quot;Filter" line, the "{0\0D\0A}" (the second character may vary from 0 to
3) sequence stands for that empty block you want to delete. Just delete it,
copy the text and paste it into Sorting Office as a new filter.
--
Bes
On Tuesday, May 11, 2021, 14:04:48, Stefan Tanurkov via TBUDL wrote:
> You can delete block when the related AND/OR selector is selected
OK, my problem is that the block is the first thing in the list, so it doesn't
have a related operator.
--
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><><
Hello Jernej,
> I added a block by accident in one of my Sorting office filters - how do I
> delete it? I can delete everything inside the block, but the block itself
> remains (and if I close and re-open the sorting office, it usually contains
> "Sender contains" filter
I added a block by accident in one of my Sorting office filters - how do I
delete it? I can delete everything inside the block, but the block itself
remains (and if I close and re-open the sorting office, it usually contains
"Sender contains" filter with empty text, which then mat
This follows my prior post in which I asked how to restore lost filters.
After searching the forums at the Ritlabs website, I discovered that I could
restore the filters by highlighting the account for which I wished to restore
filers, clicking on "account" and then "sorting
Hi, Everyone,
I have 20 mail accounts and most of them have filters. The filters for one of
these accounts, which has one of the largest set of filters - 20 of them - have
all disappeared. This happened overnight, when my laptop was taken over by an
unannounced Windows updates (grrr).
Hello Roelof,
This is what you said on Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:50:31 +0200 your time:
Off hand I can't think of any example where using 'continue
processing' isn't contra-productive.
Well I created a main filter, set the condition for it to Any Message, and
then added sub filters to
Hi Roelof,
Le lundi 29 juin 2009 à 12:50:31, vous écriviez :
My suggestion would be to add all list addresses to a single address
book group and and check whether the To header is part of that AB
group.
And forget about 'continue processing with other filters', that's not
necessary
Hello TBUDL,
Although a long time user of TB! I've never used subfilters.
I belong to a number of lists, including this one, so I want to 'group' the
filters for all lists under one main filter rather than having separate
filters in the filter list for each one.
Can I create a filter
Hallo Simon,
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:26:39 +0100GMT (29-6-2009, 11:26 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
P Can I create a filter without any condition/action, other than to continue
processing
P other filters?
A filter without conditions won't be triggered by any message, what
you need is a
Hi
On Monday 29 June 2009 at 11:50:31 AM, in
mid:72940933.20090629125...@otten.tv, Roelof Otten wrote:
A filter without conditions won't be triggered by
any message,
He could just use the condition any message. (-;
what you need is a filter that's triggered
only by message list
Hallo MFPA,
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:33:03 +0100GMT (29-6-2009, 17:33 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
A filter without conditions won't be triggered by
any message,
M He could just use the condition any message. (-;
He could, but then he would need to set the option 'continue
filters, moving various email to three different folders. I manually ran
the filter and the subfilters worked. Looking at the sorting office, I found
that TB! adds back a Sender Contains [ ] condition, even after you delete it
and okay it. So this condition is obviously deliberately or inadvertently
met
On 23 August 2008, 02:33, Roelof Otten wrote:
In that case check your condition again, might be a matter of a
trailing space that's been copied along while it shouldn't have been.
Happened once to me, I couldn't understand why my filter didn't get
triggered..
~~~
Thanks again Roelof,
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3
Sorry for this, but yet another issue with SO filters. I'm trying to
dump incoming messages that are apparently older than 30 days to my
spam bin. The filter is the topmost in the list. In the Advanced tab,
I selected Message is
Hallo Geoff,
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:25:54 +0100GMT (22-8-2008, 16:25 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
GL Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3
GL Sorry for this, but yet another issue with SO filters. I'm trying to
GL dump incoming messages that are apparently older
On 22 August 2008, 17:26, Roelof Otten wrote:
I don't know whether you're missing something about how filters are
working nor do I know about any issues between TB v1 and Windows XP.
However, what I do know is that when you're using 92 filters, it's
easy to have some other filter interfering
Hallo Geoff,
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:35:35 +0100GMT (22-8-2008, 18:35 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
GL Thanks. For info, I already did as you suggested without success. The
GL two filters I'm having trouble with are the top two in the list. I've
GL also tried moving them down a couple of
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3
Although I've used TB for years (as you can probably tell from the
version I'm using), I'm having trouble with one particular Sorting
Office filter. My ISP adds a special header on which I want to filter.
Pressing F9 to show
Hallo Geoff,
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:40:38 +0100GMT (14-8-2008, 14:40 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
GL X-pstn-xfilter: y
GL I've copied this and pasted it into the signal string cell of the
GL filter, set Presence to Yes, and tried setting the location to Kludges
GL and then, when that
On 14 August 2008, 15:04, Roelof Otten wrote:
The first thing that comes to mind is that you might have something
like a trailing space in your condition string.
Kludges would be the right location.
~~~
Thanks for that. I checked and there are no trailing spaces. I copied
the header to the
I recently started using SubFilters and am getting some filtering I
don't understand...
I have a Filter called Set Color that does nothing and is set to
Continue processing with other filters, in it for example is a
SubFilter to change any message from family (based on AB group) to blue
in the
Hello Tim,
TM Here is where it gets interesting! The SubFilter to move the message
TM is not set to Continue processing with other filters, but it does
TM continue processing the other filters!
The Continue... option works only for a single level. If you want to
stop after a sub-filter was
Hallo Tim,
On Wed, 28 May 2008 08:07:09 -0400GMT (28-5-2008, 14:07 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
TM I have a Filter called Set Color that does nothing and is set to
TM Continue processing with other filters, in it for example is a
TM SubFilter to change any message from family (based on AB
On Wed, 28 May 2008 at 20:18:11 +0200, Roelof wrote: Hallo Tim,
You've enabled 'continue processing...' in order to enable the
filtering with suhfilters, is that it? You don't have to, as
A cliff-hanger ending! You have to wait for the next episode for the
answer.
--
Robin
Using The Bat!
Hallo Robin,
On Thu, 29 May 2008 06:22:22 +1000GMT (28-5-2008, 22:22 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RA A cliff-hanger ending! You have to wait for the next episode for the
RA answer.
Oops! I deleted too much. I elaborated unnecessarily and I
subsequently I cut too much. :-)
--
Groetjes,
Hallo Tim,
On Wed, 28 May 2008 08:07:09 -0400GMT (28-5-2008, 14:07 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
TM I have a Filter called Set Color that does nothing and is set to
TM Continue processing with other filters, in it for example is a
TM SubFilter to change any message from family (based on AB
Hello Batfolk,
I'm trying to build a set of filters to better track emails I'm
waiting to get an answer back. I currently have a folder @WAITING
FOR that I copy things from my sent folder, or drag emails I've
forwarded to someone else to work on (delegated).
My idea is I'd put some text in the
Andrew Diederich wrote:
AD I'm trying to build a set of filters to better track emails I'm
AD waiting to get an answer back. I currently have a folder
AD @WAITING FOR that I copy things from my sent folder, or drag
AD emails I've forwarded to someone else to work on (delegated).
Another
Hello George,
Monday, April 30, 2007, 3:17:52 PM, you wrote:
Andrew Diederich wrote:
AD I'm trying to build a set of filters to better track emails I'm
AD waiting to get an answer back. I currently have a folder
AD @WAITING FOR that I copy things from my sent folder, or drag
AD emails I've
Sunday, April 22, 2007, 1:42:07 AM, Roger wrote:
I see you are using Voyager and unfortunately I cannot test that, but the
latest version of The Bat! certainly will forward messages automatically and
I can edit the forwarding filter. In case you are interested, the latest
version,
redirect, but I think the inability to change the forward template for
AD the sorting office filter is a bug. Does that sound true?
I see you are using Voyager and unfortunately I cannot test that, but the
latest version of The Bat! certainly will forward messages automatically and
I can edit
Hello Andrew,
Friday, April 20, 2007, 8:40:41 AM, you wrote:
AD The issue I have is the forward doesn't allow me to change the
AD template.
In my experience, forwarding anything with filters just doesn't
work right. Particularly if there is an html or jpg attachments
(I have not tested
Hello Batfolk,
I'm testing out a new mailserver (Zimbra) at work, so I've configured
sorting office in TB! to forward all messages sent to recipient (me@)
to forward to metest@, and then those get into the test mailserver.
The idea is so I can use the Zimbra mail client for a while to see how
Hi All,
Which to use: matches any, contains any, something else?
Not sure which is best, to achieve the following goal:
I've got an address book group Customer. I'd like to move all
email from anyone in that group to a folder. I'm hoping that I can
use:
Sender contains any Customer/Recipient
Hallo David,
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:44:27 +0100GMT (21-1-2007, 9:44 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
DE I've got an address book group Customer. I'd like to move all
DE email from anyone in that group to a folder. I'm hoping that I can
DE use:
DE Sender contains any Customer/Recipient contains
Hi Roelof,
RO Hallo David,
RO On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:44:27 +0100GMT (21-1-2007, 9:44 +0100, where I
RO live), you wrote:
DE I've got an address book group Customer. I'd like to move all
DE email from anyone in that group to a folder. I'm hoping that I can
DE use:
DE Sender contains any
Hallo Paul,
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:27:28 +1000GMT (18-1-2007, 6:27 , where I
live), you wrote:
PB When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles
PB endlessly, and have to close the bat from task manager.
Can't confirm that with any version. Looks like something might
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thursday, January 18, 2007, 3:45:06 PM, you wrote:
RA On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 at 15:27:28 +1000, Paul wrote:
When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles
endlessly, and have to close the bat from task manager.
RA I don't experience a problem. What do
editor, delete the filter from
the sorting office, close and open TB and paste it back.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Real SysOps hate authors of bad Shareware programs begging for money.
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 3.95.8
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thursday, January 18, 2007, 3:45:06 PM, you wrote:
RA On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 at 15:27:28 +1000, Paul wrote:
When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles
endlessly, and have to close the bat from task manager.
RA I don't experience a problem. What do
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thursday, January 18, 2007, 7:14:04 PM, you wrote:
ASK Hello Paul Berger everyone else,
ASK on Thursday, January 18, 2007 at 11:04 you (Paul Berger) wrote:
So it may be some corruption in that particular filter, that has 27
conditions in it.
ASK You could copy
paste the filter here for others to try it.
RO He could copy and paste it to a text editor, delete the filter from
RO the sorting office, close and open TB and paste it back.
Thanks, tried this and also your first idea:
Creating a backup and restoring it might solve that.
No success.
However
paste the filter here for others to try it.
RO He could copy and paste it to a text editor, delete the filter from
RO the sorting office, close and open TB and paste it back.
Thanks everyone for all the prompt help.
It seems that it is best to limit each filter to 16 conditions. For
additional
Hi Paul,
on Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:04:42 +1000GMT (18.01.2007, 11:04 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles
endlessly, and have to close the bat from task manager.
RA I don't experience a problem. What do you mean by recycles?
PB The problem
Hello Paul,
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:04:42 +1000 GMT (18/01/2007, 17:04 +0700 GMT),
Paul Berger wrote:
PB The problem seems to be in only one of the filters. If I try to
PB another condition, the list fades on screen and moves down the page,
PB but never stops doing this.
It does, eventually.
Hello Alexander,
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:03:36 +0100 GMT (18/01/2007, 18:03 +0700 GMT),
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
It seems that it is best to limit each filter to 16 conditions. For
additional conditions, use additional filter(s).
Then there is no problem.
ASK It would surprise me if the
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thursday, January 18, 2007, 11:31:12 PM, you wrote:
PM Hi Paul,
PM on Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:04:42 +1000GMT (18.01.2007, 11:04 +0100GMT here),
PM you wrote:
When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles
endlessly, and have to close the bat from task
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Friday, January 19, 2007, 12:26:21 AM, you wrote:
TF Hello Paul,
TF On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:04:42 +1000 GMT (18/01/2007, 17:04 +0700 GMT),
TF Paul Berger wrote:
PB The problem seems to be in only one of the filters. If I try to
PB another condition, the list fades on
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thursday, January 18, 2007, 8:27:20 PM, you wrote:
ASK Hello Paul Berger everyone else,
ASK on Thursday, January 18, 2007 at 11:30 you (Paul Berger) wrote:
So it may be some corruption in that particular filter, that has 27
conditions in it.
ASK You could copy
Hi Paul,
on Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:07:55 +1000GMT (19.01.2007, 00:07 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
PB The problem seems to be in only one of the filters. If I try to
PB another condition, the list fades on screen and moves down the page,
PB but never stops doing this.
PB Have since added an extra
When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles
endlessly, and have to close the bat from task manager.
Before I uninstall and reinstall an older version, is there a better
fix?
--
Paul
When i try to add a filter, sorting office recycles endlessly and have
to stop the bat from task manager.
Is there a fix for this, or do I uninstall to reinstall an older
version?
--
Paul
-
Using The Bat
in the sorting office with the focus on the
FOLDERS tab (POP account in read or replied messages, or anywhere in
IMAP account), folder selections 'stick' between filters.
If I have TRASH ticked in one filter, then switch to a filter
immediately above or below which has just the INBOX checked
Hello djb!
On Sunday, May 15, 2005, 5:08 AM, you wrote:
Does anyone happen to know if the inbuilt bug-reporting email set-up
actually works? (HELPFeedbackBug Report) Or does one have to go
through the web-site?
To my best knowledge, it does not work.
One must go here and register first, and
It's a complex site. If you have difficulties navigating it, please
report and ask here. Either I or some other fellow subscriber will try
to help you.
Thankyou Mary.
Bug reported here:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4657
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello djb,
I guess what I want to know is whether this is just a GUI glitch or
whether the underlying settings are actually being modified.
As far as I could verify this is only a GUI glitch and added a note
about to https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4657
--
Best regards,
Miguel A.
Hello djb,
d If I have TRASH ticked in one filter, then switch to a filter
d immediately above or below which has just the INBOX checked, the TRASH
d remains checked also.
Fixed, thank you!
--
Cheers!
Stefan
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using
Can someone else confirm this?
In the Sorting Office, switching between filters while viewing the
'folders' tab, selected folders 'stick' between each filter.
If I have TRASH ticked in one filter, then switch to a filter
immediately above or below which has just the INBOX checked, the TRASH
Hello djb everyone else,
on 14-Mai-2005 at 12:19 you (djb) wrote:
In the Sorting Office, switching between filters while viewing the
'folders' tab, selected folders 'stick' between each filter.
Which 'folders' tab do you mean? I can't find such a thing in my sorting
office.
--
Best regards
Hi Alexander,
you wrote:
Which 'folders' tab do you mean? I can't find such a thing in my sorting
office.
The one in the right-hand pane.
Click on a filter and a set of tabs appears on the right...
General|Actions|Options|Folders|Statistics
a handy feature of the sorting office is that you
Hello djb everyone else,
on 14-Mai-2005 at 13:36 you (djb) wrote:
Which 'folders' tab do you mean? I can't find such a thing in my sorting
office.
The one in the right-hand pane.
Click on a filter and a set of tabs appears on the right...
General|Actions|Options|Folders|Statistics
I do
Hello Alexander,
In the Sorting Office, switching between filters while viewing the
'folders' tab, selected folders 'stick' between each filter.
Which 'folders' tab do you mean? I can't find such a thing in my sorting
office.
Folders tab is only available for Read and Replied filters
Hi MAU,
Folders tab is only available for Read and Replied filters, not for
Incoming or Outgoing.
Well in my sorting office I have a folders tab in the 'Incoming Mail'
filters, even if I create a new one, and this is where the problem is
occurring.
(I don't want to go into my other folder
Hello MAU everyone else,
on 14-Mai-2005 at 14:01 you (MAU) wrote:
Which 'folders' tab do you mean? I can't find such a thing in my sorting
office.
Folders tab is only available for Read and Replied filters, not for
Incoming or Outgoing.
I see. I don't have defined such filters
Hi Alexander,
I do see those tabs, but... I don't have a Folders tab there. Which type of
filter is this, Incoming Filter, Selective Download, Outgoing... ?
For Common Filters I have an additional Share With tab, but no Folders
tab either.
The problem is that I'm using IMAP : )
POP
Folders tab is only available for Read and Replied filters, not for
Incoming or Outgoing.
Well in my sorting office I have a folders tab in the 'Incoming Mail'
filters, even if I create a new one, and this is where the problem is
occurring.
(I don't want to go into my other folder trees
djb,
On 14-05-2005 12:19, you [d] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
d Can someone else confirm this?
Just tried it: Confirmed for IMAP.
Interestingly enough if you have Any folder set, it is not a problem.
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 3.5
Hello djb everyone else,
on 14-Mai-2005 at 14:16 you (djb) wrote:
The problem is that I'm using IMAP : )
Maybe you can be a bit more precise right from the start next time. Thanks.
I can't be of any further help, I'm only using POP accounts.
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Hello djb,
Folders tab in Incoming Messages on an IMAP account
Ah! OK! I have no IMAP account. I was therefore talking about POP
accounts.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5
Current version is 3.5 |
Hello Alexander,
Folders tab is only available for Read and Replied filters, not for
Incoming or Outgoing.
I see. I don't have defined such filters. :-)
Apparently Folders tab is available for Incoming on IMAP accounts.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The
Maybe you can be a bit more precise right from the start next time. Thanks.
Simple mistake Alexander. I /was/ quite precise if you re-read my first
message.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
After the USA, Australia Norway are the world's
. Clicking through them the problem
reoccurred, then closing the Sorting Office and re-opening it the
first 4 folders had the Inbox and Keep checked. Closing it and opening
it again the first 4 had the Inbox checked only. Closing it and
opening it yet again all filters had Inbox, Keep, and Sent
Hello djb everyone else,
on 14-Mai-2005 at 18:32 you (djb) wrote:
Maybe you can be a bit more precise right from the start next time. Thanks.
Simple mistake Alexander. I /was/ quite precise if you re-read my first
message.
IMAP?
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ
IMAP?
POP?
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
The International Centre for Nonviolent Communication: http://www.cnvc.org
Using V 3.5 on Windows XP
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL'
Hello djb everyone else,
on 14-Mai-2005 at 20:36 you (djb) wrote:
IMAP?
POP?
You could file a bug report to start with. Don't forget to mention that
you're using IMAP, so that the POP users won't be irritated and waste their
time trying to reproduce it, otherwise the bug report may end up
You could file a bug report to start with. Don't forget to mention that
you're using IMAP, so that the POP users won't be irritated and waste their
time trying to reproduce it, otherwise the bug report may end up with a
verify fail status, which would be a pity, wouldn't it.
Hmpf!
In my
RO You don't have a lot of filters, so you could try this.
RO Copy and paste your filters from the sorting office to a text editor.
RO Close TB
RO Delete the account.srb file for the Wil account
RO Restart TB
RO Paste your filters back to the sorting office
Ok, I've deleted account.srb.
I've
Hi,
On Thursday, November 18, 2004 at 11:57:36 AM, WilWilWil wrote:
Since this morning, when I go to filters of my accounts, in
Incoming rules, I can see my 10 rules like yesterday, but more,
there is now a sub-folder created named Moving in Hooks !
I never saw that before, and I'm sure
Hello Roelof,
W Since this morning, when I go to filters of my accounts, in
W Incoming rules, I can see my 10 rules like yesterday, but more,
W there is now a sub-folder created named Moving in Hooks !
W I never saw that before, and I'm sure I've not created this
W folder. I'm sure because TB
later on a new message from same source did create the
M folder. Although I think he is a bit ambiguous what talking about
M filters (or rules) and folders and sub-folders.
Well, check the screenshot, it really looks like a subfolder in the
sorting office.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
In spite
!
Ludovic's message gave me an idea, your known filter has disappeared.
I guess that's a tiny bit of filter corruption.
You don't have a lot of filters, so you could try this.
Copy and paste your filters from the sorting office to a text editor.
Close TB
Delete the account.srb file for the Wil
(or rules) and folders and sub-folders.
Well, check the screenshot, it really looks like a subfolder in the
sorting office.
You are right, I didn't pay attention to the icons. It may be then just
an icon display problem as Outgoing, Read, etc., also display a folder
icon. Wierd!
I thought he
Hello MAU,
I thought he was referring to the fact of the fact being created.
^
|
filter ---
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using
are in the Sorting Office where
Moving In, Moving Out, etc. are possible and the term Hooks is used
in programming, maybe it has somehow grabbed this code from within
The Bat! inadvertently. I have noticed recently that weird things
seem to happen, as if code branches to somewhere it shouldn't
Hallo WilWilWil,
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:57:36 +0100GMT (18-11-2004, 11:57 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
W Since this morning, when I go to filters of my accounts, in
W Incoming rules, I can see my 10 rules like yesterday, but more,
W there is now a sub-folder created named Moving in Hooks !
RO I've got no idea what you mean. Could you make a screenshot and place
RO it somewhere on line?
RO When you've got no means of placing things on line, send it via PM to
RO me. Attached pictures are discouraged on this list.
Thank you for you offer. I send you a capture now in PM.
--
Hallo WilWilWil,
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:57:36 +0100GMT (18-11-2004, 11:57 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
W Since this morning, when I go to filters of my accounts, in
W Incoming rules, I can see my 10 rules like yesterday, but more,
W there is now a sub-folder created named Moving in Hooks !
Hello,
Since this morning, when I go to filters of my accounts, in Incoming rules, I
can see my 10 rules like yesterday, but more, there is now a sub-folder created
named Moving in Hooks !
I never saw that before, and I'm sure I've not created this folder. I'm sure
because TB authorize me to
and
installing with .msi).
2) The Help menu to display What's New in Version 3 rather than
What's New in Version 2. Again, that was a bug in the .msi shared by
a number of beta testers.
So, it's possible that the Sorting OFFice Actions in the title bar of
the Sorting Office window is another bug which got
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:42:32 +0200 (8:42 AM EDT here) Roelof Otten wrote:
Hallo Everybody,
For my needs the sorting office is definitely lacking a condition.
When matching the recipients to an AB group, you can pick from: AB
group contains - Sender First recipient
Hallo Everybody,
For my needs the sorting office is definitely lacking a condition.
When matching the recipients to an AB group, you can pick from:
AB group contains - Sender
First recipient
All recipients
Sender
Hello All,
When I go into the sorting office with Ctrl-shift and look at the
Folder tab for filters under replied and read messages I see some
folders that are ticket.
In most cases this is the inbox. But when I click on an other
filter the folder box will not refresh and still show the ticks
Hello Edgar,
The folder tab will only refresh when selecting an other tab and
then go back to the folder tab.
Is this a known bug?
As you can see in my signature I'm using 3.0.0.11 (a beta post 3.0) and it is
working fine here. So, maybe it was and has already been corrected.
--
Best
Hi Bat! Fans,
I see there is a new category for Common Filters.
Presumably these filters apply to all mail accounts where there is more than
one? (Which IMO is great).
How to move existing filters into a common filter folder?
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
Using The Bat! v3.0 on
Hello John,
Presumably these filters apply to all mail accounts where there is more than
one? (Which IMO is great).
In Common Filters there is 'Share with..' tab where you can select which
accounts will use each filter.
How to move existing filters into a common filter folder?
So far I
Hi,
I amusing V3
Can anyone tell me how to move all my filters to common so that I can
then share them with the relevant accounts?
Also is there any reason not to put all the filters in common and
share them as appropriate?
Thanks
PJ
Current
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 8:03:43 PM, Paul Jansen wrote:
[snips]
Paul I amusing V3
Fascinating typo. (Assuming it is that, of course :-)
--
cheers, Mic (reply address works)
Get all the fools on your side and you can be elected to anything.
Frank Dane
Hello Paul,
Can anyone tell me how to move all my filters to common so that I can
then share them with the relevant accounts?
The only way I know so far is Copy (Cut) Paste .
Also is there any reason not to put all the filters in common and
share them as appropriate?
There are many for
Miguel,
Can anyone tell me how to move all my filters to common so that I
can then share them with the relevant accounts?
The only way I know so far is Copy (Cut) Paste .
Is there a way to copy and paste multiple filters? Or do I have to do
them one at a time, which will be very painful.
1 - 100 of 274 matches
Mail list logo
