e being very fair-minded and, mindful of Mikel's
previous comments about them editorialising the news, decided to
editorialise this one in his favour for once. ;)
cheers
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html
be
better coming from, you know, someone on the same continent.
cheers
Richard
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On 3/3/19 1:06 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 03/03/2019 16:09, Richard Welty wrote:
>> what can/should we be doing about this sort of stuff? i'm really
>> at a bit of a loss here.
>>
> Aside from the excellent technical suggestion that's already been made,
> I'd
things that
were wrong in 2007 when we took in the TIGER data.
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
Java - Web Applications - Search
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@op
data is not sufficiently
reliable. but i don't know for sure if he'll even see the message.
what can/should we be doing about this sort of stuff? i'm really
at a bit of a loss here.
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
OpenStreetMap - Postgr
ss explains
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Community_Guidelines/How_We_Create_Community_Guidelines),
such guidelines can be proposed by the community (no kidding, Sherlock). By
starting the discussion here, we can begin to ascertain what the community
would want to see in a Community Guide
as never really broken through. Let's talk about it openly,
honestly and respectfully and get it sorted out for the benefit of both
mappers and data consumers.
cheers
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
.
Solle man solche Fälle mit fee=yes+fee:disabled=no bzw mit der conditional
Variante
fee:conditional=yes + fee:conditional=no @ disabled;
mappen?
Richard
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
not entirely convinced post towns help Royal Mail in any case,
given the amount of mail mistakenly delivered to us that is actually meant
for Mr G--- at 11 Market Street, Chipping Norton...)
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/
ag addresses in Charlbury with "addr:city=Chipping
Norton", a town 6 miles away, just because one private delivery operator[1]
uses Chipping Norton as an optional part of their addressing is... one of
the more outlandish ideas I've heard in OSM tagging circles, and that's
saying a lot.
Richard
[1]
ren features (Zebrastreifen) nicht unbekannt.. wo das
Problem offenbar völlig ignoriert wird.
Alternativ geht straße+bicycle=no + radweg=bicycle=yes/designated.
Oder wir ignorieren das einfach mal. Wenn der Radweg ohnehin neben der
Straße ist kann das Routing nicht
ten ist, und eine Straße bei der ein Radweg angeordnet
> ist nicht mehr voneinander unterscheiden.
wenn der Radweg verpflichtend ist, ist die Straße de facto verboten?
Wenn Radweg nur in eine Richtung geht wäre die Straße dann
oneway für bicycle.
Richard
Radwege
> zu kennzeichnen, so dass für die benutzungspflichtigen Radwege nur
> "designated" übrig bleibt.
eigentlich ist nicht der Radweg bunutzungspflichtig sondern die Straße
bicycle=no
Und soviel ich weiß wurden die Regeln für "benutzungsp
tps://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/business-and-government/help-and-support/navigation-technology/os-net/formats-for-developers.html
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f5372682.html
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.
analog
> behandelt.
also, path ist schon mal definiert - kann man nicht einfach nach belieben
neudefinieren.
Richard
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
of it?
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Mathias Vadot a écrit:
> Après plusieurs test, je me rends compte que le fond de carte
> OCM n’affiche pas les itinéraires internationaux, relations
> taguées de cette manière : network = icn.
https://cycle.travel/map
:)
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/France
name here in Charlbury and then post a letter to it,
Carla the post-lady will ask around until she finds out where the street is
(or until she sees the sign you've erected), and then she'll deliver you the
letter. A working postcode will speed the process up but isn't absolutely
necessary.
Richard
eers
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
(For Lime Street you'd probably want the high-level station as
network=National Rail, the low-level as Merseyrail; for other stations where
non-Merseyrail services also call, you might want semicolon-separated
values.)
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f537
g or another online slippy map with minutely
updates, but not for anyone using offline maps, sites with less frequent
updates, and so on.
cheers
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/USA-f5284732.html
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@opens
n haben, zum offiziellen küren lassen. Dass
> so Konzerne und Vermessungsämter sowie Firmen, die Kontrolle über OSM
> innehaben, ist die Folge.
wie äussert sich das denn? Es gilt immer noch any tag you like, jeder kann
mappen fast wie er will und die Daten sind unter einer bekannten Lizenz
ve
lesen will?
Am allerwenigsten irgendwelche unbelehrbaren Trolle und ideologischen
Streithänsel.
Wo es keine Vernunft gibt bringt auch ein CoC nichts.
Richard
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
's some way of discerning that, I'm
happy.
cheers
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/USA-f5284732.html
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
eviewed=no, or
something).
cheers
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/USA-f5284732.html
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 10:05:40AM +0700, Bui Quang Hung wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to upload a picture from OSM Contributor (Mobile App) but I do
> not know how to do.
more details please, it is difficult to understand what you are trying to
eetmap.org/wiki/Merkaartor ?
Vespucci?
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
hat's not what
> From: says) and so uses OSM's SPF correctly.
interesting, my gmail inbox has 11788 OSM mails and only 39 in the spam
folder, out of those one false positive.
Richard
pgpIcO1SqSRo_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
talk mailing lis
Bonjour,
La question que je me suis posé en voyant ça, c'est comment tagger ça dans OSM?
ça a déjà été fait pour Lyon (visiblement Métropole et Département chacun en
admin_level=6, plus une "circonscription départementale" en admin_level=5).
Continuer sur le même principe me paraîtrait
ing lists and not seeing this problem,
at least not with a gmail account.
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
9.html
but is this the "offending" message?
The messages go straight into a dedicated gmail inbox without any
filters.
As far as I know gmail will only ever reject messages that contain
what looks to it like executable programs - attached files
(*.exe, *.com,
streetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q104
> Tag:bridge:movable=bascule: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q888
how do I get at other language's versions, and how do I get easily at the
original source of the information (description text) to fix it?
Richard
___
ther it matches our personal views or not.
Whoa. Nope.
There is no precedent in OSM for local chapters dictating what can be mapped
in a country. None. The Local Chapters agreement
(https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Local_Chapters/Template_agreement)
doesn't admit any such possibility.
Richard
r, and nicer, place
if people went out and did mapping, rather than staying at home and doing
deleting. I might have said that before.[4]
Richard
[1] Though legally it's a unitary district council with the faintly
hilarious title of "Rutland County Council District Council"... go figure
Bonjour,
A mon avis, seul les contributeurs locaux peuvent statuer sur chaque cas.
Le cas d'Ancenis est assez typique. C'est LA grande ville entre Nantes et
Angers pour les gens du coin. La plupart des gens un peu plus éloignés croient
souvent qu'il y a au moins le double d'habitants, vu le
s uralte Ferrata Proposal um die
relation type=route + route=ferrata zu ergänzen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/via_ferrata#Tagging_as_ferrata_relation
Richard
___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
uction
at WDW in Orlando up to date - it was just that the GPS app wasn't
pulling new maps frequently enough to keep up with reality.
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
Java
d does it: the ref= tag is for signposted references. See
how https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref#Examples_on_ways refers to
"on the ground", "on the signs", "the usage on the signs".
Richard
[1] Personally, I honestly don't mind whether it's unsig
terated to KDDA one minute
previously), was not included in this edit; and therefore was not germane to
the discussion of this edit. I'd therefore ask that you please withdraw your
accusation of being insensitive.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Br
ussion (beginning with
comments on any offending changesets) if edits were being made contrary to
the wishes of the community there, rather than derailing a discussion about
a tag change in Great Britain.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f537268
res
a map on which C-road refs are displayed (and I recognise you from the SABRE
forums, so I guess that might be the case ;) ) I'd be more than happy to
help you and/or others set up a server to do that. I'm sure there are other
people here who'd extend the same offer of help.
Richard
--
Sent from: h
Rand McNally are as well.
"don't tag for the renderer" - but we lose sight of the fact that there are
multiple renderers, and non-renderer data consumers on top of that.
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linu
80695939).
I reckon this thread is consensus enough and I'm sure Simon can indulge us
on this one little thing if we promise to uncockup some editor presets in
return. :)
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html
ly three doors away from each other
- one Midcounties, one Co-operative Group (ex-Somerfield).
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f5372682.html
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetma
e.coop/storefinder
Channel Islands: https://www.channelislands.coop/je/opening-hours/
East of England are selling theirs:
https://www.thenews.coop/128610/topic/business/east-england-co-op-sell-off-pharmacy-opticians-businesses/
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f537268
pharmacies. I
haven't investigated further.)
cheers
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f5372682.html
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
oesn't work like that.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f5372682.html
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Martin Wynne wrote:
> Worcestershire County Council publishes PDF text lists (no mapping)
> of classified and unclassified roads.
Google publishes a map, but that doesn't mean it's an admissible source for
OSM. :)
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f5
think of a location in mainland GB where
tertiary/unclassified/residential roads _should_ have a (non-A/B[1]) ref?
Milton Keynes has its (signposted) H and V numbers for Horizontal/Vertical,
but other than that I can't remember any.
Richard
[1] there is the very occasional example of a tertiary A road, n
inally wrote "Note I didn't include Northern Ireland" so I'm not
quite sure what your issue is here. C road numbers are not public-facing in
mainland GB and this edit refers to mainland GB only.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great
to sell you.
This is long overdue. Thank you, Dave.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f5372682.html
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
ig and empty. But, and you'll excuse
me stating the blindingly obvious, the thing about empty areas is that
there's not much there to map. The TIGER A41 issue continues to be a running
sore but, by and large, this can be (and is being) armchaired.
Richard
[1] other than issues with so
where wiki
documentation differs wildly from real-world mapping practice (there are a
couple of notorious examples around access which I won't bore you with
here).
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html
t's not even infeasible that, one day, individual OSM
users could save their own stylesheets somewhere on osm.org, fork and share
them with others. The possibilities are endless, and endlessly delightful.
That is where to focus our energies - not on mithering around the dying
technology of ras
t were the same.
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/19609/saint-or-st-is-there-an-official-osm-policy
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Australia-f5416966.html
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
ty extents are the only new data being released as OGL for now,
with the possibility of UPRN/USRN data later on.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f5372682.html
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
searching for these
> lost paths.
I experimented with something like that earlier this year:
https://twitter.com/richardf/status/948578070692290560
Would be great to do it properly but I'm pushed for time at the moment.
cheers
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n
hat tiger:reviewed is often now worthless.)
cheers
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/USA-f5284732.html
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
tivity, location, classification, surface.)
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
Java - Web Applications - Search
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap
Rob Nickerson wrote:
> Basically we have point data of historic footpaths (some 300k points) and
> I think it would be amazing to compare this to OSM to see if we can find
> more footpaths to map.
Very cool. Could you post the data somewhere?
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis
obvious typos...)
So back to my original questions: The only way to find a new valid
tag value is to wait for a user to complain about a funky or lack of
calculated route?
Richard
On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Mateusz Konieczny
<matkoni...@tutanota.com> wrote:
> 5. May 2018 18:07 by wi
p_Features page?
Is there any way to find out about new additions to avoid future
'surprises' like this?
Looking at the maps (and not knowing the two locations), the corridor
tagging looks reasonable.
Regards,
Richard Marsden
Winwaed Software Technology LLC
https://www.w
early the way to go.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f5372682.html
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
e:
> This language=en tag would be placed on a administrative
> relation, right?
If I read Frederik's proposal right, the language=en tag would be placed on
the object with the name tag, though putting it on admin relations is an
interesting idea.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.193
with a
roller. The second is probably =fine_gravel, perhaps =compacted. I'd ignore
the wiki because the wiki, to borrow a phrase, sucks rocks.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/USA-f5284732.html
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-
visitor from across the pond, but there are some smart and talented
people on this list who I'm sure could make a good job of it, and I'd be
happy to help if needed.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/USA-f5284732.html
___
Talk-us mailing l
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 01:51:54AM -0300, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
> El 18 mar. 2018, a la(s) 20:50, François Lacombe <fl.infosrese...@gmail.com>
> escribió:
>
> >
> > 2018-03-19 0:38 GMT+01:00 Michael Kugelmann <michaelk_...@gmx.de>:
> >&g
have any use for separate mapping and wiki
accounts.
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 01:35:41PM +, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 05/03/2018 11:49, Richard wrote:
> >this one problem could be (somewhat) solved by conditional restrictions,
>
> No, this is not an access restriction - people are allowed to go there
> whenever they l
ing it for political
or ideological reasons.
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
dfills, busy roads and many other features will allow
someone to draw conclusions about the socioeconomic status of the
Area. Most of the time you can deduce income status purely by
the geometry of houses and roads.
Richard
___
talk mailing lis
/wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
Not that any routing engine I am aware of would understand those.
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
e/
cheers
Richard
___
OSRM-talk mailing list
OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
percentage of the road network in the corn belt of the US
consists of very well maintained gravel surfaced roads. they are absolutely
not tracks and routinely support heavy farm equipment.
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consultin
y contrast, cycle.travel (using OSM
data) gets it pretty much right: occasionally it takes a gravel road
unnecessarily but it's pretty much always rideable.
It would be great if we could become the best map of the rural US just as we
are for much of the rest of the world.
cheers
Richard
--
Sent from:
The previous ESRI imagery has just been restored to the imagery list (by
ESRI, so 100% legit) under the name “Clarity”.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/USA-f5284732.html
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https
a plan for a NYS address points import
(hopefully with building
footprints) and so i'm in a somewhat similar place right now.
richard
On 1/8/18 7:54 PM, Russell Meier wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
>
>
> I am new to the idea of discussing additions to OSM and like to do my
> best to
ne access überschreiben,
> m.E. also vermutlich falsch getaggt.
in der Realität ist access=agricultural immer ein öffentlicher Weg weil
er sonst als private gemappt werden solle und für öffentliche Wege gilt
implizit foot=yes ausser wenn es explizit verboten wäre.
Richard
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Bonjour,
Une de plus pour la liste:
http://www.loire-atlantique.gouv.fr/Politiques-publiques/Relations-avec-les-collectivites-territoriales/Actualites/Vallons-de-l-Erdre-une-7e-commune-nouvelle-en-Loire-Atlantique
L'arrêté préfectoral date d'hier. Il apparaitra peut-être au JO demain...
t. (Of course,
such deduction may be prohibited by contract - as with Google Street View -
but Geograph's terms make no such restriction.)
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f5372682.html
___
Talk-GB mailing
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 04:21:37PM +, John Karr wrote:
Hi,
somewhat sidelining the issue, you can always add key:ele which should
circumvent
most pittfalls as long as it is present on all interesting objects.
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk
hough I'm no Java expert and may have missed something.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f5372682.html
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 12/7/17 6:42 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
> Follow up - i received no reply from the mapper in question (message
> sent on 29 November), so i sent him a followup indicating i was starting
> to make the changes and have started working on it. i will fix the two that
> i'm aware
to fix the rest. if it becomes a bulk edit, i will consult
with
the necessary folks as required.
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
Java - Web Applications - Se
id 2000s dataset. the
newer TIGER
boundary data is generally much improved. however, doing boundary work is
a bit involved, involving converting the TIGER data into something more
useful
for OSM, and then getting the relations right. it's fairly fussy and
detailed work.
i've done a
On 11/29/17 10:36 PM, Evin Fairchild wrote:
> These unsigned reference route numbers probably should use the
> unsigned_ref=* tag. Seems like the best compromise.
that's what i intend to do if i need to go in and clean this up.
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking
the map by putting these numbers in the ref tags.
they don't belong there.
for anyone who cares, the entire list of these numbers appears here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_reference_routes_in_New_York
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consul
password is useless for 97% of users and should cease to
exist. Where some authentication to the list server is needed send
a link or code via email or more secure methods.
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
ernational language as our mother tongue could,
perhaps, be more forgiving of those who weren't.
Richard
[1] http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/11/wochennotiz-nr-382/
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html
__
. But
don’t let that stop you with your ever entertaining amateur hour.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
her than trying to
impose behaviours from elsewhere.
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5171242.html
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
could no doubt advise further.
If done right, I'd hope this could be the spur to greatly improving OSM POI
coverage in the US.
cheers
Richard
[1] yes yes, well spotted. http://www.cityofpotlatch.org/
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/USA-f528473
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 10:13:54PM +0900, Max wrote:
> On 2017년 11월 06일 20:19, Richard wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 09:11:34PM +0100, Markus wrote:
> >
> >>4. Wenn jemand lokale Namen in anderen Schriftsystemen abbildet,
> >>damit Menschen die die ursprüng
ode gibt und jemanden der die name:XXX Einträge vernünftig pflegen will
würde ich nichts dagegen haben. Man sollte aber schon einige Kriterien haben,
daß nicht für jede Sprache einfach Phantasienamen erfunden werden.. Klingonische
Karten sollten m.E. lieber auf einem außerirdischen Server gepflegt werden.
uch überlegen Peking ins alt_name:de zu schieben.
Wie ist das mit dem Endonym Beijing - das steht nunmal in 15 Varianten da.
Irgendwie
müßte man markieren welche jetzt die im deutschen Sprachraum gebräuchliche ist
- ohne
die Information zu verlieren aus w
as nicht mag, kann die wenigen Karten, die name:de oder auch name:hsb
> auswerten, einfach meiden.
vielleicht sollte es im Gegenteil mehr Karten geben die auch (evtl
konfigurierbar)
old_name u.Ä. anzeigen? Dann wären historisch interessierte mapper nicht
ermutigt
historische aber nich
rreicher wird die Ache vermutlich
immer noch Ache nennen auch hinter der Grenze (ich meine jetzt die welche von
Achenkirch in den Sylvensteiner Speicher fließt). Ganz zu schweigen von der
Stelle wo es das Grenzflüßschen ist und jede Hälfte anders heißen würde.
Richard
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
g/wiki/Potlatch_2/merging_functionality
Richard
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Great-Britain-f5372682.html
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 10:13:54PM +0900, Max wrote:
> On 2017년 11월 06일 20:19, Richard wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 09:11:34PM +0100, Markus wrote:
> >
> >>4. Wenn jemand lokale Namen in anderen Schriftsystemen abbildet,
> >>damit Menschen die die ursprüng
101 - 200 of 5029 matches
Mail list logo
