At 10:43 AM 21/05/2009, maning sambale wrote:
Hi,
Some GPS/data contributor (not osm contributor), suggested I add place
reference to POI like in the name tag Jollibee (Morato) or
Jollibee-Morato something. Adding this should allow referencing of
POI names in GPS units. However, we have an
Here's my post-party blog report
http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/post-party-report-tagaytay-osm-ph-mapping/
And since the party was so last week, where do we go next?
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
Napansin ninyo ba, ambilis mag-update ng
I was thinking of having a branch=* tag for these things. That way, the
tools/renderers can have freedom to use this info however they want (add
them in parentheses, use smaller fonts, etc.).
Practically every company that has branches have names for their branches.
It's not necessarily the
Thanks
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Andre Marcelo-Tanner
an...@enthropia.com wrote:
Awesome post, will spread the word. Would be cool too if the video had
some quick music :)
Sorry, no time right now. The render is just a python script. I can
send the file for anyone who wants to do more
Yup, we use the GT-31 GPS (other GPS unit will do as long as it sends
raw NMEA data). You can use two laptop and 1 GPS unit the laptop where
the GPS is connected can share the GPS data to the other laptop using
ad-hoc connection (not road tested yet). You will now have a GPS
server for the other
( CHANGE THE EMAIL ADDRESS :( These odd sites that don't return list
posts to the list ARE a pain! )
Guenther Meyer wrote:
Am Wednesday 20 May 2009 schrieb Greg Troxel:
we in germany have the three base zones I mentioned, but it's no problem tom
extend these for countries with more basic
So as long as exception roads have speed tags, what's the
problem?
None as far as I can see, but by the time you've checked every road
in the zone to see whether it is an exception, and presumably tagged
it as checked so other mappers know it has been checked so they
don't also need to go and
Am Thursday 21 May 2009 schrieb Lester Caine:
For routing purposes, the speed for each segment of a route is
important, and for speed I am sure that the ideal situation is that ALL
highway segments have their speeds assigned ( ADDING VARIABLE for those
motorway flyover routes which pass over
Am Thursday 21 May 2009 schrieb Radomir Cernoch:
Guenther Meyer píše v Čt 21. 05. 2009 v 00:49 +0200:
Am Wednesday 20 May 2009 schrieb Radomir Cernoch:
...but you would need some kind of gis database/functions to evaluate the
polygon data.
the easy way of reading just keys and values like
Am Thursday 21 May 2009 schrieb Radomir Cernoch:
Guenther Meyer píše v Čt 21. 05. 2009 v 00:51 +0200:
Am Wednesday 20 May 2009 schrieb Jacek Konieczny:
That would not work very well in Poland. Town/city/village
administrative border usually differ from the built up zone borders.
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:57:52PM +0100, Radomir Cernoch wrote:
The problem with the polygon is that you set a default without checking
every
individual street.
Yes, but there are other people as well. What if they add a new street
to the area you have carefully checked and then
I would suggest: motorway, urban, rural.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Guenther Meyer [mailto:d@sordidmusic.com]
Sent: 20 May 2009 06:44
To: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: [OSM-talk] zones for motorway/in town/outof town?
hi,
currently there is a discussion on the german
2009/5/20 Joe Richards joefis...@yahoo.com:
Where did this idea go in the end? It seems the talk about it petered-out, or
was some action agreed (along with who was going to undertake it)?
Given the US have forgotten to keep the GPS system up to date, maybe
we need a few satelites of our
On Thursday 21 May 2009 01:24:36 Radomir Cernoch wrote:
Cartinus píše v Čt 21. 05. 2009 v 01:01 +0200:
It is completely possible for a village ringroad on a bridge
(highway=primary or secondary) to have a maxspeed of 80 km/h due to being
outside the build-up zone, not because there is a
Guenther Meyer wrote:
So while discussing HOW the default speed for roads are calculated is
important, can we not simply apply that speed without adding another
layer of complexity?
I wouldn't do that, because it's a derived value depending on a lot of things
like road type, time of day,
Hi all,
It's been an important 24 hours for the webmapping world. At last -
and after many months of expectation - UK cycle charity Sustrans
released their new online slippy map. Oh yeah, and some irritating US
outfit did some data API or something.
But never mind any of that, because it's
Am Thursday 21 May 2009 schrieb Cartinus:
The ringroad does not have the tag maxspeed=80 !!!
It has a maxspeed of 80 km/h because that is the default maxspeed of
roads out of town in that country. Out of town was one of the three
zones in the initial idea. It is defined by the country
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
If you ask for the limit on the ringroad, the answer is:
80, because it has the tag maxspeed=80, which has greater importance
than the zone-50.[...]
The ringroad does not have the tag maxspeed=80 !!!
It has a maxspeed of 80
Offline editing.
Whoa! Gotta try this one. Congrats for all your work.
--
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
Most websites will give the terms under which content can be used, and
these are no exception - they can't! At least not with negotiation with
the vendors to permit CCbySA licensing.
For example, under Important Notices the first two sites say:
The material on this site is covered by the
Where did this idea go in the end? It seems the talk about it petered-out, or
was some action agreed (along with who was going to undertake it)?
Given the US have forgotten to keep the GPS system up to date, maybe
we need a few satelites of our own to replace it... Or maybe we can
use
Guenther Meyer wrote:
Am Thursday 21 May 2009 schrieb Lester Caine:
Guenther Meyer wrote:
So while discussing HOW the default speed for roads are calculated is
important, can we not simply apply that speed without adding another
layer of complexity?
I wouldn't do that, because it's a derived
I haven't seen this anywhere, but it seems that Google is updating its
satellite
maps with even higher resolution data.
Compare what I previously knew as best resolution:
http://maps.google.nl/maps?f=qsource=s_qhl=nlgeocode=ie=UTF8ll=51.835292,5.859522spn=0.001566,0.003272t=kz=19
with this:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
with this:
http://maps.google.nl/maps?f=qsource=s_qhl=nlgeocode=ie=UTF8ll=51.973234,4.253047spn=0.000781,0.001636t=kz=20
AFAIK Milano has been like this detailed for at least a year now:
http://tinyurl.com/plusxg
--
-S
Am Thursday 21 May 2009 schrieb Lester Caine:
ALL roads have a defined maximum speed limit ... is this just a matter
of 'conversion to english'? The fact that a road does not have a
specific sign is not something that maxspeed is concerned with? At least
in my reading of the guide lines on
And that means: it's time for Potlatch 1.0.
Just had a play - both offline and live editing and wow - it's lovely.
Seems to be lots quicker too...
Great job
Regards
Phil
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Guenther Meyer píše v Čt 21. 05. 2009 v 09:20 +0200:
Am Thursday 21 May 2009 schrieb Radomir Cernoch:
Hi, this sounds reasonable. But is there a difference between
boundary=administrative and zone:administrative=*?
it's exactly the same, just the name is a different one.
I would propose
And that means: it's time for Potlatch 1.0.
Just had a play - both offline and live editing and wow - it's lovely.
Seems to be lots quicker too...
Great job
Regards
Phil
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
2009/5/21 Joe Richards joefis...@yahoo.com:
Where did this idea go in the end? It seems the talk about it petered-out, or
was some action agreed (along with who was going to undertake it)?
Given the US have forgotten to keep the GPS system up to date, maybe
we need a few satelites of our
Guenther Meyer píše v Čt 21. 05. 2009 v 09:02 +0200:
yes - if you can make use of a database with geospatial extension like
postgis. there you have functions to find out easily if a point or a line
(which streets are) lies inside a given polygon.
I you don't have those functions, I don't
Guenther Meyer wrote:
Am Thursday 21 May 2009 schrieb Lester Caine:
ALL roads have a defined maximum speed limit ... is this just a matter
of 'conversion to english'? The fact that a road does not have a
specific sign is not something that maxspeed is concerned with? At least
in my reading of
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Aun Yngve Johnsen
skipp...@gimnechiske.org wrote:
Can somebody look into reverting way 33136730 and 33136657. They seem
to have been buggy (only 3 nodes visible out of many) and whan I did
an update of relations connected to these roads, they was updated with
Here are three proposals for identifying high level marine features that I
already use.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Ocean
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Sea
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Archipelago
Comments on each
2009/5/21 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org
2009/5/21 Joe Richards joefis...@yahoo.com:
Where did this idea go in the end? It seems the talk about it
petered-out, or was some action agreed (along with who was going to
undertake it)?
Given the US have forgotten to keep the GPS system
Am Thursday 21 May 2009 schrieb Radomir Cernoch:
Guenther Meyer píše v Čt 21. 05. 2009 v 09:02 +0200:
yes - if you can make use of a database with geospatial extension like
postgis. there you have functions to find out easily if a point or a line
(which streets are) lies inside a given
Am Thursday 21 May 2009 schrieb Lester Caine:
right, all roads have a defined limit.
the proposal is:
if there is a sign for a speed limit: use maxspeed = ...
if not: use zone:traffic = ...
the maxspeed here can be derived from the zone tag.
For routing purposes ... building the time
Am Thursday 21 May 2009 schrieb Radomir Cernoch:
Guenther Meyer píše v Čt 21. 05. 2009 v 09:20 +0200:
Am Thursday 21 May 2009 schrieb Radomir Cernoch:
Hi, this sounds reasonable. But is there a difference between
boundary=administrative and zone:administrative=*?
it's exactly the
Richard,
Sustrans online continues to disappoint this user.
Potlatch continues to satisfy requirements of this user.
Thanks for all time you have put in to develop these new features.
Cheers
STEVE
-Original Message-
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org
Florian Lohoff píše v Čt 21. 05. 2009 v 09:21 +0200:
There is no solution other than local survey - everything else is
guessing - and IMHO openstreetmap is a collection of facts not guesses.
So better have no fact than wrong guesses - at least thats true
for maxspeed.
Than why do we have
Radomir Cernoch schrieb:
...
Sorry, I maybe didn't make myself clear. Polygon rules do not apply
for motorways. Is there any country, where a highway inside a city has
different speed limit from the highway outside of the city? Even if yes,
this can be specified in the set of country-specific
On Thursday 21 May 2009 16:26:04 Guenther Meyer wrote:
what we could do as a hint for routers and drivers, is adding the
information that the road is equipped with a traffic guidance system.
Looking at tagwatch, you can find maxspeed=signals in use already.
--
m.v.g.,
Cartinus
Hi,
your mail suggests it's time for recapitulation.
Firstly let's describe the without-polygon model:
1) Road has tag maxspeed.
= I have the answer based purely on maxspeed tag.
= Stop any further reasoning.
2) Road has tag zone:traffic
= I have the answer based on the combination of
Am Thursday 21 May 2009 schrieb Cartinus:
On Thursday 21 May 2009 16:26:04 Guenther Meyer wrote:
what we could do as a hint for routers and drivers, is adding the
information that the road is equipped with a traffic guidance system.
Looking at tagwatch, you can find maxspeed=signals in use
Please reverse the changeset #1268604:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1268604
Chris
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Radomir Cernoch schrieb:
...
Ok, then why should we have the polygons?
** It models the law more accurately.*
...
this assumption is not correct.
Indeed it more incorrect than tagging trafficzone=* on the Ways itself,
becasue nether private property nor public parcs, nor anykind of other
On Thursday 21 May 2009 17:21:18 Guenther Meyer wrote:
Looking at tagwatch, you can find maxspeed=signals in use already.
is this tag used for such things also, not only traffic lights?
fine!
AFAIK a traffic light is a node object with a highway=traffic_signals.
AFAIK a way with
Am Thursday 21 May 2009 schrieb Radomir Cernoch:
Ok, then why should we have the polygons?
we are talking here about the mentioned tags for the traffic, not
administrative or other boundaries, right?
ok,. let's see:
* It models the law more accurately.
false. the traffic laws apply to streets
Radomír Černoch schrieb:
2009/5/21 Mario Salvini salv...@t-online.de:
Radomir Cernoch schrieb:
...
Ok, then why should we have the polygons?
** It models the law more accurately.*
...
this assumption is not correct.
Indeed it more incorrect than tagging trafficzone=* on
Am 20.05.2009 um 17:11 schrieb Mike Ryan:
At the end, it says that you can remove features, by removing the
rules from osm-map-features-z17.xml file. However, when I took out
pubs, for example, they're still there when I render the map. (I'm
trying to generate a simple map with just street
* The question of querying node within a polygon or line withing a
polygon. So far it seems that such query is doable using PostGis.
Nevertheless this needs to be confirmed.
postgis or other similar software.
a lot of overhead that could be avoided. not good for developing software
Cartinus wrote:
AFAIK a way with maxspeed=signals is used for those portals with the
electronic speed signs you see over the motorway.
I actually hope mappers only use maxspeed=signals for those motorway
sections where the speed routinely changes based on congestion or time
of day. Not to
So while it seems to be a polygon vs tags on ways discussion:
I wonder what people have against using relations to combine all roads
in one built-up area, or one maxspeed zone, or some other kind of zone.
It's really the cleanest option and allows for additional tags like a
name, and it
Am Thursday 21 May 2009 schrieb Ben Laenen:
So while it seems to be a polygon vs tags on ways discussion:
I wonder what people have against using relations to combine all roads
in one built-up area, or one maxspeed zone, or some other kind of zone.
It's really the cleanest option and allows
Hi all,
I created a symbol and some rules for the key/value tourism/
apartment. How can I contribute this symbol (svg) and the rules to
the official osm-map-features-z17.xml?
A description for this node is here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tags#References
Thanks in advance, Ingo
--
Ben Laenen píše v Čt 21. 05. 2009 v 17:54 +0200:
So while it seems to be a polygon vs tags on ways discussion:
I wonder what people have against using relations to combine all roads
in one built-up area, or one maxspeed zone, or some other kind of zone.
It's really the cleanest option and
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Ingo Lantschner
listen2...@lantschner.name wrote:
Hi all,
I created a symbol and some rules for the key/value tourism/
apartment. How can I contribute this symbol (svg) and the rules to
the official osm-map-features-z17.xml?
I think you need to find a
On 21 May 2009, at 17:33, Radomir Cernoch wrote:
Ben Laenen píše v Čt 21. 05. 2009 v 17:54 +0200:
So while it seems to be a polygon vs tags on ways discussion:
I wonder what people have against using relations to combine all
roads
in one built-up area, or one maxspeed zone, or some other
Ben Laenen wrote:
It's really the cleanest option and allows for additional tags like a
name, and it allows everything to be more clearly defined,
I don't see why that would be the case. For every way with tag X, Y
applies isn't any less clearly defined than For every way in a
relation with
Radomir Cernoch schrieb:
Ben Laenen píše v Čt 21. 05. 2009 v 17:54 +0200:
So while it seems to be a polygon vs tags on ways discussion:
I wonder what people have against using relations to combine all roads
in one built-up area, or one maxspeed zone, or some other kind of zone.
It's
We already have default speed limits within urban zones defined by a
polygone. No relation here. Now, you are talking about an exception to
the default speed limit and I hope, it is a minority of streets in
this case. Then just simply add the tag maxspeed to these ways, thus
overriding any default
On Thursday 21 May 2009, Guenther Meyer wrote:
relations are one of only three basic structures in OSM (node - way
- relation), can we please assume that someone mapping with OSM can
grasp three concepts? He already should be able to deal with them
now anyway.
they are, but at least for
On Thursday 21 May 2009, Mario Salvini wrote:
Even every relevant road for _ONE_ city in one relation won't work,
because the membercount of a relation is limited since API 0.6.
This methode won't create any benefit.
Well, apparently it isn't limited, and luckily it isn't. It would be an
On Thursday 21 May 2009, Radomir Cernoch wrote:
Ben Laenen píše v Čt 21. 05. 2009 v 17:54 +0200:
So while it seems to be a polygon vs tags on ways discussion:
I wonder what people have against using relations to combine all
roads in one built-up area, or one maxspeed zone, or some other
On 21 May 2009, at 18:17, Ben Laenen wrote:
On Thursday 21 May 2009, Mario Salvini wrote:
Even every relevant road for _ONE_ city in one relation won't work,
because the membercount of a relation is limited since API 0.6.
This methode won't create any benefit.
Well, apparently it isn't
Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk writes:
So as long as exception roads have speed tags, what's the
problem?
None as far as I can see, but by the time you've checked every road
in the zone to see whether it is an exception, and presumably tagged
it as checked so other mappers know it has been
On Thursday 21 May 2009, you wrote:
On 21 May 2009, at 18:17, Ben Laenen wrote:
On Thursday 21 May 2009, Mario Salvini wrote:
Even every relevant road for _ONE_ city in one relation won't
work, because the membercount of a relation is limited since API
0.6. This methode won't create any
Hi,
Christian Kögler wrote:
Please reverse the changeset #1268604:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1268604
Done, and emailed the user to find out what he did and if we can somehow
improve JOSM so that it doesn't happen more often...
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail
Am Thursday 21 May 2009 schrieb Ben Laenen:
I'm not proposing it for everything, I'm only proposing it for something
where other structures have obvious setbacks.
fine. there seem to be people that are doing that.
But from some reason using relations for something else than routes is
Thanks for the help
Aun
On 21/05/2009, at 08:12, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Aun Yngve Johnsen
skipp...@gimnechiske.org wrote:
Can somebody look into reverting way 33136730 and 33136657. They seem
to have been buggy (only 3 nodes visible out of many) and whan I did
Holger,
Great script for modifying mapnik symbology for higher/print
resolution, and awesome to hear that you are using Cascadenik.
Just a note that I've started to work in Mapnik core for supporting
scaling based on variable resolution output:
http://trac.mapnik.org/ticket/343
- Dane
On
Am I missing something, or can we not just assume that e.g.
each highway=residential has a speed limit consistent with urban areas in
that country - unless explicitly tagged otherwise
e.g. in the UK, highway=residential would be 30mph (48.28032km/h), unless
tagged as something else.
each
To put OSM data live to xmpp ist very simple and I don't think it's
expensive.
Coming back to this a bit older topic. XMPP is server-based solution, so you
will overload some server. Why not use good old and free Kazaa network, in
its Skype groupchat re-incarnation, so the delivery channel
My opinion is that all defaults should be global. We should not have any
country or urban / rural specific defaults. It will mean most ways will need
a lot of extra tags. So we may need to improve the editors to make it easier
to add all those tags. For example give the editors modes like Rural UK
Richard Bullock schrieb:
Am I missing something, or can we not just assume that e.g.
each highway=residential has a speed limit consistent with urban areas in
that country - unless explicitly tagged otherwise
e.g. in the UK, highway=residential would be 30mph (48.28032km/h), unless
tagged
Hi,
I have lots of friends with SonyEricsson phones and I have one
bluetooth GPS dongle that I can give to them for making GPS logs.
I have stumbled upon a rock - that is which software works on
SonyEricsson phones without problems. Mainly I'm looking for software
that mainly for SE K510 and SE
Am 21.05.2009 um 18:42 schrieb Adam Schreiber:
I created a symbol and some rules for the key/value tourism/
apartment.
I think you need to find a different key than apartment. It seems you
want to tag an extended stay hotel from the description:
...
, but in the US apartment is used to
Mario Salvini wrote:
Richard Bullock schrieb:
Am I missing something, or can we not just assume that e.g.
each highway=residential has a speed limit consistent with urban areas in
that country - unless explicitly tagged otherwise
e.g. in the UK, highway=residential would be 30mph
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Ingo Lantschner
listen2...@lantschner.name wrote:
Am 21.05.2009 um 18:42 schrieb Adam Schreiber:
I created a symbol and some rules for the key/value tourism/
apartment.
I think you need to find a different key than apartment. It seems you
want to tag an
I use TrackMyJourney, which has OSM Maps, and you can use OSM based
routing and search online, with live updating. I use TMJ for all my
mapping at the moment.
If you are happy if small amounts of data, you may want to look at
GPSMid.
See
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com wrote:
A typical city here would look like all roads inside the built-up area
inside one relation, and when there are roads inside it with another
speed limit, tag those ways with maxspeed.
Jesus.
* Anyone who doesn't know what
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Richard Bullock rb...@cantab.net wrote:
Am I missing something,
No, you're not.
Cheers,
Andy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
I should have also said that I use a Sony Ericsson K850i. The K750i
will work, though it may run slowly when using the maps as well as the
logging.
Shaun
On 21 May 2009, at 23:00, Shaun McDonald wrote:
I use TrackMyJourney, which has OSM Maps, and you can use OSM based
routing and search
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Richard Bullock rb...@cantab.net wrote:
Am I missing something,
No, you're not.
I should expand that statement. No, you're not missing something, it's
a fairly straightforward problem
Am 21.05.2009 23:37, Adam Schreiber:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Ingo Lantschner
listen2...@lantschner.name wrote:
Am 21.05.2009 um 18:42 schrieb Adam Schreiber:
I created a symbol and some rules for the key/value tourism/
apartment.
I think you need to find a different key than
I am using GPSMid (http://gpsmid.sourceforge.net/) on SE W200i - I
don't have bluetooth GPS, so I use it only for displaying the map
(which it does quite fine), but it is also capable of using GPS
(should work with bluetooth and integrated cellphine GPSes), logging
tracks and making waypoints
Nic Roets wrote:
My opinion is that all defaults should be global. We should not have any
country or urban / rural specific defaults. It will mean most ways will need
a lot of extra tags. So we may need to improve the editors to make it easier
to add all those tags. For example give the
Unless aliens have started using Canada to teach their children
geometry, this seems like someone uploaded something that they
shouldn't have:
http://openstreetmap.org/browse/way/34892338
--
Jeff Ollie
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
I have a W760 (has an internal GPS) and TrekBuddy works for me for logging
purposes.
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Valent Turkovic
valent.turko...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I have lots of friends with SonyEricsson phones and I have one
bluetooth GPS dongle that I can give to them for making GPS
2009/5/22 Richard Bullock rb...@cantab.net:
Am I missing something, or can we not just assume that e.g.
each highway=residential has a speed limit consistent with urban areas in
that country - unless explicitly tagged otherwise
Actually, that wouldn't work where I live in Australia. Each
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
My opinion is that all defaults should be global. We should not have any
country or urban / rural specific defaults. It will mean most ways will need
a lot of extra tags. So we may need to improve the editors to make it easier
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Claudius claudiu...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 21.05.2009 23:37, Adam Schreiber:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Ingo Lantschner
listen2...@lantschner.name wrote:
Am 21.05.2009 um 18:42 schrieb Adam Schreiber:
I created a symbol and some rules for the key/value
http://ibood.com/nl/nl
Ik neem aan dat je hier ook de Openstreetmap kaarten op kunt gebruiken?
Sander
___
Talk-nl mailing list
Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Maarten Deen wrote:
Ben Laenen wrote:
Het feit dat er nog geen goeie manier is om te zeggen hoe de
bebouwde kom of snelheidszones juist liggen is een tijdelijk
probleem, want het zal eens moeten opgelost geraken.
Goh, en het wordt steeds gezegd dat de snelheid op
En we zijn live :)
http://xapi.openstreet.nl:8000/
De 'echte' XAPI code is nog niet geladen, maar ik weet dat mensen al
zitten te springen om het volgende te proberen. Dit is Cherokee/DBSlayer
voor een MonetDB5 database.
Voorlopig nog geen limieten... de eerste die een kruisproduct gaat
Stefan de Konink wrote:
Voorlopig nog geen limieten... de eerste die een kruisproduct gaat maken
zonder constraints weet ik te vinden. Dat is geen loos dreigement :)
Omdat ik me realiseerde dat niet ik maar Milo van Dogodigi de kosten
draagt voor dit fantastische project. En Cherokee
I have a nokia n810 which I have used on foot to edit a map in the
middle of the day.
I used osm2go:
http://maemo.org/downloads/product/OS2008/osm2go/
Which is actively developed, and lets you pick an area, download the osm
data for it, make offline changes (with the gps on) and then upload it
Hallo Adrian.
Am Mittwoch 20 Mai 2009 23:16:20 schrieb Adrian Stabiszewski:
das Projekt ist schon in Arbeit und heißt Amenity Editor. Wir testen
gerade noch die letzten Feinheiten und geben es wahrscheinlich im Laufe der
nächsten Woche frei.
Ich finde den Namen etwas abschreckend.
Vielleicht
Ist Google Maps ein Anbieter von Geodaten? Abgesehen von MapMaker haben
die doch ihre Daten nicht selbst erfasst?
Auch wenn sie sie nicht selbst erfasst haben, bieten sie den Zugang zu
diesen Daten (bzw. den daraus entstehenden Kacheln) für den privaten und
kommerziellen Gebrauch an.
Hallo,
Potlatch hat jetzt eine Save-Funktion und damit einhergehend eine
Moeglichkeit zur Konfliktloesung, falls jemand anders die gleichen Daten
schon geaendert hat. Auch die Nutzung von Changesets soll besser geloest
sein, und Kreuzungsnodes werden anders gezeichnet, damit man schnell
Also, ich habe Schwierigkeiten, die folgenden Dinge so umzusetzen, dass sich
der Relation Analyzer nicht beschwert.
Ich bearbeite den lokalen Rundweg durch die Altstadt. Da die Altstadt klein
ist,
muss man den Weg verwinkelt anlegen, damit das nicht so auffällt. In diesem
Rundweg sind auch
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
