Nominatim also uses data that is not in OSM. They did some imports into
their database. That's why there was a postcode 12 in Reet last year. They
removed that one. So it is possible to have postal code nodes that are not
in OSM, and which cannot be deleted in the normal way of course.
as a side
I think the boundary=postal_code makes a difference after all
compare
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=52527679(Waterkluiskaai)
which uses the postal code point
with
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=64725723(Bonheidensteenweg)
which uses the
Bart,
I just added a postal_code boundary for 2840 Rumst. And yes, both the
Hondstraat and Steenweg op Waarloos now get the correct postal code: 2840.
They had 2550 (from Kontich) before. So postal_code boundaries are the
solution for my nominatim problems.
regards
m
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at
.
regards
m
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
Bart,
I just added a postal_code boundary for 2840 Rumst. And yes, both the
Hondstraat and Steenweg op Waarloos now get the correct postal code: 2840.
They had 2550 (from Kontich) before. So postal_code
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be wrote:
On 05-12-13 22:57, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:52:31PM +0100, Marc Gemis wrote:
Since in Belgium the postal code areas coincide with village borders
I've read somewhere that Brussels has some
at 12:57 AM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
Bart,
I just added a postal_code boundary for 2840 Rumst. And yes, both the
Hondstraat and Steenweg op Waarloos now get the correct postal code: 2840.
They had
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Bart Van Lancker b...@vlweb.net wrote:
Okay, thanks. But there’s one more problem.
Both the deelgemeenten Ledeberg and Gentbrugge have the postal code 9050.
The same counts for Afsnee and Sint-Denijs Westrem. So, should I draw a new
boundary over the
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=23415
Allroads schreef op het Belgische forum:
Wie heeft er een aanvraag gedaan om deze informatie te verkrijgen.
http://www.verkeersbordendatabank.be/
Ik heb contact gehad en het ligt een beetje moeilijk, woon zelf niet in
Belgie.
De toegang
I think I did all the needed reverts. The tiles are being rerendered at the
moment.
I'll keep an eye on it, but feel free to contact me in case you see
anything weird
have a nice weekend
regards
m
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
This morning I got
Thanks a lot to everybody who contributed in one way or another to bring
the beast alive :-)
m
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Ben Abelshausen
ben.abelshau...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
The osm.be website is online!
Many many thanks to everyone who has helped, please report things that are
for those that want to keep track of which postal_code areas are already
defined: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1IE
this is a simple overpass query. there are better ways to do this, e.g.
restrict the query to Belgium instead of the current bounding box, or
creating a separate map with the postal
I would use whatever is on the busstop. or in case you cannot survey it,
whatever is in the DB of De Lijn.
Your rules also make sense, but I would then place PZ in the same category
as AZ.
And why AZ (without dots and U.Z. and the others with dots) ?
BTW, a similar discussion on the German
Is there somebody interested in a Google Hangout on using De Atlas der
Buurtwegen, as found on e.g. http://www.gisoost.be/atlasbw/ ?
It can be used to create the boundaries of the deelgemeentes. (admin level
9)
West-Vlaanderen seems to be complete. I did a bit in Antwerpen Province in
order to
I'm interested to see that...
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
I am game! While I was doing them around Leuven, I found the Improve Way
Accuracy mode very useful. It takes a bit of getting used to.
Jo
2013/12/9 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
I wonder whether there is a scenario that a non-native speaker sees the
abbreviation and wants to look up this abbreviation in OSM, but cannot find
it because only the full (expanded) name is in OSM.
If so, we would need both names in OSM (or another DB).
regards
m
p.s. I used to live in a
I once downloaded the shape or kmz file from
https://inventaris.onroerenderfgoed.be/faq/kaarten.
The problem is that I want to link it with information from wikipedia, so I
still need to continue with the wikipedia data.
I also don't know under which license they provide their kmz/shape file. I
What means freely available ? That you can use it for private projects ?
Or that you can copy it into OSM ? What are the licenses under which those
data sets are available ?
m
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:54:54PM +0100, Ben
: [algemeen]Licentie Shape file/ KMZ-file
Marc Gemis [marc.ge...@gmail.com] heeft een mail verzonden naar de algemene
beheerder met als onderwerp:
Licentie Shape file/ KMZ-file
Betreffende het objekt met id nummer:
== Begin bericht ==
Geachte,
onder welke licentie maken jullie de shape-file
I found this site of the UGent: http://www.hisgis.be/nl/start_nl.htm
unfortunately, the cannot provide the shape files due to license
restrictions. (I've contacted them)
m
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Wouter Hamelinck
wouter.hameli...@gmail.com wrote:
Why is everybody blaming OSMAND? As far as I know JOSM to give an
example won't deliver messages either...
latest version of JOSM shows a pop-up when you have unread messages
m
Hallo Chris,
since I'm the author of both series of houses that you refer to, I thought
it might be a good idea to give some background information.
Oud-Turnhout
- Data accumulated during a survey, aka a walk (along the regional walking
network)
- houses drawn using Bing aerial images
Begijnhof
Hallo Nyamuk,
welcome to the world of OSM. Good to see that you are already using/trying
JOSM, that's what many experienced users here are using as well. There is
some Potlatch knowledge available as well.
There are a number of projects going on:
- Import of addresses buildings in Brussels
-
The maps on osm.org do not show the max speed, lane information, max
height, speed camera's and so forth. In this presentation
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1F69PAR44JF3pBE1mBuv-8VaNmkyIOxxQhcAYEM_PuWo/edit#slide=id.pyou'll
find a number of links to maps that show some of that
The best I get with my Garmin Dakota 10 is 3-4m, but in narrow streets or
forests it might be worse. Another setting on a Dakota is the number of
tracking points. When you don't record enough points you will notice that
the track shows shortcuts on corners.
can't help with the osmtracker
Merk op dat http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle een afzonderlijke
lijn voor een track verkiest. Ook
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Cyclewaysgeeft
er de voorkeur aan als er een bord D7, D9 of D10 bij staat.
met vriendelijke groeten
m
2014-03-12 23:47
maar de verplichte vermelding ((c) OpenStreetMap contributors.) ontbreekt
wel.
zie http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
m.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Karel Adams fa348...@skynet.be wrote:
http://www.belgocontrol.be/website/warningsChartGeo.do?cmd=whtmlcharttoday
Enkel de
ik had een screenshot moeten nemen. Nu zie ik ze ook rechtsonder. :-)
2014-03-13 10:34 GMT+01:00 Karel Adams fa348...@skynet.be:
Marc Gemis wrote:
maar de verplichte vermelding ((c) OpenStreetMap contributors.) ontbreekt
wel.
Nee hoor, die staat er wel degelijk. Lijkt wel een beetje
dat was bij mij de eerste keer dus ook het geval. 2de keer kwam de
copyright er wel door, te samen met de panning en zoom controls links boven
2014-03-13 11:48 GMT+01:00 Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be:
Hier is de screenshot ,links boven, amper te zien ...
http://m.bitless.be/img/belgo.png
Mijn huidig projectje is om lanes en turn:lanes toe te voegen om zo
hopelijk de navigatie wat te verbeteren. Ook al om wat minder kleur te
brengen in
http://www.itoworld.com/map/147?lon=4.07618lat=51.14254zoom=11fullscreen=true
Nu ben ik bezig met de N70 en vraag me af of deze weg wel overal
begrepen dat het enkel op nodes mocht.
Sindsdien gebruik ik het om aan te duiden dat twee wegen die kort bij
mekaar eindigen maar gescheiden zijn door een gracht, heuvel, bomenrij,
enz. niet op mekaar aansluiten.
Guy Vanvuchelen
*Van:* Marc Gemis [mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com]
*Verzonden
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com
Date: Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:56 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] High res DigitalGlobe imagery open for tracing through
Mapbox Satellite
To: Talk t...@openstreetmap.org
Cc: Kevin Bullock kbull...@digitalglobe.com
Effective
I always download a gmapsupp.img-file from http://garmin.openstreetmap.nlor
http://extract.bbbike.org/ that I place immediately on my Garmin (Dakota
10).
The first one is tile based, the second one allows you to cut out any piece
and in much more different styles.
So I have no need to BaseCamp to
You can rename the gmapsupp.img to e.g. belgium.img and then you can place
multiple maps on your device. Depends on the age of the device, but it
works for a Dakota 10.
I don't remember whether I downloaded the img-files from garmin... or
extract...
On the Dutch forum there was some discussion
split the way where it enters and leaves the building. so you have nodes on
the intersection of way and building. tag the way part inside the building
as tunnel=building_passage
regards
m
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Bart Vanherck vherckb...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I wanted to map a
I forgot to include an example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251481930
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
split the way where it enters and leaves the building. so you have nodes
on the intersection of way and building. tag the way part inside
Strava has released a tool that shows the tracks of their users (cyclist,
runners, etc.) The users can also indicate where the routing goes wrong.
Here is an example
http://labs.strava.com/routing-errors/#1000/16/4.01603/50.88423 near
Denderhoutem. Some missing paths.
Is there someone on this
Hallo,
Ik vraag me af of het OK is het volgende kruispunt te vereenvoudigen via
turn:lanes : http://osm.org/go/0Ejo5_fqb--?way=51738440
I wonder whether it's ok to simplify the following crossing with turn:lanes
tagging: http://osm.org/go/0Ejo5_fqb--?way=51738440
met vriendelijke groeten
:48 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com:
Hallo,
Ik vraag me af of het OK is het volgende kruispunt te vereenvoudigen
via
turn:lanes : http://osm.org/go/0Ejo5_fqb--?way=51738440
I wonder whether it's ok to simplify the following crossing with
turn:lanes tagging: http
Hello Corentin,
I mapped a lot of heritage based on the wikipedia pages. All monuments in
de Province of Antwerp, and the cities Ghent, Bruge and Leuven are done. I
stopped while I was busy with Hasselt. Because I'm not sure about the
license of wikipedia anymore.
Back to your topic. I would not
I have the following problem with Nominatim:
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=36580812
It tells me that is part of the neighbourhood Bosstraat. This is not
true, but it is the nearest neighbourhood node it can find in Boom.
In order to fix this I have to draw a border
Hallo,
Ik heb het toch goed voor als ik meen dat Jaagpad niet de naam is, maar
een functionele beschrijving ? Onlangs heeft iemand een aantal van die
paden expliciet Jaagpad genoemd in mijn buurt, bv
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/22548349
Terug er af die naam ?
met vriendelijke
Ik heb me al dikwijls afgevraagd of er daar inderdaad een pad loopt aan de
andere kant van Zemst. Nog nooit geprobeerd er te wandelen.
Nog niet zo heel lang geleden is er een reportage geweest op Radio 2 over
de jaagpaden. Dat dit dienstwegen van nv De Scheepvaart zijn, waarop zij
voetgangers en
verder te verdiepen vind ik.
smoothness=bad is misschien nog te gebruiken, maar ook 'trail_visibility'
vind ik hier niet direct geschikt ( zie
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility )
Mvg,
Glenn
On 01-06-14 19:59, Marc Gemis wrote:
Ik heb me al dikwijls afgevraagd of er
Sommige provincies hebben de grenzen van de deelgemeentes ook op die
kaarten gezet. En die grenzen heb je nodig om de postcode gebieden in kaart
te brengen.
Het gaat dus niet enkel om de wegen en paden.
mvg
m
2014-06-02 12:21 GMT+02:00 Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com:
On Monday 02 June 2014
I don't understand the real value of survey:date or whatever other key you
want to use to indicate the last survey date. Sometimes things do not
change for many years, sometimes they change the day after the survey was
done.
I'm struggling with this resurvey item as well. I've been mapping my
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:01 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
What if the previous mapper doesn't survey the same things I map ? What's
the use of the survey date in that case?
That is the point I raised that unlike source=... survey:date applies to
all aspect of a map
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 7:02 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Curiously, Key:survey:date
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:survey:date does not define the
date format at all.
Because it is mostly a Keymapper log, it's factually usually ISO, but, one
can (of course) find;
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:13 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you use *source=survey 2014-06 TEC 2014-04* in bus stops as I
recommend, you will both comply with the source requirement and be sure to
find the indication that they contain your file's data and can be deleted
is not included
the source should a) contain some reference to TEC, b) any aerial image you
have used (probably Bing).
regards
m
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:55 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2014-06-17 09:21, Marc Gemis wrote :
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:13 PM, André Pirard
Binnenkort vindt in De Schorre te Boom het Tomorrowfestival plaats.
Gedurende dit festival krigen bepaalde ingangen een naam, bv. Dienstingang
1
Nu heeft er iemand een aantal van die namen toegevoegd aan OSM (
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/22959316).
De node heeft enkel de tag
Ik weet dat het inderdaad voor wegenwerken enz. niet echt aangeraden wordt.
In dit geval zal ik wel eens kijken of er een geschikte barrier= tag bij
kan, want nu is het niet echt zinvol imho.
2014-06-23 8:08 GMT+02:00 Karel Adams fa348...@skynet.be:
On 23-06-14 05:59, Marc Gemis wrote
During the meetup in April in Antwerp, Jo asked for my collection of links
that I have collected over the past few years. I finally found an easy way
to share them. So here they are:
http://share.xmarks.com/folder/bookmarks/56erXxFjfE
No guarantees on the availability of the websites. Maybe you
The problem is that I don't have a easy way to export part (a folder and
subfolders) of my bookmark list in Chrome. If you know a way, please let me
know.
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 7:56 AM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2014-06-26 21:40, Marc Gemis wrote :
During the meetup
I know I can export them, but I just didn't want to start editing the
exported file (call it laziness :-) ).
I search the internet and found that Firefox allows you to export folders,
and that Chrome doesn't
regards
m
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
In the
Volgens mij is deze situatie weer veel te complex getekend. Er geen
fysische scheiding, enkel een witte lijn en dan hoef je geen 2
enkelrichtingswegen te tekenen.
Aangezien er bovendien massa's buslijnen overlopen is, vind ik het teveel
werk om er even tijdens een lunchpauze aan te beginnen:
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 2:41 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's a pity to see so little routes in Wallonia, to see the existing ones
poorly documented and to claim that OSM wants that despite its do it as
you like with fuzziness basic principle.
One of the principles of OSM
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/ (blog entry:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ikonor/diary/23329)
regards
m
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
-- Dutch below --
Sorry, I bring this up again, but please be careful by introducing dual
carriageways.
Look at http://osrm.at/8Qc , the routing makes a unneeded big detour to
get to the house on the left side because of a dual carriage way. Note that
I have updated OSM, so the underlying map no
for who is not following OSM-talk
-- Forwarded message --
From: Johan Van de Wauw johan.vandew...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:11 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] FOSDEM 2015: proposal for a geospatial devroom
To: OSGeo Discussions disc...@lists.osgeo.org, t...@openstreetmap.org,
Updated version of Quality Assurance Tools script for JOSM.Looks
promising, especially when you work a lot with KeepRight or Osmose
see blog http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/coso/diary/23466 for details
regards
m
___
Talk-be mailing list
Hierbij denk ik onmiddellijk aan Overpass API. Deze afzonderlijke databank
is net ontworpen voor dit soort vragen.
De API kan aangestuurd worden via http, dus met wget in een shell-script
kan je het automatiseren. Je kan ook nog het output formaat controleren
zodat je een geoJson, csv file,
dan wel nog wget en eventueel 7zip installeren en eventueel
aanpassen als je het liever op Linux wil laten werken.
Jo
Op 8 augustus 2014 08:06 schreef Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com:
Hierbij denk ik onmiddellijk aan Overpass API. Deze afzonderlijke
databank is net ontworpen voor dit soort
Allroads (Nederlander) schreef op het forum (
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=23415):
Ik woon te ver weg de grens om persoonlijk even langs te gaan.
dit kreeg ik als bericht van. verkeersboden mow.vlaanderen.be ik stelde de
vraag als privaat persoon.
De toegang tot de
The default (Mapnik) renderer changed not too long ago. It used to be the
case that everything with a name tag was rendered. This is no longer the
case and might cause the issue you noticed.
Since a castle is a building I see no problem to add a tag
building=yes/residential/...
regards
m
On
passed with his knowledge, you'll also notice that 'heritage'
tags will be added, (Escada) Marc Gemis knows more about how to go about
this correctly.
Adding Historic=yes is not a bad idea either. (map renderers will take
this into account).
Good luck on completing this.
Glenn
Jo
2014
https://twitter.com/JLZIMMERMANN/status/501356038499868672/photo/1
regards
m
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
with amenity=bench nowadays. For the
waste_basket too.
Jo
2014-08-20 7:40 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com:
https://twitter.com/JLZIMMERMANN/status/501356038499868672/photo/1
regards
m
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
.
regards
m
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 6:42 AM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2014-08-20 07:40, Marc Gemis wrote :
https://twitter.com/JLZIMMERMANN/status/501356038499868672/photo/1
The answers to those questions about our conventions should be found here,
Marc
and wheelchair.
Cheers,
Jo
2014-08-21 7:24 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com:
Just to make it clear: the picture is not about tagging bus lines, it's
about tagging bus stops. You refer to a page on the routes.
Furthermore. it was not a question, I just found it a nice summary for
what's
on the actual route:
http://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Ad%27s_Path
Cheers,
Jo
2014-08-21 9:17 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com:
I'll agree that the things mentioned in the picture are often
micromapping. But on the other hand how does an international app knows all
this when there is no OSM
Hallo,
from time to time I map some street cabinets (
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_cabinet )
One type of cabinets that I see regularly have a reference number similar
to 03HEM0/256 TYCAB 18 1L, i.e. always TYCAB 18 1L at the end.
some pictures:
Bedankt, Karel
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Karel Adams fa348...@skynet.be wrote:
Ni twijfelen: BELGACOM.
KA
On 05-09-14 10:29, Marc Gemis wrote:
Hallo,
from time to time I map some street cabinets (
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_cabinet )
One
for Belgium:
http://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countriescountry=Belgium
never more than 60 mappers / day in the past year.
regards
m
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Een afzonderlijk fietspad is voor mij ok, als alle verbindingen met de
zijstraten en opritten opstaan en bicycle=no of use_sidepath op de
hoofdbaan.
Ik denk dat ze in Nederland en Duitsland ook meestal afzonderlijke
fietspaden mappen. Maar de situaties en wetgeving zijn daar misschien wel
net iets
Dit vind ik niet echt een argument, dan mag je ook geen dual carriageways
meer tekenen, want daar ontbreken de verbindingen met zijstraten soms ook.
2014-09-08 22:31 GMT+02:00 Wouter Hamelinck wouter.hameli...@gmail.com:
Enkel aan dat kruispunt met de R16 zou ik het fietspad apart tekenen.
Je
wat doe je met een straat die echt de grens is ? Afzonderlijke nodes maar
de wegen over elkaar ?
voorbeeld: http://osm.org/go/0EpG_cM4m?way=22920473
feitelijk stemt het stukje voor huisnummers 44-48 niet de werkelijkheid
overeen. Beide gemeentes zijn verantwoordelijk voor de helft van de rijweg.
geocoders het wel juist doen. Maar door een straat volledig binnen de grens
van 1 gemeente te leggen, kan geen enkele geocoder de straat terugvinden in
de andere gemeente.
groeten
m
2014-09-09 20:20 GMT+02:00 Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com:
Op 9 september 2014 14:48 schreef Marc Gemis
Ik heb al enkele prive berichten uitgewisseld gehad met Johan over dit
topic en ook op het NL-forum hebben we het erover gehad. Naar aanleiding
van deze communicatie heb ik al een paar junctions verplaatst naar de
plek die de wiki beschrijft. Omdat ik zelf niet in de mogelijkheid ben om
foto's te
Zo te zien doen we het nog niet zo slecht in België
The numbers are not too bad for Belgium
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/baditaflorin/diary/23729
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
De Route dokter [1] van de wandelknooppunten en fietsknooppunten maakt
gebruik van een OSM kaart. Hierop ontbrak tot voor kort het OSM copyright
(blijkbaar na een wijziging in hun tileserver).
Na een mailtje eergisteren naar de website is het probleem verholpen. Het
zou nu dus moeten staan op het
.
(oh, and if you want cooperation for all Belgian highways, better also put
your message in English or French).
Regards,
Sander
Op 10 september 2014 09:13 schreef Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com:
Ik heb al enkele prive berichten uitgewisseld gehad met Johan over dit
topic en ook op het NL
...@gmail.com
wrote:
Op 10 september 2014 17:45 schreef Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com:
Welcome back, Sander,
did you take a sabbatical away from OSM ? :-)
Sortof. Got occupied with other stuff.
You could tag destination on the way after the junction, which is
simplier, but then you do
The GPS in my car says something like take the A5 towards Brno. It always
tells the ref and one of the names on the sign. Furthermore it displays a
sign with the ref and some names. Typically more than one name, but not all
of them I think.
and it displays the number of lanes in that direction
information is displayed, which is
spoken, etc. There is no reason for a mapper to limit the data just because
she thinks that it would confuse some application.
regards
m
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
The GPS in my car says something like take the A5
because that
annoying dutch voice drives me nuts.
(brand with the star)
Glenn
On 11-09-14 07:08, Marc Gemis wrote:
The GPS in my car says something like take the A5 towards Brno. It
always tells the ref and one of the names on the sign. Furthermore it
displays a sign with the ref and some
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com
wrote:
I also think that destination information on motorways is nice, but not
completely neccesary. OsmAnd nicely tells you on which lane to drive, and
does this just by counting lane numbers (nothing fancy like joining to
I've been trying to map destinations on primary roads as well. Therefore I
asked the following question on the help forum a couple of weeks ago, but
never got an answer:
I want to tag the destinations on a sign like
http://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2014/20140810-Herentals/i-ZQhq2MT/A It is
located
%27s_so_funny)
Cheers, Johan
2014-09-11 12:04 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com:
I've been trying to map destinations on primary roads as well. Therefore
I asked the following question on the help forum a couple of weeks ago, but
never got an answer:
I want to tag the destinations on a sign
Adding addr:street to a road, is something I've done accidentally as well.
As far as I know it's name on a road/street, addr:street on buildings
and POIs.
IMHO you can remove the addr:street tag
regards
m
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be wrote:
Hi,
I
Sstt, it (bicycle=yes) was added by Glenn in
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/17185921 , see
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24301581/history :-)
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be wrote:
Will do. There is no cycleway at all, it's a small street, barely
Would you believe when I say that I checked, just to make sure I didn't
make the mistake ? :-)
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be wrote:
@marc If you wouldn't be as ironic as you where I wouldn't have noticed
this. Tx!
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be wrote:
Last week I corrected something similar like that made by a guy called
'escada'. Not joking here, decided to keep it under the rug this time..
But that was about 4 years old. Mine is from a year ago.
I would keep a
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be wrote:
This looks to be a bigger problem than I thought.TAA is doing this
everywhere. Checking the wiki, this isn't even wrong actually.
I quote: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
A way with highway=* and the
Hallo Marc,
welkom hier (ik heb je naar hier doorverwezen vanuit het forum).
Voor grapphopper lijkt de routering nu in orde te zijn: zie
https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=51.01287%2C3.928878point=Aard%2C%209260%2C%20Wichelen%2C%20Belgiumvehicle=footelevation=truelayer=Lyrk
Ik ga niet in gaan
Zou hij dit tag verwijderd hebben om de routering voor fietsers op een
Garmin toe te laten ?
m.
2014-09-17 12:44 GMT+02:00 Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be:
Daarvoor dient de bycicle=dismount tag voor, die heeft user JanFI
verwijderd 5 maand geleden. Helaas was die tag juist.
de trappen en geen verbodsbord,
dus je kan als voetganger met de fiets aan de hand erover.
https://www.google.com/maps/@51.0082116,3.8818759,3a,16.6y,287.65h,84.7t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1s_i2yhktclxX4dsevtcaJKw!2e0
Gewoon fixen denk ik en niet van wakker liggen!
Glenn
On 17-09-14 12:50, Marc
, zelfs moet fietsen ;- )
Glenn
On 17-09-14 14:10, Marc Gemis wrote:
dus handrail=yes, ramp=yes, ramp:bicycle=yes toevoegen :-)
zie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsteps
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk
Vorig jaar heb ik tesamen met Jo een 5-tal hangouts (video conferenties)
gehouden over verschillende topics. Daar kwamen bv. het in kaart brengen
van huizen met de tools in JOSM aan bod. Jammer genoeg heb ik daar nu
voorlopig geen tijd voor.
Via email is het allemaal wat moeilijker uit te leggen,
Marc,
hierbij nog 2 links die kunnen helpen bij het mappen van huizen en
huisnummers:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Escada/JOSM_and_Housenumbers
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Gilbert54/JOSM
Die 2de is vooral interessant omdat die uitlegt hoe je de betere (en
recentere)
Très intéressant ! Merci
2014-09-23 17:31 GMT+02:00 eMerzh merz...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I've recieved recently a topo guide of Brussels where the maps were
based on OSM...
More info on french only (sorry) on my blog...
J'ai reçu récemment un topo guide des sentier GR a Bruxelles...
A ma
301 - 400 of 1573 matches
Mail list logo
