Hello Dwight,
Friday, December 19, 2008, 2:37:48, you wrote:
I just received an HTML message which resulted in centered display in
4.1.1.10.
Please send it to me.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Ritlabs SRL
http://www.ritlabs.com/
Can you please answer one simple question: do you consider
implementing HTML templates in Address Book groups?
And for contacts.
And for mass mailing.
...
Perfect :). Customers demand it :(
--
Vili
Current beta is 4.0.39.27
4/19/2008 9:15 AM
Hi Roger,
On 4/19/2008 Roger Phillips wrote:
RP But TB is supposed to deal with HTML and thus should be considered the *most
RP convenient* tool for the job. As Beta testers we are supposed to tell the
RP Ritlabs developers what is not working!
It seems a little like
Hello Robert,
Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 7:29:37 AM, you wrote:
My screenshot is from 4.0.0.11 too.
If I go to the folder where the message is located I still see the
strange layout.
Is it possible you have disallowed some of the links in the URL
manager?
--
Stuart
Hello Thomas,
TF I'll do. When I redirect HTML messages (when they were sent to the
TF wrong department), the BCC copy to myself shows a blank email with an
TF HTML attachment. That's what triggered my theory.
PVN Not so here. Check your Preferences under Viewer/Editor.
I just set my setting to
Hello Thomas,
This is how it should be done.
--
ViliTitle: Test for Thomas
Hungarian The Bat! page
attachment: fanni.jpg
Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hello Thomas,
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 22:50:27 +0700 GMT (08/03/2007, 22:50 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Nope... The workaround doesn't work, Vili and Vitalie.
And at this point -however painful it is :)) - I have to admit, that
you are right. But I swear that it worked when I wrote
Hello MAU,
This is how it should be done.
Your text part is NOT empty, that's why it works. See my reply to Thomas
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, now I am all confused :)))
So: I KNOW that my method worked. But now I cannot reproduce it to
work :(((
Help me out here. So, how my method will
3/6/2007 8:32 AM
Hi Thomas,
On 3/6/2007 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF I'll do. When I redirect HTML messages (when they were sent to the
TF wrong department), the BCC copy to myself shows a blank email with an
TF HTML attachment. That's what triggered my theory.
Not so here. Check your
Hello Thomas,
If I'm not mistaken, such a message, when received with TB!, will show
a blank body and an HTML attachment, and therefore nothing in the
V Just try it. Too much philosophy about something you did not try :)
I'll do. When I redirect HTML messages (when they were sent to the
wrong
Hello Thomas,
I really dont want to intersect this thread, but I wrote an email with
the subject of How to create an HTML mail with QT (was: Re[2]: amount
of email addresses) on Feb21.
Text of that mail:
Create the an HTML*, save as message.html, attach it to an email with
the pictures and
Hello Vili,
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:58:56 -0500 GMT (05/03/2007, 21:58 +0700 GMT),
Vili wrote:
V I really dont want to intersect this thread, but I wrote an email with
V the subject of How to create an HTML mail with QT (was: Re[2]: amount
V of email addresses) on Feb21.
I saw that. I integrated
Hello Thomas,
If I'm not mistaken, such a message, when received with TB!, will show
a blank body and an HTML attachment, and therefore nothing in the
Just try it. Too much philosophy about something you did not try :)
--
Vili
Hello Alexander,
That does not really exist in most email clients, or its not very
usable. :-) TB puts a fat and ugly blue brickwall on the left.
Outlook Thunderbird use a small blue thin line.
Should not TB! use two horizontal lines before and after the quoted
part? This way, it
3/4/2007 7:37 AM
Hi Mark,
On 3/4/2007 Mark Partous wrote:
PVN History proves 80% of the people are wrong 80% of the time.
MP That's easily said but hardly proven.
Not so. A true historian can substantiate it.
PVN I want to remain with the 20%.
MP Since these 20% are purely fictional, you
3/4/2007 1:43 PM
Hi Alexander,
On 3/4/2007 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK I see that more and more companies switch from using HTML for formatted
ASK letters to a real business letter that comes in a PDF, attached to a
ASK simple plaintext message. The compressed format of PDF with embedded
ASK
3/4/2007 6:37 PM
Hi Thomas,
On 3/4/2007 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
PVN The US Dept. of Defense has banned HTML and Microsoft email clients
PVN and for good reason.
TF I'm not so very sure of this, because they are one of the clients
TF sending me HTMLs mails, the formatting - and even colouring
Hi Everyone,
Saturday, March 3, 2007, 1:24:38 PM, Frank wrote:
Hello Maxim, hello tbbeta,
MM Please test HTML Editor and Windows Editor in The Bat! 3.98.03,
MM especially forwarding messages using these editors and replying
MM quoting selected text. We've done some changes in these
3/4/2007 1:25 AM
Hi Thomas,
TF Here is a wish for v4: Please let us use external editors. This wish
TF came up first, I think, already during v1 times. I do need to reply in
TF HTML to some messages in the office, and the TB! HTML editor produces
TF embarrasing results (starting from that blue
Hello Peter,
V I got an HTML mail with a link in it. Selected the text and the link,
V Ctrl+V in a new mail... Just an empty box appeared. Bug or lack of
V feature?
You forgot to Ctrl+C after selecting.? ;)
No. But I figured it out: from HTML mail, cannot copy to HTML mail.
From HTML mail you
Hello Roelof,
V I got an HTML mail with a link in it. Selected the text and the link,
V Ctrl+V in a new mail... Just an empty box appeared. Bug or lack of
V feature?
Was it a HTML only message?
No.
Can you confirm that behaviour with either the current beta or current
release version?
I
Hello Peter,
A reminder of what Peter Ouwehand typed on:
Tuesday, February 14, 2006 at 00:12:37 GMT +0100
PO The, incomplete, style part you posted doesn't say anything about how
PO to display H1 elements.
No, I guess I should have included more. Here is the next part.
#DAE6F1; } caption {
Hello 9Val,
A reminder of what 9Val typed on:
Wednesday, February 15, 2006 at 11:41:03 GMT +0200
SC Is this just a way to sort of make it work or is this a bug to be
SC fixed?
9 Send the full newsletter with that HTML to me.
Done via PM.
--
Best regards,
Stuart
Hello Paul,
SC Is this just a way to sort of make it work or is this a bug to be
SC fixed?
Lockergnome HTML has been a problem for me for years. I had a
discussion with Chris Pirillo a couple of years ago and his position
was, if it works in OE or other clients that use the IE rendering
Hello 9Val,
A reminder of what 9Val typed on:
Wednesday, February 15, 2006 at 11:41:03 GMT +0200
9 Hi Stuart,
SC Is this just a way to sort of make it work or is this a bug to be
SC fixed?
9 Send the full newsletter with that HTML to me.
No resolution to this in 3.70.10 .
--
Best
Hello 9Val,
A reminder of what 9Val typed on:
Wednesday, February 15, 2006 at 00:28:36 GMT +0200
9 Hello Stuart,
9 Send the full newsletter with that HTML to me.
SC No resolution to this in 3.70.10 .
9 Do you think all problems could be solved in some hours? ;)
I had such faith. :( Then
Hello Alexander,
on 26-Okt-2005 at 14:11 you (Vili) wrote:
I submitted a BT report:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5235
I can confirm that all three of the problems you described happen here as
well.
I saw your supporting note, thanks!
--
Vili
Hello Mark,
On Friday, October 7, 2005, 11:43:06 PM, among other things, you wrote:
ASK While I don't use HTML very much, I think that is a nice idea.
MP Agreed.
Me too. I don't use it much, but when I do I need to paste from an
Excel spreadsheet. I therefore wish they would fix things
Howdy Ben,
Friday, October 7, 2005, 11:41:58 PM, Ben wrotened:
BA Howdy John,
BA Friday, October 7, 2005, 5:59:28 PM, John wrotened:
JT I imagine that most of you do not use HTML mail and so do not realize
JT this, but the HTML portion of TB! does not work well. It is sorta
JT like IMAP, nice
Hello,
With 3.0.9.8 this problem is fixed. Thanks.
Confirmed.
--
Regards,
Francismailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using TB! 3.0.9.8 Return (pre-beta) on Windows XP rev 2600
Current beta is 3.0.9.8 Return | 'Using
sábado, 26 feb 2005 at 18:55, it seems you wrote:
That would be fine with me. Even just a checkbox in the prefs to
enable/disable the button's fuctionality and include/remove it from the
toolbar would be fine with me. In fact, it's a very good idea to make
it inactive completely unless
2/27/2005 6:19 AM
Hi Leif,
On 2/26/2005 Leif Gregory wrote:
LG Happy Tony? Now you drug me into this! :-)
Very well said!
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4
Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA'
2/27/2005 6:29 AM
Hi Mic,
On 2/27/2005 Mic Cullen wrote:
MC If you have even a vague clue as to what you are doing, that statement is
MC utterly false.
My monitor only shows 96 dpi, what is yours?
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4
2/27/2005 8:20 AM
Hi Mary,
On 2/27/2005 Mary Bull wrote:
MB This is so that I can protect myself from inadvertently putting a
MB graphics image into a message-text bodyin the View Folder window.
MB I am just one old-lady user. But I think perhaps there are others with
MB my needs using TB!,
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
A Hi Paul,
A On 27/2/2005 6:21 AM, you wrote:
A At least not for the foreseeable future. Most clients with very
A good HTML mail displaying capabilities either use the IE rendering
A engine or are part of an established browser, i.e., Operamail or
A
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
LG If it's an e-mail function, then go for it. I'd just much rather
LG have RITLabs sink 200 hours into IMAP rather than HTML
LG functionality. IMAP belongs to e-mail, HTML doesn't.
It's part of the new era. RITLabs surely won't straighten up
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
LG Hi Goncalo,
LG On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, at 14:07:07 [GMT +] (which was 7:07 AM where
LG I live) you wrote:
GF I'm sure you manage to get a better justification!
LG Let's expound a bit on this though Goncalo. Why exactly is it that
LG IE is so
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF the misuse of the technology they were providing. Now they made
GF it more secure (not perfectly secure) without cutting down the
GF functionality that people had.
LG Sure they did. MS hosts a page listing hundreds of applications
LG they broke by
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF It's part of the new era. RITLabs surely won't straighten up the
GF usage of email, they must go along with the major players and the
GF major players do have GOOD HTML support.
LG So if your friend jumps off a bridge, you're going to do it too?
No
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF I really don't care about other users, I care about my needs and
GF if I can accomplish them with the software I'm using.
LG Exactly the poor attitude Tony, Paul and I are trying to curtail.
LG The completely selfish, me first attitude. Let the rest
Het was op zondag 27 februari 2005 om 18:19 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'html
whitelist wish' :
Hallo Greg,
Cookidence...
Tagline of the day:
deja moo, the feeling that you've heard this bull before.
GS ROFLMAO!!!
Yeah! I stole that one immediately for my own taglinelist hehehe...
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
DC Goncalo Farias wrote:
It's really easy then. They could provide us users a way to choose
between the HTML internal engine or the IE engine. That way, everyone
would be happy! :)
DC Err, Wouldn't using the IE Engine be a big security hole? Gecko
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB Also the reason I bowed out of the discussion. I want a bug free
TB Bat before they make any new additions, they want html right now
TB and Sod everyone else.
TFC Didnt you say earlier in the threat that this feature has been
TFC requested for around
Het was op zondag 27 februari 2005 om 18:34 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'html
whitelist wish' :
Hallo Greg,
GS Ok now you have me thinking. IIRC didn't you publish a quite lengthy
GS installation for the MyGate plugin or was it MailTraq?
GS If you used both which is better?
as always I'm
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF Isn't it exactly the same attitude you're exhibiting? Did anyone
GF mandate you to define what is allowable or not in email usage?
GF What feature can or cannot be included? What alternatives to
GF current features can be implemented or not?
LG
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF Yeah, right. With less then 2% of market share the last time I
GF saw some statistics their must be very popular.
LG Yeah, Mozilla based browsers are sucking up some serious market
LG share.
Mozilla is not related to Opera, the example given by
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB Hello Goncalo,
TB A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
TB 27 February 2005 at 19:48:59 GMT +0100
GF So, do me a favor, be part of the solution or else...
TB Oh dear, oh dear oh dear. Don't ya just love it when they get violent
TB
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB Hello Goncalo,
TB A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
TB 27 February 2005 at 20:05:59 GMT +0100
GF I said exactly what he said. If he wants to be part of the solution
GF fine, if not, please step aside...
TB You don't know who
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF Sure I do. He is the moderator. Did I said anything offensive? I
GF didn't call lemming to anyone, did I?
TB It's not the moderator part that you need to worry about. Why do
TB you think NO ONE else is arguing with him least of all me?
I'll bet you're
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB You bet wrong. I'm not risking that, that's for sure. Now I think it best
TB we change the subject.
I don't know and it really doesn't matter much, after all we're just
expressing our points of view.
--
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias
73% of
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF I don't know and it really doesn't matter much, after all we're just
GF expressing our points of view.
TB Just so long as it doesn't differ from his too much you should be OK now
TB drop it will you *please*!
ahahahahaha...
--
Best regards,
Goncalo
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB Hello Goncalo,
TB A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
TB 27 February 2005 at 20:53:00 GMT +0100
GF ahahahahaha...
TB You laugh all you want but I have a wife and family whom I love very much
TB and I'm certainly not going to put
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
DC Tony Boom wrote:
Hello Leif,
Also the reason I bowed out of the discussion. I want a bug free Bat
before they make any new additions, they want html right now and Sod
everyone else.
DC I don't think any of us said it had to be 'right now' And as
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
DC I don't think any of us said it had to be 'right now' And as I've
DC said before, I agree that bug fixes should come first.
TB I know, and you are right, html should be available for those that
TB want it. But can you see my point? Those of us that don't
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF Old soldiers never die,
TB They just go on and on and on about the war :)
Hmmm... I better start signing my emails! :)
--
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias
Blessed our young they will inherit our national debt.
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB Hello The,
TB A reminder of what The Final Cut on TBBETA typed on:
TB 27 February 2005 at 21:44:40 GMT +0100
TFC hahahaha I hope you are not serious!
TB Do you see me laughing?
TB Can you see his rouge image? That little boy he's just about to
Het was op zondag 27 februari 2005 om 22:13 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'html
whitelist wish' :
Hallo Tony,
GF ui ui ui estou a tremer cheio de medo!
TB Sorry, don't speak Klingon.
whahahahahaa.. :-))
--
regards,
Cees
Coming soon: Windows for Nintendo!
Hello Tony,
Saturday, February 26, 2005, 5:48:47 AM, you wrote:
Incredibat here we come :
Don't give rit any ideas..Please! :)
--
Best regards,
Tim
Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information:
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB Hello The,
TB A reminder of what The Final Cut on TBBETA typed on:
TB 25 February 2005 at 12:37:15 GMT +0100
TFC You must be kidding to think ppl would have to switch to another
TFC email client if thebat download images from web
TB Must I? Why not
Saturday, February 26, 2005, 5:48:47 AM, you wrote:
A Of course, if someone were to tell you that templates are for the
A lazy, you'd say they didn't know what they were talking about,
A wouldn't you?
OK, I concede defeat, go ahead, Incredibat here we come :)
If I remember correctly, the
Het was op zaterdag 26 februari 2005 om 12:30 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'html whitelist wish' :
Hallo Tony,
TB Hello Tim,
TB A reminder of what Tim Casten on TBBETA typed on:
TB 26 February 2005 at 12:16:42 GMT +0100
TC Don't give rit any ideas..Please!
TB Why not, pretty
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB Hello David,
TB A reminder of what David Calvarese on TBBETA typed on:
TB 25 February 2005 at 19:39:29 GMT +0100
DC Someone on this list called Pocomail a 'child's toy', but it's a
DC child's toy that has basic functionality that TB! is currently
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB Hello David,
TB A reminder of what David Calvarese on TBBETA typed on:
TB 25 February 2005 at 20:39:45 GMT +0100
DC Poco might be missing a lot of the advanced features... But it at least
DC has all the basics
TB So has a pencil and paper.
TB What
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
DC :) And at the moment, I AM using Thunderbird and not TB!.
TB In that case join a thunderbird list and don't come on here saying
TB Thunderbird can do this and Thunderbird can do that. If html is
TB THE ONLY thing The Bat can't do compared to all the
sábado, 26 feb 2005 at 16:39, it seems you wrote:
We are not talking about this. We are talking about the *option* of
whitelisting newsletters individually for download of images. The
option will be turned off by default, and who wants to whitelist any
address does it on his own risk. I
Het was op zaterdag 26 februari 2005 om 16:30 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'html whitelist wish' :
Hallo Thomas,
___\/___
o/\o
TF Please do not protect *me* from myself. I do not take well to
TF nannying. If I cause a problem to my system by downloading images, it
TF will be my own
On 2/26/2005 Mic Cullen wrote:
MC But as an analogy, that's one of the most ridiculous I've seen. Ever.
2/26/2005 10:51 AM
Hi Mic,
Seems right at home with some others that were offered.
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4
On 2/26/2005 David Calvarese wrote:
DC All we want is the option to be able to view it correctly
DC withough having to use a web browser, thus letting us reply to it if we
DC need/want to.
2/26/2005 10:57 AM
Hi David,
I have never been challenged to reply to an HTML message. What is the
On 2/26/2005 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
PVN They can selectively download attachments when circumstances
PVN warrant it on a case by case basis. If the configuration files
PVN are made inaccessible to the user so they are protected from
PVN themselves,
TF Please do not protect *me* from myself. I
Hello Mary,
Saturday, February 26, 2005, 11:52:12 AM, you wrote:
Hello David!
On Saturday, February 26, 2005, 10:33 AM, you wrote:
The perfect option will be a button or something to load the images of
the current mail. And this should be made manually every time.
--snipped--
Het was op zaterdag 26 februari 2005 om 21:03 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'html whitelist wish' :
Hallo Tony,
GF Is it too much to have an option to enable full HTML support?
TB I'm going to make one last comment on this subject. For years most people
TB on this list have in the past
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB Hello Goncalo,
TB A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
TB 26 February 2005 at 15:11:53 GMT +0100
GF Is it too much to have an option to enable full HTML support?
TB I'm going to make one last comment on this subject. For years most
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB Hello Goncalo,
TB A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
TB 26 February 2005 at 15:17:47 GMT +0100
GF They want an enhanced version with what other clients have best,
GF you seem to want a client tailored to your personal needs
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB Hello Goncalo,
TB A reminder of what Goncalo Farias on TBBETA typed on:
TB 26 February 2005 at 15:20:50 GMT +0100
GF Users like you are of big prejudice for business, scaring customers
GF away!
TB Boo!
AAA... :)
--
Best regards,
Hello Tony!
On Saturday, February 26, 2005, 2:03 PM, you wrote:
Tony Hello Goncalo,
Tony The Bat html free... Where are they all now? They've all jumped
ship and
Tony are now sitting firmly on the fence and it appears, I am the
only one who
Tony is keeping true to my original convictions.
I
Hello Tony,
Saturday, February 26, 2005, 10:12:08 PM, among other things, you wrote:
TB Er no, I want The Bat as it is with all the bugs ironed out before any
TB completely new untested extras are added.
TB We've had this discussion in the past a dozen times, why add new things
TB that will
On 2/25/2005 Tony Boom wrote:
TFC wow that's sad to see thebat users to closed mind
TB Nothing to do with closed minds. Most people on here chose TB!
TB specifically because of it's inability to handle html. You go changing
TB that and everyone will have to find another client.
2/25/2005
On 2/25/2005 The Final Cut wrote:
TFC You must be kidding to think ppl would have to switch to
TFC another email client if thebat download images from web.
TFC As mentionned _many_ times, that would work with a
TFC whitelist and the most important, the option would be disabled by
TFC default.
On 2/25/2005 The Final Cut wrote:
TFC 3. peers? show me some and your sources
2/25/2005 7:34 AM
Hi The,
Eudora, OE, Outlook, etc.
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4
Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using
On 2/25/2005 Dave Gorman wrote:
DG unusability of any of these. Outhouse and Outhouse Express especially
DG are in a class of their own when it comes to bloat and security flaws.
True, the outs are in a class by themselves. However, Thunderbird
emulates more of the look feel of the outs than I
On 2/25/2005 Mark Partous wrote:
MP Content : one company logo and a table of values, 2 pages in total.
MP Size: 912 kb.
MP After reformating by me : 54 kb. with a minimal loss of quality (if one
looks
MP carefully, it can be seen in the logo).
2/25/2005 9:14 AM
Hi Mark,
HTML messages
On 2/25/2005 Mark Partous wrote:
MP You silly boy, the group of long-time users said, you don't know what you
MP are talking about.
MP And at the end of another day of nice driving in their beloved old car, all
MP went to sleep in their bed.
MP Not without opening the doors of their car of
On 2/25/2005 Richard Wakeford wrote:
RW someone. Alright, there are many people out there who don't know how to
RW do that but I want my pictures in my camera to be of the highest quality
RW possible thank you :-)
2/25/2005 11:00 AM
Hi Richard,
A 1600x1200 picture reduced to 320x240 for
On 2/25/2005 Dave Gorman wrote:
DG Granted, there are many end users who will not know the ramifications of
DG their choices. Buy why should my computing experience be diminished or
DG made more inconvenient for no reason other than to prevent the stupid
DG users from screwing things up?
On 2/25/2005 Dennis Hays wrote:
DH What we all have in common, on this list, are the reasons we
DH originally came to TB! And, from a marketing point of view,
DH these have to be respected. I don't think most of us looked at
DH this product because of its fine HTML viewer.
2/25/2005 2:27 PM
On 2/25/2005 David Calvarese wrote:
DC Someone on this list called Pocomail a 'child's toy', but it's a child's
DC toy that has basic functionality that TB! is currently lacking. Both
DC the HTML/Image issue as well as (IIRC) proper IMAP support.
2/25/2005 2:25 PM
Hi David,
Conversely, POCO
On 2/25/2005 David Calvarese wrote:
DC We just want the option to be able to click
DC a button and have it display them if we want it too. And possibly being
DC able to tag an address in the address book to 'Display Remote Images' or
DC even 'Trust HTML email from people in your address book',
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB Hello The,
TB A reminder of what The Final Cut on TBBETA typed on:
TB 24 February 2005 at 22:38:25 GMT +0100
TFC wow that's sad to see thebat users to closed mind
TB Nothing to do with closed minds. Most people on here chose TB!
TB specifically
On 2/25/2005 AC Martin wrote:
AM BTW, if the neophyte is curious about TB! not loading images, they'll
AM ask us and we'd be the first to tell them to *simply* open the message
AM in their browser, leaving them at risk, even if we warn them. :)
2/25/2005 8:12 PM
Hi AC,
Speak for yourself.
On 2/25/2005 Allie wrote:
A Furthermore, if
A TB! loaded the images, what would make it compromise the machine more
A than if Opera were to load those same images?
2/25/2005 9:09 PM
Hi Allie,
If you must click on an icon and wait for a browser to load there is
opportunity to think about your
Het was op donderdag 24 februari 2005 om 22:18 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'html whitelist wish' :
Hallo Peter,
PM PLEASE, not again. We have had this for so many times over and over.
TFC I really hope this will be implemented in thebat so we can
TFC see mailing list in html format.
PM I
Hello Hendrik,
Friday, January 21, 2005, 12:52:22 PM, hai scritto:
HO Could you please send such email to the list (including the complete
HO source code)? I think that the error is in wrong HTML code rather than
HO an error from TB!
I will as soon as I will receive a new message with the
HO Goncalo Farias wrotes on 21/01/2005 at 19:26:14 +1100
HO subject Html viewer and accented letters :
I confirm this. Somehow TB! isn't caring much to the ISO-8859-1
standard. It doesn't happen all the time thought and changing to plain
text (windows) corrects it.
HO Could you
Hello!
No. I have the preview window on - as soon as I click on the message
001.msg the request is sent.
The same (
Klimov Vova [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.starsoft.org Sisoftware Russian localisation
team
Ritlabs Russian localisation
Crafted from The Desk on location in the Quality Lab.
Hello Kevin,
Sunday, August 8, 2004, 12:21:00 AM, you wrote:
KA This error has been around for a long time (at least since early
KA in the 2.12 beta cycle) for whatever it is worth.
Maybe my luck just ran out, because before the 2.13 series
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:48:53 +0700 UTC (7/28/2004, 11:48 AM -0500 UTC my
time), Thomas Fernandez in part wrote:
T I am not experiencing this under Win98 or XP Pro. Are you guys using
T IMAP or POP accounts?
G I know Allie is using XP with IMAP, don't know about Kevin, and I am using
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, March 28, 2004, 3:26:41 PM, you wrote:
TF Drifthat, what's your OS?
win2k adv server + sp4, TB v2.05 beta/12
--
Best regards,
drifthatmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Translator of Chinese The Bat!
Hello Allie,
[On 2/15/2003 at 4:16 PM, you said:]-
I think you misunderstood me.
I write a message to you in HTML. I define no fonts and defined one
font size, i.e., +1 and emboldened it to stress a phrase.
When I read the message, the font size will
Hello James,
[On 2/15/2003 at 6:23 PM, you said:]-
I'd think it would be very practical to all recipients of html
messages. As for implementation, I'd like to see a button on the
viewer that could override any html message to one's default
settings. Dennis Hayes employs the
Hello Martin,
18.03.02, you wrote:
MSFONT color=crimson
AL W3C also know nothing about _this_ color
MS Found a link with color descriptions:
MS http://st-ives.net/dlv/html/colorsamples.html
Thank.
Best regards,
Dimanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
