[OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Marc Gemis
Hi, My name is Marc Gemis. I'm new to OpenStreetMap. Since I'm using OpenFietsMap on my Garmin device and I hope to give something back. I saw that in my area (Reet (Rumst)) a number of Buurtwegen (BW) en Voetwegen (VW) are not on the map. I could also add a number of paths in the Park van Boom

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Julien Fastré
Hi, Welcome ! If you need help, just ask the list. Julien PS: If you want to meet other OSM'ers in Belgium : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Activities#Upcoming_activities Le 15/04/2011 13:10, Marc Gemis a écrit : Hi, My name is Marc Gemis. I'm new to OpenStreetMap.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Ivo De Broeck
Use potlatch 2 (simple) choose among the path's the generic path Interesting discussion to help a newbie ;-) 2011/4/15 Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com Jo wrote: Hi Marc, Your help will be much appreciated! Voetwegen are usually tagged as: highway=footway name=Voetweg 22 bicycle=yes

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Jo
He won't be a newbie for long, with our 'stoomcursus'... Polyglot 2011/4/15 Ivo De Broeck ivo.debro...@gmail.com Use potlatch 2 (simple) choose among the path's the generic path Interesting discussion to help a newbie ;-) 2011/4/15 Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com Jo wrote: Hi Marc,

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Ben Laenen
Ivo De Broeck wrote: Use potlatch 2 (simple) choose among the path's the generic path Interesting discussion to help a newbie ;-) (off-topic) That simple way of editing in Potlatch2 is just asking for trouble. I advise everyone to learn and use the raw tags from the start for things like

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Jo
Hi Marc, In JOSM, you can use aerial photography on the background by selecting: Luchtfotografie/Bing Sat in the menu. Then you can align your ways on those as well. As the name I would have put 'Buurtweg 23'. We don't use abbreviations in the names. (Except if BW23 is what you actually found

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Marc Gemis
Hi Jo, The signs of the buurtwegen en the voetwegen always have the abbreviated name BW23 or VW51, followed by the name of the residential road to which the are leading (and thus different on both sides). I'll look into aligning the BW23 with the aerial photo regards m On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Gerard Vanderveken
Hi and Welcome! I assume you use the Atlas for looking up 'trage wegen' (slow roads) Then it is as said in full Voetweg (sentier) or Buurtweg (chemin) followed by a number eg Voetweg 23 Example of Sint-Agatha-Rode (and area around)

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Gerard Vanderveken
Hi, Tags are good. Except segregated = no is only to be used with footway and cycleway. So, delete this tag. The name in full, name = Buurtweg 23 I don't know where you get this BW23 from. It is not indicated as such in the atlas: http://gis1.provant.be/Geoloketten/geoloket.jsp?geoloketid=55

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Jo
I see, then it's done differently in the province of Antwerp, than here in Vlaams-Brabant... 2011/4/15 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com Hi Jo, The signs of the buurtwegen en the voetwegen always have the abbreviated name BW23 or VW51, followed by the name of the residential road to which the

Re: [OSM-talk] We Need to Stop Google's Exploitation of Open Communities

2011-04-15 Thread Frederik Ramm
Mikel, On 04/11/2011 05:27 PM, Mikel Maron wrote: http://brainoff.com/weblog/2011/04/11/1635 In the following message, all quotes are from your blog post. I've given this matter some thought and I think while your concerns are legitimate, you are perhaps overreacting a bit. OpenStreetMap

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread 80n
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:08 AM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote: So my understanding now, from Francis' comment, is that CC-By-SA and CC-By are not compatible (you can't accept the CTs if you've contributed data obtained under those licenses, without infringing those licenses?),

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread Grant Slater
On 15 April 2011 00:38, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote: If data is tainted in a way that makes in incompatible with the currently used license then it will have to be removed in order not to put the project at risk (e.g. data copied from proprietary sources). This is independent of the

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread David Groom
- Original Message - From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org To: David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au Cc: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:08 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday Hi, David Murn wrote:

Re: [OSM-talk] CC-BY-SA still available?

2011-04-15 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:38:30 +0200 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: So I chose a slightly humorous response, treating Anthony as if he really were an innocent newbie. I didn't expect that I would have to explain the humour, but I guess I should have known better. Humour is quite

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:49:20 +0200 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Hi, Eric Marsden wrote: It is not clear to me, from your message or from what I have read on the wiki, whether choosing Decline is a irreversible decision, or whether one would still be able later to accept

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 04/15/2011 10:13 AM, David Groom wrote: There's also a third kind of tainted that sits in the middle of these two, namely data that has e.g. been released CC-BY. Such data looks compatible at first, but closer inspection (see current discussion on legal-talk) reveals that CC-BY

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit war, Mitrovica

2011-04-15 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 04:08:56 -0700 (PDT) ThomasB toba0...@yahoo.de wrote: Mitrovica was deleted by uboot http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7348595 could you please stop publicly blaming others for mistakes that you personally has made? ubot has deleted 15 ways and add some 60.

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit war, Mitrovica

2011-04-15 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 04/15/2011 01:14 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote: I don't like 'duplicate node removing' scripts or bots. Duplicate nodes may well have a function, or may not be duplicate at all. +1. Anyone who plans to indiscriminately fix duplicate nodes without actually looking at the situation (e.g.

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit war, Mitrovica

2011-04-15 Thread Vincent Pottier
Le 15/04/2011 13:24, Frederik Ramm a écrit : Hi, On 04/15/2011 01:14 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote: I don't like 'duplicate node removing' scripts or bots. Duplicate nodes may well have a function, or may not be duplicate at all. +1. Anyone who plans to indiscriminately fix duplicate nodes

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread David Groom
- Original Message - From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org To: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:11 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday Hi, On 04/15/2011 10:13 AM, David Groom wrote: There's also a third kind of

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread john whelan
Johnwhelan is the account name. Unfortunately I have made a fair number of edits. The concern is I'm not comfortable that all of these meet the new standard but I'm unsure which ones do and which don't. I'm happy to reenter data following the new guidelines. I'm not happy to have some one

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread Grant Slater
On 15 April 2011 13:28, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote: Johnwhelan is the account name.  Unfortunately I have made a fair number of edits.  The concern is I'm not comfortable that all of these meet the new standard but I'm unsure which ones do and which don't.  I'm happy to reenter

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 Pre-Announcement

2011-04-15 Thread Alex Ruddick
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Hi, Do you expect any positive outcome from this, or is it for moral reasons that you choose this course of action? There are regions in OSM where a visible no vote will lead to your data being re-surveyed and

[OSM-talk] question for folks working on routing engines

2011-04-15 Thread Richard Welty
this occurred to me while surveying speed limits in a somewhat rural part of the US. are any of the routing engines looking at the surface tag as part of their decision making? i ask this because in NY, the default speed limit in rural areas is 55 on all roads. there are numerous unpaved roads

Re: [OSM-talk] question for folks working on routing engines

2011-04-15 Thread Nic Roets
Hello Richard, Gosmore looks at maxspeed and tracktype. I did not use surface, because I am under the impression that it is possible to drive fast on properly maintained dirt roads in dryer regions. Regards, Nic On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: this

Re: [OSM-talk] question for folks working on routing engines

2011-04-15 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/4/15 Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net: i ask this because in NY, the default speed limit in rural areas is 55 on all roads. highway=unclassified name=Mead Road maxspeed=55 mph surface=dirt I suggest you also add source:maxspeed=US:NY:rural or sth. similar to the roads with no

Re: [OSM-talk] question for folks working on routing engines

2011-04-15 Thread Richard Welty
On 4/15/11 10:53 AM, Nic Roets wrote: Hello Richard, Gosmore looks at maxspeed and tracktype. I did not use surface, because I am under the impression that it is possible to drive fast on properly maintained dirt roads in dryer regions. interesting. i haven't been setting tracktype because

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread Kai Krueger
Frederik Ramm wrote: It would be very hard to construct something of that kind. The most common thing is certainly going to be the above third case, where you have the right to distribute data under CC-BY-SA or maybe even ODbL or maybe you even have the right to distribute it under any

Re: [OSM-talk] question for folks working on routing engines

2011-04-15 Thread Richard Welty
On 4/15/11 11:30 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2011/4/15 Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net: i ask this because in NY, the default speed limit in rural areas is 55 on all roads. highway=unclassified name=Mead Road maxspeed=55 mph surface=dirt I suggest you also add

Re: [OSM-talk] CC-BY-SA still available?

2011-04-15 Thread Anthony
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: He knows perfectly well, because he has been told a thousand times, that one of the countries where CC-BY-SA doesn't work for our data is his country of residence, the USA. Being told something is not equivalent to

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 Pre-Announcement

2011-04-15 Thread Anthony
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote: The revert script used to remove Anthony's edits (which were traced from Google) was a basic revert script which only used API methods. There were also mistakes made like reverting the items anthony had deleted

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 Pre-Announcement

2011-04-15 Thread Anthony
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Hi, David Murn wrote: Out of interest Grant, what other large-scale open source projects have changed their licence the way that OSM has?  In fact, changed their licence full-stop..? Wikipedia went from GFDL to

Re: [OSM-talk] CC-BY-SA still available?

2011-04-15 Thread Anthony
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: CC-BY-SA works exactly as intended.  In fact, the license even explicitly states its intent:  Nothing in this License is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any uses free from copyright or rights arising from limitations or

Re: [OSM-talk] question for folks working on routing engines

2011-04-15 Thread john
You are assuming that all dirt roads will be well-maintained, and that all dirt roads are in dry regions. Both assumptions are false. Most of the eastern half of the USA, and the Pacific Northwest of the USA, get plenty of rainfall, and even the dryer regions get some rainfall, some of it

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 04/15/2011 05:55 PM, Kai Krueger wrote: I thought that the new CTs were supposed to fix this issue [...] I have answered on legal-talk. Bye Frederik ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 Pre-Announcement

2011-04-15 Thread Andreas Perstinger
On 2011-04-14 21:18, Alex Ruddick wrote: If NEII's (and others) are removed, we can add the United States to Australia as 'countries the OSMF is willing to sacrifice.' I'm not afraid that NEII's contributions are lost because he states on his user page: All of my edits are released into the

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:36:34 +0200 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Hi, On 04/15/2011 05:55 PM, Kai Krueger wrote: I thought that the new CTs were supposed to fix this issue [...] I have answered on legal-talk. Bye Frederik Frederick, it has occurred to me that if you

Re: [OSM-talk] question for folks working on routing engines

2011-04-15 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:36:55 -0400 Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: this occurred to me while surveying speed limits in a somewhat rural part of the US. are any of the routing engines looking at the surface tag as part of their decision making? i ask this because in NY, the

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 Pre-Announcement

2011-04-15 Thread Alan Mintz
At 2011-04-12 11:56, Michael Collinson wrote: This is to let you know the license change process is moving to Phase 3 [1] very shortly. What exactly will be done with the existing data, and when? Understanding what happens to objects and their parents/siblings/children based on the license

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread Mike Dupont
What worries me here is that there are all these versions of the document, the licenses etc. How are you going to deal with different people agreeing to different contracts at different times? mike On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:08 AM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.comwrote: On 14 April 2011

[OSM-talk] Fwd: Fwd: Re: Hoping you can point me in the right direction.

2011-04-15 Thread Steve Coast
oops think I sent this to talk-IT too... Original Message Subject: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: Hoping you can point me in the right direction. Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:58:25 -0700 From: Steve Coast st...@asklater.com To: talk@openstreetmap.org Original Message

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 Pre-Announcement

2011-04-15 Thread Frederik Ramm
Alan, On 04/15/2011 11:01 PM, Alan Mintz wrote: What exactly will be done with the existing data, and when? Understanding what happens to objects and their parents/siblings/children based on the license acceptance of the original creator/intermediate editors/last editor is key to deciding

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 Pre-Announcement

2011-04-15 Thread Ian Dees
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Thus it doesn't make any sense to say that you want to base your agreement or non-agreement to the CT on whatever plans there may or may not be for dealing with objects that have been touched by many people. How else

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 Pre-Announcement

2011-04-15 Thread Dermot McNally
On 15 April 2011 23:21, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: At what point was the entire (active) OSM community asked if they wanted to relicense their data? If they haven't (I certainly wasn't) then when will we? Is this accept/decline that vote? If so, how do I vote no? How do I vote yes but

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 Pre-Announcement

2011-04-15 Thread Ian Dees
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 April 2011 23:21, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: At what point was the entire (active) OSM community asked if they wanted to relicense their data? If they haven't (I certainly wasn't) then when will we? Is

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 Pre-Announcement

2011-04-15 Thread Dermot McNally
On 16 April 2011 00:07, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for asking me (if this were a vote my answer would be No, but in the interest of moving on from this nonsense and keeping data flowing I'll eventually say Yes), but the important part of my question was everyone else -- the

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 Pre-Announcement

2011-04-15 Thread andrzej zaborowski
On 16 April 2011 01:29, Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote: This licence change now gives every mapper the means of undermining the map through withholding of their own data, once freely given and now very likely a foundation of data created by other mappers, also in good faith. I

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 Pre-Announcement

2011-04-15 Thread Kai Krueger
Dermot McNally wrote: FWIW I would have favoured earlier specific requests for a vote, but it's basically been an impossible position for the LWG from what I can see as an outsider. No, the vote part really isn't that difficult. Wikipedia managed to hold a vote on their licensing change.

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread David Murn
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 20:36 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, On 04/15/2011 05:55 PM, Kai Krueger wrote: I thought that the new CTs were supposed to fix this issue [...] I have answered on legal-talk. We dont care if you answered on a podcast sent to the moon. The question was asked

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/4/16 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au: On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 20:36 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote: I have answered on legal-talk. that disagree and believe the issue is of great enough importance to not be hidden away. it is not hidden away, and you don't even have to be subscribed to

Re: [OSM-talk] question for folks working on routing engines

2011-04-15 Thread John Smith
On 16 April 2011 00:36, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: i ask this because in NY, the default speed limit in rural areas is 55 on all roads. there are numerous unpaved roads (dirt, gravel) which do not have posted speed limits, but where driving at 55 is not reasonable unless

Re: [OSM-talk] question for folks working on routing engines

2011-04-15 Thread John Smith
On 16 April 2011 01:30, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: I suggest you also add source:maxspeed=US:NY:rural or sth. similar to the roads with no explicit maxspeed sign. Well he said 55mph is the default maximum for unsigned roads, wouldn't it be more useful for routing software

Re: [OSM-talk] question for folks working on routing engines

2011-04-15 Thread Richard Welty
On 4/15/11 11:16 PM, John Smith wrote: On 16 April 2011 00:36, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net wrote: i ask this because in NY, the default speed limit in rural areas is 55 on all roads. there are numerous unpaved roads (dirt, gravel) which do not have posted speed limits, but where

Re: [OSM-talk] question for folks working on routing engines

2011-04-15 Thread John Smith
On 16 April 2011 13:25, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: what i'm after are parameters so that the routing engines present rational results to drivers who aren't me. so why don't we focus on the actual problem in front of us instead of posturing about our driving skills. Well you

Re: [OSM-talk] question for folks working on routing engines

2011-04-15 Thread John Smith
On 16 April 2011 13:43, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 April 2011 13:25, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: what i'm after are parameters so that the routing engines present rational results to drivers who aren't me. so why don't we focus on the actual problem in

[Talk-it] Josm Osmarender plugin, ma funziona ?

2011-04-15 Thread at1839
Windows XP e Firefox 4.0 Se josm sta mostrando a video solo pochissimi dati il plugin sembra funzionare, nel senso che lancia Firefox, compare brevemente la scritta 'waiting for xobjex.com' e poi arriva l'immagine, probabilmente all'atto pratico limitata ad una sola tile. Se allargo, uno scatto di

Re: [Talk-it] Segnalazione Evento Mapping Party Alberoni domeninca 17 aprile Lido di Venezia

2011-04-15 Thread Gianluca De Rossi
Il 13 aprile 2011 15:21, Luca Delucchi ha scritto: A parte che il programma mi sembra ancora provvisorio :-) orario di inizio?? Ho completato un po' la pagina... per quanto mi è possibile Giampiero vi scriverà quanto prima gli orari di ritrovo precisi! Indicativamente metà mattinata: quindi

[Talk-it] mapping party montagna

2011-04-15 Thread Luca Delucchi
Anche quest'anno mi farebbe piacere organizzare un mapping party in montagna. Visto per il primo è stato nelle alpi più o meno centrali, l'anno scorso in quelle occidentali, quest'anno mi sembrerebbe giusto farlo in quelle orientali, ci sono però alcuni punti da capire: - abbiamo possibili

Re: [Talk-it] mapping party montagna

2011-04-15 Thread ale_z...@libero.it
Messaggio originale Da: lucadel...@gmail.com Data: 15/04/2011 16.06 A: openstreetmap list - italianotalk-it@openstreetmap.org Ogg: [Talk-it] mapping party montagna Anche quest'anno mi farebbe piacere organizzare un mapping party in montagna. Visto per il primo è stato nelle alpi più o

Re: [Talk-it] Simone Cortesi

2011-04-15 Thread Fabio Alessandro Locati
Have you found him? Fabio A Locati On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 7:41 PM, niubii f.pelu...@gmail.com wrote: I heard last week, was in Tuscany. I will try again later. Ciao /niubii/ 2011/4/13 Steve Coast st...@asklater.com Dear talk-it The OSMF is concerned about the whereabouts of Simone,

Re: [Talk-it] mapping party montagna

2011-04-15 Thread Elycoimax
Il 15/04/2011 19.14, ale_z...@libero.it ha scritto: Che tempismo, ci pensavo sabato scorso mentre ero sull'Antola. Magari vediamo chi si fa avanti e poi decidiamo in quale regione andare. Forza gente, partecipate numerosi!! Alessandro Ale_Zena_IT Magari. Mi piacerebbe veramente!!! Massimo

Re: [Talk-it] Simone Cortesi

2011-04-15 Thread Steve Coast
Yes, we're worried. On 4/15/2011 10:40 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: Have you found him? Fabio A Locati On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 7:41 PM, niubiif.pelu...@gmail.com wrote: I heard last week, was in Tuscany. I will try again later. Ciao /niubii/ 2011/4/13 Steve

Re: [Talk-it] mapping party montagna

2011-04-15 Thread Tiziano D'Angelo
2011/4/15 Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto lorenzetto.l...@gmail.com Non saprei i contatti, pero' sicuramente potrebbe essere un occasione per le dolomiti, da poco divenute patrimonio dell'umanita' UNESCO. Concordo la tua scelta :) - Ad esempio si potrebbe mappare un pezzo/tappa di alta via (ad es.

Re: [Talk-it] Simone Cortesi

2011-04-15 Thread Fabio Alessandro Locati
Have you found him? Yes, we're worried. So you should not be worried any more :/. (Or maybe that we're was a we were instead of we are?) Fabio On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote: Yes, we're worried. On 4/15/2011 10:40 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:

Re: [Talk-it] Simone Cortesi

2011-04-15 Thread Steve Coast
I meant as in yes please find him not yes we have found him On 4/15/2011 10:47 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: Have you found him? Yes, we're worried. So you should not be worried any more :/. (Or maybe that we're was a we were instead of we are?) Fabio On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:43 PM,

Re: [Talk-it] Simone Cortesi

2011-04-15 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/4/15 Steve Coast st...@asklater.com: I meant as in yes please find him not yes we have found him Last notice of him I have is 3 days ago (via someone else). I also tried to call him on his mobile without success. cheers, Martin ___ Talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] mapping party montagna

2011-04-15 Thread Fabri
Il -10/01/-28163 20:59, Luca Delucchi ha scritto: Anche quest'anno mi farebbe piacere organizzare un mapping party in montagna. Visto per il primo è stato nelle alpi più o meno centrali, l'anno scorso in quelle occidentali, quest'anno mi sembrerebbe giusto farlo in quelle orientali, ci sono

Re: [Talk-it] mapping party montagna

2011-04-15 Thread Roberto Moretti
Il 15 aprile 2011 16:06, Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com ha scritto: Anche quest'anno mi farebbe piacere organizzare un mapping party in montagna. Visto per il primo è stato nelle alpi più o meno centrali, +1 :) Ciao. Robi ___ Talk-it mailing

Re: [Talk-it] Simone Cortesi

2011-04-15 Thread Fabio Alessandro Locati
On Wednesday his phone was out-of-order while now is ringing. An improvement at least :). I hope he'll answer soon :) Fabio On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:52 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/4/15 Steve Coast st...@asklater.com: I meant as in yes please find him not yes we

[Talk-it] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: Hoping you can point me in the right direction.

2011-04-15 Thread Steve Coast
Original Message Subject: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: Hoping you can point me in the right direction. Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:58:25 -0700 From: Steve Coast st...@asklater.com To: t...@openstreetmap.org Original Message Subject:Re: Hoping you

[Talk-at] Donauradweg

2011-04-15 Thread h8t luv
Hi Leute, da ich gerade dabei bin einige Fehler in den Straßen in der Wachau zu korrigieren viel mir folgendes auf: Beim Anlegen des Donauradweges wurde offensichtlich etwas übertrieben. Hier wurden teilweise ganz normale Straßen mit cycleway=lane gekennzeichnet, obwohl es auf den besagten

Re: [Talk-at] OSM-Stand @ Linuxwochen 2011 Wien

2011-04-15 Thread Andreas Labres
On 15.04.11 08:49, Werner Macho wrote: http://sotm-eu.org/userfiles/poster_fossgis.pdf Platten sollte kein problem sein.. Super! Wenn der Wien ausschnitt den du haben willst auch als pdf wo ist wäre das super.. wie gross das Poster? http://www.openstreetmap.at/wien/wien2011.png falls Du

Re: [Talk-at] Donauradweg

2011-04-15 Thread wolfbert
Hallo, die verschiedenen Möglichkeiten zum Kennzeichnen eines Radweges (Verkehrszeichen, bauliche Gegebenheiten, Radfahrerseiten im Wiki, Tagkombinationen) hast Du Dir ja sicher angesehen. Dann würde ich sagen, mappe das, was Du vor Ort siehst (im Zweifel kannst Du ja auch kurz den

Re: [Talk-at] Donauradweg

2011-04-15 Thread Andreas Labres
Hallo namenlos! Kannst bitte nächstens für ein neues Thema auch einen neuen Thread anfangen? Danke! (nicht Antworten, wenn's mit dem ursprünglichen Thema nix zu tun hat, sondern Neue Mail schreiben...) On 15.04.11 10:05, h8t luv wrote: Beim Anlegen des Donauradweges wurde offensichtlich etwas

Re: [Talk-at] Donauradweg

2011-04-15 Thread liberalerhumanist
Der Donauradweg sollte kein großes Problems sein, es gibt einiges an Literatur, in der auch der Zustand der jeweiligen Abschnitte angegeben ist. Mir ist aus NÖ ein Problem in Erinnerung: Manche Strecken, die als Radweg ausgewiesen sind haben einige Streifen von einem halben meter Breite,

Re: [Talk-at] Donauradweg

2011-04-15 Thread Boris Cornet
Servus! Heute (15. April) um 10:05 tippte h8t luv: Beim Anlegen des Donauradweges wurde offensichtlich etwas übertrieben. Hier wurden teilweise ganz normale Straßen mit cycleway=lane gekennzeichnet, obwohl es auf den besagten Straßen keinerlei dedizierte Markierungen gibt. Wenn da keine

Re: [Talk-at] landuse-pletschn über linz

2011-04-15 Thread Flaimo
ohne jetzt weiter auf die dogmatischen sichten einzugehen wie detailiert der landuse gemappt werden soll, würde ich gerne wieder zum gegenteil und somit zum ursprünglichen thema zurückkommen. was sollte jetzt mit der großen area passieren? komplett löschen? grob zerstückeln? gar nicht angreifen?

Re: [Talk-at] landuse-pletschn über linz

2011-04-15 Thread numenor
Hallo, On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:35:53 +0200, Flaimo fla...@gmail.com wrote: gegenteil und somit zum ursprünglichen thema zurückkommen. was sollte jetzt mit der großen area passieren? komplett löschen? grob zerstückeln? gar nicht angreifen? Zusammengefasst und die anderen Emails in Betracht

Re: [Talk-at] Donauradweg

2011-04-15 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 15.04.2011 12:17, liberalerhuman...@gmx-topmail.de wrote: Mir ist aus NÖ ein Problem in Erinnerung: Manche Strecken, die als Radweg ausgewiesen sind haben einige Streifen von einem halben meter Breite, daneben fahren tlw. Lastwägen, speziell im Strudengau wird dies etlichen Radfahrern zum

Re: [Talk-hr] Biciklističke staze

2011-04-15 Thread Janko Mihelić
Dobar prvi post! Ne znam zašto se nitko ne javlja, a svi se slažemo da moramo srediti te biciklističke tagove. Sviđa mi se simetričnost highway=path taga koji nije niti footway niti cycleway. Ali ne sviđa mi se to što smo path do sada koristili za footway koji nije betoniran. Znači zemljane

Re: [talk-ph] Fwd: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread Andre Marcelo-Tanner
how come our acceptance is rather low? http://odbl.de/ There are few large editors, have they not all agreed to it, or some disagree? Andre On 3:59 AM, maning sambale wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Michael Collinsonm...@ayeltd.biz Date: Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:39 AM

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, (Thread moved over from talk) On 04/15/2011 05:55 PM, Kai Krueger wrote: In addition, it is imho not clear that not some of the many imports listed as Attribution licensed wouldn't fall into this category, too (rather than in category 3 as CC-BY). To be clear, my category 3 was meant for

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread Francis Davey
On 15 April 2011 19:35, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: In addition, it is imho not clear that not some of the many imports listed as Attribution licensed wouldn't fall into this category, too (rather than in category 3 as CC-BY). I haven't seen this list so cannot comment. [snip]

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday

2011-04-15 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 04/15/2011 09:16 PM, Francis Davey wrote: In addition, it is imho not clear that not some of the many imports listed as Attribution licensed wouldn't fall into this category, too (rather than in category 3 as CC-BY). I haven't seen this list so cannot comment. Sorry for that. I had

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Veerse Meer

2011-04-15 Thread Robert Elsenaar
LEnnard, Ik voel mij niet in de positie om jouw noeste arbeid in twijfel te trekken. Ik was echter niet in de positie (op het werk) om in JOSm te kijken. Wel zag ik op de map dat het verkeerd was. Bedankt voor het fiksen. Was Tavernses dankbaar voor de reverts? ;-) Groet Robert

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Veerse Meer

2011-04-15 Thread Lennard
On 15-4-2011 21:58, Robert Elsenaar wrote: Ik voel mij niet in de positie om jouw noeste arbeid in twijfel te trekken. Ik was echter niet in de positie (op het werk) om in JOSm te kijken. Wel zag ik op de map dat het verkeerd was. Bedankt voor het fiksen. Was Tavernses dankbaar voor de reverts?

[talk-au] Fw: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: Hoping you can point me in the right direction.

2011-04-15 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
Someone local to this guy want to speak with him? Begin forwarded message: Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:58:25 -0700 From: Steve Coast st...@asklater.com To: t...@openstreetmap.org Subject: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: Hoping you can point me in the right direction. Original Message

[talk-au] ABS CodePlay

2011-04-15 Thread John Smith
An Australian Bureau of Statistics initiative to help drive collaboration between students, developers and national and international statistical agencies. http://data.gov.au/2770/contest-abs-codeplay/ ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org

Re: [talk-au] ABS CodePlay

2011-04-15 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:21:59 +1000 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: An Australian Bureau of Statistics initiative to help drive collaboration between students, developers and national and international statistical agencies. http://data.gov.au/2770/contest-abs-codeplay/ that

[Talk-br] Videos sobre Geoprocessamento

2011-04-15 Thread Djavan Fagundes
Pessoal, Recebi hoje um link com uma série de vídeos falando sobre geoprocessamento. É bem interessante.. Fala sobre o episódio do Haiti.. http://geospatialrevolution.psu.edu/ -- Djavan Fagundes E-mail | xmpp: dja...@comum.org http://djavan.comum.org/blog/ http://butequeiro.comum.org/

Re: [Talk-br] Digest Talk-br, volume 31, assunto 7

2011-04-15 Thread vitor
Oi Mauro, Abaixo está o link com todas as cidades http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/Brasil_250_Cidades/Lista_Completa_de_Cidades http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/Brasil_250_Cidades/Lista_Completa_de_Cidades Você pode buscar as coordenadas digitando os

Re: [Talk-de] Schreibweise von Hausnummern

2011-04-15 Thread Rainer Knaepper
koppenho schrieb: Hallo *, wie taggt man am besten folgende addr:housenumber-Angaben: 1. Hausnummer mit Buchstabenzusatz: Trage ich immer ohne Leerzeichen zwischen Nummer und Buchstabe ein. 2. Hausnummer mit Zusatz Einhalb: 42 1/2? Das ist vermutlich ok, aber kommt damit eine Zielort-Suche

Re: [Talk-de] Schreibweise von Hausnummern

2011-04-15 Thread Peter Wendorff
Hallo Andreas. Soweit ich bisher gelesen und selbst getan habe, tagge ich die Hausnummern unter addr:housenumber so, wie sie auf dem Schild bzw. in der Adresse steht. Hausnummern mit Zusatz folgen schon national in Deutschland keinen einheitlichen Regeln - da gibt es 42 1/2, 1 a, 1 A, 1a, 1A

Re: [Talk-de] Lizenzwechsel Phase 3 beginnt am Sonntag

2011-04-15 Thread Rainer Knaepper
Frederik Ramm schrieb: Rainer Knaepper wrote: Knuffig ist, daß ich einer rechtsverbindlichen Vereinbarung zustimmen soll, die ich nicht verstehe. Es gibt inoffizelle Uebersetzungen. Wenn Du auf die Wikiseite zu den Contributor Terms schaust

Re: [Talk-de] Schreibweise von Hausnummern

2011-04-15 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:07:42AM +0200, koppenho wrote: Hallo *, wie taggt man am besten folgende addr:housenumber-Angaben: 1. Hausnummer mit Buchstabenzusatz: Trage ich immer ohne Leerzeichen zwischen Nummer und Buchstabe ein. 2. Hausnummer mit Zusatz Einhalb: 42 1/2? Das ist

Re: [Talk-de] Darstellung von geotagged Bildern in OSM

2011-04-15 Thread hike39
Hallo Kolossos, ich weiss meine ursprüngliche Anfrage ist schon lange her, aber bis jetzt hatte ich leider noch keine Zeit mich mit Openlayers zu befassen. Gibt es zufällig eine eteas umfangreichere Beschreibung, zu dieser Lösung? Grüße hike39 Am 09.10.2010 00:24, schrieb Kolossos: Schau mal:

Re: [Talk-de] Mapnik deutscher Kartenstil: fehlende Bezeichnung von Flüssen

2011-04-15 Thread Sven Geggus
yobiSource yobisou...@googlemail.com wrote: ich erstelle gerade SLD Styles für Geoserver und orientiere mich dabei am deutschen Mapnik Kartenstil. Mir ist dabei aufgefallen das in der Datei layer-water.xml.inc (im Gegensatz zum englischen Stil) waterway=river keine Bezeichnung hat aber

Re: [Talk-de] Schreibweise von Hausnummern

2011-04-15 Thread Dietmar
Hallo Florian, Von: Florian Lohoff [mailto:f...@zz.de] Gesendet am: Freitag, 15. April 2011 10:02 ... Und was 42 1/2 angeht - Ich glaube nicht das das offiziell ist. Da hat sich jemand einen Scherz geleistet :) Flo Nö, bei uns in Augsburg gibt es die offiziell. Das Extrem ist

[Talk-de] Tag für Bauunternehmer

2011-04-15 Thread hike39
Hallo zusammen, hat jemand von Euch einen Tipp wie man Büros oder Gelände von Bauunternehmern taggt? Dies schließt natuerlich Hoch- und Tiefbau ein. Gruß hike39 ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

  1   2   >