Re: Read Filters

2004-02-06 Thread Allie Martin
as you read/browse them. To mark multiple messages as read would amount to a manual action and read filters aren't triggered then. -- -= allie_M =- | List Moderator PGPKeys - http://pgp.ac-martin.com Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL

Re: Read Filters

2004-02-06 Thread MAU
Hello Allie, Normally, the filter is triggered when unread messages are automatically marked as read as you read/browse them. To mark multiple messages as read would amount to a manual action and read filters aren't triggered then. I mark my messages as read manually, by hitting Space when I

Re: Read Filters

2004-02-06 Thread Allie Martin
Mau, [M] wrote: M I mark my messages as read manually, by hitting Space when I decide I M _have_ read them. That is a manual action, isn't it? AFAIK, the shortcut to mark a message read is CTRL-M. What does hitting space do for you? Move to another message? -- -= allie_M =- | List

Re: Read Filters

2004-02-06 Thread MAU
Hello Allie, AFAIK, the shortcut to mark a message read is CTRL-M. Not in my TB :) What does hitting space do for you? Move to another message? No, Space marks as read and Enter moves to next unread. Remember what Al+F2 does? It opens the shortcut editor :-) -- Best regards, Miguel A.

Re[2]: Read Filters

2004-02-06 Thread Peter Ouwehand
Hello MAU, on Sat, 7 Feb 2004 01:56:32 +0100 (2004-02-07 01:56:32 in .nl) in the message with reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you [] wrote (at least in part): M Remember what Al+F2 does? It opens the shortcut editor :-) I don't 'remember' what yours does, but here it does a 'Check Mail For

Re: Read Filters

2004-02-06 Thread MAU
Hello Peter, M Remember what Al+F2 does? It opens the shortcut editor :-) I don't 'remember' what yours does, but here it does a 'Check Mail For All'. Messed up shortcuts maybe..?? Oooops! I meant to type Alt+F12, Alt+F12. Sorry -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)

Re[2]: Read Filters

2004-02-06 Thread Peter Ouwehand
Hello MAU, on Sat, 7 Feb 2004 02:59:09 +0100 (2004-02-07 02:59:09 in .nl) in the message with reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you [] wrote (at least in part): Messed up shortcuts maybe..?? M Oooops! I meant to type Alt+F12, Alt+F12. Sorry Ok, so it does here. But somehow I can't seem to link

Re: Read Filters

2004-02-06 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Fri, 6. Feb 2004 at 17:30:57 +0100 MAU wrote: M I use many Read filters but I always use/used them on single messages. M You are right, it doesn't work if multiple messages are selected. What I M don't know is if it should work that way and it can then be considered a M bug. /me

Re: Wilcards Strings In Filters

2003-12-04 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Jernej, Wednesday, December 3, 2003, 4:49:44 PM, you wrote: JS I think that you have to run regedt32.exe instead of regedit.exe JS in Win2k to be able to set permissions on registry keys. You are correct. -- Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user). Using The Bat! 2.01.56 under

Re: Wilcards Strings In Filters

2003-12-03 Thread Steve Mulhall
Hi Thomas Just don't type anything instead of a wildcard character. So, if you want to find all messages containing Read: in the subject, use this (without the quotes) as the filter string. It will be caught even if there is something else in the subject. Thanks mate. I did manage to work

Re: Wilcards Strings In Filters

2003-12-03 Thread Carsten Thönges
* Steve Mulhall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is it possible to to add a search string with a wildcard in a filter? Yes. The Bat! supports »Regular Expressions«. A good point to start your research is http://www.regenechsen.de/regex_en/regex_1_en.html. I want to create a filter that filters all

Re: Wilcards Strings In Filters

2003-12-03 Thread Simon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Steve, On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 08:01:17 + your time, you said: ..snip.. SM Is there anything else anyone can think of that may be causing SM this? PIMs will often steal associations as well, or any software that has combined mail handling

Re: Wilcards Strings In Filters

2003-12-03 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Tuesday, December 02, 2003, Carsten Thönges wrote... I want to create a filter that filters all Read receipts into a specified folder. The only thing that all of these receipts has in common is that the subject line starts with the word Read: so I want my filter to just identify all

Re: Wilcards Strings In Filters

2003-12-03 Thread Carsten Thönges
* Jonathan Angliss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tuesday, December 02, 2003, Carsten Thönges wrote... I want to create a filter that filters all Read receipts into a specified folder. The only thing that all of these receipts has in common is that the subject line starts with the word Read

Re: Wilcards Strings In Filters

2003-12-03 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Wednesday, December 03, 2003, Carsten Thönges wrote... It depends on what you choose as your filter location: »^Read« works for location=subject. »^Subject:\s+Read« works for location=kludges. Ahhh... never considered running it like that... I assume TB strips out the extra spaces in the

Re: Wilcards Strings In Filters

2003-12-03 Thread Zeynel A. ztrk
Hello, Tuesday, December 2, 2003, 2:34:25 PM, you wrote: SM Another quick one, at various points during the day, although sometimes SM maybe only once The Bat! loses its file associations with .EML and SM .VCF files and obviously on opening asks if I want to associate. I am using WinXP, I hope

Re: Wilcards Strings In Filters

2003-12-03 Thread Jernej Simoni
On Thursday, December 4, 2003, 0:28:32, Zeynel A. ztrk wrote: If you are advanced user and know about registry you may try setting permissions for these registry keys: I think that you have to run regedt32.exe instead of regedit.exe in Win2k to be able to set permissions on registry keys. --

Wilcards Strings In Filters

2003-12-02 Thread Steve Mulhall
Hi all, Is it possible to to add a search string with a wildcard in a filter? I want to create a filter that filters all Read receipts into a specified folder. The only thing that all of these receipts has in common is that the subject line starts with the word Read: so I want my filter to just

Wilcards Strings In Filters

2003-12-02 Thread Steve Mulhall
Is it possible to to add a search string with a wildcard in a filter? Don't worry chaps, I've worked this out now. Remarkably simply really The file association is still a bit of an inconvenience though (no more than that though but any suggestions very welcome).

Re: Wilcards Strings In Filters

2003-12-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Steve, On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:34:25 + GMT (02/12/2003, 19:34 +0700 GMT), Steve Mulhall wrote: Is it possible to to add a search string with a wildcard in a filter? Just don't type anything instead of a wildcard character. So, if you want to find all messages containing Read: in the

Processing filters against address book

2003-11-26 Thread DOLIST Support Information
Hello, Is it possible to do a filter rule something like : when a mail arrives and if the sender is this person in address book (considering all its address e-mail) do thank you for your help. Yours faithfully, -- DOLIST Support Information

Re: Processing filters against address book

2003-11-26 Thread MAU
Hello DOLIST, Is it possible to do a filter rule something like : when a mail arrives and if the sender is this person in address book (considering all its address e-mail) do Take a look at the Advanced tab of filter rules (scroll it down). -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El

Re: Processing filters against address book

2003-11-26 Thread DOLIST Support Information
Hi again, Wednesday, November 26, 2003, 1:41:40 PM, MAU wrote: Is it possible to do a filter rule something like : when a mail arrives and if the sender is this person in address book (considering all its address e-mail) do Take a look at the Advanced tab of filter rules (scroll it

Re: Processing filters against address book

2003-11-26 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Wednesday, November 26, 2003, DOLIST Support Information wrote... Is it possible to do a filter rule something like : when a mail arrives and if the sender is this person in address book (considering all its address e-mail) do Take a look at the Advanced tab of filter rules (scroll

Re: Processing filters against address book

2003-11-26 Thread DOLIST Support Information
Wednesday, November 26, 2003, 3:39:32 PM, Jonathan Angliss wrote: On Wednesday, November 26, 2003, DOLIST Support Information wrote... Is it possible to do a filter rule something like : when a mail arrives and if the sender is this person in address book (considering all its address

Re: Processing filters against address book

2003-11-26 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo DOLIST, On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 23:28:36 +0100GMT (26-11-03, 23:28 +0100, where I live), you wrote: String: . Presence: Yes Location: Kludges Then under the Advanced tab in the filter, check the box that says if they are in the addressbook (or group), then complete the actions for that

Re: Processing filters against address book

2003-11-26 Thread DOLIST Support Information
Wednesday, November 26, 2003, 11:47:49 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: Can be done. Create a AB group called Jimi Add only one entry to this group (Yep our friend with the three addresses) Now create the filter that Jonathan mentioned and let it check whether the sender address is in the address

Re: Processing filters against address book

2003-11-26 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo DOLIST, On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:53:03 +0100GMT (27-11-03, 0:53 +0100, where I live), you wrote: Create a AB group called Jimi DSI Yes but it needs to create one group per entry :/ Sure, but it does what you want it to. It's not like AB groups use extensive hard disk real estate is

Spontaneous changes in Filters

2003-11-23 Thread Mark
Yikes: I logged onto The Bat! today (version 2.0) only to discover that all of my filters in all of my accounts had spontaneously altered (all as before except that the destination folders all reset to the originating folder). That's all 100 odd filters over about 7 different accounts. What

Re: Spontaneous changes in Filters

2003-11-23 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Mark, On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 12:06:35 +GMT (23-11-03, 13:06 +0100, where I live), you wrote: M Yikes: I logged onto The Bat! today (version 2.0) only M to discover that all of my filters in all of my M accounts had spontaneously altered (all as before M except that the destination folders

Re: Marck's SpamCop filters : (

2003-11-23 Thread Kevin Coates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marck, On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:27:12 + (3:27 PM here), Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: MDP I just tested it here and it seems to work well. I'd keep the original spam for bayesian training (via moving with your

Re: Marck's SpamCop filters : (

2003-11-23 Thread MAU
Hello Kevin, ... but the forwards to SpamCop in my Sent Mail folder I can do without. Is there a way of doing this? Create an Outgoing filter that moves from Outbox to Trash messages that include: String: @spam.spamcop.net Location: Recipient Presence: yes -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech

Re: Marck's SpamCop filters : (

2003-11-23 Thread Kevin Coates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi MAU, On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 23:53:36 +0100 (5:53 PM here), MAU [M] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: M Create an Outgoing filter that moves from Outbox to Trash messages that M include: Thank you ... I've got it under control now. ;) - -- Kevin

Re[2]: Marck's SpamCop filters : (

2003-11-21 Thread Antje Lehmann
Hi all, thanks for your replies concerning my filtering problem. Well, now that I've been trying out the filters for a couple of days I seem to be getting closer to the real issue... won't be easy to explain, but I'll try: Whenever I mark a couple of spam mails at once and hit Alt-Ctrl-S

Re: Marck's SpamCop filters : (

2003-11-21 Thread David Boggon
problem ... I think you're using Mozilla aren't you? I have noticed this kind of behaviour elsewhere with Mozilla, though I haven't looked into it yet. For the sake of completion ... the issues which began this thread have been resolved. For a reason unknown to me the filters I had set up (both

Re[2]: Marck's SpamCop filters : (

2003-11-21 Thread Antje Lehmann
the browser.. but nooo, I don't want to ;-) For the sake of completion ... the issues which began this thread have been resolved. For a reason unknown to me the filters I had set up (both the account based one and the common folder based one) kicked in straight away when TB started the next

Re: Marck's SpamCop filters : (

2003-11-21 Thread MAU
of the autoresponders, each one claiming to process a different spam mail. However, as soon as I have the filter for the autoresponders process these mails to open the several browser windows following the links provided in each of the mails, I have been using Spamcop and Marck's filters for quite some

Re: Marck's SpamCop filters : (

2003-11-20 Thread Antje Lehmann
Hi, I have put the filters into my sorting office and they seem to work fine. However, I'm encountering one problem: Whenever the spamcop.bat file is executed to start the browser it won't close by itself, and as long as it is still open TB! does not work properly. I have to close the DOS window

Re: Marck's SpamCop filters : (

2003-11-20 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Antje, On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:15:49 +0100GMT (20-11-03, 14:15 +0100, where I live), you wrote: AL I have to close the DOS window by hand every time. Is the filter AL meant to be like that? Select your spamcop.bat in the windows explorer, right mouse click, properties, 'program' tab check

Re: Marck's SpamCop filters : (

2003-11-20 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Thursday, November 20, 2003, 8:15 AM, you wrote: AL I have put the filters into my sorting office and they seem to work AL fine. However, I'm encountering one problem: Whenever the spamcop.bat AL file is executed to start the browser it won't close by itself, and as AL long as it is still

Re: Marck's SpamCop filters : (

2003-11-20 Thread George Mitchell
Antje Lehmann wrote: I have put the filters into my sorting office and they seem to work fine. However, I'm encountering one problem: Whenever the spamcop.bat file is executed to start the browser it won't close by itself, and as long as it is still open TB! does not work properly. I have

Marck's SpamCop filters : (

2003-11-18 Thread David Boggon
I have been trying to set up Marck's SpamCop filters to automatically submit mail to SpamCop on a hotkey command. Trouble is I can't get it to create a message. The spam gets exported, is sitting there in the temp folder, and the original message moved to the trash folder, but no message

Re: Marck's SpamCop filters : (

2003-11-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi David, @18-Nov-2003, 19:13 David Boggon said: I have been trying to set up Marck's SpamCop filters to automatically submit mail to SpamCop on a hotkey command. Trouble is I can't get it to create a message. I just tested it here and it seems to work well. ... snip

Re: Marck's SpamCop filters : (

2003-11-18 Thread David Boggon
Hi Marck, Thanks for your reply. in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] at 8:27 PM (my time) on Tuesday 18/11/03 you wrote: MDP I just tested it here and it seems to work well. Hmmm MDP And this filter is in the sorting office of the appropriate MDP account? This looks very much like what I have here

Re: Marck's SpamCop filters : (

2003-11-18 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)
On Tuesday, November 18, 2003, 9:16:25 PM, David Boggon wrote: There are some check boxes I don't understand in the 'options' tab of the sorting office... like Check the selected message against this rule and Regular expressions, both of which are unchecked. I have problems getting the spam

selective download of messages with attachments from server using filters

2003-11-17 Thread Vishal
Hi, This is related to another question I just posted. I retrieve my Yahoo mail via web2pop. However, any attachments I receive are in the form of 1.msg files that I cannot open. I usually delete messages from the server when I download them, but I'd like to create a filter that leaves messages

Re: [MyGate] and Download filters

2003-11-11 Thread John Phillips
Hi Michael, On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, at 09:53:42 [GMT+0100] (which was 19:53:42 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: For example to not download messages with certain keywords in the subject. Err, No. Sorry. -- John Phillips, Sydney, Australia Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build

Re: [MyGate] and Download filters

2003-11-11 Thread MAU
Hello John, For example to not download messages with certain keywords in the subject. Err, No. Sorry. No problem. I have already tested it (not thoroughly) and seems to work fine. Thanks. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 Winamp OFF:

Re: [MyGate] and Download filters

2003-11-10 Thread John Phillips
Michael, On Sun, 09 Nov 2003, at 13:04:39 [GMT+0100] (which was 23:04:39 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: Is anybody using Selective download filters for newsgroups via MyGate? Err, how selective? -- John Phillips, Sydney, Australia Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600

Re: [MyGate] and Download filters

2003-11-10 Thread MAU
Hello John, Is anybody using Selective download filters for newsgroups via MyGate? Err, how selective? For example to not download messages with certain keywords in the subject. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 Winamp OFF

[MyGate] and Download filters

2003-11-09 Thread MAU
Hello all, Is anybody using Selective download filters for newsgroups via MyGate? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 Winamp OFF: Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http

Re: and Download filters

2003-11-09 Thread Peter Fjelsten
MAU, On 09-11-2003 13:04, you [M] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: M Is anybody using Selective download filters for newsgroups via M MyGate? I'm not. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 2.01.20 /thebat version os Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack

Filters in a file?

2003-11-05 Thread Cilfa
Hi, I would like to be able to manage my filters with a text file, instead of managing them with the sorting office. Is this possible (and how)? I'm asking this since I have noticed that people post text representations of filters. Managing the filters in a text file seems to me

Re: Filters in a file?

2003-11-05 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Cilfa, @5-Nov-2003, 11:50 +0100 (05-Nov 10:50 UK time) Cilfa [C] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL: C I would like to be able to manage my filters with a text file, C instead of managing them with the sorting office. Is this C possible No. Well, you can keep a repository of useful

Having doubles due to sorting filters

2003-10-31 Thread Edgar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, I've the following problem: I have a filter in my sorting office for read mail and one for answered mail They both look the same: BeginFilter Name: Dinges (Known) Active: 1 Source: \\Account\$KNOWN$ Target: \\Account\Personen\Map voor

Re: Global filters

2003-10-26 Thread Peter Asenbauer
Hi Anthony, Saturday, October 25, 2003, 12:09:16 PM, you wrote: what's the easiest way to copy filters from one account to another (assuming there is a way at all to do this)? You may also want to try Filter Commander v1.20 to copy filters from one account to another: http://tirna.narod.ru

Re: Concatenating incoming filters doesn't work

2003-10-26 Thread MAU
Hello Allie, Phew! That's great since it was really difficult following you all the way. :) Oh, come on! Don't tell me it is difficult to understand what I write :-( -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 Winamp OFF:

Re: Concatenating incoming filters doesn't work

2003-10-26 Thread MAU
Hello Melissa, Indeed! I also just enjoyed reading your little conversation with yourself! :-) Well, I didn't intend it to be a conversation with myself, it intended to be a message asking for help. But a few minutes later I realised that perhaps something was not completely clear and Allie

Re: Global filters

2003-10-26 Thread Edgar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Peter, On Sunday, October 26, 2003, 8:52:24 AM, you wrote: You may also want to try Filter Commander v1.20 to copy filters from one account to another: http://tirna.narod.ru/soft/tbfc.htm http://tirna.narod.ru/soft/files/setup_tbfc120.exe

Re: Concatenating incoming filters doesn't work

2003-10-26 Thread Paul Wilson
Sunday, 10/26/2003, 7:29 AM Hi MAU, On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, at 10:13:44 [GMT +0100] (which was 1:13 AM where I live) you wrote about: 'Concatenating incoming filters doesn't work' M Well, I didn't intend it to be a conversation with myself, it intended M to be a message asking for help. But a few

Re: Concatenating incoming filters doesn't work

2003-10-26 Thread MAU
Hello Paul, Sounds like you owe yourself a beer. BG Ate least two. It was an important issue I helped myself with ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 Winamp PLAYING: Dotsero - Mission MacGyver (WNJL.com Radio - The Home Of Smooth Jazz On The

Concatenating incoming filters doesn't work

2003-10-25 Thread MAU
with other filters. Then, some filters down, I want to test for condition A and: if A is true .and. message is flagged .then. move to folder A1, or if A if true .and. message is not flagged, move to folder A2. Filter 1: If X present, FLAG the message. Continue processing with other filters

Global filters

2003-10-25 Thread Anthony G. Atkielski
Is there a way to define filters that will act on incoming mail from all accounts at one, or must they be defined for each account? In the latter case, what's the easiest way to copy filters from one account to another (assuming there is a way at all to do

Re: Concatenating incoming filters doesn't work

2003-10-25 Thread MAU
Hello MAU, All messages that meet the A condition, and whether flagged or not, end up in folder A2. Although I forgot to say, and just in case, NO message is moved to A1. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 Winamp OFF:

Re: Concatenating incoming filters doesn't work

2003-10-25 Thread MAU
Hello MAU, Filter N+1: If A Move to folder A2 I haven't woke up yet today, I guess. This filter is actually: Filter N+1: If A .and. NOT flagged Move to folder A2 -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 Winamp OFF:

Re: Global filters

2003-10-25 Thread MAU
Hello Anthony, Is there a way to define filters that will act on incoming mail from all accounts at one, or must they be defined for each account? For each account. Copy (with Ctrl+C, NOT the Copy button) and Paste (Ctrl+V) in the new account. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial

Re: Global filters

2003-10-25 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Saturday, October 25, 2003, Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: Is there a way to define filters that will act on incoming mail from all accounts at one, or must they be defined for each account? In the latter case, what's the easiest way to copy filters from one account to another

Re: Concatenating incoming filters doesn't work

2003-10-25 Thread MAU
Hello MAU, Can't a flag or a colour set in one filter be tested in another filter down the list? Or is it perhaps a bug? OK, I have solved my problem. It looks like Flag, Keep, Colour GRoups, etc. cannot be set in one filter and then tested in another filter down the stream. At least it

Re: Concatenating incoming filters doesn't work

2003-10-25 Thread Allie Martin
Mau, [M] wrote: Can't a flag or a colour set in one filter be tested in another filter down the list? Or is it perhaps a bug? M OK, I have solved my problem. Phew! That's great since it was really difficult following you all the way. :) -- -= allie_M =- | List Moderator PGPKeys:

IMAP and filters

2003-10-21 Thread Sean H .
archives I can see that others have the same problem. Has anyone gotten filters to work with IMAP, and if so, how? -- Sean H. Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http

Re: IMAP and filters

2003-10-21 Thread ken green
Sean H . wrote: Has anyone gotten filters to work with IMAP, and if so, how? I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean that *no* filters work for you at all? Or only certain filters? I am using v1.62, which is limited in IMAP functionality compared to v2, but I am able to use filters with IMAP

Re: IMAP and filters

2003-10-21 Thread Jonathan Angliss
. Not good, to say the least. I think the filters stuff is on the works of a rewrite, this is probably to account for the new IMAP protocol support, and some newer features. I'm finding it awfully frustrating that I cannot filter mail, so you're not the only one. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED

Re[2]: IMAP and filters

2003-10-21 Thread Jim D
On 10/21/2003, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ken green said: I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean that *no* filters work for you at all? Or only certain filters? I am using v1.62, which is limited in IMAP functionality compared to v2, but I am able to use filters with IMAP accounts. I beg

Re: IMAP and filters

2003-10-21 Thread ken green
of *filters* I think of what TB does to a particular message (in the context of my installation - locally). What you are describing I would call folder management and/or server-side filters. My misunderstanding. I got excited about IMAP in v2.0, I stopped using IMAP, because it still has problems

Rethread Messages Filters

2003-10-17 Thread Jim D
Myotis Mates, From the Macro Library: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Library.html#rethread+messages I don't seem to be able to make this work properly. Has anyone actually gotten these to work? I have: 1) copied the filters to SmartBat and cleaned them up. I am assuming

Re: Rethread Messages Filters

2003-10-17 Thread MAU
Hello Jim, From the Macro Library: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Library.html#rethread+messages I don't seem to be able to make this work properly. Has anyone actually gotten these to work? I never tried because I use my own manual re-thread macro (PowerPro macro). In case

Know Filter and Continue processing with other filters

2003-10-14 Thread Chris
When I check the Continue processing with other filters box on the Known filter, it will check. If the rule is active and I leave the Sorting Office, when I return the box is no longer checked. However, if the rule in NOT active, the box will stay checked. Can anyone confirm? (I happened

Finding the folders icon in the filters dialog

2003-10-04 Thread Pranav Lal
Hi all, This question is directed specifically at screen reader users. How does one find the folders icon in the main filters dialog? I need to change the folder where the messages are being filtered too. The edit box displaying the folder is just before the strings edit box. There is supposed

Re: suggestion: logging for kill filters

2003-09-25 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Chris, Wednesday, September 24, 2003, 5:17:40 PM, you wrote: C I think that that would be a great feature. If the developers were C feeling particularly energetic, they could put a Verbose Logging C option on the Options or Advanced tab in the Sorting C Office/Filters. moderator

suggestion: logging for kill filters

2003-09-24 Thread Peter Asenbauer
Hi everyone, One of my killfilters just finished with an email I would have liked to receive and/or read. I only found out by comparing the log from spampal ... SpamPalLog 030924-135311 -- none [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamPalLog [EMAIL PROTECTED] Confirmation -- send email when the item is in stock

Re: suggestion: logging for kill filters

2003-09-24 Thread ken green
Peter Asenbauer wrote: One of my killfilters just finished with an email I would have liked to receive and/or read. During my quest to understand/configure Selective Download, I have created 2 filters and 2 signal string files to load: SPAMkill and SPAMignore. The SPAMignore filter/file

Re: suggestion: logging for kill filters

2003-09-24 Thread Chris
On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 at 9:17:46 AM, Peter Asenbauer wrote in the message suggestion: logging for kill filters mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi everyone, One of my killfilters just finished with an email I would have liked to receive and/or read. I only found out by comparing the log

RE:Selective download filters

2003-09-22 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Douglas, Monday, September 22, 2003, 7:06:50 AM, you wrote: I link all accounts to the same text file, which I continue to lengthen whenever new Spam mongers are found. This is much easier that adding strings to each and every separate account. could you maybe share this file with me?

Re[2]: Selective download filters

2003-09-22 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hello Jurgen other TB! list members following this thread, On Monday, September 22, 2003 Jurgen responded to my saying the following: I link all accounts to the same text file, which I continue to lengthen whenever new Spam mongers are found. This is much easier that adding strings to each

Re[2]: Selective download filters

2003-09-22 Thread Douglas Hinds
Jurgen, I sent the following to TBUDL twice earlier and yet it hasn't been posted. I wonder why. Two other posts I sent were posted, so I'm not being blocked out. Maybe if you redirect it, it will go through. Douglas Hello Jurgen other TB! list members following this thread, On

Re:Selective download filters

2003-09-21 Thread Rob
Hi ken, on Sat, 20 Sep 2003, at 22:17:13 local time (GMT -0500), you wrote: kg I have tried entering the list of addresses in the signal strings box, kg as well as using a text file and checking 'load signal strings from a kg file' - in both cases, each address/domain was listed on a new line,

Re: Selective download filters

2003-09-21 Thread ken green
Rob wrote: what did you put in 'Detect by' on the 'Rule' tab ?? i'm using a text-file with a bunch of subject-lines used by daemons to bounce mail, to kill replies to non-existing addresses on my account by flagging 'subject' and it works like a charm ... 'Detect by' is set to 'Entire

Re: FIlters in V2 IMAP

2003-09-21 Thread Martin Webster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Edward, On 21 September 2003, 07:18 -0700 (15:18 local time) Edward J. Krall [EJK] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: EJK I must be missing something simple... EJK I upgraded to V2, and am using an IMAP account. Filters used to work EJK great

Re: Selective download filters

2003-09-21 Thread ken green
A-ha!! Saw another thread that mentioned filters not working with IMAP. I just tested my Spamkill Selective download on my one POP account and it worked. I guess that makes - IMAP filters are usually done at the server, correct? I guess I need to decide if I should switch all account to POP3

Re[2]: Selective download filters

2003-09-21 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hello ken other TB! list members following this thread, On Sunday, September 21, 2003, you wrote: kg I guess I need to decide if I should switch all account to POP3 kg or continue using IMAP and create a sorting rule that would kg delete unwanted messages from the server. kg Hmmm any

Selective download filters

2003-09-20 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello TBUDL, After getting about 200 Sven worm type emails a day, I would like to know if the selective download filter is case sensitive. Is the string this is a string the same as This Is a String as far as the filter is concerned? -- Best regards, Michael ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: Selective download filters

2003-09-20 Thread Gordon Woolf
Hello Michael, On Saturday, September 20, 2003, 6:16:54 PM, you wrote: After getting about 200 Sven worm type emails a day, I would like to know if the selective download filter is case sensitive. Is the string this is a string the same as This Is a String as far as the filter is

Re[2]: Selective download filters

2003-09-20 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Gordon, On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, at 18:38:07 [GMT +1000] (which was 09:38 in my TimeZone) you wrote: GW Hello Michael, GW On Saturday, September 20, 2003, 6:16:54 PM, you wrote: After getting about 200 Sven worm type emails a day, I would like to know if the selective download filter

Filters Management

2003-09-20 Thread ETM
I have 209 folders with perhaps anywhere from one to four filter rules per folder. Is there a way to alphabetize the filters and is there a way to work with them away from TB!? I am looking for an easy way out to search, find and edit. Elaine

Re: Filters Management

2003-09-20 Thread John Phillips
Hi Elaine, On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, at 06:08:01 [GMT-0400] (which was 20:08:01 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: I am looking for an easy way out to search, find and edit. I think we all are! :-( -- John Phillips, Sydney, Australia Using The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service

Re: Filters Management

2003-09-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello ETM, On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 06:08:01 -0400 GMT (20/09/2003, 17:08 +0700 GMT), ETM wrote: I have 209 folders with perhaps anywhere from one to four filter rules per folder. Is there a way to alphabetize the filters and is there a way to work with them away from TB!? You don't want

Re: Selective download filters

2003-09-20 Thread ken green
address/domain was listed on a new line, and the Advanced tab options were: Action: Kill and Detection method: Any strings match. But I can't get this to work. According the help system, Selective download signal strings do not allow the special syntax used by other types of filters. How are people

Moving filters between accounts

2003-09-08 Thread Alexander A. Gomanyuk
Hello Batmans! I've encountered with problem. I have MULTIPLIES filter on one account and i'd like to move corresponding Folder and its filters to another account. I have no any problems with Folders, but Filters. Any suggestions would be appreciable! Your sincerely registered, Sasha

Re: Moving filters between accounts

2003-09-08 Thread MAU
Hello Alexander, I have no any problems with Folders, but Filters. Any suggestions would be appreciable! It is no problem either. When you move a folder, let's say folder A, the filters that move messages to folder Possible_path/A are automatically changed to move messages to New_Account

Re: Filters, Spam and Edits

2003-08-29 Thread Allie Martin
. This is actually a redirect operation that you've executed. The official shortcut is CTRL-F6. However, at times there are times when a single operation is bound to multiple shortcuts and you seem to have stumbled on one of them. For editing messages, I've created two filters. The first filter

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >