Hello,
Monday, January 17, 2000, 11:43:39 PM, you wrote:
> From
> From
> From
>From
> From
> From
Of course now I can not reproduce the bug if I try.
>From shouldn't be anything special, should it?
--
Thanks for writing
Januk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.39 Beta/1
u
Hello,
Monday, January 17, 2000, 11:31:01 PM, you wrote:
>>From originalwith whatever
Ok, this is weird, when I was composing the above message, I know I
did not put the > symbol in front of the word From. But when I sent
it and it came back through the list, F
Hello Thomas,
Monday, January 17, 2000, 10:04:57 PM, you wrote:
> Hi Januk,
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 21:36:43 -0800GMT (18/01/2000, 13:36 +0800GMT),
> Januk Aggarwal wrote:
> Thanks for your tip; I created a QT like this:
> %FROM=" (by way of %FromAddr)"
> The from addr will then show the orig
Hi Oleg,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:06:20 +0400GMT (18/01/2000, 15:06 +0800GMT),
Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
OZ> That is not a problem with external editor which allow scripting. The
OZ> problems begin only when you use macros which use information
OZ> unavailable to external editor, just bec
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Monday, January 17, 2000, Allie Martin wrote to Oleg Zalyalov about
suggestion- / wish-list:
AM> That's a valid concern. Using quick templates during message
AM> composition would definitely be a problem when using an external editor
AM> especially when using
Hello Steve,
Monday, January 17, 2000, 4:43:18 AM, you wrote:
> Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We've gone over this, Allie. At first glance that is going to the right
> place because of TB!'s broken behavior, configurable or not.
Ok, but why would you *intentionally* put the wrong r
Hello Jast,
Monday, January 17, 2000, 2:35:33 AM, you wrote:
> Morning tracer,
> The alternative would be an applet/utility that let's you select the
> folders etc. and just set common options which get written to these
> folders' options.
I think you've got the winner there. :) The whole beau
Hi Januk,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 21:36:43 -0800GMT (18/01/2000, 13:36 +0800GMT),
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
JA> Or, it would probably be better to put
JA> %FROM="(By Way of Jane ""[EMAIL PROTECTED]"")"
Thanks for your tip; I created a QT like this:
%FROM=" (by way of %FromAddr)"
The from addr will th
Hello Thomas,
Monday, January 17, 2000, 2:19:46 AM, you wrote:
> Hi Januk,
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 01:31:15 -0800GMT (17/01/2000, 17:31 +0800GMT),
> Januk Aggarwal wrote:
JA>> Well, you sort of can, if you are redirecting one message at a time,
JA>> TB allows you to edit the message, so you c
Morning Steve Lamb,
> Mouse & text editing. You have tentacles, do you?
Actually, no. However I have two hands, each with 5 fingers. 5+5=10. An
octopus has only 8 tentacles, a squid has 10 more or less independently
movable ones. But these might stick to the keyboard, so
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 18:06:40 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 9:06:40 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve> On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 01:05:19AM +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
>> Might I humbly suggest you use TB as an e-mai
In Reference to "Just an interesting problem:-) and a pair of wishlist items." From
Steve Lamb:
SL>
SL> You have 6 choices on how you want the quotes to be shown...
SL> ...5 of which are wrong...
SL>
A.K.A. Stay between the lines. The lines are our friend.
SL> Kidding! ;)
Ditt
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:50:56 -0800GMT (18/01/2000, 09:50 +0800GMT),
Tom Plunket wrote:
MDP>> (it's only one additional keystroke after all.
TP> Umm, it's 50% more typing.
Wow, you time must be extremely valuable. ;-)
AVK Please, don't do this! Maybe as an option only;-) It's the t
Monday, January 17, 2000, 7:34:11 PM, Thomas wrote:
> I also like them; but you can get rid of them by going into
> Account/Properties/Templates/Reply. You have six choices of how you
> want the quotes to be shown.
You have 6 choices on how you want the quotes to be shown...
...5 of whi
Hi Clemens,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 23:04:30 +0100GMT (18/01/2000, 06:04 +0800GMT),
Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer wrote:
CGS> well, then the best way is to do purge or compress all folder from the
CGS> menu, right ???
CGS> but I don't think, the bat can show me this % thing ...
I do it on a regu
Hi Michael,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:03:01 +0100GMT (18/01/2000, 05:03 +0800GMT),
Michael Heydekamp wrote:
AVK>> Assume you want to get rid of those funny
"XYZ>>>" quotation marks (I really dislike these:-)).
MH> That you should not get rid of those "funny" quote initials. :-)
I also like them;
Hi G.,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 18:10:32 -0500GMT (18/01/2000, 07:10 +0800GMT),
G. Cowling, SRNA wrote:
GCS> Is there any way to set up a filter which can redirect a message to an
GCS> address contained in the text of the original message?
This should be possible with Regular Expressions, if I am no
Hi Clemens,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:43:08 +0100GMT (18/01/2000, 05:43 +0800GMT),
Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer wrote:
CGS> Is it possible, that I can get a log of my filter activity? So I
CGS> know which files are moved to which folder.
My wish exactly. :-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Message
On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 01:05:19AM +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> Might I humbly suggest you use TB as an e-mail
> client a while longer. The editor is one thing that suddenly leaps out as
> being very well suited to the job it does for the /type of
> information/ it works on
AVK>>> Press instead;-)
MDP> (it's only one additional keystroke after all.
Umm, it's 50% more typing. See, the problem doesn't manifest itself
'til you're actually trying to use the software in a real fashion, and
you don't want to fight with the interface.
AVK>>> Please, don't do this! Mayb
Hi G.,
On 17 January 2000 at 18:09:15 GMT -0500 (which was 23:09 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
>>> Since we're talking about the editor, is there a way to turn of
>>> "virtual space" so the cursor won't go places where there are none
>>> of spaces, characters,
Hello Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 23:02:32 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, January 18, 2000, 5:02:32 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer wrote:
Clemens> Hello tracer,
Clemens> Sunday, January 16, 2000, 3:01:26 AM, tracer wrote:
Cle
Is there any way to set up a filter which can redirect a message to an
address contained in the text of the original message?
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team
Monday, January 17, 2000, 4:36:07 PM, Alexander wrote:
AVK> Hi there!
AVK> On 17 Jan 00, at 12:36, Tom Plunket wrote
AVK> about "Re[3]: suggestion- / wish-list":
>> Since we're talking about the editor, is there a way to turn of
>> "virtual space" so the cursor won't go places where ther
Hello rellieb-jean,
Monday, January 17, 2000, 2:56:36 AM, you wrote:
> I am trialling Bat! The quoted text looks bold. Is there any way I
> can turn that bold off. It is too 'in-your-face' and draws attention
> away from the actual reply.
Options, Editor preferences, Display tab
--
Best re
I am trialling Bat! The quoted text looks bold. Is there any way I
can turn that bold off. It is too 'in-your-face' and draws attention
away from the actual reply.
--
Best regards,
rellieb-jean mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Hello tracer,
Sunday, January 16, 2000, 2:56:29 PM, tracer wrote:
>>> Exactly that. They stay there, marked as deleted and are never seen
>>> again. The solution is to activate the "Compress folder on exit"
>>> setting of the Folder options.
Clemens>> Actually I would have to activate
Hello tracer,
Sunday, January 16, 2000, 3:01:26 AM, tracer wrote:
Clemens>> so this means, unless I activate the compress thing in the inbox
Clemens>> folder, all mails stay there and are not moved to the other folders?
Clemens>> or do they stay there, and are also copied into the other folders
Hello The Bat! ML,
Is it possible, that I can get a log of my filter activity? So I
know which files are moved to which folder. I just had a wrong
filter and so I thought I missed some mails ...
Best regards, Clemens
written with TheBat! 1.38e
on Windows 98, 4 10
Build A
on Monday,
Hi there!
On 17 Jan 00, at 12:36, Tom Plunket wrote
about "Re[3]: suggestion- / wish-list":
> Since we're talking about the editor, is there a way to turn of
> "virtual space" so the cursor won't go places where there are none of
> spaces, characters, created lines? I like to be at the en
Hi there!
On 17 Jan 00, at 21:36, Oliver Sturm wrote
about "Re[2]: Newbie now on list...":
> > Yep. But that's another side of this coin. TB treats MIME digests *right now*
> > awfully: it treats them as an empty message with heaps of attachments, each
> > of them being a message. Nightmar
Hello,
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Using the best The Bat! 1.39 reg
under the worst Windows 95 4.0 Build B
Intel Celeron 266 MHz, 32 MB
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to
Monday, January 17, 2000, 3:36:04 PM, Tom wrote:
TP> Since we're talking about the editor, is there a way to turn of
TP> "virtual space" so the cursor won't go places where there are none of
TP> spaces, characters, created lines? I like to be at the end of a
TP> paragraph and hit to go to th
Dear Alexander,
on Sunday, December 12, 1999, 00:28, you wrote:
AVK> Assume you want to get rid of those funny
"XYZ>>" quotation marks (I really dislike these:-)).
[snip]
AVK> Okay, this message proved to be rather long one, but anyhow,
AVK> what do you think?
That you should not get rid of
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello mharlos,
m> Things seem to work OK...is that approach acceptable?
it certainly is, i use the same all the time :-)
never had any problems with
Hi Andrew,
Friday, January 14, 2000, 4:12:03 PM, you wrote:
> Hello, mharlos!
m>> [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\.doc]
m>> @="Word.Document.8"
> This means all the commands about .DOC files are described in
> section Word.Document.8
...[lots of very detailed and helpful info snipped]...
Thanks very mu
Hi Alexander V. Kiselev,
On Montag, 17. Januar 2000 at 21:10:27 you wrote:
> Yep. But that's another side of this coin. TB treats MIME digests *right now*
> awfully: it treats them as an empty message with heaps of attachments, each
> of them being a message. Nightmare to read this thing! Unl
Since we're talking about the editor, is there a way to turn of
"virtual space" so the cursor won't go places where there are none of
spaces, characters, created lines? I like to be at the end of a
paragraph and hit to go to the beginning of the next,
but as you all may know, it doesn't work th
Hi there!
On 16 Jan 00, at 23:31, Oliver Sturm wrote
about "Re[2]: Newbie now on list...":
> > [ splitting digests ]
>
> > Believe it or not, but this is *my own favourite*, too;-(
>
> I'm not saying I don't like the idea, but one arrogant question: Why
> do you subscribe in digest m
Hi there!
On 16 Jan 00, at 23:30, Januk Aggarwal wrote
about "Re: Block selection types...":
> Hello Tom,
>
> Sunday, January 16, 2000, 11:20:27 PM, you wrote:
>
> > Heh, oops. What I'm talking about is what you get when you
> > right-click in a composition window, and hit "Block Type".
Hi there!
On 17 Jan 00, at 0:44, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: suggestion- / wish-list":
> > Just out of curiosity, I had a look around and cannot seem to find an
> > editor that will work as well as TB!'s with respect to formatting and
> > reflowing *quoted* text. Boxer 99 comes very clos
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Mark,
MA> Could you tell me what macros you used? I tried the obvious
MA> override FROM but it just added the folder identity and still left
MA>
Hallo Steve,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:55:01 -0800 GMT (18.01.2000, 00:55 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
SL> Mouse & text editing. You have tentacles, do you?
ROTFLOL!
--
Cheers,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.39 Beta/1
und
Hallo Steve,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:53:08 -0800 GMT (18.01.2000, 00:53 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
SL> The problem here is that if something is a boolean in nature why
SL> have %SINGLERE when you can have a checkbox near "Reply Counting". I am a
SL> programmer and I really don't like clutteri
Hallo Steve,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:50:02 -0800 GMT (18.01.2000, 00:50 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
SL> Uhm, no. *YOU* should reply to the destination that is fitting the
SL> content of the message at hand. The *client* should default that to be the
SL> reply-to. There is a *BIG* differe
Hi Jast,
Monday, January 17, 2000, 4:23:21 PM, you wrote:
J> Morning Mark Aston,
>> I have a sub folder of my main account with it's own Reply-to and From
>> settings, if I create a new message while this folder is selected the
>> correct Reply To and From are shown. If however I create a messa
Hi Roel,
Monday, January 17, 2000, 4:23:14 PM, you wrote:
R> just a tip: don't trust dreamweaver for cross-browser scripting...
R> it often uses way more code than necesarry or it just doesn't work...
R> also: the image-rollovers & preloading scripts aren't that good...
R> (especially v2 messes
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Steve,
SL> *arched brow* Dreamweaver or FP2k. Hmmm, I think the choice is
SL> clear that considering Dreamweaver doesn't mangle code you put in
Monday, January 17, 2000, 8:23:14 AM, Roel wrote:
> just a tip: don't trust dreamweaver for cross-browser scripting...
> it often uses way more code than necesarry or it just doesn't work...
*arched brow* Dreamweaver or FP2k. Hmmm, I think the choice is clear
that considering Dreamweaver do
Monday, January 17, 2000, 6:52:51 AM, Oleg wrote:
> Really? They at least share the code for displaying message and cursor
> movement and search. Only editing itself disabled while viewing message.
Right. Considering the viewer is the lesser of the two objects, which do
you think is based on
Monday, January 17, 2000, 2:14:25 AM, Jast wrote:
> Luckily TB editor will allow you to add selection on both ends of a
> selection block (with Shift+mouseclick where you want it) so you won't have
> to go the full procedure when you forgot a line...
Mouse & text editing. You have tentacles,
Monday, January 17, 2000, 1:04:50 AM, Jast wrote:
> This way you can easily see what *does* happen.
Assuming your entire template fits in the edit box, which they rarely, if
ever do. The problem here is that if something is a boolean in nature why
have %SINGLERE when you can have a checkbox
Monday, January 17, 2000, 1:04:22 AM, Thomas wrote:
> But this is exactly the point: I should reply to the list, that's why
> the list server replaces you original reply-to with the list address.
Uhm, no. *YOU* should reply to the destination that is fitting the
content of the message at han
Morning Mark Aston,
> I have a sub folder of my main account with it's own Reply-to and From
> settings, if I create a new message while this folder is selected the
> correct Reply To and From are shown. If however I create a message by
> selecting a favourite from the drop down list then the par
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Mark,
MA> Absolutely, a complete copy of the site you just worked on,
MA> additionally it will fill your server space with unwanted
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 18:52:51 +0400, Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
[..snip..]
> I don't want to have it in message template, because I will forget to
> delete it always -- and I don't want to delete some text from every
> message to be able to have it in about 2 or 3 messages a week.
> So it is Qu
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Monday, January 17, 2000, Steve Lamb wrote to Oleg Zalyalov about
suggestion- / wish-list:
>> At least I have need in preview when killing mail. The preview in TB! is
>> based on the editor. Or should there be external message viewer also?
SL> It isn't based
Hello The Bat! developers,
I'm using The Bat! Version 1.39 Beta/1 Serial Number 44DB0E98
under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
and would like to report a bug
The bug description:
I have a sub folder of my main account with it's own Reply-to and From
settings, if I create a new message w
Hi tracer,
Sunday, January 16, 2000, 2:36:18 AM, you wrote:
Mark>> LookOut leaves
Mark>> loads of stuff in temp, including every attachment that
Mark>> is opened,
Mark>> even those which were encrypted, so TB! is not so bad after all:-)
t> Bad?
t> Look what frontpage leaves behind
Abso
On Monday, January 17, 2000, 12:19:50 AM, tracer wrote:
> I suppose its not in the help file?? (g)
Well I'll be darned!! Thanks Tracer. I went to the Help file and typed
in "Block"... and there it was. I feel pretty stupid for not doing that
in the first place. I was always typing in "Persistent
On Sunday, January 16, 2000, 11:41:04 PM, Allie Martin wrote:
>>- Overwrite blocks
> This is the switch that when enabled, allows you to delete a selected
> block of text by simply starting to type within it.
Ahhh _That's_ the one I've been looking for! :o) This is what I'm
used to
Monday, January 17, 2000, 1:04:03 AM, Allie wrote:
> Move your eyes up to the To: field and verify the address before
> sending (that's if either address mean anything to you in the first
> place). Problem solved. :
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We've gone over this, Allie. At
Hello Allie & all fellow TBUDL members,
Monday, January 17, 2000, 3:06:36 AM, Allie wrote in response to
Thomas Fernandez:
AM> On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 16:28:27 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
AM> [..snip..]
TF>> I hate MIME forwarding, because you always have to click on the
TF>> attachment. ;-)
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Thomas,
TF> Why don't you archive the normal messages, as you have downloaded them
TF> anyway? Aren't you doubling the space needed?
i purge th
Hello Tom Plunket,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 01:21:02 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, January 17, 2000, 4:21:02 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Tom Plunket wrote:
t>> Anyone getting locked out of a pop server as its in use should
t>> consider doing that unless the server malfunctions it mea
Morning Steve Lamb,
> Losing the current marked text. Why bother? Ever try to remark 9 pages of
> text because of a missed line? You're also assuming that "home" takes to
> where I want, which it does not. In this one case...
Luckily TB editor will allow you to add selection on both ends
Morning tracer,
> I would like a macro to have in the signatures the various specific address
> items which can be overwritten per folder/account. Ie, phone, address,
> website etc etc which one can add for different usages. Now what the most
> easy and eficient way is to use them
Hi Tom,
On 17 January 2000 at 01:35:51 GMT -0800 (which was 09:35 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
MDP>> I've started having "send" troubles since 1.38e. I must admit that
MDP>> IMHO the problem has been server-side, but I thought I'd mention it to
MDP>> see if
Hi Januk,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 01:31:15 -0800GMT (17/01/2000, 17:31 +0800GMT),
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
JA> Well, you sort of can, if you are redirecting one message at a time,
JA> TB allows you to edit the message, so you could put it at the top of
JA> the message, or in the header, where you wa
Hi Steve,
On 17 January 2000 at 00:41:56 GMT -0800 (which was 08:41 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
SL> Losing the current marked text. Why bother? Ever try to remark 9
SL> pages of text because of a missed line? You're also assuming that
SL> "home" takes to whe
Hello Jast,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:45:35 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, January 17, 2000, 4:45:35 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Jast wrote:
Jast> Morning Tom Plunket,
>> Ok, again I haven't tried any of these but I assume the Blocks
>> selection is a radio button (exactly one of the
Hi Allie,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 04:06:36 -0500GMT (17/01/2000, 17:06 +0800GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
>> I hate MIME forwarding, because you always have to click on the
>> attachment. ;-)
AM> Ah, but the recipient, however, does get his message *intact*, headers
AM> and all. Redirecting the me
Morning Steve Lamb,
>Geh, rather have checkboxes so it is clear what is happening and what
> isn't. I'd also rather have the sig separated from the template so you can
> have a clear sig for each folder without using an include.
I might not be much of a programmer, but to me the template w
Morning Tom Plunket,
> Ok, again I haven't tried any of these but I assume the Blocks
> selection is a radio button (exactly one of them always selected).
Correction: These are not radio buttons. However the Persistent
Blocks option disables the Overwrite Blocks options because of the
reasons
Morning Allie Martin,
> This option restricts you to being able to delete selected blocks of
> text only via the Edit|delete menu option. The delete key will not work.
> :) I guess it's a safe-guard of sorts for those who tend to accidentally
> deselect their selected text.
Note: with "Pers
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 09:04:58 + GMT your local time,
which was Monday, January 17, 2000, 4:04:58 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
Marck> I often (these days) go to send a mail and the Sending dialog just
Marck> hangs. My SMTP server i
MDP> I've started having "send" troubles since 1.38e. I must admit that
MDP> IMHO the problem has been server-side, but I thought I'd mention it to
MDP> see if anyone else had seen anything.
Maybe APOP is screwing you up? Try turning that off and see if it
helps (with the added "bonus" of ha
Hello Thomas,
Monday, January 17, 2000, 12:28:27 AM, you wrote:
> why I want to redirect; again the final
> recipient can hit "reply" and will send his reply to the original
> sender. However, I want him to know that *I* redirected the msg to
> him. This does not mean that I take responsibility
t> Anyone getting locked out of a pop server as its in use should
t> consider doing that unless the server malfunctions it means
t> exactly what it says, you mailbox is in use, either by yourself with a
t> second account or by an unauthised reader. Which also may mean a
t> password change of the
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:41:56 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
>> I prefer to have 5 specialized editors rather than one capable of doing 5
>> tasks. Because combined mixer and coffee grinder is bad mixer and bad coffee
>> grinder.
> *ROFL*
> Mail Client - Coffee Mixer
> Internal
Hello Oleg Zalyalov,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:37:50 +0400 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, January 17, 2000, 3:37:50 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
Oleg> Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Oleg> Monday, January 17, 2000, Thomas Fernandez wrote to tracer about
Oleg> Error Mes
Hi Steve,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:28:51 -0800GMT (17/01/2000, 16:28 +0800GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> How about following conventions in the mailing culture being the
>> reason why? ;-) Here is what I mean (and I am not as good in wording
>> as you are):
SL> Doing so would dictate that the Rep
Hi Oleg,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:37:50 +0400GMT (17/01/2000, 16:37 +0800GMT),
Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
OZ> It can be if you DUN session was aborted unexpectedly while connected
OZ> to POP server. If so ask your POP provider about timeout set at POP
OZ> server.
No; this happens to me often. The e
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 16:28:27 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
[..snip..]
> I hate MIME forwarding, because you always have to click on the
> attachment. ;-)
Ah, but the recipient, however, does get his message *intact*, headers
and all. Redirecting the message will alter the headers . for
Hi tracer,
On 17 January 2000 at 10:33:28 GMT +0700 (which was 03:33 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
Lone-Wolf>> SEND- Server reports error. The response is :Bad sequence
Lone-Wolf>> of commands (quite frequently - mail cannot be sent but
Lone-Wolf>> finally g
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:28:51 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> My opinion on this is therefore: The reply-to address is the default
>> for replying. I don't want a pop-up window, as I don't want a pop-up
>> window for a missing subject. It is the same case for me.
> Until the first time someone se
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:22:21 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, January 17, 2000, 3:22:21 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve> Friday, January 14, 2000, 6:39:05 PM, Jast wrote:
>> A checkbox option that should be a macro...
>> I think *all* message-s
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 16:06:01 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, January 17, 2000, 3:06:01 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas> Hi tracer,
Thomas> On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:33:28 +0700GMT (17/01/2000, 11:33 +0800GMT),
Thomas> tracer wrote:
L
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:21:01 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
>> Well, technically, if I were to go along with you, the editor should
>> not place anything in the header of replies because one, it's assuming
>> that you wish to use the reply to address (duh) and two, it's wrongfully
>> as
Saturday, January 15, 2000, 8:06:40 AM, Allie wrote:
> Yes, this different slant that different editors tend to be better at
> editing for different tasks, tends deviate from the strength in Steve's
> point. A single editor ideal for *all* tasks is a less likely scenario than
> a single editor for
Saturday, January 15, 2000, 7:57:02 AM, Allie wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, I had a look around and cannot seem to find an
> editor that will work as well as TB!'s with respect to formatting and
> reflowing *quoted* text. Boxer 99 comes very close and of course is
> superior at formatting un
Saturday, January 15, 2000, 3:51:02 AM, Oleg wrote:
> That is almost exactly what I mean all this time. Just one more point. Steve
> states that if there will bie an option of using an external editor RitLabs
> will have more time to concentrate on mail-oriented features of TB! I still
> think tha
Saturday, January 15, 2000, 1:58:51 AM, Oleg wrote:
> At least I have need in preview when killing mail. The preview in TB! is
> based on the editor. Or should there be external message viewer also?
It isn't based on the editor. It is the other way around. The preview is
just a viewing obje
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Monday, January 17, 2000, Thomas Fernandez wrote to tracer about
Error Messages:
TF> Yes; the way I understand it, only one pop access per time is allowed.
TF> So, if your mailbox is "in use", check whether any other of your email
TF> clients is automatically pop
Hi Allie,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 02:59:12 -0500GMT (17/01/2000, 15:59 +0800GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
TP>>> Perhaps if you want to forward something to someone, you just Forward
TP>>> it rather than redirect it? If I'm "bouncing" something to someone
TP>>> else, I would prefer that my name not be
Friday, January 14, 2000, 7:17:54 PM, Thomas wrote:
> How about following conventions in the mailing culture being the
> reason why? ;-) Here is what I mean (and I am not as good in wording
> as you are):
Doing so would dictate that the Reply-to is not set 1/2 the time. :P
> 1.) Reply-to me
Friday, January 14, 2000, 6:39:05 PM, Jast wrote:
> A checkbox option that should be a macro...
> I think *all* message-specific options should be macros because this
> allows for better automation per template-file-inclusion - you won't
> have to go through a dozen folder checkbox options and
Friday, January 14, 2000, 5:07:15 PM, Allie wrote:
> Well, technically, if I were to go along with you, the editor should
> not place anything in the header of replies because one, it's assuming
> that you wish to use the reply to address (duh) and two, it's wrongfully
> assuming that you'll w
Hello Allie Martin,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 02:54:34 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, January 17, 2000, 2:54:34 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie Martin wrote:
Allie> On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 23:32:06 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
>>> Heh, oops. What I'm talking about is what you get when yo
Hello Nick Andriash,
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 23:04:48 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, January 17, 2000, 2:04:48 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Nick Andriash wrote:
Nick> Not really Tom... we may be talking about different things here, not
Nick> sure? What I'm referring to is the preferen
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
