Dobar prvi post! Ne znam zašto se nitko ne javlja, a svi se slažemo da
moramo srediti te biciklističke tagove.
Sviđa mi se simetričnost highway=path taga koji nije niti footway niti
cycleway. Ali ne sviđa mi se to što smo path do sada koristili za footway
koji nije betoniran. Znači zemljane
how come our acceptance is rather low?
http://odbl.de/
There are few large editors, have they not all agreed to it, or some
disagree?
Andre
On 3:59 AM, maning sambale wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Michael Collinsonm...@ayeltd.biz
Date: Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:39 AM
Hi,
My name is Marc Gemis. I'm new to OpenStreetMap. Since I'm using
OpenFietsMap on my Garmin device and I hope to give something back.
I saw that in my area (Reet (Rumst)) a number of Buurtwegen (BW) en
Voetwegen (VW) are not on the map. I could also add a number of paths in the
Park van Boom
Hi,
Welcome !
If you need help, just ask the list.
Julien
PS: If you want to meet other OSM'ers in Belgium :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Activities#Upcoming_activities
Le 15/04/2011 13:10, Marc Gemis a écrit :
Hi,
My name is Marc Gemis. I'm new to OpenStreetMap.
Use potlatch 2 (simple) choose among the path's the generic path
Interesting discussion to help a newbie ;-)
2011/4/15 Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com
Jo wrote:
Hi Marc,
Your help will be much appreciated! Voetwegen are usually tagged as:
highway=footway
name=Voetweg 22
bicycle=yes
He won't be a newbie for long, with our 'stoomcursus'...
Polyglot
2011/4/15 Ivo De Broeck ivo.debro...@gmail.com
Use potlatch 2 (simple) choose among the path's the generic path
Interesting discussion to help a newbie ;-)
2011/4/15 Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com
Jo wrote:
Hi Marc,
Ivo De Broeck wrote:
Use potlatch 2 (simple) choose among the path's the generic path
Interesting discussion to help a newbie ;-)
(off-topic) That simple way of editing in Potlatch2 is just asking for
trouble. I advise everyone to learn and use the raw tags from the start for
things like
Hi Marc,
In JOSM, you can use aerial photography on the background by selecting:
Luchtfotografie/Bing Sat
in the menu.
Then you can align your ways on those as well.
As the name I would have put 'Buurtweg 23'. We don't use abbreviations in
the names. (Except if BW23 is what you actually found
Hi Jo,
The signs of the buurtwegen en the voetwegen always have the abbreviated
name BW23 or VW51, followed by the name of the residential road to which the
are leading (and thus different on both sides). I'll look into aligning the
BW23 with the aerial photo
regards
m
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at
Hi and Welcome!
I assume you use the Atlas for looking up 'trage wegen' (slow roads)
Then it is as said in full Voetweg (sentier) or Buurtweg (chemin)
followed by a number eg Voetweg 23
Example of Sint-Agatha-Rode (and area around)
Hi,
Tags are good.
Except segregated = no is only to be used with footway and cycleway.
So, delete this tag.
The name in full, name = Buurtweg 23
I don't know where you get this BW23 from. It is not indicated as such
in the atlas:
http://gis1.provant.be/Geoloketten/geoloket.jsp?geoloketid=55
I see, then it's done differently in the province of Antwerp, than here in
Vlaams-Brabant...
2011/4/15 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
Hi Jo,
The signs of the buurtwegen en the voetwegen always have the abbreviated
name BW23 or VW51, followed by the name of the residential road to which the
Hi,
(Thread moved over from talk)
On 04/15/2011 05:55 PM, Kai Krueger wrote:
In addition, it is imho not clear that not some of the many imports listed
as Attribution licensed wouldn't fall into this category, too (rather than
in category 3 as CC-BY).
To be clear, my category 3 was meant for
On 15 April 2011 19:35, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
In addition, it is imho not clear that not some of the many imports listed
as Attribution licensed wouldn't fall into this category, too (rather
than
in category 3 as CC-BY).
I haven't seen this list so cannot comment.
[snip]
Hi,
On 04/15/2011 09:16 PM, Francis Davey wrote:
In addition, it is imho not clear that not some of the many
imports listed as Attribution licensed wouldn't fall into this
category, too (rather than in category 3 as CC-BY).
I haven't seen this list so cannot comment.
Sorry for that. I had
Mikel,
On 04/11/2011 05:27 PM, Mikel Maron wrote:
http://brainoff.com/weblog/2011/04/11/1635
In the following message, all quotes are from your blog post.
I've given this matter some thought and I think while your concerns are
legitimate, you are perhaps overreacting a bit.
OpenStreetMap
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:08 AM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
So my understanding now, from Francis' comment, is that CC-By-SA and
CC-By are not compatible (you can't accept the CTs if you've
contributed data obtained under those licenses, without infringing
those licenses?),
On 15 April 2011 00:38, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
If data is tainted in a way that makes in incompatible with the currently
used license then it will have to be removed in order not to put the project
at risk (e.g. data copied from proprietary sources). This is independent of
the
- Original Message -
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
To: David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday
Hi,
David Murn wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:38:30 +0200
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
So I chose a slightly humorous response, treating Anthony as if he
really were an innocent newbie.
I didn't expect that I would have to explain the humour, but I guess
I should have known better.
Humour is quite
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:49:20 +0200
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Eric Marsden wrote:
It is not clear to me, from your message or from what I have read
on the wiki, whether choosing Decline is a irreversible decision,
or whether one would still be able later to accept
Hi,
On 04/15/2011 10:13 AM, David Groom wrote:
There's also a third kind of tainted that sits in the middle of these
two, namely data that has e.g. been released CC-BY. Such data looks
compatible at first, but closer inspection (see current discussion on
legal-talk) reveals that CC-BY
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 04:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
ThomasB toba0...@yahoo.de wrote:
Mitrovica was deleted by uboot
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7348595
could you please stop publicly blaming others for mistakes that you
personally has made?
ubot has deleted 15 ways and add some 60.
Hi,
On 04/15/2011 01:14 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
I don't like 'duplicate node removing' scripts or bots. Duplicate nodes
may well have a function, or may not be duplicate at all.
+1. Anyone who plans to indiscriminately fix duplicate nodes without
actually looking at the situation (e.g.
Le 15/04/2011 13:24, Frederik Ramm a écrit :
Hi,
On 04/15/2011 01:14 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
I don't like 'duplicate node removing' scripts or bots. Duplicate nodes
may well have a function, or may not be duplicate at all.
+1. Anyone who plans to indiscriminately fix duplicate nodes
- Original Message -
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday
Hi,
On 04/15/2011 10:13 AM, David Groom wrote:
There's also a third kind of
Johnwhelan is the account name. Unfortunately I have made a fair number of
edits. The concern is I'm not comfortable that all of these meet the new
standard but I'm unsure which ones do and which don't. I'm happy to reenter
data following the new guidelines. I'm not happy to have some one
On 15 April 2011 13:28, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
Johnwhelan is the account name. Unfortunately I have made a fair number of
edits. The concern is I'm not comfortable that all of these meet the new
standard but I'm unsure which ones do and which don't. I'm happy to reenter
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Do you expect any positive outcome from this, or is it for moral reasons
that you choose this course of action? There are regions in OSM where a
visible no vote will lead to your data being re-surveyed and
this occurred to me while surveying speed limits in a somewhat rural
part of the US.
are any of the routing engines looking at the surface tag as part of
their decision making?
i ask this because in NY, the default speed limit in rural areas is 55
on all roads. there are numerous unpaved roads
Hello Richard,
Gosmore looks at maxspeed and tracktype.
I did not use surface, because I am under the impression that it is
possible to drive fast on properly maintained dirt roads in dryer
regions.
Regards,
Nic
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
this
2011/4/15 Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net:
i ask this because in NY, the default speed limit in rural areas is 55
on all roads.
highway=unclassified
name=Mead Road
maxspeed=55 mph
surface=dirt
I suggest you also add source:maxspeed=US:NY:rural or sth. similar to
the roads with no
On 4/15/11 10:53 AM, Nic Roets wrote:
Hello Richard,
Gosmore looks at maxspeed and tracktype.
I did not use surface, because I am under the impression that it is
possible to drive fast on properly maintained dirt roads in dryer
regions.
interesting. i haven't been setting tracktype because
Frederik Ramm wrote:
It would be very hard to construct something of that kind. The most
common thing is certainly going to be the above third case, where you
have the right to distribute data under CC-BY-SA or maybe even ODbL or
maybe you even have the right to distribute it under any
On 4/15/11 11:30 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/4/15 Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net:
i ask this because in NY, the default speed limit in rural areas is 55
on all roads.
highway=unclassified
name=Mead Road
maxspeed=55 mph
surface=dirt
I suggest you also add
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
He knows perfectly well, because he has been told a thousand
times, that one of the countries where CC-BY-SA doesn't work for our data is
his country of residence, the USA.
Being told something is not equivalent to
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Grant Slater
openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
The revert script used to remove Anthony's edits (which were traced
from Google) was a basic revert script which only used API methods.
There were also mistakes made like reverting the items anthony had
deleted
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
David Murn wrote:
Out of interest Grant, what other large-scale open source projects have
changed their licence the way that OSM has? In fact, changed their
licence full-stop..?
Wikipedia went from GFDL to
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
CC-BY-SA works exactly as intended. In fact, the
license even explicitly states its intent: Nothing in this License
is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any uses free from copyright
or rights arising from limitations or
You are assuming that all dirt roads will be well-maintained, and that all dirt
roads are in dry regions. Both assumptions are false. Most of the eastern
half of the USA, and the Pacific Northwest of the USA, get plenty of rainfall,
and even the dryer regions get some rainfall, some of it
Hi,
On 04/15/2011 05:55 PM, Kai Krueger wrote:
I thought that the new CTs were supposed to fix this issue
[...]
I have answered on legal-talk.
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 2011-04-14 21:18, Alex Ruddick wrote:
If NEII's (and others) are removed, we can add the United States to
Australia as 'countries the OSMF is willing to sacrifice.'
I'm not afraid that NEII's contributions are lost because he states on
his user page: All of my edits are released into the
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:36:34 +0200
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 04/15/2011 05:55 PM, Kai Krueger wrote:
I thought that the new CTs were supposed to fix this issue
[...]
I have answered on legal-talk.
Bye
Frederik
Frederick, it has occurred to me that if you
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:36:55 -0400
Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
this occurred to me while surveying speed limits in a somewhat rural
part of the US.
are any of the routing engines looking at the surface tag as part of
their decision making?
i ask this because in NY, the
At 2011-04-12 11:56, Michael Collinson wrote:
This is to let you know the license
change process is moving to Phase 3 [1] very shortly.
What exactly will be done with the existing data, and when? Understanding
what happens to objects and their parents/siblings/children based on the
license
What worries me here is that there are all these versions of the document,
the licenses etc. How are you going to deal with different people agreeing
to different contracts at different times?
mike
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:08 AM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.comwrote:
On 14 April 2011
oops think I sent this to talk-IT too...
Original Message
Subject: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: Hoping you can point me in the right
direction.
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:58:25 -0700
From: Steve Coast st...@asklater.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Original Message
Alan,
On 04/15/2011 11:01 PM, Alan Mintz wrote:
What exactly will be done with the existing data, and when?
Understanding what happens to objects and their
parents/siblings/children based on the license acceptance of the
original creator/intermediate editors/last editor is key to deciding
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Thus it doesn't make any sense to say that you want to base your agreement
or non-agreement to the CT on whatever plans there may or may not be for
dealing with objects that have been touched by many people.
How else
On 15 April 2011 23:21, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
At what point was the entire (active) OSM community asked if they wanted to
relicense their data? If they haven't (I certainly wasn't) then when will
we? Is this accept/decline that vote? If so, how do I vote no? How do I vote
yes but
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 April 2011 23:21, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
At what point was the entire (active) OSM community asked if they wanted
to
relicense their data? If they haven't (I certainly wasn't) then when will
we? Is
On 16 April 2011 00:07, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for asking me (if this were a vote my answer would be No, but in
the interest of moving on from this nonsense and keeping data flowing I'll
eventually say Yes), but the important part of my question was everyone
else -- the
On 16 April 2011 01:29, Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
This licence change now gives every mapper the means of undermining
the map through withholding of their own data, once freely given and
now very likely a foundation of data created by other mappers, also in
good faith. I
Dermot McNally wrote:
FWIW I would have favoured earlier specific requests for a vote, but
it's basically been an impossible position for the LWG from what I can
see as an outsider.
No, the vote part really isn't that difficult. Wikipedia managed to hold a
vote on their licensing change.
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 20:36 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 04/15/2011 05:55 PM, Kai Krueger wrote:
I thought that the new CTs were supposed to fix this issue
[...]
I have answered on legal-talk.
We dont care if you answered on a podcast sent to the moon. The
question was asked
2011/4/16 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au:
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 20:36 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I have answered on legal-talk.
that disagree and believe the issue is of great enough importance to not
be hidden away.
it is not hidden away, and you don't even have to be subscribed to
On 16 April 2011 00:36, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
i ask this because in NY, the default speed limit in rural areas is 55
on all roads. there are numerous unpaved roads (dirt, gravel) which
do not have posted speed limits, but where driving at 55 is not
reasonable unless
On 16 April 2011 01:30, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest you also add source:maxspeed=US:NY:rural or sth. similar to
the roads with no explicit maxspeed sign.
Well he said 55mph is the default maximum for unsigned roads, wouldn't
it be more useful for routing software
On 4/15/11 11:16 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 16 April 2011 00:36, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
i ask this because in NY, the default speed limit in rural areas is 55
on all roads. there are numerous unpaved roads (dirt, gravel) which
do not have posted speed limits, but where
On 16 April 2011 13:25, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
what i'm after are parameters so that the routing engines present
rational results to drivers who aren't me. so why don't we focus on
the actual problem in front of us instead of posturing about our
driving skills.
Well you
On 16 April 2011 13:43, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 April 2011 13:25, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
what i'm after are parameters so that the routing engines present
rational results to drivers who aren't me. so why don't we focus on
the actual problem in
LEnnard,
Ik voel mij niet in de positie om jouw noeste arbeid in twijfel te trekken.
Ik was echter niet in de positie (op het werk) om in JOSm te kijken. Wel zag
ik op de map dat het verkeerd was.
Bedankt voor het fiksen.
Was Tavernses dankbaar voor de reverts? ;-)
Groet
Robert
On 15-4-2011 21:58, Robert Elsenaar wrote:
Ik voel mij niet in de positie om jouw noeste arbeid in twijfel te
trekken. Ik was echter niet in de positie (op het werk) om in JOSm te
kijken. Wel zag ik op de map dat het verkeerd was.
Bedankt voor het fiksen.
Was Tavernses dankbaar voor de reverts?
Someone local to this guy want to speak with him?
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:58:25 -0700
From: Steve Coast st...@asklater.com
To: t...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: Hoping you can point me in the right
direction.
Original Message
An Australian Bureau of Statistics initiative to help drive
collaboration between students, developers and national and
international statistical agencies.
http://data.gov.au/2770/contest-abs-codeplay/
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:21:59 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
An Australian Bureau of Statistics initiative to help drive
collaboration between students, developers and national and
international statistical agencies.
http://data.gov.au/2770/contest-abs-codeplay/
that
Pessoal,
Recebi hoje um link com uma série de vídeos falando sobre
geoprocessamento. É bem interessante..
Fala sobre o episódio do Haiti..
http://geospatialrevolution.psu.edu/
--
Djavan Fagundes
E-mail | xmpp: dja...@comum.org
http://djavan.comum.org/blog/
http://butequeiro.comum.org/
Oi Mauro,
Abaixo está o link com todas as cidades
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/Brasil_250_Cidades/Lista_Completa_de_Cidades
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/Brasil_250_Cidades/Lista_Completa_de_Cidades
Você pode buscar as coordenadas digitando os
koppenho schrieb:
Hallo *,
wie taggt man am besten folgende addr:housenumber-Angaben:
1. Hausnummer mit Buchstabenzusatz: Trage ich immer ohne Leerzeichen
zwischen Nummer und Buchstabe ein.
2. Hausnummer mit Zusatz Einhalb: 42 1/2? Das ist vermutlich ok,
aber kommt damit eine Zielort-Suche
Hallo Andreas.
Soweit ich bisher gelesen und selbst getan habe, tagge ich die
Hausnummern unter addr:housenumber so, wie sie auf dem Schild bzw. in
der Adresse steht.
Hausnummern mit Zusatz folgen schon national in Deutschland keinen
einheitlichen Regeln - da gibt es 42 1/2, 1 a, 1 A, 1a, 1A
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Rainer Knaepper wrote:
Knuffig ist, daß ich einer rechtsverbindlichen Vereinbarung zustimmen
soll, die ich nicht verstehe.
Es gibt inoffizelle Uebersetzungen. Wenn Du auf die Wikiseite zu den
Contributor Terms schaust
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:07:42AM +0200, koppenho wrote:
Hallo *,
wie taggt man am besten folgende addr:housenumber-Angaben:
1. Hausnummer mit Buchstabenzusatz: Trage ich immer ohne Leerzeichen
zwischen Nummer und Buchstabe ein.
2. Hausnummer mit Zusatz Einhalb: 42 1/2? Das ist
Hallo Kolossos,
ich weiss meine ursprüngliche Anfrage ist schon lange her, aber bis
jetzt hatte ich leider noch keine Zeit mich mit Openlayers zu befassen.
Gibt es zufällig eine eteas umfangreichere Beschreibung, zu dieser Lösung?
Grüße
hike39
Am 09.10.2010 00:24, schrieb Kolossos:
Schau mal:
yobiSource yobisou...@googlemail.com wrote:
ich erstelle gerade SLD Styles für Geoserver und orientiere mich dabei
am deutschen Mapnik Kartenstil.
Mir ist dabei aufgefallen das in der Datei layer-water.xml.inc (im
Gegensatz zum englischen Stil)
waterway=river keine Bezeichnung hat aber
Hallo Florian,
Von: Florian Lohoff [mailto:f...@zz.de]
Gesendet am: Freitag, 15. April 2011 10:02
...
Und was 42 1/2 angeht - Ich glaube nicht das das offiziell ist. Da hat
sich jemand einen Scherz geleistet :)
Flo
Nö, bei uns in Augsburg gibt es die offiziell. Das Extrem ist
Hallo zusammen,
hat jemand von Euch einen Tipp wie man Büros oder Gelände von
Bauunternehmern taggt? Dies schließt natuerlich Hoch- und Tiefbau ein.
Gruß
hike39
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Am 15.04.11 10:20, schrieb hike39:
Hallo zusammen,
hat jemand von Euch einen Tipp wie man Büros oder Gelände von
Bauunternehmern taggt? Dies schließt natuerlich Hoch- und Tiefbau ein.
Wenn es dir um den Bauhof geht:
landuse=industrial
industrial=construction_company
Wenn es dir um die
Am Freitag, 15. April 2011, um 09:42:40 schrieb Rainer Knaepper:
Nur zur Verklaring: Mein Rant richtet sich nicht gegen die Schreiber
hier in der Liste, die sich redlich bemühen, Probleme aller Art zu lösen.
Sondern?
Gegen die dick bezahlten Bosse, die sich im Hauptquartier der OSMF den
Am 15. April 2011 06:07 schrieb koppenho koppe...@online.de:
1. Hausnummer mit Buchstabenzusatz: Trage ich immer ohne Leerzeichen
zwischen Nummer und Buchstabe ein.
ich auch
2. Hausnummer mit Zusatz Einhalb: 42 1/2? Das ist vermutlich ok, aber
kommt damit eine Zielort-Suche klar?
m.E.
Nachtrag zum Thema kuriose Hausnummern:
die Null habe ich auch schon gefunden:
http://www.23hq.com/dieterdreist/photo/5258357
und so was hier fand ich auch schön absurd ;-)
http://www.23hq.com/dieterdreist/photo/6281418?
Gruß Martin
___
Talk-de
Am 15.04.2011 10:11, schrieb Sven Geggus:
Wie wäre es wenn Du uns einfach eienn patch machen würdest?
Da muss nur wie im englischen Stil folgende Zeile bei den River
Definitionen rein:
TextSymbolizer name=name fontset_name=book-fonts size=9
fill=#6699cc halo_radius=1 placement=line
Je nachdem, was mit Bauunternehmer gemeint ist, oft bezeichnen sich
Rohbaufirmen so (=Maurer/Betonbauer, ggf. Stahlbauer, Tiefbaufirmen),
und je nach Größe um industrial oder ggf. craft. Bauunternehmer im
rechtlichen Sinn sind alle Firmen, die Bauleistungen anbieten, es
kommt darauf an, welche
Am 14. April 2011 19:44 schrieb Chris66 chris66...@gmx.de:
Am 14.04.2011 18:37, schrieb Manuel Reimer:
Genau dieser Zwitter-Zustand, der jetzt schon ewig andauert, beginnt
zumindest mich so langsam zu nerven.
+1
+1
wieso sollen immer noch weiter die Daten mit vermutlich zukünftig
Am 14. April 2011 20:09 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
ist es vielleicht auch gar nicht so schlecht, wenn man vom
Lizenzwechsel durch einen Mapper aus der eigenen Stadt erfaehrt (und
vorallem auch: in der eigenen Sprache)
Ich hoffe, dass diese Rundmail jeweils in der eigenen
Am 14. April 2011 22:37 schrieb Rainer Knaepper sm...@gmx.de:
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
http://openstreetmap.org/user/terms
Knuffig ist, daß ich einer rechtsverbindlichen Vereinbarung zustimmen soll,
die ich nicht verstehe.
wobei es schon ein paar Dokumente gibt, die versuchen, es Dir auch auf
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
Nachtrag zum Thema kuriose Hausnummern:
die Null habe ich auch schon gefunden:
http://www.23hq.com/dieterdreist/photo/5258357
Entschuldigung, ist das hier Hausnummer LXII?
Nein, dies ist LXIII, aber es ist heruntergefallen ein I
Rainer
Am 15. April 2011 12:25 schrieb yobiSource yobisou...@googlemail.com:
Gibt es den jemanden der am deutschen Stil gearbeitet hat und sagen kann ob
das ein Bug ist oder aus einen bestimmten Grund so gemacht wurde? (gerade in
Bezug auf die Umrandung der Gebäudeflächen)
Ich habe da zwar nicht
2011/4/15 Rainer Knaepper sm...@gmx.de:
Was will Dermot beweisen?
Beweisen nichts, sondern nur verstehen. Es scheinte und scheint mir
noch, dass du bei der ersten OSM Anmeldung auf gleicher Art eine Liste
auf Englisch von verbindlichen Bedingungen zur Teilnahme zugestimmt
hast. Und dann, wie
Am 14. April 2011 21:23 schrieb Johannes Huesing johan...@huesing.name:
Die neuen Hervorhebungen von ITO World sind ziemlich schmuck, aber es wird
wieder etwas als Fehler gebrandmarkt, was hier viele nicht als Fehler
empfinden. Mir ist hier
Genau dort habe ich nachgesehen. Leider ist dieser Tag dort noch nicht
aufgeführt. Aber ich möchte mich dennoch recht herzlich für die schnelle
Antwort bei Dir und Martin bedanken.
hike39
Am 15.04.2011 11:40, schrieb André Joost:
oder hier nachschlagen:
Am 15. April 2011 15:30 schrieb hike39 ho...@hike.de:
oder hier nachschlagen:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:craft
Genau dort habe ich nachgesehen. Leider ist dieser Tag dort noch nicht
aufgeführt.
ja, eine der OSM-Wiki-Seiten, wo zig Details aufgeführt sind und die
wichtigsten
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
Am 15. April 2011 15:30 schrieb hike39 ho...@hike.de:
oder hier nachschlagen:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:craft
Genau dort habe ich nachgesehen. Leider ist dieser Tag dort noch nicht
aufgeführt.
ja, eine der OSM-Wiki-Seiten, wo zig Details
Aufgrund eines parallelen Threads schlage ich vor, den Holzbereich im
Wiki zu überarbeiten.
Grundsätzlich würde ich zwischen strukturellen Arbeiten (tragende
Bauteile wie Wände und Dach) und Innenausbau/Möbelherstellung
unterscheiden. Die Grenzen sind da zugegebenermaßen teilweise etwas
Am 15. April 2011 16:47 schrieb Andre Joost andre+jo...@nurfuerspam.de:
ja, eine der OSM-Wiki-Seiten, wo zig Details aufgeführt sind und die
wichtigsten Dinge (zumindest aus dem Bauhandwerk) allesamt fehlen *
oder z.T. falsch übersetzt sind.
Dann mach doch mal. Du bist doch vom Fach ;-)
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Ich habe da zwar nicht daran mitgearbeitet, aber den Grund kenne ich
vermutlich: der deutsche Stil basiert auf einer älteren Version des
offiziellen Mapnik-stils, wo Umrandungen von Gebäuden noch nicht drin
waren.
Das ist ziemlich sicher der
yobiSource yobisou...@googlemail.com wrote:
Da muss nur wie im englischen Stil folgende Zeile bei den River
Definitionen rein:
TextSymbolizer name=name fontset_name=book-fonts size=9
fill=#6699cc halo_radius=1 placement=line spacing=400 /
Ab zoom 14 mit size=10
Poste das doch mal im
Am 15. April 2011 17:00 schrieb Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
um das abzukürzen: just do it :)
ich danke Dir für das Vertrauen, aber leider ist das gar nicht so
einfach. Carpenter ist wohl doch eher eine generische Bezeichnung, so
was wie Holzverarbeiter, d.h. ein Zimmermann ließe sich
Hallo zusammen,
wie gesagt: die Relation 77040, Europastraße E 54 ist leer, und dass
mit der Version 455.
Laut
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Europe/E-road_network
muss sie mal zu 70% gemapped gewesen sein.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/77040/history
hilft
Am 15. April 2011 19:46 schrieb Toni Erdmann toni.erdm...@web.de:
Hallo zusammen,
wie gesagt: die Relation 77040, Europastraße E 54 ist leer, und dass
mit der Version 455.
Das ist der Link zur Version 454:
http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/77040/454
Gruß Martin
Am 15.04.2011 19:53, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
Am 15. April 2011 19:46 schrieb Toni Erdmanntoni.erdm...@web.de:
Hallo zusammen,
wie gesagt: die Relation 77040, Europastraße E 54 ist leer, und dass
mit der Version 455.
Das ist der Link zur Version 454:
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
