Hi Roger,
> The times shown on your message are the same in both versions, but perhaps
> once the message haas been received there is no problem. It may only occur
> during the initial download, depending on which version does the download.
Yes, maybe.
In any case: Thanks for trying that ou
Hello Alto,
Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 11:22:59 AM, among other things, you wrote:
AS> Hi Roger,
>> I have version 4 in one folder and version 5 in another folder. Both access
>> the same TB files. I can thus switch from one version to the other at any
>> time and have the
Hello Alto,
Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 11:22:59 AM, among other things, you wrote:
AS> Hi Roger,
>> I have version 4 in one folder and version 5 in another folder. Both access
>> the same TB files. I can thus switch from one version to the other at any
>> time and have the
Hello Alto,
Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 11:22:59 AM, among other things, you wrote:
AS> Hi Roger,
>> I have version 4 in one folder and version 5 in another folder. Both access
>> the same TB files. I can thus switch from one version to the other at any
>> time and have the
Title: Re[2]: Version 4
Hi Alto,
Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 3:43:17 AM, Tbbeta wrote:
> Hi Rick,
>> I too still have the exe for version 4 in my prog folder and can
>> rename it back if I feel the need.
> Are you sure? Wasn't there some issue with the mailbase if you
>
Hi Roger,
> I have version 4 in one folder and version 5 in another folder. Both access
> the same TB files. I can thus switch from one version to the other at any
> time and have the smae folder list and messages.
As I recall, there was an issue with v4 not using local timezon
Hello Alto,
Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 9:43:17 AM, among other things, you wrote:
AS> Hi Rick,
>> I too still have the exe for version 4 in my prog folder and can
>> rename it back if I feel the need.
AS> Are you sure? Wasn't there some issue with the mailbase if you
AS>
Hi Rick,
> I too still have the exe for version 4 in my prog folder and can
> rename it back if I feel the need.
Are you sure? Wasn't there some issue with the mailbase if you
switched back over major versions? Or does this only affect POP users?
--
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Alto
On Monday, June 6, 2011, 18:18:19, Rick wrote:
> Why would ANYONE on the Beta Test list be considering moving back to v4 ?
Maybe due to endless
---
thebat.exe - No Disk
---
There is no disk in the drive. Please insert a disk into drive
\Device\Har
Hi All,
Thank you all for your comments and hints.
The reason why I want to move back to 4.22 is that for last month I
spent part of my work time dealing with issues while I should be
working. It causes delays while replying, lost some e-mails after
importing and I can't affor
Hi Joe,
> So, I am back to 4 for production, still using 5 for beta testing
> and waiting patiently to see my bugs fixed, however, if past history
> ( read the threads about all the IMAP issues) is any indication,
> maybe we will have to wait for v6 after we pay for the upgrade to
> get
Hi Roelof,
R>> It was the reason why I set up daily autobackup - but it stopped
R>> working here
R>> Would like to have it even more frequent, ex: every 12 hours.
> In that case. Create a schedule by yourself in TB's scheduler and set
> that to create backups with your own specified
On Monday, June 6, 2011, 12:04:34 PM, Paul Van Noord wrote:
R>> Why would ANYONE on the Beta Test list be considering moving back to v4 ?
> Because we have important daily business to conduct that requires
> an email client without performance/stability issues.
I've had both of those qualit
Hello Rick,
Monday, June 6, 2011, 10:52:31 PM, you wrote:
R> Sorry, I am not interested in this thread any more
:-) I agree with your point of view and don't like the bashing either.
Personally I currently don't have the time to test on a separate PC, so, until
I have more time, I'm only l
> Hi Rick,
>> Why would ANYONE on the Beta Test list be considering moving back to v4 ?
> The question is: Who else would? A beta is a program that someone does
> find acceptable for release but wants to get more information from the
> installed base if it really is. So normally it comes with a w
> 6/6/2011 3:36 PM
> Hi Rick,
> On 6/6/2011 Rick wrote:
R>> They redid the entire program. It has bugs in it. Agreed. Isn't
R>> this a list for identifying and testing version 5?
> Sure when it was identified as a beta. The premature release changed
> the rules. My customers trust me to provid
6/6/2011 3:36 PM
Hi Rick,
On 6/6/2011 Rick wrote:
R> They redid the entire program. It has bugs in it. Agreed. Isn't
R> this a list for identifying and testing version 5?
Sure when it was identified as a beta. The premature release changed
the rules. My customers trust me to provide them with
> Hello Rick,
> Monday, June 6, 2011, 12:18:19 PM, you wrote:
>> Why would ANYONE on the Beta Test list be considering moving back to v4 ?
> Because they installed the official release of V5 a few months back
> assuming that it went through a full beta and would work fine with
> maybe a few mino
Hallo RS,
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 01:46:28 +0800GMT (6-6-2011, 19:46 , where I
live), you wrote:
R> It was the reason why I set up daily autobackup - but it stopped
R> working here
R> Would like to have it even more frequent, ex: every 12 hours.
In that case. Create a schedule by yourself
R>> OK - some are maintaining v4 for reliability reasons. But isn't
R>> this a list for identifying and testing version 5?
> It is a statement that v5 is still a beta and not ready for prime
> time. I have been a TB user from v1.1 back in 1998. I do not remember
> any previous version to v5 that
Hello Rick,
Monday, June 6, 2011, 12:18:19 PM, you wrote:
> Why would ANYONE on the Beta Test list be considering moving back to v4 ?
Because they installed the official release of V5 a few months back assuming
that it went through a full beta and would work fine with maybe a few minor
bugs.
6/6/2011 2:37 PM
Hi Rick,
On 6/6/2011 Rick wrote:
R> OK - some are maintaining v4 for reliability reasons. But isn't
R> this a list for identifying and testing version 5? I too still have
R> the exe for version 4 in my prog folder and can rename it back if I feel the
need.
It
> If I just want to join TBBETA I wouldn't spend money on licence
> but download a client and test it constantly. As 5.0.12 is official
> release that is provided to clients it should work not give me on
> daily basis exceptions and access violations ; not mentioning that
> autob
re maintaining v4 for reliability reasons. But isn't this a list
for identifying and testing version 5? I too still have the exe for version 4
in my prog folder and can rename it back if I feel the need.
--
Rick
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War
Hi Thomas,
> As with all version changes (especially on a beta list) make full
> back-ups.
It was the reason why I set up daily autobackup - but it stopped
working here
Would like to have it even more frequent, ex: every 12 hours.
--
Best Regards,
RS (FEDARA)
The Bat! 4.2.44.2
Wind
Hi Rick,
>> Hi All,
Is it possible to export v5 (current one I spent lots of time on
setting filters and sorting e-mails) to TB! v4.22?
>> If anyone is thinking about moving back to 4.22 database (TBK) import
>> can be done directly from backup file. Just export all of the stuff
6/6/2011 1:01 PM
Hi Rick,
On 6/6/2011 Rick wrote:
R> Why would ANYONE on the Beta Test list be considering moving back to v4 ?
Because we have important daily business to conduct that requires
an email client without performance/stability issues.
- --
Paul
The Bat! v.4.2.44.2 on Windows 7 Pr
Hello Rick,
Monday, June 6, 2011, 6:18:19 PM, you wrote:
R> Why would ANYONE on the Beta Test list be considering moving back to v4 ?
Because v5 is not reliable enough yet?
Even though I have 4 accounts that make use of IMAP, I could as well do without
it.
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
Hello Rick,
Monday, June 6, 2011, 6:18:19 PM, among other things, you wrote:
>> Hi All,
Is it possible to export v5 (current one I spent lots of time on
setting filters and sorting e-mails) to TB! v4.22?
>> If anyone is thinking about moving back to 4.22 database (TBK) import
>
> Hi All,
>>> Is it possible to export v5 (current one I spent lots of time on
>>> setting filters and sorting e-mails) to TB! v4.22?
> If anyone is thinking about moving back to 4.22 database (TBK) import
> can be done directly from backup file. Just export all of the stuff to
> TBK, unin
Hello RS,
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 13:23:04 +0800 GMT (06/Jun/11, 12:23 PM +0700 GMT),
RS (FEDARA) wrote:
RF> Thank you for a prompt reply.
Most welcome.
RF>>> Is version 4.22 working properly as it should?
RF> I did try 3.99 version for a month and I was using it daily with lots
RF> of e-mails a
Hello RS,
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:31:00 +0800 GMT (06/Jun/11, 15:31 PM +0700 GMT),
RS (FEDARA) wrote:
RF> The only strange think was that all VF were empty up to the moment
RF> when each of them was selected and ESC was pressed. After that
RF> messages appeared.
Not a big deal, it's a
Hi All,
>> Is it possible to export v5 (current one I spent lots of time on
>> setting filters and sorting e-mails) to TB! v4.22?
If anyone is thinking about moving back to 4.22 database (TBK) import
can be done directly from backup file. Just export all of the stuff to
TBK, uninstall v5,
Hi Brian,
>> Is it possible to export v5 (current one I spent lots of time on
>> setting filters and sorting e-mails) to TB! v4.22?
> I just reverted to v4. To be safe I backed up before reinstalling but
> there was no need. I did find that v4 will not overwrite the v5
> thebat.exe
Hi Thomas,
Thank you for a prompt reply.
RF>> Is version 4.22 working properly as it should?
> IMHO, TB!v4 is the best POP client in the world. No Access Violations, no
> memory leaks that I am aware of, filters work flawlessly and Virtual
> Folders get updated automatically. Message counts are
Hello RS,
Sunday, June 5, 2011, 9:05:35 AM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> Is version 4.22 working properly as it should?
> Is it possible to import v4 database/filters and all the stuff to v5
> after it's fixed?
> Is it possible to export v5 (current one I spent lots of time on
> setting filters a
Hello RS,
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 21:05:35 +0800 GMT (05/Jun/11, 20:05 PM +0700 GMT),
RS (FEDARA) wrote:
RF> Is version 4.22 working properly as it should?
IMHO, TB!v4 is the best POP client in the world. No Access Violations, no
memory leaks that I am aware of, filters work flawlessly and Virtual
Fo
Hi,
Is version 4.22 working properly as it should?
Is it possible to import v4 database/filters and all the stuff to v5
after it's fixed?
Is it possible to export v5 (current one I spent lots of time on
setting filters and sorting e-mails) to TB! v4.22?
And question to developers:
Can
The 'unread' tab is not going to be very helpful to IMAP users until
TB! learns to count. I had a folder which showed one unread message,
but no unread tab until after I shifted focus to that folder. I also
had unread messages in another folder which was not highlignted,
didn't show unread messages
Hello Ethan,
> Is version 4.0 testing anticipated prior to year end or sometime first
> quarter next year?
By Xmas.
--
Vili
The Bat 3.99.6 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 2
Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
ht
Is version 4.0 testing anticipated prior to year end or sometime first quarter
next year?
Thanks
--
Ethan J. Mings CBM, CTF, CMQ/OE,CQA
Principal, The Desk
Oakville, Ontario, Canada.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.thedesk.ca
Phone: 905-825-9938 or 1-877-763-7776
I've had a long list of ignored suggestions. My primary beef is areound adress
handling, particularly of address book groups and distributions lists. These
woul dbe nice to have fixed / included
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3758
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2995
https://www.ri
42 matches
Mail list logo
